Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 748 views

    UMTS Handover Performance Monitor Guide 2012-06-13

    Uploaded by

    Ryan Felix
    This document provides an overview and analysis of handover performance for UMTS networks. It defines key performance indicators for soft handover (SHO), inter-frequency handover, and inter-RAT handover. The document analyzes SHO, inter-frequency, and inter-RAT handover performance for specific cells, identifying main causes of failure such as weak coverage, transmission alarms, and poor signal quality. It proposes improvements like RF optimization, solving transmission issues, and adjusting handover configuration parameters.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    UMTS Handover Performance Monitor Guide 2012-06-13

    Uploaded by

    Ryan Felix
    748 views16 pages
    This document provides an overview and analysis of handover performance for UMTS networks. It defines key performance indicators for soft handover (SHO), inter-frequency handover, and inter-RAT handover. The document analyzes SHO, inter-frequency, and inter-RAT handover performance for specific cells, identifying main causes of failure such as weak coverage, transmission alarms, and poor signal quality. It proposes improvements like RF optimization, solving transmission issues, and adjusting handover configuration parameters.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides an overview and analysis of handover performance for UMTS networks. It defines key performance indicators for soft handover (SHO), inter-frequency handover, and inter-RAT handover. The document analyzes SHO, inter-frequency, and inter-RAT handover performance for specific cells, identifying main causes of failure such as weak coverage, transmission alarms, and poor signal quality. It proposes improvements like RF optimization, solving transmission issues, and adjusting handover configuration parameters.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    748 views16 pages

    UMTS Handover Performance Monitor Guide 2012-06-13

    Uploaded by

    Ryan Felix
    This document provides an overview and analysis of handover performance for UMTS networks. It defines key performance indicators for soft handover (SHO), inter-frequency handover, and inter-RAT handover. The document analyzes SHO, inter-frequency, and inter-RAT handover performance for specific cells, identifying main causes of failure such as weak coverage, transmission alarms, and poor signal quality. It proposes improvements like RF optimization, solving transmission issues, and adjusting handover configuration parameters.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    of 16

    UMTS Handover Performance Monitor Guide

    Present by: E2E Team Date: 2012-06-13

    Scope
    Definition of SHO Handover KPI SHO Performance Analysis SHO Performance Improvement Definition of Inter-Frequency Handover KPI Inter-Frequency Performance Analysis Inter-Frequency Performance Improvement Definition of Inter-RAT Handover KPI Inter-RAT Performance Analysis Inter-RAT Performance Improvement

    Definition of SHO Handover KPI


    Soft handover is the procedure during which a radio link is added to or deleted from the active set. When an UE moves or the radio link quality fluctuates, the RNC adds a radio link to the active set if the RNC detects that the cell of the radio link is of good signal quality. If the quality of a radio link in a cell in the active set becomes lower than the predefined threshold, the RNC deletes this radio link from the active set. RNC Level: VS.SHO.Succ.RNC / VS.SHO.Att.RNC *100%
    Cell Level: (VS.SHO.SuccRLDel+ VS.SHO.SuccRLAdd) / (VS.SHO.AttRLDel+ VS.SHO.AttRLAdd)*100%

    SHO Performance Analysis


    Cell 54670 Soft handover success rate is below 99%. The failure reason are NoReply and Other reason.

    Site BKC9109U has IP clock failure and SCTP link failure alarm. RAW Counters: VS.SHO.AttRLAdd VS.SHO.AttRLDel VS.SHO.SuccRLAdd VS.SHO.SuccRLDel VS.SHO.Fail.Cell VS.SHO.FailRLAdd.CfgUnsupp VS.SHO.FailRLAdd.ISR VS.SHO.FailRLAdd.InvCfg VS.SHO.FailRLAdd.NoReply VS.SHO.Fail.Other.Cell

    SHO Performance Improvement


    1.The RNC fails to receive response to active set update command for adding/deleting links. This is a major cause to SHO failure. It occurs in areas with weak coverage and small handover area. RF optimization must be performed in the areas. After we check site BKC9109U has IP clock failure and SCTP link failure alarm , we need solve those transmission alarm first.

    Definition of Inter-Frequency Handover KPI


    When the RNC decides to perform inter-frequency hard handover, the RNC sends the message PHYSICAL CHANGEL RECONFIGURATION to UE, and one inter-frequency hard handover attempt in the best cell is increased . When the RNC receives the message PHYSICAL CHANEL RECONFIGURATION COMPLETE from the UE , the inter-frequency hard handover is successful, and one successful inter-frequency hard handover in the best cell is increased. RNC Level: The outgoing inter-frequency hard handover success rate is calculated in the following formula: VS.HHO.InterFreq.Succ.RNC / VS.HHO.InterFreq.Att.RNC*100%
    Cell level: The outgoing inter-frequency hard handover success rate is calculate in the following formula: VS.HHO.SuccInterFreqOut / VS.HHO.AttInterFreqOut*100%

    Inter-Frequency Performance Analysis


    HHO failures main reason due to Uu no reply.
    RAW Counters: VS.HHO.AttInterFreqOut VS.HHO.SuccInterFreqOut VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.CfgUnsupp VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.PyhChFail VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.ISR VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.CellUpdt VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.InvCfg VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.NoReply RAW Counters: VS.CM.DLSF2.Act.Att VS.HHO.AttInterFreqOut VS.HHO.SuccInterFreqOut VS.HHO.AttInterFreqOut.CS VS.HHO.SuccInterFreqOut.CS VS.HHO.AttInterFreqOut.PS VS.HHO.SuccInterFreqOut.PS RAW Counters: VS.HHO.AttInterFreqOut.CS.TrigRscp VS.HHO.AttInterFreqOut.CS.TrigEcNo VS.HHO.AttInterFreqOut.PS.TrigRscp VS.HHO.AttInterFreqOut.PS.TrigEcNo VS.HHO.SuccInterFreqOut.CS.Rscp VS.HHO.SuccInterFreqOut.CS.EcNo VS.HHO.SuccInterFreqOut.PS.Rscp VS.HHO.SuccInterFreqOut.PS.EcNo

    CM is much larger than HHO.

    HHO failures caused by PS service and due to poor Ec/Io.

    Inter-Frequency Performance Improvement


    1.Reduce CM for cell 44222. General Method to Reduce Compress Mode: Modify 2D/2F/2B Threshold Event 2D: Start compress mode Event 2F: Stop compress mode Event 2B: Start Inter Freq handover

    Inter-Frequency Performance Improvement


    Current Setting: No cell level parameters setting;
    SET UINTERFREQHOCOV:PRDREPORTINTERVAL=D500, INTERFREQCSTHD2DECN0=-14, INTERFREQCSTHD2FECN0=12, INTERFREQCSTHD2DRSCP=-95, INTERFREQCSTHD2FRSCP=-92, INTERFREQHTHD2DECN0=-14, INTERFREQR99PSTHD2DECN0=-14, INTERFREQHTHD2FECN0=-12, INTERFREQR99PSTHD2FECN0=-12, INTERFREQHTHD2DRSCP=-95, INTERFREQR99PSTHD2DRSCP=-95, INTERFREQHTHD2FRSCP=-92, INTERFREQR99PSTHD2FRSCP=-92, TARGETFREQHTHDECN0=-12, TARGETFREQR99PSTHDECN0=-12, TARGETFREQHTHDRSCP=-92, TARGETFREQR99PSTHDRSCP=-92, USEDFREQHTHDECN0=-12, USEDFREQR99PSTHDECN0=-12, USEDFREQHTHDRSCP=-92, USEDFREQR99PSTHDRSCP=-92, HYSTFORPRDINTERFREQ=0, TIMETOTRIGFORPRDINTERFREQ=0, INTERFREQREPORTMODE=PERIODICAL_REPORTING, INTERFREQFILTERCOEF=D3, HYSTFOR2D=4, HYSTFOR2F=4, WEIGHTFORUSEDFREQ=0, TIMETOTRIG2D=D320, TIMETOTRIG2F=D1280, TARGETFREQCSTHDECN0=-12, TARGETFREQCSTHDRSCP=-92, USEDFREQCSTHDECN0=-12, USEDFREQCSTHDRSCP=-92, INTERFREQMEASTIME=60, TIMETOINTERFREQHO=0;

    Tuning suggestion : ADD UCELLINTERFREQHOCOV :

    10

    Inter-Frequency Performance Improvement


    2.Change UHOCOMM parameters : no cell level;
    SET UHOCOMM:DIVCTRLFIELD=MAY, HSPATIMERLEN=0, COEXISTMEASTHDCHOICE=COEXIST_MEAS_THD_CHOICE_INTERRAT, MAXEDCHCELLINACTIVESET=3, IFANTIPINGPANGTIMERLENGTH=30;

    Tuning suggestion : ADD UCELHOCOMM :


    ADD UCELLHOCOMM: CellId=44222, InterFreqRATSwitch=INTERFREQ, CoexistMeasThdChoice =COEXIST_MEAS_THD_CHOICE_INTERFREQ, CSServiceHOSwitch=OFF, PSServiceHOSwitch=OFF;

    11

    Definition of Inter-RAT Handover KPI


    During the inter-RAT handover, if the RNC sends the message HANDOVER FROM UTRAN COMMAND or CELL CHANGE ORDER FROM UTRAN, one inter-RAT handover attempt in the best cell is increased. If the message IU RELEASE COMMAND is received and the cause value is Successful Relocation, Normal Release, or Network Optimization, the inter-RAT handover is successful and one successful inter-RAT handover in the best cell is increased. RNC Level: The outgoing inter-RAT handover success rate for CS domain is calculated in the following formula: VS.IRATHO.SuccOutCS.RNC / VS.IRATHO.AttOutCS.RNC *100% The outgoing inter-RAT handover success rate for PS domain is calculated in the following formula: VS.IRATHO.SuccOutPSUTRAN.RNC / VS.IRATHO.AttOutPSUTRAN.RNC *100% Cell Level: The outgoing inter-RAT handover success rate for CS domain is calculated in the following formula: IRATHO.SuccOutCS / IRATHO.AttOutCS *100% The outgoing inter-RAT handover success rate for PS domain is calculated in the following formula: IRATHO.SuccOutPSUTRAN / IRATHO.AttOutPSUTRAN *100%

    12

    Inter-RAT Performance Analysis


    CS 3G2G handover failures main reason due to physical channel fail.
    RAW Counters: IRATHO.AttOutCS IRATHO.SuccOutCS IRATHO.FailOutCS.CfgUnsupp IRATHO.FailOutCS.PhyChFail VS.IRATHO.FailOutCS.NoReply VS.IRATHO.FailOutCS.Abort

    The reason of cell 78 has low CS 3G2G handover success rate due to handover to below yellow colors neighbor cells have so much failures .
    RAW Counters: VS.IRATHO.AttOutCS.Gcell VS.IRATHO.SuccOutCS.Gcell VS.IRATHO.FailOutCS.UEFail.GCell

    13

    Inter-RAT Performance Analysis


    PS 3G2G handover failures main reason due to physical channel fail.
    RAW Counters: IRATHO.AttOutPSUTRAN IRATHO.SuccOutPSUTRAN IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.CfgUnsupp IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.PhyChFail VS.IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.NoReply VS.IRATHO.FailOutPS.Abort

    The reason of cell 44288 has low PS 3G2G handover success rate due to handover to below yellow colors neighbor cells have so much failures .
    RAW Counters: VS.IRATHO.AttOutPSUTRAN.Gcell VS.IRATHO.SuccOutPSUTRAN.Gcell VS.IRATHO.FaiOutPSUTRAN.UEFail.GCell

    14

    Inter-RAT Performance Improvement


    1. Tuning suggestion of cell 78:
    ADD UCELLINTERRATHOCOV:CELLID=78, INTERRATPERIODREPORTINTERVAL=D1000, HYSTFORINTERRAT=0, TIMETOTRIGFORNONVERIFY=0, TIMETOTRIGFORVERIFY=0, INTERRATFILTERCOEF=D3, INTERRATCSTHD2DECN0=-14, INTERRATCSTHD2FECN0=-12, INTERRATCSTHD2DRSCP=-106, INTERRATCSTHD2FRSCP=-101, INTERRATHTHD2DECN0=-24, INTERRATR99PSTHD2DECN0=-24, INTERRATHTHD2FECN0=-13, INTERRATR99PSTHD2FECN0=-13, INTERRATHTHD2DRSCP=-115, INTERRATR99PSTHD2DRSCP=-115, INTERRATHTHD2FRSCP=-107, INTERRATR99PSTHD2FRSCP=-107, INTERRATREPORTMODE=PERIODICAL_REPORTING, FILTERCOEFOF2D2F=D3, WEIGHTFORUSEDFREQ=0, HYSTFOR2D=4, HYSTFOR2F=4, TRIGTIME2D=D640, TRIGTIME2F=D1280, BSICVERIFY=REQUIRED, TARGETRATCSTHD=21, TARGETRATR99PSTHD=21, TARGETRATHTHD=21, INTERRATMEASTIME=60, INTERRATPINGPONGTIMER=0, INTERRATPINGPONGHYST=0, INTERRATPHYCHFAILNUM=3, PENALTYTIMEFORPHYCHFAIL=30;

    Tuning Suggestion:
    MOD UCELLINTERRATHOCOV:CELLID=78, INTERRATPERIODREPORTINTERVAL=D1000, HYSTFORINTERRAT=0, TIMETOTRIGFORNONVERIFY=0, TIMETOTRIGFORVERIFY=0, INTERRATFILTERCOEF=D3, INTERRATCSTHD2DECN0=-14, INTERRATCSTHD2FECN0=-12, INTERRATCSTHD2DRSCP=-100, INTERRATCSTHD2FRSCP=-97, INTERRATHTHD2DECN0=-24, INTERRATR99PSTHD2DECN0=-24, INTERRATHTHD2FECN0=-13, INTERRATR99PSTHD2FECN0=-13, INTERRATHTHD2DRSCP=-115, INTERRATR99PSTHD2DRSCP=-115, INTERRATHTHD2FRSCP=-107, INTERRATR99PSTHD2FRSCP=-107, INTERRATREPORTMODE=PERIODICAL_REPORTING, FILTERCOEFOF2D2F=D3, WEIGHTFORUSEDFREQ=0, HYSTFOR2D=4, HYSTFOR2F=4, TRIGTIME2D=D640, TRIGTIME2F=D1280, BSICVERIFY=REQUIRED, TARGETRATCSTHD=26, TARGETRATR99PSTHD=21, TARGETRATHTHD=21, INTERRATMEASTIME=60, INTERRATPINGPONGTIMER=0, INTERRATPINGPONGHYST=0, INTERRATPHYCHFAILNUM=3, PENALTYTIMEFORPHYCHFAIL=30; MOD U2GNCELL:RNCID=112, CELLID=78, GSMCELLINDEX=1256, BLINDHOFLAG=FALSE, NPRIOFLAG=FALSE, CIOOFFSET=-10, QOFFSET1SN=0, QRXLEVMIN=-45, TPENALTYHCSRESELECT=D0, TEMPOFFSET1=D3, DRDECN0THRESHHOLD=-12, SIB11IND=TRUE, SIB12IND=FALSE, MBDRFLAG=FALSE, MBDRPRIO=0; MOD U2GNCELL:RNCID=112, CELLID=78, GSMCELLINDEX=15378, BLINDHOFLAG=FALSE, NPRIOFLAG=FALSE, CIOOFFSET=-10, QOFFSET1SN=0, QRXLEVMIN=-45, TPENALTYHCSRESELECT=D0, TEMPOFFSET1=D3, DRDECN0THRESHHOLD=-12, SIB11IND=TRUE, SIB12IND=FALSE, MBDRFLAG=FALSE, MBDRPRIO=0;

    15

    Inter-RAT Performance Improvement


    2. Tuning suggestion of cell 44288:
    ADD UCELLINTERRATHOCOV:CELLID=44288, INTERRATPERIODREPORTINTERVAL=D1000, HYSTFORINTERRAT=0, TIMETOTRIGFORNONVERIFY=0, TIMETOTRIGFORVERIFY=0, INTERRATFILTERCOEF=D3, INTERRATCSTHD2DECN0=-14, INTERRATCSTHD2FECN0=-12, INTERRATCSTHD2DRSCP=-106, INTERRATCSTHD2FRSCP=-101, INTERRATHTHD2DECN0=-24, INTERRATR99PSTHD2DECN0=-24, INTERRATHTHD2FECN0=-13, INTERRATR99PSTHD2FECN0=-13, INTERRATHTHD2DRSCP=-115, INTERRATR99PSTHD2DRSCP=-115, INTERRATHTHD2FRSCP=-107, INTERRATR99PSTHD2FRSCP=-107, INTERRATREPORTMODE=PERIODICAL_REPORTING, FILTERCOEFOF2D2F=D3, WEIGHTFORUSEDFREQ=0, HYSTFOR2D=4, HYSTFOR2F=4, TRIGTIME2D=D640, TRIGTIME2F=D1280, BSICVERIFY=REQUIRED, TARGETRATCSTHD=21, TARGETRATR99PSTHD=21, TARGETRATHTHD=21, INTERRATMEASTIME=60, INTERRATPINGPONGTIMER=0, INTERRATPINGPONGHYST=0, INTERRATPHYCHFAILNUM=3, PENALTYTIMEFORPHYCHFAIL=30;

    Tuning Suggestion:
    MOD UCELLINTERRATHOCOV:CELLID=44288, INTERRATPERIODREPORTINTERVAL=D1000, HYSTFORINTERRAT=0, TIMETOTRIGFORNONVERIFY=0, TIMETOTRIGFORVERIFY=0, INTERRATFILTERCOEF=D3, INTERRATCSTHD2DECN0=-14, INTERRATCSTHD2FECN0=-12, INTERRATCSTHD2DRSCP=-106, INTERRATCSTHD2FRSCP=-101, INTERRATHTHD2DECN0=-16, INTERRATR99PSTHD2DECN0=-16, INTERRATHTHD2FECN0=-14, INTERRATR99PSTHD2FECN0=-14, INTERRATHTHD2DRSCP=-115, INTERRATR99PSTHD2DRSCP=-115, INTERRATHTHD2FRSCP=-112, INTERRATR99PSTHD2FRSCP=-112, INTERRATREPORTMODE=PERIODICAL_REPORTING, FILTERCOEFOF2D2F=D3, WEIGHTFORUSEDFREQ=0, HYSTFOR2D=4, HYSTFOR2F=4, TRIGTIME2D=D640, TRIGTIME2F=D1280, BSICVERIFY=REQUIRED, TARGETRATCSTHD=21, TARGETRATR99PSTHD=31, TARGETRATHTHD=31, INTERRATMEASTIME=60, INTERRATPINGPONGTIMER=0, INTERRATPINGPONGHYST=0, INTERRATPHYCHFAILNUM=1, PENALTYTIMEFORPHYCHFAIL=60;

    Thank you

    For being together

    You might also like