Bible Romances, First Series
By G. W. Foote
()
About this ebook
Read more from G. W. Foote
Flowers of Freethought (First Series) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFlowers of Freethought (Second Series) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Book of God : In the Light of the Higher Criticism: With Special Reference to Dean Farrar's New Apology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArrows of Freethought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrisoner for Blasphemy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComic Bible Sketches, Reprinted from "The Freethinker" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBible Romances, First Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Bible Romances, First Series
Related ebooks
Bible Romances, First Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBible Romances Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBible Romances First Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Natural History of Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Biology versus Theology: The Bible: irreconcilable with Science, Experience, and even its own statements Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIt Ain't Necessarily So... Bro Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Planet Earth: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreations Story: Historical Scientific Biblical Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Short History of Planet Earth: Mountains, Mammals, Fire, and Ice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Noah And The Great Flood: proof and effects Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Noah and the Magic Time Formula Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRelics of Primeval Life: Beginning of Life in the Dawn of Geological Time Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBruce's Timeline Of Our World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBible Myths and their Parallels in other Religions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEarth's Deep History: How It Was Discovered and Why It Matters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Destruction of Civilization about 10,500 B.C. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreation: Myth or Miracle?: If There Is a God, Shouldn’t He Be Able to Get the Creation Story Right? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Story of Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Articles of Configuration: The Genesis Project Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSir Norman Lockyer's The dawn of astronomy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecoding Spacetime: The Mathematics of Faith Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Jerusalem Bible New Version Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5371 Days That Scarred Our Planet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Take on the Past: What’s Past Is Prologue: Shakespeare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Spiritual Movements Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLet My People Know; Book 2, A New Creation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Abyss of Time: Unraveling the Mystery of the Earth's Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience of the Bible Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIllogical Geology, the Weakest Point in the Evolution Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Christianity For You
Winning the War in Your Mind: Change Your Thinking, Change Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Unoffendable: How Just One Change Can Make All of Life Better (updated with two new chapters) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I'll Start Again Monday: Break the Cycle of Unhealthy Eating Habits with Lasting Spiritual Satisfaction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5New Morning Mercies: A Daily Gospel Devotional Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love that Lasts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Workbook: When to Say Yes, How to Say No to Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of Enoch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Guess I Haven't Learned That Yet: Discovering New Ways of Living When the Old Ways Stop Working Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Good Girl's Guide to Great Sex: Creating a Marriage That's Both Holy and Hot Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Confessions Of Saint Augustine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Lead When You're Not in Charge: Leveraging Influence When You Lack Authority Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Changes That Heal: Four Practical Steps to a Happier, Healthier You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lost Books of the Bible and The Forgotten Books of Eden Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Holy Bible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Immortality Key: The Secret History of the Religion with No Name Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5It's Not Supposed to Be This Way: Finding Unexpected Strength When Disappointments Leave You Shattered Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Living Resistance: An Indigenous Vision for Seeking Wholeness Every Day Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Evidence That Demands a Verdict: Life-Changing Truth for a Skeptical World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Return of the Gods Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Reflections on the Psalms Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth: Fourth Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doing Life with Your Adult Children: Keep Your Mouth Shut and the Welcome Mat Out Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Free Indeed: My Story of Disentangling Faith from Fear Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Draw the Circle: The 40 Day Prayer Challenge Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Praying Like Monks, Living Like Fools: An Invitation to the Wonder and Mystery of Prayer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unwanted: How Sexual Brokenness Reveals Our Way to Healing Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dragon's Prophecy: Israel, the Dark Resurrection, and the End of Days Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Bible Romances, First Series
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Bible Romances, First Series - G. W. Foote
G. W. Foote
Bible Romances, First Series
Published by Good Press, 2022
EAN 4057664565662
Table of Contents
THE CREATION STORY.
BIBLE ROMANCES.—1.
NOAH'S FLOOD.
BIBLE ROMANCES—2.
EVE AND THE APPLE.
BIBLE ROMANCES.-3.
THE BIBLE DEVIL.
BIBLE ROMANCES.—4.
THE TEN PLAGUES;
Or, HOW MOSES HARRIED EGYPT.
JONAH AND THE WHALE.
BIBLE ROMANCES.—6.
THE WANDERING JEWS.
BIBLE ROMANCES.-VII.
THE TOWER OF BABEL.
BIBLE ROMANCES.—VIII.
BALAAM'S ASS.
BIBLE ROMANCES.—IX.
GOD'S THIEVES IN CANAAN.
BIBLE ROMANCES.—X.
CAIN AND ABEL.
BIBLE ROMANCES.—11.
LOT'S WIFE.
BIBLE ROMANCES.—12.
THE CREATION STORY.
Table of Contents
BIBLE ROMANCES.—1.
Table of Contents
By G. W. FOOTE.
The Book of Genesis is generally thought, as Professor Huxley says, to contain the beginning and the end of sound science. The mythology of the Jews is held to be a divine revelation of the early history of man, and of the cosmic changes preparatory to his creation. The masses of the people in every Christian country are taught in their childhood that God created the universe, including this earth with all its flora and fauna, in five days; that he created man, the bright consummate flower
of his work, on the sixth day, and rested on the seventh. Yet every student knows this conception to be utterly false; every man of science rejects it as absurd; and even the clergy themselves mostly disbelieve it Why, then, do they not disabuse the popular mind, and preach what they deem true instead of what they know to be false? The answer is very simple. Because they feel that the doctrine of the Fall is bound up with the Genesaic account of Creation, and that if the latter be discredited the former will not long be retained. The doctrine of the Fall being the foundation of the scheme of Atonement, the clergy will never admit the Creation Story to be mythical until they are forced to do so by external pressure. At any rate they cannot be expected to proclaim its falsity, since by so doing they would destroy the main prop of their power. What the recognised teachers of religion will not do, however, should not be left undone, especially when it is so needful and important. Men of science, by teaching positive and indisputable truths, are gradually but surely revolutionising the world of thought, and dethroning the priesthoods of mystery and superstition. Yet their influence on the masses is indirect, and they do not often trouble themselves to show the contradiction between their discoveries and what is preached from the pulpit. Perhaps they are right. But it is also right that others should appeal to the people in the name not only of science, but also of scholarship and common sense, and show them the incredible absurdity of much that the clergy are handsomely paid to preach as the veritable and infallible Word of God.
The Creation Story, with which the Book of Genesis opens, is incoherent, discrepant, and intrinsically absurd, as we shall attempt to show. It is also discordant with the plainest truths of Science. Let us examine it, after casting aside all prejudice and predilection.
If the universe, including this earth and its principal inhabitant, man, was created in six days, it follows that less than six thousand years ago chaos reigned throughout nature. This, however, is clearly untrue. Our earth has revolved round its central sun for numberless millions of years. Geology proves also that million years have elapsed since organic existence first appeared on the earth's surface, and this world became the theatre of life and death. Darwin speaks of the known history of the world as of a length quite incomprehensible by us,
yet even that he affirms will hereafter be recognised as a mere fragment of time
com-pared with the vast periods which Biology will demand. The instructed members of the Church have long recognised these-statements as substantially true, and they have tried to reconcile them with Scripture by assuming that the word which in the History of Creation is rendered day really means a period, that is an elastic space of time which may be expanded or contracted to suit all requirements. But there are two fatal objections to this assumption. In the first place, the same word is rendered day in the fourth commandment, and if it means period in Genesis it means period in Exodus. In that case we are commanded to work six periods and rest on the seventh, and each period must cover a geological epoch. How pleasant for those who happen to be born in the seventh period, how unpleasant for those born in one of the six! The lives of the one class all work, those of the other all play! In the second place, the account of each day's creation concludes with the refrain and the evening and the morning were the first (or other) day.
Now evening and morning are terms which mark the luminous gradations between night and day, and these phenomena, like night and day, depend on the earth's revolving on its axis and presenting different portions of its surface to the sun. Evening and morning clearly imply a space of twenty-four hours, and the writer of Genesis, whoever he was, would probably be surprised at any other interpretation of his words. It is sometimes argued, as for instance by Dr. M'Caul, that these primeval days were of vast and unknown duration, the evening and the morning not being dependent on their present causes. But this supposition could only apply to the first three days, for the sun, moon, and stars were created on the fourth day, expressly to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness.
The fifth and sixth days, at least, must be understood as of normal length, and thus the chronological difficulties remain. All animal life was brought into existence on the last two days, and therefore the Bible still allows an antiquity of less than six thousand years for the world's fauna. Geology and Biology allow millions of years. Here then Science and the Bible are in flagrant and irreconcilable contradiction.
The fact that the writer of Genesis represents light as existing three days before the creation of the sun, the source of light, has frequently been noticed. One learned commentator supposed that God had infused a certain luminosity
through the air, which was not exactly the same as the light of the sun. But light is not a thing; it is a phenomenon caused by definite laws of astronomy and optics. Such explanations are but fanciful refuges of superstition. God said let there be light and there was light,
is not the language of science and history, but the language of poetry. As such it is sublime. We find a similar expression in the Vedas of the Hindoos: He thought, I will create worlds, and they were there!
Both become ridiculous when presented to us as a scientific statement The physical astronomer knows how worlds are formed, as well as how their movements are determined; he knows also the causes of light; and he knows that none of these processes resembles the accounts given in the Creation Stories of the Hebrews and the Hindoos.
Science knows nothing of six creative epochs, any more than of six creative days; and it is quite certain that the order of Creation given in Genesis differs widely from the revelations of Geology. For instance (and one instance in such a case is as good as a thousand), fish and fowl are said to have been created on the same day. Let us, for the sake of argument, assume that day means period. The conclusion still is that fish and fowl were created together. Starting from this conclusion, what should we expect to find in our geological researches? Why, the fossil remains of fish and of fowl in the same epochs. But we find nothing of the kind. Marine animals antedate the carboniferous period, during which all our coal deposits were laid, but no remains of fowl are found until a later period. Now the carboniferious period alone, according to Sir William Thompson, covers many millions of years; so that instead of fish and fowl being contemporaneous, we find them geologically separated by inconceivable spaces of time. Here again the Bible and Science fatally disagree.
Even if we admit that the fifth day of creation was a period, the chronology of the Bible is still fatally at variance with fact With respect to the antiquity of the human race, it is precise and unmistakable. It gives us the age of Adam at his death, and the ages of the other antediluvian patriarchs. From the Flood the genealogies are carefully recorded, until we enter the historic period, after which there is not much room for dispute. From the creation of Adam to the birth of Christ, the Bible allows about four thousand years. The antiquity of the human race, therefore, according to Scripture, is less than six thousand years. Science, however, proves that this is but a fragment of the vast period during which man has inhabited the earth. There was a civilisation in Egypt thousands of years before the alleged creation of Adam. The Cushite civilisation was even more ancient Archaeology shows us traces of man's presence, in a ruder state, long before that. The researches of Mr. Pengelly in Kent's Cavern prove that cave-men lived there more than two-hundred thousand years ago; while geological investigations in the Valley of the Somme have established the fact that primitive men existed there in the tertiary period. Professor Draper writes:—"So far as investigations have gone, they indisputably-refer the existence of man to a date remote from us by many hundreds of thousands of years. It must be borne in mind that these investigations are quite recent, and confined to a very limited geographical space. No researches have yet been made in those regions which might reasonably be regarded as the primitive habitat of man. We are thus carried back immeasurably beyond the six thousand years of Patristic chronology. It is difficult to assign a shorter date for the last glaciation of Europe than a quarter of a million of years, and human existence antedates that. The chronology of the Bible is thus altogether obsolete."
The idea of a seven-days' creation was not confined to the Jews: it was shared by the Persians and Etruscans. The division of the year into months and weeks is a general, although not a universal practice. The ancient Egyptians observed a ten-days' week, but the seven-days' week was well known to them. The naming of the days of the week after the seven Planets was noted by Dion Cassius as originally an Egyptian custom, which spread from Egypt into the Roman Empire. The Brahmins of India also distinguish the days of the week by the planetary names. This division of time was purely astronomical. The Jews kept the Feast of the New Moon, and other of their ceremonies were determined by lunar and solar phenomena. We may be sure that the myth of a seven-days' creation followed and did not precede the regular observance of that period.
There is one feature of the Hebrew story of creation which shows how anthropomorphic they were. The Persians represent Ormuzd as keeping high festival with his angels on the seventh day, after creating all things in six. But the Hebrews represent Jehovah as resting on the seventh day, as though the arduous labors of creation had completely exhausted his energies. Fancy Omnipotence requiring rest to recruit its strength! The Bible, and especially in its earlier parts, is grossly anthropomorphic. It exhibits God as conversing with men, sharing their repasts, and helping them to slaughter their foes. It represents him as visible to human eyes, and in one instance as giving Moses a back view of his person. Yet these childish fancies are still thrust upon as divine truths, which if we disbelieve we shall be eternally damned!
Let us now examine the Creation Story internally. In the first place we find two distinct records, the one occupying the whole of the first chapter of Genesis and the first three verses of the second, at which point the other commences. These two records belong to different periods of Jewish history. The older one is the Elohistic, so called because the creator is designated by the plural term Elohim, which in our version is translated God. The more modern one is the Jehovistic, in which Elohim is combined with the singular term Jehovah, translated in our-version the Lord God. The Elohistic and Jehovistic accounts both relate the creation of man, but instead of agreeing they widely differ. The former makes God create man in his own image; the latter does not even allude to this important circumstance. The former represents man as created male and female at the outset; the latter represents the male as created first, and the female for a special reason afterwards. In the former God enjoins the primal pair to be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth;
in the latter there is no such injunction, but on the contrary, the bringing forth of children in sorrow is imposed upon the woman as a punishment for her sin, and she does not appear to have borne any offspring until after the expulsion from the Garden of Eden. Lastly, the Elohistic record makes no mention of this Paradise, in which, according to the Jehovistic record, the drama of the Fall was enacted, but represents man as immediately commissioned to subdue and populate the world. Such discrepancies are enough to stagger the blindest credulity.
We now proceed to examine the Jehovistic account of Creation in detail. We read that the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, the Hebrew word for which is adamah. The word Adam means be red,
and adamah may be referred to the red soil of Palestine. Kalisch also observes that man may have been originally called Adam on account of the red color of