Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    #43 Toyota MPC Vs Toyota Mpu

    Uploaded by

    Pilyang Sweet
    The Toyota Motor Phil. Corp Labor Union filed a petition for a certification election to represent all rank-and-file employees of Toyota Motor Corp. Toyota Motor Corp argued that the election should be denied for two reasons: 1) the union was still in the process of registration and was not a legitimate labor organization, and 2) the union was composed of both rank-and-file and supervisory employees in violation of law. The Med-Arbiter dismissed the petition in favor of Toyota Motor Corp's arguments. However, the Secretary of Labor overturned this decision and ordered the election, arguing the union was a legitimate organization based on its registration certificate. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Toyota Motor Corp, finding that a union composed

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    #43 Toyota MPC Vs Toyota Mpu

    Uploaded by

    Pilyang Sweet
    43 views2 pages
    The Toyota Motor Phil. Corp Labor Union filed a petition for a certification election to represent all rank-and-file employees of Toyota Motor Corp. Toyota Motor Corp argued that the election should be denied for two reasons: 1) the union was still in the process of registration and was not a legitimate labor organization, and 2) the union was composed of both rank-and-file and supervisory employees in violation of law. The Med-Arbiter dismissed the petition in favor of Toyota Motor Corp's arguments. However, the Secretary of Labor overturned this decision and ordered the election, arguing the union was a legitimate organization based on its registration certificate. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Toyota Motor Corp, finding that a union composed

    Original Description:

    LABREL

    Original Title

    #43 Toyota Mpc vs Toyota Mpu

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Toyota Motor Phil. Corp Labor Union filed a petition for a certification election to represent all rank-and-file employees of Toyota Motor Corp. Toyota Motor Corp argued that the election should be denied for two reasons: 1) the union was still in the process of registration and was not a legitimate labor organization, and 2) the union was composed of both rank-and-file and supervisory employees in violation of law. The Med-Arbiter dismissed the petition in favor of Toyota Motor Corp's arguments. However, the Secretary of Labor overturned this decision and ordered the election, arguing the union was a legitimate organization based on its registration certificate. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Toyota Motor Corp, finding that a union composed

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    43 views2 pages

    #43 Toyota MPC Vs Toyota Mpu

    Uploaded by

    Pilyang Sweet
    The Toyota Motor Phil. Corp Labor Union filed a petition for a certification election to represent all rank-and-file employees of Toyota Motor Corp. Toyota Motor Corp argued that the election should be denied for two reasons: 1) the union was still in the process of registration and was not a legitimate labor organization, and 2) the union was composed of both rank-and-file and supervisory employees in violation of law. The Med-Arbiter dismissed the petition in favor of Toyota Motor Corp's arguments. However, the Secretary of Labor overturned this decision and ordered the election, arguing the union was a legitimate organization based on its registration certificate. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Toyota Motor Corp, finding that a union composed

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    #43

    TOYOTA MOTOR PHIL. CORP vs. TOYOTA MOTOR PHIL. CORP LABOR UNION
    (1997)
    FACTS:
    Toyota Motor Phil Corp. Labor Union filed a petition for certification
    election with Dept. of Labor, for all rank-and- file employees of the
    petitioner Toyota Motor Corp.
    file employees of the petitioner
    Toyota Motor Corp.Petitioner seek the denial of the holding of thecertifica
    tion election on 2 grounds:
    (1) the union, being process of registration had no legal personality
    to file the same as it was not a legitimate labor organization at the
    time the petition was file; and
    (2) that the union was composed of both rank and-file and supervisory
    employees in the violation of the law. The Med-Arbiterdismissed the
    petition
    for
    certification
    election
    in
    favour
    with the grounds stated by petitioner. However, on
    appeal,
    the
    Secretary of Labor set aside the decision of the Med-Arbiter and
    ordered the holding of the certification election contending that the
    union was already a legitimate labor organization at the time of the
    filing of the petition evidenced by a certification of registration.
    Issue:
    Whether the Secretary of Labor committed grave abuse of discretion in
    directing the certification election
    Held: YES. Petition Granted.
    A labor organization composed of both rank-and-file and supervisory
    employees is no labor organization at all. It cannot, for any guise or
    purpose,
    be
    a
    legitimate
    labororganization. Not being one, an organization whichcarries a mixture
    of rank-and-file and supervisoryemployees cannot possess any of the right
    s of alegitimate labor organization, including the right to file a
    petition for certification election for the purpose of collective bargaining.
    In the given case, as respondent union's membership list contains the
    names
    of
    at
    least
    27
    supervisory
    employeesin Level Five positions, the union could not, prior topurging
    itself of its supervisory employee members, attain the status of a
    legitimate labor organization. Not being one, it cannot possess the
    requisite personality to file a petition for certification election. The union's
    composition being in violation of the Labor Code's Prohibition of unions
    composed
    of
    supervisory
    and
    rank-and-file
    employees,
    itcould not possess the requisite personality to file forrecognition
    as
    a
    legitimate labor organization.

    You might also like