Functionalism is less popular today than in the 1950s due to its inability to explain diversity and conflict. Criticisms of functionalism include that it overemphasizes consensus and order while failing to explain social conflicts, it ignores individual freedom of choice and presents an oversocialized view of humans, and its view of socialization as always successful cannot explain real social problems like delinquency and drug use. Finally, functionalism is accused of ignoring unequal power distributions in society.
Functionalism is less popular today than in the 1950s due to its inability to explain diversity and conflict. Criticisms of functionalism include that it overemphasizes consensus and order while failing to explain social conflicts, it ignores individual freedom of choice and presents an oversocialized view of humans, and its view of socialization as always successful cannot explain real social problems like delinquency and drug use. Finally, functionalism is accused of ignoring unequal power distributions in society.
Functionalism is less popular today than in the 1950s due to its inability to explain diversity and conflict. Criticisms of functionalism include that it overemphasizes consensus and order while failing to explain social conflicts, it ignores individual freedom of choice and presents an oversocialized view of humans, and its view of socialization as always successful cannot explain real social problems like delinquency and drug use. Finally, functionalism is accused of ignoring unequal power distributions in society.
Functionalism is less popular today than in the 1950s due to its inability to explain diversity and conflict. Criticisms of functionalism include that it overemphasizes consensus and order while failing to explain social conflicts, it ignores individual freedom of choice and presents an oversocialized view of humans, and its view of socialization as always successful cannot explain real social problems like delinquency and drug use. Finally, functionalism is accused of ignoring unequal power distributions in society.
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Criticisms Of Funtionalism
Functionalism is far less popular in sociology today than it
was in the 1950's. Part of its decline in popularity is probably linked to the problems it had attempting to explain all the diersity and con!ict that existed from the 19"0s onwards. #riticism of functionalism had been widespread. Functionalism has been criticised for oer$emphasising consensus and order% and failing to explain the social con!icts that characterise the modern world. &e see ery clear di'erences in behaiour all around us eeryday% and there may be clear cultural di'erences present in the same society. (ome Functionalists hae attempted to explain this by reference to subculture. )his can be de*ned as a way of life subscribed to by a signi*cant minority who may share some general alues and norms with large culture% but who may be in opposition to others. Functionalism has also been accused of ignoring the freedom of choice en+oyed by indiiduals. People choose what to do $ they do what makes sense to them. )heir behaiour and ideas are not imposed on them by structural factors beyond their control. ,n this sense% functionalism may present 'an oer$socialised' picture of human beings. )here may also be problems in the way functionalists iew socialisation as a postie process that neer fails. ,f this were the case then delin-uency% child abuse and illegal drug taking would not be the social problems they are. Finally% functionalism has been accused by .arxists of ignoring the fact that power is not e-ually distributed in society. (ome groups hae more wealth and power than others and may be able to impose thier norms and alues on less powerful groups. )he nest few topics focus on this process.