Nature of The Power of Taxation As An Inherent Power
Nature of The Power of Taxation As An Inherent Power
Nature of The Power of Taxation As An Inherent Power
Power to tax, being inherent in an independent state for its existence and survival by the
furtherance of its multifarious functions, the same does not require delegation from the
supreme law of the land. However, exercise of such power upon the inhabitants is
subject to limitations imposed by the power, by its very nature, or by the Supreme law of
the land, the Philippine Constitution. To tax a subject matter, person, property or excise,
there must be a valid law imposing the same. Validity of a tax measure presupposes the
fact that it has overcome the test and scrutiny against it. Tax measures duly passed by
the legislative department, the Congress or the local legislative under its delegated
power, enjoy the presumption of validity and he who controverts has the duty of proving
that the same is otherwise.
By nature, power to tax is inherent in a sovereign estate so that the grant of which is not
necessary but the exercise is provided safeguards and limitations. This means that the
state needs not be empowered by its constitution or any mandate for it to be allowed to
tax. Such power co-exists with the state and thus, grant is not necessary. What are
being provided by the supreme law of the land, the Constitution, are the guidelines and
the limit on the exercise of the power. It wishes to curtail the exercise in such a way as
not to abuse and misuse said power to the detriment of the majority and to the
advantage of the selected few.
Under our tax system, compliance is initially voluntary on the part of the taxpayers.
Nevertheless, the government through the administrative agency empowered to
administer the tax, the BIR , is clothed with such remedies, under proper procedures, to
imposed correct amount of taxes due to the government upon finding that the
compliance based on the declarations in the return is insufficient. It can issue deficiency
assessment and impose such measures provided under the law within the prescribed
period to see to it that taxes are paid and that tax measures are complied with. This
does not however follow that a taxpayer being assessed is doing an illegal business
because non-payment of the tax does not make the business illegal.
While the power does not emanate from a grant, as the same is necessarily inherent
upon the existence of the state, exercise of the power is subject to those limitations
inherent upon it and those expressly provided for by the Constitution as follows:
Inherent limitations. These limitations are those limitations that emanates from the very
nature of the power of taxation. They are very basic and are built-in with the power.
Some may be similar to the constitutional limitation but the constitutional limitation
seems to be supreme as they are the most specific, thus, specifically intended to rule
the application or exercise of the power of taxation. Hereunder are the INHERENT
LIMITATIONS:
• Levy for public purpose. To levy a tax means to impose or to charge or to collect a
tax from those to whom it is addressed. Technically however, to levy is to pass on laws
or ordinances imposing a tax or duty upon specific group of taxpayers. Under this
concept, the impelling reason for the imposition of the tax must be the welfare of the
public, in general. This follows that the proceeds from such imposition shall inure to the
benefit of the public.
In one case, a certain imposition was successfully passed for the purpose of upholding
the welfare of the sugar industry. It was questioned on the ground that there is no
PUBLIC purpose since the sugar industry does not allegedly represent the public. The
issue was resolved in favor of the validity of the imposition. While sugar industry does
not represent the entire public as the proceeds would not add to the general budget of
the national government, nevertheless, the industry itself admits of a public nature
whose circumstances and effects directly affect the public. The requirement of direct
purpose does not admit of a direct public benefit from the imposition.