Practical Techniques For Achieving Improved Accuracy in Bracket Positioning
Practical Techniques For Achieving Improved Accuracy in Bracket Positioning
Dr. John Bennett completed his orthodontic training at the Eastman Dental
Institute in London, England in 1972. Since that time he has been in the full time
practice of orthodontics in London, England. For the past 20 years he has worked
exclusively with the pre-adjusted appliance system, and with Dr. McLaughlin has
held a particular interest in evaluating and refining effective treatment mechanics
utilizing light forces. These concepts have developed and have included the more
recent contribution from Dr. Trevisi. Their well tried and effective treatment
approach has seen widespread acceptance. Dr. Bennett has lectured
internationally on the pre-adjusted appliance for a number of years. Together
with Dr. McLaughlin he has published numerous articles and has co-authored two
orthodontic textbooks, both of which have been well received. He is currently a
part-time clinical instructor at the post-graduate orthodontic program at Bristol
University in England.
Dr. Hugo Trevisi received his dental degree in 1974 at Lins College of Dentistry in
the state of São Paulo, Brazil. He received his orthodontic training from 1979 to
1983 at that same college. Since that time he has been involved in the full time
practice of orthodontics in Presidente Prudente, Brazil. He is a Faculty Member at
the University of Odontology and Dentistry in Presidente Prudente. He has
lectured extensively in South America and Portugal and has developed his own
orthodontic teaching facility in Presidente Prudente. Dr. Trevisi has 20 years of
experience with the pre-adjusted appliance. He is a member of the Brazilian
Society of Orthodontics and the Brazilian College of Orthodontics.
Figure 1.
Figure 2a.
Recommended bracket positioning chart.
Figure 2b.
Bracket positioning gauges.
The bracket placement gauges are used in slightly different ways
in different areas of the mouth. In the incisor regions the gauge is
placed at 90° to the labial surface (Fig. 3). In the canine and
premolar regions the gauge is placed parallel with the occlusal
plane (Fig. 4a, 4b, 4c). In the molar region the gauge is placed
parallel with the occlusal surface of each individual molar (Fig. 5a,
5b, 5c).
Figure 3.
In the incisor region, the gauge is placed at 90° to the labial
surface.
Figure 4a.
In the canine and premolar regions the gauge is placed
parallel with the occlusal plane.
Figure 4b.
Parallel placement on UL Cuspid.
Figure 4c.
Lower bicuspid placement.
Figure 5a.
In the molar region the gauge is placed parallel with the
occlusal surface of each individual molar.
Figure 5b.
Molar attachment positioned parallel to occlusal surface.
Figure 5c.
Parallel gauge placement to molar’s occlusal surface.
Figure 6.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Rotations
Figure 10.
Figure 11b.
Figure 12a.
The mesial of the lower first molar band should not be seated too
low. This is a common error.
Figure 12b.
Care is needed to avoid positioning the lower first molar band with
the bracket too mesially. It should straddle the buccal groove (Fig.
13).
Figure 13.
The lower molar tube should straddle the buccal groove, mesio-
distally.
If there is a close bite on the lower first molars, the molar bracket
should be at the correct height, as recommended in the bracket
placement chart. It should not be positioned more gingivally. A
lower second molar band and tube can be used in this situation,
as part of the versatility of the MBT™ Appliance System (Fig. 14).
Also, temporary bonding material on the occlusal of the molars, or
an acrylic bite plate can be used to avoid bracket interferences.
Figure 14.
A lower second molar band and tube can be used on the first
molar if the bite is close.
Re-positioning
Figure 16.
The authors take time and care to try to achieve accurate bracket
positioning at the set-up appointment. During treatment bracket
positions are monitored and reviewed at adjustment visits. Using
the techniques described and recommended in this article it is
possible, in most cases, to avoid the need to change bracket
positions in the later stages of treatment. This improves the
efficiency of the treatment and the quality of the results.
References