User reviews

I was hoping they would focus on the architecture of the buildings - the way the homes and constructed. The design process. Instead they seem to focus every episode almost entirely on the owners and their personal stories. Could have been so much better, such a shame.

This is going to be a somewhat skewed review as I haven't had time to view all of the episodes, but I fail to see how anyone can think that the owner/architect of the 344 sq ft home in "Hong Kong" is that far outside of "average" - which seems to be the criterion most viewers were looking for in this series. But if the creators of "Home" had sought out "average" architects (rather than "creative" ones) how would they merit a series about those designs, if their creations followed everyone else's cookie-cutter housing?

To me, the Hong Kong architect came across as down-to-earth, practical, and driven. The home which he remodeled had been in his family for generations, and his intention was to keep it in the family, and make it more livable in the process. However high-tech (and yes, expensive) the interior of his tiny home might have been, the view OF its EXTERIOR, and FROM its interior starkly revealed the incredibly average environment which this man's home was crammed into. So to me, this particular episode at least (and "Malibu," from a different perspective) did exactly what another reviewer accused it of failing to do, namely, showing us "...these homes, how they were built and how people actually live in them."

To be fair, I can easily imagine a series such as this swinging in the opposite direction, and focusing more on "special owners" and egos, rather than the pragmatic (but much less 'sexy') transformation of "manufactured" homes, as only one example. The "average" viewer/homeowner could probably have benefited more from this approach, and therefore, yes, perhaps the series as a whole could have been more balanced. But I still valued the passion and insight that I took from parts of "Home."

Some of the episodes felt a bit slow and concentrated more on the story of the builders than the actual homes, but the Malibu episode was an inspiring standout. The Skysource invention is brilliant and gives me some hope that there are still amazingly smart people like David Hertz solving problems to give the entire planet a better future.

I'm not typically into architecture shows, but this series is so much more interesting than displaying fancy homes. It has such a diverse yet universal message about the idea of creating a home that transcends any other show about houses. It reminds me what Chef's Table did for cooking. A great find in a world where shows focus more on the cynical world rather than the hopeful one.

I watched the first season of this show a year or so ago and really liked it. The second season - not so much. This review will be basically about the second season since it's fresh in my mind.

On too many of the "Homes" - the owner/architects and their backgrounds and, frankly, childhoods and all kinds of other things were examined. Everything BUT the house.

This is called "Home" - Not "Meet the Family". I watched this because of an interested in the architecture and a bit of background is great, but OMG, there were episodes where the house was barely shown, but I now know waaaaaaaay too much about the people who built them.

I won't give a list, because everything is relevant. The ones that are good are so worth the watch! The ones that aren't, well, they are people's stories and I used fast forward. You can too, if you want.

Sad commentary on what could have been a really memorable show.

I love this series. Especially the Bali bamboo houses, the African, the Iceland, sweden, France & India. So connected to local materials, history & family. My favorite was the Iceland concrete factory house.

The most boring ones were the ones in USA in Malibu & Austin, Long Island, Chicago . Expensive, shallow & disconnected.

The series explores different homes as well as its inhabitants that created them around the world.

Before watching the series I must say that I was fairly excited. I'm a big fan of Netflix Abstract series, and when a high quality docu-series about architecture was about to come out by Apple I had high expectations. But I have to say that I feel as if the series is a bit flat, and hasn't managed to get the same depth as Abstract. In the case of Home, I feel as if the creators has strived to tell a more sensational and sentimental story, instead of showing us these homes, how they were built and how people actually live in them. The music can sometimes also be a bit forced. I feel throughout the series as if the music heavily tried to make us feel something specific at any given moment.

I ended the series with the knowledge of a lot of cool new homes, but nothing about how it is to live in them.

This is a fantastic series of half hour documentaries about love. Very inspiring from any view of the words love and home. Apple TV+ has another series called Dear ... I watch this series and want to say Dear Everyone involved thank you for your love - it makes me feel at home.

I wish this series was required viewing in high schools and anyone interested in sustainability for our planet. Taken in its entirety this series can open your mind to possibility and imagination for ways to create a better world, one home at a time! There are also opportunities to connect with projects that excite you. Architecture , urban planning, sustainable materials and water usage are key elements that the series investigates and presents. I wish I had studied this series as a high school student. I think I would have been inspired to become one of these people for a career. But as it is, I am inspired to live my life with the new awareness HOME has taught me!

The houses are beautiful/spectacular etc. But the show focuses too much on the owners, if not almost entirely...who are all huge ego's, and love talking about how brilliant they are. With their friends and mothers being interviewed saying things like "he was always different/special" blah blah. Seriously, this is cringing. There are much better shows that focus on the house rather than the person who (barely) "thought" of it.

Waste of time, if you expect some decent architecture shots and walk troughs and even talk about the details of it you are just wasting your time since you won't get anything of those in this show. Instead you get a documentary about the owners, at least label it correctly if you make a show like this...

Some of the houses in this series are very cool however I am not sure it is worth it to have to endure the cheesy music and pretentious drivel that spews out of these people's mouths like vomit from a possessed person being exorcised.

Interesting to watch, but the people involved seem to have no understanding of reality or care to know what it is like to be the "average" person.

The first season was intriguingly designed homes all o we the world. The second season is largely virtue waving and social justice issues. Mostly fast forwarded through most of the current episodes and probably will skip it if there is a third season as value driven.

Personally I love architecture, especially sustainable and affordable homes. It's something we all need. So when I came across this series by Apple I was excited, but it didn't last. Each episode is like an iphone. In fact I'm sure everyone in the series is an iphone user. Wealthy architects. Pretentious vapid morons spouting a load of nonsense about connection, landscape, nature. Yeah right! In fact most of each episode is taken up with these pretentious millionaires lives and very little is said about the homes themselves. Worst of all, they're not even innovative. Most are only suitable for a certain climate and use conventional materials. Some don't even really work. A case of aesthetics over functionality. Funny how they don't talk about the flies in their house as they sit strumming guitars in their windowless home like a bunch of idiots. Such a disappointment.