Blended Bersin
Blended Bersin
Blended Bersin
May 2003
May 2003
This approach was used by many companies when rolling out ERP application training.
An initial conference call and series of meetings was used to explain the project and why
the new system is so important then the users took an online course then there was a
follow-up meeting and evaluation by the manager before the system was actually rolled
out.
3. Each media type has its own strengths and weaknesses.
To make blended learning more powerful, you can start looking at all the media as
options: classroom training, web-based training, webinars, CD-ROM courses, video,
EPSS systems, and simulations. Other media which is less exciting but just as important
includes books, job aids, conference calls, documents, and PowerPoint slides.
One lesson we learned is that the highest impact programs (such as the training program
provided for new sales reps at British Telecom) blend a more complex media with one or
more of the simpler media. A web-based course for introduction followed by a real
hands-on interactive class is an obvious mix.
Some of the questions you should ask when selecting media are shown below:
May 2003
In fact, from this research we developed a media selection guide which can help
companies identify which media to use for a given problem.
How to
Design
and
Architect
your
Blended
Learning
Program
Media
Selection
Guide
Media Type
Instructional
Value
Scalability
Time to
Develop
Cost to
Develop
Cost to
Deploy
Assessment
Capable
Trackable
Classroom
based training
High
Low
3-6 weeks
Medium
High
Medium
Low
WBT Courseware
High
High
4-20 weeks
High
Low
High
High
CD ROM
Courseware
High
High
6-20 weeks
High
Medium
High
Low
Conference
Calls
Low
Medium
0-2 weeks
Low
Low
No
No
Webinars
Medium
Medium
3-6 weeks
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Software /
Online Simulations
Very High
Medium
8-20 weeks
High
Medium
High
High
Lab-based
Simulations
Very High
Low
3-6 weeks
High
High
Medium
Medium
Job Aids
Low
High
0-3 weeks
Low
Low
None
None
Web Pages
Low
High
1-8 weeks
Low
Low
None
None
Web Sites
Low
High
1-8 weeks
Low
Low
None
None
Mentors
Medium
Low
2-3 weeks
High
High
Low
Low
ChatDiscussionCommunity
Services
Medium
Low Medium
4-6 weeks
Medium
Medium
None
Low
Video (VCR
or Online)
High
Medium
6-20 weeks
High
High
None
Low
EPSS
Medium
Medium
8-20 weeks
Medium
Medium
None
Medium
page 3
May 2003
May 2003
Each of these questions can be thorny. But you cannot hope to answer these questions
rationally without understanding what business cost, benefit, and processes you need to
be successful.
5. Technology is not as easy or ubiquitous as people think.
Here is an amazing fact. Nearly every company we talked to told us about many
technology hurdles they had to overcome. In the process diagram above, in step 3 we
identify how companies implement infrastructure. Infrastructure is very problematic in
most corporations.
Some of the places which can trip you up include:
Some learners do not have high bandwidth connectivity because they are in
foreign countries or remote locations therefore some content will not run.
PCs each have different browser versions and plugins, so content standards must
be set which specify browser version, plugins, bandwidth, memory, and cpu speed
needed.
LMS systems are expensive and complex to implement, and if you rely on LMSdriven features for your program you may find that some are missing (i.e.
Assessments for example)
When you deploy a large program you have to be ready for massive throughput in
a short period of time.
May 2003
May 2003
7. Blended learning does not have to cost Millions. You can build your own content.
Another interesting finding. Many companies outsource major e-learning projects and
sometimes spend millions of dollars. One of our research companies spent millions of
dollars creating a business simulation which trained financial professionals how to use
new accounting principles. In this particular case, the problem was global and the cost
of failure was very high so it was worth the cost. If you have a very large audience and
a very big problem, you can cost-justify a lot of money on content.
(The simple cost equation for blended learning is the tradeoff between development cost
and delivery cost. For web-based training, for example, high development costs can be
amortized by low delivery costs if the audience is large. For classroom training, lower
development costs and higher delivery costs are justified when the audience is small.)
However in most cases what we found was the opposite. Companies are now developing
web-based content for $100s per instructor hour (we used to charge $30-70,000 per
instructor hour in my prior life!). How do they do this? They often hire a vendor to
teach them how to build courseware then they get a small team together (3-4 people)
and build the content internally. This appears to be a major trend.
May 2003
Scale: You can roll out a new initiative or program to global audiences and reach
more people than ever possible before. This is the promise of e-learning and it is
true.
Speed: If you need to train people within months, you can reach thousands of
people simultaneously. Although there is a fixed time to develop content, the
time to deploy is fast. If the business problem is NOW and the content will
become stale, blended learning is the answer.
Throughput: If your training problem is bottlenecked (one telecommunications
company had such a backlog of training that technicians were driving around in
May 2003
Bottom line: Blended Learning is here to say. I believe it is the natural evolution of elearning understanding the business problem and selecting the right portfolio of
technologies and processes to drive impact. As companies focus on understanding the
processes of blending media, they will find that e-learning is more powerful than they
ever though.
Appendix: companies included in the study include:
Company
Business Challenge
Industry
Audience Size
LMS
Major Vendors
Mix
Siemens
Company Transformation
Manufacturing
10,000
No LMS
Accenture
Tellabs
Manufacturing
450
Docent
RWD
Roche
Pharmaceuticals
1,800
I-Academy
RWD
WBT, ILT
WW Grainger
Distribution
5,000
Saba
RWD
Software
1,100
Saba
Saba
British Telecom
Telecomm
260
Docent
Accenture
Royal Sun
Insurance
1,500
Saba
Saba
WBT, ILT
Kinkos
Retail
20,000
Saba
Saba
WBT
Cisco
Manufacturing
860,000
Intellinex
EMC
Manufacturing
Verizon
Telecomm
NCR
Chip Manufacturer
Manufacturing Training
Manufacturing
Telecomm
42,000 Technomedia
NETg
Peoplesoft
Novell
Software
Manufacturing
NETg
Macromedia
1,000
Saba
Edcor
Simulations
NETg
10
May 2003
11
May 2003