Priestley in America, 1794-1804
()
About this ebook
Read more from Edgar Fahs Smith
James Cutbush, an American Chemist, 1788-1823 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPriestley in America, 1794-1804 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Priestley in America, 1794-1804
Related ebooks
Science & Education: Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience and Education (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Enlightened Joseph Priestley: A Study of His Life and Work from 1773 to 1804 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Food of the Gods and How It Came to Earth: “Our true nationality is mankind.” Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Pagan and Christian Creeds - Their Origin and Meaning Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Lay Sermons, Addresses and Reviews Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStrong Drink and Tobacco Smoke - The Structure, Growth, and Uses of Malt, Hops, Yeast, and Tobacco Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Odd Couple: Francis Bacon and Rudolf Steiner Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Naturalist in Nicaragua Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Old Humanities and the New Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVictorian Interdisciplinarity and the Sciences: Rethinking the Specialization Thesis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistory of English Literature Volume 1 (of 3): (Illustrated Edition) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Voice of Science: British Scientists on the Lecture Circuit in Gilded Age America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Advisableness of Improving Natural Knowledge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNot Paul, But Jesus Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Memoirs of the Distinguished Men of Science of Great Britain Living in the Years 1807-8 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEngland in the Restoration and Early Eighteenth Century: Essays on Culture and Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Century of Science and Other Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEtidorhpa; or, The End of Earth: The Strange History of a Mysterious Being and the Account of a Remarkable Journey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Inner House Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bavarian Illuminati: The Rise and Fall of the World's Most Secret Society Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Greatest Works of Immanuel Kant Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Greatest Works of Immanuel Kant: Complete Critiques, Philosophical Works & Essays (Including Inaugural Dissertation & Biography) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLife of Thomas Paine Written Purposely to Bind with his Writings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Collected Works of Immanuel Kant Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe History of England: Volume I Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMagisteria: The Entangled Histories of Science & Religion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Surprising Mystics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Miscellany of Literature, Art and Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, Oct. 1, 1850 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction Volume 13 — Index to Volume 13 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reference For You
The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51,001 Facts that Will Scare the S#*t Out of You: The Ultimate Bathroom Reader Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Liespotting: Proven Techniques to Detect Deception Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51001 First Lines Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Spy the Lie: Former CIA Officers Teach You How to Detect Deception Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Everything Sign Language Book: American Sign Language Made Easy... All new photos! Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Elements of Style, Fourth Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Legal Words You Should Know: Over 1,000 Essential Terms to Understand Contracts, Wills, and the Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mythology 101: From Gods and Goddesses to Monsters and Mortals, Your Guide to Ancient Mythology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Emotion Thesaurus (Second Edition): A Writer's Guide to Character Expression Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5THE EMOTIONAL WOUND THESAURUS: A Writer's Guide to Psychological Trauma Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bored Games: 100+ In-Person and Online Games to Keep Everyone Entertained Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Show, Don't Tell: How to Write Vivid Descriptions, Handle Backstory, and Describe Your Characters’ Emotions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Learn Sign Language in a Hurry: Grasp the Basics of American Sign Language Quickly and Easily Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell - A Story Grid Masterwork Analysis Guide Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Robert's Rules For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 365 Bullet Guide: Organize Your Life Creatively, One Day at a Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Book of Card Games: The Complete Rules to the Classics, Family Favorites, and Forgotten Games Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFifty Shades Trilogy by E.L. James (Book Analysis): Detailed Summary, Analysis and Reading Guide Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related categories
Reviews for Priestley in America, 1794-1804
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Priestley in America, 1794-1804 - Edgar Fahs Smith
Edgar Fahs Smith
Priestley in America, 1794-1804
Published by Good Press, 2022
EAN 4064066225711
Table of Contents
Cover
Titlepage
PREFACE
PRIESTLEY IN AMERICA
1012 WALNUT STREET
THE MAPLE PRESS YORK PA
PREFACE
Table of Contents
The writer, in studying the lives of early American chemists, encountered the name of Joseph Priestley so frequently, that he concluded to institute a search with the view of learning as much as possible of the life and activities, during his exile in this country, of the man whom chemists everywhere deeply revere. Recourse, therefore, was had to contemporary newspapers, documents and books, and the resulting material woven into the sketch given in the appended pages. If nothing more, it may be, perhaps, a connecting chapter for any future history of chemistry in America. Its preparation has been a genuine pleasure, which, it is hoped by him whose hand guided the pen, will be shared by his fellow chemists, and all who are interested in the growth and development of science in this country.
PRIESTLEY IN AMERICA
Table of Contents
There lies before the writer a tube of glass, eleven and one half inches in length and a quarter of an inch in diameter. Its walls are thin. At one end there is evidence that an effort was made to bend this tube in the flame. Ordinarily it would be tossed aside; but this particular tube was given the writer years ago by a great-grandson of Joseph Priestley. Attached to the tube is a bit of paper upon which appear the words piece of tubing used by Priestley.
That legend has made the tube precious in the heart and to the eye of the writer. Everything relating to this wonderful figure in science, history, religion, politics and philosophy is very dear to him. On all sides of him are relics and reminders of Priestley. Not all, but many of his publications are near at hand. After perusal of these at various times, and while reading the many life sketches of Priestley, there has come the desire to know more about his activities during the decade (1794-1804) he lived in America. Isn't it fair to declare that the great majority of chemical students think of Priestley as working only in England, his native land, and never give thought to his efforts during the last ten years of his life? It has been said that he probably inspired and incited the young chemists of this country to renewed endeavor in their science upon his advent here. There is no question that he influenced James Woodhouse and his particular confreres most profoundly, as he did a younger generation, represented by Robert Hare. Priestley again set in rapid motion chemical research in the young Republic.[1] He must therefore have done something himself. What was it? Is it worth while to learn the character of this work? Modern tendencies are antagonistic to the past. Many persons care nothing for history. It is a closed book. They do not wish it to be opened, and yet the present is built upon the early work. In reviewing the development of chemistry in this country everything, from the first happening here, should be laid upon the table for study and reflection. Thus believing, it will not be out of place to seek some light upon the occupation of the discoverer of oxygen after he came to live among us—with our fathers.
Noble-hearted, sympathetic Thomas E. Thorpe wrote:
If, too, as you draw up to the fire 'betwixt the gloaming and the mirk' of these dull, cold November days, and note the little blue flame playing round the red-hot coals, think kindly of Priestley, for he first told us of the nature of that flame when in the exile to which our forefathers drove him.
Right there, the nature of the flame,
is one thing Priestley did explain in America. He discovered carbon monoxide—not in England, but in exile.
[2] It may not be an epoch-making observation. There are not many such and those who make them are not legion in number. It was an interesting fact, with a very definite value, which has persisted through many succeeding decades and is so matter-of-fact that rarely does one arise to ask who first discovered this simple oxide of carbon.
Priestley was a man of strong human sympathies. He loved to mingle with men and exchange thoughts. Furthermore, Priestley was a minister—a preacher. He was ordained while at Warrington, and gloried in the fact that he was a Dissenting Minister. It was not his devotion to science which sent him into exile.
His advanced thought along political and religious lines, his unequivocal utterances on such subjects,—proved to be the rock upon which he shipwrecked. It has been said—
By some strange irony of fate this man, who was by nature one of the most peaceable and peace-loving of men, singularly calm and dispassionate, not prone to disputation or given to wrangling, acquired the reputation of being perhaps the most cantankerous man of his time....
There is a wide-spread impression that Priestley was a chemist. This is the answer which invariably comes from the lips of students upon being interrogated concerning him. The truth is that Priestley's attention was only turned to chemistry when in the thirties by Matthew Turner, who lectured on this subject in the Warrington Academy in which Priestley labored as a teacher. So he was rather advanced in life before the science he enriched was revealed to him in the experimental way. Let it again be declared, he was a teacher. His thoughts were mostly those of a teacher. Education occupied him. He wrote upon it. The old Warrington Academy was a hot-bed of liberal dissent,
and there were few subjects upon which he did not publicly declare himself as a dissenter.
He learned to know our own delightful Franklin in one of his visits to London. Franklin was then sixty years of age, while Priestley was little more than half his age. A warm friendship immediately sprang up. It reacted powerfully upon Priestley's work as a political thinker and as a natural philosopher.
In short, Franklin made Priestley into a man of science.
This intimacy between these remarkable men should not escape American students. Recall that positively fascinating letter (1788) from Franklin to Benjamin Vaughan, in which occur these words:
Remember me affectionately ... to the honest heretic Dr. Priestley. I do not call him honest by way of distinction, for I think all the heretics I have known have been virtuous men. They have the virtue of Fortitude, or they would not venture to own their heresy; and they cannot afford to be deficient in any of the other virtues, as that would give advantage to their many enemies.... Do not however mistake me. It is not to my good friend's heresy that I impute his honesty. On the contrary 'tis his honesty that has brought upon him the character of heretic.
Much of Priestley's thought was given to religious matters. In Leeds he acknowledged himself a humanitarian, or
a believer in the doctrine that Jesus Christ was in nature solely and truly a man, however highly exalted by God.
His home in Leeds adjoined a public brew house.
He there amused himself with experiments on carbon dioxide (fixed air). Step by step he became strongly attracted to experimentation. His means, however, forbade the purchase of apparatus and he was obliged to devise the same and also to think out his own methods of attack. Naturally, his apparatus was simple. He loved to repeat experiments, thus insuring their accuracy.
In 1772 he published his first paper on Pneumatic Chemistry. It told of the impregnation of water with carbon dioxide. It attracted attention and was translated into French. This soda-water paper won for Priestley the Copley medal (1773). While thus signally honored he continued publishing views on theology and metaphysics. These made a considerable uproar.
Then came the memorable year of 1774—the birth-year of oxygen. How many chemists, with but two years in the science, have been so fortunate as to discover an element, better still probably the most important of all the elements! It was certainly a rare good fortune! It couldn't help but make him the observed among observers. This may have occasioned the hue and cry against his polemical essays on government and church to become more frequent and in some instances almost furious.
It was now that he repaired to London. Here he had daily intercourse with Franklin, whose encouragement prompted him to go bravely forward in his adopted course.
It was in 1780 that he took up his residence in Birmingham. This was done at the instance of his brother-in-law. The atmosphere was most congenial and friendly. Then, he was most desirous of resuming his ministerial duties; further, he would have near at hand good workmen to aid him in the preparation of apparatus for his philosophical pursuits. Best of all his friends were there, including those devoted to science. Faujar St. Fond, a French geologist has recorded a visit to Priestley—
Dr. Priestley received me with the greatest kindness.... The building in which Dr. Priestley made his chemical and philosophical experiments was detached from