Lagos City
Lagos City
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Investment decision is one of the most crucial management decisions. This
is because funds and other resources are scarce and their opportunity cost
very High.
Besides, any Investment Decision taken rightly or wrongly has lasting effect
on future growth and Development of the firm. Since most Investment
involve the commitment of substantial amount of the firm’s scarce
resources, any faulty decision may lead to substantial amount of losses. To
forestall this possibility it becomes necessary to appraise carefully the
alternate capital spending proposal and to select the one’s that promise
maximum pay-off.
1
Discounting Techniques: This is a method of Investment appraisal that takes in
to account the time of money. The method used here are:
(i) Net Present Value (NPV)
(ii) Internal Rate of Return
2
CHAPTER TWO
1. INVESTMENT
Investment can be defined as any expenditure in expectation of future
benefits. It can be divided into capital and revenue expenditure and can
be made in non-current asset or working capital.
Capital Expenditure is expenditure which results in the acquisition of
non-current asset or an improvement in their earning capacity. It is not
charged as an expense in the Income Statement, the Expenditure
appears as a non-current asset in the Balance Sheet.
Revenue Expenditure is charged to the Income Statement and is
expenditure which is incurred.
(a) For the purpose of trade of the business
(b) To maintain the existing earning capacity of non-current asset
3
(a) When there are two or more ways of achieving the same objective
(mutually exclusive investment opportunities), a commercial
organization might prefer the option with the lowest value of cost.
(b) The cost of capital that is applied to the project cash flows by Public
Sector will not be a commercial rate of return, but one that is
determined by the Government.
ORIGINATION OF PROPOSAL
Investment opportunity does not just appear out of this. They must be
created.
Any organization must therefore setup a mechanism that scan the
environment for potential opportunities and give an early warning of
future problems.
Ideas for Investment might come from those working in technical
position. Innovative ideas, such as new product lines, are more likely to
come from those in Higher level of management, given their strategic
view of the organization direction and their knowledge of the
competitive environment,
4
The overriding feature of any proposal is that it should be consisted with
the organization overall strategy to achieve its objectives.
PROJECT SCREENING
Each proposal must be subjected to detailed screening to that a
qualitative evaluation of a proposal can be made, a number of key
questions such as those below might be asked before any financial
analysis is undertaken. Only if the project passes this initial screening
will more detailed financial analysis begin.
The first two items are probably easier to control than the third because
the control can normally be applied soon after the capital expenditure
has been authorized, whereas monitoring the benefits will spend a
longer period of time.
5
INVESTMENT APPRAISAL PROCESS & TECHNIQUES
RELEVANT CASH FLOW IN INVESTMENT APPRAISAL
The cash flow that should be considered in investment appraisal are
those which arises as a consequence of the investment decision under
evaluation. Any cost incurred in the past, or any committed cost which
will be incurred regardless of whether or not an investment is
undertaken are not relevant cash flow
The annual profit from a project can be calculated as incremental
contribution earned minus any incremental fixed cost which are
additional cash item of expenditure {i.e. ignoring depreciation and so
on}
There are however, other cash flow to consider this might include the
following.
Opportunity cost: these are cost incurred or revenue cost from
diverting existing resources from the best use.
Tax: the extra taxation that will be payable on extra profit or the
reduction in tax arising from capital allowance or operating hosses in
any year.
Residual value: the residual value or disposal value of equipment at
the end of its life or disposal cost
Illustration:
Calculate the payback period of the project below
Yr
0 100,000
1 30,000
2 50,000
3 20,000
4 10,000
Solution:
Yr
0 100,000 (100,000)
1 30,000 (70,000)
2 50,000 (20,000)
3 20,000 -
4 10,000 -
The capital asset would be depreciated by 25% of its cost asset year, and
will have no residual value. You are required to asses whether the project
shall be undertaken.
Solution
The annual profit after depreciation, and the mid year net book value of
the asset would be as follows
Yr Profit after Mid year ARR in the year
Depreciation Book of value
1 0 70,000 0
2 5,000 50,000 10
3 15,000 30,000 50
4 5,000 10,000 50
As the table shown, the ARR is how in the early stage of the project,
partly because of low profit in yr1 but mainly because of the Net book
value of the asset is much higher early on its life.
The project does not achieve the target ARR of 20% in its first two years,
but exceeds it in year 3 and 4 should it be undertaken?
When the accounting rate of return from a project varies from year to
year, it a=makes sense to take an overall or average view of the project’s
return. In this case, we should look at the return as a whole over the 4-
year period.
N
Total profit before depreciation over 4 years 105,000
Total profit after 4 years 25,000
Average annual profit after depreciation 6,200
Original cost of investment 80,000
Average net book value one 4 years period ( 80,000+0) = N40,000
2
ARR = 6250
40,000 = 15.6%
8
The project should be undertaken because it will fail to yield the target
return of 20%
Equipment Equipment
Item X Item Y
Capital cost 80,000 150,000
Life 5yrs 5yrs
Solution.
Item X Item Y
Total profit before depreciation 160,000 280,000
After depreciation 80,000 130,000
Average Annual profit depreciation 16,000 26,000
(Capital cost + Disposal value)/2 40,000 75,000
ARR 40% 34.7%
Both projects would earn a return in excess of 30% but since item X would
earn a bigger ARR, it would be preferred t item Y.
DISDAVANTAGES OF ARR
1. It is based on accounting profit not cash flow
2. It takes no account the size of investment.
3. It takes no account the length of project.
4. It ignores the time value of money.
9
ADVANTAGES OF ARR
1. It is a quick and simple calculation.
2. It involves a familiar concept of a percentage.
3. It look at the entire project life.
Example:
A coy is considering a capital Investment, where the estimated cash
flows are as follows:
YR CASHFLOW
0 ____________________________ (100,000)
1 _____________________________ 60,000
2 _____________________________ 80,000
3 _____________________________ 40,000
4 _____________________________ 30,000
10
The company’s cost of capital is 15% you are required to calculate the
NPV of the project and to access whether it should be undertaken.
Solution
YR CASHFLOW DCF @ 15% PY
0 (100,000) 1:00 (100,000)
1 60,000 0.870 52,500
2 80,000 0.756 60,480
3 40,000 0.658 26,320
4 30,000 0.572 17,160
NPV 56,160
DISADVANTAGE OF NPV
(1) There is need for management to determine the appropriate cost of
capital to use. This may be particularly difficult for companies that
are not listed.
(2) It does not take Risk into consideration.
(3) The NPV method may not give satisfactory answer when the
projects being compared involve different amount of capital
invested.
ADVANTAGES OF NPV
(1) Timing of cash flow is considered.
(2) Cash flow is over the entire life of the project are taken in to
consideration
11
Example:
A company is trying to decide whether to buy a machine for N80,000
which will save cost of N20,000 per annum for 5 yrs and which will have
a resale value of N10,000 at the end of 5yrs. If it is the company’s policy
to undertake projects only if they are expected to yield Def return of 10%
or more, ascertain whether this project be undertaken.
Solution:
Annual Depreciation would be 80,000 – 10,000 =N14,000
5
The Return on Investment would be
20,000 –14,000 =6,000 =13.3%
½ (80,000 + 10,000) 45,000
Calculate the second NPV using a Rate greater than the first.
Let’s try 12%
YR CASHFLOW DCF 12% PV
0 (80,000) 1.000 (80,000)
1-5 20,000 3.605 72,100
5 10,000 0.567 5670
2,230
12
NPV AND IRR COMPARED
(a) When cash flow patterns are conventional both methods gives the
same accept or reject decision.
(b) The IRR method is more easily understood
(c) NPV is technically superior to IRR and easy to calculate
(d) IRR and accounting ROCE can be confused
(e) IRR ignores the Relative size of Investment
(f) Where cash flow patterns are non-conventional, there may be
several IRR which decision make must be aware of to avoid making
the wrong decision.
(g) The NPV is superior for ranking mutual exclusive project in order of
attractiveness.
13
CHAPTER THREE
14
CHAPTER FOUR
Sex Respondent %
MALE 6 60%
FEMALE 4 40%
100
2. AGE GROUP
Respondent %
21 – 30yrs 2 20
31 – 40yrs 4 40
41 – 50yrs 2 20
51 – 60yrs 1 10
61 Above 1 10
100
20% of the respondents are with the age group 21 – 30yrs, 40% with the
age group 31 – 40yrs, 20% with the age group 41 – 50yrs, 10% with age
group 51 – 60yrs and 10% with 61 and above.
3. PROFESSION / OCCUPATION
Respondent
Business Men 2 20%
Banker 2 20%
15
Accountant 2 20%
Civil Servant 1 10%
Financial Analyst 3 30%
Other -
100%
20% of the respondents are trader, 20% of the respondents are Bankers,
20% of the respondents are Accountant, 10% of the respondent are civil
servant and 30% are Financial Analyst.
Respondent %
Yes 10 100%
No -
40% of the Respondent invested in Oil and Gas, 40% of the Respondent
invest in Banking, 10% in Manufacturing, 10% in Mining/Construction
16
100
Yes 7 70%
No 3 30%
100
100% users payback 10% uses ARR, 40% uses NPV, 10% uses IRR and
30% uses cost of capital.
17
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 SUMMARY
This study examines investment decision and the appraisal process using
professional that has small companies they managed which also has
investment in different portfolio.
Investment decisions are long term corporate finance decision
relating to fixed assets and capital structures decisions are based on several
inter-related criteria
1) Corporate management seeks to maximize the value of firm by
investment in project which yields a positive Net present value when valued
using an appropriate discount rate.
2) These projects must also be financed appropriately
3) If no such opportunities exist, maximizing shareholders value dictates
that management must return excess cash to shareholders
5.2 CONCLUSION
Each project’s value will be estimated using a discounted cash flow
valuation and the opportunity with the highest value as measured by the
resultant Net present value will be selected. This requires estimating the
size and timing of all the incremental cash flows resulting from the project.
The NPV is greatly affected by the Discount Rate, thus, identifying the
proper discount rate is critical to making appropriate decision. The
discount rate is the minimum acceptable return on investment. The
discount rate should reflect the riskness of the investment, typically
measured by volatility of cash flow and must take into account the
financing mix.
In conjunction with NPV, there are several other measures used as
(secondary) selection criteria in corporation finance. These are visible from
DCF and include discounted pay back period, internal rate of return,
equivalent annuity, capital efficiency, discounted pay back period and
return on investment.
5.3 RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings, the following principles have been put forward for
adoption:
1) Individual companies must allocate resources between competing
opportunity {project}
2) Making this capital allocation requires estimating the value of each
opportunity or project, which is a function of size, timing and prediction of
future cash flow
3) Management must also attempt to match the financing mix to the asset
18
being financed as closely as possible in term of both timing and cash flow.
REFERENCES
19