Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Story of Civilization #8

The Age of Louis XIV

Rate this book
In the eighth volume of their Story of Civilization, the Durants explore the apex of European civilization to that time, the years 1648 to 1715. It is the era of the "Sun King," Louis XIV, one of the most powerful rulers in Western history. It is also the pinnacle of Dutch culture, the heyday of Vermeer and William of Orange, later King of England. All this forms the backdrop for the Durants' real focus: the intellectual character of the age. Encompassing Newton and Leibniz, among others, THE AGE OF LOUIS XIV marks a momentous transition: the passage from superstition and intolerance to science and philosophy. This is the period on which the foundation for modernity rests.

"Informed and highly readable ... eloquently partisan for the dignity of man and the decencies of life." (Saturday Review)

802 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1963

Loading interface...
Loading interface...

About the author

Will Durant

729 books2,812 followers
William James Durant was a prolific American writer, historian, and philosopher. He is best known for the 11-volume The Story of Civilization, written in collaboration with his wife Ariel and published between 1935 and 1975. He was earlier noted for his book, The Story of Philosophy, written in 1926, which was considered "a groundbreaking work that helped to popularize philosophy."

They were awarded the Pulitzer Prize for literature in 1967 and the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1977.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
436 (49%)
4 stars
309 (34%)
3 stars
118 (13%)
2 stars
19 (2%)
1 star
3 (<1%)
Displaying 1 - 30 of 72 reviews
Profile Image for Ahmad Sharabiani.
9,563 reviews381 followers
February 27, 2022
The Age of Louis XIV (Story of Civilization 8), Will Durant

VIII. The Age of Louis XIV (1963): This volume covers the period of Louis XIV of France in Europe and the Near East.

1. The French Zenith: 1643–1715
The Sun Rises: 1643–84
The Crucible of Faith: 1643–1715
The King and the Arts: 1643–1715
Molière: 1622–73
The Classic Zenith in French Literature: 1643–1715
Tragedy in the Netherlands: 1649–1715
“It was an age of strict manners and loose morals.” (p. 27)
”Like the others, he came from the middle class; the aristocracy is too interested in the art of
life to spare time for the life of art.” (p. 144)
2. England: 1649–1714
Cromwell: 1649–60
Milton: 1608–74
The Restoration: 1660–85
The Glorious Revolution: 1685–1714
From Dryden to Swift: 1660–1714
3. The Periphery: 1648–1715
The Struggle for the Baltic: 1648–1721
Peter the Great: 1698–1725
The Changing Empire: 1648–1715
The Fallow South: 1648–1715
The Jewish Enclaves: 1564–1715
4. The Intellectual Adventure: 1648–1715
From Superstition to Scholarship: 1648–1715
The Scientific Quest: 1648–1715
Isaac Newton: 1642–1727
English Philosophy: 1648–1715
Faith and Reason in France: 1648–1715
Spinoza: 1632–77
Leibniz: 1646–1716
5. France Against Europe: 1683–1715
The Sun Sets

تاریخ نخستین خوانش: سال1995میلادی

عنوان: عصر لویی چهاردهم - جلد هشتم؛ نویسنده: ویل دورانت؛ مترجمها: کتاب اول: پرویز مرزبان؛ کتاب دوم: ابوطالب صارمی؛ کتابهای سوم تا پنجم: عبدالحسین شریفیان؛ ویراستاران: پرویز مرزبان؛ ابوطالب صارمی؛ سعید حمیدیان؛ سرویراستار: محمود مصاحب؛ تهران، شرکت انتشارات علمی فرهنگی؛ چاپ نخست سال1368؛ چاپ چهارم سال1374؛ در1021ص؛ موضوع: تاریخ تمدن از نویسنگان ایالات متحده آمریکا - سده20م

فهرست: کتاب اوّل: «اعتلای فرانسه از سال1643میلادی تا سال1715میلادی، از ص3، تا ص228»؛ کتاب دوّم: «انگلستان از سال1649میلادی تا سال1714میلادی، از ص229، تا ص432»؛ کتاب سوّم: «پیرامون از سال1648میلادی تا سال1715میلادی، از ص433، تا ص560»؛ کتاب چهارم: «بلندپروازی‌هایی در عرصۀ اندیشه از سال1648میلادی تا سال1715میلادی، از ص561؛ تا ص776»؛ کتاب پنجم: «فرانسه دربرابر اروپا از سال1683میلادی تا سال1715میلادی؛ از ص777، تا ص816»؛ «ضمائم از ص817، تا ص1021»؛

تاریخ بهنگام رسانی 15/12/1399هجری خورشیدی؛ 07/12/1400هجری خورشیدی؛ ا. شربیانی
Profile Image for Roy Lotz.
Author 1 book8,689 followers
July 16, 2017
The Writing of Will Durant

This volume of Durant’s Story of Civilization covers one of my favorite periods in history. Here we encounter John Milton, my favorite poet, blindly singing his way from hell to heaven, and Baruch Spinoza, my favorite philosopher, grinding lenses to see things under the aspect of eternity. We also see Pascal wagering his soul, Newton measuring light and calculating gravity, Leibniz postulating monads in the best of all possible worlds, Hobbes painting a nasty and brutish portrait of the state of nature, Locke telling us how comes the mind to be furnished with ideas, and Berkley explaining that the world is just a perception in the mind of God, despite the evidence of Samuel Johnson's stubbed toe.

In this review, however, I want to do something besides evaluate this volume. Instead, I want to talk about Will Durant’s prose.

The most impressive thing about Durant is not his thinking, but his writing. For me, he is a writer of rare caliber, capable of being clear, charming, and graceful through thousands of pages. In many ways, Durant epitomized the pedagogical approach William Zinsser suggests in his book, Writing to Learn. Through his writing, Durant explored nearly every subject and epoch. He wrote his way through metaphysics and mercantilism, through paintings and plagues, through English law and ancient engineering. So, without further preface, here is a sampling of Durant's prose. And mind you that these excerpts are not atypical, but representative of his whole work.


Durant on Religion. He is giving an overview of the Catholic Church; from The Reformation (Volume VI):
Through a formative millennium, from Constantine to Dante, the Christian Church offered the gifts of religion to men and states. It molded the figure of Jesus into a divine embodiment of virtues by which rough barbarians might be shamed into civilization. It formulated a creed that made every man’s life a part, however modest, of a sublime cosmic drama; it bound each individual in a momentous relation with a God Who had created him, Who had spoken to him in sacred Scripture, Who had descended from heaven to suffer ignominy and death in atonement for the sins of humanity, and Who had founded the church as the repository of His teaching and the earthly agents of His power. Year by year the magnificent drama grew; saints and martyrs died for the creed, and bequeathed their example and their merits to the faithful. A hundred forms—a hundred thousand works—of art interpreted the drama and made it vivid even for letterless minds.


Durant on Home Life. He is painting a portrait of the home in medieval Europe; from The Age of Faith (Volume IV):
There was not much comfort in the medieval home. Windows were few, and seldom glassed; wooden shutters closed them against glare or cold. Heating was by one or more fireplaces; drafts came in from a hundred cracks in the walls, and made high-backed chairs a boon. In winter it was common to wear warm hats and fur indoors. Furniture was scanty but well made. Chairs were few, and usually had no backs; but sometimes they were elegantly carved, engraved with armorial bearings, and inlaid with precious stones. Most seats were cut into the masonry walls, or built upon chests in alcoves. Carpets were unusual before the thirteenth century. Italy and Spain had them; and when Eleanor of Castile went to England in 1254 as the bride of the future Edward I, her servants covered the floor of her apartment at Westminster with carpets after the Spanish custom—which then spread through England. Ordinary floors were strewn with rushes or straw, making some houses so malodorous that the parish priest refused to visit them.


Durant on Visual Art. He is describing the Sistine Chapel; from The Renaissance (Volume V):
[Michelangelo] divided the convex vault into over a hundred panels by picturing columns and moldings between them; and he enhanced the tridimensional illusion with lusty, youthful figures upholding the cornices or seated on capitals. In the major panels, running along the crest of the ceiling, Angelo painted scenes from Genesis: the initial act of creation separates light from darkness; the sun, moon, and planets come into being at the command of the Creator—a majestic figure stern of face, powerful of body, with beard and robes flying in the air; the Almighty, even finer in form than in the previous panel, extends His right arm to create Adam, while with his left arm He holds a very pretty Angel—this panel is Michelangelo’s pictorial masterpiece; God, now a much older and patriarchal deity, evokes Eve from Adam’s rib; Adam and Eve eat the fruit of the tree, and are expelled from Eden; Noah and his sons prepare a sacrificial offering to God; the flood rises; Noah celebrates with too much wine. All in these panels is Old Testament, all is Hebraic; Michelangelo belongs to the prophets pronouncing doom, not to the evangelists expounding the gospel of love.


Durant on Architecture. He is evaluating the palace of Versailles; from The Age of Louis XIV (Volume VIII):
Architecturally, Versailles is too complex and haphazard to approach perfection. The chapel is brilliant, but such flaunting of decoration hardly accords with the humility of prayer. Parts of the palace are beautiful, and the stairways to the garden are majestic; but the compulsion laid upon the designers to leave the hunting lodge intact, merely adding wings and ornament, injured the appearance of the whole. Sometimes the proliferating pile leaves an impression of cold monotony and labyrinthine repetition—one room after another to the spread of 1,320 frontal feet. The internal arrangement seems to have ignored physiological convenience, and to have presumed upon remarkable retentive power in noble vesicles. Half a dozen rooms had to be traversed to reach the goal of desire; no wonder we hear of stairways and hallways serving in such emergencies.


Durant on Literature. He is discussing Shakespeare’s language; from The Age of Reason Begins (Volume VII):
The language is the richest in all of literature: fifteen thousand words, including the technical terms of heraldry, music, sports, and the professions, the dialect of the shires, the argot of the pavement, and a thousand hurried or lazy inventions—occulted, unkenneled, fumitory, burnet, spurring… He relished words and explored the nooks and crannies of the language; he loved words in general and poured them forth in frolicsome abandon; if he names a flower he must go on to name a dozen—the words themselves are fragrant. He makes simple characters mouth polysyllabic circumlocutions. He plays jolly havoc with the grammar: turns nouns, adjectives, even adverbs into verbs, and verbs, adjectives, even pronouns into nouns; gives a plural verb to a singular subject or a singular verb to a plural subject; but there were as yet no grammars of English usage. Shakespeare wrote in haste, and had no leisure to repent.


Durant on Engineering. He is summarizing the Roman techniques for constructing roads; from Caesar and Christ (Volume III):
The consular roads were among their simpler achievements. They were from sixteen to twenty-four feet wide, but near Rome part of this width was taken up by sidewalks (margines) paved with rectangular stone slabs. They went straight to their goal in brave sacrifice of initial economy to permanent savings; they overleaped countless streams with costly bridges, crossed marshes with long, arched viaducts of brick and stone, climbed up and down steep hills with no use of cut and fill, and crept along mountaintops or high embankments secured by powerful retaining walls. Their pavement varied with locally available material. Usually the bottom layer (pavimentum) was a four- to six-inch bed of sand, or one inch of mortar. Upon this were imposed four strata of masonry: the statumen, a foot deep, consisting of stones bound with cement or clay; the rudens, ten inches of rammed concrete; the nucleus, twelve to eighteen inches of successively laid and rolled layers of concrete; and the summa crusta of silex or lava polygonal slabs, one to three feet in diameter, eight to twelve inches thick. The upper surface of slabs was smoothed, and the joints so well fitted as to be hardly discernible.


Durant on Music. He is explaining the development of musical notation; from The Age of Faith (Volume IV):
We owe to our medieval forebears still another invention that made modern music possible. Tones could now be determined by dots placed on or in between the lines of the staff, but these signs gave no hint as to how long the note was to be held. Some system for measuring and denoting the duration of each note was indispensable to development of contrapuntal music—the simultaneous and harmonious procedure of two or more independent melodies. Perhaps some knowledge had seeped from Spain of Arab treatises by al-Kindi, al-Farabi, Avicenna, and other Moslems who had dealt with measured music or mensural notation. At some time in the eleventh century Franco of Cologne, a priest mathematician, wrote a treatise Ars cantus mesurabilis, in which he gathered up the suggestion of earlier theory and practice, and laid down essentially our present system for indicating the duration of musical notes. A square-headed virga or rod, formerly used as a neume, was chosen to represent a long note; another neume, the punctum or point, was enlarged into a lozenge to represent a short note; these signs were in time altered; tails were added; by trial and error, through a hundred absurdities, our simple mensural notation was evolved.


Durant on War. He is describing the aftermath of the Thirty Years’ War; from The Age of Reason Begins (Volume VII):
The towns suffered only less than the villages. Many of them were reduced to half their former population. Great cities were in ruins—Magdeburg, Heidelberg, Wurzburg, Neustadt, Bayreuth. Industry declined for lack of producers, purchasers, and trade; commerce hid its head; once-wealthy merchants begged and robbed for bread. Communes, declaring themselves bankrupt, repudiated their debts. Financiers were loath to lend, fearing that loans would be gifts. Taxation impoverished everyone but generals, tax collectors, prelates, and kings. The air was poisonous with refuse and offal and carcasses rotting in the streets. Epidemics of typhus, typhoid, dysentery, and scurvy ran through the terrified population and from town to town…

Morals and morale alike collapsed. The fatalism of despair invited the cynicism of brutality. All the ideals of religion and patriotism disappeared after a generation of violence; simple men now fought for food or drink or hate, while their masters mobilized their passions in a competition for taxable lands and political power. Here and there some humane features showed: Jesuits gathering and feeding deserted children; preachers demanding of governments an end to bloodshed and destruction. “God send that there may be an end at last,” wrote a peasant in his daybook. “God send that there be peace again. God in heaven, send us peace.”


Durant on Science. Here he explains the consequences of Newton’s work on light; from The Age of Louis XIV (Volume VIII):
When [Newton] passed a small ray of sunlight through a transparent prism he found that the apparently monochrome light divided into all these colors of the rainbow; that each component color emerged from the prism at its own specific angle or degree of refraction; and that the colors arranged themselves in a row of bands, forming a continuous spectrum, with red at the one end and violet at the other. Later investigators showed that various substances, when made luminous by burning, give different spectra; by comparing these spectra with the one made by a given star, it became possible to analyze in some degree the star’s chemical constituents. Still more delicate observations of a star’s spectrum indicated its approximate motion toward or from earth; and from these calculations the distance of the star was theoretically deduced. Newton’s revelation of the composition of light, and its refraction in the spectrum, has therefore had almost cosmic consequences in astronomy.


Durant on Trade. Here he gives us a picture of Roman trade in the first century; from Caesar and Christ (Volume III):
The improvement of government and transport expanded Mediterranean trade to unprecedented amplitude. At one end of the busy process of exchange were peddlers hawking through the countryside everything from sulphur matches to costly imported silks; wandering auctioneers who served also as town criers and advertised lost goods and runaway slaves; daily markets and periodical fairs; shopkeepers haggling with customers, cheating with false or tipped scales, and keeping a tangential eye for the aedile’s inspectors of weights and measures.


Durant on Philosophy. Here he is summarizing Spinoza’s metaphysics; from The Age of Louis XIV (Volume VIII):
We may conclude that in Spinoza substance means the essential reality underlying all things. This reality is perceived by us in two forms: as extension or matter, and as thought or mind. These two are “attributes” of substance; not as qualities residing in it, but as the same reality perceived externally by our senses as matter, and internally by our consciousness as thought. Spinoza is a complete monist: these two aspects of reality—matter and thought—are not distinct and separate entities, they are two sides, the outside and the inside, of one reality; so are body and mind, so is physiological action and the corresponding mental state.
Profile Image for Julio Pino.
1,170 reviews91 followers
July 19, 2023
"Listening to a speech by Hubert Humphrey is like reading PLAYBOY magazine while your wife flips the pages".---Barry Goldwater
That is the feeling I got reading THE AGE OF LOUIS XIV by the indefatigable team of Will Durant and his wife Ariel. The personalities of the age are here, their figures drawn in full portrait, although not in the nude, but it all goes by so fast---wars, politics scientific discoveries, philosophies, sex life at the court of the Sun King---that very little sticks in the reader's mind, and this volume resembles more an exquisitely written encyclopedia than the sketch of one of the most exciting and influential eras in modern history. I have been a fan of the Durants ever since reading THE AGE OF NAPOLEON in my teens. Will and Ariel announced they would cease the series, originally intended to go up to the Industrial Revolution, with this final book on Napoleon over Europe. Shortly thereafter Will and his former student turned wife Ariel both died, within days of each other. THE AGE OF LOUIS XIV bears much resemblance to this forerunner. Both volumes center on a man both brilliantly creative and cruel who sought, in vain, to restore to France her rightful position as the hegemonic power of Europe, and both ruined their countries, and most of Europe, in the process. One wonders, though, if Louis XIV, in all his 72 years in power, accomplished as much as that genius across the pond, Isaac Newton, who overturned not one continent but a whole universe with his breakthroughs in physics, optics and astronomy. What is the War of the Spanish Succession or, my favorite-named war of all time, the War of the Devolution, Louis' attempt to recover what is now Belgium for France, compared to the Three Laws of Gravity? To his great credit Louis subsidized and protected from Church censorship the two greatest French playwrights of all time, Moliere and Racine. To his shame and eternal damnation, by historians and his countrymen, he revoked the Edict of Nantes, granting French Protestants religious liberty, inflaming pogroms against the Huguenots and setting the stage for future wars of Catholics versus Protestants, with England and the Netherlands for enemies. The Durants do not forget what they term "the periphery of Europe", but Peter the Great earns only a few dozen pages when, in seizing the Baltic states and defeating Sweden in the Northern War while building up industry at home, he set a precedent for Russia that is still timely today. This was the age when land power yielded to sea power as the decisive element in war, science chipped away at organized religion, paving the way for the Enlightenment, and England replaced France as the dominant throne in Europe. The Durants describe all this with zest and even humor, but this volume is a case of too many subjects at one time spoiling the soup.
Profile Image for Jamie Smith.
509 reviews90 followers
August 13, 2022
“We need not desire any better evidence that a man is in the wrong...than to hear him declare against reason, and thereby to acknowledge that reason is against him.”
- John Tillotson, Archbishop of Canterbury (1691)


No one brings history to life like Will Durant, adding context and insight to bare facts. As I have done with the other volumes of his Story of Civilization, I will let him speak for himself:


- [Louis XIV’s] mind was not as good as his manners. He almost matched Napoleon in his penetrating judgment of men, but he fell far short of Caesar’s philosophical intellect, or Augustus’ humane and farseeing statesmanship. “He had nothing more than good sense,” said Sainte-Beuve, “but he had a great deal of it.”
- Until his love of glory ruined his character and his country, he had his share of estimable qualities. His court was impressed by his justice, lenience, generosity, and self-control.
- It was an age of strict manners and loose morals. Dress was the sacrament of status. In the middle classes clothing was almost puritanically simple—a black coat modestly covering shirt and trousers and legs. But in the elite it was magnificent, and more so in men than in women.
- Manners were stately, though under the flourish of the saluting hat and trailing skirt many crudities remained. Men spat on floors, and urinated on the stairways of the Louvre.
- “If a man needs a religion to conduct himself properly in this world,” said Ninon, “it is a sign that he has either a limited mind or a corrupt heart.” She might thence have concluded to the almost universal necessity of religion.
- every satire is a half-truth; in his philosophical moments Molière might have recognized the right of women to share in the intellectual life of their times. It is the women of France, even more than her writers and artists, who are the crown of her civilization, and the special glory of her history.
- By and large, however, the mentality and morals of the Catholic clergy—perhaps under the stimulus of competition from Huguenot ministers—were better than for centuries before.
- The Catholic Church had not explicitly repudiated the predestinarianism of St. Paul and St. Augustine, but she had let it sink into the background of her teaching as hard to reconcile with that freedom of the will which seemed logically indispensable to moral responsibility and the idea of sin.
- Today we find it hard to understand why a nation should have been divided, and a king so excited, about abstruse problems of divine grace, predestination, and free will; we forget that religion was then as important as politics seem now.
- Our passions may sometimes sleep, but our vanity never rests.
- The art of life lies in concealing our self-love sufficiently to avoid antagonizing the self-love of others. We must pretend to some degree of altruism.
- By 1650 religion [in England] had taken on a measure of social stratification: the poor favored the dissenting sects—Baptists, Quakers, Fifth Monarchy Men, etc.—or the Catholics; the middle classes were predominantly Puritans; the aristocracy and most of the gentry (untitled landowners) adhered to the disestablished Anglican Church.
- Intolerance was inverted rather than lessened. Instead of Anglicans persecuting Catholics, Dissenters, and Puritans, the triumphant Puritans, who formerly had clamored for toleration, now persecuted Catholics, Dissenters, and Anglicans.
- The Puritan regimen narrowed the mind but strengthened the will and the character. It helped to prepare Englishmen for self-rule.
- [The Puritans] addressed all persons by the singular thou or thee, instead of by the originally honorific plural you.
- [Under Cromwell] all the goals for which the Great Rebellion of 1642–49 had been fought had now been set aside. Taxation without representation or parliamentary approval, arrest without due process of law, trial without jury, were as flagrant as before; and rule by the army and naked force was made still more offensive by being coated with religious cant.
- we should note that at the height of the Puritan ascendancy (1653) Sir Thomas Urquhart published his spirited translation of Rabelais, preferring scatology to eschatology.
- Today the subject [of Paradise Lost] is the poem’s greatest handicap, a fairy tale recited to adults in twelve cantos; and a sustained effort is now required to accompany from beginning to end so long an exposition of so harsh and antiquated a theology. But never has nonsense been made more sublime.
- censorship increases with the insecurity of the government.
- Like the French dramatists, Milton indulges a passion for oratory; everyone from God to Eve makes speeches, and Satan finds hellfire no impediment to rhetoric. It is disturbing to learn that even in hell we shall have to listen to lectures.
- God, in this poem, is not the indescribable effulgence felt in Dante’s Paradiso; he is a Scholastic philosopher who gives long and unconvincing reasons why he, the omnipotent, allows Satan to exist, and allows him to tempt man, all the while foreseeing that man will succumb and bring all mankind to centuries of sin and misery. He argues that without freedom to sin there is no virtue, without trial there is no wisdom; he thinks it better that man should face temptation and resist it than not be tempted at all, quite unforeseeing that the Lord’s Prayer would beg God not to lead man into temptation. Who can help but sympathize with Satan’s revolt against such an incredible sadist?
- when the London populace mistook Nell [Gwyn] for her Catholic rival and jeered her, she put her pretty head out of the coach window and cried: “Be silent, good people; I am the Protestant whore.”
- Charles[II] accepted this harsh legislation because he was appealing to Parliament for funds, but he never forgave Clarendon, and lost respect for the bishops who, so soon after being restored, proved so hard in vengeance and poor in charity. Charles concluded that “Presbyterianism is no religion for a gentleman, and Anglicanism is no religion for a Christian.”
- in modern states the men who can manage men manage the men who can manage only things; and the men who can manage money manage all.
- The Anglican Church, which under Charles I had dared to say an occasional word for the poor, now concluded, from the Puritan Rebellion, that its interests would be best assured by identifying them entirely with those of the possessing classes.
- some seventy thousand Londoners, a seventh of the population, died of the plague in 1665.
- The morals of the unrecorded commoners were probably better than under Elizabeth, for economic routine kept them steady, they did not have the means to be wicked, and they still felt the stimulus and surveillance of their Puritan faiths.
- Religion had literally lost caste; it belonged to tradesmen and peasants; most preachers were put down as long-faced, long-eared, long-winded hypocrites and bores. The only religion fit for a gentleman was a polite Anglicanism wherein the master attended Sunday services to lend support to a chaplain who kept the villagers in fear of hell, and who said grace with due brevity from the foot of the master’s board.
- There were doubtless others, lost to history because virtue makes no news. The higher the rank, the lower the morals.
- The law struggled to discourage crime with what seems to us barbarous punishments; but perhaps sharp measures had to be used to penetrate dull minds. For treason the penalty was torture and death; for murder, felony, or counterfeiting the currency, hanging; the wife who killed her husband was to be burned alive.
- In 1675 it was estimated that two thirds of the Commons were in the pay of Charles II, and the other third in the pay of Louis XIV.
- Woman was already so intricate an artifact that a Restoration play pictured her in hyperbole: Her teeth were made in the Blackfriars, her eyebrows in the Strand, and her hair on Silver Street. . . . She takes herself asunder, when she goes to bed, into some twenty boxes, and about noon the next day is put together again like a great German clock.
- Drinking of alcoholic beverages was no merely social function. Water was scarcely ever drunk, even by children; beer was easier to find than water fit to drink. So everybody, of any age, drank beer, and the well-to-do added whiskey or imported wine. Most people visited a tavern once a day, and all classes got drunk now and then.
- Tea came to England from China about 1650, but it was so expensive that a century passed before it displaced coffee in the English ritual. Pepys thought it quite an adventure when he had his first cup of tea.
- Politics had sometimes to deal with crowds, which frightened Halifax. “There is an accumulative cruelty in a number of men, though none in particular are ill-natured . . . The angry buzz of a multitude is one of the bloodiest noises in the world.”
- Gradually the power of the periodical press overtook the influence of the pulpit in forming the public mind to private purposes, and a new secularizing force entered into history.
- [Anglican clergyman Jeremy Collier] condemned so many dramatists, from Aeschylus to Shakespeare to Congreve and Dryden, that all the indicted might feel acquitted by their company.
- [Johnathan Swift] opposed free thought, on the ground that “the bulk of mankind is as well qualified for flying as thinking.”
- when the prostitutes who served [Peter the Great] bemoaned their modest honorariums he replied that he paid them as much as he paid a grenadier, whose services were far more valuable.
- [In Germany] there were now some two hundred “temporal” principalities enjoying such independence; sixty-three ecclesiastical states ruled by Roman Catholic archbishops, bishops, or abbots; and fifty-one “free cities,” subject only to the emperor, and only formally to him. France rejoiced to see so many Germanies rather than one.
- Frederick William [of Prussia] began with a plan and a will, which are the first principle of statesmanship; then, by taxes and French subsidies, he raised money, which is the second principle of statesmanship; then, with money, he organized an Army, which is the third principle of statesmanship. By 1656 he had the first standing army in Europe—eighteen thousand trained men permanently in arms.
- He recognized that religious intolerance was an obstacle to economic and political development; he distinguished himself in Germany by allowing his people to remain Lutheran while he himself remained Calvinist; and he gave religious freedom to Catholics, Unitarians, and Jews.
- The German aristocracy now spoke German chiefly to servants. German authors wrote in French for the upper classes or in Latin for the learned world.
- History is a race between art and war.
- For the West the repulse of the Turks was an invitation to internecine war. Freed from the pressure of Islam, Austria and Germany turned to face the ambitions of Louis XIV, who was stretching his arms into the Netherlands, the Rhineland, the Palatinate, Italy, and Spain. These blows from the West completed the disintegration of the Holy Roman Empire; nothing remained of it but the form.
- The Thirty Years’ War left the Jews of Germany relatively unharmed. Protestants and Catholics were so engrossed in mutual murder that they almost forgot to kill Jews, even when these had lent them money.
- As accounts of other continents accumulated, the educated classes of Europe could not but marvel at the variety of religious beliefs on the earth, the similarity of religious myths, the confidence of each cult in the truth of its creed, and the moral level of Mohammedan or Buddhist societies that in some respects shamed the gory wars and murderous intolerance of peoples dowered with the Christian faith.
- The basic aversion is fear, the basic appetite is for power.
- [Hobbes:]If the Church were independent of the state there would be two sovereigns, therefore no sovereign; and subjects would be torn between two masters.
- The absolutist polity is a child of war, and democracy is a luxury of peace.
- The brave attempt of many Christian theologians to demonstrate the creed by reason weakened the creed; no one, said Anthony Collins, doubted the existence of God until the Boyle lecturers undertook to prove it.
- The Devil’s last stratagem, said Glanvill, is to spread the belief that he does not exist.
- When the American colonists rebelled against the resurgent monarchy of George III, they adopted the ideas, the formulas, almost the words, of Locke to express their Declaration of Independence. The rights that Locke had vindicated became the Bill of Rights in the first ten amendments to the American Constitution.
- [John Locke:] “I find every sect, as far as reason will help them, make use of it gladly; and where it fails them, they cry out, It is a matter of faith, and above reason.”
- Locke noted that most of the religions demanded toleration when they were weak, but refused it when they were strong. Persecution, he felt, comes from lust for power, and from jealousy masquerading as religious zeal.
- Did atheism lead to corrupt morals? If that were so, said Bayle, one would have to conclude, from the crime, corruption, and immorality prevalent in Europe, that most Christians are secret atheists. Jews, Mohammedans, Christians, and infidels differ in creeds, but not in deeds.
- As to all men inheriting the guilt of Adam and Eve: “A creature which does not exist cannot be an accomplice of an ill action.”
- [Spinoza:] the emphasis of religious teaching should always be upon conduct rather than creed. It is a sufficient creed to believe in “a God, that is, a supreme being who loves justice and charity,” and whose proper worship “consists in the practice of justice and love towards one’s neighbor.” No other doctrine is necessary.
- Determinism is predestinarianism without theology; it substitutes the primeval vortex or nebula for God. Spinoza followed the logic of mechanism to its bitter end.
- We had better, said Bayle, give up the idea of proving religious creeds; it merely brings the difficulties into clearer light.
- It is easier to be original and foolish than to be original and wise; there are a thousand possible errors for every truth, and mankind, with all its efforts, has not yet exhausted the possibilities.
- Not till Napoleon would France recover from Louis XIV, only to repeat his tragedy.
- Louis had the distinction of living so long that the Furies could revenge upon him in person, rather than upon his children, the sins of his pride and power.
- In judging Louis XIV we must remember Goethe’s humane dictum that a man’s vices are usually the influence of his time, while his virtues are his own; or, as the Romans had put it with characteristic brevity, vitium est temporis potius quam hominis—“vices are of the age rather than of the man.”
Profile Image for Helga.
1,166 reviews306 followers
August 11, 2021
This volume covers the history from the Treaty of Westphalia (1648) to the death of Louis XIV (1715), its main theme being the debate between faith and reason in Europe.
Profile Image for M. Ashraf.
2,167 reviews131 followers
July 1, 2020
The Age Of Louis XIV
The Story Of Civilization #8
Will Durant

Book I: The French Zenith: 1643–1715
Book II: England: 1649–1714
Book III: The Periphery: 1648–1715
Book IV: The Intellectual Adventure: 1648–1715
Book V: France Against Europe: 1683–1715

From the titles of the Volume and the books we focus more on Europe History during this period of time, we see the wars, the peace treaties, Science, philosophies, art, and the decline of religion.
We drift twice to see Russia and The Turks but again as it goes for the rest of the civilized world we did not embrace on another journey through new terra, we did not see the what is happening in the new worlds, North and South Americas, we did not go east to see China, Japan, Korea...etc nor went to Africa and see the imperialism in action and thus this one was not like other volumes in the series, and I did not like that!
But still, it was comprehensive giving an entire history of Europe during the period between 1643 and 1715.


Morally man is a mystery. All kinds of wickedness appear or lie hidden in him.

we may join the French in acclaiming the age of Louis XIV as standing with Periclean Greece, Augustan Rome, Renaissance Italy, and Elizabethan-Jacobean England among the peaks in the faltering trajectory of mankind.

Voltaire called the reign of Louis XIV “the most enlightened age the world has ever seen,” not anticipating that his own epoch would be named “the Enlightenment.” We should have to moderate his eulogy. Officially it was an age of obscurantism and intolerance, capped by the Revocation of the humane Edict of Nantes; “enlightenment” was the possession of a small minority discountenanced by the court and sometimes disgraced by epicurean excess. Education was controlled by a clergy dedicated to the medieval creed. Freedom of the press was hardly dreamed of; freedom of speech was a clandestine audacity amid enveloping censorship.

HISTORY is a fragment of biology—the human moment in the pageant of species. It is also a child of geography—the operation of land and sea and air, and of their forms and products, upon human desire and destiny.

“The application of science to nature,” said Fontenelle in 1702, “will constantly grow in scope and intensity, and we shall go on from one marvel to another. The day will come when man will be able to fly by fitting on wings to keep him in the air; the art will increase, . . . till one day we shall be able to fly to the moon.”

With Hobbes, Spinoza, Bayle, and Fontenelle the seventeenth century opened, between Christianity and philosophy, the long and bitter war that would culminate in the fall of the Bastille and the feast of the Goddess of Reason.
Profile Image for Matt.
695 reviews
May 16, 2024
The near three-quarters of a century from the end of the Thirty Years War to the death of Louis XIV saw the promise of French greatness being achieved then squandered allowing Britain to rise. The Age of Louis XIV is the eighth volume of The Story of Civilization series written by Will & Ariel Durant looking into the reign of the Sun King and how the politics and intellectual though rotated around him and France.

The book centered around France with the Netherlands, England/Britain, and the intellectual revolution for most of the text as well as the interaction between all of them over the course of the decades the Durants wrote about. While the rest of Europe is discussed, especially the continual rise of Russia during the reign of Peter the Great, the Durants give a good but brief synopsis of each location when not connected with the main portions of the book. The political, religious, and cultural developments of France and England were gone over in detail not only for their own history but how it affected the rest of the world. Yet for the Durants, especially Will, the portion of the book that the reader can tell they enjoyed writing and having a hard time holding back is the intellectual revolution in science and philosophy in the latter half of the 17th century and early 18th century. Not only are there chapters dedicated to Newton, Spinoza, and Leibniz but all the English political philosophers that have had influenced thought were covered in detail as well. A thorough reader of this series can tell that there is excitement and dedication to the intellectual revolution like that of the second volume of the series, The Life of Greece.

The Age of Louis XIV sees Will and Ariel Durant detailed not only the man who dominated a Europe undergoing an intellectual revolution but how he led his nation to disaster to the benefit of Britain.
Profile Image for Steve R.
1,055 reviews56 followers
April 12, 2018
A truly exceptional work of scholarship and lucid story telling, weaving as it does the dynastic experience of a king who reigned for all but five of the seventy-seven years of his life and brought his nation of France to both its height of civilized splendor and the depths of economic and military ruin together with military, economic, intellectual and philosophical developments throughout the European continent in the last parts of the seventeenth and the early part of the eighteenth centuries.

Louis XIV is, however, but the figurehead around whom the other brilliant lights of the late seventeeth century must be appreciated. The Subtitle of the work indicates this: 'A History of European Civilization in the Period of Pascal,Moliere, Cromwell, Milton, Peter the Great, Newton and Spinoza: 1648-1715. To think that this subtitle fails to allude to Locke, Swift, Defoe, Berkeley, Leibniz, Hooke, Halley, Hobbes or Descartes indicates the amazing plethora of intellectual development which changed the world of men's thought at this time.

Europe and with it, civilization, changed more in this half century than in any of the untold millennia preceding this age. Emblematic of this fundamental paradigm shift, the Dutchman Christian Huygens commented that 'The world is my country, and to promote science is my religion'. As an erstwhile atheist, it was only with this volume that I felt the spirit of humankind emerging from the primordial swamp of religious idolatry and ignorance into the true light of reason and scientific exactitude. In mathematics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, zoology, biology and many other academic disciplines - sadly, not in medicine- intellectual thought was finally taken away from the scholastic barriers of the church and given to the independent practitioners of logic and reason. It is not a mere coincidence that the last witches were burned in France in 1718 and in Scotland in 1722. The shackles of ignorant prejudice were slowly being discarded. The Royal Society was founded in 1660 in England and quickly became a focal point for scientific and intellectual changes. Such a development does not seem to have been feasible in the Europe of just a hundred years earlier, wracked as it was by the conflicts of the Reformation and the Counter Reformation. Men were, I believe, finally beginning to understand that there is no God and that to worry about spiritual matters is a simple waste of time and effort.

The period was, especially in the person of Louis XIV, the age of absolute monarchy - though he never supposedly said, 'L'etat c'est moi', the country certainly functioned as if this was the case. The sycophancy of the upper nobility and clergy, whose toadyism created the illustrious court of Versailles, eventually led, when coupled with Louis' headstrong willingness to engage in vainglorious wars, to the destitution and even starvation of the French peasantry, particularly during the War of the Spanish Succession (1702-1713). Taxation was so heavy, and so well avoided by the privileged orders, that people literally starved to death so as to finance the disastrous wars of Louis' later years. The days of mercenaries fighting small scale battles was over, as armies of over a hundred thousand men faced off against one another. Few young men were left to actually till the field and grow the food for the people to eat.

The symbol of this height of personal and aristocratic splendor was Versailles -a massive palace capable of maintaining 10000 souls, including over 700 rooms and costing 200,000,000 francs to build - where Louis' court presided. He was actually afraid, after the rebellions referred to as the Fronde, to visit Paris. The wrongheadedness of such noblesse oblige is typified by the lack of adequate restroom facilities being included in the original designs for Versailles, necessitating the unsanitary use of hallways and staircases.

Louis' absolutism was not peculiar to France. The decadence of the Restoration of Charles II in England was short lived, and overcome by the Glorious Revolution of 1688, when William and Mary simply took over after having been invited by Parliament. Peter the Great tried industriously to drag Russia into the modern world, but understandably resisted attempt to bring European scholars into his nation due to the backward, ignorant and - need we say? - religious prejudices of the majority of his populace.

But it is in the quasi-international, non-religious, realistic visions of Daniel Defoe's novels, Moliere's plays, Swift's satires and Milton's epic verse that the voice of modern man is, I believe, first resolutely heard. The printing press, around for over two hundred years now, was finally allowing the wider dissemination of knowledge through the written word. Corelli's concertos and Gluck's opera were written in the age during which both Handel and Bach were born.

Ignorance was not abandoned. The Revocation of the Edict of Nantes by Louis led to the expulsion of the Huguenots from France, which caused both social and even more so, economic dislocations which added to that nation's troubles at the turn of the century. Jews were relentlessly persecuted - from 1648 to 1679 anti Jewish atrocities outdid those of both the Crusades and the Black Death.

Against such stupid ignorance one must place the Treatise on Government, the Essay Concerning Human Understanding and the Essays on Toleration of John Locke - works which the Durants justly analyze as having paved the way to Rousseau and the French Revolution's overturning of the era of absolutism.

The age was certainly complex and operated far too often at destructive cross purposes. Nevertheless, through the famines, wars, oppression and untold difficulties of the poorer classes, the light of reason, science, toleration and progress had been lit. That the Durants have made this story such a gripping one is a testament to their skills both as historians and as writers. Very, very well done.
Profile Image for Stephen.
1,741 reviews120 followers
April 1, 2012
To read Will Durant is to feast from the smorgasbord of human history. Before the reader lies the full scope of human concern, frailty, and accomplishment, like so many varied dishes. The chef is a master: Durant's supple use of the English language seasons even the most mundane of subjects to the point that they sound exotic and entertaining. After positively binging myself by reading The Age of Faith, The Renaissance, The Reformation, and The Age of Reason Begins during the summer and fall, I was absolutely stuffed with the heritage of the west. Now after a wintry break, I'm looking forward to digging in again...and did so with The Age of Louis XIV, a tome covering the bloody retreat of religion and the rise of some of Europe's most famous or infamous leaders -- the Sun King in France, Peter the Great in Russia, and Cromwell in England.

Durant opens on France and England, as France emerges as Europe's cultural leader. The bloody religious wars are not over: religion is still quite relevant to the European mind, but happily its desperately violent attempts to hold on to power continue to ruin its credibility among the peoples of the continent. As the power of the church declines, those of the state rise, and no autocrat epitomizes this more than the Sun King, who built Versailles as a monument to the State and himself, and whose example was an inspiration to every other king in the continent. The growing strength of mechanized industry and commerce allow for the consolidation of power: the king's traditional enemy is not his people, but the rest of the aristocracy, and these men who base their strength on agricultural potency are being out-spent by the growing middle class, who for the moment see the king as their route to power. England proves an exception, beheading one king and attempting to institute a commonwealth...only to find itself enduring the regime of a miserable Puritan dictator, then returning to monarchy -- but this time, of a decidedly limited sort. In this work, the English king is losing influence -- and the House of Commons is gaining it. Soon, I suspect, I will be reading not of the Hanoverians but of prime ministers, of Tories and Whigs.

Although religious persecution is alive and well, religious thought is increasingly impotent. Durant is an author generally kind to religion in general, seeing it as an essential part of the fabric that holds societies together, but here the philosophy of the hour is concerned not with theology, but of humanity. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's works receive the attention formerly given to religious treatises, and Isaac Newton merits his own chapter. Durant curiously underplays Newton, whose work constituted a veritable revolution in the mental landscape, introducing the idea that the universe is a rational place knit together by laws which can be understood. This is his legacy, not the beliefs of the man himself -- Newton wrote extensively on theology and even dabbled in quackery like alchemy. For scientifically-minded readers, Louis XIV is a welcome relief from the constant religious debate of previous books. Like the rest of this series, the book is a comprehensive history which covers not only politics, science, and philosophy, but literature, the arts, and trade as well. Economics doesn't seem to be very well represented here, but Durant may be saving full elaboration on early industrial economies until the arrival of Adam Smith and his Wealth of Nations.

The Enlightenment is on its way, and I for one am looking forward to what lies ahead. As Alexander Pope wrote in his An Essay on Man -- "Go, wondrous creature; mount where science guides!"
Profile Image for Barry Belmont.
119 reviews23 followers
March 7, 2015
The Durants on the beginnings of science and the antechamber to the Enlightenment. Be still my heart.
Profile Image for Alex.
161 reviews17 followers
June 5, 2020
As the story continues it begins to revolve around Britain and England, two nations rapidly advancing in unprecedented wealth, culture, science, and technology, and honestly in much of those aspects it is the former which seems to have the lead, even leaving a decisive impression on a young visiting Voltaire, nonetheless it is France that dominates the continent, “an almost hypnotic dominance over Western Europe, in politics...language, literature, and art.” The book after all is titled the Age of Louis XIV.

The irony then, that the great age of absolutism begins with the proto-French Revolution, the story of the Fronde and the attempt to establish a constitutional monarchy in imitation of developments in England, again an ironic move for the 'leading' nation of Europe. However the attempt was a failure, in part due to institutional reasons. “The twelve parlements of France [who carried out the attempt] were not legislative chambers...they were judiciary and administrative bodies whose members inherited their seats...or were appointed by the king.” They also made the strategic mistake of seeking foreign intervention against all patriotic sensibilities. The monarchy was triumphant, and the age of the sun king began.

For all the cultural glory that accompanied Louis XIV, he comes off as a bloodthirsty warmonger, and indeed his wars are arguably the most famous aspect of his reign. If he didn't seek to openly conquer Europe, it seems that this was because it wasn't yet a strategic possibility. He tried to get as far as he could though, using the pretext of extending France to her 'natural boundaries.' In his own memoirs he writes of the battle field, where “great occasions might arise for distinguishing myself.” Durant sarcastically recaps the king's view “As for the human lives that would be lost, men must die in any case; how absurd to die of some lingering disease in bed! -how better could men die than in the anesthesia of battle, on the field of glory, and for their fatherland.” I think there was some coherent sincerity to the doctrine of natural frontiers, but it nonetheless comes off as a shameless pretext, and what a disturbing implication, that a king who could have all he ever wanted would be so attracted to butchering nations in the pursuit of war for its own sake.

Looking past this veneer of glory, I think Durant does a good job of bringing out the brutal aspects of war, “a new kind of war, in which no hired mercenaries fought the battles, but whole nations were conscripted for competitive massacre.” During the War of the League of Augsburg, “The King melted down his silverware to help taxation party the cost of the multitudes, he ordered all private individuals, and many churches to do the same, and he allowed [depreciation] by ten percent” and the country was devastated by poverty. Fenelon a future archbishop writes an anonymous letter to the king, “your people...are dying of hunger. The cultivation of the earth is almost abandoned; the towns and the countryside are depopulated; all industry languishes, and no longer supports the workers. All commerce is destroyed. You have consumed half the wealth and vitality of the nation to make and defend vain conquests abroad...Poplar uprisings, so long unknown, increase in frequency...” Abroad, an infuriated media paints Louis as the worst villain of the era: “From all Germany, the Netherlands, and England a cry rose for vengeance against the King of France. German pamphleteers denounced the French soldiers as Huns dead to any human feeling; they described Louis as a monster, a blasphemer, a barbarian worse than any Turk” It's a wonder that the monarchy, let alone the French nation survived such devastation, and having the major powers of Europe against them, but such endurance is a testament to the vitality and ingenuity of the French people. The fact that France was generally left untouched and with gains in fact, after the wars, probably also contributed to this. If the wars had been lost, the French revolution would have happened a century earlier.

Who were the cultural stars that brightened Louis' reign so much in this era? There was Moliere the prolific playwright and satirist, he aims his pen at religion, with Tartuffe, about a religious hypocrite, and Don Juan, about a shameless atheist and hedonist, and yet he defends himself against the charges of unbelief. Tartuffe is about hypocrisy not religion, he claims, and how can Don Juan be promoting atheism, if the character is an awful person, and he descends to hell at the end in a dramatic achievement of stagecraft. Taking into account the subtext however, the anti-religious charge does not seem so unfounded, but Moliere nonetheless won the personal friendship and support of the king. Moliere would satirize society in general, and in one comedy aimed against the medics of the era, four physicians are hired to cure a patient and yet cannot agree on the proper measures, in the meantime the patient recovers “which infuriates the doctors. 'It is better to die according to the rules than to recover contrary to them,' one of them exclaims. In 'The Miser' Moliere writes about a man who cannot even afford to give you a good day, he must lend you one. Durant rolls his eyes, but the play was one of Moliere's most popular. The Misanthrope is one of the most famous of his plays, and its more of a dramatic dialogue about honesty, and morality in general, and about how whether one must be absolute about virtue or make some pragmatic allowances. Durant informs us, not surprisingly, that upon viewing the play, Napoleon agreed with the latter view while Rousseau with the former.

Boileau was another satirist and a poet that won the admiration of the king. “I like Boileau”, said Louis, “as a necessary scourage that we can pit against the bad taste of second-rate authors.” Racine would write plays set in classical times, with so much intensity that the actor Montfleury bust a blood vessel acting in one of them and died. La Fontaine wrote fables featuring animals and “France rejoiced to find that their animals, even their insects, had been talking poetry all the time.” Madame de Sevigne gained fame through the letters she wrote to her daughter, “a loving mother, at home in the salons of the capital and the fields of Brittany; telling her daughter of the latest gossip of the aristocracy, but also that 'the nightingale, the cuckoo, and the warbler are beginning to sing in the spring of the woods.' “ Durant judges the work as “the best French in that age of the best French ever written.”

In charge of the kingdom were another set of brilliant men, most notable being the minister Colbert, “one of the most devoted and overspreading lives in history. Not since Charlemagne had a single mind so remade in so many phases so great a state” He “established high standards for each industry, hoping to win foreign markets by the refinement of design.” He “encouraged or provided scientific and technical education...[and] sponsored an encyclopedia of arts and crafts, and an illustrated description of all known machinery.” “He nationalized an expanded almost to suffocation, the regulation of industry...[prescribing] size, color, and quality of products, the hours and conditions of labor.” “Workers were subjected to an almost military discipline...[and] were punished by the employer sometimes by flogging.” Yet his reforms were not confined to business, he also promoted science, literature, and art.

There was the Bishop Bossuet whose sermons “are the most renowned in the literature of France. For the French heir, he wrote the Discourse on Universal History, emphasizing the theme of Providence acting upon history, and yet it apparently contained enough of an emphasis on secular progress, that Durant refers to it as a forerunner of Turgot and Condorcet. He also wrote what “[Henry Buckle] rated as 'probably the most formidable work ever directed against Protestantism”, four volumes of heavily researched material, arguing that no amount of church corruption could compare with the schisms, rapidly multiplying, and in the contemporary age, rapidly evolving into the rejection of all religion. In a prescient argument, he also notes that the Reformation also carried an element of social revolt, and the movement that had been launched against the Church, would eventually be turned against government itself. In spite of such polemics, Bossuet defended the heretical Gallican Liberties, by which the French state sought to dominate the Catholic Church within its borders. A careful diplomacy by Pope Innocent XI, defended the rights of the Church while preventing the tensions from becoming a full blown schism.
A shame that I don't have space to review Durant's coverage of Britain: the Britain of the Restoration and the Glorious Revolution, of Pepys' diary, Locke's politics, and Swift's wit. On the other side of the continent Russia rose under the brutal modernization schemes of Peter the Great, and Sweden was wiped out as a Great Power by a Russian led coalition. Durant barely covers moribund Spain, and it seems that the glowing energy of Renaissance Italy had finally cooled down. Germany lies dormant perhaps due to the recent disaster of the Thirty Years War. That other great dying empire of Turkey is also cast into the shadows. The Jewish people remain as vibrant and resilient as ever, a few being rich enough to become the friends of kings, producing and excommunicating men like Spinoza (whom apparently helped Durant lose his faith), and casting their hopes into men like Sabbati Zevi, whom in the 17th century was seriously considered by many Jews to be the Messiah, and an imminent restoration of Israel was awaited.

A third of the book is dedicated to the coverage of science, and this was the Age of Newton as much as it was of Louis. He showed interest in mechanics and mathematics from a very young age. Already recognized as an “unparalleled genius” before any of his main works, he was made a professor at age of twenty seven. In 1665 he began to develop a method of determining changing quantities. He considered that lines can be made up of the motion of points, planes by the motion of lines, and solids by the motion of planes, by taking into account the velocity of the constituent element, one would be allowed to calculate the changing area of a wide variety of quantities from distance, to area, to volume. Today we know this as differential calculus, but Newton at first called his method 'fluxions.' The term calculus was actually coined by Bernoulli, a man belonging to multiple generations of scientific genius, and suggested to Leibniz. The controversy over who invented calculus first, is covered and it's rather odd how closely timed the ideas of the two men were.

Yet Newton still has his own undisputed contributions to knowledge. His contributions to optics are covered, and of course mechanics and gravity. “When a stranger asked Newton how he had discovered the laws of gravitation, he replied, 'by thinking of them without ceasing.'” Newton was not the first to consider the interstellar bodies attract each other, but he was the first to elaborate a theory so thoroughly and with such mathematical precision. He established that gravitational attraction varies inversely with the square of the distance, and yet even this concept was entangled in a controversy over who came up with it first. Nonetheless the Principia Mathematica, proved to be one of the most important scientific works in history. The idea of all matter in the universe exerting a force on all other matter, through empty space, with no discernible medium, proved difficult for the scientific community to accept and yet it was a revolution, meeting no serious challenge until the age of Einstein and speaking of Einstein, Durant cites a few of his ideas that Newton anticipated. In Opticks, Newton wonders whether mass can bend rays of light, and whether matter could be changed into light (energy), and vice versa.

I enjoyed learning about how Huygens “corresponded in six languages with Descartes, Roberval, Mersenne, Fermat, Pascal, Newton, Boyle, and many others.” I also enjoyed learning about how Sir William Petty, international and multi-disciplinary, studied at “Caen, Utrecht, Leiden, Amsterdam, and Paris, taught anatomy at Oxford, and music at Gresham, and won fortune and knighthood as a physician in Ireland, and also helped develop the field of statistics.

Voltaire was in England during these times, to be impressed by the honors shown at Newtons funeral, but also by English thought in general. Durant dismisses the opinion of a historian who thought the Enlightenment can be said to have entirely originated in England, and yet its influence was immense. Two English Revolutions had already placed great restrictions over the powers of the king. The great English philosophers of the era, Locke and Hobbes wrote on politics and proposed ideal governments. Durant notes that the alternative to losing one's faith in God was gaining a faith in political progress. Politics was becoming the new religion, and the world approached the era of great revolutions.
Profile Image for Sjors.
297 reviews8 followers
February 20, 2022
A grand tour of Europe during the time of Louis XIV. I enjoy Durant’s sweeping vistas, never bogged down in details. I finally got a better picture of the war of the Spanish succession and should be ready for my Saint Simon now.
Profile Image for Eric.
10 reviews8 followers
January 31, 2014
I found this to be a good overview of that period of history. The book covers most of Western Europe (France, Britain, the Netherlands, Sweden--who knew the Swedes were ever such bad asses?, the Austrian Empire, Russia, etc.) without going into book-length detail on each country or empire. I think of it as a good way to discover interesting people or events that would then be worth reading more. Peter the Great sounds particularly interesting with his drive to drag Russia kicking and screaming out of the Dark Ages.

The book is broken up country / empire and then politics and arts (literature, science, etc.) for each. I found that I just didn't care about the arts chapters and skipped most of those. Also, because each section is dedicated to one country or empire at a time, I found it difficult to keep track of what was going on in the other countries at the same time. The dates were a blur and right now I couldn't tell you how the rules of Peter the Great and Louis XIV overlapped in time.
Profile Image for Dovofthegalilee.
200 reviews
November 1, 2012
** Warning** these volumes are not for the faint of heart! What else can be said? Any book that is liable to give you tendinitis or require you to build a reading stand is most certainly going to be a challenge. Volume eight delivers just that and much more. I grew tired in reading this, perhaps it was a build up of the prior two books combined with this one but he goes on and on about the philosophy of these men that while relevant it seems wrongly placed. Thankfully he keeps poems to a minimum [so far] but to delve that deep into a figure is to amplify one over another.He touches on things I want to know about e.g. dress of the times, money, professions but they are summing-ups of the period and are far shorter than the length he goes on about Spinoza or Locke.
Profile Image for Henrik Haapala.
591 reviews98 followers
April 14, 2021
Amazing book by the Durants.

Some of the contents:

• Spinoza
• Leibniz
• Descartes
• Pascal
• Cromwell
• Milton
• Newton
• Locke
• Hume
• Bacon
• Hobbes
• Louis XIV
• Ivan the terrible
• Romanov

Profile Image for Tom Brennan.
Author 5 books85 followers
January 14, 2020
Eight. Thousands and thousands of pages. In all those thousands of pages I find Durant here in this volume to be just as brilliant of a wordsmith as he was before, just as detailed in his research, and just as wide-ranging in his discussions as he has been in the first seven. At the same time, I confess I have begun to see two particular problems, or perhaps I should say the onset of two particular problems that I suspect will continue to develop through the rest of the series.

The first problem is that he is beginning to repeat himself. Perhaps this is because he has slowed down the further he has gone in this series. He orginally set out to write the history of all of human civilization. At this point in the series he has scaled that back to a history of Europe through the 18th century. Ish. That means his books have become more closely stacked one on top the other in chronology. It also means his observations are beginning to be so connected to each other that he is repeating himself.

The second, and worse, problem is that his own internal religious/philosophical biases are beginning to creep in more and more. The careful reader can tell all along that he is not a believer in any orthodox sense. But he has also been at pains to set that aside, and simply tell the history of what he comes across, including religion. And he does so in a way that shows he understands the actual theological arguments (re the Reformation, for example, etc.) much more than most historians I read. I commend him for that care in study and research. At the same time what used to be hints that he personally favored the humanism of the Enligtenment has become at this point more than hints. It isn't that he is telling history any differently or leaving out things so as to make Christianity look bad. He is simply passing judgment more and more often on those who hold an orthodox view of the Bible, and a basic faith in its contents. He has become more open about this judgment as the series has progressed. I suspect in the next book we shall see his biased criticallity truly flourish, and that is sad to me on both a personal level and an intellectual/historian level.

Having said that, Durant is certainly still worth reading. Especially if you have, like I have, labored this far into the series.

Onward...
185 reviews1 follower
July 10, 2019
This is volume eight of the Story of Civilization and continues the “Age of Reason” theme within the context of Western Europe and Louis the XIV, 1648 - 1715. Now that the great debate between faith and reason is mostly over the authors can focus on the expansion of science, economics, education, politics, art, literature, morality, manners, religion, music, and philosophy. The Durants are very thorough in these areas especially in the area of philosophy. In this time period is found the foundations for the Industrial Revolution, modern medicine, and the seeds of modern democracy, the social contract all framed by the life and times of King Louis XIV of France. A good read but a bit tedious.
Profile Image for Chancellor Fangirl.
245 reviews7 followers
September 20, 2017
Always love this series and Durant's writing. Such a great overview of stuff to go more in depth with later.
Profile Image for Christopher.
397 reviews5 followers
July 9, 2019
Re-read after 40 years—enjoyed it more the second time around
Profile Image for Petrea.
168 reviews
May 14, 2015

spending a few months in a bygone age is an adventure--some times I love the writing style, sometimes I hate the fact that Will Durant has to impose his personal philosophy on other people and times. It's always educatioal. This period of time in Europe reminded me so much of watching the daily news--Then it was various types of Christians fighting viciously with each other and with the Turks--this time it is various types of Muslins against each other--and a few Christians. the beheadings, burning, destruction were all the same. The kings happy impoverished and starved their subjects to wage their wars.
But there were also artists, scientists, philosophers living who greatly advanced civilization. I'm glad to have learned about Pascal. What a great time it was when Moliere,, John Milton,Defoe, Addison, Pepys, Hobbes, Locke, Descarte, Spinoza, Leibnitz were all writing. The scientific giant of the age was Newton, but Halley, Boyle, and many others helped advance knowledge in many fields. Of course the great political figure was Louis XIV himself, but it was also the times during which the English went through kings, the revolution, more kings and finally a Dutch king and a somewhat English Queen--William and Mary.
489 reviews13 followers
October 23, 2015
Volume VIII of the Durant's History of Civilization is a joy. Against the background of Le Grand Siecle plays out the story of the English Restoration and the Glorious Revolution, the decay and death of Habsburg Spain, the brief sunburst of Sweden, the slow recovery of Germany from the desolation of the Thirty Years War, the entry of Russia into European history at the hands of Peter the Great, the decay of Poland and the Baltic States, Italy and Portugal. The names of the philosophers, mathematicians and scientists are glorious. This is indeed perhaps the most glorious century for human reason: Galileo, Descartes, Pascal, Locke, Newton, Leibniz, Hobbes, Spinoza, Bayle, among many others. The underlying theme is that this century saw the final battle between faith and reason and set the stage for the latter 's victory. The book is as always brilliant, light and deep at the same time, with enormous love for its subject. A good complement is Tim Blanning's The Pursuit of Glory.
Profile Image for Ethan.
16 reviews
January 31, 2009
This is a great book that covers, in dense detail, an epochal moment in history. It is long, but well worth the read. I appreciated the way Durant covers particular countries and regions--France, England, Spain, Italy, Russia, etc.--and also goes through miniature biographies of all of the major figures of the time. Also insightful were the lengthy discussions on religion, philosophy, and science. The era of Louis XIV was truly an amazing one; a turning point for humanity.
Profile Image for David Glad.
191 reviews25 followers
August 19, 2013
Again, another engaging book by Will Durant that could keep me going -- literally on the treadmill in the case of the audiobook -- for so many hours.

Certainly the European alliances could well hint at future continental (and world) wars and definitely is "Age" in bringing us toward the present.

As I must sound repetitive, there are books covering time periods and part of this is listening for the author and Will Durant is always a treat.
Profile Image for Bev.
129 reviews
November 5, 2012
Have been reading this series for years. Love all the personal detail about the people and facts. It is not long and boring, writes most important things to flesh out the story and people. Covered 1650 to 1715, interesting to know what was happening in Europe in those years--years some of my ancestors were driven to emigrate. I skipped most of the literature, science, etc. just read history. Easy to pick and choose.
Profile Image for James Violand.
1,247 reviews65 followers
June 29, 2014
This review applies to all Durant's History of Civilization. The author does not follow a strictly chronological approach, but emphasizes those events/personages that have developed our Western civilization. He tends to emphasize certain personalities - some of whom I take exception to - but he stresses those things which make Western man unique. The arts have a prominent place in developing our culture and Durant convinces the reader how important they are.
Profile Image for Don.
1,564 reviews20 followers
October 23, 2016
faith and reason religion and meaning, atheism of 1703, free thinking, atheism, lack of morals, Russian improvement/decline cycles destroy innovations to maintain control, nothing fails like success, people same oppressed/oppress, virtue is strength like courage, peace via union harmony of men’s souls, 17th century thinkers of God age of reason, France 1/5 decline throughout destroy to make great.
Profile Image for Erik Graff.
5,086 reviews1,277 followers
July 16, 2013
The second of Will and Ariel Durant's collaborations, this constitutes a very good general introduction to the period and, like all volumes of their Story of Civilization series, is strong on the ideologies, philosophies and sciences of the period as well as on political and cultural events and practices.
113 reviews2 followers
June 14, 2014
Reading Durant (this is the eighth of eleven volumes) has been one of the most wonderful experiences of my life. Assuming I am lucky enough to finish the remaining three volumes, I'll write a more complete review. Until then, I recommend this series, The Story of Civilization, to anyone wanting an enlightening read couched in wonderfully witty prose.
739 reviews
January 16, 2016
Readability: 6. Rating: 6. Not as gripping for me as Our Oriental Heritage, but that is likely due to the fact that I am no Francophile, and although Louis's tempest is certainly interesting, it can only take me so far.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 72 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.