Ship stability calculations have evolved greatly over hundreds of years. Originally based on simple rule-of-thumb methods, the advent of ship model testing basins and computational tools now allow for more complex analysis. While ship design was traditionally adapted incrementally from prior generations, today changes can be tested using models and simulations before being implemented. The introduction of transverse and longitudinal bulkheads in the mid-1800s increased ship survivability by containing flooding to breached compartments. Modern ships additionally include cross-flooding systems to control heeling and stress on the vessel's structure if damaged.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views1 page
History: Towing Tank Newcastle University
Ship stability calculations have evolved greatly over hundreds of years. Originally based on simple rule-of-thumb methods, the advent of ship model testing basins and computational tools now allow for more complex analysis. While ship design was traditionally adapted incrementally from prior generations, today changes can be tested using models and simulations before being implemented. The introduction of transverse and longitudinal bulkheads in the mid-1800s increased ship survivability by containing flooding to breached compartments. Modern ships additionally include cross-flooding systems to control heeling and stress on the vessel's structure if damaged.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1
History
A model yacht being tested in the towing tank of Newcastle University
Ship stability, as it pertains to naval architecture, has existed for hundreds of years. Historically, ship stability calculations for ships relied on rule of thumb calculations, often tied to a specific system of measurement. Some of these very old equations continue to be used in naval architecture books today. However, the advent of the ship model basin allows much more complex analysis. Master shipbuilders of the past used a system of adaptive and variant design. Ships were often copied from one generation to the next with only minor changes being made, and by doing this, serious problems were not often encountered. Ships today still use the process of adaptation and variation that has been used for hundreds of years; however computational fluid dynamics, ship model testing and a better overall understanding of fluid and ship motions has allowed much more in-depth analysis. Transverse and longitudinal waterproof bulkheads were introduced in ironclad designs between 1860 and the 1880s, anti-collision bulkheads having been made compulsory in British steam merchant ships prior to 1860. [1] Prior to this, a hull breach in any part of a vessel could flood the entire length of the ship. Transverse bulkheads, while expensive, increase the likelihood of ship survival in the event of damage to the hull by limiting flooding to breached compartments separated by bulkheads from undamaged ones. Longitudinal bulkheads have a similar purpose, but damaged stability effects must be taken into account to eliminate excessive heeling. Today, most ships have means to equalize the water in sections port and starboard (cross flooding), which helps to limit the stresses experienced by the structure and also to alter the heel and/or trim of the ship.