Cost Modeling As A Design and Development Tool For Adhesives and Sealants
Cost Modeling As A Design and Development Tool For Adhesives and Sealants
Cost Modeling As A Design and Development Tool For Adhesives and Sealants
INTRODUCTON
The ChemQuest Group has developed a new mathematical tool designed to assess the
economic costs of using adhesives in place of alternative fastener types. This innovative
tool is designed to benefit the managerial decision making process and provide better
focus for the product development community. Developed exclusively for the Adhesive
and Sealant Councils Building The Industry (BTI) Program, these cost models were
made available to the ASC and its 42 coalition member companies.
BACKGROUND
Intense industrial competitiveness in the global manufacturing arena is placing stringent
demands on R&D and product engineering disciplines. Materials engineers, production
engineers, product designers and scientists must all make key decisions on product
design, investments, personnel, market development, and pricing against the metric of
forecast profitability. These decisions are also constrained by a host of scientific and
technological boundaries that define the technical feasibility and business potential of a
given project.
Historically, R&D activities have been compartmentalized, especially in large companies,
and widely separated from the groups responsible for business development. Generally
R&D groups paid little attention to manufacturability and cost, which has rendered much
of the fundamental research quite remote from the long-range strategic goals of the
business. Such disconnected research has often fallen prey to cost-cutting measures.
Likewise, engineers have learned primarily on the job, as institutionalized knowledge has
been passed down from one generation to the next. Design tools to assist engineers in
selecting adhesives over other incumbent fasteners are scarce. These developments are
taking place in the face of key innovations increasingly utilizing the computer to provide
quick answers in a more cost effective manner.
Therefore, in conjunction with the Adhesive and Sealant Councils Building The Industry
(BTI) Program The ChemQuest Group has developed a comprehensive comparative cost
model to compare the total value in use cost of joining components or their subassemblies by structural adhesives, mechanical fasteners, or welding. The models output
is expressed in both $/per bond/joint assembled and also in aggregate on an annual basis.
In addition to the model a user manual gives detailed instructions on how to use the
model and provides detailed descriptions of all of the design components and
assumptions that make up the model.
2
3
4
5
To make the model manageable the input columns a user sees depends upon which button
is selected. Each button runs a macro that hides rows and columns that are not needed for
the type of bonding/joining method chosen.
Also, where possible the user input choices are from drop down boxes that allow the
user to choose from among a list of inputs. For example, one the of the user input
columns under the Adhesive & Sealant view is Technology. By choosing from the list of
formulations, the model fills in a specific gravity column from the assumption table. The
specific gravity value in turn is an input for calculating the grams of adhesive used per
bond, which in turn is used in calculating the cost of adhesive material used per bond.
CHEMQUESTS EXPERIENCE
As the ChemQuest Group conducted a cost analysis of the scores of joining applications
in seventeen market segments examined for ASCs Building The Industry (BTI) Program,
it became apparent that adhesives were rarely the cheapest bonding application in total
applied cost. The primary reason for this turned out to be the element of labor time
needed. Invariably, the amount of time to join a component through the use of adhesives
was longer than that of mechanical fasteners and had by far the largest impact on total
applied cost of any variable in the model. One of the few applications that turned out to
be considerably cheaper on an applied cost basis with adhesives was in bonding deck
flooring using adhesives versus the incumbent fastening technique with screws.
But, the value proposition for adhesives and sealants go well beyond applied cost.
Therefore, it is important for users to understand that the constraints of the model are
limited to existing processes. ChemQuest interviewed over 1000 participants in its
market research and conducted eight focus groups in three different industries
(transportation, construction, and product assembly) and amongst university academics.
We learned that adhesives and sealants provided a number of benefits that are difficult to
capture in a cost model.
Those benefits include:
Therefore, the value proposition for moving from mechanical fasteners to adhesives in
the structural markets evaluated is through value add opportunities, where new value is
enabled by adhesives and sealants that the customer will pay more for, as opposed to cost
reductions through the elimination of mechanical fasteners.
Authors:
Mr. Todd Muhleman- Sr. Analyst
Mr. Daniel Murad- President and CEO
The ChemQuest Group, Inc.
8150 Corporate Park Dr. Suite 250
Cincinnati, OH 45242
(513) 469-7555