Talk:Structured Discussions/Deprecation: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Iniquity in topic Template and category for deprecation
Content deleted Content added
→Template and category for deprecation: new topic |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::: Of course it's already done :) Here we are more talking about the fact that some editorial functionality that will be implemented in DT in a few years can already be used in CD. And as part of the transition from Flow/LT, this will make life easier for many: moving topics, editing messages, deleting messages, and more. That is, as one of the arguments for switching to DT, you can use the fact that if something happens, DT can be replaced with CD if some extra functionality is needed. [[User:Iniquity|Iniquity]] ([[User talk:Iniquity|talk]]) 18:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
::: Of course it's already done :) Here we are more talking about the fact that some editorial functionality that will be implemented in DT in a few years can already be used in CD. And as part of the transition from Flow/LT, this will make life easier for many: moving topics, editing messages, deleting messages, and more. That is, as one of the arguments for switching to DT, you can use the fact that if something happens, DT can be replaced with CD if some extra functionality is needed. [[User:Iniquity|Iniquity]] ([[User talk:Iniquity|talk]]) 18:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
Yeah, if Convenient Discussions is so important, and this shows it is, it should be enable-able via, and have the prominence of, a checkbox in Preferences. And the claim that DiscussionTools provides [[Structured Discussions/Deprecation#Structured Discussions and DiscussionTools Comparative review|the vast majority of features Structured Discussions offer]] isn't even close to not misleading without CD. --[[User:RudolfoMD|RudolfoMD]] ([[User talk:RudolfoMD|talk]]) 18:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC) |
Yeah, if Convenient Discussions is so important, and this shows it is, it should be enable-able via, and have the prominence of, a checkbox in Preferences. And the claim that DiscussionTools provides [[Structured Discussions/Deprecation#Structured Discussions and DiscussionTools Comparative review|the vast majority of features Structured Discussions offer]] isn't even close to not misleading without CD. --[[User:RudolfoMD|RudolfoMD]] ([[User talk:RudolfoMD|talk]]) 18:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Template and category for deprecation == |
|||
I have created {{tl|HadFlow}} and {{c|Discussion pages migrated away from Flow}}. You can use this template after moving 'flow' page in archive. Example: [[User talk:Iniquity]]. [[User:Iniquity|Iniquity]] ([[User talk:Iniquity|talk]]) 11:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:57, 5 January 2024
We welcome all questions regarding Structured Discussions's deprecation process, in any language.
Convenient
IMO DiscussionTools should just be replaced with an integration of ConvenientDiscussions instead /hj Aaron Liu (talk) 23:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I also look at the functionality table and see that almost everything is implemented in CD xD Iniquity (talk) 01:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- You are free to do so, on your account. :) Trizek_(WMF) (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Of course it's already done :) Here we are more talking about the fact that some editorial functionality that will be implemented in DT in a few years can already be used in CD. And as part of the transition from Flow/LT, this will make life easier for many: moving topics, editing messages, deleting messages, and more. That is, as one of the arguments for switching to DT, you can use the fact that if something happens, DT can be replaced with CD if some extra functionality is needed. Iniquity (talk) 18:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- You are free to do so, on your account. :) Trizek_(WMF) (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, if Convenient Discussions is so important, and this shows it is, it should be enable-able via, and have the prominence of, a checkbox in Preferences. And the claim that DiscussionTools provides the vast majority of features Structured Discussions offer isn't even close to not misleading without CD. --RudolfoMD (talk) 18:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Template and category for deprecation
I have created {{HadFlow}} and Discussion pages migrated away from Flow. You can use this template after moving 'flow' page in archive. Example: User talk:Iniquity. Iniquity (talk) 11:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)