A.

Set Theory and Logic: Fundamental Concepts

(Notes by Dr. J. Santos)

A.1. Primitive Concepts. In mathematics, the notion of a set is a primitive

notion. That is, we admit, as a starting point, the existence of certain objects
(which we call sets), which we wont dene, but which we assume satisfy some
basic properties, which we express as axioms. In other words, we wont describe
what a set is, we will describe what can be done with sets.
Intuitivelly, a set is a collection of objects of any kind, which we call the elements
of a set. The second primitive notion of set theory is the notion of belonging. We
write x X meaning x belongs to the set X, or x is an element of X (Tipically
we use capital letters to designate sets and small letters to designate elements of a
set).
The rst axiom of set theory is
Axiom 1a. A set is determined by its elements
Remark 1. It is important to notice that this axiom is a non trivial assertion about
belonging. To understand this consider an analogous situation in which we consider
human beings in the place of sets and elements, and x A means x is an ancestor
of A. Then clearly A is not determined by its ancestors.
So to describe a set we only need to list its elements. For example, if we have
three objects a, b, c, the set whose elements are precisely a, b, c is denoted by {a, b, c}.
Remark 2. We should point out that the existence of the set {a, b, c} is not a
given. It is rather a consequence of other axioms of set theory, concerned with the
existence of sets. This is not the place, however, to go into those matters so we will
just assume that every set we talk about exists.
Other examples of sets are
(1) Z is the set of integers 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, . . .
(2) Z+ is the set of positive integers 1, 2, 3, 4, . . .

(3) Q is the set of rational numbers 1, 12 , 3, 1

5 , etc.

(4) R is the set of real numbers 2, , 2, e, 32

, etc.
A.2. Designations and Sentences. 7, 3 + 4, {3, 4}, Z, R are all examples of what
we call designations. Designations are names used to refer to mathematical objects:
numbers, points, geometric gures, sets and their elements, etc. Observe that 7 and
3 + 4 refer to the same object; we indicate
this fact by writing 7 = 3 + 4.
7 = 3 + 4, 4 4, 2 + 1 < 1 + 2, 2 Z are all examples of what we call
sentences. Sentences express statements pertaining to the mathematical objects.
These statements can be either true or false. For example the rst two sentences
are true, and the last two sentences are false.
Exercise 1. Which of the following sentences are true?
1 = {1}, 1 {1}, {1} 1, {1} {1}
True and false are called the logical values of a sentence. Two sentences are
said to be equivalent if they have the same logical value. For example, the following
sentences are equivalent:
7 0, (2)5 = 25

A.2

To indicate that two sentences designated by, say, the symbols p and q are
equivalent, we write p q. We also say with the same meaning that p if and only
if q. Following a common practice, we will often abreviate if and only if to i.
Notice that p q is itself a sentence: it is true when p and q have the same
logical value, and false when they have dierent values.
Using the notion of equivalence of sentences we may rewrite the rst axiom as
Axiom 1b. Consider two sets A and B. Then A = B if and only if x A x B.
A.3. Operations on sets. Given two sets U, V , a natural thing to do is to join
the elements of U and V into a single set:
Denition 1 (Union of two sets). Let U, V be sets. The union of U and V , U V ,
is the set whose elements x are characterized by
x U V (x U or x V )
For example {1, Z} {Z, 2} = {1, Z, 2}.
We should stop here to clarify the meaning of or, which is somehow ambiguous
in everyday language. If p and q are sentences then p or q means that at least one
of the given sentences p, q is true. Hence, the sentence p or q is only false if both
p and q are false.
Other natural way of building a set is to consider the elements common to both
sets U and V :
Denition 2 (Intersection of Two Sets). We dene the intersection of two sets
U, V , and write U V , as the set whose elements are characterized by
x U V x U and x V
For example {R, {1}} {{1}, 2} = {{1}}.
The meaning of and is the usual one in everyday language: If p and q are
sentences then p and q means that both p and q are true.
If A and B have no elements in common then A B is a set with no elements:
Denition 3. The empty set, , is the set containing no elements (hence the
sentence x is always false). By the rst axiom there is only one such set. If two
sets A, B have no common elements, that is if A B = , they are called disjoint.
Proposition 1. Let A be any set. Then
(1) A = ;
(2) A = A.
Proof.
(1) By axiom 1b, (A = ) (x A and x x ). So we want to
show that the sentence (x A and x ) x is true.
Since x is false, we get the sentence x A and False False which
is a true sentence.
(2) Now we want to show that (x A or x ) x A is a true sentence.
We have two cases:
(a) x A is true. Then we get True or False True which is a true
sentence.
(b) x A is false. Then we get False or False False which is also a
true sentence.
This concludes the proof.

A.3

Exercise 2. Show that

(1) A A = A;
(2) A A = A.
A.4. Subsets.
Denition 4. We say U is a subset of V (and write U V ) when its elements are
also elements of V :
U V (if x U then x V )
Again, we should stop to clarify the meaning of the words if then . Given
two sentences p, q, the sentence if p then q (often denoted by p q) is only false
when p is true and q is false. So, for example, among the sentences
2 2 3 > 2 + 1, 3 = 2 5 < 0, 3 = 2 5 0
only the rst is false.
Proposition 2. Given sets A, B we have
(1) A;
(2) A A;
(3) A B A;
(4) A A B;
(5) If A B and B C then A C.
Proof. Proofs of p q usually proceed as follows: when p is false the sentence is
automatically true so we begin by assuming that p is true. From this we derive
then that q is also true.
(1) We have to show that x x A is true. Since x is false we are
done.
(2) We have to show that x A x A. Assume the left hand side, x A,
is true. We want to show the right hand side, x A, is also true. This is
clearly the case.
(3) We have to show that (x A and x B) x A. Assume both x A
and x B are true. We want to show that x A is true. Thats clearly
the case.
(4) We have to show that x A (x A or x B). Assume x A is true.
We want to show x A or x B is true, that is, at least one of them is
true. This is the case since x A is true.
(5) We want to show that

(x A x B) and (x B x C) = (x A
x C)
So we assume the following two sentences are true
i. x A x B
ii. x B x C
Now we want to show that x A x C so we assume that
iii. x A
is true and try to prove that x C is true. Now i. and iii. together show
that x B is true and this together with ii. shows that x C is true, as
desired.
This nishes the proof

A.4

A.5. Proving equivalences. Almost all proofs of equivalence of two sentences p, q

are divided into two steps: rst to show that p q and second to show that q p.
This procedure uses the following result:
Exercise 3. Show that
(p q) and (q p) (p q)
In the same way, most proofs of equality betwen two sets A, B are done by rst
showing that A B and then showing that B A:
Exercise 4. Show that
A = B (A B and B A)
As an example of this procedure we will prove the following
Proposition 3. Given sets X, Y we have
X Y X Y = X
Proof. We divide the proof into two steps:
(1) We begin by showing that (X Y = X) = X Y . So we assume that
X Y = X and we want to show that X Y .
We saw in proposition 2 that X Y Y . Since X Y = X it follows
that X Y .
(2) Now we will show that X Y = X Y = X. Assume X Y . We want
to show that X Y = X. Well do it in two steps:
(a) X Y X was already proven in proposition 2.
(b) To show that X X Y let x X. Then, since X Y , it follows
that x Y . Since x is an element of both X and Y , it follows that
xX Y.
This concludes the proof.

Exercise 5. Show that

(1) A (B C) = (A B) (A C);
(2) A (B C) = (A B) (A C);
(3) A B A B = B.
A.6. Negation. If p is a sentence then the negation of p, not p, is the sentence
that states that p is false. Thus, not p and p have always dierent logic values.
b for not a = b, x
/ X for not x X and A B
We use the designations a =
for not A B.
One very useful result is the following:
Exercise 6. Show that
(p q) (not q) (not p)
This formula is quite handy since sometimes it is much easier to prove the right
hand side than it is to prove the left hand side. It is thus important to know how
to negate sentences. We have the following properties (known as De Morgan laws):
Exercise 7. Show that
(1) not (p and q) (not p) or (not q)
(2) not (p or q) (not p) and (not q)

A.5

The corresponding rule for the implication is

Exercise 8. Show that
not (p q) p and (not q)
Closely associated with negation is the dierence of sets:
Denition 5. We dene the dierence of two sets U, V , and write U V , as the
set whose elements are characterized by
x U V x U and x
/V
To better express the relationship betwen negation and dierence of sets we will
introduce the notion of universal set. Very often it happens that we can x a set
E such that all the sets we are considering are subsets of E. This set is then called
the universal set. It is then often useful to refer to the set of all the subsets of E:
Denition 6. Given a set E, the collection of all the subsets of E forms a set,
denoted by P (E) or 2E . This set is called the power set of E. We thus have
A P (E) A E
Exercise 9. Show that P (E) P (F ) = P (E F ) and P (E) P (F ) P (E F ).
In this special case, we use a special notation for the complement: E A = Ac .
Then, x Ac x E and x
/ A. In this context, x E is always a true sentence,
hence x Ac x
/ A. Then from the rules for the negation of sentences we can
derive several identities:
Exercise 10. Show that
(1) A B = A B c
(2) (Ac )c = A

(3) A B B c Ac

(4) c = E, E c =
(5) A Ac = , A Ac = E
(6) (A B)c = Ac B c
(7) (A B)c = Ac B c
A.7. Expressions with Variables. In mathematical language it is frequent the
use of expressions which depend on one or more variables, that is, symbols (usualy
letters) which can be substituted by elements of a certain set. For example, consider
the expressions
x, (x y)2 , x2 2xy + y 2
where x, y can be subsituted by elements of the set of real numbers R. Now consider
the sentences
x2 > 0, 2x = x2 , x2 y 2 = 0, x y > y z
with x, y, z R. These sentences will be true or false depending on the value of
the variables x, y, z. In general, given a set X and a sentence p(x), with x taking
values in X, three possibilities may occur:
(1) p(x) is true for all x X
(2) p(x) is false for all x X
(3) There exist x, y X such that p(x) is true and p(y) is false
To distinguish betwen these 3 cases we introduce the following symbols, called
quantiers:

A.6

p(x) states that for any x X, p(x) is true; that is, we are in case (1).

xX

p(x) states that there is at least one element x X such that p(x) is

xX

true; that is, we are either in case (1) or case (3).

For example, the following sentences are all true:
x2 + 1 > 0, x4 0, x2 3 = 0

xR

xR

xR

Now, if we negate p(x) then we are not in case (1) so we are either in case (2)
xX

or in case (3). That is, not p(x). In a similar fashion, it follows that, if we
xX

negate p(x), then we are not in case (1) and we are not in case (3). Hence we
xX

are in case (2), which is not p(x). These laws, known as the second De Morgan
xX

laws, are of fundamental importance. We write them again together:

not p(x) not p(x)

xX
xX

not p(x) not p(x)

xX

xX

For example,

x2 0
xR

x = yz

x >0

not

xR

not

xR yR zR

x=
yz

xR yR zR

Exercise 11. Show that

A B x B
xA

Now we look at a more complicated example. Consider the sentence

y x.

xR yR

It states that, given any number x we can always nd a number y such that y x.
This sentence is clearly true: given any x we can take for example y = x. Then
clearly y x. Consider what happens if we switch the quantiers: we get the
sentence y x. This sentence states that there is a number y which is
yR xR

smaller or equal to any other number. This certainly seems false. But to prove it,
it is not enough to claim that we cannot nd any such number! The easier way to
show this sentence is false is to show that its negation is true. The negation of the
sentence is y > x. This sentence is clearly true: given any y choose for
yR xR

example x = y 1.
We just saw that exchanging the order of the quantiers and does not produce
equivalent sentences. On the other hand, exchanging the order of quantiers of the
same type always gives an equivalent sentence. For example, the propositions

(x3 = y 3 x = y)

(x3 = y 3 x = y)

xR yR

yR xR

are equivalent, and we can also write

x,y R

(x3 = y 3 x = y)

A.7

Remark 3. It is common to write simply p(x) q(x) with the meaning that
(p(x) q(x)). In the same way it is common to write p(x) q(x) instead of
xX

(p(x) q(x)). As examples, we have the true sentences

xX

x<1x<3
(x < y and y < z) x < z
x2 > 0 x = 0
(x > 3 or x = 3) x 3
Exercise 12. Show that the following are equivalent sentences:
(1) A B
(2) For any set C, (B C) A = B (C A)
(3) There is a set C such that (B C) A = B (C A)
A.8. Collections of Sets. As a direct application of quantiers we can generalize
the notions of union and intersection to arbitrary collections of sets (the name
collection of sets is a way to refer to a set whose elements are also sets, for example
P (E)). Let C be a collection of sets. Then we can join all the elements of all the
sets in C into a new set:

Denition 7. We dene the union

X as the set whose elements are charac
XC

terized by
x

X x X

XC

X C

We can also consider the elements common to all sets in C :

Denition
8. Let C be a nonempty collection of sets. We dene the intersection

X as the set whose elements are characterized by

XC

x
X x X
XC

X C

Exercise 13. Let C = {A, B}. Show that

X = A B,
X =AB
XC

Exercise 14. Show that

XC

X=

A.9. Sets dened by sentences. Given a set X, a very important way to build
subsets of X is the following: consider a sentence p(x) where x takes values on the
set X. Then we build the subset of X whose elements are exactly those for which
p(x) is true. We denote this set by {x X | p(x)}:
y {x X | p(x)} (y X and p(y))
One of the more important axioms of set theory is the following:
Axiom 2. The set {x X | p(x)} exists.
Exercise 15. Show that
(1) A B = {x A | x B};
(2) A B = {x A | x
/ B}.

A.8

Exercise 16. Show that

{x X | p(x)} {x X | q(x)} p(x) q(x)
xX

Exercise 17. Given a collection of sets C =

show that, for any A C,

X = x A| x X
X C

XC

We will now prove that the intersection of an empty collection of sets is not a
set (the only example of a nonexisting set we will encounter):

Theorem (Russells paradox).

X is not a set.
X

Proof. We will prove by contradiction. This method consists in assuming the result
we want to prove is false and arriving at a contradiction. The contradiction
shows
that our assumption was wrong, hence the result is true. So assume A = X X
is a set. By axiom 2 we can build the set
B = {Y A | Y
/ Y}
Then, by denition of B, the following is a true sentence:
B B (B A and B
/ B)
It follows that both sentences B
/ A and B
/ B must be true. Then, by denition
of A,

B
/ A not B X B
/X
X

But this last sentence is false so we have reached a contradiction. We conclude A

is not a set.

This problem disappears if we restrict our attention to subsets of a xed universal

set E. Then, we dene, for an arbitrary collection of sets C P(E),

X= xE: xX
X C

XC

Exercise 18. Show that, with this new denition, we have

X=E
X

References
These notes were, in several places, inspired by the presentation of the material
in the following sources:
[1] J. Campos Ferreira, Elementos de L
ogica Matem
atica e Teoria dos Conjuntos,
Lecture Notes, Dept. Math. Instituto Superior Tecnico, 2001 (in portuguese)
[2] P. R. Halmos, Naive Set Theory, SpringerVerlag, 1974
[3] James R. Munkres, Topology, Prentice Hall, 2nd Edition, 1999