Strategic Doing: The Art and Practice of Strategic Action in Open Networks
Strategic Doing: The Art and Practice of Strategic Action in Open Networks
Staff Publication 2010-1 Ed Morrison Economic Policy Adviser Purdue Center for Regional Development February 2010
Economies are not just metaphorically like open systems, they literally and physically are a member of the universal class of open systems. Eric D. Beinhocker,
The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity and the Radical Remaking of Economics
The future ain't what it used to be. Yogi Berra Strategic doing guides strategy in open innovation networks As we move into the world of networks, we need to find new ways of thinking together. Strategic thinking and the capacity to translate ideas into action have never been more important. Yet, traditional approaches of strategic planning, developed by corporations 40 years ago, are too slow, too rigid for today's fast cycle world. Command-and-control management styles also don't work very well. Long, drawn-out exercises sap our energy and predictably lead to frustration and discouragement. Networks are different. In a world of open networks, strategy becomes the art of guiding purposeful Effective
conversations.
strategy translates ideas into action quickly, so we can learn what works.
That's what strategic doing is all about. It's a roadmap for guiding conversations to a deeper level very quickly. Strategic doing
balances both open participation and leadership direction. It helps us identify and keep focused on the transformational questions that move people. At the same time, strategic doing is never far from execution: Whats our next step?
www.pcrd.purdue.edu [email protected] A pre-publication draft currently undergoing peer review.
While inflexible approaches to strategic planning are becoming obsolete, we still need practical strategies. We need to find fast ways to link and leverage our assets in order to achieve transformational outcomes. How do we reduce high school dropouts and by 30% in three years? How do we accelerate the number of start-ups in our region by a factor of ten? How do we double or triple the number of health care technicians or machinists we are training? These are the big questions, the transformative questions.
Strategic doing can help us answer them. Strategic doing is a set of principles, practices and disciplines for implementing strategy in a network. Old models of strategic planning were designed for hierarchical organizations, and they do not work well. Strategic doing is different. It guides strategy across organizational and political boundaries with a discipline to build collaborations quickly. Strategic doing answers four questions: What could we do together? What should we do together? What will we do together? When will we get back together? Sounds simple, yet, it is not easy. Too few of us have learned the civic habits of keeping our conversations focused and on track. Too few of us have learned the skills of thinking together. Too few of us follow the handful of simple rules we need to manage complex projects in an open network. This should not surprise us. Hitting a golf ball straight looks easy, but it's not. Cooking a good meal from scratch looks easy, but its not. Like any new skill, strategic doing takes practice.
Here's the good news. Once we learn the discipline of strategic doing, the process of strategy becomes faster, much faster...and a lot more fun. Translating ideas into action is no longer an obstacle, but an opportunity. Moving ideas to action becomes an integral part of how we work together. Once we understand the process, we can move ideas into action quickly. And not just a few ideas. We can move a lot of them. Thats what creativity, innovation and learning are all about.
www.pcrd.purdue.edu
Action plans are still important for a simple reason: We tend to get lost unless we write down our tasks and next steps. At the same time, our strategic plan is no longer a thick dust collector on the shelf. Rather, it becomes a concise guide that quickly explains where we are going and how we are going to get there. Its fast to read and easy to
understand. At the same time, with strategic doing, there is no final strategic plan. Instead, our plans are more like strategic agendas that we can quickly revise to reflect midcourse
corrections, new insights from what we have learned, and new opportunities that pop up from time to time. Learning is what makes strategic doing fun. Making connections, learning, collaborating: this "work" is hardly work at all. It's both gratifying and rewarding, because it takes place in an atmosphere of trust, mutual respect, and enduring relationships. We collaborate and learn from people whom we trust and respect. At the same time, we are willing to share what we know when we sense that others value our insights and perspectives.
Strategic doing is also a skill that we can teach to others, once we have learned it ourselves. So, strategic doing is low cost and scalable. It can become a convenient framework for igniting and managing creative collaborations. We need enduring collaborations to integrate education, workforce development, and economic
development. Strategic doing can deliver them. It helps us set quality standards for our civic collaborations. It becomes how we get stuff done when we venture outside the four walls of our own organizations.
www.pcrd.purdue.edu
There's more good news. Strategic doing is flexible. You can start the process in as little as an hour. Of course, as with most things, more time is better. But in today's world, we need to adjust to the fact that everyone's time is both scarce and precious. So we need to be flexible. We need to be prepared to do our strategic thinking on-the-fly. The Simple, Guiding Questions of Strategic Doing Let's look at more detail to the questions that guide strategic doing.
What could we do together? Strategic doing starts with our assets. Asset mapping is a critical first step, but it is not enough to list our assets. We need to probe. We need to ask questions about how our assets -- our strengths -- could be combined in new and different ways. This step calls us to creativity. We need to see new patterns in our assets, new connections that we could form, new collaborations that align our interests and help us achieve some mutually beneficial outcomes.
During this first step, we gain some insights about the importance of
purposeful conversation. First, we learn that the key to deep conversation is not speaking, its
listening. (Another Yogi Berra quote comes to mind: It was impossible to get a conversation going, everybody was talking too much.) We also learn another important lesson: Our thinking follows the direction of our conversation. Thats why focusing on our assets is so important. Our future prosperity will flow from the opportunities we see by linking, leveraging and aligning our assets. Every person, every organization has an infinite list of deficiencies: things we do not have or cannot do. At the same time, every individual, organization, community
www.pcrd.purdue.edu [email protected] A pre-publication draft currently undergoing peer review.
possesses some clear and unique attributes, a set of assets that define who you are, what you can do, and how you live your life.
To understand the power of linking assets, follow a small thought experiment. Consider a group of three people: you and two of your friends. The combination of your attributes your skills, your experiences, your intelligences -- is unique on the planet. No group has quite the same mix. How can you combine your assets to create something new? Only your friends and you can answer that question, of course. And youll need some deep, engaging conversation to do it.
Now add another dimension: your networks. Each one of you has a group of trusted people in your networks. One of your friends might have a small network, ten people or so. Another might have a network that is considerably larger, fifty people or more. In any case, these networks are also assets on which you can call for an important purpose. Now, we are not talking just about three unique individuals. We are all of the sudden engaging a network twenty to thirty times as large. Our thought experiment started with a small group of three people. Now lets go back and consider what would happen if we started with a community group of twenty, fifty or two hundred. You can begin to see the possibilities that open networks create.
What should we do together? Once we start focusing on our assets and how we can combine them in new and different ways, we inevitably come up with a lot of different ideas about how we could collaborate. We have all been in brainstorming sessions in which we have covered the wall with new ideas. Then reality hits. None of us has the time to pursue all of these ideas. We need to decide. We need to choose one two or three things that we can do together.
Simply choosing is not enough. We also need to focus on defining clear outcomes. We need to distill and integrate our thinking. We need to be clear about where we are
www.pcrd.purdue.edu
heading. We need practical, tangible outcomes. Visions can be vague. Outcomes are not. Theres an important reason to focus on practical outcomes. If we want others to follow our leadership, we will need to explain our outcomes concretely. Most people are intensely practical. They will only spend their time on projects they think can succeed. Our verbal picture of a strategic outcome needs to be specific enough to move people. We need to give people the opportunity to experience our outcomes in their minds eye. They need to picture in concrete terms how things will be different.
Clear, concise strategic outcomes have another benefit. Clarity points us to the metrics we need to measure our progress. For example, if we have a strategic outcome of teaching every third grader to read and comprehend well, we will clearly measure our progress by following third grade reading scores.
What will we do together? Now comes the step of translating ideas into action. To move forward, we need to make mutual commitments. We need to come up with an action plan of who does what, when. Action plans map our path ahead. They are also critical if we are going to enlist the support of others.
By definition, transformation requires us to step outside our comfort zones, outside the familiar patterns of how we lead our lives. People will not move in a new direction without a clear strategic outcome. They need to feel an emotional investment in a strategic outcome. Yet, that is not enough. Before they begin altering old patterns, people also need confidence that there is a practical path to get to our outcome.
People -- rightfully -- see some risk if they are asked to abandon old patterns, old habits, in favor of something new. What if the new path leads nowhere? What if we fail? What if I fail? These are all legitimate concerns. A clear, concise action plan helps us
www.pcrd.purdue.edu
understand the magnitude of the risks we face and make a decision about whether we will personally commit to moving ahead. When will we get back together? An action plan and even executing an action plan is not enough. We need to chart out a process for learning together; we need to create a learning loop. No one is clear what works. What we learn, we learn by doing. So the last question of strategic doing is probably the most important: How will we learn together?
In practical terms, this comes down to answering two questions. First, how we will leverage the Internet to share information and experiences before we meet again? Second, how and when will we come together to assess our progress? To be an effective discipline, we must map a process by which we will reconnect -- both in person and on-line to continue our learning and the strategic doing cycle.
A continuous commitment to learning and sharing also distinguishes the process of strategic doing from traditional strategic planning. In the traditional approaches to strategy, decisions rest in the hands of a few. With strategic doing, decisions continuously emerge through focused conversation and consensus. We listen to opposing views and reach new insights by integrating new perspectives. Then, we move toward action. Consensus emerges from a shared understanding that talking has its limits. If we are going to transform, its less important what we do, and it is more important that we do something.
Consensus does not mean unanimity. It does, however, mean open participation in the process of choosing among alternatives. Not everyone needs to agree, but everyone who wishes to participate needs to be heard. We need full open and full debate of our strategic alternatives. Managing these conversations, guiding consensus, and moving toward action quickly requires leadership direction. So, open participation needs to be balanced with leadership: The ability to see patterns, restate issues, integrate diverse perspectives, and move ahead. Good leaders give voice to new insights. They move us
www.pcrd.purdue.edu [email protected] A pre-publication draft currently undergoing peer review.
toward shared outcomes, and they see the tensions that inevitably emerge as new opportunities for creativity and innovation.
One last point: Throughout the strategic doing process, transparency becomes a critical component of successful collaborations. As trust builds within a community or network, gaining consensus becomes faster. Transparency has other benefits. Not everyone can be everywhere. For people who must momentarily step outside the process -- or for latecomers to a strategic doing process -- transparency helps people engage more quickly. They can quickly make up for what they have missed.
Developing New Civic Spaces with Strategic Doing To promote innovation, we need new habits to think and act together. In region after region, the central challenge involves moving people out of old patterns of thought and behavior. The best way to move past these old traps is to form new collaborations across organizational and political boundaries.
The irony is, of course, that these boundaries are, for the most part, no longer boundaries at all. In a world of global competition and the Internet, traditional boundaries boundaries often drawn decades ago -- simply limit our thinking of what is possible. When you think about it, submitting our thinking to these boundaries doesnt make much sense. Its a little like driving your car by looking in the rear view mirror.
In crossing our traditional organizational and political boundaries, we face some very practical problems, though. Again, it may sound simple, but it is not easy. As a first matter, we often do not have a habit of coming together on a regular basis to explore the big opportunities of transformation. A trusted convener may be hard to find. Or, simply locating a place where people feel comfortable poses problems. More typically, though, we often do not know how to act. We do not behave toward each other in ways that build trust and mutual respect.
www.pcrd.purdue.edu
Incivility emerges in a wide range of behaviors. People withhold information from each other. People may shout at each other. People may simply ignore each other. Recall a time when you left a civic or public meeting angry or frustrated. Now think about the behaviors (not the people) that gave rise to your frustration. Chances are, at the core, someones incivility pushed you over the edge.
The irony, of course, is that we do not have to put up with incivility. We can agree to behave toward each other in ways that build trust and mutual respect. We can agree to follow some simple rules. Its not hard. Libraries do it every day.
Leveraging the Collaborative Power of Web 2.0 Strategic doing is not an event. Its a process. Indeed, with strategic doing, the process is the product. By connecting assets to our emerging opportunities, defining clear outcomes, setting action plans, and committing to learning, we are strengthening the habits we need to build networks and the trust that powers them. The collaborative tools of Web 2.0 -- blogs, wikis, RSS feeds, and others -energize strategic doing.
These tools enable us to collaborate remotely. Web 2.0 unleashes the true power of the Internet its interactivity. Web 2.0 tools make the two way flow of information easy. We can now communicate one-toone, one-to-many and
www.pcrd.purdue.edu
many-to-one. We can embed or stream video and audio files, so that people can be in the room. We can share files and co-author documents. All this power is now in the hands of everyone. These tools are now simple enough for anyone who can type. This interactivity creates profound implications.
Information is freely available, and we can locate just what we need quickly. We can filter vast amounts of information and receive only what we want.
Continuous learning is open to anyone with a connection to the Internet. People with similar interests can now find each other easily. Equally important, these tools enable on-line communities to thrive. They facilitate creativity, collaboration and sharing among members of a community. Strategic doing quickly leads to the formation of new communities. Web 2.0 tools empower these communities to continue their collaborations.
A Deficiency mindset: Focus on what we dont want, dont have, cant do, whats not working & why, what we want to move away from, what we feel constrains us.
Strategic Doing and Regional Leadership Finally, strategic doing requires a different kind of leader, someone who understands the importance of distributing responsibility and decision making widely. With strategic doing, leaders understand that a big part of the job involves helping others to learn. Leaders lead by helping others find and follow their passions. Effective leaders understand that creativity and innovation is not the product of a single mind but the blending of diverse perspectives.
Leaders skilled in strategic doing understand when they must lead from the front and when to lead from the rear. They are comfortable doing both.
www.pcrd.purdue.edu [email protected] A pre-publication draft currently undergoing peer review.
Regional leaders can play a range of roles. The following table outlines the key roles. As we move toward new models of strategic doing, these roles will evolve.
NEW NETWORK LEADER ROLE Convener Connector Civic entrepreneur Guide, mentor Strategist Knowledge keeper Web 2.0 Maven
RESPONSIBILITIES Maintains the civic spaces Links people, networks and assets Sees new opportunities Maps a complex process Reveals larger patterns Distills face-to-face conversations into key points and patterns Applies Web 2.0 power tools
Some Frequently Asked Questions Can I practice strategic doing? You can practice strategic doing with your friends, co-workers and your family. Start a conversation about doing something complex together: a writing project, preparing a presentation, planning a family vacation. Notice how your conversation naturally moves from a general sense of linking together strengths to focusing on the outcome what we want to achieve. We then naturally move to a checklist of next steps. Finally, we figure out when we will next check in with each other.
We are all familiar with the disciplines of strategic doing in our personal life, but we do not naturally apply these disciplines when we are working together. Conversations are easily blown off course and before you know it our time is gone. The key to becoming really good at guiding conversations is becoming clearly aware of the
www.pcrd.purdue.edu [email protected] A pre-publication draft currently undergoing peer review.
direction your conversation is heading. If it is moving off course, you can redirect it by asking questions to raise the awareness of other that Hey, folks, we are off course.
These questions define a strategic direction and action plan for a people in a loosely joined network. By answering these questions clearly and concisely, we are generating all the components we need for a strategic action plan. Why do you say that strategic planning doesnt work?
Strategic planning is a process of strategic thinking and action that was designed for hierarchical organizations. We are focused on guiding strategy in open networks. While strategic thinking and action has never been more important, how we do strategy must be faster and more iterative than a traditional strategic planning process allows. There are a number of other differences between strategic planning and strategic doing, but speed is the core difference.
The biggest challenge comes in defining an outcome. Most people are comfortable talking about their destination in broad, general terms: We want an entrepreneurial community, or We are building a seamless workforce system. These outcomes are too vague to inspire commitment in a loosely joined network. We need specific outcomes. Interestingly, as we get more clarity as we define our outcomes with tangible characteristics our points of potential agreement actually increase. It is a bit counterintuitive, but as we get clearer about where we are going, our opportunities for consensus improve.
www.pcrd.purdue.edu
You can contact Peggy Hosea or Ed Morrison at the Purdue Center for Regional Development. In addition, you might be interested in watching some videos on strategic doing here: http://vimeo.com/channels/strategicdoing
Contacts Contact Ed Morrison or Peggy Hosea at the Purdue Center for Regional Development [email protected] 216.650.7267 or 765.236.0955 [email protected] 888.750.7277 or 765.236.0955
It is the policy of Purdue University that all persons have equal opportunity and access to its educational programs, services, activities, and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, disability or status as a veteran. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action institution. This material may be available in alternative formats.
www.pcrd.purdue.edu