Congressional Districting: The Issue of Equal Representation
By Andrew Hacker and Robert D. Calkins
()
About this ebook
The Court’s decision has raised a number of issues, including the question whether the drive for more equal representation in the state legislatures will affect the United States Congress. The Brookings Institution therefore asked Prof. Andrew Hacker, of the Depart. of Government, Cornell University, to prepare a problem paper that would examine the present congressional districts from the viewpoint of the problems that might arise in connection with reapportionment in the states. The objective was a brief informative analysis drawing largely on available materials, with an early deadline precluding much new research.
Mr. Hacker’s report approaches this subject from several vantage points. Among these are: the constitutional and historical background of congressional districting; state and judicial action as it applies to the Congress; reasons for the disproportion between votes cast and seats won; and the extent and consequences of inequalities in representation in the House of Representatives. Mr. Hacker indicates that the House does not give an equal voice to all of its constituents, and that prevailing inequities may become even more pronounced since the forces opposing reform feel strongly that justice is on their side, and the courts have yet to indicate how far they will go in applying the doctrine of equal representation enunciated in Baker v. Carr—or, indeed, whether they will apply it at all to congressional districts.—Robert Calkins
Andrew Hacker
ANDREW HACKER is the author of the bestselling book Two Nations: Black and White, Separate, Hostile, Unequal, and writes regularly for the New York Review of Books and other publications. He is a professor at Queens College.
Read more from Andrew Hacker
Two Nations: Black and White, Separate, Hostile, Unequal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Math Myth: And Other STEM Delusions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Downfall: The Demise of a President and His Party Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMoney: Who Has How Much and Why Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to Congressional Districting
Related ebooks
Laboratories against Democracy: How National Parties Transformed State Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDisjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlack Votes Count: Political Empowerment in Mississippi After 1965 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCompetition in the Promised Land: Black Migrants in Northern Cities and Labor Markets Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsI Hope I Join the Band: Narrative, Affiliation, and Antiraciset Rhetoric Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The State and Labor in Modern America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Empire to Revolution: Sir James Wright and the Price of Loyalty in Georgia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBuilding the Judiciary: Law, Courts, and the Politics of Institutional Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Big Vote: Gender, Consumer Culture, and the Politics of Exclusion, 1890s–1920s Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDirect Legislation by the Citizenship through the Initiative and Referendum Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Other Women's Movement: Workplace Justice and Social Rights in Modern America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inventing Equal Opportunity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNo Property in Man: Slavery and Antislavery at the Nation’s Founding, With a New Preface Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Legal Realism at Yale, 1927-1960 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen the State Speaks, What Should It Say?: How Democracies Can Protect Expression and Promote Equality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDissent in the Heartland: The Sixties at Indiana University Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Still a House Divided: Race and Politics in Obama's America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWorks Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesolation and Enlightenment: Political Knowledge After Total War, Totalitarianism, and the Holocaust Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMemoirs on Pauperism and Other Writings: Poverty, Public Welfare, and Inequality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNational Duties: Custom Houses and the Making of the American State Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Reconstruction of American Liberalism, 1865-1914 Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Politics of Non-state Social Welfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Not-So-Special Interests: Interest Groups, Public Representation, and American Governance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPerchance to DREAM: A Legal and Political History of the DREAM Act and DACA Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDivided We Stand: American Workers and the Struggle for Black Equality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Wars & Military For You
Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Happiest Man on Earth: The Beautiful Life of an Auschwitz Survivor Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dr. Seuss Goes to War: The World War II Editorial Cartoons of Theodor Seuss Geisel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel: Genius, Power, and Deception on the Eve of World War I Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of the Peloponnesian War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Operator: Firing the Shots that Killed Osama bin Laden and My Years as a SEAL Team Warrior Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Congressional Districting
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Congressional Districting - Andrew Hacker
This edition is published by Papamoa Press – www.pp-publishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – [email protected]
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 1963 under the same title.
© Papamoa Press 2018, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTING
THE ISSUE OF EQUAL REPRESENTATION
BY
ANDREW HACKER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
TABLES 6
THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 7
FOREWORD 9
1—EQUAL VOTES FOR EQUAL CITIZENS? 11
Political Equality and the American Tradition 13
The Constitution: Framers and Ratifiers 14
The Constitution Itself 14
The Philadelphia Convention 15
The Federalist Papers 17
The State Conventions 18
The Democratic Impulse 20
2—THE STATES AND THE JUDICIARY 23
Colegrove’s Cases 23
The State of the States 25
Redistricting: Action and Inaction 26
Rural Votes Compared to Urban Votes 28
Baker v. Carr 29
The Majority Opinion 30
Dissent by Justices Frankfurter and Harlan 31
Rhetoric and Reality 33
Judicial Activism 33
The Meaning of Equity 35
A Civil Rights Question 38
Source of Action on Congressional Redistricting 39
3—POLITICAL CARTOGRAPHY 40
The Single-Member District 41
Varieties of Gerrymandering 44
Excess Votes 45
Wasted Votes 46
Effective Votes and Unequal Districts 47
Gerrymandering at Work: The 1962 Elections 49
New York State 51
California 52
Michigan 55
Summary 57
Motives and Melioration 58
Fair Play in Gerrymandering? 58
Compact Constituencies? 60
4—UNEQUAL REPRESENTATION: CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSEQUENCES 64
Congressional Districts in the 1950’s 64
District Characteristics 66
Party Competition 66
Electoral Participation 67
Standard of Living 68
Party Support 69
Population Composition 70
Consequences for Policy 76
5—THE PROSPECT FOR THE SIXTIES 80
Action and Inaction 81
States Which Did Not Redistrict 81
States Which Gained Seats but Did Not Redistrict 83
States Which Partially Redistricted 84
States Which Completely Redistricted 86
Overall Trends in Redistricting 87
Two Americas: Rural and Suburban 89
The Case for Overrepresentation of Rural America 90
The Suburban Minority 93
Equal Representation: Pro and Con 94
Possible Alternatives, Probable Consequences 96
Congressional Action 96
State Action 97
Judicial Action 98
The Supreme Court and Equal Representation 100
BIBLIOGRAPHY 102
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 104
TABLES
1. Congressional Districts in 42 States: Value of Votes in Smallest District Compared to One Vote in Largest
2. Number and Population of Counties in the United States, 1910 and 1960
3. Lower Houses of State Legislatures: Year of Last Redistricting Before Baker v. Carr and Value of Vote in Smallest District Compared to One Vote in Largest
4. Value of Vote for State Legislature by Size of County, 1910 and 1960
5. Changes in Democratic Statewide Vote compared to Changes in Democratic Congressional Seats, Selected States, 1954-58
6. Relationship of Party's National Congressional Vote to Seats Won in the U. S. House of Representatives, Democrats and Republicans, 1942-62
7. Gerrymandering to Increase the Opposition's Excess Votes, a Hypothetical Case
8. Gerrymandering to Increase the Opposition's Wasted Votes, a Hypothetical Case
9. Gerrymandering Unequal Districts, a Hypothetical Case
10. Voting in 1962 Congressional Elections: New York
11. Voting in 1962 Congressional Elections: California
12. Voting in 1962 Congressional Elections: Michigan
13. Size and Party Competition: 426 Congressional Districts
14. Size and Electoral Participation: 426 Congressional Districts
15. Size and Standard of Living: 426 Congressional Districts
16. Size and Party Support: 426 Congressional Districts
17. Size and Population Composition: 426 Congressional Districts
18. Actual and Weighted Distribution of Congressional Seats: Party Support and Population Composition in 426 Districts
19. Selected Roll-Call Votes, Actual and Weighted, in the 87th Congress
20. Eighteen States Which Neither Gained Nor Lost Congressional Seats and Did Not Redistrict After 1960
21. Four States Which Gained Congressional Seats but Did Not Redistrict After 1960
22. Eleven States Which Gained or Lost Congressional Seats and Partially Redistricted After 1960
23. Nine States Which Changed Every Congressional District After 1960
24. Summary of 413 Congressional Districts, Heldover and New, 88th Congress
25. Congressional Representation: Past Experience and Future Projections
THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION is an independent organization devoted to nonpartisan research, education, and publication in economics, government, foreign policy, and the social sciences generally. Its principal purposes are to aid in the development of sound public policies and to promote public understanding of issues of national importance.
The Institution was founded December 8, 1927, to merge the activities of the Institute for Government Research, founded in 1910, the Institute of Economics, founded in 1922, and the Robert Brookings Graduate School of Economics and Government, founded in 1924.
The general administration of the Institution is the responsibility of a self-perpetuating Board of Trustees. The Trustees are likewise charged with maintaining the independence of the staff and fostering the most favorable conditions for creative research and education. The immediate direction of the policies, program, and staff of the Institution is vested in the President, assisted by the division directors and an advisory council, chosen from the professional staff of the Institution.
In publishing a study, the Institution presents it as a competent treatment of a subject worthy of public consideration. The interpretations and conclusions in such publications are those of the author or authors and do not purport to represent the views of the other staff members, officers, or trustees of the Brookings Institution.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
EUGENE R, BLACK, Chairman
ROBERT BROOKINGS SMITH, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM R. BIGGS, Chairman, Executive Committee
Arthur Stanton Adams
Dillon Anderson
Elliott V. Bell
Louis W. Cabot
Robert D. Calkins
Leonard Carmichael
Thomas H. Carroll
Edward W. Carter
Colgate W. Darden, Jr.
Marion B. Folsom
Gordon Gray
Huntington Harris
David M. Kennedy
John E. Lockwood
H. Chapman Rose
Sydney stein, Jr.
Donald B. Woodward
Honorary Trustees
Daniel W. Bell
Mrs. Robert S. Brookings
Huntington Gilchrist
John Lee Pratt
FOREWORD
THE SUPREME COURT’S decision in the case of Baker v. Carr, handed down in the spring of 1962, opened the way for reform of antiquated and inequitable patterns of representation in state legislatures. Over the ensuing twelve months, districting arrangements have been challenged in many states, and in several of them the legislatures have convened to draw up new districts which better reflect their actual population distribution.
The Court’s decision has raised a number of issues, including the question whether the drive for more equal representation in the state legislatures will affect the United States Congress. The Brookings Institution therefore asked Professor Andrew Hacker, of the Department of Government, Cornell University, to prepare a problem paper that would examine the present congressional districts from the viewpoint of the problems that might arise in connection with reapportionment in the states. The objective was a brief informative analysis drawing largely on available materials, with an early deadline precluding much new research.
Mr. Hacker’s report approaches this subject from several vantage points. Among these are: the constitutional and historical background of congressional districting; state and judicial action as it applies to the Congress; reasons for the disproportion between votes cast and seats won; and the extent and consequences of inequalities in representation in the House of Representatives. Mr. Hacker indicates that the House does not give an equal voice to all of its constituents, and that prevailing inequities may become even more pronounced since the forces opposing reform feel strongly that justice is on their side, and the courts have yet to indicate how far they will go in applying the doctrine of equal representation enunciated in Baker v. Carr—or, indeed, whether they will apply it at all to congressional districts.
The Institution and the author are grateful to those who read and commented on this study while it was in manuscript form. These included George A. Graham, Director of Governmental Studies, and Milton C. Cummings, Jr., Laurin L. Henry, M. Kent Jennings, F. P. Kilpatrick, and Harold Orlans of the Brookings staff; and also Stephen K. Bailey, Frank Munger, and Douglas Price of Syracuse University. Much of the preliminary statistical analysis was done by Mr. Hacker’s students in his Seminar in Political Behavior at Cornell University; this work was checked and organized by Mrs. Jean Curtis of Ithaca, New York. Mrs. Virginia Parker edited the manuscript. Mrs. Helen Eisenhart prepared the index. Final thanks are owed to the indispensable Congressional Quarterly for providing population and voting figures for congressional districts.
The views expressed are those of the author and do not purport to represent the views of the trustees, officers, or other staff members of the Brookings Institution, or of the other readers of the manuscript.
ROBERT D. CALKINS
President
March 1963
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington 6, D.C.
1—EQUAL VOTES FOR EQUAL CITIZENS?
MORE THAN 50 MILLION AMERICANS went to the polls to vote for members of the United States Congress on Tuesday, November 6, 1962. In theory, these Americans were all equal citizens in the eyes of the law; in practice, the votes they cast were not of equal value.
One of the chief determinants of the value of a vote is the size of the district in which a citizen lives. For the question is with how many of his neighbors must he share
his representative in Congress. As an example, take Michigan. According to the 1960 Census, Michigan’s 16th Congressional District had a population of 802,994, whereas its 12th District contained 177,431 people. Thus, the residents of the former constituency had to share their congressman with four and a half times as many people as did those in the latter. Put another way, those living in the 12th District had four and a half times as much representation in Washington, for all congressmen have an equal vote once they are sworn in as members of the House of Representatives. Put still another way, if the residents of the 16th District are regarded as having one vote apiece, their fellow citizens in the 12th District are each able to cast what amounts to four and a half votes. But no matter what phrasing is used a fundamental factor in equality of votes is the size of a district compared with other districts in the same state.
Michigan is not a unique example. In Texas, the congressional district embracing the city of Dallas is over four times as populous as a rural district adjacent to it. In Colorado, the congressional district containing Boulder is more than three times the size of a district at the other end of the state. And in Ohio, the district with Dayton at its center is roughly three times as large as the congressional district in which Zanesville is the largest city. These instances represent glaring disparities in voting power, but only slightly less disturbing disparities are very widespread. Of the 42 states with more than one congressional district after the 1960 Census, exactly half contain constituencies where the vote of a citizen in the smallest congressional district is worth at least twice that of the citizen in the largest district. These states, as well as those with more equitable representation, are shown in Table 1.
Recently, these inequities in congressional apportionment have been receiving increasing attention throughout the country. This has been stimulated by a landmark Supreme Court decision, which dealt, however, with voting for state legislators rather than national representatives. The suit grew out of underrepresentation in Tennessee, where the vote for a representative in the lower house of the state legislature of a citizen living in the smallest district was worth 23 times the vote of the citizen who lived in the largest district.{1} In March 1962, acting on Baker v. Carr, the Supreme Court for the first time ruled that the courts have a responsibility to see that each citizen shall have equal protection of the laws through equal participation in selecting his lawmaker. In its six-to-two decision, however, the Court did not spell out just how equal participation was to be achieved by the states. That was left to the lower courts.
This chapter will be given over to a discussion