Presbiterio Vs Comelec
Presbiterio Vs Comelec
RATIO: A failure of election may be declared only in the three instances stated in Section 6
of the OEC: the election has not been held; the election has been suspended before the
hour fixed by law; and the preparation and the transmission of the election returns have
given rise to the consequent failure to elect, meaning nobody emerged as the winner.
Furthermore, the reason for such failure of election should be force majeure, violence,
terrorism, fraud or other analogous causes. Finally, before the COMELEC can grant a verified
petition seeking to declare a failure of election, the concurrence of 2 conditions must be
established, namely: (1) no voting has taken place in the precincts concerned on the date
fixed by law or, even if there was voting, the election nevertheless resulted in a failure to
elect; and (2) the votes cast would affect the result of the election.
In the instant case, it is admitted by the petitioners that elections were held in the subject
locality. Also, the private respondents and four of the petitioners won in the elections and
were proclaimed as the duly elected municipal officials. There is nothing in the records from
which the Court can make even a slim deduction that there has been a failure to elect.
Absent any proof that the voting did not take place, the alleged disenfranchisement of the
946 individuals and 2,000 more supporters of the petitioners cannot even be considered as
a basis for the declaration of a failure of election. Had petitioners been aggrieved by the
allegedly illegal composition and proceedings of the MBOC, then they should have filed the
appropriate pre-proclamation case contesting the aforesaid composition or proceedings of
the board, rather than erroneously raising the same as grounds for the declaration of failure
of election. On the TRO issued by the MCTC and the subsequent defiance thereof by the
MBOC, suffice it to state that the propriety of suspending the canvass of returns or the
proclamation of candidates is a pre-proclamation issue that is solely within the cognizance of
the COMELEC.[21] In sum, petitioners have not adduced any ground which will warrant a
declaration of failure of election.