Polyaspartic Webinar Protective and Marine
Polyaspartic Webinar Protective and Marine
Polyaspartic Webinar Protective and Marine
Agenda
Marine Applications
Gen II Polyaspartic Improvements
Disclaimer
Polyaspartic Coatings
H N
R N C N
Isocyanate Aspartate
Aliphatic Urea
O
R N C O
OH
R N
OR
Isocyanate
Polyol
Urethane
Polyaspartic Features
Fast cure with potlife
Low VOC
High Solids
Corrosion resistance
Spray, brush, or roll
Properties
PAE 1
PAE 2
PAE 3
PAE 4
% Solids
100
100
100
90 (BuAc)
Eq. Wt.
229
277
291
323
cps @ 25C
100 max
900-2000
800-2000
110-200
Reactivity
High
Mid-high
Low
Low
Gel Time1
< 5 min
12-120 min
8-24 hrs
8-24 hrs
APHA Color
<250
<250
<250
<100
Resin
cps as supplied
PAE 1
PAE 2
PAE 3
100 max
900-2000
800-2000
cps @ 75%
Weight Solids
~15
~18
~18
Aliphatic Polyisocyanates
Co-reactants for Polyaspartic Esters
Solid content
approx. [%]
(solvent)
NCO-content
approx. [%]
Viscosity 23 C
approx. [mPas]
HDI Biuret
HDI Biuret
HDI Biuret
HDI Trimer
HDI Trimer
HDI Trimer
HDI Dimer
HDI Allophanate
HDI Prepolymer
100
75 (MPA/X)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
22.0
16.5
23.0
21.5
23.0
23.5
21.8
19.4
11.0
10000
250
2500
2500
1200
730
150
450
6000
HDI / IPDI
Prepolymer
86 (BA)
10.2
2000
Type
NCO
functionality
Low functionality:
2.0 < F < 2.8
Medium functionality: 2.8 < F < 3.6
High functionality:
F >3.6
Viscosity, functionality and % NCO affect pot life and cure speed
% RH
Humidity
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
1.95
1.85
1.76
1.66
1.56
1.46
1.37
1.27
1.17
1.07
0.98
0.88
0.78
0.68
0.59
0.49
0.39
0.29
0.20
0.10
30
2.38
2.26
2.14
2.02
1.90
1.79
1.67
1.55
1.43
1.31
1.19
1.07
0.95
0.83
0.71
0.60
0.48
0.36
0.24
0.12
35
2.86
2.72
2.57
2.43
2.29
2.15
2.00
1.86
1.72
1.57
1.43
1.29
1.14
1.00
0.86
0.72
0.57
0.43
0.29
0.14
40
3.44
3.27
3.10
2.92
2.75
2.58
2.41
2.24
2.06
1.89
1.72
1.55
1.38
1.20
1.03
0.86
0.69
0.52
0.34
0.17
45
4.11
3.90
3.70
3.49
3.29
3.08
2.88
2.67
2.47
2.26
2.06
1.85
1.64
1.44
1.23
1.03
0.82
0.62
0.41
0.21
50
4.89
4.65
4.40
4.16
3.91
3.67
3.42
3.18
2.93
2.69
2.45
2.20
1.96
1.71
1.47
1.22
0.98
0.73
0.49
0.24
55
5.80
5.51
5.22
4.93
4.64
4.35
4.06
3.77
3.48
3.19
2.90
2.61
2.32
2.03
1.74
1.45
1.16
0.87
0.58
0.29
60
6.85
6.51
6.17
5.82
5.48
5.14
4.80
4.45
4.11
3.77
3.43
3.08
2.74
2.40
2.06
1.71
1.37
1.03
0.69
0.34
65
Temperature
8.10
7.70
7.29
6.89
6.48
6.08
5.67
5.27
4.86
4.46
4.05
3.65
3.24
2.84
2.43
2.03
1.62
1.22
0.81
0.41
70
9.45
8.98
8.51
8.03
7.56
7.09
6.62
6.14
5.67
5.20
4.73
4.25
3.78
3.31
2.84
2.36
1.89
1.42
0.95
0.47
75
11.04
10.49
9.94
9.38
8.83
8.28
7.73
7.18
6.62
6.07
5.52
4.97
4.42
3.86
3.31
2.76
2.21
1.66
1.10
0.55
80
12.87
12.23
11.58
10.94
10.30
9.65
9.01
8.37
7.72
7.08
6.44
5.79
5.15
4.50
3.86
3.22
2.57
1.93
1.29
0.64
85
14.94
14.19
13.45
12.70
11.95
11.21
10.46
9.71
8.96
8.22
7.47
6.72
5.98
5.23
4.48
3.74
2.99
2.24
1.49
0.75
90
17.28
16.42
15.55
14.69
13.82
12.96
12.10
11.23
10.37
9.50
8.64
7.78
6.91
6.05
5.18
4.32
3.46
2.59
1.73
0.86
95
19.95
18.95
17.96
16.96
15.96
14.96
13.97
12.97
11.97
10.97
9.98
8.98
7.98
6.98
5.99
4.99
3.99
2.99
2.00
1.00
100
Polyaspartic
Primer
Midcoat
Finish Coat
Scribe
Undercut
Reinforced
Inorganic Zinc
Phenalkamine
Acrylic
Polyurethane
1 mm
Organic Zinc
Epoxy Polyamide
Acrylic
Polyurethane
1 mm
Reinforced
Inorganic Zinc
None
Polyaspartic
1.5 mm
Organic Zinc
None
Polyaspartic
1 mm
Data from a recent article published in JPCL 2013 authored by Mike ODonoghue, Vijay Datta, Stan Walker, Terry Wiseman,
Peter Roberts, and Norb Repman
~30% Savings in
time and labor
Coating
System
Material
Usage
Labor
Usage
DTM
Polyaspartic
36 Gallons
10.5 Hours
2-Coat
Epoxy/
Urethane
35 Gallons
15.5 Hours
Polyaspartic
topcoat
Primer
Page 26
Generation II Polyaspartics
Gen II polyaspartics engineering performance
Gen II
95F / 90% RH
77F / 88% RH
72F / 50% RH
Gen I
10
20
30
Minutes
40
50
60
Gen II
Gen I
Gen II
Gen I
Gen II
Weight Volume
Weight Volume Solids Solids
Property
Component I
Desmophen
NH 1420
PAE
2
Desmophen
NH 1520
PAE
3
Aldimine
Byk-306
Byk-A 530
Ektapro EEP
SubTotal I
15.24
1.73
15.24
1.73
30.49
3.47
30.49
3.47
6.10
0.84
6.10
0.84
0.37
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.74
0.11
0.04
0.00
8.30
1.05
61.25
7.24
51.92
Component II
HDI
TrimerN-3900
Desmodur
38.75
4.04
SubTotal II
38.75
100.00
Total
Dry time
4 hours
Working Time /
Potlife
5-10 minutes
30 minutes
6.04
Taber
60 mg loss
38.75
4.04
~98% retention
4.04
38.75
4.04
11.28
90.67
10.08
Tensile
~5000 psi
Elongation
~5%
No marking
Theoretical Results
Weight Solids 90.67 Wt/Gal
8.87
Volume Solids 89.38 Mix Ratio (volume) 1.79 : 1
P/B
0 NCO:OH
1.07
PVC
0 Theoretical VOC
0.83
Page 34
4 hours
Working Time /
Potlife
10-15 minutes
30-40 minutes
Taber
80 mg loss
PAE 2
PAE 3
HDI/IPDI PP
HDI Trimer
Page 35
~3500 psi
Elongation
~3%
No marking
Dry time
4 hours
Dry time
4 hours
Working Time /
Potlife
5-10 minutes
30 minutes
Working Time /
Potlife
10-15 minutes
40 minutes
Taber
60 mg loss
Taber
80 mg loss
~98% retention
Tensile
~5000 psi
Tensile
~3500 psi
Elongation
~5%
Elongation
~3%
No marking
No marking
Page 36
Final Points
Proven performance
High throughput
More robust Gen II
Acknowledgements
Ahren Olsen
Kurt Best
Thomas Baeker
QUESTIONS?
Mike Jeffries
[email protected]
412-777-4950
Light
Duty 15%
Heavy
Duty 75%
Page 41
Page 42
12 mils white
polyaspartic top coat
Aromatic polyurea liner
Completed in 1996
Remains in service
Tire Preparation
Wet Sample
Soaked in 140F, 2 hrs
Dry Sample
Baked at 140F, 2 hrs
Tire Type
High Performance P
Normal -C
Wet Sample
Dry Sample
Duration 2 hrs
Control - Before
Control - After