Scribd
Upload
84 views1 page

Dcrubric

This document appears to be a rubric for grading an assignment analyzing a discourse community. It evaluates students on describing the community and its texts/language, critically analyzing its significance and functions, integrating primary research like observations and interviews, properly citing sources, applying communication models, avoiding errors, and organizing the paper with clear paragraphs. Students can earn between 1-15 points in each category, for a total of 150 points.

Uploaded by

api-312713965
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
84 views1 page

Dcrubric

This document appears to be a rubric for grading an assignment analyzing a discourse community. It evaluates students on describing the community and its texts/language, critically analyzing its significance and functions, integrating primary research like observations and interviews, properly citing sources, applying communication models, avoiding errors, and organizing the paper with clear paragraphs. Students can earn between 1-15 points in each category, for a total of 150 points.

Uploaded by

api-312713965
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

Name

_____________________________________
Analysis of a Discourse Community
Content

Poor
1

Avg.
7

Excell.
15

10

10

Is the community adequately described? Would a reader


unfamiliar with the group be able to understand who is
involved and what goes on in it?
Does the paper identify texts, language, slang,
terminology or other discourse used by the group?
Does the analysis discuss critically the significance of this
community to its members? Does it identify how the
group functions, and its possible future?

Primary Research

Does the observation provide insight into how the


community conducts itself? Is it integrated into the
analysis smoothly?
Does the interview provide insight into the community
from the perspective of another member? Is it integrated
into the analysis smoothly?
Are sources (including primary and secondary) cited
properly, both in-text and at the end of the paper?

Application of Model

Does the paper sufficiently define the theoretical terms it


attempts to use for the analysis?

Grammar/Mechanics/Format

Is the paper free of errors in grammar, spelling,


punctuation, or capitalization?
Is the paper formatted properly in MLA and of an
acceptable length (1000-1250 words)?
Organization

Is the paper well organized? Is it easy to follow? Does


each paragraph serve a distinct purpose?

Notes:
Peer Review: ______ / 15
Planning, 1 & 2nd Draft: ______ / 15
st

Reflection: ______ / 20

Queen | English 10600 | Fall 2016

Total Points: ________ out of 150

You might also like