Formulae for the self and mutual inductances of straight wires and rectangles are to be found in various books and papers, but their demonstrations are usually omitted. I have derived the formulae in the simplest possible manner, using the law of Biot and Savart in the differential form instead of N eumann's equation. In the following demonstrations the magnetic field is assumed to be instantaneous; in other words, the dimensions of the circuit are assumed to be small enough
Formulae for the self and mutual inductances of straight wires and rectangles are to be found in various books and papers, but their demonstrations are usually omitted. I have derived the formulae in the simplest possible manner, using the law of Biot and Savart in the differential form instead of N eumann's equation. In the following demonstrations the magnetic field is assumed to be instantaneous; in other words, the dimensions of the circuit are assumed to be small enough
Formulae for the self and mutual inductances of straight wires and rectangles are to be found in various books and papers, but their demonstrations are usually omitted. I have derived the formulae in the simplest possible manner, using the law of Biot and Savart in the differential form instead of N eumann's equation. In the following demonstrations the magnetic field is assumed to be instantaneous; in other words, the dimensions of the circuit are assumed to be small enough
Formulae for the self and mutual inductances of straight wires and rectangles are to be found in various books and papers, but their demonstrations are usually omitted. I have derived the formulae in the simplest possible manner, using the law of Biot and Savart in the differential form instead of N eumann's equation. In the following demonstrations the magnetic field is assumed to be instantaneous; in other words, the dimensions of the circuit are assumed to be small enough
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 44
THE SELF AND MUTUAL INDUCTANCES OF LINEAR
CONDUCTORS.
By Edward B. Rosa.
Formule for the self and mutual inductances of straight wires
and rectangles are to be found in various books and papers, but
their demonstrations are usually omitted and often the approximate
formule are given as though they were exact. I have thought that
a discussion of these formule, with the derivation of a number of
new expressions, would be of interest, and that illustrations of the
formule, with some examples, would be of service in making such
numerical calculations as are often made in scientific and technical
work.
I have derived the formule in the simplest possible manner, using
the law of Biot and Savart in the differential form instead of Neu-
mann’s equation, as it gives a better physical view of the various
problems considered. ‘This law has not, of course, been experi-
mentally verified for unclosed circuits; but the self-inductance of an
unclosed circuit means simply its self-inductance as a part of a
closed circuit, the total inductance of which can not be determined
until the entire circuit is specified. In this sense the use of the law
of Biot and Savart to obtain the self-inductance of an unclosed cir-
cuit is perfectly legitimate. I have also shown how, by the use of
certain arithmetical mean distances in addition to geometrical mean
distances, the accuracy of some of the formule can be increased.
In the following demonstrations the magnetic field is assumed to
be instantaneous; in other words, the dimensions of the circuit are
assumed to be small enough and the frequency of the current slow
gor302 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (Wot. 4. No.2.
enough so that it is not necessary to take account of the finite
velocity of propagation of the field. ‘This may be done even when
the field is integrated to infinity, as the distant magnetic field is
canceled when two or more open circuits are combined into a closed
circuit
1, SELF-INDUCTANCE OF A STRAIGHT CYLINDRICAL WIRE.
Let AB bea length / of a cylindrical wire of radius p traversed
by current ¢ distributed uniformly over the cross section of the wire.
ax D
>
fee nna eee nenn nnn ny
————
B
7
1
4
4
'
i
I
I
t
f
i
i
'
'
{
{
1
'
i
4
Fig. 1
‘The magnetic force at P normal to the paper due to an element of
the cylinder of length dy is,
— ayy?
It is easy to show* that the force at any point outside a right
cylinder is the same as though the current were concentrated at the
1 For a disenssion of the self-inductance of an open circuit closed by displacement
currents in which the finite velocity of the field is taken into account see a recent
paper by K. Ogura and C. P, Steinmetz, Phys, Rev., 25, p. 184, Sept., 1907.
? Minchin, London Electrician, Sept. 27, 1895.
‘M. Wien, Wied. Annal. 58, p. 928, 1894, gives a number of formulae for the self
and mutual inductance of linear conductors,Rosa.) Inductance of Linear Conductors. 303
axis of the wire. The force at P due to the whole length of the
cylinder carrying unit current is then,
to ady re)
Jo [ay]! aa +b wath +e
The number of lines of magnetic force @N, within the strip CD,
of breadth dx, is found by integrating the expression for H along
the strip.
This,
(2)
"The whole number of lines of force V outside the wire which will
collapse upon the wire when the current ceases is found by inte-
grating dV with respect to x from x=ptox=o. ‘Thus, replacing
a by x in (2),
Fea { [ERR ferns veer rtog bP EEY (aa)
or, V= Nox crt +e Fr +0] (3)
= at[ tog? — | approximately (4)
This is the number of lines of force outside the wire due to unit
current in the wire, and is therefore that part of its self-inductance
ZL, due to the external field. We must now find Z, due to the field
within the wire.
The strength of field at the point P within
eg Bt A
the wire ise The number of lines of force
in the length / within the element dx is, Ze)
therefore,
atladx
e
Fig. 2.
11737-07-—9304 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. {vot.4,No2.
If we integrate this expression from 0 to pwe have the whole
number of lines of force within the conductor. ‘Therefore
A “i (5)
"Thus there are @ lines or tubes per unit of length within any cylin-
drical conductor carrying a current ¢, or one tube per cm for unit
current’
‘The lines within the conductor do not cut the whole cross section
of the conductor, as do those without. We must weight them, in
estimating their effect on the self-inductance, in proportion to the
area of the section of the conductor cut by each elementary tube.
Thus,
tL,= rid =f]
el
?
ae xe [5 a =!
or L,= 7 6
"Thus the Z lines or tubes within the conductor contribute only half
as much toward the self-inductance of the conductor as an equal
number of lines outside the conductor would do.
If the permeability of the wire is » the part of the self-inductance
due to the internal field is
Zl
L=* (”)
We may derive (6) otherwise thus: The field at P is
- p
The total energy W inside the wire is
I
Wee
dv,
3 For convenience we may, however, speak as though there were many lines or
tubes within the conductor due to unit current,Rosa.) Inductance of Linear Conductors. 305
where the integration is taken throughout the entire volume of the
cylindrical wire.
Thus, since do=2mxlax
yee) (3 a
4 omxidx =" | aca" (8)
P p 4
ei :
But since 17=+Z,/", we have
Z
Lai,
as found above by the first method (6).
‘The total self-inductance of the length / of straight wire is there.
fore the sum of Z, and Z,, as given by (3) and (6), or
LP ae l
L= qr log Hite FF a+i+e] (9)
=a[to #3] approximately. (10)
Pp 4,
=21[ 108 Bayt] (rr)
p 4.
where the permeability of the wire is 4, and that of the medium out-
side is unity. This formula was originally given by Neumann. For
astraight cylindrical tube of infinitesimal thickness, or for alternating
currents of great frequency, when there is no magnetic field within
the wire, we have for the self-inductance instead of (10) or (r1)
i aff log u | (x1a)
2, THE MUTUAL INDUCTANCE OF TWO PARALLEL WIRES.
‘The mutual inductance of two parallel wires of length J, radius p,
and distance apart d will be the number of lines of force due to unit
current in one which cut the other when the current disappears.
This will be the value of V given by (2a) when the limits of inte-
gration are d and co instead of p and o as before.306 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (vot. 4, No.2.
aft log NEE ere] (12)
=21[tog a +4] approximately (13)
when the length / is great in comparison with a.
Equation (12), which is an exact expression when
the wires have no appreciable cross section, is not an
exact expression for the mutual inductance of two
parallel cylindrical wires, but is not appreciably in
error even when the section is large and @ is small if
Zis great compared with d. he force in that case
due to A at all points outside A is exactly the same
as though the current were concentrated at the center
O, of A; and the geometrical mean distance from O, to
the cross section of B is exactly the distance @ between
O, and 0, The mean distance from QO, to all the
points in the section of B is not, however, quite the
same as d, although the mean of the log of these
distances is log @. Hence there is a very slight difference in the
last term of (12) depending upon the section of the wires and a still
smaller difference in the
other terms. (See p. 331.)
This is, however, too small
to be appreciable in any
ordinary case, being a small
quantity of thesecond order
when Z is large compared
with d.
a
Fig. 3
a
Fig. 4
3, THE SELF-INDUCTANCE OF A RETURN CIRCUIT.
If we have a return circuit of two parallel wires each of length 7
(the current flowing in opposite direction in the two wires) the self-
inductance of the circuit will be, neglecting the effect of the end
connections shown by dotted lines, Fig. 3,
L=2L,—2M \Rosa) Inductance of Linear Conductors. 307
where Z, is the self-inductance of either wire taken by itself, and 7
is their mutual inductance, Substituting the approximate values of
ZL, and M we have
= 4{ toe’ £) approximately (14)
‘The same result follows if we integrate the expression for the mag-
netic force between the wires due to unit current, W7=2/x.
Thus,
a
2dx d
= all
J ee
»
Multiplying this by two (for both wires) and adding the term due
to the magnetic field within the wires we have the result given by
(14). If the end effect is large, as when the wires are relatively far
apart, use the expression for the self-inductance of a rectangle
below (24); or, better, add to the value of (14) the self-inductance of
AB+CD using equation (10) in which /=2AB.
N:
4. MUTUAL INDUCTANCE OF TWO PARALLEL WIRES BY NEUMANN’S
FORMULA.
Neumann’s formula for the mutual inductance of any two cir-
cuits is
are f foe aaa (3)
In this case e=o and cos e=1, r= /d*--(y—6), and the integra-
tion is along both lines.
. f 7 ye / b+ J@ HUF
sn fo [same f oop]
‘The quantity in the brackets is the mutual inductance of the line
AB and unit length of CD at a point distant 4 from the lower end,
Fig. 4a. Now making 4 variable and calling it y, and integrating
along CD from 0 to /, we have 7308 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. [Wot 4 No. 2
B D 72_
aad] Dog ANTE Pea + 4]
which is the same expression (12) found
by the other method. That process is
more direct and simpler to carry out than
to use Neumann’s formula.
&
+
5, MUTUAL INDUCTANCE OF TWO LINEAR CON-
DUCTORS IN THE SAME STRAIGHT LINE
sity
We have found the self-inductance of the
finite linear conductor AB by integrating
the magnetic force due to unit current in
AB over the’ area ABBYA’, extending to
the right to infinity, equations (3) and (9).
| In the same way we may find the
\y mutual inductance of the conductors AB
ene nen
+ =
and BC, lying in the same straight line, by integrating over the
area S, (extending to infinity) the force due to unit current in AB.
/Rosa] Inductance of Linear Conductors. 309
"The magnetic force at the point P (of coordinates x, y, origin at
A) due to current 7 in AB is
a yl
=p Po 6)
‘The whole number of lines of force V, included in the area S, is
naif Bis ee]
= if [eRe EP erie +e]
= yet Fm aP yet
Ltm+yet+(Cemy
a
42-1 log
oe
or My, =1 log Hmm log +”, approximately. (17)
This approximation is very close indeed so long as m does not
approach infinity and the radius of the conductor BC (which we
we have assumed zero) is very small.
If =m, ,
M= 21 log, 2=21x 0.69315 cm.
If m= 1000 /, (17) gives
M=1 log, 1001+ 1000 / log, 1.001 (x8)
= /log, 100r-+/ approximately.310 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (vo.qNo2
If /=1 cm, (18) gives
M=log, 1001+ 1000 log, 1.001
= 6.909+0.999= 7.908.
‘The self inductance of the short wire AB, suppose 1 cm long and
of 1 mm radius, is
L.= log H— .75)=2(2.9957—.75)=4-4915 em,
which is a little more than one-half of the mutual inductance of AB
and BC, BC being 1000 times the length of AB.
In closed circuits, all the magnetic lines due to a circuit are
effective in producing self-inductance, and hence the self-inductance
is always greater than the mutual inductance of that circuit with
any other, assuming one turn in each. But with open circuits, as
in this case, we may have a mutual inductance between two con-
ductors greater than the self-inductance of one of them.
SECOND DERIVATION OF FORMULA (17).
We may derive formula (17) for the mutual inductance of two
linear conductors forming parts of the same straight line by use of
formula (10). Let Z, be the self-inductance of AB, Ly, of BC, and
L that of the whole line ABC. ‘Then we have by (r0)
2 ~3)
L,=2K1
ai(loe 3
Ln= 2m log~ m3)
ot
L=2l+ ee 5] (x9)
‘The mutual inductance Mj, of the two straight lines AB and
BC is then given by the expression
= Lt Ln +2Min
From above Let Ly = 2+ mi loge 3+ allog™ 7
Mig =a og? atten’
or My = Dog +m tog? +mRosa.) Inductance of Linear Conductors. 3rt
which is equation (17), found independently above by integrating
over the area S, the magnetic flux due to unit curtent in AB.
6. DEFINITION OF SELF-INDUCTANCE OF AN OPEN CIRCUIT.
It is of course impossible to maintain a steady current in a
finite straight conductor, or even to start a current
in such a conductor without having a return in
the form of a displacement current. One can
excite an oscillatory current in such a conductor,
but the displacement current which closes the cir-
cuit will produce magnetic force at a distance,
and hence the actual self-inductance of such a cir-
cuit is not the value of the self-inductance given by
equation (9). Fig. 6.
The latter is the self-inductance of a part of a closed circuit due to
thie current in itself. ‘The actual self-inductance of any closed cir-
cuit of which it is a part will be the sum of the self-inductances of
all the parts, plus the sum of the mutual inductances of each one
of the component parts on all the other parts. Thus the self-
inductance of a rectangle is the sum of the self-inductances of the
four sides (by equation 10) plus the sum of the mutual inductances
of 1 and 3 on each other,
and of 2 and 4 on each
other (taking account of
sign the mutual induct-
ances will be negative).
Since the lines of force due
to side 1 in collapsing do
iy not cut 2and 4, the mutual
' inductance of 1 and 3 on 2
! and 4 is zero.
' In arecent number of the
Elektrotechnische —Zeit-
\ schrift,¢ Wagner shows
Fig.7. that the total magnetic
flux of a finite straight conductor as derived from the Biot-Savart
law has an infinite value, and concludes that the self-induct-
ance is therefore infinite and hence that one can properly
2
Za
-o- = 28 ---
'
baw
i
1
|
“Karl Willy Wagner, Elek. Zeit., July 4, 1907, p. 673.3I2 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. ;vol.g.No2
speak of the self-inductance only for closed circuits. In reach-
ing this conclusion he takes the integral expression given by
Sumec' for the flux through a rectangle of length y and breadth
%,—x, due to a finite straight wire of length /, as shown in Fig. 7.
He then lets the rectangle expand, x, being constant, and the ratio
yl, remaining constant until x, and y are both infinite. This gives
an infinite value to the flux, but does not prove the self-inductance
of the finite wire AB to be infinite, defining the self-inductance as I
have done above. When the current in the wire decreases, the field
everywhere decreases in intensity, and we think of the lines as collaps-
ing upon the wire; that is, moving in from all sides upon the wire.
But those lines above BB’ and below AA’ do not cut the wire, and
hence contribute nothing to the self-inductance. For no lines of
force cut across the lines BB’ and AA’ (BB’ and AA of course
extend to infinity) as the field becomes weaker; the lines above BB’
and below AA collapse upon the axis extended of the wire AB.
Fig. 8.
Looking at it in another way, suppose the wire is divided into
two parts at C, and the field between BB’ and AA/ is divided into
F, and F,. The lines of force in F, are due to the whole wire AB
and not to AC simply, but in collapsing when the current ceases
they cut only AC. So the lines in F, are due to the whole wire AB,
but they cut only CB. ‘Therefore in getting an expression for the
seltsinduetance of the wire AB we must find the number of lines of
5]. K, Sumec, Elek, Zeit.; Dee. 20, 1906, p. 1175.Rosa,} Inductance of Linear Conductors. 313
force included between BB’ and AA’ integrating to infinity, and this
is a finite number, as shown above, (3) or (4).
‘To repeat what has already been said above, the self-inductance
of a finite straight wire means its self-inductance as a part of some
closed circuit. The infinite field at a distance due to it is canceled
by that due to the other parts of the closed circuit-which are not
specified. We take account only of those lines which cut the given
conductor in calculating its own self-inductance, and of those lines
only which cut other parts of the circuit in calculating mutual
inductances, ignoring the lines which do neither.
In the case of an oscillating current in a finite straight wire, at
the moment when the current ¢ is a maximum and the potential of
X
the wire is sensibly uniform and equal to zero the energy is 527
where Z is the self-inductance and 7 is the current at the instant.
‘The value of Z is not the value given by (9) nor yet the infinite
value found by Wagner, but is a finite value due to the finite con-
ductor taken in connection with the return displacement circuit. It
is indeed the self-inductance of a closed circuit, and not simply of
the conductor in question. ‘This I take it is what Wagner means,
and not that we can not speak of the self-inductance of an unclosed
circuit in the sense in which it is done throughout this article.
7, THE SELF-INDUCTANCE OF A STRAIGHT RECTANGULAR BAR.
The self-inductance of a straight bar of rectangular section is, to
within the accuracy of the approximate formula (13), the same as
the mutual inductance of two parallel straight filaments of the same
length separated by a distance equal to the geometrical mean distance
of the cross section of the bar. ‘Thus,
L=all tog aa 7] (20)
where 2 is the geometric mean distance of the cross section of the
rod or bar. If the section is a square, R=.447 a, a being the side
of the square. If the section is a rectangle, the value of # is given
by Maxwell's formula. (E.and M., § 692.) For example, when
the rectangular section is 4x1 cm, R=1.118cm. ‘Thus the self-314 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. [Wot g No.2
inductance of a straight square rod is a little less than that of a
round rod of the same diameter, equal indeed to the self-inductance
of a round rod of diameter 1.15 times the side of the square.
Sumec has called attention to the fact that the geometrical mean
distance for the area of a rectangle is very nearly proportional
to the length+of the two sides of the rectangle. Putting a and
for the lengths of the two sides of the rectangle, and R for the
geometrical mean distance of the rectangle from itself,
R=0.2235 (a+ 8) nearly for all values of a and B.
‘The following table shows how nearly
B a constant is the ratio ~ 2 for rectangles of
z different proportions:
Fig. 9.
TABLE I.
a@ and f are the Length and Breadth of the Rectangles. R is the
Geometrical Mean Distance of its Area.
Ratio R a
dora 0.447050 0.22353
1.25: 1 0.402350, 0.22353
15:1 0.372580 0.22355
2:1 0.338400 0.22360
4:2 0.279614 0.22369
10:1 0.245964 0.22360
20 0:1 0.234630 0.22346
1:0 0.223150 0.22315
‘The simple relation between the g.m.d. of a rectangle and the
sum of its two sides, a+, is rather remarkable and, in view of
the complicated formula employed in calculating R for a rectangle,
very fortunate. Substituting this value of R in formula (20) we
have, since log, = 1.500 nearly,
a
0.2235,Row Inductance of Linear Conductors. 315
L=al [oe a +2 £4 oa2asfet8)) (21)
as the formula for the self-inductance of a straight bar or wire of
length / and having a rectangular section of length a and breadth 8.
Substituting Z= 1000, and a+=2 for a square bar 1000 cm long
and 1 square cm section we have, neglecting the small last term,
2000 | I
L= 2000 [ oe. or +3]
= 2000 (6.908 +-0.5) = 14816 cm
=14.816 microhenrys.
‘This would also be the self-inductance for any section having a+8
=2cm.
For a rectangular bar of section 1x 4 cm, we have similarly
£=2000 log, 1045]
= 12.983 microhenrys.
For a wire of rectangular section 1 x 4 mm, and 10 meters long
£L=17.588 microhenrys. .
8. TWO PARALLEL BARS.—SELF AND MUTUAL INDUCTANCE.
‘The mutual inductance of two parallel straight, square, or rectan-
gular bars is equal to the mutual inductance of two parallel wires316 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (vot. 4, No.2.
or filaments of the same length and at a distance apart equal to the
geometrical mean distance of the two areas from one another. This
is very nearly equal in the case of square sections to the distance
between their centers for all distances, the g. m. d. being a very little
greater for parallel squares, and a very little less for diagonal squares*
(Fig. 10). We should, therefore, use equation (13) with @ equal to
the g. m. d. of the sections from one another; that is, substantially,
to the distances between the centers. For the two parallel square
rods ro meters long and 1 cm square (Fig. 10) we have therefore
for the mutual inductance using (13), and taking R=2.0 cm,’
2000 _
M= 2000 (log, 722°)
= 2000 (6.9077—1)
=11.815 microhenrys.
The self-inductance of a return circuit of two such parallel bars
is equal to twice the self-inductance of one minus twice their mutual
inductance. ‘That is,
L=2(L,—-M)
=2(14.812—11.815)
= 5.994 microhenrys.
If they were adjacent to one another the self-inductance of the two
bars would be (their mutual inductance in that case being 13.190)
L=2(14.812—13.190)
= 3.244 microhenrys.
These calculations are of course all based on the assumption of a
uniform distribution of current through the cross section of the con-
ductors. For alternating currents in which the current density is
greater near the surface the self-inductance is less but the mutual
inductance is substantially unchanged.
® Rosa, this Bulletin, 8, p. 1.
T Its more exact value is 2.0010, this Bulletin, 8, p. 9.Rosa.) ” Inductance of Linear Conductors.
9. SELF-INDUCTANCE OF A SQUARE.
317
"The self-inductance of a square may be derived from the expres-
sion for the self and mutual inductance of finite straight wires from
the consideration that the self-in-
ductance of the square is the sum
of the.self-inductances of the four
sides minus the mutual induct-
ances. ‘That is,
L=4L,-4M
the mutual inductance of two
mutually perpendicular sides being
zero. Substituting a for / and d
in formule (9) and (12) we have
B —-
a
Fig. 11.
72. 2 |
£,=20{ tog otlete agri]
M= af log arya
Neglecting p'/a’,
Le a log mea
-f+3]
175+ i+8]
. L=4(L,—-M)= 8 [log —tog, i
L=B8a(log® + P—o.
or aloge ta 0.524)
0.3358] 2)
(22a)
where a is the length of one side of the square and p is the radius
of the wire. If we put /=4a= whole length of wire in the square,
2 4p
= I 4 SP
L=2l (log att 1.910)
or, L=21(log ; —1.910), approximately.
(23)318 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (Vol.q, No.2
Formule (22) and (23) were first given by Kirchhoff* in 1864.
If a= 100 cm, p=0.1 cm, we have from (22)
L=800 (log, 1000—0.524)
= 5107 cm= 5.107 microhenrys.
If p=.05 cm,
L= 5662 cm= 5,662 microhenrys.
‘That is, the self inductance of such a rectangle of round wire is
about 11 per cent greater for a wire 1 mm in diameter than for one
2mm in diameter.
If Jp is constant, Z is proportional to Z.
‘That is, if the thickness of the wire is proportional to the length
of the wire in the square, the self-inductance of the square is propor-
tional to its linear dimensions.
If in the above case where p=o.1, a=200 em,
L= 1600 (log, 2000—0.524)=2 x 5.662 microhenrys.
‘That is, for a square 200 cm on a side, Z is 11 per cent more than
double its value for a square of 100 cm. on a side.
10, SELF-INDUCTANCE OF A RECTANGLE.
(a) The conductor having a circular section.
"The self-inductance of the rectangle of length a and breadth 3 is
\
L=2 (Let Ly—M,—M) \
where Z, and Z, are the self-inductances of the two sides of length
aand 6 taken alone, Mf, and M, are the mutual inductances of the
two opposite pairs of length a and 4, respectively.
*Gesammelte Abhandlungen, p. 176. Pogg. Annal. 121, 1864.Rosa, Inductance of Linear Conductors. 319
From (9) and (12) we therefore have, neglecting p'/a’,
z=a[a log 8 Sa+pleds log 2 35+0]
aioe CNET? ro 6]
bP :
b tog? tate ya P+a]
Putting Ja" {@=d, the tesa of the rectangle,
+ “qunme® # -
or Lado?) logit a log (a+d)—6 log (644)
—Larsraa+e)| (24)
For a=200 cm, 6= 100, p=o.1
£=8017.1 cm=8.01r7 microhenrys.
(0) The conductor having a rectangular section.
For a rectangle made up of a conductor of rectangular section,
axB,
Lexa log4 4-2 gto aasso+8)|
ae
od
1173707 —10320 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. [ot 4, No. 2.
—
My=2 [« log ae ee ead
and L=2 (L,+L,—M,—M), as before.
2ab
(@+8) (at+-ya" +e ait
+0.2235 +8 |
ie z=a[a log —b4 Ja TeR
2ab
+46 log — Gta GLERT —atyete
40.2235 (a+ |
Putting as before d=./a*+-0"=:diagonal of the rectangle, and assum-
ing that the section of the rectangle is uniform; that is, that (a+ 6),
=(4+B)y
a+B
— tb adto.saz +a) (25)
aa [ero log 2% 2 log (a-+-d)—6 log (6+%)
This is equivalent to Sumec’s exact formula’ (6a), the logarithm
of course being natural in (25), as elsewhere in this article.
For a=4, a square,
2a’
a+B
“fn log: arat 22351 4.0, 726
L=8 i+ log (a--ay2)+0.2235 +8)
If a=,,
£=8a[ log {+447 +035] (25a)
If a= 1000, a=1,
L=8000 [6.908-+.033]
= 8000 x 6.941 cm= 55.53 microhenrys.
°Elek, Zeit., p. 1175, 1906.Rosa.) Inductance of Linear Conductors. at
For a circular section, of diameter 1 em, p=0.5
I
= 1 ——,
L=8000 (log, 2000+ focal 524)
=8000 x 7.076 cm = 56.61 microhenrys,
a little more than for a square section, as would be expected.
11. MUTUAL INDUCTANCE OF TWO EQUAL PARALLEL RECTANGLES.
For two equal parallel rectangles of sides a and 4 and distance
apart @ the mutual inductance is the sum of the several mutual
inductances of parallel sides. Writing M,, for the mutual induc-
tance of side 1 on 5, etc., we have
¥
Fig. 13.
M=2 (Myy— My) + 2(Myp— Moy)
From (12) My=al log eee]
b+ Ppa
My=a[ 6 tog eg TO Te sare]
My=2 [« log eHlete rrr +d]
atya to pa
Veta
My=2| a log
Vet +d? Ftd322 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. tvong non
Ma Atay atta vipa
2 Magog (2 5
+9 eT I ED ET rea (26)
For a square, where a=4, we have
+8[ yar aattaed] (a7)
These two formule (26) and (27) may also be derived by inte.
grating Neumann’s formula around the rectangles,"
Formula (26) was first given by F. E. Neumann" in 1845,
12. SELF AND MUTUAL INDUCTANCE OF THIN TAPES.
‘The self-inductance of a straight thin tape of length Zand breadth
4 (and of negligible thickness) is equal to the mutual inductance of
two parallel lines of distance apart R, equal to the geometrical mean
distance of the section, which is 0.22313 4, d
or log R=log o-3
Thus,
L=2ll| tog 1] a roximately
eR PP:
oo
a = [toe o+ | (28)
Fig. 14.
For two such tapes in the same plane, coming together at their edges
“Webster, Electricity and Magnetism, p. 456. Wallentin, Theoretische Elektri.
zititslehre, p. 344. Fleming,
* Allgemeine Gesetze der Inducirten Stréme, Abh. Berlin Akad.Rosa.) Inductance of Linear Conductors. 323
without making electrical contact, the mutual inductance is
M= ai[ toe z— 1]
al
=2/| log = —0.886.
[ e 5 3] (29)
where R, is the geometrical mean distance of one tape from the
other, which in this case is 0.89252 4. For a return circuit made up
of these two tapes the self-inductance is
L=2L,—-2M
R,
=4l (0 R)= 42 log. 4 (30)
= 5.545 x length of one tape.
‘Thus the self-inductance of such a circuit is independent of the
width of the tapes. If the tapes are separated by the distance
4, R,=1.95653 6 and L=8.685 1.
If the two tapes are not in the same plane but parallel and at
a distance apart d (4) Fig. 14, then the geometrical mean distance
between the tapes is given by the formula.
log R=% tog a4t (:-4) log (+-d")424 tan 4 -3 (31)
If d=3, (5) Fig. 9,
log R,=log 45-3 (32)
For a single tape
log R,=log 6—3 (33)
Hence log Rat and for the case shown at (5) Fig. 14,
L=2L,—2M=41 log 5)
i
=4lb= aml (34)324 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (vot.q.No2.
In this case also the self-inductance of 27 cm per unit of length of
the pair of thin strips is independent of their width so long as the
distance apart is equal to their width. ‘The self-inductance is as
much greater in this case than in the case shown in (2) Fig. 14, as
Z is greater than log, 4, or 1.13 times.
13. CASE OF TWO PARALLEL PLATES.—NONINDUCTIVE SHUNTS.
If a thin sheet of manganin or other conductor is doubled on itself
to form a noninductive shunt we can calculate approximately its
self-inductance by the above method.
Let 7=30 em
sateen
d= Icm
By (3x) log R,= 1.0787
log R, =log, 10—3=0.8026
L=41 (log R,—log R,)= 120 x 0.2761
= 33-13 cm
=.0331 microhenrys.
If the resistance of the shunt is .oor ohm, and the
frequency of the current through it is 100 cycles
wt x
erence nn ggee ncn >
Fig. 15. peatan p=.02
and ¢, the angle of lag of the current in the shunt behind the emf.
at the terminals is approximately 12 If »=1000, $= 12° nearly.
By bringing the two halves of the sheet nearer together ¢ could of
course be reduced considerably below 1° for 100 cycles. This would
be desirable for high frequencies. If the sheet were used straight
in the above example the inductance would be six times as great,
unless a return conductor were near.Rosa.) Inductance of Linear Conductors. 325
~ 14. USE OF THE GEOMETRIC MEAN DISTANCE.
In the approximate formula for the mutual inductance of two
parallel wires
M= ai[toe a |
we have only one variable, d. In applying this to determine the
self-inductance of a thin, straight strip we make use of the theorem
that the self-inductance of a circuit is equal to the sum of all the
mutual inductances of the component parts of the circuit; that is,
the sum of the inductances of every element upon itself and every
other element. If there are x elements each carrying ath of the
Fig. 16.
current, each of these * component inductances will be multiplied
by 5 if the total current is unity. Hence we sce that the value of
,
the self-inductance is the average value of the * separate mutual
inductances. But each mutual inductance is
M=al(log 2!—log d—t) (35)
and as the first and third terms are constant, we have only to find
the average value of log d, where d is the distance between every
pair of points in the straight line of length 4 which is the section of
the strip. Since
5 [108 d,tlogdyt..... log an|-2 log [4 dy dy... iy|
slog "Vd, d, d, .
=log R
we see that what Maxwell called the geometrical mean distance R
of the line is the ”™ root of the product of the n distances between
all the various pairs of points in the line, n being increased to
infinity in determining the value of R. This shows why the term
geometrical mean distance was chosen,326 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (vou, No.2
‘The more exact formula (12) for the mutual inductance of two
straight parallel lines may be written
M=2[1 log (+ \F+ a)—1 log d— Pa 4a] (36)
In getting the mean value of this expression for ” pairs of points
along the line 4 we must find not only the mean value of log d, but
also the mean value of @ itself and of d*. The latter means will not
be the same as the geometrical mean distance R, but are the avith-
metical mean distance and the arithmetical mean square distance.
In order, therefore, to obtain an accurate value of the self-inductance
Z for the strip we should determine these arithmetical mean dis-
tances for the section of the strip.
15. DETERMINATION OF THE ARITHMETICAL MEAN DISTANCES OF A LINE.
Let AB be the line of length 4, and we first find the arithmetical
mean distance S, of the point P (AP=c) from all the points of the
line.
This may be done by integration, but the a. m. d. from P to all
points in the line to the right of P is, obviously, ps, and to the left
5 Hence for the whole line
=o" 42
2 + 2
b5,= (0-4 e=
é
mete (37)
2
‘To find S,, the a. m. d. of all points of the line from the line, or the
a. m. d. of the line from itself we must integrate S, over the line.
Thus, putting c=,
(38)Rosa, Inductance of Linear Conductors. 327
‘Thus while the geometrical mean distance of a line is 0.22313 times
its length the arithmetical mean distance is one-third the length.
To find the arithmetical mean square distance S,* from the point
P to the line we integrate as follows :
. .
6S3= f (eofae= Foc
0
3
rida alas (39)
.
If c=o, St="
That is, the arithmetical mean square distance from one end of a
line to the line is 4*/3. Also
v3
To find the a. m. s. d. S,? we integrate again, changing c to x,
tpt a
ast= f'(E ~t2+2") dx=e
(40)
If now in formula (36) above we make the proper substitutions
of geometrical and arithmetical mean distances, we shall obtain a
more accurate expression for the self-inductance of a thin strip.
Since d is small compared with /, formula (36) is very nearly equal
to
& a
Lad rog (2¢[ 145 |) - 108 a1] (41)
@ a
=a[loe at—log d—1— T+ ‘|
For log @ put log o—3
“ — g* put 8/6
“dg put 4/3328 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (vot. Noa
a)
Then z=al[ tog Pal (42)
which is the self-inductance of a straight thin strip of length 7 and
breadth 4,
This formula neglects only terms in 4/2, and is therefore quite
accurate. ‘The value previously found (equation 28) is the same
except for the last two terms. Formula (28) is of course accurate
enough for most cases; but it is interesting to see what the more
accurate expression is when we make use of the arithmetical mean
distances in getting the values of the terms neglected in the first
approximation.
16. SELF-INDUCTANCE OF A CIRCLE OF THIN STRIP,
Let us apply the principle of geometrical and arithmetical mean
distances to obtain the self-inductance of a circular band of radius @
and width 4. ‘This isa short cylindrical current sheet, for which we
have the formula of Rayleigh:
a
a 4a log a ; anry tog +7) (43)
Fig. 18.
Coffin’s formula gives some additional terms in J// and higher
powers, but when 4 is not more than one-fourth of a, Rayleigh’s
formula is correct to within about one part in 100,000, and may
therefore serve as a check on the method of geometrical and arith-
metical mean distances. The mutual inductance of two parallelKosa: Inductance of Linear Conductors. 329
circles of radius @ and distance apart d is, neglecting terms in d'/a*
and higher powers,
a* 8 @
armed (soe ®S-(r2)]
which may be written
; rs
M= nq (1+57)) log 8a — log d— 37 tog d— 5 (45)
In addition to the g. m. d. to be used in the second term and the
arithmetical mean square distance in the first and last terms we have
to know the mean value of a product of g. m. d. anda, m.s. d. in
the third term; that is, a term of the form
S3 log R,
To get this we must integrate as follows:
7
O52 log R= f (w— 0 log(x— dx =
ofemeot mee]
BSP log Re=? f "(6—zx)Mlog (b—x)die + 5 f ” 2 log xd
i f'o—atee— x [see
odo oe
a 7 )
= (log 6-4
ol BO aa (47)
Sf log R,= "(log o—Z 48)
ane = 6 13, 4
We may now substitute in (39) as follows:
log d=log o-3
ae
2
3@=
a
3d? log d=330 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. [Wot No.2
This gives
= & = 3_ & Z ae
z= and (+52) tog 8a—log 643 sass (toe o) a
a A
= arr (14504) log SF Se 4 (49)
which is Rayleigh’s equation (43). ‘This confirms the values of the
quantities S,* and §,"logR, employed in deducing the equation
(49) from the formula (44) for M for two parallel circles,
17, ARITHMETICAL MEAN DISTANCES FOR A CIRCLE.
‘The arithmetical mean distance of any point P on the circumfer-
ence of a circle from the circle is found by integrating around the
circumference. ‘Thus, since PB=2a cos
B z
™\ mas, f 2a cos 6. 20d0= 4a"
P| A 5 = 44
7 (50)
Since the a. m. d. is the same for every point
of the circle we have also
Fig. 19.
Sa (52)
For the arithmetical mean square distance we have
;
SP Si *
and J5;*= a2
cos’ @. 2ad0=2 Ta®
(52)
‘That is, the square root of the arithmetical mean square distance
of every point on a circumference of a circle from every other
point is equal to the radius of the circle into the square root of 2.
For a point P outside or inside the circle we have, sinceRosa. Inductance of Linear Conductors. 332
PB =a'+-d*+2ad cos 6
aS f= af eras 2ad cos 0) d0= a (d*-+ a")
o Spad*+a* (53)
Fig. 20.
For the entire area of the circle with respect to the point P
na’ Si! f “wr yanrdraan[ 4S)
;
o Sioa +S (54)
:
If d=o, S? the value for the area of the circle with respect to
the center of the circle.
For the area of a circle with respect to
itself, the a. m.s.d., ,? would be found by
integrating BP =r) -+r2—2 717, cos (8,—6,)
twice over the area of the circle.
This was done in effect by Wien” in get-
ting his formula for the self-inductance of a
circle, which is a little more accurate than
the formula deduced by the use of geometrical
mean distances only, when the geometrical mean distances are used
for the arithmetical mean distances.
"These examples are sufficient to illustrate the differences in the
values of the geometrical mean distances and the arithmetical mean
Fig. 21.
*M. Wien: Wied. Annal. 58, p. 928, 1894.332 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (Wot 4 No.2
distances, and the use of the latter in the calculation of self and
mutual inductances.
18. CONCENTRIC CONDUCTORS.
‘The self-inductance of a thin, straight tube of length Zand radius
a, is, when a,/ is very small,
L
ad
ai[og 1] (55)
‘The mutual inductance of such a tube on a conductor within it
is equal to its self-inductance, since all the lines of force due to
the outer tube cut through the inner when they collapse on the
cessation of current. ‘The selfinductance of the inner conductor,
suppose a solid cylinder, is
Jo 2i[ tog =
;
> 4 If the current goes through the latter and
CD — teturns through the outer tube the self-induct-
ance of the circuit is,
LaL,+1,—2M=L,—L,
Fig. 22. since M7 equals Z,
; z=al[tog a4] (56)
;
This result can also be obtained by integrating the expression for
the force outside a, between the limits @, and a,, and adding the
term (equation 6) for the field within @,, there being no magnetic
field outside a, Thus
7 [2a c aT) 4.
L=l ar! = aff log +7] as above.
If the outer tube has a thickness @,—a, and the current is distrib-
uted uniformly over its cross section the self-inductance will beaRosa}
Inductance of Linear Conductors. 333
little greater, the geometrical mean distance from a, to the tube,
which is now more than a, and less than a,, being given by the
expression
Putting this value of log a in (56) in place of
log a, we should have the self-inductance of
the return circuit of Fig. 23.
If the current is alternating and of very
high frequency, the current would flow on the
outer surface of a, and on the inner surface
log ay
_ a} log,—at log ay_1
2
(57)
a—ay
of the tube, and Z for the circuit would be
ce
o—t-o
p
L=al log (58)
19. MULTIPLE CONDUCTORS.
If a current be divided equally between two
wires of length Z, radius p and distance d apart,
the self-inductance of the divided conductor is the
sum of their separate self-inductances plus twice
their mutual inductance.
Thus, when d// is small,
al_ 3], ¢f, at
oi} ifeo-]}
or L= afftog a ae afftog ae r| (59)
where 7, is the g. m. d. of the section of the wire=
0.7788p.
If there are three straight conductors in paral.
lel and distance @ apart, as shown in Fig. 24, the
self-inductance is similarly
L= aff os In | (60)334 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (wot. q.No2.
‘The expression (r,@%)t is the g. m. d. of the multiple conductor.
For example, suppose in the last case /=1000 cm, p=2 mm,
d=1om. Then (7,a")}=0.538 cm and
L= 2000[ to, — |
y
0.5380
= 2000 X 7.221 ci=14.442 microhenrys.
If the whole current flowed through a single one of the three
conductors the self-inductance would be
2000
0.2
L=2000 [ee - j= 17.92 microhenrys,
or about 25 per cent more than when divided among the three.
Guye has shown” how, by the principle of the geometrical mean
distance, one can calculate very readily the self-inductance for any
number of similar conductors in multiple when they are distributed
ina circle, Fig. 25.
If there are » conductors uniformly spaced on a circle the geo-
metrical mean distance R of the system is given by
log R= 108 M7 log (Fes Tig s+ + + Tin)
7
= i (log 7+ log (ry. rps ees 1n)) (61)
Fig. 25.
where 7, is the g. m. d. of a single conductor (=0.7788p, p being its
radius) and 7,, is the distance between centers of the conductors 1
and 2, etc. If a is the radius of the circle on which the conductors
are distributed
¥C. E, Guye, Comptes Rendus, 118, p. 1329; 1894.Rosa Inductance of Linear Conductors. 335
log R= “og (yna"™)
or R=(r, na)" (62)
‘The proof of this, as given by Guye, depends on the following
theorem:
If the circumference of a circle is divided into » equal parts by
the points A, B,C, . . . and M be any point on the line through
OA (inside or outside the circle), then putting OM=r
Xana)
A.MB. . MN (Cotes’s theorem).
Dividing by MA=r
wha + 2... a" =MB>MC....MN
Making M coincide with A, and hence a
na"'=AB-AC...AN
San Us... + Gy
which substituted in (61) gives (62).
Since the self-inductance of a length / of the multiple system is
equal to
taal loge] (63)
we see that the calculation for any case is simple when p, a, and 2
are given. Thus, suppose a=2 cm, p=o.5 cm, and =6,
nt
rna"' = 0.3894 X 6X 32
o R=(74.765)'= 2.0525
If the separate conductors have only half the diameter supposed,
namely, p=0.25, the g. m. d. R will be considerably less. In this
case
R=(0.1947 X 192)'= 1.8285 cm.
11737-0711336 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (Wot. 4, No. a
"Thus, in the first case, the self-inductance of the six parallel con-
ductors is equal to that of a thin tube of radius 2.0525 cm, and in
the second case to that of a tube of radius 1.8285 cm. As
increases and p decreases the value of R approaches 2 cm as a limit,
the multiple conductors forming in the limit a tube of infinitesimal
thickness, the value of R for which is its radius a, in this case 2 cm.
Ifa larger conductor at the center carries the going current, and
the return is by the multiple conductor, the mutual inductance of
the larger upon the others is
M= ad[loe ao | (64)
since the g.m. d. of the central conductor on
each of the others is a.
Paest ‘The self-inductance of the return system is
L=L,41L,—2M
_ al_3
where L=2 [toe 2 3]
:
L=2l [ive al—log (r,na")" — |
al
araal[log ¥s|
.
o Laal[ log <
For a=2 cm, a,=1 em, p=0.5, 2=6, J= 1000 em
log (ranae-+F] (6s)
L=2000 [loe. 4—log, (2.0525)+4]
= 2000 X 0.9173 = 1.835 microhenrys.
If the inner conductor were surrounded by a very thin tube of
radius 2 cm fora return, in place of the six wires, the self-inductance
of the return circuit would be
L= 2000] log “ Al 66
= 2000 X 0.9431 cm= 1.886 microhenrys,
a little greater than in the preceding case.Rosa Inductance of Linear Conductors. 337
If the central conductor is also a multiple system, Guye has
shown" how to find the mutual inductance of the two when the
arrangement is symmetrical, the g.m. d. of the two systems being
derived by the aid of Cotes’s theorem. In this case
I
log R= > log (a,"—a,")
1
or Ru=(ay"—a,")* (67)
Fig. 27.
Thus, if a,=2 cm, a,=1 cm, and »=6,
R=(64—1)'= 1.9947
and as # increases Ry, approaches 2 as a limit, as it would be for
two concentric tubes of radii x and 2. R, and R, for the two sepa-
rate systems being given by (62) and Ry, by (67), the self-inductance
of a return circuit with one system for the going current and the
other for the return is readily calculated, being
L=al log zi
2
R 12 (68)
1
‘These examples are sufficient to illustrate the calculation of the
self and mutual inductance of multiple circuits by the principle of
the geometrical mean distance.338 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. [vot.4. No.2
20. SELF-INDUCTANCE OF A “NONINDUCTIVE” WINDING OF ROUND WIRES.
Suppose a toand-fro winding of insulated wire in a plane, the
length of each section being /, the distance apart of the adjacent
wires, center to center, being d, and the wire of radius p. The
resultant self-inductance of one of the wires is equal to the self-
inductance of the wire taken by itself plus the mutual inductance
of all the others upon it. The mutual inductance of wires 2, 2’,
4,4’, 6, 6, etc., upon wire A at the middle of the group tends to
increase the self-inductance of A, while the mutual inductance of
1, V, 3) 3/) 5 5's ete, tends to decrease the self-inductance of A.
Hence, if Z, is the self-inductance of A by itself and AM, is the
mutual inductance of wire 1 on A, etc., we have for Z, the total
resultant self-inductance of wire A of length / the following
expression:
Lyp=L,+ 2M, 42M, + 2M + .. +2M,.— 2M, — 2M,
—2M,— 2M,—...—M,
=(L,-M)—(M,—M,)— (MM) — (MM). --
+(,—M,)+(M,— M+ (MM). + , (69)
dit 2 4 6
= 2} 1 j— 22 1 —2l log t—2/ log-—....
alftog 2+" ]-21 tog 220 tog 4—2/ tog ®
bal log 3422 log Sal log 24+...
2 s 4 6
dit 24-82) 035-73 ‘i
=a) log 24.2 | astog{2-4-% al log 32 Ja:
[ests ° yt 8274.68...Rosa Inductance of Linear Conductors. 339
=21[ log $ in ik attog(2 pacers)
orl = =a1[ tog 2 ata ~2 roe (70)
(where 2m is the whole number of wires)
dit
=2![og 244] (71)
where the constant A depends on the whole number of wires. Since
2A D(Qn+ 1) _
(2n)* 2
when 7 is infinite," we see that equation (70) becomes for an infinite
number of wires
L = 21[ 10g + 1—tog” |
=at[ tog 24 2a yt 1 (72)
‘This formula (72) was first given by Mr. G. A. Campbell.” He
has recently communicated to me by letter his (unpublished) demon-
stration, which is different from that given above and gives the
value of Z for an infinite number of wires and not for any finite
number, which is the more important case.
For 2n=2,d =o
an=4,A =loga — =.6931
an=6, A slog =.2876
2n=10, A=logtt =.3522
ea
an=14, A=log 2 = .3804
175
2n=18, A=2 log. 228 =.3961
)
4 Loney’s Trigonometry II, p. 155.
Elect. World, 44, p. 728; 1904. There is an error in this formula as originally
printed; it should have //2 for coefficient instead of /.340 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (Vo.a.No2
an= 38, A= ...... =.4253
2m=70,A=...... =.4373
an=0, A=log.e =.4516
Thus we see that the resultant self-inductance of the middle wire
of such a “noninductive” system is always less than that of a sin-
gle pair, by the quantity 2 AZ If the winding is such that @= 3p,
log, c+ 1=1.35) approximately, and the seliinductance of the mid-
dle wire is about two-thirds as much when there is a great number
of such wires side by side as when there is a single pair, and about
three-fourths as much if there are 10 such wires (5 pairs).
"The self-inductance of the end wire will be more, being
L=L,-M,4+M,—-M,4+M,—.....
=at[ tog 4 Fah an) + (a= ah) +...
= @ i 3
=al[togl+ £419 204.6
dit
=2/] log—+ = — A, .
[ee 5 ‘]
where 4,= log. 3 for 2n=4
= log. “ an=6 ete.
For the next to the end wire
d,t
i= af[ lox’ +i 4,
8
where dy=log,S for 20=4
16
=log 28 « an=6, ete.
Bs
For the second from end wire
Ay= log. for 2n=8Rosa.) Inductance of Linear Conductors. 342
‘These examples show how the self-inductance of any particular
wire of such a winding may be computed and the average or total
value found. For a large number the average value of A would
evidently not be far from 0.40.
21. CASE OF NONINDUCTIVE WINDING ON A CIRCULAR CYLINDER.
"The self-inductance of a single circular turn would be approxi-
mately
£,=4mf og *2_1.75|
where a is the radius of the circle and p is the radius of section of
the wire. ‘The mutual inductance JZ, of two adjacent turns is
N= 4a log — 2| » approximately,
where d is the distance between centers of the two turns. ‘This
approximation is close only so long as @ is small compared with a.
Similarly M= arr Jog Sa_ 2 and hence
M,—M,= 4na(log 2)
M,—M,= dra log ‘) ss
o L=L,—2M,4+2M,—2M,+M,
=£,—M,—(M,— M,)+(M,— M)—(L— Mh)
= 4m log en ib are[ tow 2—log 3tog 4 for 22=8 turns
p' 4. 2 3
eS) for 22 turns
= 4a) lo} c+i-4]
Baty (73)
6
ae
I.3-5
= 4rd log eta 2 log
where A has the same values as in the case of parallel straight wires
laid noninductively in a plane, provided the length of the coil is
small compared with the radius, so that the approximate formula342 Bulletin of the Burean of Standards. [ob 4 No.2
for M is sufficiently exact. ‘The values of A are positive except for
the end wire and depend on the number of wires and the position
of the particular wire in the winding. If the radius is not large in
proportion to the length of the coil, the constant A is a little less
than for the wires in a plane. It is to be noted that the self
inductance of such a winding does not depend’ on the size of the
wire, but on the ratio @, so that if a fine wire has a proportionally
Pp
close spacing its self-inductance is the same. For a given pitch the
self-inductance is of course greater as the wire is finer.
Taking A for the entire spool as approximately equal to 0.40
formula (73) becomes
L=al [toe g or 5] approximately (74)
where Z is the self-inductance of a “noninductive” winding in a
plane or ona cylinder of any radius, 7 being the total length of the
wire, p is radius and d the mean distance between adjacent turns,
center to center. In practice a’p can not be obtained with great pre-
cision, so that an accurate value of the constant A is not necessary.
Moreover, the precise value of Z for such a winding is seldom or
never required.
A spool of 200 turns of wire with a=1cm, d!p=4,(taking A=0.4)
would have a self-inductance of
L=4ma (log, 4—0.15) x 200
=800r (1.386—0.15)
= 3100 cm= 3.1 microhenrys.
Since deriving the above expressions Mr. Campbell has sent me an
expression for the mean value of the constant A for a noninductive
winding in a plane for any number of wires. His demonstration is
as follows:
Take 2n straight conductors, each of radius p, lying in a plane
with adjacent wires at distance @ center to center as before, the cur-
rent traversing adjacent wires in opposite directions. We may
regard this as a system of x circuits, each consisting of two adjacent
wires. The total inductance will be equal to ~ times the self-
inductance of one of the circuits plus 2 (z—1) times the mutualRosa] Inductance of Linear Conductors. 343
inductance of two adjacent circuits plus... 6...) eee eee plus
two times the mutual inductance of extreme circuits. That is,
per unit of length of the system:
Lan (4 log Sos)+2 (a1) 2 log £3 4-2(n—2) 2 log S54...
(2n— 3) (2n—1)
(2n—2) (2n—2)
nin oe detest) GO) EBT]
or for a total length of wire 7
+2.2 log
bent
e at[toe 4 + rar ae 4) log aus (75)
ad
=al|log 7 41-1
ai[og ¢ +4 log tos 5
4. 0:5772-+ log (7 —
ue *)] approximately (76)
The value of the constant A of formula (71) as calculated by Mr.
Campbell for various numbers of pairs of wires are given in the fol-
lowing table:
TABLE I.
The Constant A for Formula (71)
Value of A by Value of A by
n— Formula (75) n Formula (75)
1 000 10 350
2 144 15 377
3 213 20 392,
4 255 25 +402
5 283 30 409
6 304 100 436
7 319 200 443
8 332 300 446
9 1342 Infinity 452344 Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. (ol. 4, No. 2.
As stated above, the constant A of formula (73) is very nearly the
same as in (71), and hence the same values may be used for approx-
imate calculations.
‘The above results by no means exhaust the subject of the self and
mutual inductance of linear conductors; enough has been given,
however, to serve in some measure as a guide in solving other cases
arising in practice.
WASHINGTON, September 15, 1907.
oO