What do you think?
Rate this book
339 pages, ebook
First published June 1, 2021
From the moment I left the White House, I was often told by others with ambitions for future government service that I should be less angry, more circumspect in my comments. To assume a public role as an angry person was, in American politics, to define yourself as a less serious person, an identity that has become more dangerous for a Democrat to assume than a Republican: a partisan. To attack prominent people, even Republicans who had more than earned the attacks, was to deal yourself out of future positions that require the confirmation votes of Senate Republicans or the acceptance of a Washington society that wants people to pretend to like each other, even--perhaps especially--when they don't. But I kept returning to rage, for reasons that I didn't really consider.
I asked Maria [Stepanova, Russian writer / journalist] how she felt things had changed since the 1990s, that time of humiliation and hopefulness. "The nineties were about the future," she said. "Now everything is about the past. But not the actual, historical past." Instead, she said, leaders like Putin, Orban [in Hungary] and Trump invented a past to suit their needs. "There is an enchantment and obsession with the past, but it is a fictional reality that doesn't have anything real."
Think of American capitalism and culture devoid of liberal values and democratic policies, and you'll get something approximating the Chinese Communist Party.