Using Rubrics for Performance-Based Assessment: A Practical Guide to Evaluating Student Work
By Todd Stanley
4.5/5
()
About this ebook
Writing a rubric that can accurately evaluate student work can be tricky. Rather than a single right or wrong answer, rubrics leave room for interpretation and thus subjectivity. How does a teacher who wants to use performance-based assessment in this day and age of SMART goals find a way to reliably assess student work? The solution is to write clear rubrics that allow the evaluator to objectively assess the student work. This book will show classroom teachers not only how to create their own objective rubrics, which can be used to evaluate performance assessments, but also how to empower their own students to create rubrics that are tailored to their work.
Todd Stanley
Todd Stanley is the author of 10 teacher education books including "Project-Based Learning for Gifted Students: A Handbook for the 21st-Century Classroom." He was a classroom teacher for 18 years and is currently the gifted services coordinator for Pickerington Local Schools, where he lives with his wife and two daughters.
Read more from Todd Stanley
Performance-Based Assessment for 21st-Century Skills Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning: Practical Strategies for Developing Students' Critical Thinking Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen Smart Kids Underachieve in School: Practical Solutions for Teachers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Case Studies and Case-Based Learning: Inquiry and Authentic Learning That Encourages 21st-Century Skills Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Enrichment Activities for Gifted Students: Extracurricular Academic Activities for Gifted Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Using Rubrics for Performance-Based Assessment
Related ebooks
Using Formative Assessment to Improve Student Outcomes in the Classroom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssessment Powered Teaching Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Teaching As Leadership: The Highly Effective Teacher's Guide to Closing the Achievement Gap Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education: A Guide for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Powerful Lesson Planning: Every Teacher's Guide to Effective Instruction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReflective Practice for Educators: Professional Development to Improve Student Learning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCheck for Understanding 65 Classroom Ready Tactics: Formative Assessment Made Easy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Active Learning in the Middle Grades Classroom Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Making Thinking Visible: How to Promote Engagement, Understanding, and Independence for All Learners Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Differentiating with Graphic Organizers: Tools to Foster Critical and Creative Thinking Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/550 Ways to Be a Better Teacher: Professional Development Techniques Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Co-Teaching That Works: Structures and Strategies for Maximizing Student Learning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Flipped Learning: Gateway to Student Engagement Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Engaging the Online Learner: Activities and Resources for Creative Instruction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Teachers’ Perception of the Use of Differentiated Instruction Strategies on Teacher Practice and Student Learning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInquiry Mindset: Scaffolding a Partnership for Equity and Agency in Learning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Flipped Assessment: A Leap towards Assessment for Learning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSimple. Practical. Effective. A Framework for Literacy-Based Instructional Leadership High School Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Joy of Teaching: A Practical Guide for New College Instructors Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Assessment Strategies for Online Learning: Engagement and Authenticity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quick Student Engagement Ideas for Busy Teachers: Creative Ideas From 1000 Remarkable Faculty & Students Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Practical Reading Strategies: Engaging Activities for Secondary Students Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHacking Student Learning Habits: 9 Ways to Foster Resilient Learners and Assess the Process Not the Outcome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Teaching Methods & Materials For You
Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Writing Well, 30th Anniversary Edition: An Informal Guide to Writing Nonfiction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Financial Feminist: Overcome the Patriarchy's Bullsh*t to Master Your Money and Build a Life You Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages of Children: The Secret to Loving Children Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Personal Finance for Beginners - A Simple Guide to Take Control of Your Financial Situation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speed Reading: Learn to Read a 200+ Page Book in 1 Hour: Mind Hack, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Writing to Learn: How to Write - and Think - Clearly About Any Subject at All Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jack Reacher Reading Order: The Complete Lee Child’s Reading List Of Jack Reacher Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles: Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anxious Generation - Workbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Octavia Butler's "Parable of the Sower" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEverything You Need to Know About Personal Finance in 1000 Words Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inside American Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Learn French - Parallel Text - Easy Stories (English - French) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Divided Mind: The Epidemic of Mindbody Disorders Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Take Smart Notes. One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How You Learn Is How You Live: Using Nine Ways of Learning to Transform Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Three Bears Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Lost Tools of Learning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dance of Anger: A Woman's Guide to Changing the Patterns of Intimate Relationships Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Using Rubrics for Performance-Based Assessment
2 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Using Rubrics for Performance-Based Assessment - Todd Stanley
Author
Introduction
The Unintended Consequences of SMART Goals
As anyone who has spent any time in education knows, there are movements that come with the field. For example, among others, there is the standards movement, the small schools movement, the college- and career-ready movement, and the movement of integrating technology into the classroom. Beyond these, one prominent movement throughout the past decade has been the educational data movement. The essential question of the data movement is What data can you show me to prove that students are learning?
In the past, educators depended on subjective measures, such as grades, teacher recommendations, and graduation requirements, to determine whether a student was succeeding or not. Now the expectation is that objective measures will show educators whether a child is really learning. The goal is to convert the measurement of mastery into a quantifiable number that will prove whether or not a student is growing as a learner.
Part of this movement led to the use of SMART goals (The Mind Tools Content Team, n.d.) in education. These are goals that are:
✓S—specific,
✓M—measurable,
✓A—achievable,
✓R—realistic, and
✓T—time related.
The idea behind SMART goals is to conduct an assessment that can measure growth. If the assessment determines that a student is not growing as a learner, then practices are put into place to help him or her do so.
Different groups use SMART goals to measure their success. For instance, businesses use SMART goals to increase profits, improve customer service, and increase efficiency in business operations. The medical field can look at patient visits, quality of care, and health outcomes. Sports teams use SMART goals to make players more effective, improve statistics, and set goals to improve wins. If these goals work for such organizations, why would education not want to use such a system—especially if it is going to improve student achievement?
These goals can be used at various levels of an educational organization, from the central office setting big picture goals for the district, to schools measuring the building’s success on particular skills, to individual teachers trying to demonstrate the growth of their students, to even having students set their own SMART goals as they persevere toward new achievements.
For example, a teacher might use SMART goals in the classroom by giving a class a math test. One student misses questions 2, 4, 7, and 11, all of which have to do with fractions. This might indicate to the teacher that this student needs more intervention with fractions, so the teacher works with the student further, breaking concepts down into more understandable chunks and providing more practice. If several students in the class show a similar pattern, the lesson on fractions may need to be retaught to the whole class. On the other hand, the results of the test might show a teacher the areas in which a student displays strengths, which would hopefully inspire this teacher to find ways to challenge the child by learning about the concept in more depth.
SMART goals sound great, but here is the problem: SMART goals seek to get to an unbiased, cold hard fact that indicates the mastery of a student. Either the student mastered the objective or he did not. How black and white can you get? To make the evaluation of mastery as objective as possible, providing questions with one correct answer seems logical. This eliminates the subjectivity of open-ended questions that have multiple possible answers and are subject to interpretation. Having one correct answer to a question avoids the problem of one teacher evaluating a student’s response one way, while another teacher might see things differently because there is so much discrepancy in what may be considered mastery-level work. This is why most state assessments use mostly, or all, multiple-choice questions—because the testing coordinators do not have to train evaluators to be as unbiased as possible.
In the classroom, this might involve a teacher writing a 10-question multiple-choice test to determine whether students understand proper sentence structure. One student gets eight of the questions correct. This student displays mastery of the skill, perhaps only requiring a brief review of the two missed questions. Another student gets only three of the questions correct, showing a lack of mastery of the skill, requiring intervention. These examples are objective uses of data. A multiple-choice test is easy and quick to grade—the answers are clear.
Although this is the ideal way to assess mastery in an ideal world, and certainly the easiest, there are certain skills that are more difficult to objectively measure, such as public speaking. After all, how does one rate a student in public speaking? If you are rating a performance, there is a lot of interpretation that can take place. One person might think the student spoke very well, while another might have seen some issues. Because this rating is based on opinion, many would argue that this type of assessment does not invoke the tenets of SMART goals. Otherwise, everyone who evaluated this student would decide the same result. Also, the amount of time it takes for the student to give his or her speech and for the evaluator to rate it is much more involved than other more objective forms of assessment—and time is one of those things in today’s world of content standards that teachers do not have a whole lot of. So, if you are trying to create an objective and easy-to-grade assessment, a logical choice would be a multiple-choice test. A student could have the following question on an assessment:
Which of the following is the best way to present a speech to a crowd?
a. Reading from your notes word for word
b. Speaking to one spot on the wall
c. Glancing around the room in a fidgety manner
d. Scanning the room while talking, occasionally making eye contact
If a student selects D, then he or she would be correct. The problem is this: that knowledge does not make the student a good public speaker. If a teacher truly wants to assess this skill, the student is going to have to actually give a speech to an audience and be evaluated on how effective his or her speaking skills are.
This is the problem for the so-called soft skills
—they are challenging to assess. For example, three people might watch a student’s speech, and one may think the speaker did a really good job, one may think the speaker did an average job, and the third may think the speaker was not very good. The three audience members might be evaluating different things. There is no right or wrong answer, black or white choice, or mastery/nonmastery option. There is a lot of gray area. There are many qualities of presenting a good speech, some the student might do well and other aspects that may need a lot of improvement. How do you assess mastery if there are so many factors involved? To put it simply, the biggest challenge is that there is too much subjectivity in evaluating skills such as this.
You could conduct an assessment that better defines what good public speaking looks like and what the evaluators should be looking for, but this is harder. If I tasked you with writing a multiple-choice test or writing a comprehensive rubric, which one would take you more time and effort to complete? Because of the subjectivity of the rubric, there is some doubt cast as to whether the skill being measured aligns with a SMART goal. After all, SMART goals are supposed to be specific as well as measurable. Creating an objective assessment that properly evaluates these harder-to-measure skills is quite a challenge. This challenge causes a lot of educators to simply take the easy way out and no longer evaluate these skills.
Consider the difference between a multiple-choice assessment and an essay assignment. There are few educators who would argue that multiple-choice responses provide a clearer picture of whether a student understands a concept or not than an essay. After all, on a multiple-choice assessment, there are only three to four choices students must contemplate, and the correct answer is right there in front of them. There’s also the luck factor—a student has a 25% chance of guessing the correct answer. Guessing on an essay question is difficult. A student has to have basic understanding in order to address an essay assignment. Thus, an essay provides a more extensive and detailed look at whether a student has indeed mastered a particular concept or skill. Unfortunately, administering an assessment often comes down to time, that precious commodity that teachers often do not have enough of. If I have a classroom of 30 students, and I administer an assessment with three essay questions on it, suddenly I have to read 90 essays, all of varying length. This is going to take longer than a single planning period. If, however, I give those same 30 students a 20-question multiple-choice assessment, I have considerably cut down the amount of time needed to grade. Because this is the easier path, hard-to-measure skills that require a rubric or more of a time commitment simply get passed over. Instead, we measure those skills that fit into the easy mold of a SMART goal—usually the memorization of content.
First, let me be clear. There is nothing wrong with assessing students’ understanding of content. It serves as the building blocks to higher level conversations. The problem is when content is the only focus of the learning. The unintended consequence is that, because content is knowing a specific fact or method for solving a problem, students then play the memorization game. They memorize the content without understanding the context and when the information should be used. That is where the soft skills come into play. How can you adapt the content in an authentic, real-world situation so that students are not just memorizing the content, but learning it at a much deeper level that will lead to an enduring understanding?
Oftentimes, soft, 21st-century skills, such as …
✓public speaking,
✓collaboration,
✓creativity,
✓critical thinking,
✓adaptability,
✓leadership,
✓problem solving,
✓grit,
✓initiative, and
✓global and social awareness
… get left in the dust or are unintentionally overlooked. There are few people who would argue against the importance of such skills. Educators are aware that students who are skilled in these areas will be much better equipped in the real world than students who only have facts and content memorized. Despite this, many educators focus on the content because that is what is easy to measure and can be quantified into a number, letter grade, or SMART goal.
The ultimate examples of this are Advanced Placement (AP) tests. AP is a national program created by the College Board that offers college-level classes to high schoolers. When a student takes an AP course, in most cases, no matter what the student’s effort is, no matter how well he or she does with ongoing assignments, no matter how good his or her body of work for the class is, the student’s actual results all come down to the AP Exam. If a student comes to class and does not ever use the skills needed to pass a college course, such as initiative, grit, critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, adaptability, or creativity, he or she could still receive college credit if he or she sits