Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    Rule 35-Summary Judgment 1.) Nocom vs. Camerino G.R. No. 182984, February 10, 2009 Facts

    Uploaded by

    Jan Michael Lorenzo
    1. The tenants had been tilling land planted with rice and corn owned by Victoria Homes Inc. since 1967. Victoria Homes registered the land and new titles were issued to SMSC. 2. SMSC then mortgaged the land to Banco Filipino as collateral for loans. When SMSC failed to pay, Banco Filipino foreclosed on the mortgage. 3. The tenants filed a complaint against SMSC and Banco Filipino, and the RTC and CA found in favor of the tenants, ruling that as long-time tillers of the land, they had the right to redeem the property. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rule 35-Summary Judgment 1.) Nocom vs. Camerino G.R. No. 182984, February 10, 2009 Facts

    Uploaded by

    Jan Michael Lorenzo
    43 views1 page
    1. The tenants had been tilling land planted with rice and corn owned by Victoria Homes Inc. since 1967. Victoria Homes registered the land and new titles were issued to SMSC. 2. SMSC then mortgaged the land to Banco Filipino as collateral for loans. When SMSC failed to pay, Banco Filipino foreclosed on the mortgage. 3. The tenants filed a complaint against SMSC and Banco Filipino, and the RTC and CA found in favor of the tenants, ruling that as long-time tillers of the land, they had the right to redeem the property. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision.

    Original Description:

    Rules of Court

    Original Title

    RULE 35

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. The tenants had been tilling land planted with rice and corn owned by Victoria Homes Inc. since 1967. Victoria Homes registered the land and new titles were issued to SMSC. 2. SMSC then mortgaged the land to Banco Filipino as collateral for loans. When SMSC failed to pay, Banco Filipino foreclosed on the mortgage. 3. The tenants filed a complaint against SMSC and Banco Filipino, and the RTC and CA found in favor of the tenants, ruling that as long-time tillers of the land, they had the right to redeem the property. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    43 views1 page

    Rule 35-Summary Judgment 1.) Nocom vs. Camerino G.R. No. 182984, February 10, 2009 Facts

    Uploaded by

    Jan Michael Lorenzo
    1. The tenants had been tilling land planted with rice and corn owned by Victoria Homes Inc. since 1967. Victoria Homes registered the land and new titles were issued to SMSC. 2. SMSC then mortgaged the land to Banco Filipino as collateral for loans. When SMSC failed to pay, Banco Filipino foreclosed on the mortgage. 3. The tenants filed a complaint against SMSC and Banco Filipino, and the RTC and CA found in favor of the tenants, ruling that as long-time tillers of the land, they had the right to redeem the property. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    RULE 35- SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    1.) Nocom vs. Camerino G.R. no. 182984, February 10, 2009
    Facts:
    Respondent Oscar Camerino and respondents-intervenors Efren Camerino, Cornelio Mantile, the deceased Nolasco Del
    Rosario, represented by Mildred Del Rosario, and Domingo Enriquez were the tenants who were tilling on the parcels of land
    planted to rice and corn previously owned by Victoria Homes, Inc. Respondent Oscar Camerino and respondentsintervenors Efren Camerino, Cornelio Mantile, the deceased Nolasco Del Rosario, represented by Mildred Del Rosario, and
    Domingo Enriquez were the tenants who were tilling on the parcels of land planted to rice and corn previously owned by
    Victoria Homes, Inc. It was registered with the Registry of Deeds of Rizal and new titles were issued in the name of SMSC.
    Subsequently, SMSC mortgaged to Banco Filipino (BF) the said lots as collaterals for its loans. SMSC failed to pay the loans
    due, Banco Filipino extrajudicially foreclosed the mortgaged. May 10, 2000 SMSC redeemed the lots from Banco FIlipino.
    Respondents then, filed a complaint against SMSC and Banco Filipino with the RTC of Muntinlupa City, Branch 256.
    On January 25, 2002, the RTC of Muntinlupa City, Branch 256, found respondents to be tenants who have been tilling on the
    subject land planted to rice and corn since 1967 and, thus, authorized them to redeem the subject lots. CA affirmed with
    the RTC's decision as well as the Supreme Court.

    You might also like