Physics IA Final
Physics IA Final
Physics IA Final
INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
Subject: Physics
Title: Correlation between speed of sound and temperature
Where
m
s ),
the frequency of
n.d.) [1]
Speed of sound in a certain material depends on two main concepts: the density of the
material and its rigidity (elasticity).
The effect of rigidity is observed in different states This is also observed in solids, which have
the ability to transmit the sound the fastest. Then there are liquids and at the end gases, that
transmit sound the slowest.
Another important factor that influences the speed of sound is the air humidity. As humidity
increases, the number of water molecules in the air increases. The water molecules have a
1
smaller molecular mass than oxygen, carbon dioxide or nitrogen. When there are more water
molecules there is a lower mass to volume ratio. This leads to an overall smaller density of the
air. The denser the air, the slower the sound propagates through it.
The effect of humidity is a little greater at lower air pressures. At high altitudes (6000 m), the
speed was calculated to be around 0.7 percent larger in 100% humid air than in 0% humid air,
keeping the room temperature constant. When increasing the temperature, the effect of
humidity was found to be modestly bigger. (Brennan, J., n.d.) [2]
It was also experimentally determined that the speed of sound is proportional to the square
root of absolute temperature and the ratio of specific heats. (NASA, 2015) [3]
Exploration
Research question: How does the speed of sound in air depend on increasing air
temperature?
Dependent variable:
Wave frequency
Independent variable:
Air temperature
Controlled variables:
Wave length (was always constant for all measurements, equal to two heights of the
Experiment
Hypothesis: The speed of sound will increase as the temperature increases because the
density of air decreases with higher temperatures, due to gas laws.
Equipment used in the experiment:
Frequency generator
Oscilloscope
Speaker
Receiver
Thermometer
Jar
Pot with water
Stove
Oscillosco
pe
Frequency
generator
Speaker
Thermom
eter
First, I took a jar of a known height (16.8 cm) and two sound emitters from sound postcards. I
glued one at the top, which I used as a sound receiver, or a microphone. The other one, I glued
at the bottom and used it as a speaker. I also needed a thermometer in order to measure the
temperature inside the jar.
Next I connected the speaker to the frequency generator and the receiver to the oscilloscope to
be able to analyse the longitudinal wave that occurs. By incrementally increasing the
frequency from small values, I was searching for the maximum amplitude seen on the
oscilloscope. This point is known as the resonance point, as this is where the first standing
wave occurs, known as the fundamental 1 st harmonic that has the wavelength equal to 2
lengths of the jar. If we then further increase the frequency, we eventually reach 2 nd harmonic,
3rd harmonic and so on.
In order to increase the temperature, I put the jar in a pot full of water on the stove. Then I
slowly started heating the pot and the jar on low fire. The heat from the water was transferred
from the water to the air inside of the jar. I started recording the temperatures shown on my
thermometer, and for every change of exactly 2 Kelvins, I changed the frequency in order to
form a standing wave (resonance) in the jar and then recorded that frequency. I repeated the
experiment 3 times, and calculated the average value of the frequency for each temperature.
Raw data
Table 1: Raw data of frequencies
T (C)
f (Hz)
0.05
22.0
24.0
26.0
28.0
30.0
32.0
34.0
36.0
38.0
40.0
0.005
1026
1028
1032
1036
1038
1042
1046
1048
1052
1056
42.0
44.0
46.0
48.0
50.0
52.0
54.0
56.0
58.0
60.0
1060
1062
1066
1070
1074
1078
1080
1084
1088
1092
62.0
64.0
66.0
68.0
70.0
72.0
74.0
76.0
78.0
80.0
1096
1098
1102
1106
1110
1114
1118
1122
1126
1130
Analysis
Velocities were calculated by the formula v =f .
Absolute uncertainties:
Frequency: 2 Hz
Wave length: 0.0005 m
Relative uncertainty of wavelength: 0.3%
Absolute uncertainty of the slope is calculated as half of the difference between maximum and
minimum slopes in the linearized graph of frequency with square root of absolute
temperature:
Hz
K
2.5
100=3.9
64.6
Relative uncertainty of speed of sound is 3.9 +0.3 =4.2
Calculated velocities of sound according to different temperatures are then calculated and
shown in Table 2.
22.0
24.0
26.0
28.0
30.0
32.0
34.0
36.0
V
(
m
)
s
4.2%
345
346
347
348
349
350
352
352
42.0
44.0
46.0
48.0
50.0
52.0
54.0
56.0
356
357
358
359
361
362
363
364
6
62.0
64.0
66.0
68.0
70.0
72.0
74.0
76.0
368
369
370
372
373
374
376
377
38.0
40.0
354
355
58.0
60.0
366
367
78.0
80.0
378
380
at approximately 0.5
m
s
and towards the end for the last four measurements, around 0.75
m
s .
Evaluation
Research question was: How does the speed of sound in air depend on increasing air
temperature? It was found that the results speak in favour of my hypothesis as the speed of
sound did actually increase with increasingly higher temperature. This is most probably
because of the density change of air at higher temperature. Due to gas laws, a higher
temperature results in lower density, which in turn leads to a higher speed of sound. It was
also found that the rate of increase in speed of sound started increasing at higher temperatures.
This is because the speed of sound is linearly dependent on the square root of absolute
temperature. Also, the fact that the jar was not completely sealed could have a small effect. In
order to install the wires and the thermometer, the jar was slightly open and as the
temperatures increased also the amount of water vapour produced from the water in the pot
increased. Some of the vapour went into the jar, which resulted in a graph with exponential
growth because of the effect of humidity.
Main source of systematic errors was the inability to perfectly determine when resonance in
the jar was reached. The display on the oscilloscope allowed me to see when resonance was
reached, but it couldnt help me to determine the point of maxima on the displayed curve.
Therefore, there were probably some mistakes present in determining the wave frequency.
Another important error was controlling the density of air as it is not an ideal gas, so I
assumed its composition was constant throughout the experiment with the exception of water
vapour, as previously discussed. Another important error was the way the thermometer
measured the temperature. Sometimes, it inconsistently jumped through larger value
increments. This error was minimised by carefully observing its measurements throughout the
experiment in order to get an accurate representation.
It would be better to use a newer and more advanced oscilloscope as it was hard to detect
maximum amplitude. More accuracy would be needed for the measurements to be completely
legitimate. I have also only measured the frequencies every two degrees Celsius. Combined
with the uncertainty of the oscilloscope, the readings could be quite inaccurate, resulting in an
8
uneven graph. It would be better to use smaller temperature increments, combined with a
precise and reliable thermometer and also a more modern oscilloscope that could also help me
analyse the points on the graph.
It would also be interesting to measure the speed of sound depending on temperature in other
types of mediums and see what kind of graph would occur in them. This could in the end help
us to also analyse and develop new techniques for recording sounds that instruments emit, and
develop a more advanced and modern approach to recording in studios.
References
[1]The Speed of Sound. (n.d.). Retrieved March 23, 2016, from
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/sound/Lesson-2/The-Speed-of-Sound
[2]
Brennan, J. (n.d.). How Does Humidity Affect Speed of Sound? Retrieved March 23,
Hall, N. (2015, May 5). Speed of Sound. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/sound.html
[4]