What do you think?
Rate this book
Cosmology Without God?: The Problematic Theology Inherent in Modern Cosmology
Is God a superfluous hypothesis for modern cosmology? According to the normal understanding of modern science, the answer should be affirmative because modern science is supposed to be free of metaphysical and theological presuppositions. However, despite its self-proclaimed neutrality regarding metaphysics and theology, modern science is full of metaphysical and theological presuppositions. These can be summarized as a mechanistic understanding of nature, a reduction of God to an external agent in competition with natural processes, and creation to a worldly mechanism. These presuppositions are deficient and untenable, and they remain unconscious for the most part in the dialogue between science and theology, making it intellectually impossible because of the reduced notions of God, nature, and creation assumed. Using the coherent and unreduced image of God and nature provided by the Christian doctrine of creation ex nihilo, Fr. David Alcalde intends to uncover and criticize the incoherent theological assumptions inherent in a concrete branch of modern science, which is modern cosmology. The author points out the presence of these inadequate theological presuppositions in both the theologians who use modern cosmology to offer scientific proof for the existence of God and the atheistic cosmologists who use their science to reject the idea of God.
"The assumption persists that modern science is free of metaphysical and theological presuppositions, and therefore neutral in their regard. Appealing to the image of God and nature found in the Christian doctrine of creation, Fr. David Alcalde, trained as both a theologian and an astrophysicist, examines this assumption from both 'sides'--and clearly exposes its problematic character."
--David L. Schindler, Pontifical John Paul II Institute, Washington, DC
"For anyone interested in the relationship between science and theology, this work is indispensable. In language that is mercifully free of academic jargon and scientific technicalities, the author unveils the non-neutrality of modern science… As a humanities type whose scientific education stopped in secondary school I found the argumentation of this work easy to follow. It will be of great value to scientists, theologians, and thoughtful Christians in general."
--Professor Tracey Rowland, University of Notre Dame (Australia)
"David Alcalde's book stands amongst a growing body of writings which begin not with the mesmerizing discoveries of science, but with the foundational theological and metaphysical presuppositions of science… Alcade is a scientist, theologian and philosopher who calls for better science built on firmer metaphysical and theological foundations."
--Simon Oliver, Durham University
"One reason theologians and scientists so regularly speak past each other is that scientists tend to be unaware of the significant theological and metaphysical assumptions built into their thinking and practice, and theologians tend to have too little 'expertise' in science to be able to show them how and why they do. Fr. Alcade is the rare person who overcomes both deficiencies, and his book promises therefore to help this discussion finally bear genuine fruit.
--David C. Schindler, Pontifical John Paul II Institute (Washington, DC)
Fr. David Alcalde is a professor at both the Instituto de Filosofia Edith Stein and the Instituto de Teologia Lumen Gentium, located in Granada (Spain). He has PhDs in both astrophysics and theology.
"The assumption persists that modern science is free of metaphysical and theological presuppositions, and therefore neutral in their regard. Appealing to the image of God and nature found in the Christian doctrine of creation, Fr. David Alcalde, trained as both a theologian and an astrophysicist, examines this assumption from both 'sides'--and clearly exposes its problematic character."
--David L. Schindler, Pontifical John Paul II Institute, Washington, DC
"For anyone interested in the relationship between science and theology, this work is indispensable. In language that is mercifully free of academic jargon and scientific technicalities, the author unveils the non-neutrality of modern science… As a humanities type whose scientific education stopped in secondary school I found the argumentation of this work easy to follow. It will be of great value to scientists, theologians, and thoughtful Christians in general."
--Professor Tracey Rowland, University of Notre Dame (Australia)
"David Alcalde's book stands amongst a growing body of writings which begin not with the mesmerizing discoveries of science, but with the foundational theological and metaphysical presuppositions of science… Alcade is a scientist, theologian and philosopher who calls for better science built on firmer metaphysical and theological foundations."
--Simon Oliver, Durham University
"One reason theologians and scientists so regularly speak past each other is that scientists tend to be unaware of the significant theological and metaphysical assumptions built into their thinking and practice, and theologians tend to have too little 'expertise' in science to be able to show them how and why they do. Fr. Alcade is the rare person who overcomes both deficiencies, and his book promises therefore to help this discussion finally bear genuine fruit.
--David C. Schindler, Pontifical John Paul II Institute (Washington, DC)
Fr. David Alcalde is a professor at both the Instituto de Filosofia Edith Stein and the Instituto de Teologia Lumen Gentium, located in Granada (Spain). He has PhDs in both astrophysics and theology.
301 pages, Kindle Edition
Published September 2, 2019
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
December 16, 2021
Great book
“Because of their positivism, the proponents of a multiverse cannot think about God as ipsum esse subsistens. He becomes “a finite object juxtaposed to and in competition with the world.”828 This extrinsic image of God is inherently related to the image of the universe as a collection of unrelated pieces put together. Once God ceases to be the fullness of being, becoming a mere external designer, the universe loses its inner unity, and it becomes an artificial aggregate. Even more, creation has nothing to do with the transition from non-being to being, or the ontological structure of the world, and becomes mere design. Ultimately, the image of god rejected by the adherents of the multiverse theory is the same one accepted by the defenders of the design argument based on anthropic coincidences. This is not a coincidence, but the consequence of both having the same theological and ontological presuppositions.”
“Because of their positivism, the proponents of a multiverse cannot think about God as ipsum esse subsistens. He becomes “a finite object juxtaposed to and in competition with the world.”828 This extrinsic image of God is inherently related to the image of the universe as a collection of unrelated pieces put together. Once God ceases to be the fullness of being, becoming a mere external designer, the universe loses its inner unity, and it becomes an artificial aggregate. Even more, creation has nothing to do with the transition from non-being to being, or the ontological structure of the world, and becomes mere design. Ultimately, the image of god rejected by the adherents of the multiverse theory is the same one accepted by the defenders of the design argument based on anthropic coincidences. This is not a coincidence, but the consequence of both having the same theological and ontological presuppositions.”
Displaying 1 of 1 review