(PC) Fossinger v. Brown Et Al - Document No. 4
(PC) Fossinger v. Brown Et Al - Document No. 4
(PC) Fossinger v. Brown Et Al - Document No. 4
12 DANNY FOSSINGER,
14 vs.
16 Defendants. ORDER
17 /
18 Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42
19 U.S.C. § 1983.
20 A civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, must be brought in “(1) a
21 judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a
22 judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim
23 occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a
24 judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action
26 /////
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:07-cv-02679-GEB-EFB Document 4 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
1 Here, most defendants are located in Los Angeles, and the claim arose in Los Angeles,
2 California which is in the Central District of California. 28 U.S.C. § 84(c). Therefore, in the
3 interest of justice, this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central
4 District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C.
5 Cir. 1974).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26