Open In App

K’th Smallest/Largest Element in Unsorted Array | Worst case Linear Time

Last Updated : 04 Mar, 2025
Summarize
Comments
Improve
Suggest changes
Like Article
Like
Share
Report
News Follow

Given an array and a number k where k is smaller than the size of the array, we need to find the k’th smallest element in the given array. It is given that all array elements are distinct.
Examples: 

Input: arr[] = {7, 10, 4, 3, 20, 15}
k = 3
Output: 7

Input: arr[] = {7, 10, 4, 3, 20, 15}
k = 4
Output: 10

In the previous post, we discussed an expected linear time algorithm. In this post, a worst-case linear time method is discussed. The idea in this new method is similar to quickSelect(). We get worst-case linear time by selecting a pivot that divides the array in a balanced way (there are not very few elements on one side and many on another side). After the array is divided in a balanced way, we apply the same steps as used in quickSelect() to decide whether to go left or right of the pivot.
Following is the complete algorithm.

kthSmallest(arr[0..n-1], k) 
1) Divide arr[] into ceill(n/5) groups where size of each group is 5 except possibly the last group which may have less than 5 elements. 
2) Sort the above created ceil(n/5) groups and find median of all groups. Create an auxiliary array ‘median[]’ and store medians of all ceil(n/5) groups in this median array.
// Recursively call this method to find median of median[0..ceil(n/5)-1] 
3) medOfMed = kthSmallest(median[0..ceil(n/5)-1], ceil(n/10))
4) Partition arr[] around medOfMed and obtain its position. 
pos = partition(arr, n, medOfMed)
5) If pos == k return medOfMed 
6) If pos > k return kthSmallest(arr[l..pos-1], k) 
7) If pos < k return kthSmallest(arr[pos+1..r], k-pos+l-1)

In the above algorithm, the last 3 steps are the same as the algorithm in the previous post. The first four steps are used to obtain a good point for partitioning the array (to ensure there are not too many elements on either side of the pivot).
Following is the implementation of the above algorithm. 
 

C++
// C++ implementation of worst case linear time algorithm
// to find k'th smallest element
#include<bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

int partition(int arr[], int l, int r, int k);

// A simple function to find median of arr[].  This is called
// only for an array of size 5 in this program.
int findMedian(int arr[], int n)
{
    sort(arr, arr+n);  // Sort the array
    return arr[n/2];   // Return middle element
}

// Returns k'th smallest element in arr[l..r] in worst case
// linear time. ASSUMPTION: ALL ELEMENTS IN ARR[] ARE DISTINCT
int kthSmallest(int arr[], int l, int r, int k)
{
    // If k is smaller than number of elements in array
    if (k > 0 && k <= r - l + 1)
    {
        int n = r-l+1; // Number of elements in arr[l..r]

        // Divide arr[] in groups of size 5, calculate median
        // of every group and store it in median[] array.
        int i, median[(n+4)/5]; // There will be floor((n+4)/5) groups;
        for (i=0; i<n/5; i++)
            median[i] = findMedian(arr+l+i*5, 5);
        if (i*5 < n) //For last group with less than 5 elements
        {
            median[i] = findMedian(arr+l+i*5, n%5); 
            i++;
        }    

        // Find median of all medians using recursive call.
        // If median[] has only one element, then no need
        // of recursive call
        int medOfMed = (i == 1)? median[i-1]:
                                 kthSmallest(median, 0, i-1, i/2);

        // Partition the array around a random element and
        // get position of pivot element in sorted array
        int pos = partition(arr, l, r, medOfMed);

        // If position is same as k
        if (pos-l == k-1)
            return arr[pos];
        if (pos-l > k-1)  // If position is more, recur for left
            return kthSmallest(arr, l, pos-1, k);

        // Else recur for right subarray
        return kthSmallest(arr, pos+1, r, k-pos+l-1);
    }

    // If k is more than number of elements in array
    return INT_MAX;
}

// It searches for x in arr[l..r], and partitions the array 
// around x.
int partition(int arr[], int l, int r, int x)
{
    // Search for x in arr[l..r] and move it to end
    int i;
    for (i=l; i<r; i++)
        if (arr[i] == x)
           break;
    swap(arr[i], arr[r]);

    // Standard partition algorithm
    i = l;
    for (int j = l; j <= r - 1; j++)
    {
        if (arr[j] <= x)
        {
            swap(arr[i], arr[j]);
            i++;
        }
    }
    swap(arr[i], arr[r]);
    return i;
}

// Driver program to test above methods
int main()
{
    int arr[] = {12, 3, 5, 7, 4, 19, 26};
    int n = sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]), k = 3;
    cout << "K'th smallest element is "
         << kthSmallest(arr, 0, n-1, k);
    return 0;
}
Java Python C# JavaScript

Output
K'th smallest element is 5

The code implements the “Worst-case linear time algorithm to find the k-th smallest element” using the Decrease and Conquer strategy. The steps of the algorithm are as follows:

If the value of k is greater than the number of elements in the array or k is less than 1, return INT_MAX (which is a constant representing the maximum value of an integer in C++).

Divide the array into groups of five elements each (except possibly the last group, which may have less than five elements). Sort each group and find its median. Store all the medians in an array called ‘median’.

Find the median of the ‘median’ array by recursively calling the kthSmallest() function. If the ‘median’ array has only one element, then it is the median of all medians.

Partition the original array around the median of medians and find the position ‘pos’ of the pivot element in the sorted array.

If pos-l is equal to k-1 (i.e., the pivot element is the k-th smallest element), return the pivot element.

If pos-l is greater than k-1, then recursively call the kthSmallest() function on the left sub-array (i.e., arr[l…pos-1]).

If pos-l is less than k-1, then recursively call the kthSmallest() function on the right sub-array (i.e., arr[pos+1…r]) with updated k value (k-(pos-l+1)).
Time Complexity: 
The worst-case time complexity of the above algorithm is O(n). Let us analyze all steps. 
Steps (1) and (2) take O(n) time as finding median of an array of size 5 takes O(1) time and there are n/5 arrays of size 5. 
Step (3) takes T(n/5) time. Step (4) is a standard partition and takes O(n) time. 
The interesting steps are 6) and 7). At most, one of them is executed. These are recursive steps. What is the worst-case size of these recursive calls? The answer is the maximum number of elements greater than medOfMed (obtained in step 3) or the maximum number of elements smaller than medOfMed. 
How many elements are greater than medOfMed and how many are smaller? 
At least half of the medians found in step 2 are greater than or equal to medOfMed. Thus, at least half of the n/5 groups contribute 3 elements that are greater than medOfMed, except for the one group that has fewer than 5 elements. Therefore, the number of elements greater than medOfMed is at least. 
3(12n52)3n106         3\left (\left \lceil \frac{1}{2}\left \lceil \frac{n}{5} \right \rceil \right \rceil-2 \right )\geq \frac{3n}{10}-6         
Similarly, the number of elements which are less than medOfMed is at least 3n/10 – 6. In the worst case, the function recurs for at most n – (3n/10 – 6) which is 7n/10 + 6 elements.
Note that 7n/10 + 6 < 20 and that any input of 80 or fewer elements requires O(1) time. We can therefore obtain the recurrence 
T(n){Θ(1) if n80T(n5)+T(7n10+6)+O(n) if n>90         T(n)\leq \begin{cases} \Theta (1) & \text{ if } n\leq 80 \\ T(\left \lceil \frac{n}{5} \right \rceil)+T(\frac{7n}{10}+6)+O(n) & \text{ if } n> 90 \end{cases}         
We show that the running time is linear by substitution. Assume that T(n) cn for some constant c and all n > 80. Substituting this inductive hypothesis into the right-hand side of the recurrence yields 

T(n)  <= cn/5 + c(7n/10 + 6) + O(n)
<= cn/5 + c + 7cn/10 + 6c + O(n)
<= 9cn/10 + 7c + O(n)
<= cn,


since we can pick c large enough so that c(n/10 – 7) is larger than the function described by the O(n) term for all n > 80. The worst-case running time of is therefore linear
Note that the above algorithm is linear in the worst case, but the constants are very high for this algorithm. Therefore, this algorithm doesn’t work well in practical situations; randomized quickSelect works much better and is preferred.
 



Next Article

Similar Reads

three90RightbarBannerImg