Planning Monitoring and Evaluation for Public and Private Sectors
()
About this ebook
How often have we ignored monitoring and evaluation – as if appreciating our little efforts, is of no significance? This book is a timely contribution to an ongoing debate about the need for accountability and transparency in whatever we do – whether we are development practitioners, policy makers, researchers and all those working in the public, private and third sector organisations. A truly stimulating piece of work which students of Development Studies will find it equally informative. The Covid-19 Outbreaks have demonstrated that we are not yet there where systems and processes are in place to plan, monitor and evaluate. If empowerment programmes are managed, monitored and evaluated in ways that are top-down, technocratic and controlling, governments’, private sectors’ and donors’ actions can have unintended disempowering effects.
Planning Monitoring and Evaluation continue to be a fundamental 2063 Africa agenda promoting accountability, effectiveness and efficiency in Local government and all spheres of government. Skilling, up skilling and reskilling in Planning M and E should become business as usual in any organisation.
Related to Planning Monitoring and Evaluation for Public and Private Sectors
Related ebooks
A Guide to Project Monitoring & Evaluation Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Monitoring, Evaluating, and Improving: An Evidence-Based Approach to Achieving Development Results that Matter! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMonitoring, Evaluation and Research Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEvaluation for Better Results Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Strategic Planning Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImplementing Organizational Project Management: A Practice Guide Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Middle Managers in Program and Project Portfolio Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeveloping Government Policy Capability: Policy Work, Project Management, and Knowledge Practices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChallenges and Best Practices of Managing Government Projects and Programs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMonitoring And Evaluation A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Monitoring & Evaluation for Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMonitoring and evaluation Skills Complete Self-Assessment Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMonitoring and evaluation Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBuilding Better Policies: The Nuts and Bolts of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImpact Evaluation of Development Interventions: A Practical Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSuccessful Program Evaluation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsActionable Evaluation Basics: Getting succinct answers to the most important questions [minibook] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Manager's Guide to Program Evaluation: Planning, Contracting, & Managing for Useful Results Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Knowledge for Development: A Blueprint for Successful Knowledge Management in Government Organizations: 1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Performance Audit A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMastering Project Management: A Comprehensive Guide to Delivering Successful Projects: Course, #7 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Doctor of Business Administration: Taking your professional practice to the next level Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHandbook for Monitoring and Evaluation of Child Labour in Agriculture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRethink! Project Stakeholder Management Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Guidelines for Preparing and Using a Design and Monitoring Framework: Sovereign Operations and Technical Assistance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBenchmarking for Nonprofits: How to Measure, Manage, and Improve Performance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Maximizing Project Success through Human Performance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Manage a Research Project: Achieve Your Goals on Time and Within Budget Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Business For You
Becoming Bulletproof: Protect Yourself, Read People, Influence Situations, and Live Fearlessly Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Law of Connection: Lesson 10 from The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, 3rd Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Collaborating with the Enemy: How to Work with People You Don't Agree with or Like or Trust Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Crucial Conversations Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High, Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes are High, Third Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable, 20th Anniversary Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Richest Man in Babylon: The most inspiring book on wealth ever written Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Robert's Rules Of Order Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Intelligent Investor, Rev. Ed: The Definitive Book on Value Investing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grant Writing For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Your Next Five Moves: Master the Art of Business Strategy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Writing Well, 30th Anniversary Edition: An Informal Guide to Writing Nonfiction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of J.L. Collins's The Simple Path to Wealth Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Carol Dweck's Mindset The New Psychology of Success: Summary and Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Emotional Intelligence: Exploring the Most Powerful Intelligence Ever Discovered Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Just Listen: Discover the Secret to Getting Through to Absolutely Anyone Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Energy Bus: 10 Rules to Fuel Your Life, Work, and Team with Positive Energy Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Everything Guide To Being A Paralegal: Winning Secrets to a Successful Career! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Financial Words You Should Know: Over 1,000 Essential Investment, Accounting, Real Estate, and Tax Words Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Money. Wealth. Life Insurance. Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat: The BRRRR Rental Property Investment Strategy Made Simple Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Grow Your Small Business: A 6-Step Plan to Help Your Business Take Off Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for Planning Monitoring and Evaluation for Public and Private Sectors
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Planning Monitoring and Evaluation for Public and Private Sectors - Dr Christopher Phiri
Planning Monitoring and Evaluation for
Public and Private Sectors
Planning Monitoring and Evaluation for
Public and Private Sectors
Up-Skilling and Re-skilling of 21st Century Government, Academic, NGOs and Private practitioners
Christopher Phiri PhD
Charles Chimombo MSc Strategic Management
Copyright © 2021 Christopher Phiri PhD and Charles Chimombo
First edition 2021
Published by Christopher Phiri PhD and Charles Chimombo Publishing at Smashwords
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without permission from the copyright holder.
The Author has made every effort to trace and acknowledge sources/resources/individuals. In the event that any images/information have been incorrectly attributed or credited, the Author will be pleased to rectify these omissions at the earliest opportunity.
Editors
Professor Learn more Kambizi Cape Peninsula University of Technology
Professor Serestina Viriri University of KwaZulu Natal
Ms. Desiree Johnson National Department of Social Development
Professor Jonathan Makuwira Deputy Vice Chancellor Malawi University of Science and Technology
Authors
Dr Christopher Phiri is a seasoned Author, a Strategic Planning, Design, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation practitioner in the Public sector, Academic and NGO space. He has extensive experience in strategy planning, M and E for socio-economic development. An Anthropologist, Philanthropist and A Policy Analyst who has trained, mentored, and coached professionals, communities and Public and private sector on M and E and its application. He has provided strategic support to Public and Private sector in South Africa and is a seasoned Academic in Monitoring and Evaluation.
Charles Chimombo is a humanitarian by heart and actions, an international monitoring and evaluation maestro as well as an expert in community development with more than ten (10) years of work experience in international nongovernmental organizations. He has left indelible footprints in Public Health and Nutrition, Disaster Risk Management including Natural Resource Management, Livelihoods, Agriculture and Food Security, Education and Literacy, Gender and advocacy, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), Child protection and HIV/AIDS. The Director of Operations for World Vision Malawi and holds Bachelors degree in Human and Social Studies, Masters of Science degree in Strategic Management and currently enrolled for a Masters in Public Health.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgement
Declaration
Foreword
Acronmys
1. Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
1.1 Introduction
1.2 The Changing Context of M&E
1.3 Common Tools and Approaches
1.4 Conclusion
2. Monitoring and Evaluation in Government and Development Sectors
2.1 Monitoring and Evaluation in development
2.1.1 The Process of developing the M and E book
2.1.2 Institutional M&E System Assessment
2.1.3 The design of the M and E Book
2.1.4 By Who and by when should this M&E book be used?
2.2 Conclusion
3. Theory of Change and Its Applicability
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 The Politics in Monitoring and Evaluation
3.1.2 Importance of Assumptions in developing TOC
3.2 Defining Theory of change from our perspective
3.2.1 Benefits of Theory of Change
3.2.2 Key principles for developing a theory of change
3.2.3 Key steps for developing a theory of change
3.2.4 Key steps for developing a theory of change that we have used over time
3.2.5 Step 1: Revise Negative Statements:
3.2.6 Step 2: Rewrite into possible solutions:
3.2.7 Step 3: Identify positive solutions:
3.3 A Theory of Change
3.4 This can be Descirbed as
3.4.2 Illustration of Theory Of Change
3.5 Theory of Change statement.
3.6 Development of Indicators in the Planning Process
3.6 Strategic Plans
3.7 Conclusion
4. Agenda 2030 National Development Plan
4.1 Importance of Planning, Training, Monitoring and Evaluation
4.2 Improved leadership, governance and accountability
4.3 Functional, efficient and integrated government
4.4 Professional, meritocratic and ethical public administration
4.5 Social compact and engagement with key stakeholders
4.6 Mainstreaming of gender, empowerment of youth and people with disabilities
4.7 The role of M and E in catalysing Performance Management and service delivery
4.8 Conclusion
5. Project Management Monitoring And Evaluation
5.1 Introduction
5.2 The Changing Context of M&E
5.3 What is Project Monitoring?
5.4 What is Project Evaluation?
5.5 What is the difference between Monitoring and Evaluation?
5.6 Why do we need to Monitor and Evaluate Projects?
5.7 What will contribute to successful Project Monitoring and Evaluation?
5.8 Conclusion
6. Project Planning
6.1 Introduction
6.1.1 The benefits of planning
6.1.2 Frustrations of Middle Management and Junior officials
6.2 What is Project Planning?
2.3 What are the Steps that are followed in Project Planning?
6.4 What are the key considerations during Project Planning?
6.5 Conclusion
7. Project Implementation And Monitoring
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 What is Project Implementation?
7.1.2 Project Monitoring
7.1.3 The importance of Project objectives
7.1.4 What indicators will measure project success?
7.1.5 What is the process of developing indicators?
7.1.6 What methods and tools will be used to gather project data or information?
7.1.7 Steps in collecting Monitoring data and Evaluation data or information
7.2 Conclusion
8. Project Evaluations
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Steps involved in the Planning and Implementation of a Baseline or Evaluation Survey
8.2.2 Step 1: Planning for Baseline and Evaluation Surveys (Ante evaluation, Summative, Formative and impact evaluation)
8.2.3 Step 2: Training of Baseline/Evaluation Survey Team
8.2.4 Step 3: Pre-testing and sampling approach
8.2.5 Step 4: Collect the data
8.2.6 Step 5: Data coding, Entry and Cleaning
8.2.7. Step 6: Analyse the Data
8.2.8 Step 7: Compile the Key findings and Draft Report
8.2.9 Step 8: Share the results
8.2.10 Step 9: Prepare Final Baseline or Evaluation Report
8.2.11 Step 10: Revise Program Planning/Design
8.3 Types of evaluation and evaluation processes
8.3.2 Impact evaluation
8.3.3 Ante ex evaluation
8.3.4 Operational evaluation
8.3.5 Process evaluation
8.3.6 Evaluation Processes
8.3.7 Outcome evaluation
8.4 Conclusion
9. Developmental Evaluation
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Clarifications on Developmental Evaluation Myths
9.3 Collecting data through Developmental Evaluation
9.4 Sustainability through building evaluation capacity
9.5 Conclusion
10. Managing Issues During Monitoring And Evaluation
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Use of the Monitoring and Evaluation Information
10.3 What is a project Logframe?
10.4 Why do you need a project Logframe?
10.4.1 10 Steps you need to follow in the development of a Logframe
10.5 What is a Performance Monitoring or M & E Plan?
10.6 Steps you need to consider in the development of a PMP
10.7 Steps you need to consider in the development of an IPTT
11. Results Based Management for Public and Private Sectors
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Some Background
11.3 Over The 13 Years I Have Learnt That Too Much Complexity In The Data Collection System And Performance Measurement Is The Major Obstacle To The Efficient Implementation Of Rbm.
11.4 Result Based Management approach
11.5 Tips for priority setting
11.6 Crafting results statements
11.7 Importance of Indicators
11.8 Risk Management
11.9 Conclusion
12. Capacity Building for Monitoring and Evalaution
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Integrated, Multi-level Strategies for Capacity Building
12.3 Conclusion
13. Participatory Monitoring And Evaluation
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Government or Donor pressure
13.3 Participatory M and E model
13.3.1 Approaches to PM&E
13.4 Designing PME Systems
13.5 Conditions Necessary for PME
13.6 Checklist for Designing a PME System
13.7 Conclusion
14. Monitoring the Implementation of Collective Agreements in the Public Service
14.1 Introduction
14.1.1 The Labour Relations Act
14.1.2 The role of Trade Unions in the Public service
14.1.3 The role of the SA government as employer in Labour Relations
14.1.4 The establishment and role of PSCBC
14.1.5 The Collective Agreements
14.2 Discussions
14.2.1 The future of Labour Relations
14.3 Conclusion
15. The Role of Private and Public Sectors in Advancing M and E
15.1 Introduction
15.2 Difficulties with donor procedures
15.2.1 Government and Donors should be more transparent
15.2.2 Guiding principles on providing coordinated aid
15.2.3 Multi-year funding commitments
15.2.4 An open process for managing any concerns
15.2.5 Consult with partner governments:
15.3 Conclusion
16. Challenges in Implementing Monitoring and Evaluation ProcesseS
16.1 Introduction
16.2 M and E challenges faced by the government
16.2.1 Reflective Practice Competence challenges
16.2.2 Lack of adequate and skilled personnel in M&E
16.2.3 Absence of a learning culture
16.2.4 Monitoring and evaluation is ‘donor driven’
16.2.5 Inadequate Attention To M And E During Program/Project Design
16.2.6 Lack of participation of stakeholders in the development of M&E systems
16.2.6 Lack of contextualizing M and E systems
16.3 Managing practice competence challenges
16.4 Conclusion
17. Government Wide Monitoring and Evaluation
17.1 Introduction
17.2 System users and their needs
17.3 System aims, objectives and intended results
17.4 Performance indicators and sources of information
17.5 System Reports and their utilisation
17.6 Roles and responsibilities
17.7 Critique of GWME as applied in South Africa
17.8 Conclusion
18. Change Management ‘MYTH or REALITY’
18.1 Introduction
18.2 Critical questions to ponder:
18.3 The Prosci 3-Phase Process
18.3.1 Phase 1 – Prepare Approach
18.3.2 Phase 2 – Manage Change
18.3.3 Phase 3 – Sustain Outcomes
18.3.4 Get the Buy-in You Need
18.3.5 Track the Change
18.3.6 Support Open Communication
18.3.7 Monitoring the implementation of change
18.3.8 Reflection point
18.4 Eight ways to manage change in the workplace effectively
18.5 Six Steps to Effective Organizational Change Management
18.6 Conclusion
19. COVID 19 Pandemic, Disaster Management and Monitoring
19.1 Introduction
19.2 Strengths and weaknesses
19.3 Overview on M and E during disaster
19.4 Country Case Studies
19.4.1 South Africa During the Covid-19 pandemic
19.4.2 Lessons Learnt from the Ebola Experience
19.4.3 The politics of Covid 19 across the globe
19.4.4 Reflections
19.4.5 Monitoring Process from an NGO sector (adopted from World Vision International 2020)
19.4.6 Conclusion
20. Conclusion
20.1 External context
20.2 Beyond policy formulation
20.3 Conclusive comments on M and E Training
Bibliography
List of Tables
Table 1: Guideline of Theory of Change Testing Guidelines
Table 2: Stakeholder matrix
Table 3: Stakeholder Analysis Matrix
Table 4: The importance of different stakeholders to the potential Food security project
Table 5: Example of a Project Planning Matrix Model for WALA Project
Table 6: characteristics of good indicators
Table 7: Developmental evaluation application guide
Table 8: Types of Indicators
Table 9: Conventional and Participatory Evaluations
Table 10: Monitoring Process from an NGO sector
List of Figures
Figure 1: Theory of Change template
Figure 2: Source: World Vision Change management 2012
Figure 3: The Seven Steps of Project Planning Process
Figure 4: Problem tree Source: World Vision 2020 Child protection model
Figure 5: Objective tree
Figure 6: Example of a logical framework
Figure 7: Target Framework
Figure 8: Social Return of Investment illustration (source Miller and Hall, 2013)
Figure 9: Detailed Implementation plan sample Source: World Vision International
Figure 10: Logical Framework
Figure 11: The performance Monitoring Plan (PMP)
Figure 12: Example of IPTT for a MCHN Project
Figure 13: Source: (Almazan, 2012; Kusek and Rist, 2004; Meier, 2003; Spreckley and hunt, 2009).
Figure 14: Source: (Gamble, 2008).
Figure 15: Appreciative inquiry
Figure 16: Source: PEPFAR Capacity building and strengthening framework, 2012
Figure 17: Strategic planning cycle
Figure 18: Source: (PEPFAR Capacity building and strengthening framework, 2012).
Figure 19: Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
Figure 20: Analysis of Public Service Collective Agreements Implemented
Figure 21: New Partnership model
Figure 22: Source: (OECD, 2019).
Figure 23: Change Process
Figure 24: Change Management Triangle
Figure 25: Change Management Processes
Figure 26: Prosci 3 Phase Process
Figure 27: Change Management Flow chart
Acknowledgement
To God be the glory for the things He has done and for guiding us to complete the book. This book would not have been possible to publish without the necessary moral support from family members of the authors (Dr Phiri’s wife Maria, Mr Chimombo’s wife Evelyn and their children. Thanks to the book editing team for the splendid work and to Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council for the financial sponsorship that made it possible to publish the book. To all who contributed directly and indirectly to internal review, information-sharing, thank you.
Declaration
This book is a collection of our lived experiences in the Planning Monitoring and Evaluation space for the past 13 years and existing literature on M and E broadly. The book refers in every strategic process of the project management cycle our lived experiences as practitioners in the Planning Monitoring and Evaluation where we provided leadership and were hands-on. Where information was collected and used from different sources, as well as other authors, these sources, have been acknowledged through citation and referencing. Sources include academic literature, government strategic planning, monitoring and evaluation reports and documents from different institutions
Foreword
In the 21st century any project including Human life needs thorough planning, monitoring of the project and decision gates along the way. Outbreaks such as Covid 19 pandemic have demonstrated that we are not yet there where systems and processes are in place to plan, monitor and evaluate. This is often blinded by wanting quick wins at the expense of due diligence. Understanding the project management life cycle often helps the project owners to plan and implement their project (s) or programmes well. More often projects fail because stakeholders have no clear picture of the vision, mission, and goal of the pathway of change the project set to achieve. This has made scholars, academics, government, Philanthropy and development practitioners to embrace the discourse of results based management framework within the project life cycle which include at all stages the Monitoring and Evaluation processes. Many books have been written about Monitoring and Evaluation since its introduction by donor agencies to today. However, it is important to note that project management has been revolving and new dynamics are emerging which need to be identified and debated upon in government as well as other public and private platforms.
While the process of promoting Monitoring and Evaluation involves identifying respective tools, guidelines as well as empowerment of staff and communities, the whole process is not homogeneous and is not one size fits all. As institutions plan to be effective and efficient thus ‘doing things right’ and doing right things’ M and E is no longer an area of technical teams alone but for all involved in any programme or project, from senior leadership to middle management. This therefore need continuous up skilling and reskilling of staff as an empowerment process to ensure the organisation achieves its set objectives. However, as the book outlines in some of the chapters, it is not an easy road due to organisational politics and leadership style.
Understanding the ‘whole’ is so critical before any plans to empower the team thus from identifying the root cause of the existence of the organisation, its vision, mission, its strategy, the theory of change, business plan, operational plan and the monitoring and accountability systems as well as the evaluation process. Half-baked management systems and approaches of ‘them and us’ do not apply in the 21st century development agenda in both public and private sectors. The process of planning from design phase, development of theory of change, to strategy development, as well as business plans, medium term strategic frameworks as well as operational plans has been externally controlled and managed inside as some institutions prefer to hire consultants to do their Monitoring and Evaluation (M and E) work to fast track the process. Such management has dire consequences to the organisation. This has been evident in government departments, corporate sector and NGOs’ environment. This requires strong internal process to empower management from higher to lower level to embrace the M and E culture.
Holland and Ruedin (2012) has argued that empowerment is a process that cannot be externally controlled and managed. If empowerment programmes are managed, monitored and evaluated in ways that are top-down, technocratic and controlling, governments’, private sectors’ and donors’ actions can have unintended disempowering effects. While monitoring and evaluation tools are useful for learning and improving effectiveness, in the context of empowerment work they must be designed and used with care, so that the monitoring and evaluation process itself can be supportive of empowerment outcomes
If government, corporate, NGOs and donors use methods that are technocratic and controlling, they can have unintended disempowering effects. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) must be used with care in the context of empowerment. Government, corporate, and donors have to strike a balance between the flexibility required in supporting empowerment and social change and their need to demonstrate results and impact. Monitoring and assessing empowerment can encourage governments, private sectors and donors to recognise that they themselves exercise power and reflect on the impact this has on the empowerment process. Government, corporate, NGOs and other donors should also recognise the limits to their power within larger political structure. Participatory methods for monitoring and evaluation can be efficient, producing data for analysis and action to support empowerment if adopted and utilised fully.
There is tension for governments, private sector and donors between adopting a flexible and enabling role in supporting an empowerment process of social change and the obligation to demonstrate results and fulfil internal rules and regulations. This has been demonstrated in different countries during the Covid-19 pandemic and how the disaster was monitored and managed. Countries have been caught unaware by the pandemic and have been struggling to empower citizens, change behaviours, promote better health systems and reduce the numbers of ordinary citizens affected and combat Covid-19. Some countries have shown strong monitoring systems than others.
Understanding ‘what works, what does not and why’, is central to this evolving and deepening self-awareness of an organisation and to the process of changing governments or donor/partner relationships. Monitoring and assessing empowerment can encourage government or donors to recognise that they themselves exercise power in their relationship with local municipality, district municipality, provincial and national and to reflect on the impact that they have on empowerment processes of staff at different levels. It is important to outline that the book is based on our experiences in the strategic planning, Monitoring and Evaluation space working with government at National and local level as well as with NGO sector for more than 15 years. So the debates we put together and the guide giving to practitioners is strongly linked to the experiences we went through being hands on providing strategic leadership and training of staff and communities.
This book attempts to assist both private and public sectors to seriously reconsider putting enough resources towards the empowerment process on M and E as demonstrated by the Covid-19 pandemic that strong M and E systems are needed at every stage of a programme, project or a pandemic. Planning Monitoring and Evaluation continue to be a fundamental 2063 Africa agenda promoting accountability, effectiveness and efficiency in this uncertain future of development. Skilling, up skilling and reskilling in M and E should become business as usual in any organisation.
Professor Jonathan Makuwira Malawi University of Science and Technology
Acronmys
COGTA Corporate Governance Traditional Affairs
DAC Development Assistance Committee
DE Developmental Evaluation
DPLG Department of Provincial Local Government
DPME Department of Planning Monitoring and Evaluation
DPSA Department of Public Service and Administration
GIS Geographic Information system
GWM&ES Government-wide Monitoring and Evaluation System
IPTT Indicator Performance Tracking Table
IT Information Technology
LFA Logical Frame Work Analysis,
M and E Monitoring and Evaluation
MIS Management Information System
MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework
MOV Means of Verification
NDP National Development Plan
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
NSG National School of government
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
OVI Objectively Verifiable Indicators
PCM Project Cycle Management
PLA Participatory Learning and Action
PME Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
PMP Performance Monitoring Plan
PPEs Personal Protective Equipment
PPM Project Planning Matrix
PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal
RBM Results Based Management
RCCE Risk communication and community engagement
SAMEA South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association
SDGs Sustainable Development Goals
SROI Social Return on Investment
TLC Total Land Care
TOC Theory of change
WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene
WHO World Health Organisation
CHAPTER 1
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
"Whose fault was it that the targets were not met and no impact at all after 3 years of hard work? Was this the problem of senior management, technical team or implementers or the stakeholders?"
1.1 Introduction
Whose fault was it that the targets were not met and no impact at all after 3 years of hard work? Was this the problem of senior management, technical team or implementers or the stakeholders?
These are critical questions that we have encountered in the Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation space as practitioners which we need to answer authenticated by our experiences. The answer we found it in the organisation, how the organisation or department is positioned in terms of its Result Based Management.
The chapter outlines debates around the rise and importance of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) in development, corporate and government institutions. The debates encompasses both academic as well as our own first-hand experiences in the field leading international and national programmes. The process of promoting Monitoring and Evaluation involves identifying respective tools, and guidelines as well as empowerment of staff and communities. However, the whole process is not homogeneous and is not one-size fits all.
Staff empowerment in M and E as well as the M and E Culture are some parts that are often compromised and left to the technical team yet have a lot of effect on the failure or success of an organisation in achieving the set goals and objectives, long term and short term. The process of empowerment cannot be externally controlled and managed. If donors use methods that are technocratic and controlling they can have unintended disempowering effects. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) must be used with care in the context of empowerment as it is no longer an option but priority. Governments, private sector and donors have to strike a balance between the flexibility required in supporting empowerment and social change as well as the need to demonstrate results. Monitoring and assessing empowerment can encourage governments, donors to recognise that they themselves exercise power and reflect on the impact this have on the empowerment process. What we experienced is that, governments, private sector and donors should also recognise the limits to their power within the larger political structure. Participatory methods for monitoring and evaluation can be efficient, producing data for analysis and action to support empowerment.
Holland and Ruedin (2012) argued that empowerment is a process that cannot be externally controlled and managed. If empowerment programmes are managed, monitored and evaluated in ways that are top-down, technocratic and controlling, governments’, private sectors’ and donors’ actions can have unintended disempowering effects. While Monitoring and Evaluation tools are useful for learning and improving effectiveness, in the context of empowerment work they must be designed and used with care, so that the monitoring and evaluation process itself can be supportive of empowerment outcomes. There is tension for governments, private sector and donors to adopt flexible and enabling role in supporting an empowerment process of social change and the obligation to demonstrate results and fulfil internal rules and regulations.
What we learnt in the governance space was that doing things right and doing right things remain a challenge. Understanding what works, what does not work and why is central to this evolving and deepening self-awareness and to the process of changing donor/partner relationships. Monitoring and assessing empowerment can encourage governments, private sector and donors to recognise that they themselves exercise power in their relationship with partners at different levels and to reflect on the impact that they have had on empowerment processes.
Local government, Provincial and National governments, private sector and donors should recognise the limits to their power within bigger political structures and processes. Participatory methods can be quick and efficient, producing data in a timely fashion for evidence-based analysis and action in ways that support empowerment. Many government and Public sector staff lack M and E skills from senior leadership to middle management and junior level.
Governments, private sector, donors and local stakeholders increasingly recognise the importance of monitoring and evaluating development policies and programmes. Monitoring and Evaluation has become so important in any development space contributing to insights about what does and does not work and why. Furthermore, it enables programme changes that will make donors and partners more effective at