Performance Appraisal in TISCO

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 33
At a glance
Powered by AI
The case examines unique HR practices, change and performance management practices, and retention strategies adopted by TISCO.

TISCO implemented programs like TOP and PEP to focus on reducing costs, improving quality and throughput, and shifting focus from volumes to costs. They also adopted modern technologies as recommended by consultants.

Between 1996-2000, TISCO reduced its workforce from 78,000 to 40,000 employees through communication and a performance-based promotion system. They also planned to cut management staff through a new performance management system.

BEST HR PRACTICES

IN
Pradnia Bhalerao C-03
Anandita Singh C-34
Jayashree Prabhu C-43
Sanchi Gaikwad P- 07
Abstract
This case examines :

Unique HR practices.
The change and performance management
practices.
Some of the retention strategies adopted by the
company.
WE ASPIRE TO BE THE
GLOBAL STEEL INDUSTRY
BENCHMARK FOR VALUE
CREATION AND CORPORATE
CITIZENSHIP.
TISCO – UNDER THE
CHANGE
• In the early 1990s, TISCO appointed McKinsey and
Booz-Allen & Hamilton to study its operations and
suggest ways to cut costs.
• To focus on various components affecting the cost
of steel.
• Included cost of raw materials, cost of conversion,
fuel rate in the blast furnace and mining of coal.
• Advised to use the most modern technologies to cut
costs further.
• In the second half of 1998, in association with
McKinsey, TISCO implemented TOP program at
its G blast furnace .
• TOP - Maximum positive impact to the bottom-
line, with minimum investment, required in
minimum time.
• Aimed achieving large improvements in
throughput, quality and cost in the short term.
• In the long run, TOP was expected to enable the
TISCO to achieve high rates of performance
improvement.
• Helped TISCO to shift its focus from just producing
volumes to costs and quality.
• Enabled TISCO to improve customer satisfaction
and loyalty.
• TISCO also took steps to reduce its manpower costs.
• Between 1996 and 2000, TISCO reduced its
workforce from 78,000 to 40,000 employees.
• Cutting its workforce by 38,000 employees was
not an easy job.
• Company was able to do it with a lot of
communication with employees.
• TISCO had adopted Performance Ethic
Programme (PEP).
• It planned to promote hardworking young
people to higher positions depending on their
performance, rather than following the
convention of seniority.
• This exercise was expected to cut the
management staff from 4000 to 3000.
pep
Two core elements -
• Proposed a new organizational structure:
expected to foster growth businesses,
introduce more decision-making flexibility,
clear accountability, and encourage
teamwork among the managers and the
workforce.
• Proposed to introduce a Performance
Management System (PMS).
Objectives of pep
• It would identify and reward strong performers,
and also offer development opportunities for
each employee.
• PMS would also ensure that every employee's
job profile was clearly defined.
• By introducing PMS, TISCO wanted to make
performance appraisals transparent and fair and
reward the good performers.
• The company also planned to introduce a new
compensation package based on performance
from November 2001.
BENEFITS OF PEP
• Youngsters are getting higher salary than
some of the seniors, and after the
restructuring, the average age of the
managers has fallen by 10 years.
• Through PEP, TISCO also reduced the
hierarchical levels from 13 to 5.
• In a bid to reduce costs further, TISCO used
IT as a strategic tool.
• After SAP solutions were introduced in
TISCO, the business processes became
more efficient.
• It also improved customer service and
productivity, and reduced costs.
• The introduction of SAP also decreased
manpower cost from more than US $ 200
per ton in 1998 to about US $ 140 per ton in
2000.
Component 1:
Conventional
Appraisal
Coincides with FY

Preceded by Annual Business Plan

Three components

Three components
The THREE components

Self-appraisal
• The work done
• Difficulties
• Major achievments
• Developmental needs
Objective assessment
• Assesment of KRA’s fulfilment
• Done against concrete goals

Subjective assessment
• In what manner the work is done?
• Decision making
• Managerial capabilities/traits
• Transparent & open

• Rewards, annual increment for promotion,


postings, job rotation are linked with appraisals

• Feedback but tool for administrative decision


making
Component ii:
MANAGERIAL
STYLE FEEDBACK
How it started ?
• Subordinate must get chance to
assess their bosses.
• Started with critical group –
divisional managers and higher.
Procedure
• HR dept. selects who will give the
feedback.
• Random sampling.
• Managerial Style feedback Questionnaire.
• Identity of people giving feedback is kept
confidential.
• All data is collected, analyzed.
Managerial style
feedback ??
• Subordinates – did not have
expertise or wisdom
• Confidentiality
• Perception
Advantages
• Johari Window - Blind
• the boss get a reflection of what his
employees think about him
• Management Style
Component iii:
INTERNAL
CUSTOMERS
ASSESSMENT
Internal Customer Assessment

• TISCO extended their feedback system.


• Evaluate to what extent one meets the
expectations of internal customers
• Provide peers with third set of data
Sample of appraisers
Procedure:
• List of 15- 20 from a wide set of
functions
• The HR dept.
• Work on appraisers & merge the list
• Again pick random sample each year of
10- 12 names
Contd…
• Separate questionnaire is developed
• 10 questions
• Space for writing open ended responses
• Anonymous feedback
• Summarizing of report
• Report goes back to an individual in
detailed form
Contd..
Observations :
• Assessment by subordinate is tougher than
the assessment by peers & colleagues
• Some bosses are assessed very stringently
by subordinates but far more positively by
their peers & colleagues
• This process goes up to CEO level & he too
goes through entire process
Observation & Learning
TISCO chose to do three components
separately
Sequence
Time gaps
Anonymity is practiced
Counseling people
Contd..
• Problems in dropout rate
• Feedback is taken seriously
CONCLUSION
bibliography
• Performance Management & Appraisal
System – HR Tools for Global
Competitiveness – By T.V. Rao.
• www.icmrindia.com
• www.tisco.com
THANK YOU

You might also like