0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views2 pages

Indicated Thermal Efficiency (%) : BP (KW)

The document contains three graphs comparing engine performance with and without exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). The graphs show that with EGR, indicated thermal efficiency and brake thermal efficiency are higher while mass flow rate of air is lower compared to without EGR across different brake power levels.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views2 pages

Indicated Thermal Efficiency (%) : BP (KW)

The document contains three graphs comparing engine performance with and without exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). The graphs show that with EGR, indicated thermal efficiency and brake thermal efficiency are higher while mass flow rate of air is lower compared to without EGR across different brake power levels.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2

ITE (%)

Indicated thermal efficiency (%)


90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

With EGR
without EGR

2000

4000

6000

8000

BP(kw)

Mass flow rate of air(kg/hr)


40
35
Mair(kg/hr)

30
25
20

With EGR

15

Without EGR

10
5
0
0

2000

4000
BP(kw)

6000

8000

Brake thermal efficiency (%)


70
60

BTE(%)

50
40
30

Series1

20

Without EGR

10
0
0

2000

4000
BP(kw)

6000

8000

You might also like