Addiction Is a Choice
2/5
()
About this ebook
This theory, which grew out of the Temperance movement and was developed and disseminated by the religious cult known as Alcoholics Anonymous, has not been confirmed by any factual research. Numerous scientific studies show that 'addicts' are in control of their behavior.
Contrary to the shrill, mindless propaganda of the 'war on drugs', very few of the people who use alcohol, marijuana, heroin, or cocaine will ever become 'addicted', and of those who do become heavy drug users, most will matrue out of it in time, without treatment. Research indicates that 'treatment' is completely ineffective, an absolute waste of time and money.
Instead of looking at drub addiction as a disease, Dr. Schaler proposes that we view it as willful commitment or dedication, akin to joining a religion or pursuing a romantic involvement. While heavy consumption of drugs is often foolish and self-destructive, it is a matter of personal choice.
Related to Addiction Is a Choice
Related ebooks
Truth About Addiction and Recovery Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Addiction & Recovery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsI'll Quit Tomorrow: A Practical Guide to Alcoholism Treatmen Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Addiction Solution: Treating Our Dependence on Opioids and Other Drugs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAddiction--What's Really Going on?: Inside a Heroin Treatment Program Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Recovery Options: The Complete Guide Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Drug Pandemic: An American Tragedy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Addictive Personality: Understanding the Addictive Process and Compulsive Behavior Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5American Overdose: America’s Addiction Crises, The Whole Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThere's More Than One Way to Get to Cleveland: 10 Lifestyles of Recovery That Lead to Freedom From Addiction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPassages Through Recovery: An Action Plan for Preventing Relapse Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mistaken Beliefs About Relapse Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Thinking Person's Guide to Sobriety Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadical Recovery: 12 Recovery Myths: the Addiction Survivor's Guide to the Twelve Steps Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Cravings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5AA Truth Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Common Sense Recovery: An Atheist's Guide to Alcoholics Anonymous Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGet Smart About Alcohol Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAddicts in Wonderland Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAA: Who It Helps, Who It Harms, Who It Kills, & Why Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStarting Point for Recovery: A Simple 12 Step Guide for Use in Counseling for Addiction Recovery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Addiction Battle: Three Tools to End It Now Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlive Again: Recovering from Alcoholism and Drug Addiction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsI’m Not an Addict … I’m Just an Ass!: I’d Rather Be a Smart Ass Than a Dumb Ass! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStage II Recovery: Life Beyond Addiction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Free at Last: Daily Meditations by and for Inmates Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Happy Addict: How to be Happy in Recovery from Alcoholism or Drug Addiction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Now What?: An Insider's Guide to Addiction and Recovery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Recovery Formula: An Addict's Guide to getting Clean and Sober Forever Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Psychology For You
Running on Empty: Overcome Your Childhood Emotional Neglect Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Talk to Anyone: 92 Little Tricks for Big Success in Relationships Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5101 Fun Personality Quizzes: Who Are You . . . Really?! Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Maybe You Should Talk to Someone: A Therapist, HER Therapist, and Our Lives Revealed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Keep House While Drowning: A Gentle Approach to Cleaning and Organizing Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Letting Go: Stop Overthinking, Stop Negative Spirals, and Find Emotional Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Self-Care for People with ADHD: 100+ Ways to Recharge, De-Stress, and Prioritize You! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Win Friends and Influence People: Updated For the Next Generation of Leaders Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life: Life-Changing Tools for Healthy Relationships Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What Happened to You?: Conversations on Trauma, Resilience, and Healing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Laziness Does Not Exist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Witty Banter: Be Clever, Quick, & Magnetic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Maybe You Should Talk to Someone: the heartfelt, funny memoir by a New York Times bestselling therapist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Covert Passive Aggressive Narcissist: The Narcissism Series, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lost Connections: Uncovering the Real Causes of Depression – and the Unexpected Solutions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Changes That Heal: Four Practical Steps to a Happier, Healthier You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Introverted Leader: Building on Your Quiet Strength Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow Am I Doing?: 40 Conversations to Have with Yourself Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Everything Is F*cked: A Book About Hope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What Every BODY is Saying: An Ex-FBI Agent's Guide to Speed-Reading People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Addiction Is a Choice
4 ratings2 reviews
- Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5This book is trash. The author is obviously not speaking from a place of personal experience. Yes using drugs or alcohol for the FIRST TIME is a choice. However once you become dependent or even worse physically addicted it is sadly no longer is a choice! Most addicts suffer with some sort of mental illness also. Addiction Is Real and IS A DISEASE! Do your homework Dr. Jeffrey A. Schaler!!
*I was unable to give zero stars unfortunately. - Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Many things are totally untrue and it's obvious that the writer never had any addiction, so he s not in the position to speak about it like that without being in these shoes.
Book preview
Addiction Is a Choice - Jeffrey A. Schaler
Table of Contents
Title Page
Dedication
Epigraph
About the Author
Preface
Introduction
Chapter 1 - Two Ways of Looking at Addiction
The Disease Model—What It Is
The Credo of the Disease Model
Good and Bad Addictions
The Iron Will of the Addict
Self-Efficacy versus the Disease Model
The Free-Will Model: What It Is
The Credo of the Free-Will Model
Chapter 2 - Is Addiction Really a Disease?
What Is a Disease?
Addiction, a Physical Disease?
A Mental or Metaphorical Disease?
Chapter 3 - Do Drug Addicts Lose It?
Alcoholics Control Their Drinking
Is Marijuana a Gateway Drug?
Marijuana Smokers Control Their Smoking
Cocaine Users Control Their Cocaine Consumption
Heroin Addicts Control Their Use of Heroin
What We Can Learn from Rat Park
Risky, Unwise, or Self-Destructive Choices
Chapter 4 - How Beliefs Affect Reality
The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Drug War Propaganda
Learning from the Navajo
The Menace of the Disease Model
Addiction Treatments Don’t Work
The Disease Model’s Catch–22
Chapter 5 - Where the Disease Model Came From
The ‘Good Creature of God’
A Disease Is Invented
Universal Addictiveness
From Demon Rum to Alcoholics Anonymous
The Loss-of-Control Theory
The Selling of the Disease Concept
Twelve-Step Imperialism
Chapter 6 - Smoking Right and Responsibility
Chapter 7 - Who Are the Addiction Treatment Providers?
Alcoholics Anonymous
AA: A Totemic Religion?
Treatment Providers’ Organizations
Why the Treatment Providers’ Beliefs Are Important
Facts about Treatment Providers
AA Spiritual Thinking: Kurtz’s Four Elements
The Two Dimensions of AA Spiritual Thinking
Appendix: A Study of Addiction Treatment Providers
Chapter 8 - Busting the Disease-Model Cult
The AA Cult
Cult Dogma versus Logic
How the Cult Maintains Its Grip
How the Cult Attacks Its Critics
Recognizing a Cult and Busting It
Chapter 9 - The Project MATCH Cover-Up
The Scope of Project MATCH
Findings of Project MATCH
Denial!
Is TSF the AA’s Approach?
Spin Doctoring by Project MATCH
Selling Water by the River
Orwellian Doublethink
Chapter 10 - Moderation Management and Murder
Getting Away with Murder
Have Nothing to Do with MM
Froistad Convicted
Postscript, 2002
Chapter 11 - Thinking Differently about Addiction
The Spell of Prozac
Drugs and Religion Are Similar Experiences
Drugs Have No Power over People
The Disease Model Is Bad Medicine
All Pain Is in the Mind
Chapter 12 - Addiction Treatment and the First Amendment
Court-ordered Indoctrination
Treatment Violates the Constitution
Addiction Treatment Is Religion
What Makes a Religion?
Freedom from Religion
Chapter 13 - What to Do about Drugs
Public Policy: Call off the ‘War on Drugs’
Public Policy: Stop Funding ‘Addiction Treatment’
Drugs and Your Children
OK, So What about Me?
Bibliography
Index
Copyright Page
To the memory of my father,
Otto Gerhard Julius Schaler,
who taught me about courage and vigilance;
and to my mother,
Elizabeth Schiltz Schaler,
who taught me about courage and forgiveness.
It is one of the most mysterious compensatory phenomena of our history that the individual, the more forcefully he seeks to emerge from a world rooted in collectivism, stubbornly undermines his own qualities, by means of a doctrine of man assigning each feature and peculiarity in turn to non-individual forces that in the end become completely dehumanized.... This is the alchemy of the modern age, the transmogrification of subject into object, of man into a thing against which the destructive urge may wreak its fury without restraint.
Alexander Mitscherlich and Fred Mielke,
Doctors of Infamy (1949)
About the Author
Jeffrey A. Schaler is a psychologist and consultant on addiction and social policy in Silver Spring, Maryland. He received his bachelor’s degree in human interaction and group dynamics from Antioch College in 1973 and his master’s degree (1986) and doctoral degree (1993) at the Institute for Child Study/Department of Human Development, University of Maryland College Park. He is an adjunct professor of justice, law, and society at American I University’s School of Public Affairs in Washington, D.C.; on the faculty teaching psychology at Johns Hopkins University; and an adjunct professor of psychology at Montgomery College in Rockville, Maryland. He served on the Montgomery County (Maryland) Drug Abuse Advisory Council from 1982 to 1988. A frequent guest over the years on national radio and television shows discussing addiction, psychiatry, law, and public policy, he edited Drugs: Should We Legalize, Decriminalize, or Deregulate? and co-edited, with Magda E. Schaler, Smoking: Who Has the Right?, both published in 1998. He lives in Erdenheim, Pennsylvania. His e-mail address is [email protected] and his home page on the world wide web is at http://www.schaler.net
Preface
Parts of this book are reworkings of material which first appeared in earlier writings of mine (see the Bibliography for full publication details): Schaler 1988a; 1989a; 1989c; 1989d; 1991; 1995a; 1995b; 1996a; 1996b; 1996d; 1997a, 1997b; 1997f; 1998b; 1998d.
My thinking about these and related matters is most strongly influenced by conversations over the years with Ron Aarons, Bruce K. Alexander, George J. Alexander, John O. Becker, Nelson Borelli, Ernest H. Bradley, Morris E. Chafetz, David J. Essex, Herbert Fingarette, Amos M. Gunsberg, Patrick Hickey, A. Tom Horvath, Nick Laird, Ron Leifer, John Marks, Paul Moore III, Christopher A. Rose, Martin W. Smith, Thomas S. Szasz, Arnold S. Trebach, and Richard Vatz. If you, reader, feel inclined to say ‘that idea came from’ any of those people it probably did.
I’m fortunate to have had the opportunity to teach thousands of students in diverse academic settings including American University, Johns Hopkins University, Montgomery College, and the Institute for Humane Studies at George Mason University—students who trusted, challenged, and respected me as we ventured together into so many new and difficult intellectual frontiers. In this regard, I would like to express a special appreciation for being invited to teach these and related ideas concerning mental illness, liberty, and justice at American University’s School of Public Affairs for the past ten years. My academic freedom has always been supported there. I realize and appreciate now how rare academic freedom really is.
I would like to thank Mark Brady for inviting me to teach these related ideas to students at the Institute for Humane Studies at George Mason university over the years.
Bruce Alexander, Patricia Erickson, and Michael Edelstein gave useful comments on parts of the manuscript.
Henry Azar and Axel W. Bauer kindly gave me important feedback on the history and science of nosology and pathology.
The conversations I’ve had with many hundreds of clients in my private practice over the past 26 years have been very important to my thinking on these and related matters. Thank you all for our work together.
A special thanks to Sunkyo Kwon in Berlin, Editor-in-Chief of Psychnews International, for giving me the opportunity to express many of my ideas and views on the Internet.
I’m also indebted to David Ramsay Steele, my editor at Open Court, for inviting me to write this book, as well as for his honesty, encouragement, and friendship.
My wife Renee and daughter Magda know more about my journey than anyone. I doubt I could have gotten here without them.
Introduction
They have addicted themselves to the ministry of the saints.
King James Bible, 1 Cor. xvi.15 (1611)
You Choose Your Addictions
‘Addiction’ is a fine old English word meaning commitment, dedication, devotion, inclination, bent, or attachment.
Particular addictions may be good or bad. Some folk are addicted to music, others to books, others to walks in the country. Some are addicted to a religious doctrine or community, be it the Roman Catholic, the Mormon, or the Zen Buddhist. Others are addicted to a political philosophy, like liberalism, socialism, or anarchism, or to a ‘cause’, like animal rights or free trade.
Some people are addicted to another person: perhaps their spouse, perhaps their latest flame. Others are addicted to a habit, like getting up early every morning. Michelangelo was addicted to painting and sculpting, Einstein was addicted to physics, Proust was addicted to writing, Gandhi was addicted to independence for India. Many others, of course, have been equally addicted to these pursuits, but have lacked exceptional talent.
Sometimes addictions fade gradually. The ardent lover becomes the jaded husband, or the heavy drinker of alcohol gradually moderates. Other times, one addiction is suddenly replaced by another: the ardent lover of x becomes the ardent lover of y, or the heavy drinker becomes instead a born-again Christian. Malcolm X relates how converts to the Nation of Islam quickly abandoned any of their former drug-taking habits.
An addiction is not exactly the same as a habit, though one can be addicted to a habit. John Stuart Mill refers to A man who causes grief to his family by addiction to bad habits.
Addiction is a fondness for, or orientation toward, some thing or activity, because it has meaning, because it is considered valuable or even sacred. In some cases, people may be addicted to something because they find it enjoyable, and this, of course, also reflects their values: such a person believes that the right way to live is to seek enjoyment.
Human life is always involved with addictions, and would be wretched and worthless, perhaps even impossible, without addictions. Addico, ergo sum. Yet human life can be devastated or horribly blighted by ill-chosen addictions. A simple example would be that of an adolescent drawn into an apparently warm and benevolent religious group, which only gradually comes forth in its true colors as a destructive cult of collective suicide. Another example might be a young person in the 1930s, becoming a Communist or a National Socialist.
Addictions are indispensable. Addictions—and only addictions—can open us up to all that makes life rich and fulfilling. Yet addictions can also have appalling consequences. The conclusion is clear: choose your addictions very carefully! Nothing is more vital for a young person than to select the right addictions. Addictions we approve of are called ‘virtues’. Addictions we disapprove of are called ‘vices’.
Can Addiction Be Involuntary?
In recent years, the word ‘addiction’ has come to be used with quite a different meaning. It is now taken to refer to any activity which individuals engage in, deliberately and consciously, and are physically unable to stop themselves pursuing. Thus (it is claimed) the heroin addict cannot refrain from injecting himself with heroin, the alcohol addict or ‘alcoholic’ cannot refrain from swallowing alcoholic beverages, Bill Clinton cannot refrain from having sexual relations with his subordinates, the overspending housewife cannot refrain from buying ‘unnecessary’ things in stores, and the compulsive gambler cannot stop gambling.
In this newfangled sense of ‘addiction’, I maintain that ‘addiction’ is a myth. I deny that there is any such thing as ‘addiction’, in the sense of a deliberate and conscious course of action which the person literally cannot stop doing. According to my view of the world, the heroin addict can stop injecting himself with heroin, the alcohol addict can stop himself from swallowing whiskey, and so forth. People are responsible for their deliberate and conscious behavior.
I find it difficult to avoid smiling while solemnly stating the above, since it’s so manifestly true. Most people are tacitly aware that it’s true, regardless of what the pundits tell them. But leading ‘authorities’—usually journalists who know nothing—keep on telling the public that ‘addicts’ physically cannot stop doing whatever it is that they do (and the authority objects to them doing).
As a simple and ludicrous example, take the campaign against smoking tobacco. We are constantly being told that cigarettes are addictive, and that this means that teenagers who start smoking will be ‘hooked’ for life.
Meanwhile, millions of heavy, habitual, lifelong cigarette smokers have quit smoking, the vast majority of them without any professional help or ‘treatment’. Inescapably, for these millions of smokers, smoking was a choice—was presumably always a choice, even during the decades when they were smoking every day. How do the proponents of the ‘involuntary addiction’ ideology respond to this evidence? Amazingly, they claim that, while those smokers who chose to quit were indeed able to make that choice, exactly those smokers who have not so far quit smoking are unable to do so! Notice that according to this way of thinking, individuals demonstrate their inability to make a choice simply by making the ‘wrong’ choice, the one we wish they hadn’t made.
In the pursuit of such ideological campaigns, any absurdity will be accepted. For example, what is it that smokers are addicted to? Nicotine, say the anti-smoking fanatics. But there are many ways to get nicotine into one’s body: injection, swallowing tablets, a skin patch, and so forth. The vast majority of the injurious health effects attributed to smoking (such as lung cancer) have nothing to do with nicotine. The fear of lung cancer has induced millions of individuals to give up smoking cigarettes, but it has induced very few to start swallowing nicotine tablets. Evidently, we are witnessing confusion and incoherence, even at the most elementary level.
Those who believe absurdities will commit atrocities,
said Voltaire. Pointing out such simple blunders as those mentioned above will not always be immediately effective in persuading the anti-smoking crusaders to abandon their illiberal and monstrous campaign of repression. They are addicted to their anti-smoking bigotry. Their addiction does not relieve them of responsibility for their actions. We are all responsible for our addictions and for the actions we perform in pursuit of our addictions. The anti-smoking bigots have chosen their addiction—a particularly nasty one whose ill-effects fall mainly on other people, not themselves. They are addicted to the notion that the police should chase people who live incorrectly, forcing them to comply with the currently fashionable definition of a wholesome lifestyle. The same goes for all those who wage a war on people, calling it a ‘war on drugs’.
Changing One’s Addictions May Be Hard
It is often not a simple matter to induce people to give up their vicious addictions and replace them with virtuous ones. Their values, the principles that give meaning to their lives, need to be transformed. They may not share our opinion as to which addictions are virtuous and which addictions are vicious. But even if they do share our opinion, in the sense that they assent to it, they may hold other beliefs which imply a continued commitment, that is, a continued addiction, to the old way of life. The transition from one addiction to a different addiction—from drunkenness to sobriety, from sexual promiscuity to marital fidelity, from frequenting the local casino to frequenting the local Episcopalian church—may be a difficult struggle.
A person with an addiction may come to believe that this addiction is not really for the best. That person may decide it would be better to abandon it. But because all our beliefs, values, habits, and physiological responses are an intricately woven web, that person may often find the ‘tug’ of their old addiction quite powerful. Turning away from the thing which has been the pivot on which one’s existence has turned, the altar at which one has worshiped daily, the central activity of one’s life, may take effort and application. It may not be as easy as snapping one’s fingers. There is no need to dream up some far-fetched, scientifically worthless fantasy about ‘physical addiction’ to account for this fact, familiar as it has been down the ages. Or do we really suppose that a nineteenth-century African villager, converted to Christianity by white missionaries, a villager who then suffered the most agonizing terrors because he was no longer performing the rituals required to placate the animistic spirits of his traditional culture, was suffering from a medical condition, physical dependence upon animistic religion?
In saying that addiction is a choice, I don’t mean to imply that it is always an easy choice. I don’t deny that people have problems, and among these problems may be attachments which are difficult to break off, undesirable habits that are hard to shake. ‘Breaking up is so very hard to do’, says the old pop song. It’s true of practices as well as people.
I do not, of course, dispute that many people are properly objects of our compassion and help because they feel that their lives are out of control. Indeed, I have spent much of my working life as a psychologist trying to help such people. I have often found, however, that a person suffering from a harmful addiction (‘presenting with’ it, as we psychologists like to say), whether to the ingestion of a chemical substance or to some other pattern of behavior, actually has a different problem in his or her life, a problem not obviously related to the addiction. When that problem is resolved, I often find that the person abandons the harmful addiction.
It’s ironic that the ideologues of ‘involuntary addiction’ make it more difficult to help such people. They do this by preaching that addiction to the practice of consuming a chemical substance, such as alcohol or cocaine, is a disease. Their first job, they believe, is to convince ‘addicts’ that they are sick, and therefore not responsible for their actions. In my judgment, this is just about the worst thing we could possibly tell such people. To someone engaged in a bitter struggle to give up one way of life and find a replacement, it is discouraging and demoralizing to be informed that their old way of life is somehow fated, predetermined by their body chemistry. It’s also untrue. I always advise such individuals that they can control themselves and their lives, that they have the power to renounce an old addiction, if they really want to. This, I believe, is helpful to them. It’s also the truth.
In this book, I sometimes compare drug addiction with religion. Religious devotion or piety is one of the most familiar addictions. Another is romantic love, the addiction to another specific individual, a potential sexual partner. I do not make these comparisons to demean religion or love, or to defend drug addiction. I merely seek to accentuate an underlying similarity.
Though drawing attention to parallels among different addictions, I don’t maintain that all addictions are on a par. When it comes to the consumption of chemical