What do you think?
Rate this book
Arthurian Saga #3
The Last Enchantment
Arthur Pendragon is King! Unchallenged on the battlefield, he melds the country together in a time of promise. But sinister powers plot to destroy Camelot, and when the witch-queen Morgause -- Arthur's own half sister -- ensnares him in an incestuous liaison, a fatal web of love, betrayal, and bloody vengeance is woven.
544 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1979
About the author
Mary Stewart
100 books2,661 followersLibrarian Note: There is more than one author in the Goodreads database with this name.
Lady Mary Stewart, born Mary Florence Elinor Rainbow, was a popular English novelist, and taught at the school of John Norquay elementary for 30 to 35 years.
She was one of the most widely read fiction writers of our time. The author of twenty novels, a volume of poetry, and three books for young readers, she was admired for both her contemporary stories of romantic suspense and her historical novels. Born in England, she lived for many years in Scotland, spending time between Edinburgh and the West Highlands.
Her unofficial fan site can be found at http://marystewartnovels.blogspot.com/.
Lady Mary Stewart, born Mary Florence Elinor Rainbow, was a popular English novelist, and taught at the school of John Norquay elementary for 30 to 35 years.
She was one of the most widely read fiction writers of our time. The author of twenty novels, a volume of poetry, and three books for young readers, she was admired for both her contemporary stories of romantic suspense and her historical novels. Born in England, she lived for many years in Scotland, spending time between Edinburgh and the West Highlands.
Her unofficial fan site can be found at http://marystewartnovels.blogspot.com/.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 584 reviews
May 14, 2016
"Here, away from lights and sounds of town or village, the night was deep, the black sky stretching, fathomless, away between the spheres, to some unimaginable world where gods walked, and suns and moons showered down like petals falling. Some power there is that draws men's eyes and hearts up and outwards, beyond the heavy clay that fastens them to earth. Music can take them, and the moon's light, and, I suppose, love, though I had not known it then, except in worship."
There has been nothing more comforting to me than to sit curled up with Mary Stewart's Arthurian series these past several weeks. This holds true for this divine last installment of the trilogy as well. Reading this felt as if I was having my own little heart-to-heart by the fireside with Merlin himself. Merlin, as he is so deftly drawn by Ms. Stewart, has quickly become one of my favorite literary characters. Not a crazed wizard lurking in the shadows with his potions and wacky prophecies, Merlin is instead a very compassionate, charismatic, intelligent, worldly and very mortal human being. His love and devotion to King Arthur is steadfast and akin to that of a father for his son; this feeling is justly returned by Arthur. In The Last Enchantment, Merlin must come to terms with a shift in his power and have faith in the will of his gods. Loss speaks to him in a manner that parallels what he understands to be the retreat of those gods. Yet, there is a purpose and meaning to all things, and Merlin never fails to point this out to me as a reader, not by preaching but simply by showing.
Now, veering away from my sentiments regarding Merlin, I must point out that this book has plenty of intrigue for those that prefer a dose of drama and adventure as well. A deliciously wicked villainess in the form of Arthur's half-sister, Morgause, seeks her revenge on Merlin and demonstrates her own knowledge of not just the black arts but the wiles of a seductive woman. Merlin must reach beyond his limited experience with those of the feminine sex to battle such deviltry. "It is easier to call the storm from the empty sky, than to manipulate the heart of a man; and soon, if my bones did not lie to me, I should be needing all the power I could muster, to pit against a woman; and this is harder to do than anything concerning men, as air is harder to see than a mountain." We are also introduced to the beautiful Queen Guinevere who is worshipped not just by her King but by all her subjects within the kingdom. We see the building of the famed Camelot, deception, kidnapping, forbidden love, and true, unadulterated love.
It's difficult to express the joy I feel when reading what has become a treasured book series. I am actually not one to read a series – I have so many books on my list that I don't always get around to reading those that might follow a book that I enjoyed. But this Arthurian series has been an exception rather than a rule. They are so beautifully written that I can't help but savor each one and let myself disappear in this world for a short while. This is a true escape which I highly recommend if you ever feel bogged down by reality and sameness.
"Magic is the door through which mortal man may sometimes step, to find the gates in the hollow hills, and let himself through into the halls of that other world."
There has been nothing more comforting to me than to sit curled up with Mary Stewart's Arthurian series these past several weeks. This holds true for this divine last installment of the trilogy as well. Reading this felt as if I was having my own little heart-to-heart by the fireside with Merlin himself. Merlin, as he is so deftly drawn by Ms. Stewart, has quickly become one of my favorite literary characters. Not a crazed wizard lurking in the shadows with his potions and wacky prophecies, Merlin is instead a very compassionate, charismatic, intelligent, worldly and very mortal human being. His love and devotion to King Arthur is steadfast and akin to that of a father for his son; this feeling is justly returned by Arthur. In The Last Enchantment, Merlin must come to terms with a shift in his power and have faith in the will of his gods. Loss speaks to him in a manner that parallels what he understands to be the retreat of those gods. Yet, there is a purpose and meaning to all things, and Merlin never fails to point this out to me as a reader, not by preaching but simply by showing.
Now, veering away from my sentiments regarding Merlin, I must point out that this book has plenty of intrigue for those that prefer a dose of drama and adventure as well. A deliciously wicked villainess in the form of Arthur's half-sister, Morgause, seeks her revenge on Merlin and demonstrates her own knowledge of not just the black arts but the wiles of a seductive woman. Merlin must reach beyond his limited experience with those of the feminine sex to battle such deviltry. "It is easier to call the storm from the empty sky, than to manipulate the heart of a man; and soon, if my bones did not lie to me, I should be needing all the power I could muster, to pit against a woman; and this is harder to do than anything concerning men, as air is harder to see than a mountain." We are also introduced to the beautiful Queen Guinevere who is worshipped not just by her King but by all her subjects within the kingdom. We see the building of the famed Camelot, deception, kidnapping, forbidden love, and true, unadulterated love.
It's difficult to express the joy I feel when reading what has become a treasured book series. I am actually not one to read a series – I have so many books on my list that I don't always get around to reading those that might follow a book that I enjoyed. But this Arthurian series has been an exception rather than a rule. They are so beautifully written that I can't help but savor each one and let myself disappear in this world for a short while. This is a true escape which I highly recommend if you ever feel bogged down by reality and sameness.
"Magic is the door through which mortal man may sometimes step, to find the gates in the hollow hills, and let himself through into the halls of that other world."
January 5, 2024
I have put down this book once more with a sigh and a feeling that I have been in the presence of greatness. I have been there with Merlin, with Arthur, with Ambrosius; and I am reluctant, as always, to have it come to an end.
It was almost night, but over beyond Maridunum in the west, a lingering bar of light hinted at the dying sun. It threw a glint on the river skirting the palace wall where I was born, and touched a jewel spark on the distant sea. Near at hand the trees were bare with winter, and the ground crisp with the first frost. Arthur trod away from me across the grass, leaving ghost-prints in the frost. He reached the place where the track led down to the grove, and half turned. I saw him raise a hand. 4/13/20
-----------------
The Last Enchantment is Mary Stewart’s third installment in her Arthurian novels, and the last of the trilogy that centers around the character of Merlin. In her inimitable way, Stewart gives us the final days of Merlin and brings us full circle to the beginning of The Crystal Cave, in which we are introduced to an old man setting out to tell his tale of wonder in service to his god.
Arthur, now King of all Britain, must deal with all the obstacles to his reign that have become so much a part of the legend of his life. Evil, in the person of Morgause, his sister and the mother of his only child, rears its head and bites into the fabric of his glory, and Merlin must help him to steer a course through the dangers she presents. Guinevere comes into his life and with her the seeds of a love for his best friend that is forbidden but impossible to ignore. Merlin experiences love and possible betrayal, and the hardest of all things, the waning of his power.
The strength of this series for me has always been the perception of Merlin as a man and not a wizard, a tool of the gods but never a god himself. Stewart carries that theme right to the end in a way that makes you ache for Merlin and share his accomplishments and sorrows in a way that would be impossible if he were all-knowing or in control. The love he inspires in and feels for Arthur is palpable and his failure to understand women and their needs is evident as he deals with the female characters who become so important in his final days.
I said to the ghosts, to the voices, to the empty moonlight: ‘It was time. Let me go in peace.’ Then, commending myself and my spirit to God who all these years had held me in his hand, I composed myself for sleep. This was the last thing that I know to be truth, and not a dream in darkness.
This is not the end of Merlin’s tale, but which of us would not be satisfied to be able to lay our lives down with so little fear and such faith?
I love this series so much and feel so much still when reading them, that I always feel the desire to be able to convey that feeling in some way and inspire others to pick them up and read. There is much of fantasy, history, and legend here, but there is more. There is love, betrayal, purpose, faith and the idea that a life that is lived for something other than self-service is a life worth living and full of reward. There is a sense that if you set yourself in the path of the gods they will guide you toward your true destiny, but that no man can ever go there by himself and without their help. There is the assurance that the encounters we have in life are worth having, even if in the end we must kiss them and let them go. And, perhaps that even in the lives that are touched with great doings and important events, it is the simple things, like the love of a man for his son, that are truly important.
I lifted my head, remembering, once more, the child who had listened nightly for the music of the spheres, but had never heard it. Now here it was, all around me, a sweet, disembodied music, as if the hill itself was a harp to the high air.
The music is there, all around us, and if we listen long enough we will hear it and it will be enough to satisfy us at last.
It was almost night, but over beyond Maridunum in the west, a lingering bar of light hinted at the dying sun. It threw a glint on the river skirting the palace wall where I was born, and touched a jewel spark on the distant sea. Near at hand the trees were bare with winter, and the ground crisp with the first frost. Arthur trod away from me across the grass, leaving ghost-prints in the frost. He reached the place where the track led down to the grove, and half turned. I saw him raise a hand. 4/13/20
-----------------
The Last Enchantment is Mary Stewart’s third installment in her Arthurian novels, and the last of the trilogy that centers around the character of Merlin. In her inimitable way, Stewart gives us the final days of Merlin and brings us full circle to the beginning of The Crystal Cave, in which we are introduced to an old man setting out to tell his tale of wonder in service to his god.
Arthur, now King of all Britain, must deal with all the obstacles to his reign that have become so much a part of the legend of his life. Evil, in the person of Morgause, his sister and the mother of his only child, rears its head and bites into the fabric of his glory, and Merlin must help him to steer a course through the dangers she presents. Guinevere comes into his life and with her the seeds of a love for his best friend that is forbidden but impossible to ignore. Merlin experiences love and possible betrayal, and the hardest of all things, the waning of his power.
The strength of this series for me has always been the perception of Merlin as a man and not a wizard, a tool of the gods but never a god himself. Stewart carries that theme right to the end in a way that makes you ache for Merlin and share his accomplishments and sorrows in a way that would be impossible if he were all-knowing or in control. The love he inspires in and feels for Arthur is palpable and his failure to understand women and their needs is evident as he deals with the female characters who become so important in his final days.
I said to the ghosts, to the voices, to the empty moonlight: ‘It was time. Let me go in peace.’ Then, commending myself and my spirit to God who all these years had held me in his hand, I composed myself for sleep. This was the last thing that I know to be truth, and not a dream in darkness.
This is not the end of Merlin’s tale, but which of us would not be satisfied to be able to lay our lives down with so little fear and such faith?
I love this series so much and feel so much still when reading them, that I always feel the desire to be able to convey that feeling in some way and inspire others to pick them up and read. There is much of fantasy, history, and legend here, but there is more. There is love, betrayal, purpose, faith and the idea that a life that is lived for something other than self-service is a life worth living and full of reward. There is a sense that if you set yourself in the path of the gods they will guide you toward your true destiny, but that no man can ever go there by himself and without their help. There is the assurance that the encounters we have in life are worth having, even if in the end we must kiss them and let them go. And, perhaps that even in the lives that are touched with great doings and important events, it is the simple things, like the love of a man for his son, that are truly important.
I lifted my head, remembering, once more, the child who had listened nightly for the music of the spheres, but had never heard it. Now here it was, all around me, a sweet, disembodied music, as if the hill itself was a harp to the high air.
The music is there, all around us, and if we listen long enough we will hear it and it will be enough to satisfy us at last.
July 26, 2018
It is a shame to rate this instalment the same as The Hollow Hills (as I found that book leaden in parts) & less than The Crystal Cave, but I do have good reasons. Bear with me.
I found the first two parts of this novel absolutely enthralling, with Mrs Stewart's trademark lyrical language & description of place. But in Part 3, along with the waning of Merlin's powers, came the waning of the story. I know this was the story of Merlin the Enchanter. But my late parents were musical lovers & I grew up listening to;
This was the part of the legend I had been eagerly awaiting, but Mrs Stewart sheds no light on Guinevere's apparent lack of interest in the most powerful man of his age - who was young, handsome & in this telling, treated her with unfailing courtesy. So Arthur & Guinevere came across like this;
If possible, they were even more plastic. I really struggled to get through this & the start of Part Four.
Merlin & Nimuë's relationship. (not a spoiler, these are well known legends) I just couldn't help a shiver of revulsion. This would be because I was picturing Merlin like this;
I'm doing this as a buddy read & one of the other participants, Karlyne, puts Merlin's age at around 40. Maths isn't my strong suit but I was thinking 50. So...
Better?
When Merlin was & I'm glad Nimuë wasn't portrayed as a total villainess, because the legend was starting to feel misogynistic. That did leave some of her motivation as quite baffling but that was better than having all the female characters cook, clean or betray.
So all in all a most excellent read & I'm looking forward to The Wicked Day. I also had a lot of pleasure reading different Wikipedia entries & I recommend you do the same.
I found the first two parts of this novel absolutely enthralling, with Mrs Stewart's trademark lyrical language & description of place. But in Part 3, along with the waning of Merlin's powers, came the waning of the story. I know this was the story of Merlin the Enchanter. But my late parents were musical lovers & I grew up listening to;
This was the part of the legend I had been eagerly awaiting, but Mrs Stewart sheds no light on Guinevere's apparent lack of interest in the most powerful man of his age - who was young, handsome & in this telling, treated her with unfailing courtesy. So Arthur & Guinevere came across like this;
If possible, they were even more plastic. I really struggled to get through this & the start of Part Four.
Merlin & Nimuë's relationship. (not a spoiler, these are well known legends) I just couldn't help a shiver of revulsion. This would be because I was picturing Merlin like this;
I'm doing this as a buddy read & one of the other participants, Karlyne, puts Merlin's age at around 40. Maths isn't my strong suit but I was thinking 50. So...
Better?
When Merlin was & I'm glad Nimuë wasn't portrayed as a total villainess, because the legend was starting to feel misogynistic. That did leave some of her motivation as quite baffling but that was better than having all the female characters cook, clean or betray.
So all in all a most excellent read & I'm looking forward to The Wicked Day. I also had a lot of pleasure reading different Wikipedia entries & I recommend you do the same.
January 15, 2019
The third in Mary Stewart's extremely enchanting and brilliant Merlin trilogy, this book is like it's predecessors extremely engaging, magical, thrilling, absorbing and holds you interest. The passion, intrigue, romance, emotion, and the panoramic sweep of events holds your attention throughout
It begins at the beginning of Arthur's reign in Dumpeldyr in Scotland, where King Lot and Arthur's wicked half-sister Morgause reign and sexual encounter with Morgause.... Following the narrative through the eyes of Merlin the enchanter,Merlin's role as Arthur's right hand man and spy at large. It covers the events of the building up of Arthur's kingdom,the struggle against the invading Saxon hordes and Merlin's efforts to contain the ambitious lords who covet the throne. Central to the novel are the wicked plots of Arthur's half-sister , and most now contend with her bastard son Mordred, who the great clairvoyant Merlin has foreseen will be the death of Arthur.
Finally the book takes us to Merlin's retreat at Applegarth and Bryn Myrddin where he apprentices a beautiful and intelligent young girl Niniane (Nimue) and finds love with her in his old age. Nimue is to be trained in Merlin's powers before Merlin retires the Crystal Cave and lives the happy life of a hermit.
The total effect creates a compelling and spellbinding epic which serves as an imposing example of the author's enthusiasm for her subject as well as an intriguing look into 5th century Britain through the author's skill.
It begins at the beginning of Arthur's reign in Dumpeldyr in Scotland, where King Lot and Arthur's wicked half-sister Morgause reign and sexual encounter with Morgause.... Following the narrative through the eyes of Merlin the enchanter,Merlin's role as Arthur's right hand man and spy at large. It covers the events of the building up of Arthur's kingdom,the struggle against the invading Saxon hordes and Merlin's efforts to contain the ambitious lords who covet the throne. Central to the novel are the wicked plots of Arthur's half-sister , and most now contend with her bastard son Mordred, who the great clairvoyant Merlin has foreseen will be the death of Arthur.
Finally the book takes us to Merlin's retreat at Applegarth and Bryn Myrddin where he apprentices a beautiful and intelligent young girl Niniane (Nimue) and finds love with her in his old age. Nimue is to be trained in Merlin's powers before Merlin retires the Crystal Cave and lives the happy life of a hermit.
The total effect creates a compelling and spellbinding epic which serves as an imposing example of the author's enthusiasm for her subject as well as an intriguing look into 5th century Britain through the author's skill.
December 3, 2022
Magic is the door through which mortal man may sometimes step, to find the gates in the hollow hills, and let himself through into the halls of the other world.
I have just spent the past 2 weeks enchanted by going back in time to when Arthur Pendragon was High King of Britain and Merlin served him as his friend, enchanter and prophet. Starting with The Hollow Hills and then piggy-backing with the third installment of The Last Enchantment, I was truly in awe and fascinated with how Mary Stewart drew the legends that so many of us are familiar with. It was a splendid book in which to savor while wrapped up in a blanket with a cup of tea by my side.
Unless you’ve been living under a rock or off the grid, you must know some of the legends of King Arthur’s court, Camelot, the Knights of the Round Table, the Lady of the Lake and of course, Merlin the magician. Stewart takes such care to ensure that her version of this glorious and timeless tale is handled with the utmost scrutiny and regard. She gives it her own touch of magic by whisking her readers away to a favorite place and time. Through her storytelling we are privileged to immerse ourselves in a story about a myth, a legend, and a struggle with good and evil.
Merlin narrates the story once again showing us how King Arthur continuously remained victorious in his battles against the Saxons. We are introduced to his Queen Guinevere but when peace comes to the kingdom, there is treachery brewing in the form of his two sisters, Morgan and Morgause. This is more of Merlin’s story, however, as he must come to grips with aging and the changes that are taking place with his diminishing power. He experiences his own battle which is much different than Arthur’s in that Morgause, Arthur’s half-sister, proves a contentious opponent to him. Merlin’s limited experience and knowledge of women may prove to be a snare to him but he is able to finally experience love and the passing on of his knowledge to one he views as worthy.
I have to again thank my wonderful friend Sara for leading me to discovering this brilliant series. I would never have found them otherwise. I hope you will read her review as she so eloquently describes exactly how this book and series is so affecting so much better than I can. Sara’s review Please, if you have any interest at all in these legendary characters, do find a copy of these books and dive in while finding a comfy spot in your favorite chair.
Not as others had wanted to learn, for power or excitement, or for the prosecution of some enmity or private greed; but because he had seen, darkly with a child's eyes, how the gods move with the winds and speak with the sea and sleep in the gentle herbs; and how God himself is in the sum of all that is on the face of the lovely earth.
I have just spent the past 2 weeks enchanted by going back in time to when Arthur Pendragon was High King of Britain and Merlin served him as his friend, enchanter and prophet. Starting with The Hollow Hills and then piggy-backing with the third installment of The Last Enchantment, I was truly in awe and fascinated with how Mary Stewart drew the legends that so many of us are familiar with. It was a splendid book in which to savor while wrapped up in a blanket with a cup of tea by my side.
Unless you’ve been living under a rock or off the grid, you must know some of the legends of King Arthur’s court, Camelot, the Knights of the Round Table, the Lady of the Lake and of course, Merlin the magician. Stewart takes such care to ensure that her version of this glorious and timeless tale is handled with the utmost scrutiny and regard. She gives it her own touch of magic by whisking her readers away to a favorite place and time. Through her storytelling we are privileged to immerse ourselves in a story about a myth, a legend, and a struggle with good and evil.
Merlin narrates the story once again showing us how King Arthur continuously remained victorious in his battles against the Saxons. We are introduced to his Queen Guinevere but when peace comes to the kingdom, there is treachery brewing in the form of his two sisters, Morgan and Morgause. This is more of Merlin’s story, however, as he must come to grips with aging and the changes that are taking place with his diminishing power. He experiences his own battle which is much different than Arthur’s in that Morgause, Arthur’s half-sister, proves a contentious opponent to him. Merlin’s limited experience and knowledge of women may prove to be a snare to him but he is able to finally experience love and the passing on of his knowledge to one he views as worthy.
I have to again thank my wonderful friend Sara for leading me to discovering this brilliant series. I would never have found them otherwise. I hope you will read her review as she so eloquently describes exactly how this book and series is so affecting so much better than I can. Sara’s review Please, if you have any interest at all in these legendary characters, do find a copy of these books and dive in while finding a comfy spot in your favorite chair.
Not as others had wanted to learn, for power or excitement, or for the prosecution of some enmity or private greed; but because he had seen, darkly with a child's eyes, how the gods move with the winds and speak with the sea and sleep in the gentle herbs; and how God himself is in the sum of all that is on the face of the lovely earth.
June 21, 2021
The third in Mary Stewart's extremely enchanting and brilliant Merlin trilogy, this book is like it's predecessors extremely engaging, magical, thrilling, absorbing and holds you interest. The passion, intrigue, romance, emotion, and the panoramic sweep of events holds your attention throughout
It begins at the beginning of Arthur's reign in Dumpeldyr in Scotland, where King Lot and Arthur's wicked half-sister Morgause reign and sexual encounter with Morgause.... Following the narrative through the eyes of Merlin the enchanter,Merlin's role as Arthur's right hand man and spy at large. It covers the events of the building up of Arthur's kingdom,the struggle against the invading Saxon hordes and Merlin's efforts to contain the ambitious lords who covet the throne. Central to the novel are the wicked plots of Arthur's half-sister , and most now contend with her bastard son Mordred, who the great clairvoyant Merlin has foreseen will be the death of Arthur.
Finally the book takes us to Merlin's retreat at Applegarth and Bryn Myrddin where he apprentices a beautiful and intelligent young girl Niniane (Nimue) and finds love with her in his old age. Nimue is to be trained in Merlin's powers before Merlin retires the Crystal Cave and lives the happy life of a hermit.
The total effect creates a compelling and spellbinding epic which serves as an imposing example of the author's enthusiasm for her subject as well as an intriguing look into 5th century Britain through the author's skill
It begins at the beginning of Arthur's reign in Dumpeldyr in Scotland, where King Lot and Arthur's wicked half-sister Morgause reign and sexual encounter with Morgause.... Following the narrative through the eyes of Merlin the enchanter,Merlin's role as Arthur's right hand man and spy at large. It covers the events of the building up of Arthur's kingdom,the struggle against the invading Saxon hordes and Merlin's efforts to contain the ambitious lords who covet the throne. Central to the novel are the wicked plots of Arthur's half-sister , and most now contend with her bastard son Mordred, who the great clairvoyant Merlin has foreseen will be the death of Arthur.
Finally the book takes us to Merlin's retreat at Applegarth and Bryn Myrddin where he apprentices a beautiful and intelligent young girl Niniane (Nimue) and finds love with her in his old age. Nimue is to be trained in Merlin's powers before Merlin retires the Crystal Cave and lives the happy life of a hermit.
The total effect creates a compelling and spellbinding epic which serves as an imposing example of the author's enthusiasm for her subject as well as an intriguing look into 5th century Britain through the author's skill
August 23, 2024
A bitter-sweet ending, for a man who had a bitter-sweet life.
March 22, 2017
El escenario es Francia, entre los años 1588 y 1632, centrándose los acontecimientos a comienzos del siglo XVII, durante el reinado de Luis XIII, período de tiempo de transición política, religiosa y cultural del pueblo francés. El fondo de la historia está compuesto por los hechos que progresivamente convertirán a Francia en el país más fuerte de Europa durante ese siglo, debido a la concentración del poder absoluto en el Rey, lo cual fue gestado por el Cardenal-Duque de Richelieu, primer ministro de Francia.
El cardenal utiliza diversos medios para lograr sus objetivos, y entre ellos está la utilización de espías y mensajeros con enlaces en el extranjero. Debido a esto, reclutó a una hábil y bella mujer que se ganó su confianza, de la cual no sospechaba su verdadera identidad. Lo que terminó provocando la fuga de delicados documentos que podrían poner en riesgo la seguridad del reino, y quizá la suya propia. Para resarcirse de este error, el cardenal envía a su mejor hombre, León Bouthillier, con drásticas instrucciones para su captura.
"Es un conspirador, un espía y un traidor sin escrúpulos, capaz de matar a cualquiera que se interponga en su camino. Habla varios idiomas con fluidez, puede cambiar de identidad rápidamente, y se mueve con la misma facilidad en Francia, en Inglaterra y en los territorios del imperio". Pág. 14.
León inicia un camino que lo dirigirá a un curioso destino elegido por el propio Richelieu. Acompañado por extraños personajes, seguirá la huella de esta misteriosa mujer, de la cual, durante el transcurso de la persecución, irá conociendo su pasado. Los detalles de su vida y sus orígenes familiares, se remontan hacia finales del siglo XVI, en los tiempos del Rey Enrique IV.
Aun antes de nacer, su destino ya había sido trazado como desafortunado. Fue apartada de la estirpe familiar desde muy pequeña y rechazada por sus más cercanos cuando más lo necesitaba. Su carácter independiente y una curiosidad insaciable, la llevó a formar una personalidad que combinaba un gran intelecto con una fuerza interior capaz resistir cualquier adversidad.
"Vuestra hija es una salvaje. ¡Una vergüenza para la familia! No puedo hacer nada por ella, salvo rezar". Pág. 157.
Ella acepta las consecuencias de sus propias acciones, pero no está dispuesta a pagar por falsas acusaciones, ni menos por traiciones. Lo que la lleva a huir para sobrevivir y tramar su propia venganza, llevando consigo la marca maldita del lirio. Es un largo camino el que recorre a través de los barrios más humildes y miserables de Francia e Inglaterra, pero con ingenio y sacrificio, logra incluso ser aceptada en ambas cortes, donde utilizará toda su astucia y conocimientos para satisfacer todos sus anhelos.
"..., la expiación y la renuncia al mundo no era un precio demasiado alto por seguir viviendo". Pág. 222.
Esta novela se basa en los mismos hechos que hicieron famoso a Alexandre Dumas con "Los tres mosqueteros". Pero está narrado de una manera completamente diferente, más adulta, madura y mucho más profunda. Y desde luego, desde un punto de vista completamente diferente. El resultado es que, los que conocemos y adoramos "Los tres mosqueteros", también amaremos este libro, y los que no han leído a Dumas, lo amarán aún más.
Lo primero que sorprende, es el juego narrativo que nos propone desde el inicio. Adoro cuando los autores se ponen creativos: empezamos por el epílogo. Sí, por el epílogo, una idea fantástica para no presentar la historia de forma lineal, vale decir, empezamos por el final. Pero sería ilógico contar el fin antes que el resto de la historia, por eso la autora nos va presentando el epílogo por partes, a través de intermedios. Al inicio nos cuenta lo justo y necesario para ponernos en alerta y obligarnos a seguir indagando en la novela, y luego aparecen los capítulos de la historia que nos remontan al pasado, cuya fecha de inicio es 1588, entre un capítulo y otro hay un corto intermedio fechado siempre en 1632, se van alternando en la historia, hasta que el pasado alcanza el presente.
A medida que avanzamos en los capítulos de la historia pasada de la protagonista, que la voy a nombrar como "milady", y también de su antagonista el cardenal Richelieu, el lector va conociendo los hechos y adquiriendo más conocimientos al respecto, por lo que algunos sucesos de los intermedios comienzan a tener sentido y empiezan a conectarse con el pasado lentamente. El presente y el pasado no se conectan de golpe al final de la historia, sino que hay un proceso en donde los hilos narrativos se van uniendo de una forma armónica, y van generando giros y sorpresas a lo largo del libro. Es una idea simplemente genial.
Cada capítulo es narrado en primera persona por distintas voces, conoceremos la historia de milady desde su propia perspectiva y desde la perspectiva de los demás, entregándonos una visión completa del personaje, tanto interior como exterior, es imposible no empatizar con ella. La autora la coloca constantemente en situaciones desventajosas, desde el día de su nacimiento, a veces por obra del destino y otras por sus propios actos. Pero también le entrega herramientas y la empuja a descubrir cómo utilizarlas para salir de los atolladeros en que se mete.
En los tres mosqueteros predominan las aventuras de estos cuatro personajes, ellos son los protagonistas. Pero en esta historia pasan a segundo plano, y todo gira en torno a milady y Richelieu. Se conocen a fondo sus historias; desde sus antepasados. Nos presenta un crecimiento progresivo de los personajes en base a sus experiencias y desiciones personales. Se entiende cómo llegan a ser tan calculadores y manipuladores.
Hay un desarrollo psicológico de personajes, tanto de principales como de algunos secundarios, gracias a eso, no son las aventuras las que marcan el ritmo y mueven a los personajes, son sus propias pasiones, anhelos y deseos más íntimos los que gatillan sus acciones. La autora se mete en el profundo y misterioso terreno de la naturaleza humana, en la dualidad de los actos, en la doble moralidad. Nadie es completamente justo, ni completamente honesto, todos buscan su beneficio personal: la riqueza, el poder, el placer, el honor, la fama, la venganza. Son temas recurrentes en una sociedad marcada por la rigidez con que se trata el destino de los hijos, sin derecho a elegir, cada uno ya tiene un papel que desempeñar, siendo las mujeres las más afectadas y desvaloradas, donde su educación debe consistir en saber cantar, bailar y cómo conseguir un marido que le convenga y haga subir a la familia en la escala social. La autora rompe esos rígidos esquemas con la protagonista, que no se deja amedrentar por las tradiciones y sigue fiel a su corazón indomable y salvaje. Además en este ambiente que avasalla a la mujer, la autora puebla la historia de otros fuertes personajes femeninos que se abren oportunidades con destreza e inteligencia. En un mundo que las oprime, las mujeres destacan en la novela y tienen papeles sumamente importantes para la trama.
El libro tiene un excelente trabajo de documentación. Nos recrea aquellos años de forma muy precisa. Es notable como describe los bajos fondos y las tierras boscosas y los contrasta con la opulencia y la majestuosidad de la vida en la corte. La exactitud de las vestimentas, la joyas, los accesorios y el maquillaje en la mujeres resulta perfecto, al igual que la indumentaria de los hombres y sus armas. Las actitudes, los gestos y los modales, todo muy detallado. Las fechas, el desarrollo de los hechos, todo muy cuidado. Incluso incluye un bibliografía en las últimas páginas.
El final, cuando se terminan de unir todos los hilos del pasado con los del presente, genera una de las escenas más intensas y gloriosas de la historia, con unos diálogos que me encantaron, hacen reflexionar sobre la verdadera justicia, sobre los falsos valores en que se juzgan las acciones de otros, sobre la ignorancia a lo desconocido y la cobardía de reconocerlo. Y sobre todo de la valentía de una mujer que nunca dejó de luchar y siempre reconoció sus errores.
Reseña completa en: http://eligeunlibro.blogspot.cl/2017/...
El cardenal utiliza diversos medios para lograr sus objetivos, y entre ellos está la utilización de espías y mensajeros con enlaces en el extranjero. Debido a esto, reclutó a una hábil y bella mujer que se ganó su confianza, de la cual no sospechaba su verdadera identidad. Lo que terminó provocando la fuga de delicados documentos que podrían poner en riesgo la seguridad del reino, y quizá la suya propia. Para resarcirse de este error, el cardenal envía a su mejor hombre, León Bouthillier, con drásticas instrucciones para su captura.
"Es un conspirador, un espía y un traidor sin escrúpulos, capaz de matar a cualquiera que se interponga en su camino. Habla varios idiomas con fluidez, puede cambiar de identidad rápidamente, y se mueve con la misma facilidad en Francia, en Inglaterra y en los territorios del imperio". Pág. 14.
León inicia un camino que lo dirigirá a un curioso destino elegido por el propio Richelieu. Acompañado por extraños personajes, seguirá la huella de esta misteriosa mujer, de la cual, durante el transcurso de la persecución, irá conociendo su pasado. Los detalles de su vida y sus orígenes familiares, se remontan hacia finales del siglo XVI, en los tiempos del Rey Enrique IV.
Aun antes de nacer, su destino ya había sido trazado como desafortunado. Fue apartada de la estirpe familiar desde muy pequeña y rechazada por sus más cercanos cuando más lo necesitaba. Su carácter independiente y una curiosidad insaciable, la llevó a formar una personalidad que combinaba un gran intelecto con una fuerza interior capaz resistir cualquier adversidad.
"Vuestra hija es una salvaje. ¡Una vergüenza para la familia! No puedo hacer nada por ella, salvo rezar". Pág. 157.
Ella acepta las consecuencias de sus propias acciones, pero no está dispuesta a pagar por falsas acusaciones, ni menos por traiciones. Lo que la lleva a huir para sobrevivir y tramar su propia venganza, llevando consigo la marca maldita del lirio. Es un largo camino el que recorre a través de los barrios más humildes y miserables de Francia e Inglaterra, pero con ingenio y sacrificio, logra incluso ser aceptada en ambas cortes, donde utilizará toda su astucia y conocimientos para satisfacer todos sus anhelos.
"..., la expiación y la renuncia al mundo no era un precio demasiado alto por seguir viviendo". Pág. 222.
Esta novela se basa en los mismos hechos que hicieron famoso a Alexandre Dumas con "Los tres mosqueteros". Pero está narrado de una manera completamente diferente, más adulta, madura y mucho más profunda. Y desde luego, desde un punto de vista completamente diferente. El resultado es que, los que conocemos y adoramos "Los tres mosqueteros", también amaremos este libro, y los que no han leído a Dumas, lo amarán aún más.
Lo primero que sorprende, es el juego narrativo que nos propone desde el inicio. Adoro cuando los autores se ponen creativos: empezamos por el epílogo. Sí, por el epílogo, una idea fantástica para no presentar la historia de forma lineal, vale decir, empezamos por el final. Pero sería ilógico contar el fin antes que el resto de la historia, por eso la autora nos va presentando el epílogo por partes, a través de intermedios. Al inicio nos cuenta lo justo y necesario para ponernos en alerta y obligarnos a seguir indagando en la novela, y luego aparecen los capítulos de la historia que nos remontan al pasado, cuya fecha de inicio es 1588, entre un capítulo y otro hay un corto intermedio fechado siempre en 1632, se van alternando en la historia, hasta que el pasado alcanza el presente.
A medida que avanzamos en los capítulos de la historia pasada de la protagonista, que la voy a nombrar como "milady", y también de su antagonista el cardenal Richelieu, el lector va conociendo los hechos y adquiriendo más conocimientos al respecto, por lo que algunos sucesos de los intermedios comienzan a tener sentido y empiezan a conectarse con el pasado lentamente. El presente y el pasado no se conectan de golpe al final de la historia, sino que hay un proceso en donde los hilos narrativos se van uniendo de una forma armónica, y van generando giros y sorpresas a lo largo del libro. Es una idea simplemente genial.
Cada capítulo es narrado en primera persona por distintas voces, conoceremos la historia de milady desde su propia perspectiva y desde la perspectiva de los demás, entregándonos una visión completa del personaje, tanto interior como exterior, es imposible no empatizar con ella. La autora la coloca constantemente en situaciones desventajosas, desde el día de su nacimiento, a veces por obra del destino y otras por sus propios actos. Pero también le entrega herramientas y la empuja a descubrir cómo utilizarlas para salir de los atolladeros en que se mete.
En los tres mosqueteros predominan las aventuras de estos cuatro personajes, ellos son los protagonistas. Pero en esta historia pasan a segundo plano, y todo gira en torno a milady y Richelieu. Se conocen a fondo sus historias; desde sus antepasados. Nos presenta un crecimiento progresivo de los personajes en base a sus experiencias y desiciones personales. Se entiende cómo llegan a ser tan calculadores y manipuladores.
Hay un desarrollo psicológico de personajes, tanto de principales como de algunos secundarios, gracias a eso, no son las aventuras las que marcan el ritmo y mueven a los personajes, son sus propias pasiones, anhelos y deseos más íntimos los que gatillan sus acciones. La autora se mete en el profundo y misterioso terreno de la naturaleza humana, en la dualidad de los actos, en la doble moralidad. Nadie es completamente justo, ni completamente honesto, todos buscan su beneficio personal: la riqueza, el poder, el placer, el honor, la fama, la venganza. Son temas recurrentes en una sociedad marcada por la rigidez con que se trata el destino de los hijos, sin derecho a elegir, cada uno ya tiene un papel que desempeñar, siendo las mujeres las más afectadas y desvaloradas, donde su educación debe consistir en saber cantar, bailar y cómo conseguir un marido que le convenga y haga subir a la familia en la escala social. La autora rompe esos rígidos esquemas con la protagonista, que no se deja amedrentar por las tradiciones y sigue fiel a su corazón indomable y salvaje. Además en este ambiente que avasalla a la mujer, la autora puebla la historia de otros fuertes personajes femeninos que se abren oportunidades con destreza e inteligencia. En un mundo que las oprime, las mujeres destacan en la novela y tienen papeles sumamente importantes para la trama.
El libro tiene un excelente trabajo de documentación. Nos recrea aquellos años de forma muy precisa. Es notable como describe los bajos fondos y las tierras boscosas y los contrasta con la opulencia y la majestuosidad de la vida en la corte. La exactitud de las vestimentas, la joyas, los accesorios y el maquillaje en la mujeres resulta perfecto, al igual que la indumentaria de los hombres y sus armas. Las actitudes, los gestos y los modales, todo muy detallado. Las fechas, el desarrollo de los hechos, todo muy cuidado. Incluso incluye un bibliografía en las últimas páginas.
El final, cuando se terminan de unir todos los hilos del pasado con los del presente, genera una de las escenas más intensas y gloriosas de la historia, con unos diálogos que me encantaron, hacen reflexionar sobre la verdadera justicia, sobre los falsos valores en que se juzgan las acciones de otros, sobre la ignorancia a lo desconocido y la cobardía de reconocerlo. Y sobre todo de la valentía de una mujer que nunca dejó de luchar y siempre reconoció sus errores.
Reseña completa en: http://eligeunlibro.blogspot.cl/2017/...
February 6, 2018
The third book of the series, essentially the book that closes Merlin's trilogy. In this we generally follow the well-known story, although because of the nature of the series so far we are following the events mainly from a distance, with the exception of some very important moments where the magician of our story is directly involved. On the one hand, of course, that does not mean very good things, since essentially very important pieces of King Arthur's story that have even some historical background are left out. On the other hand, however, the things that remain allow us to infiltrate still more to Merlin's character as the writer puts us deep into his psychology, showing us what his own desires are and the way he perceives all power games played. Perhaps in the end this is the main purpose of this series, to show us the perspective of a man who is part of this story but at the same time he keeps the necessary distance to see things more cool. In any case, there may not be the usual narrative in this series but certainly there is enough interest. Of course one book still remains, the one with the final battle, so there may be compensation for those seeking a more common approach.
So this book may not be something realy great, but it's definitely worth out appreciation. Especially when we reach the most critical points this value becomes greater as the writer delivers them in a very beautiful way that excites and moves. In contrast, with the two previous I found less points of it indifferent. That's why I think it's definitely the best book in the series so far and definitely the perfect finish for Merlin's story. Beyond that I expect to go to the next book and the big finale to make the final conclusions.
Τρίτο βιβλίο της σειράς, ουσιαστικά το βιβλίο που κλείνει την τριλογία του Μέρλιν. Σε αυτό ακολουθούμε σε γενικές γραμμές την πολύ γνωστή ιστορία αν και εξαιτίας της φύσης της σειράς ως τώρα παρακολουθούμε τα γεγονότα κυρίως από κάποια απόσταση, με εξαίρεση μερικές πολύ σημαντικές στιγμές όπου ο μάγος της ιστορίας μας έχει άμεση εμπλοκή. Από τη μία, φυσικά, αυτό δεν σημαίνει και πολύ καλά πράγματα καθώς ουσιαστικά πολύ σημαντικά κομμάτια της ιστορίας του βασιλιά Αρθούρου που έχουν μάλιστα και κ��ποια ιστορική βάση μένουν απέξω. Από την άλλη, όμως, αυτά που μένουν μας επιτρέπουν να διεισδύσουμε ακόμα περισσότερο στον χαρακτήρα του Μέρλιν καθώς η συγγραφέας μας βάζει πολύ βαθιά στην ψυχολογία του, δείχνοντάς μας τι δικές του επιθυμίες που αναγκαστικά βάζει στην άκρη και τον τρόπο που αντιλαμβάνεται όλα τα παιχνίδια εξουσίας που παίζονται. Ίσως στο τέλος αυτός είναι και ο κύριος σκοπός αυτής της σειράς, να μας δείξει την οπτική γωνία ενός ανθρώπου που είναι μέρος αυτής της ιστορίας αλλά παράλληλα διατηρεί και την απαραίτητη απόσταση για να βλέπει ��α πράγματα πιο ψύχραιμα. Όπως και να έχει μπορεί να μην υπάρχει σε αυτή τη σειρά η συνηθισμένη αφήγηση αλλά σίγουρα υπάρχει αρκετό ενδιαφέρον. Βέβαια μένει ακόμα το βιβλίο με την τελική μάχη οπότε ίσως υπάρχει εκεί η αποζημίωση για όσους αποζητούν μία πιο συνηθισμένη προσέγγιση.
Οπότε αυτό το βιβλίο μπορεί να μην είναι κάτι συγκλονιστικό αλλά σίγουρα έχει την αξία του. Ειδικά όταν φτάνουμε στα πιο κρίσιμα σημεία αυτή η αξία γίνεται μεγαλύτερη καθώς η συγγραφέας τα αποδίδει με έναν πολύ όμορφο τρόπο που συναρπάζει και συγκινεί. Σε αντίθεση, μάλιστα, με τα δύο προηγούμενα βρήκα σχετικά διαφορά λιγότερα σημεία του. Για αυτό νομίζω ότι σίγουρα είναι το καλύτερο βιβλίο της σειράς ως τώρα και σίγουρα το ιδανικό τελείωμα για την ιστορία του Μέρλιν. Από εκεί και πέρα περιμέ��ω να προχωρήσω στο επόμενο βιβλίο και στο μεγάλο φινάλε για να βγάλω και τα τελικά συμπεράσματα.
So this book may not be something realy great, but it's definitely worth out appreciation. Especially when we reach the most critical points this value becomes greater as the writer delivers them in a very beautiful way that excites and moves. In contrast, with the two previous I found less points of it indifferent. That's why I think it's definitely the best book in the series so far and definitely the perfect finish for Merlin's story. Beyond that I expect to go to the next book and the big finale to make the final conclusions.
Τρίτο βιβλίο της σειράς, ουσιαστικά το βιβλίο που κλείνει την τριλογία του Μέρλιν. Σε αυτό ακολουθούμε σε γενικές γραμμές την πολύ γνωστή ιστορία αν και εξαιτίας της φύσης της σειράς ως τώρα παρακολουθούμε τα γεγονότα κυρίως από κάποια απόσταση, με εξαίρεση μερικές πολύ σημαντικές στιγμές όπου ο μάγος της ιστορίας μας έχει άμεση εμπλοκή. Από τη μία, φυσικά, αυτό δεν σημαίνει και πολύ καλά πράγματα καθώς ουσιαστικά πολύ σημαντικά κομμάτια της ιστορίας του βασιλιά Αρθούρου που έχουν μάλιστα και κ��ποια ιστορική βάση μένουν απέξω. Από την άλλη, όμως, αυτά που μένουν μας επιτρέπουν να διεισδύσουμε ακόμα περισσότερο στον χαρακτήρα του Μέρλιν καθώς η συγγραφέας μας βάζει πολύ βαθιά στην ψυχολογία του, δείχνοντάς μας τι δικές του επιθυμίες που αναγκαστικά βάζει στην άκρη και τον τρόπο που αντιλαμβάνεται όλα τα παιχνίδια εξουσίας που παίζονται. Ίσως στο τέλος αυτός είναι και ο κύριος σκοπός αυτής της σειράς, να μας δείξει την οπτική γωνία ενός ανθρώπου που είναι μέρος αυτής της ιστορίας αλλά παράλληλα διατηρεί και την απαραίτητη απόσταση για να βλέπει ��α πράγματα πιο ψύχραιμα. Όπως και να έχει μπορεί να μην υπάρχει σε αυτή τη σειρά η συνηθισμένη αφήγηση αλλά σίγουρα υπάρχει αρκετό ενδιαφέρον. Βέβαια μένει ακόμα το βιβλίο με την τελική μάχη οπότε ίσως υπάρχει εκεί η αποζημίωση για όσους αποζητούν μία πιο συνηθισμένη προσέγγιση.
Οπότε αυτό το βιβλίο μπορεί να μην είναι κάτι συγκλονιστικό αλλά σίγουρα έχει την αξία του. Ειδικά όταν φτάνουμε στα πιο κρίσιμα σημεία αυτή η αξία γίνεται μεγαλύτερη καθώς η συγγραφέας τα αποδίδει με έναν πολύ όμορφο τρόπο που συναρπάζει και συγκινεί. Σε αντίθεση, μάλιστα, με τα δύο προηγούμενα βρήκα σχετικά διαφορά λιγότερα σημεία του. Για αυτό νομίζω ότι σίγουρα είναι το καλύτερο βιβλίο της σειράς ως τώρα και σίγουρα το ιδανικό τελείωμα για την ιστορία του Μέρλιν. Από εκεί και πέρα περιμέ��ω να προχωρήσω στο επόμενο βιβλίο και στο μεγάλο φινάλε για να βγάλω και τα τελικά συμπεράσματα.
October 12, 2020
The Last Enchantment by Mary Stewart is the 3rd book in the Arthurian Saga. This book pretty much picks up where the 2nd book left off. Arthur is King. While Arthur is learning to run the kingdom, protect his people, and keep out of danger, Merlin does his best to watch out for him. Merlin and Arthur do have one thing in common in this installment…love. On top of everything else, both have to navigate these emotions and the effect they have on their reality.
“Not every king would care to start his reign with the wholesale massacre of children.”
THE LAST ENCHANTMENT
What a killer opening line! Unfortunately…that is the most intense part of the book. Merlin’s character does get a bit better in this book. He was insufferable in The Hollow Hills. My main issue in this book is just the lack of plot and climax in this installment. The pace is slow. I know she is drawing from the legends but the love plotlines are not enough to hold this book. It needed more. I just felt so disconnected from the story and the characters.
By far, my favorite in the series is book one, The Crystal Cave. The series just seems to keep going on without a focal point. It is just Arthur doing his kingly duties and Merlin going off and watching over Arthur. However, I do love that there are more female characters in this book. I am just saying, I would LOVE a book that focuses on Nimue. So I rate this book 3 out of 5 stars.
“Not every king would care to start his reign with the wholesale massacre of children.”
THE LAST ENCHANTMENT
What a killer opening line! Unfortunately…that is the most intense part of the book. Merlin’s character does get a bit better in this book. He was insufferable in The Hollow Hills. My main issue in this book is just the lack of plot and climax in this installment. The pace is slow. I know she is drawing from the legends but the love plotlines are not enough to hold this book. It needed more. I just felt so disconnected from the story and the characters.
By far, my favorite in the series is book one, The Crystal Cave. The series just seems to keep going on without a focal point. It is just Arthur doing his kingly duties and Merlin going off and watching over Arthur. However, I do love that there are more female characters in this book. I am just saying, I would LOVE a book that focuses on Nimue. So I rate this book 3 out of 5 stars.
June 19, 2007
I've been reading this King Arthur series over and over since I was a teenager. I love it so much, I have a hard time reading any other version of the King Arthur tale. The series is written from the viewpoint of Merlin.
January 10, 2024
The Last Enchantment was the third of the Arthurian Saga series and the final book in the Merlin Trilogy by Mary Stewart. The trilogy began with The Crystal Cave and The Hollow Hills where we see the long-awaited coronation to the height ofKing Arthur's reign. in The Last Enchantment, Arthur Pendragon is King, unchallenged and victorious on the battlefield as he melds the country together in a time of progress and enlightenment. However, there are sinister forces to destroy Camelot and King Arthur. Another riveting book with the makings of legends throughout this beautiful narrative. But it was with this magical and enchanting narrative that we must say good-by to Merlin as we witness the first decline of his powers as he goes to his final retreat beneath Bryn Myrddin.
And the final visit as King Arthur stops once more to visit with Merlin at Bryn Myrrddin:
Rest here, enchanter, while the fire dies.---- MERLIN
In a breath, in an eyelid's fall,
You will see them, the dreams;
The sword and the young king,
The white horse and the running water,
The lit lamp and the boy smiling.
Dreams, dreams, enchanter! Gone
With the harp's echo when the strings
Full mute; with the flame's shadow when the fire
Dies. Be still, and listen.
Far on the black air
Blows the great wind, rises
The running tide, flows the clear river.
Listen, enchanter, hear
Through the black air and the singing and the singing air
The music. . .
And the final visit as King Arthur stops once more to visit with Merlin at Bryn Myrrddin:
"It was almost night, but over beyond Maridunum in the west, a lingering bar of light hinted at the dying sun. It threw a glint on the river skirting the palace wall where I was born, and touched a jewel spark on the distant sea. Near at hand the trees were bare with winter, and the ground crisp with the first frost. Arthur trod away from me across the grass, leaving ghostprints in the frost. He reached the place where the track led down to the grove, and half turned. I saw him raise a hand."
July 31, 2009
And now a happy story.
I read the original Merlin trilogy pretty much when it came out...I was 10 when I read The Crystal Cave and The Hollow Hills, and had to wait until I was 16 before Mary Stewart put out this book, the final book of the (then) trilogy. And what I remember was being disappointed in The Last Enchantment. It seemed like an afterthought, and a muddled one at that.
So, okay, fast forward--I couldn't sleep a couple of nights ago, and I wolfed down The Crystal Cave and The Hollow Hills in one massive, insomnia-fueled gulp. I was absolutely thrilled to find out that, unlike a lot of books, they were still as good as I had remembered...better in many ways. But the real surprise was this book, which I saved for today. It is different from the first two books in the series; it's a more adult book. And I can see now what I couldn't see at 16; that the narrative voice ages with the narrator throughout the series. In this, his final book, the narrator (Merlin, for those that don't know) slips into old age and gives up his story--and, in a sense, his life--with the calm and depth of a man who has lived a good life...and knows it. A terrific book.
I read the original Merlin trilogy pretty much when it came out...I was 10 when I read The Crystal Cave and The Hollow Hills, and had to wait until I was 16 before Mary Stewart put out this book, the final book of the (then) trilogy. And what I remember was being disappointed in The Last Enchantment. It seemed like an afterthought, and a muddled one at that.
So, okay, fast forward--I couldn't sleep a couple of nights ago, and I wolfed down The Crystal Cave and The Hollow Hills in one massive, insomnia-fueled gulp. I was absolutely thrilled to find out that, unlike a lot of books, they were still as good as I had remembered...better in many ways. But the real surprise was this book, which I saved for today. It is different from the first two books in the series; it's a more adult book. And I can see now what I couldn't see at 16; that the narrative voice ages with the narrator throughout the series. In this, his final book, the narrator (Merlin, for those that don't know) slips into old age and gives up his story--and, in a sense, his life--with the calm and depth of a man who has lived a good life...and knows it. A terrific book.
March 27, 2016
The Last Enchantment really suffers the most from the fact that it’s written from the point of view of a supporting character. Merlin’s an epic, iconic figure, but he’s not Arthur — and this version emphasises this even more, with Arthur’s seemingly endless heroism, patience, temperance and sensitivity. I love the Arthurian story too, but it feels like Stewart shielded almost all the characters from harm — even, in this case, some of the female characters, despite the misogynistic to ambiguous treatment in the rest of the series. She has surprising sympathy for Guinevere, particularly, considering she had no mercy for Morgause.
Stewart weaves in an astonishing number of the disparate stories — the two Guineveres, Nimue/Niniane/Vivien, Melwas, etc — but, almost because of that, it lacks richness to me. It feels like everything-and-the-kitchen-sink, especially with the way she shields her characters from the consequences; we’ve got Nimue and Merlin in a love story, and Nimue does indeed bury Merlin alive, and yet she didn’t mean to. And Merlin is buried alive and ‘dies’ there, but… he doesn’t die.
The writing is still good, and it was entertaining enough, but… this series falls short of excellence.
Originally posted here.
Stewart weaves in an astonishing number of the disparate stories — the two Guineveres, Nimue/Niniane/Vivien, Melwas, etc — but, almost because of that, it lacks richness to me. It feels like everything-and-the-kitchen-sink, especially with the way she shields her characters from the consequences; we’ve got Nimue and Merlin in a love story, and Nimue does indeed bury Merlin alive, and yet she didn’t mean to. And Merlin is buried alive and ‘dies’ there, but… he doesn’t die.
The writing is still good, and it was entertaining enough, but… this series falls short of excellence.
Originally posted here.
October 16, 2018
Mi perfil de lector es: hombre, sesentón, jubilado. Me gusta la novela histórica de aventuras al estilo de Stevenson, Dumas, y Alatriste, más si incluye mujeres fuertes. Cuando vi el título y la portada (solo le faltan tres espadas cruzadas), y que iba de intrigas en Francia con el cardenal Richelieu, la pedí enseguida.
La edición es de coleccionista: pedí el de tapa blanda pero Amazon me envió de tapa dura, con páginas color crema, dibujos estupendos, y letras capitales. Me la leí en tres días, eso que los capítulos son largos y me tuvo hasta las tantas, para no romper el hilo.
Como todos conocen de memoria “Los Tres Mosqueteros”, no estropeo esta novela si digo que tiene lo principal: milady, su primer marido convertido en mosquetero, su segundo marido, el robo de diamantes, Buckingham y la reina, los duelos, el sitio de La Rochela, y cómo no, el lirio de fuego, que da título a la novela. Solo que, con Dumas, los protagonistas son los mosqueteros (que son y no son los mismos), y aquí, es milady: los mosqueteros también salen, pero ya no llevan la voz cantante. Es una idea arriesgada, porque la obra de Dumas es tan requetefamosa, pero funciona bien.
La estructura es curiosa. Hay tres protagonistas: milady, Richelieu, y el espía jefe del cardenal. El principal es ella, una mujer ingenua y astuta a la vez, sensual y vulnerable, tozuda y valiente, capaz de gran crueldad, pero también de grandes sacrificios, y tan manipuladora como el cardenal. Me llamó la atención que ni una mujer está de relleno, todas sirven para mostrar su papel en una época en que comienzan a abrirse paso, sin derechos, pero con mucho tesón.
Hay tres hilos: la historia del cardenal y su familia (que me puso los pelos de punta), la de milady (por eso los mosqueteros salen en la segunda parte, en vez de ya al principio), y la del espía que persigue a milady hasta que el pasado llega al presente, y los tres hilos coinciden en el clímax. Hay escenarios cambiantes, París, Londres, una ciudad española, palacios, cárceles, conventos, y la corte. Da muchos giros y vueltas, hay que leerla con calma, para no perderse las pistas que van saltando para resolver los enigmas en la novela.
Es una historia con varios narradores. Unos conocen bien al cardenal y otros a milady, y se pasan el testigo segun avanza la historia: una niña noble, un médico pobre, un viejo señor, una bandida, etc. Los personajes, los lugares y los hechos son auténticos. Si pone que tal castillo tenía tal decoración, o tal día hubo luna llena y nieve, o fulano dijo algo o vestía así cuando lo mataron, tengo la manía de comprobarlo: el nivel de documentación es increíble (al final hay una bibliografía, que es estupenda).
En vez de repetir las andanzas y el punto de vista que ya conocemos, el enfoque pasa a milady y el cardenal, las figuras más interesantes, ahondando en ellos para recrear el cuadro de toda una época, con sus conflictos religiosos, políticos, y sociales (la ciencia contra la fe, el humanismo contra el fanatismo, etc). En milady y el cardenal, se ve cómo el contexto histórico determina sus vida, sus decisiones, y cómo luchan con ingenio y voluntad por decidir su destino en condiciones contrarias. No es una de esas novelas donde lo histórico es una excusa para dar más peso y colorido a una trama y unos personajes de por sí sosos, que suenan falsos y anacrónicos. Aquí, los personajes son el producto de su época, y por eso, su sicología es convincente.
Es una novela histórica de aventuras, pero va más allá. Es un estudio de la ambición, la venganza, las rencillas familiares, y me gusta que el autor muestre siempre las dos caras de la moneda, sin juzgar, para que el lector saque sus propias conclusiones. Me gustó toda, pero mis capítulos favoritos son el que cuenta “Athos” (como viudo reciente, me llegó muy hondo, y me emocionó), y la ladrona Sangrabolsa.
El estilo es refinado, la sintaxis es impecable (eso debería darse por sentado, pero ya no es así), y el vocabulario es muy rico, sin ser cargante. El diálogo es ameno, y hay mucha ironía en las minucias que pintan a los personajes de cuerpo entero: como un cura sabelotodo y un hugonote, que cuando hablan en latín para apabullar, van y meten la pata, o la sífilis de un protagonista, que jamás se menciona, pero se van revelando sus síntomas, y sus terribles secuelas físicas y mentales).
Un pero: la novela es para adultos, no para niños. Al contrario que “Los Tres Mosqueteros”, donde ganan los buenos, y hay final feliz, “El lirio de fuego” tiene escenas muy crudas y sexo, y a pesar de las partes alegres, es pesimista. Muy pocos personajes consiguen sus sueños de amor, libertad o poder, y tienen que pagar un precio muy alto.
Me gustó lo bastante para releerla, porque seguro que se me han escapado cosas. Se la recomiendo al que busque una novela histórica de una calidad que la hace especial. También se puede leer de corrido, como la típica historia de evasión.
Cuatro estrellas por atreverse con “Los Tres Mosqueteros”, con las comparaciones inevitables, y salir tan bien parada, porque está a la altura. Si hubiera sido una historia original al cien por cien, le daría las cinco.
EDITADO: qué leñes, la gran cantidad de bodrios históricos que tuve la desgracia de leer durante mi convalecencia durante muchos meses me han hecho replantearme el mérito que tienen obras tan redondas como esta. Corrijo la nota hacia arriba, y me veo revisando también otras calificaciones que hice en el pasado. El tiempo pone a los libros en su lugar, igual que a las personas.
La edición es de coleccionista: pedí el de tapa blanda pero Amazon me envió de tapa dura, con páginas color crema, dibujos estupendos, y letras capitales. Me la leí en tres días, eso que los capítulos son largos y me tuvo hasta las tantas, para no romper el hilo.
Como todos conocen de memoria “Los Tres Mosqueteros”, no estropeo esta novela si digo que tiene lo principal: milady, su primer marido convertido en mosquetero, su segundo marido, el robo de diamantes, Buckingham y la reina, los duelos, el sitio de La Rochela, y cómo no, el lirio de fuego, que da título a la novela. Solo que, con Dumas, los protagonistas son los mosqueteros (que son y no son los mismos), y aquí, es milady: los mosqueteros también salen, pero ya no llevan la voz cantante. Es una idea arriesgada, porque la obra de Dumas es tan requetefamosa, pero funciona bien.
La estructura es curiosa. Hay tres protagonistas: milady, Richelieu, y el espía jefe del cardenal. El principal es ella, una mujer ingenua y astuta a la vez, sensual y vulnerable, tozuda y valiente, capaz de gran crueldad, pero también de grandes sacrificios, y tan manipuladora como el cardenal. Me llamó la atención que ni una mujer está de relleno, todas sirven para mostrar su papel en una época en que comienzan a abrirse paso, sin derechos, pero con mucho tesón.
Hay tres hilos: la historia del cardenal y su familia (que me puso los pelos de punta), la de milady (por eso los mosqueteros salen en la segunda parte, en vez de ya al principio), y la del espía que persigue a milady hasta que el pasado llega al presente, y los tres hilos coinciden en el clímax. Hay escenarios cambiantes, París, Londres, una ciudad española, palacios, cárceles, conventos, y la corte. Da muchos giros y vueltas, hay que leerla con calma, para no perderse las pistas que van saltando para resolver los enigmas en la novela.
Es una historia con varios narradores. Unos conocen bien al cardenal y otros a milady, y se pasan el testigo segun avanza la historia: una niña noble, un médico pobre, un viejo señor, una bandida, etc. Los personajes, los lugares y los hechos son auténticos. Si pone que tal castillo tenía tal decoración, o tal día hubo luna llena y nieve, o fulano dijo algo o vestía así cuando lo mataron, tengo la manía de comprobarlo: el nivel de documentación es increíble (al final hay una bibliografía, que es estupenda).
En vez de repetir las andanzas y el punto de vista que ya conocemos, el enfoque pasa a milady y el cardenal, las figuras más interesantes, ahondando en ellos para recrear el cuadro de toda una época, con sus conflictos religiosos, políticos, y sociales (la ciencia contra la fe, el humanismo contra el fanatismo, etc). En milady y el cardenal, se ve cómo el contexto histórico determina sus vida, sus decisiones, y cómo luchan con ingenio y voluntad por decidir su destino en condiciones contrarias. No es una de esas novelas donde lo histórico es una excusa para dar más peso y colorido a una trama y unos personajes de por sí sosos, que suenan falsos y anacrónicos. Aquí, los personajes son el producto de su época, y por eso, su sicología es convincente.
Es una novela histórica de aventuras, pero va más allá. Es un estudio de la ambición, la venganza, las rencillas familiares, y me gusta que el autor muestre siempre las dos caras de la moneda, sin juzgar, para que el lector saque sus propias conclusiones. Me gustó toda, pero mis capítulos favoritos son el que cuenta “Athos” (como viudo reciente, me llegó muy hondo, y me emocionó), y la ladrona Sangrabolsa.
El estilo es refinado, la sintaxis es impecable (eso debería darse por sentado, pero ya no es así), y el vocabulario es muy rico, sin ser cargante. El diálogo es ameno, y hay mucha ironía en las minucias que pintan a los personajes de cuerpo entero: como un cura sabelotodo y un hugonote, que cuando hablan en latín para apabullar, van y meten la pata, o la sífilis de un protagonista, que jamás se menciona, pero se van revelando sus síntomas, y sus terribles secuelas físicas y mentales).
Un pero: la novela es para adultos, no para niños. Al contrario que “Los Tres Mosqueteros”, donde ganan los buenos, y hay final feliz, “El lirio de fuego” tiene escenas muy crudas y sexo, y a pesar de las partes alegres, es pesimista. Muy pocos personajes consiguen sus sueños de amor, libertad o poder, y tienen que pagar un precio muy alto.
Me gustó lo bastante para releerla, porque seguro que se me han escapado cosas. Se la recomiendo al que busque una novela histórica de una calidad que la hace especial. También se puede leer de corrido, como la típica historia de evasión.
Cuatro estrellas por atreverse con “Los Tres Mosqueteros”, con las comparaciones inevitables, y salir tan bien parada, porque está a la altura. Si hubiera sido una historia original al cien por cien, le daría las cinco.
EDITADO: qué leñes, la gran cantidad de bodrios históricos que tuve la desgracia de leer durante mi convalecencia durante muchos meses me han hecho replantearme el mérito que tienen obras tan redondas como esta. Corrijo la nota hacia arriba, y me veo revisando también otras calificaciones que hice en el pasado. El tiempo pone a los libros en su lugar, igual que a las personas.
August 3, 2018
Getting back to this with the Mary Stewart group. July 2018
Oooo! This is the best of the 3 for me. Full review to follow. Very satisfying read.
Oooo! This is the best of the 3 for me. Full review to follow. Very satisfying read.
January 3, 2017
I tried very hard to get into this book. It was so hard. I think that it ended up ending in a weird place and after going forward and reading “The Wicked Day” I really wish that Stewart had ended this book better to just stay away from continuing the Arthurian saga.
There is really not much to say that I haven’t said in the other books. I like Merlin as a narrator, but everyone else is given very little development. The book starts to feel repetitive after a while. The only new thing in this one is that Stewart throws Merlin a curve ball by having him fall in love. Now this character, Nimue ends up being very important to the story, and I do applaud Stewart for having her be a heck of a lot wiser and even stronger than Merlin. But other than that, it’s same old same old. Merlin rides around a lot looking out for Arthur while Arthur is elsewhere doing kingly things. I am being facetious but honestly I was so bored while reading this book. There is very little action.
I was ultimately bored while reading this unfortunately. I think because Stewart didn’t really show me anything new here. We know that Morgause is evil (I say that while twirling my invisible mustache) but I honestly felt more bored by her than anything. I think it’s because Stewart does a lot of telling to the readers about what Morgause is up to so you feel like you are hearing this story from a random guy who tries to chat you up at the bar. You just smile politely hoping he moves on soon so you can go back to drinking your wine/beer/shot.
Since I am really familiar with the legend of King Arthur, his queen, Guinevere, Lancelot, Camelot, etc. I didn’t see anything new under the sun here. I think this book paints Arthur more naive than anything rather than some paragon of virtue.
The last part of the book is seriously Merlin just being told everything while he was “absent” from the story. I think it could have been interesting showing how Merlin’s ability to communicate with the gods was waning and how that left him feeling adrift. Instead this whole book was really about him
I think the ending was abrupt and was lacking some oomph that for all it’s faults that I had with “The Hollow Hills” at least delivered on by having Arthur crowned king. Maybe Stewart should have just ended the book with the end of Camelot instead of trying to stretch that out into a fourth book.
There is really not much to say that I haven’t said in the other books. I like Merlin as a narrator, but everyone else is given very little development. The book starts to feel repetitive after a while. The only new thing in this one is that Stewart throws Merlin a curve ball by having him fall in love. Now this character, Nimue ends up being very important to the story, and I do applaud Stewart for having her be a heck of a lot wiser and even stronger than Merlin. But other than that, it’s same old same old. Merlin rides around a lot looking out for Arthur while Arthur is elsewhere doing kingly things. I am being facetious but honestly I was so bored while reading this book. There is very little action.
I was ultimately bored while reading this unfortunately. I think because Stewart didn’t really show me anything new here. We know that Morgause is evil (I say that while twirling my invisible mustache) but I honestly felt more bored by her than anything. I think it’s because Stewart does a lot of telling to the readers about what Morgause is up to so you feel like you are hearing this story from a random guy who tries to chat you up at the bar. You just smile politely hoping he moves on soon so you can go back to drinking your wine/beer/shot.
Since I am really familiar with the legend of King Arthur, his queen, Guinevere, Lancelot, Camelot, etc. I didn’t see anything new under the sun here. I think this book paints Arthur more naive than anything rather than some paragon of virtue.
The last part of the book is seriously Merlin just being told everything while he was “absent” from the story. I think it could have been interesting showing how Merlin’s ability to communicate with the gods was waning and how that left him feeling adrift. Instead this whole book was really about him
I think the ending was abrupt and was lacking some oomph that for all it’s faults that I had with “The Hollow Hills” at least delivered on by having Arthur crowned king. Maybe Stewart should have just ended the book with the end of Camelot instead of trying to stretch that out into a fourth book.
May 18, 2023
I have to disagree with reviews that criticize the absence of battle scenes, as I think they miss the point. This is not a series that's particularly interested in the great doings of Arthur and his knights. It is interested in depicting the way people relate to each other within a framework set by prophecy.
The first three stories in this series are told from Merlin's perspective. Although Merlin cares about the outcome of the battles, his powers let him know that they will turn out alright. He's also not worried about Arthur surviving them because he knows that Arthur won't die from those battles. The danger to Arthur resides in the child Arthur fathered with his then-unknown half-sister, Morgause. Thus, Merlin's chief concern in this book is to find out everything he can about the child's fate, and to protect Arthur as best he can.
This book is not Arthur-centric in the sense that the narrator follows all of Arthur's achievements. It is Arthur-centric in the sense that everything Merlin does is prompted by his desire to protect Arthur and aid him. And for me, the greatest beauty of this series is the Merlin-Arthur relationship; the love and respect they feel for each other. There is no question that Arthur is the central figure in Merlin's life, but I believe that Merlin is the central figure in Arthur's, too. Arthur knows that Merlin is the one person upon whom he can absolutely rely, the one person who will never betray him. It makes Merlin's end more poignant, because we understand what Arthur is losing.
The first three stories in this series are told from Merlin's perspective. Although Merlin cares about the outcome of the battles, his powers let him know that they will turn out alright. He's also not worried about Arthur surviving them because he knows that Arthur won't die from those battles. The danger to Arthur resides in the child Arthur fathered with his then-unknown half-sister, Morgause. Thus, Merlin's chief concern in this book is to find out everything he can about the child's fate, and to protect Arthur as best he can.
This book is not Arthur-centric in the sense that the narrator follows all of Arthur's achievements. It is Arthur-centric in the sense that everything Merlin does is prompted by his desire to protect Arthur and aid him. And for me, the greatest beauty of this series is the Merlin-Arthur relationship; the love and respect they feel for each other. There is no question that Arthur is the central figure in Merlin's life, but I believe that Merlin is the central figure in Arthur's, too. Arthur knows that Merlin is the one person upon whom he can absolutely rely, the one person who will never betray him. It makes Merlin's end more poignant, because we understand what Arthur is losing.
April 17, 2021
"Clare quería saber los nombres de las estrellas; Kathleen estaba decidida a alcanzarlas a la larga".
Soy tan fan de la forma de narrar y meternos en la historia de Sarah Lark que devoro cualquier libro suyo que llega a mis manos.
En este caso, volvemos a viajar a Nueva Zelanda de mano, una vez más, de unas protagonistas fuertes, valientes y con carácter. La autora nos describe tan maravillosamente bien el entorno, los paisajes, las cosas más cotidianas y el día a día de nuestros protagonistas que lo convierte todo en unos personajes más completamente necesarios para el desarrollo de la novela y adictivos.
He de decir que aquí he tenido algún que otro problema con Michael, nuestro prota masculino, porque ha habido muchos momentos en que no lo he entendido y me parecido egoísta en la mayor parte del desarrollo de la historia, pero también entiendo que este egoísmo de Michael es necesario muchas veces y que va metido en su ADN y en eso la autora lo borda también.
He adorado a Kathleen sí, pero me he enamorado por completo del personaje de Lizzie, para mí la auténtica protagonista de esta historia.
Es maravilloso como las protas femeninas que nos presenta la autora van creciendo a lo largo de la novela y como se convierten en mujeres fuertes, libres y completamente independientes.
Otra maravilla más de Sarah Lark. Deseando ponerme con el siguiente.
Soy tan fan de la forma de narrar y meternos en la historia de Sarah Lark que devoro cualquier libro suyo que llega a mis manos.
En este caso, volvemos a viajar a Nueva Zelanda de mano, una vez más, de unas protagonistas fuertes, valientes y con carácter. La autora nos describe tan maravillosamente bien el entorno, los paisajes, las cosas más cotidianas y el día a día de nuestros protagonistas que lo convierte todo en unos personajes más completamente necesarios para el desarrollo de la novela y adictivos.
He de decir que aquí he tenido algún que otro problema con Michael, nuestro prota masculino, porque ha habido muchos momentos en que no lo he entendido y me parecido egoísta en la mayor parte del desarrollo de la historia, pero también entiendo que este egoísmo de Michael es necesario muchas veces y que va metido en su ADN y en eso la autora lo borda también.
He adorado a Kathleen sí, pero me he enamorado por completo del personaje de Lizzie, para mí la auténtica protagonista de esta historia.
Es maravilloso como las protas femeninas que nos presenta la autora van creciendo a lo largo de la novela y como se convierten en mujeres fuertes, libres y completamente independientes.
Otra maravilla más de Sarah Lark. Deseando ponerme con el siguiente.
January 7, 2017
So much for this binge; now I'll have to settle down and catch up on required reading. But it's been lovely. This, like vols. 1 and 2, is a very satisfying retelling of the story of Arthur from Merlin's point of view. Such a nice rereading to start the year! Even if you've read the series, do listen to the audio. Story and narrator combine for a fabulous experience.
September 5, 2021
Merlin's Elder Years as King Arthur's Advisor, the Rise of Morgause, and His Time with the Lady of the Lake
Mary Stewart once again does a masterful job retelling the Matter of Britain and Arthurian Legend in her own reinterpretation of events, explaining many of the more fanciful legends of magic and enchantment in a more realistic way, as they are always embellished by the common and superstitious people of the times.
We see Merlin advice King Arthur on uniting Great Britain, tangling with Morgause in her various deadly ploys as the wife of King Lot, enemy of Arthur, and later Queen of Orkney, where she raises 4 fiery young red-headed boys: Gawain, Agravaine, Gareth, and Gaheris, along with one dark-haired, slender boy named Mordred.
Merlin also encounters a young woman he mistakes for a boy at first, named Niniane (aka Nimue, Viviane, etc in the many version of the Lady of the Lake legend), who was raised next to the lake at Avalon, and who forms a romantic relationship with Merlin as she also learns all his arcane knowledge and thus receives (steals?) his magic over time, eventually leaving him spent.
Mary Stewart once again does a masterful job retelling the Matter of Britain and Arthurian Legend in her own reinterpretation of events, explaining many of the more fanciful legends of magic and enchantment in a more realistic way, as they are always embellished by the common and superstitious people of the times.
We see Merlin advice King Arthur on uniting Great Britain, tangling with Morgause in her various deadly ploys as the wife of King Lot, enemy of Arthur, and later Queen of Orkney, where she raises 4 fiery young red-headed boys: Gawain, Agravaine, Gareth, and Gaheris, along with one dark-haired, slender boy named Mordred.
Merlin also encounters a young woman he mistakes for a boy at first, named Niniane (aka Nimue, Viviane, etc in the many version of the Lady of the Lake legend), who was raised next to the lake at Avalon, and who forms a romantic relationship with Merlin as she also learns all his arcane knowledge and thus receives (steals?) his magic over time, eventually leaving him spent.
August 10, 2012
The Last Enchantment covers the first decade or so of Arthur’s reign. While I found myself enjoying it more than The Hollow Hills, it suffered from the same flaws I found in that book – namely, the second-hand nature of much of the narrative. Nearly everything is related to Merlin by a third party with the exception of Melwas’ abduction of Guinevere and Merlin’s tutelage of Nimuë, whom he believes is a boy in the beginning. Yet even in the latter episode, Merlin spends much of the time in a dreamlike trance, then falls into a coma and is buried alive in his hermitage at Bryn Myrddin; and, in the former, he’s the rower who takes Bedwyr to where Guinevere is held, he doesn't do anything.
I can’t blame Stewart entirely for this. In the Arthurian romances and in many modern interpretations, Merlin is not the focus (if he’s incorporated into the tale at all). Traditionally, he’s the power behind the throne, the advisor to the crown, the uneasily tolerated enchanter of an ostensibly Christian king, and it’s hard to make him the center of any tale. Thus, in this series, most of the great tales of Arthur’s court are narrated after-the-fact by couriers and visitors to wherever Merlin is: The 12 battles that secure Arthur’s kingdom, the massacre of the innocents when Mordred is born, Guinevere and Bedwyr’s adultery, Accolon and Morgan’s plot to murder the king, etc.
Reflecting on my comments in my review of The Hollow Hills, I had decided I was unfair in criticizing Stewart for her depiction of women. It was told from the POV of a man of 6th century AD Britain, a period not noted as a highpoint in feminine empowerment. The author was reflecting the reality of the times – women were seen as irrelevant except in their capacity to breed boys. Yet I was again astonished at the level of misogyny in The Last Enchantment, and I’m leaning back toward my original assessment. All of Arthur’s serious problems stem from the machinations of women – or they do in Merlin’s eyes – primarily his sisters, Morgause and Morgan, both of whom are "corrupted" by their flirtations with witchcraft (a suspect manifestation of the Power that acts legitimately through Merlin). Alternatively, women are silly creatures who let themselves be swayed by emotions (like compassion or fear), e.g., Guinevere. And then there’s Nimuë. In The Hollow Hills review, I suggested that Merlin is a supremely unreliable narrator, and I raise it again based on the wizard’s account of his affair with the Lady of the Lake. It’s too fairy-tale like and sentimental to ring true, and one can only wonder how delusional Merlin is when he so calmly accepts Nimuë’s explanation of his interment:
Contrary to what one might think given all these negative things I’ve had to say about the series, it is reasonably engaging, and Stewart is a fine writer. My disappointment arises because I think she could have pushed the envelop a bit more in developing more interesting characters or letting Merlin be more engaged in the events he narrates.
It’s on now to the final book – The Wicked Day – which is told from Mordred’s point of view, and I’ve always been sympathetic to him (e.g., “Chichevache”).
I can’t blame Stewart entirely for this. In the Arthurian romances and in many modern interpretations, Merlin is not the focus (if he’s incorporated into the tale at all). Traditionally, he’s the power behind the throne, the advisor to the crown, the uneasily tolerated enchanter of an ostensibly Christian king, and it’s hard to make him the center of any tale. Thus, in this series, most of the great tales of Arthur’s court are narrated after-the-fact by couriers and visitors to wherever Merlin is: The 12 battles that secure Arthur’s kingdom, the massacre of the innocents when Mordred is born, Guinevere and Bedwyr’s adultery, Accolon and Morgan’s plot to murder the king, etc.
Reflecting on my comments in my review of The Hollow Hills, I had decided I was unfair in criticizing Stewart for her depiction of women. It was told from the POV of a man of 6th century AD Britain, a period not noted as a highpoint in feminine empowerment. The author was reflecting the reality of the times – women were seen as irrelevant except in their capacity to breed boys. Yet I was again astonished at the level of misogyny in The Last Enchantment, and I’m leaning back toward my original assessment. All of Arthur’s serious problems stem from the machinations of women – or they do in Merlin’s eyes – primarily his sisters, Morgause and Morgan, both of whom are "corrupted" by their flirtations with witchcraft (a suspect manifestation of the Power that acts legitimately through Merlin). Alternatively, women are silly creatures who let themselves be swayed by emotions (like compassion or fear), e.g., Guinevere. And then there’s Nimuë. In The Hollow Hills review, I suggested that Merlin is a supremely unreliable narrator, and I raise it again based on the wizard’s account of his affair with the Lady of the Lake. It’s too fairy-tale like and sentimental to ring true, and one can only wonder how delusional Merlin is when he so calmly accepts Nimuë’s explanation of his interment:
She lifted her head. Her face was tragic. "Yes, and how you gave it! I only pray that you cannot remember! You had told me to learn all that you had to tell me. You had said that I must build on every detail of your life; that after your death I must be Merlin.... And you were leaving me, slipping from me in sleep ... I had to do it, hadn’t I? Force the last of your power from you, even though with it I took the last of your strength? I did it by every means I knew – cajoled, stormed, threatened, gave you cordials and brought you back to answer me again and again – when what I should have done, had you been any other man, was to let you sleep, and go in peace. And because you were Merlin, and no other man, you roused yourself in pain and answered me, and gave me all you had. So minute by minute I weakened you, when it seems to me now that I might have saved you." She slid her hands up to my breast, and lifted swimming grey eyes. "Will you tell me something truthfully? Swear by the god?"
"What is it?"
"Do you remember it, when I hung about you and tormented you to your death, like a spider sucking the life from a honey-bee?"
I put my hands up to cover hers. I looked straight into the beautiful eyes, and lied. "My darling girl, I remember nothing of that time but words of love, and God taking me peacefully into his hand. I will swear it if you like."
Relief swept into her face. But still she shook her head, refusing to be comforted. "But then, even all the power and knowledge you gave me could not show me that we had buried you living, and send me back to get you out. Merlin, I should have known, I should have known! I dreamed again and again, but the dreams were full of confusion. I went back once to Bryn Myrddin, did you know? I went to the cave, but the door was blocked still, and I called and called, but there was no sound –"
"Hush, hush." She was shivering. I pulled her closer, and bent my head and kissed her hair. "It’s over. I am here. When you came back for me, I must have been drugged asleep. Nimuë, what happened was the will of the god. If he had wanted to save me from the tomb, he would have spoken to you. Now, he has brought me back in his own time, and for that, he saved me from being put quick into the ground, or given to the flames. You must accept it all, and thank him, as I do." (pp. 490-92)
Contrary to what one might think given all these negative things I’ve had to say about the series, it is reasonably engaging, and Stewart is a fine writer. My disappointment arises because I think she could have pushed the envelop a bit more in developing more interesting characters or letting Merlin be more engaged in the events he narrates.
It’s on now to the final book – The Wicked Day – which is told from Mordred’s point of view, and I’ve always been sympathetic to him (e.g., “Chichevache”).
August 13, 2023
I love Mary Stewart’s gift for bringing a scene to life in the mind’s eye and this book offers many pleasures of that sort, but as far as story goes, it is a little disappointing. It feels like an antechamber to another book rather than a self-contained whole. Basically, the book is filling the time between Mordred’s birth and his adulthood.
In this third volume in the Merlin series (I don’t call it the Arthurian Saga because Merlin is the central character, at least for the first three books), King Arthur has taken the throne and is working (mostly offstage) to consolidate control over his kingdom. Merlin, meanwhile, is aging and has lost easy access to his magical powers, such as they were (though one of my knocks against this book is that they tend to reappear whenever the story makes them convenient). There’s a lot about the building of Camelot but we get only rare glimpses of life there among the Knights. We get some suspense involving Guinevere and Nimuë, a lot of it vaguely sexist, but a great deal of the book is taken up with Merlin’s aging and his frailties. There’s also quite a bit of—dare I say it of Queen Mary Stewart?—heavy-handed doom-warning. It seems there can’t be a joyous scene without some admonition that peace and happiness can’t last.
I did enjoy this book more than I have in the past, perhaps because I can relate more to the aging angst, but the first two books in the series remain my favorites.
In this third volume in the Merlin series (I don’t call it the Arthurian Saga because Merlin is the central character, at least for the first three books), King Arthur has taken the throne and is working (mostly offstage) to consolidate control over his kingdom. Merlin, meanwhile, is aging and has lost easy access to his magical powers, such as they were (though one of my knocks against this book is that they tend to reappear whenever the story makes them convenient). There’s a lot about the building of Camelot but we get only rare glimpses of life there among the Knights. We get some suspense involving Guinevere and Nimuë, a lot of it vaguely sexist, but a great deal of the book is taken up with Merlin’s aging and his frailties. There’s also quite a bit of—dare I say it of Queen Mary Stewart?—heavy-handed doom-warning. It seems there can’t be a joyous scene without some admonition that peace and happiness can’t last.
I did enjoy this book more than I have in the past, perhaps because I can relate more to the aging angst, but the first two books in the series remain my favorites.
January 1, 2022
Loved every bit of it! Mary Stewart keeps me on the edge of my chair. I cannot believe no one ever told me about her sooner and so many people I know have never heard of her either, including my fantasy-loving sister and brother-in-law.
Ms. Stewart is a marvelous story-teller. If I had nothing else to do, I would it sit down and read all her books. There are many others besides those in the Arthurian series, but at the moment I am only interested in that particular legend so I will probably read myself out on that for now before I return to her other books.
Most highly recommended! On to The Wicked Day, # 4 in the series.
Ms. Stewart is a marvelous story-teller. If I had nothing else to do, I would it sit down and read all her books. There are many others besides those in the Arthurian series, but at the moment I am only interested in that particular legend so I will probably read myself out on that for now before I return to her other books.
Most highly recommended! On to The Wicked Day, # 4 in the series.
September 26, 2010
This third book of Mary Stewart's "Merlin Trilogy", The Last Enchantment has proven to be my favorite of the set. I tend to judge the books I read by the style of book it is and how well it meets my expectations for the genre. For example, a really good adventure/thriller novel makes me want to keep reading faster and faster to get to the, hopefully, satisfying conclusion. A good mystery may make me read a bit slower to make sure I'm not missing some vital clue along the way. The Last Enchantment was one of those fantasy novels that made me want to really take my time, just to savor the story itself, relishing not only in the classic Arthurian mythos that I love but also in the writing style of Mary Stewart. And I did take my time, nearly a whole week for just one novel!
I enjoyed the first two books in this trilogy quite a bit but this one was one notch better still. Both of the preceding novels were fine on their own but, I think, served largely to set the stage for this third volume. We start with Arthur just having been proclaimed King after Uther's death, and get to watch him through Merlin's eyes as he grows into his role. All of the pageantry of the Arthurian legends comes to the fold here but not always as we are used to seeing it. The author's note at the end explains how she used many historical texts as well as the original Arthurian works by Mallory (Morte d'Arthur) to keep to the more authentic legend. Merlin, of course, takes center stage in these novels, telling the story from his first person POV. Ms Stewart does a masterful job of keeping him honest, showing his foibles along with his genius. Not much in the way of description of battles is to be found here; Arthur is often away leading one battle or another but that is all done off stage. Rather the book concentrates more on the relationships of those around Merlin himself such as Nimue, his student/lover/wife and ultimate successor. Other prominent characters such as Morgan, Morgause, Lot, Bedwyn and a host of allied kings and queens all make their appearance.
This trilogy is among the best fantasy I've read and will take an honored place on my shelves.
I enjoyed the first two books in this trilogy quite a bit but this one was one notch better still. Both of the preceding novels were fine on their own but, I think, served largely to set the stage for this third volume. We start with Arthur just having been proclaimed King after Uther's death, and get to watch him through Merlin's eyes as he grows into his role. All of the pageantry of the Arthurian legends comes to the fold here but not always as we are used to seeing it. The author's note at the end explains how she used many historical texts as well as the original Arthurian works by Mallory (Morte d'Arthur) to keep to the more authentic legend. Merlin, of course, takes center stage in these novels, telling the story from his first person POV. Ms Stewart does a masterful job of keeping him honest, showing his foibles along with his genius. Not much in the way of description of battles is to be found here; Arthur is often away leading one battle or another but that is all done off stage. Rather the book concentrates more on the relationships of those around Merlin himself such as Nimue, his student/lover/wife and ultimate successor. Other prominent characters such as Morgan, Morgause, Lot, Bedwyn and a host of allied kings and queens all make their appearance.
This trilogy is among the best fantasy I've read and will take an honored place on my shelves.
April 17, 2018
For me this was 3.5 stars rounded up for the beautiful imagery and ponderous beauty of Merlin's thoughts and "hibernation" period quite after Arthur's reign has started. It covers numerous events in the Arthurian saga from "outside" Merlin eyes- which is often for/from great distances and context misty. And also it follows Merlin's teaching and mentoring the next "seer" and enchantress.
It was enthralling in parts and also an extremely, for me it was, a difficult read. Because there is so much travel and with Camelot, the building of that core placement along with Merlin's Applegate- so much detail. And also at several levels dozens of moving under characters and always colored within natural and poetic language embedding.
It also covers the outcomes and the progressions of Morgan, Morgause, Mordred and the love affair of Arthur's own Queen. This is a decade or more of historic battles and defense/ uniting of Britain as a unit too against the Saxon invasions. Cador's death and all of the Cornwall faction particulars also within this period nearing the ending of Merlin's "after arising again" period.
For some reason, I grasped Merlin as a mind and spirit of power use far more in his youth. Lots of the other events that were of such core importance to a central British identity were lost more in this book than in the first two in the series. As Merlin relinquishes more and more of his control and power hierarchies and abilities "owned"- I just feel he is less and less Merlin. The aging in the way he does it, for me it seems sad. Arthur is THE KING and holds that ability of practical applications controls over all other human parlance in his life. Wisdom!
It was enthralling in parts and also an extremely, for me it was, a difficult read. Because there is so much travel and with Camelot, the building of that core placement along with Merlin's Applegate- so much detail. And also at several levels dozens of moving under characters and always colored within natural and poetic language embedding.
It also covers the outcomes and the progressions of Morgan, Morgause, Mordred and the love affair of Arthur's own Queen. This is a decade or more of historic battles and defense/ uniting of Britain as a unit too against the Saxon invasions. Cador's death and all of the Cornwall faction particulars also within this period nearing the ending of Merlin's "after arising again" period.
For some reason, I grasped Merlin as a mind and spirit of power use far more in his youth. Lots of the other events that were of such core importance to a central British identity were lost more in this book than in the first two in the series. As Merlin relinquishes more and more of his control and power hierarchies and abilities "owned"- I just feel he is less and less Merlin. The aging in the way he does it, for me it seems sad. Arthur is THE KING and holds that ability of practical applications controls over all other human parlance in his life. Wisdom!
July 1, 2018
Algo que me gustó mucho fue la manera de escribir de la autora. Como no he leído nada anteriormente de ella, la verdad no sé si ésta es su manera acostumbrada de escribir o lo ha hecho en consecuencia de lo que estaba relatando. Esto lo digo ya que el narrador tiene un tono muy elevado, en el que se plantean las situaciones de una manera tal que no se pierde lo sublime. A pesar de que lo narrado sea del orden de lo grotesco, o escenas con violencia, la forma de narrar no pierde el tono en ningún momento. Además, los personajes se dirigen a sí mismos de una manera bastante verosímil en cuanto a la época, lo que me ha encantado. Esto lo quería mencionar porque suele molestarme un poco en cuanto los personajes tienen una manera de hablar anacrónica que termina por romperme la ilusión de verosimilitud que aquí en este libro sí se ve logrado y no se rompe.
October 23, 2014
I don't think this is the correct edition. Mine isn't abridged, but I didn't see the correct one. I think the reader is correct & very good. An excellent end to the trilogy. I know Stewart added another book years later & while I have read it once, I don't really want to listen to it. This is plenty.
May 23, 2021
Once again Mary Stewart has left me breathless and wanting more.
The third book in Stewarts Arthurian legend takes us through the early years of Arthur's reign. I love this author's prose and writing style, and I love the tale she weaves. Her story is a slightly different version than the norm and truthfully, I will never be able to read another author's version without comparing. So I figure I won't.
Her characters are perfect and flawed, which is what makes it all seem so real. Her research into the legend and the actual life of Arthur and his court delves deep. She takes the time at the end of the book to explain how and why she told her story. There were many historical documents made available to her and she says If I had known how much there was to read I would never had dared to start to write it all.
I am glad she dared and I am glad to have read her work.
The third book in Stewarts Arthurian legend takes us through the early years of Arthur's reign. I love this author's prose and writing style, and I love the tale she weaves. Her story is a slightly different version than the norm and truthfully, I will never be able to read another author's version without comparing. So I figure I won't.
Her characters are perfect and flawed, which is what makes it all seem so real. Her research into the legend and the actual life of Arthur and his court delves deep. She takes the time at the end of the book to explain how and why she told her story. There were many historical documents made available to her and she says If I had known how much there was to read I would never had dared to start to write it all.
I am glad she dared and I am glad to have read her work.
April 18, 2022
Last time I read this on my own. This time I listened to it with dh. Which is better? Each had its place but I really think to fully appreciate the story, you need both and/or you will need to read it more than once, even more than twice. I fully intend to go back after some time has passed. Camelot is a magical place.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 584 reviews