1. Introduction
The main purpose of the present paper is to continue the investigation of the 3-body problem of classical electrodynamics in the 3D Kepler formulation from [
1,
2]. The number of equations of motion for 3 bodies in the Minkowski space is 12, while the unknown functions are 9. It is proved in [
2] that the last three equations are consequences from the first 9 once. These three equations (two in the Kepler formulation) give estimations of the energy of the moving particles. Our main goal here is to calculate this energy and compare it with the values from quantum mechanics [
3,
4]. The results obtained refer to the helium atom where both electrons circle on the first (ground) stationary state.
The paper consists of six sections and References.
Section 1 is an Introduction. In
Section 2, a derivation of the explicit form of the equations of motion for the three-body problem is made. Every vector equation contains in the right-hand side the Lorentz force and a radiation term. The Lorentz force is a sum of two terms each of which shows the influence of the other two particles on the first one. In
Section 3, the formalism of the transition to the Euclidean coordinates is described, introducing delays depending on the unknown trajectories. In
Section 4, we obtain the radiation part of the energy terms in the energy equations. In
Section 5 we obtain inequalities which allow us to estimate the energy of the moving particles.
Section 6 is a Conclusion. We calculate the energy of the moving electrons rounding the nuclei. We establish that with the natural parameters of electron motion, the energies coincide with the values obtained from quantum mechanics [
3,
4].
The equations of motion for the 3-body problem introduced in [
2] are:
As usually Latin indices run from 1 to 4, while Greek – from 1 to 3.
Let us note the number of equations in (1) is 12, while the unknown functions (trajectories) are 9. It is proved in [
2] that every 4-th equation is a consequence of the previous three ones. In this way one obtains that the independent equations in (1) are 9 in number.
2. Derivation the Explicit Form of the Energy Equation
We follow the procedure introduced in [
2]. By
we denote the space-time coordinates of the charged particles. The dot product in the Minkowski space is
, while in the 3-dimensional subspace ―
c is the vacuum speed of light;
are the proper masses of the particles;
― their charges. The elements of proper times are
and the unit tangent vectors to the world lines are
, where
,
.
To compare denotations with originally accepted ones we recall that (cf. [
5]):
The components of accelerations are .
The isotropic vectors
are obtained as in [
2] (cf. [
5,
6]). Namely, fix any event on the world line of the
k-th particle and draw the light cone into the past. This cone intersects the world line of the
n-th particle in any other (past) event. Then
Since
, the retarded functions
should satisfy the following 6 functional equations
For the velocities vectors we have
where
;
.
To derive the explicit form of the radiation terms (cf. [
7]), we consider a charge
describing any curve
in the space-time. Let
be any event and let
be the intersection of with the null-cone drawn into the past from , and be the intersection of with the null-cone drawn into the future from . Let and be the isotropic vectors
, . Then we set
and
and obtain
The velocity vectors to the world-line
at
and
are:
Following the Dirac physical assumptions we define the radiation term as a half of the difference between both retarded and advanced potentials (cf. [
7])
, where
and
.
Then the equations of motion become
:
In the present paper we investigate only the fourth, eight and twelfth equations
:
3. Transition to the Euclidean Coordinates
Following reasoning from [
7] the relations
yield
For the retarded part of radiation term we differentiate with respect to and obtain and in a similar way for advanced term we obtain .
Further on,
Then the energy equations become
:
or
4. Transformation of the Radiation Part of the Energy Terms
Here we follow the Dirac assumption
,
is a small parameter. This assumption is motivated by the fact
. Since
are infinitely smooth functions, using the Taylor expansions we have:
Then the radiation part becomes
It is known that (cf. [
5]):
In the Keper formulation one obtains
and
, because we consider the case
and then
- Sommerfeld fine structure constant (cf. [
3]).
Further on,
5. Energy Inequalities
We recall that ,,.
In the 3D-Kepler formulation the first particle P1 is put at the origin O(0,0,0), that is, P1. Then .
We pass to the spherical coordinates, that is, the particle
is located at the point
where
and then the velocities are:
where
. For the accelerations we have (cf. [
1,
2]):
In the same manner we obtain the expressions for the second derivatives
:
Then
;
;
;
;
Recall that
implies
and
Since
, then
and
6. Conclusion - Numerical Verification of the Above Formulas
For the He-atom both electrons are on the first stationary state, that is, one can assume
. Let us choose such that
and
and
. It is known that
,
,
,
. Consequently for
:
Since
then
Let us compare the obtained energy with the energy of the first stationary state from quantum mechanics (cf. [
4]). Since
for
one obtains
It is easy to see that one can choose
in such a way that
. Indeed, for
we obtain
for
.
We note that similar results can be obtained if but .
References
- Angelov, V.G. 3-body 3D-Kepler electromagnetic problem – existence of periodic solutions. Applied Math. 2024, 4, 612–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelov V.G. The electromagnetic three-body problem with radiation terms – derivation of equations of motion (I). Results in Nonlinear Anal. 2020, 3(2), 45-58. (ISSN 2636-7556).
- Sommerfeld A. Atomic Structure and Spectral Lines: London, Mathuen and Co., 1934.
- Pohl R.W. Optik und Atomphysik: Springer Verlag, 1963.
- Synge J.L On the electromagnetic two-body problem, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A177, 1940, 118-139. [CrossRef]
- Driver, R.D. A two-body problem of classical electrodynamics; one-dimensional case. Annals of Physics (N. Y.). 1963, 21, 122–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelov V.G. On the original Dirac equations with radiation term. Libertas Mathematica (Texas). 2011, 31, 57-86. ISSN: 0278-5307 (print version); 2182-567X (online version).
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).