Design of Aluminum Structure

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 29
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses the selection of structural alloys for aluminium structures according to Eurocode 9. It covers important properties of aluminium alloys, their designation systems, and factors to consider when selecting alloys for different applications.

The document discusses both heat-treatable and non-heat-treatable alloys. The main wrought alloys mentioned are EN AW-6060, EN AW-6063, and EN AW-7075 while the main casting alloys mentioned are EN AC-43000, EN AC-46100 and EN AC-47100.

Factors that need to be considered for alloy selection in extruded profiles include strength requirements, achievable wall thicknesses, shape complexity, distortion from heat treatment, and cost. A compromise must be made between these factors.

Design of Aluminium structures: Selection of Structural Alloys

Structural Design according to Eurocode 9: Essential Properties of Materials and Background Information
R. Gitter*), GDA Gesamtverband der Aluminiumindustrie e.V., Dsseldorf/Germany
Paper presented at the workshop in Brussels: EUROCODES - Background and Applications-February 2008

Summary
Aluminium has in fact proved itself as a suitable material for load bearing structures for more than one hundred years. However certain knowledge of aluminium is necessary to design structures. In combination with the materials and material provisions of EUROCODE 9, the task of this paper is to cover the most important aspects needed to design in aluminium. It covers the important differences of physical properties compared to steel which need to be understood to design aluminium structures. It covers the influence of heat on the mechanical properties of aluminium. The essential metallurgical aspects are explained to enable understanding of aluminium's nomenclature system for alloys and their temper designations. It deals with the alloys, listed in EUROCODE 9, gives background information and advice for their selection and application for structures. In particular the topic design of extruded profiles and material selection combined with this is treated in a special section.
1. Introduction 2. Hardening von Aluminium 2.1 General 2.2 Alloy hardening 2.3 Work hardening 2.4 Precipitation hardening 3. Alloys 3.1 General 3.2 Designation of wrought alloys 3.3 Designation of casting alloys 3.4 Numerical and chemical designation of alloys 4. Tempers and designation of tempers 4.1 General 4.2 Tempers of non-heat-treatable alloys 4.3 Tempers of heat-treatable alloys 5. Alloys and tempers listed in EC 9 5.1 General 5.2 Wrought alloys 5.3 Casting alloys 6. Practical viewpoints for the selection of materials 6.1 Sheet, plate and extrusions 6.2 Cast and drop forged parts 7. Physical properties essential for design 7.1 General physical properties 7.2 Influence of heat 8. Application of aluminium in the future

Annex A: Comments and explanations to material properties and material provisions given in EC 9. A.1 Wrought alloys A.1.1 General A.1.2 Tabled values for sheet materials, table 3.2a .A.1.3 Tabled values for extrusion materials, table 3.2b .A.1.4 Tabled values for forging materials, table 3.2c A.1.5 Other provisions A.2 Casting alloys A.2.1 General A.2.2 Tabled values for casting materials, table 3.3 A.2.3 Design and quality provisions Annex B: Drafting extrusion profiles and choice of alloy B.1 General rules for the design of sections B.2 Rules for round tubes and tube like sections B.3 Materials

Acknowledgment and references

Dipl.-Ing. Reinhold Gitter, AluConsult, Kirchstrasse 19, D 78244 Gottmadingen/Germany eMail: [email protected] ;

*)

2 1. Introduction
Engineers familiar with steel charged with designing an aluminium structure are faced with two particularities. The first is the large number of alloys combined with the different so called tempers which are available. The second, and this may be a problem, is the fact, that as either sheet or section only a limited range of alloys are available from stock. An adherent problem is the fact that the range of sections available from stock is very limited and confined to small shapes although a few stockists also have a few medium sized sections. The reason for this is that the processes for producing steel sections usually involves rolling where as in contrast aluminium sections are usually manufactured by warm extrusion. Rolling is characterized by high roll die costs in combination with considerable changeover times and therefore needs large production quantities for economic manufacture of one section. Aluminium extrusion die costs vary between low for small sections and moderate for the large shapes. The quantities to economically produce an aluminium section are relatively small and lie between 200 kg and 3000 kg, depending on size of section. The consequence is that many engineers and companies design their own sections which are specific for the structure and are designed often with a high functionality. Ninety percent of all sections produced by aluminium extruders are individually designed and are therefore only available for the use by the designer/purchaser of the section. This explains the special stock situation which applies to aluminium sections. For the experienced engineer the choice of alloy and temper is not very difficult, especially after the clarification of the following points: Which level of strength is needed? Is high welding strength really necessary? Which form of semi product is needed: sheet/plate/extrusions? What are the quantities needed are they available from stock? Are individually designed sections of quantities sufficient for production? Are filigreed/multi-hollow sections of advantage or needed? Is there a need for high ductility material? Is bendability/formability of sections needed? Is foldability/formability for sheet material required? Is decorative anodisability necessary? Is exceptional good corrosion behaviour required (for special applications)? Are there special requirements with respect to elevated temperatures? Last but not least, what will be the materials cost? There are considerable differences between the various alloys and the semi products and often the engineer is forced to change the design to make cost compromises. This may explain why the engineer designing in aluminium needs to know much more about the material aluminium itself especially when compared to the steel designing process. This concerns also some physical properties which are for aluminium different to steel. The paper deals with all these questions and also gives background knowledge of rules and provisions given in EC9 concerning material. In EN 1999-1-1 in Annex C some information about material questions is already given, these chapters help but are not really enough.

2. Hardening of Aluminium
2.1 General Pure aluminium itself is a metal with relatively low strength. Aluminium in its purest form has a tensile strength of around 40 N/mm and a proof strength of about 10 N/mm. For most technical

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

3
applications this is too low. Aluminium alloys however have been developed with mechanical properties far in excess of those of the base material. In all solid metals plastic flow in the individual crystals of the material occurs along specific slip planes. These slip planes offer the lowest resistance to internal shear stresses and at the atomic level shear movement occurs along these planes without any separation of the material. If a metal is strained over its elastic limit it begins to flow and permanent plastic deformation occurs. When subjected to loads above the material's elastic limit tensile test specimens become longer and thinner. In the material many of such shear planes appear. Since the commercial alloys, when considered macroscopically, are generally fine grained and relatively isotropic, the shear planes are inclined at approx. 45 correspon ding to the plane with the highest shear stress. For the engineer, thinking in mechanical terms, it is easy to appreciate that an improvement of the shear strength should also improve the general mechanical strength of the metal. The idea that this can be achieved by use of structures which act like shear dowels is not so very wrong and is a help in understanding the various differing methods of hardening aluminium. The basic principle is that all types of lattice imperfection can cause an increase in shear strength. 2.2 Alloy hardening A very efficient means of producing lattice imperfections is to introduce suitable foreign elements to the aluminium matrix. To a certain degree their efficacy depends on the difference in atomic radii between the foreign element and aluminium. The relationship between the content of added foreign element and the hardening effect is not linear, as can be seen from Fig. 1.

Figure 1: Hardening effect as a function of the content of alloying element

One of the elements which best suits the requirement to improve strength is magnesium. Therefore aluminium-magnesium alloys were the predominant choice for structural aluminium applications 100 years ago. High strength values in alloys with up to 10 percent magnesium were available. However, problems when hot and cold working these alloys and the less than optimum corrosion behaviour of the alloys with very high magnesium levels, led to the gradual adoption of alloys with lower amounts of magnesium but with additions of manganese. In Fig. 1 the curve for the frequently used alloying element, manganese, is not shown. Manganese itself as a single alloying addition has only a limited importance with respect to hardening. In combination with magnesium, however, it is much more effective. In addition corrosion behaviour is improved.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

4
2.3 Work hardening Plastic deformation produces imperfections in the lattice by massively increasing the numbers of so called "dislocations" particularly along the slip-planes. With increasing load and deformation, additional slip planes continuously develop so that, with the resulting increase in dislocation density, the material develops increased mechanical strength. Parallel to this increase in strength ductility decreases until ultimately the deformation process has to be stopped. When cold rolling, this, so called "work hardening or "strain hardening", continues until the material begins to develop cracks, usually at the edges of the strip. This phenomenon can be easily demonstrated with a paper clip. Bending to and fro shows an immediately increase in resistance and finally a breaking of the wire. However this hardening process can be reversed by the use of heat. Depending on temperature and time at temperature the gain in material strength can be reversed and return to its starting level before cold working. The material also returns to its original ductility. This thermal process to arrive at a so called "O temper" material is described as annealing. From this soft 'O' state the cold working processes can be restarted. In industrial production the procedure may be repeated several times to produce very thin material from what was originally a thick slab of metal. Fig. 2 shows the process of cold working and annealing, here as a function of time at constant temperature. In the literature you may also find diagrams which show annealing as a function of the level of the applied temperature. It is typical for the cold working effect that the first stages of cold working have the greatest effect on material strength.

Figure 2: Strength as a function of the degree of cold work and annealing temperature respectively

Figure 3: Strength in function of time at ambient and elevated temperature

2.4 Precipitation hardening The effect of precipitation hardening was first used practically in 1906 by Wilm. The effect is caused by the fact, that one or more suitable elements with each other or together with the matrix material aluminium are able to form particles, so called intermetallic compounds. They constitute also lattice imperfections and depending on the size of these particles and their uniform distribution they cause a remarkable increase of strength. The whole process begins with a solution heat-treatment i.e. all alloying elements are in solution (solid solution), after that a quenching is necessary to get a uniform distribution of all elements also at ambient temperature. After that the involved elements begin to move in the aluminium matrix, they unify to intermetallic compounds and grow. This happens at room temperature but with more efficiency at elevated temperatures (natural ageing and artificial ageing). It is important to know that the hardening effects due to precipitations can go down if too high temperatures are acting a short time on the material or if temperatures of moderate height are acting a long time. Fig. 3 shows the process of ageing. It is typical that the natural ageing begins immediately after quenching with a relatively high speed but degressive and asymptotically approaching to an upper limit (T4). Depending on the alloy this may need weeks, but for most alloys the process may be regarded as finished after one week. After a certain time, (hours, few days) mostly depend-

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

5
ing on manufacturing conditions, the material to be artificially aged is brought into a furnace, whereby the ageing can be executed under really different temperature conditions. Typical for all temperatures is a quick hardening regressively going to a summit (T6), which, depending on temperature, may be very flat. If the temperature acts longer time, the effect of the precipitations on strength goes down and we get an over-aged temper (T7). In this stage the material shows some improved physical properties. Better ductility, corrosion resistance (some copper and/or zinc containing alloys) and better electrical conductivity. It must be said that the diagram is without scale and the abscissa shall not be seen linear. The duration of the different phases may be very different depending on the alloy and thermal conditions.

3. Alloys
3.1 General In practice only a few elements have been proven to be really suitable as alloying additions in aluminium wrought and cast materials for structural applications. These are: Magnesium (Mg) Silicon (Si) Manganese (Mn) Copper (Cu) Zinc (Zn) They can be used as single elements and also in combinations. The very limited series of alloy families which result are shown in Table 1 for wrought alloys and Table 2 for casting alloys, where different alloy families are important. Working with aluminium it is necessary to know the nomenclature used with this material. This refers to the designation of the alloys in use and also to the temper states in which they are supplied to the market.
Mn Mn
AlMn 3xxx AlMgMn 5xxx AlMg 5xxx AlSiMg 6xxx AlZnMg AlMgSi 6xxx AlSi 4xxx

Mg

Si

Zn Mn

Mn

Mg

Si

Zn

Cu

Mg

Mg

AlMg 5xxxx AlSiMg 4xxxx AlZnMg 7xxxx AlCu 2xxxx AlSi 44xxx AlSiCu 4xxxx

Si

Si

Zn

AlZnMgCu 7xxx AlCuMg 2xxx

Zn

Cu

Cu Table 2 Casting alloy families

Table 1 Wrought alloy families

3.2 Designation of wrought alloys The system of designation of the Aluminium Association (AA) in the USA is today the most generally used system. The European standards also follow this nomenclature. It makes use of a 4 digit number for the designation of an alloy, in special cases the 4 digits can be followed by a letter (A, B, C,..). The family or the most important alloying element is characterised by the first digit. Table 1 shows under the chemical symbol the corresponding numerical designation.
R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

6
The families not listed in the table are the 1xxx, 8xxx and 9xxx series of alloys: The 1xxx series designation concerns unalloyed aluminium materials which are distinguished according to their degree of purity. The 8xxx series designations are for miscellaneous types of alloys (i.e. Fe alloys) which cannot be grouped in the other families. 9xxx series designations are not used. The first digit gives basic information about the principal alloying element(s): 2xxx: Copper 3xxx Manganese 4xxx Silicon 5xxx Magnesium 6xxx Magnesium and Silicon 7xxx Zinc The designation system also says something about the hardening of the alloys belonging to a family. The 1xxx, 3xxx and 5xxx series are so called non-heat-treatable alloys; they gain their strength by alloying (e.g. increasing content of Mg) and work hardening. The 2xxx, 6xxx and 7xxx series are heat-treatable alloys, which gain their strength by alloying but make use of precipitation hardening as the main mechanism. Work hardening in normal production is not used. The 4xxx and 8xxx series of alloys cannot be characterised so easily. All three methods of hardening may be found in these groups depending on the alloy type. 3.3 Designation of casting alloys For cast products quite different alloys are preferred. Casters prefer type 4xxxx alloys with high silicon content, since with these alloys good quality is easily produced. Casting alloys designations have the prefix "EN AC-" to distinguish them from wrought alloys and have in total 5 digits. The system is originated in Europe and not in the USA. The first digit means the same as for wrought alloys, i.e. it defines the principal alloying element. There is however a difference concerning casting alloys with magnesium and silicon additions made to develop hardening effects and hence higher mechanical properties, through controlled precipitation of the magnesium silicide phase. In casting alloys higher levels of silicon are of benefit in reducing the tendency to shrinkage cracking. Therefore, even in the magnesium silicide phase hardening casting alloys, silicon is well in excess of other elements. The logic of the designation system therefore requires that these alloys have a "4" as first digit in contrast to the magnesium silicide hardening wrought alloys which have a "6" as first digit. In the 4xxxx series we find mainly heat-treatable alloys with subgroup 44xxx which are nonheat-treatable alloys, because they only have silicon as the main alloying element. A second group of non-heat-treatable alloys is the group with Mg as single main alloying element, designated the 5xxxx group. Work hardening for casting is not relevant. 3.4 Numerical and chemical designation of alloys In former times many standards did use designations based on chemical symbols. For the engineer unfamiliar with aluminium alloys this was an advantage. He could judge an alloy with such a designation much more easily in terms of its strength, method of hardening, weldability and behaviour under different atmospheric conditions.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

7
Numerical designation EN AW3004 3005 3103 5005/5005A 5049 5052 5083 5454 5754 6060 6061 6063 6005A 6082 6106 7020 8011A chemical designation EN AWsheet X AlMn1Mg1 X AlMn1Mg0,5 X AlMn1 X AlMg1(B)/(C) X AlMg2Mn0,8 X AlMg2,5 X AlMg4,5Mn0,7 X AlMg3Mn X AlMg3 AlMgSi X AlMg1SiCu AlMg0,7Si AlSiMg(A) X AlSi1MgMn AlMgSiMn X AlZn4,5Mg1 X AlFeSi numerical designation 3003 3004 * 3005 * 3103 * 3105 5005 * 5052 * 5251 chemical designation AlMn1Cu AlMn1Mg1 AlMn1Mg0,5 AlMn1 AlMn0,5Mg0,5 AlMg1(B) AlMg2,5 AlMg2

extrusion

forgings

X X X X X X X X X X

X X

Table 3.b Wrought aluminium alloys listed in EN 1999-1-4


(* : alloy also listed in EN 1999-1-1)

EN AC42100 42200 43000 43300 44200 51300

EN ACAlSi7Mg0,3 AlSi7Mg0,6 AlSi10Mg(a) AlSi9Mg AlSi12(a) AlMg5

Table 3a: Wrought alloys listed in EN 1999-1-1 and the form of standardised semi products (tables 3.2a-c)

Table 3c: Casting aluminium alloys listed in EN 1999-1-1

This is the reason, why the European Aluminium Standards still use two principles for aluminium alloy designation: numerical and with chemical symbols. Table 3a shows the alloys which are foreseen for use for structural applications in EN 1999-1-1. In Table 3b are listed the alloys for structural thin sheeting: EN 1999-1-4, and in Table 3c the alloys suitable for structural castings. The figures in the chemical designation stand for the typical content of the alloying element in the alloy. The correct designation according to the European standards always includes the prefix EN AW-. Colloquial this prefix will often not used, but in written text, e.g. in orders, it may be important, since still other 4 digit designation systems exist in different areas of the world, especially in aluminium companies

4. Tempers and Designation of Tempers


4.1 General It is very typical for aluminium and a new experience for the structural steel using engineer that the materials are available with different mechanical properties, that is to say in different tempers. In practice the highest strength level may not be the best for a particular application. If material is required for specific forming applications e.g. folding or for structures which will be subjected to impact loads, lower strength material may often be of advantage. The designations of tempers for castings are basically the same. Since no work hardening of castings is performed H- and O-temper designations are not used. The so called temper F is a peculiarity. According to EN 515 it means "as fabricated, no mechanical property limits specified" and insofar it is a state of material preferably destined for subsequent processing and not for direct use in structures. For extrusions this state is the state after the first production step and therefore the resulting semi products can also be used in this state (temper). This is a question of economy especially for non-heat-treatable alloys. These anyway cannot age-hardened and after extruding are in a metallurgical state close to temper O. This material can therefore be used for structures, even if the standardised strength values which are provided are only for information. For sheet in temper F this conclusion is not allowed. According definition, temper F can in this case be a very hard material and therefore not generally suitable for use.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

8
With respect to castings, we have another situation. Temper "F" means only "as cast" i.e. a state/temper with no subsequent thermal treatment. In spite of this EN 1706 defines for such a material (heat-treatable or non-heat-treatable) binding technological values. 4.2 Tempers of non-heat-treatable alloys For many years and in many countries, the system used to characterise the condition, i.e. temper, with which non-heat-treatable materials were characterised, used terms such as: soft, 1/4 hard, 1/2 hard. These designations were very easy to understand and to remember. But this "system" has been abandoned. Looking at Fig. 2 the system can be explained. With increasing degree of cold working, ultimate strength and proof strength also increase. The hardest normally produced state has the designation temper H18 and the former condition hard the designation temper H14. Temper H16 and H12 lie on either side of the H14 temper. Speaking of non-heat-treatable alloys this is not completely accurate*) since a controlled thermal treatment gives advantages both technically and economically by annealing the material from the cold rolled temper H18 into a softer state. This is daily practice in the rolling mills. Therefore the material in the not hard rolled state is on the market in two variant tempers 1x and 2x, e.g. H14 and H24. The two tempers have the same ultimate strength, but H2x material has a slightly lower proof strength but higher elongation. Similar is the situation with 3x tempers. These tempers are characterized by a (gradually) work hardening followed by a stabilizing heat treatment. Residual stresses in this material are then less than in 1x tempers. The 4x temper range has been introduced for materials which are work hardened and then subjected to some partial annealing during a subsequent paint baking or lacquering operation. The technological values of the 4x tempers need not be identical with the 2x/3x tempers. Depending on alloy variant slight differences can exist. Additional digits indicate material properties which are mostly of less interest for the structural engineer. Table 4 gives examples of the definitions of tempers for non-heat-treatable material.
Symbol O H 111 H12 H22 H32 H42 H 14 H18 Description Annealed (soft) annealed and slightly strain-hardened (less than H11) during subsequent operations such as stretching or levelling strain-hardened, 1/4 hard strain-hardened and partially annealed, 1/4 hard strain-hardened and stabilized, 1/4 hard strain-hardened and painted or lacquered -1/4 hard strain-hardened, 1/2 hard strain-hardened, 4/4 hard (fully hardened)

Table 4: Tempers in use for structural application of work hardened semi products (typical examples to explain the system)

4.3 Tempers of heat-treatable alloys The complete heat-treatment consists of a solution heat-treatment, a quenching process and subsequent ageing, where the actual hardening occurs. It must be said that, unlike steel, aluminium alloys are definitely not hard after quenching. To get the highest strength values it is important to keep the material for sufficient time at the correct solution heat temperature and to follow the correct quenching procedure. Depending on the alloy this may be carried out using water or moving air. Quenching with water produces distortion and residual stresses. Alloys quenchable with air have some technical and economical advantages, but the most of the high strength alloys need to be water quenched. If the solution heat-treatment or the quenching process is not properly executed this will result in lower values with respect to mechanical strength and elongation (ductility).
*)

This is the reason that the terms age-hardening alloys and non-age-hardening alloys are more and more used.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

9
Heat-treatable alloys are produced in many tempers. For structural engineering only a limited number is important and listed in Table 5. The wording "solution heat-treated" in Table 5 generally includes quenching. The ageing process should become easily understandable in combination with Fig. 3, whereby T5 condition is not shown. T5 is a special temper which does not lie between T4 and T6 as most people would think. It is characterised by the fact that the material is not fully solution heat-treated (lower temperature) and also that the quenching may be not an optimum. The result is lower strength values than T6 and lower values for elongation (poor formability). T6 characterises an artificially aging up to the maximum strength. For T66 see the remarks in Chapter A.1.3
Symbol Description T4 Solution heat-treated and then naturally aged T5 Cooled from an elevated temperature shaping process and then artificially aged T6 Solution heat-treated and then artificially aged T61 Solution heat-treated and then artificially aged in underageing condiT64 tions in order to improve formability (T64 between T61 and T6) T66 Solution heat-treated and then artificially aged mechanical property level higher than T6 achieved through special control of the process 6000 series alloys T7 Solution heat-treated and artificially over-aged Tx51 These suffixes stand for a controlled stretching to relief internal stresses coming from manufacturing Tx510 (the fourth digit characterises only variants no influence on characTx511 teristic values!) Table 5: The main tempers in use for structural application of precipitation hardened semi products (T7 only listed to explain the system)

5. Alloys and tempers of alloys listed in EC 9


5.1 General In EN 755-2 (extrusions), EN 485-2 (sheet), EN 586-2 (forgings) and EN 1706 (castings) a great number of alloys are listed. Many of them are only used for very specialist applications. A reason for the great number of alloys is that "Inventing" a so called "new aluminium alloy" is not difficult and frequently only involves adjustment of accompanying elements of an existing composition. The advantages often gained are the perfect adaptation of an alloy for a special use by optimisation, for example of: mechanical properties, hardening behaviour, ductility, surface etc. Since the quantity to be cast as pre-material for the working process is also relatively limited, it is not surprising that so many alloys exist. In EN 755-2 (issued in2008) 57 alloys are listed, in EN 485-2 (issued in 2007) 47, in EN 586-2 (issued in 1997) 6 and in EN 1706 (issued in 1998) 37 alloys are listed. It makes no sense to offer so many possibilities for structural applications. The design engineer will not be able to readily select the best alloy from the technical standpoint. The second important question concerning economic availability in the marketplace is also difficult for him to answer. There are also a range of technical aspects which pose problems e.g. the weldability, the effective strength values of the HAZ to be assumed for the design, corrosion behaviour in practice, etc. Therefore it was clear that only a limited number of alloys and tempers proven over the years in practice should be listed in EC 9. It was also clear, that the number would be greater than the list of alloys available in an individual country, since to a certain degree in different lands different alloys and tempers have been historically preferred and are in use. Some alloys however are in general use in most of the countries. This fact has facilitated the task of selection which alloys and tempers should be listed in EC 9. Generally alloys with poor corrosion behaviour e.g. with high copper content were not regarded as applicable for structural works. The situation with casting alloys was easier, since hitherto the most structural standards of European countries had no design rules for castings. To discuss the properties of the listed materials and the provisions with background information

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

10
it seemed better to concentrate this in an annex. So the main part of this paper deals with more generally interesting questions with respect to the selection of alloys. 5.2 Wrought alloys In the ENV*) 1999-1-1, issued in 1998, 11 alloys were listed and apparently this has been well accepted. There were only few comments referring to this topic and only two "structural" alloys have been added: EN AW-5049 (AlMg2Mn0,8) and EN AW-6106 (AlMgSiMn). The number has increased in spite of this to 17 in total, the reason being the new part of EUROCODE 9, the EN 1999-1-4, dealing with thin walled sheeting, which required for its special purpose a series of suitable alloys to be listed. Three of them have been adopted in EN 1999-1-1, since they can also be used for other applications. Three others have stayed listed only in Part 4 and there was no need to transfer them to Part 1 for general application. These are: EN AW-3003 (AlMn1Cu), 3105 (AlMn0,5Mg0,5), -5251 (AlMg2). There may be doubts if there is a need for so many alloys from a technical standpoint. The explanation is that there are many long established products in the marketplace which have approvals by a range of authorities. Changing these alloys would involve much effort and cause many problems. A similar situation to that covered in the previous paragraph concerning the listing of alloys applies to the tempers of the alloys. Allowing all possible tempers would bring the designer in a similar situation as allowing too many alloys. Therefore only the tempers which were most frequently used in the past are listed. These are in addition to O/H111 temper the tempers H12, H14 and their partially annealed corresponding tempers for work hardened materials. Higher strength tempers such as H16 and H18 were avoided, since good forming behaviour is often desired. Temper H16/H26/H36 we find only for alloys preferably destined for thin walled sheeting. The design rules for thin walled sheeting require basically that material with a proof strength >165 N/mm is needed. This means for many alloys listed in EN 1999-1-4 that a temper H18 or a corresponding H28/H38/H48 is required. Since such a hard material cannot be generally recommended, these tempers are not listed in EN 1999-1-1. (There are no problems to list such hard material in EN 1999-1-4, since the machines capable of producing such shapes, e.g. trapezoidal sheeting, are working without damaging the material.) In this context it has to be mentioned, that alloys exist for which the technological values are standardized only for sheet and plate or for extruded products respectively. Therefore in EC 9 there are only a limited number of alloys, which are standardised for both sheet and extrusions and which also have been regarded as useful for structural application in both forms. These alloys are EN AW-5454, EN AW-5754, EN AW-5083, EN AW-6061, EN AW-6082 and EN AW7020 (6 of 17 alloys in total). Since the formability during the extrusion process of EN AW-5083, -5454 and -5754 is very limited and allows only basic solid and no multi-hollow sections, the number of "universal" alloys drops to three. Anyway in the most cases it is not necessary to use only one alloy for a structure. Aluminium multi-alloy structures are normal in practice. After all EN 1999-1-1 offers now a wide pallet of alloys and tempers to be used for structural application. The range of strength in the sense of proof strength Rp0,2 (fo) runs from EN AW5005 O with 35 N/mm up to EN AW-7020 T6 with 290 N/mm. The low strength qualities are normally not important for structural engineering applications but could be used when specially formed structural elements are required. With mechanical strength values of 290 N/mm for EN AW-7020, 260 N/mm for EN AW-6082 and 280 N/mm for EN AW-5083, some structural aluminium alloys lie over the proof strength of mild steel S235. Important for designers are the values for EN AW-6060/6063. These are the most common extrusion alloys because they are very cost effective. The characteristic values of the proof strength i.e.140 - 160 N/mm seem to be low, but under most design conditions they are sufficient for structures.

*)

ENV = European prestandard for subsequent conversion into EN

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

11
The question why EN 1999-1-1 does not list the well known high strength alloys such as EN AW-7075 (AlZn5,5MgCu) or EN AW-2024 (AlCu4Mg1) with 560 N/mm and 450 N/mm for Rp0,2 as used for aircraft can be answered very simply. EN 1999 is principally a design code for buildings even if this standard can also be used for many other applications. In many countries it will become part of legal regulations and therefore other aspects have had to be taken into consideration e.g. the durability and the fact that not all buildings and structures are regularly inspected and maintained. The corrosion susceptibility of the high strength alloys, specifically those containing copper as an alloying element, means that they cannot be allowed for general use. A look on table 3.1a in EN 1999-1-1 shows that, with one exception with respect to the durability rating, all alloys belong to class A and B. The exception is EN AW-7020 and here it is necessary to comment on corrosion resistance. Long time corrosion tests (Heligoland) and also experience show that EN AW-7020 and similar alloys have a corrosion behaviour which, with respect to the appearance of the surface, is at least as good as that of AlMgSi-alloys. If in this table EN AW7020 is downgraded the reason is, that as a result of welding exfoliation corrosion could be provoked, depending on the environmental conditions and the design of structural details (absence of water pockets etc.). This good surface behaviour is not shown by other 7xxx-alloys and also is not present in the 2xxx- alloys due to their high copper content. .A similar situation as for EN AW-7020 is given in practice also for EN AW-5083, which may have in some tempers or gets under unfavourable thermal conditions a certain susceptibility to intergranular corrosion. Therefore we find in table 3.1.a of EN 1999-1-1 a footnote referring to clause C.2.2.2(2) in Annex C, where further information is given. But in the case of EN AW-5083 the durability rating was not downgraded to B or C as in the case of EN AW-7020. For structural engineering the most commonly used alloys are; EN AW-6082, EN AW-6061 and EN AW-7020 (less frequently) for structures and components from sheet and extrusions EN AW-5083 and EN AW-5754 for structures and components from sheet EN AW-6060 and EN AW-6063 for structures and components from extrusions Now in detail: EN AW-6082 and -6061 are the classic alloys corresponding in their proof stress to normal mild steel and therefore preferred by engineers for structures resembling conventional steel work. Semi products are standardised as well as for sheet as for extrusions. EN AW-6082 is the European variant, EN AW-6061 is preferred in America and its sphere of influence. EN AW-6061 contains more copper; this may influence the appearance and the weldability, depending on the actual copper content of a batch. EN AW-7020 is also standardised for sheet and extrusions. It has the highest strength values of the alloys listed in EN 1999-1-1. Since the necessary quenching rate is low, the alloy shows better strength after welding by natural hardening. Semi products from this alloy mean relatively higher prices. The alloy is often applied for military bridges and also for cranes and cherry pickers. Depending on the application a second artificial hardening process is recommended after welding. EN AW-6060 and the similar EN AW-6063 are the typical alloys for extrusion. Sheet in these alloys are not standardised and are also not produced. They show medium strength values and are anodisable for decorative applications. They allow the production of filigree and very complex extruded sections at moderate cost, since high extrusion speeds and air quenching are typical in production. EN AW-6060 is practically unknown in America and it's spheres of influence. In Europe both alloys are available. EN AW-6106 belongs also to this type of alloy but has better welding strength. With this alloy decorative aspect concerning anodising cannot be guaranteed.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

12
EN AW-5083 and EN AW-5754 are the common alloys for the design of conventional structures from sheet. Extrusions in these alloys are standardised but scarcely on the market. The high hot forming resistance of these alloys allows only simple sections with greater wall thicknesses and no hollow sections using port-hole dies. But seamless tubes are possible and available on the market. EN AW-5049, -5052, -5454 and EN AW-6005A are not very frequently used for structural works. Their use is confined to special applications and products/manufacturers. The three 5xxx- alloys combine strength with good corrosion resistance, EN AW-6005 combines strength with good extrudability and this is the reason why this alloy is in very common use for railway carriages. The alloys EN AW-3004, -3005, -3103, -5005 and -8011 are typical alloys for structural sheeting. They are used with low thicknesses and as roll formed products used for roofing and cladding. Often alloys of this group are also used for special faades (anodised, organic coatings). If adopted normally greater quantities of material are needed and the decision as to the best and most economic alloy should be made together with the manufacturer. 5.3 Casting alloys In the ENV-version issued in 1998 only 5 alloys were listed and apparently this was well received. There were some objections against EN AC-43200 due to the relatively high contents of iron with 0,65 % and of copper with 0,35 % which is allowed. It was replaced in the EN version by EN AC-43300, an alloy with the same alloying elements but a reduced content of these two elements (with higher strength and better ductility/elongation). Also EN AC-44100 was replaced by EN AC-44200 for similar reasons: iron and especially copper content are lower with this alloy. EN AC 43000, a very economical and therefore often used alloy, was additionally listed in temper F. Only casting methods (sand or permanent mould) in combination with temper were listed which enable the requirement of 2 % elongation (measured on the standard A5 gauge length) to be easily achieved by the cast house. Concerning the applicability of castings for structural works the prestandard ENV 1999-1-1 had different provisions compared to the revised and now valid EN 1999-1-1. For details see A.2.1.

6. Practical viewpoints for the selection of materials


6.1 Sheet, plate and extrusions When designing in steel the design engineer does not worry about the availability of the steel semi products he intends to use. He can be sure that, as long as he uses such normal steels as S235 or S355, no problems in procurement will exist since the most stockists have a wide pallet of sheet and sections according to the steel section standards on stock. With aluminium the situation is really different. Sheet in small and mid sized format up to 1500x3000 mm are easy to obtain but the availability of more complex alloys and tempers is limited. EN AW-5083, -5754 and -5082 are common. Some stockists specialised as suppliers for shipyards may also have larger dimensions on stock. However most other materials or special formats have to be ordered and therefore will have a delivery time. For the aforementioned common alloys orders of minimum 10 t for one thickness are usually necessary. Sheet in alloys which are not so common used need orders with quantities of 30 to 50 tons (question of casting lot). The situation with sections is different. The reason for that lies in the fact that aluminium sections are extruded and steel sections (mostly) hot rolled. Aluminium sections however are extruded and die costs are modest. Die changing needs only short times and therefore ordered lots may be small, depending on size of the section, between 200 and 3000 kg. This leads to the situation, that most engineers design their own sections optimally adapting them to the special requirements of each application. This brings considerable advantages: cost i.e. weight is

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

13
reduced, the section is given its optimised form in terms of functionality and often machining costs are also saved. This individualism due to the special process of extruding has given aluminium tremendous advantages but also a certain disadvantage. The pallet of sections offered by stockists is very limited and reduced to simple and mostly small sections. The alloys offered are usually EN AW6060 and sometimes -6082. A few stockists offer also larger profiles. With tubes the pallet offered by stockists is much better. Every engineer therefore, beginning his first design in aluminium, is well advised to study which semi products are available from stock. He should especially investigate the possibilities and requirements needed to create and to order his own sections. For structural engineering it is often very important to know what the geometric limits are for the existing production facilities. Sheet and plate can be produced with widths of more than 3 m and lengths of up to 22 m. The exact limits may depend on thickness and alloy. For lengths under 10 m and with widths up to approximately 2 m more manufacturer exist. When designing in sheet it is also important to know, that folding presses with working width up to 16 m are not so common however facilities with more than 20 m do also exist.

Figure 4: Limits for the design of large extrusions (Europe)

The limits for the length of extrusions are 30 m, if they have the necessary stiffness of the section to allow a proper transportation. Normal lengths lie between 6 and 10 m. Normal stock length is 6 m. The limits for the cross sections are shown in Fig. 4. These are the geometric limits of the largest European extrusion press. As already mentioned it is very common that the design engineer creates his own individual profiles. Therefore it is important that he knows some rules about this and also which alloys are recommended with respect to costs and feasibility. Since the main part of this paper deals with more general interesting questions with respect to the selection of alloys, more detailed information is given in Annex B. In this context the cross sectional tolerances play an important role. Since with extrusions they are much smaller than with rolled profiles, the engineer often designs individually drafted sections not only with respect to bearing capacity but also with respect to additional functionality of the section. Then often tight tolerances are needed and for such requirement a special standard exists: EN 12020 which deals with tighter tolerances for sections in EN AW-6060 and -6063 compared to EN 755-9 for sections in the other alloys. 6.2 Cast and drop forged parts Cast and forged parts are always individually designed parts and ordered directly from the manufacturer (if they are not part of a system distributed via stockists). If no special experience exists, it is recommended that the engineer contacts and collaborates closely with the manufacturer to determine the best design in combination with the alloy. To give an idea of the number of pieces which are needed for economic manufacture by forging

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

14
shops, then the number of 1000 may be quoted as the minimum size of a production lot. If the often high die costs are accepted some manufacturers may produce lots with a lower number of pieces, but it may be a problem for the forging shop to get the pre-material from the semi product manufacturer with the form or quantity needed. The alloys themselves listed in EN 1999-1-1 are all common. A similar situation applies to cast parts. Depending upon alloy, foundry and size of the casting the usually minimum quantity is 500-1000 but in special circumstances it may possible to obtain somewhat smaller amounts. Sand cast parts are possible in much lower quantities, depending on size and alloy. Production lots of 10 or 50 are not unusual. The procurement of the casting alloys listed in EN 1999-1-1 is no problem for the foundry, and small quantities can be supplied. The most frequently used alloys are EN AC-42100, -43000 and -44200. The alloys preferred by the foundries due to their good castability are EN AC 43000, -43300 and 44200. The alloy EN AC-51000 (AlMg5) is difficult to cast and therefore not popular with the foundries and is therefore relatively seldom used despite the fact that engineers like to make use of it due to its bright surface and anodisability (other alloys are more or less greyish, especially when anodised).

7. Physical properties essential for design 7.1 General physical properties


The most important property of aluminium is its density, which is with 2,7 g/cm and thus only about a third of the density of steel. The second most important property is the good corrosion resistance of aluminium, though aluminium as such is not a very noble metal. This is due the fact that aluminium and aluminium alloys react with oxygen and water vapour in the air to produce a thin, compact oxide film which protects the underlying metal from further attack. So aluminium and most of the copper free alloys prove to be very corrosion resistant if the pH-value of any contact liquid lies between 5 and 8; with this range the most existing atmospheric/environmental conditions are covered. The linear thermal expansion is with 24x10-6/ twice as large as that of steel. This has to be C taken in account for many structures, where a free thermal dilatation is necessary. Where the dilatation is restricted the resulting stresses are due to the smaller E-modulus only 2/3 compared to steel. The elastic modulus of aluminium is with 70 000 N/mm only a third of the steel modulus. This has essential consequences for the geometry of the design, since deflections of beams, bearing capacity of columns, i.e. lateral buckling and local buckling directly depend on the elastic Modulus. In many cases of structural design the stiffness of a section is the crucial criterion. If a steel section is to be replaced by aluminium and the stiffness kept at the same level, a thickening of all parts by the factor 3 is not very efficient, since the relation of the specific weight of the two materials is also approximately 3. But saving weight by using aluminium is the normal intention, for physical and also for economical reasons. For the design of beams a practical and proved rule says: increase all dimensions with exception of width by the factor 1,4 and you will arrive at a cross section with a moment of inertia about three times as large and hence a section of the same stiffness (E I) and you will save about 50 % in weight. With this rule you have also compensated to a certain degree for a loss of stiffness with respect to local buckling. Experience also says that following such a rule leads to very useful cross sections. Often steel sections are not optimal, since standardized sections have to be used. With an individual design in aluminium often we save more than 50 %. This is also shown in Fig. 5. If we have no restrictions in height and local buckling is not design criterion we can also save up to 60 %. If stiffness of a component is not the criteria and the strength of steel lies within in given values of aluminium then a saving of 70 % may be possible. However this is seldom the case and is the top limit.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

15

Figure 5: Comparison of stiffness and weight per m of steel and aluminium section

These considerations lead us to a second important fact. If we increase the moment of inertia by a factor three and increase the height only by the factor 1,4 then the section modulus (moment of resistance) increases by 2,14, i.e. the stresses in the substitute aluminium section are as result less than half the steel stresses. Now we understand, that the structural engineer should not look at first instance for alloys with the highest strength and this explains why the lesser alloyed AlMgSitypes EN AW-6060, -6063 are so successful. 7.2 Influence of heat As with other materials the strength of aluminium decreases with increasing temperature. Up to certain temperatures this phenomenon is reversible, i.e. after cooling down the material has the same properties as before. With temperatures up to 80 degrees the drop in strength is negligible for all alloys and tempers. Over 80 some des ign situations could require creep effects to C be considered. Heat-treatable alloys begin to loose strength with temperatures over 110 deC pending on time. Non-heat-treatable alloys in work hardened tempers begin to loose strength with temperatures over 150 - also depending on t ime. In 'O temper' non-heat-treatable alloys C no permanent loss in strength occurs. A short heating as used for baking of paints is possible without severe change in properties (for exact thermal conditions ask the semis manufacturer). Much more severe is the loss of strength on welding. Here the temperatures are so high because of local melting that a fall in the strength in the vicinity of the weld must be taken in account and often forms an important aspect of the verification of the design of a structure. The nonheat-treatable alloys loose all strength gained by work hardening and return to 'O temper'. The heat-treatable alloys in temper T6 have a loss of approximately 40 % of their strength with the single exception of the alloy EN AW-7020, which looses only 20%. All these alloys do not go to a fully annealed temper since a certain quenching effect is unavoidable. Therefore standardised strength values for the heat affected zone are based on tests.
Figure 6: Reduction of strength in the heat affected zone (HAZ) (typical for EN AW-6082)

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

16

8. Application of aluminium in the future


With a proportion of 8 % aluminium is, after oxygen and silicon, the third most abundant element in the earth's crust. Today aluminium is exclusively extracted from bauxite but it exists in many other minerals. However today's known reserves of bauxite are sufficient for more than 1000 years at the present exploitation rate. Aluminium is a material of excellent recyclability. The weight losses when remelted and also the degrading of quality in the recycling process are very low. Aluminium has also a high recycling rate. All this will lead one day to a reduction of the exploitation of bauxite, though the quantity of aluminium in use will increase. There are practically no limitations to the availability of aluminium. Many people complain about the high consumption of energy needed to produce a kg of aluminium. This is true but only one side of the medal. Quite apart from the fact, that the energy to produce one kg aluminium has been halved in the last 50 years, aluminium saves energy in our modern technology dominated world. The lowering of weight of modern railway coaches, cars and other transport systems by using aluminium reduces their fuel consumption so that not only the (sometimes higher) purchasing costs but also the relatively high consumption of energy needed for the primarily produced aluminium are compensated. Taking into account the very small quantity of energy needed for remelting aluminium, its often cited disadvantages do not exist. In structural engineering the light weight is not the main reason for the use the aluminium, even if there are many examples where the light weight is advantageous: Cranes, where energy may be saved or a cheaper substructure is possible or when a crane with higher capacity needs to be installed; Marquees, where the light weight facilitates the erecting process and helps to reduce the danger of accidents; Structures to be erected in remote areas, where only air transport is possible; Structures such as scaffoldings, where the low weight allows loading more material on one vehicle or where installation runs quicker. The main reason for the use of aluminium in structural engineering is still its good corrosion behaviour. No coating is necessary under most atmospheric conditions. And the costs and environmental problems which exist when renewing organic coatings are still underestimated. This is seen more and more by municipalities and explains the great number of pedestrian bridges installed in the recent years in Germany with an increasing tendency. Besides the above we also have many structural applications, where, due to the functionality given by the use of extruded sections, the structure is economically competitive.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

17 Annex A Comments and explanations to material properties and material provisions given in EC 9
A.1 Wrought alloys A1.1 General The most material properties given in table 3.2a, 3.2b and 3.2c of EN 1999-1-1 are characteristic values and therefore the basis for the design of an aluminium structure. A.1.2 Tabled values for sheet materials, table 3.2.a of EC 9 fu and fo are values directly taken from EN 485-2 , where they are as Rm and Rp0,2 defined as the lower limit of ultimate strength and 0,2%-proof strength to be kept and confirmed by the manufacturer of sheet and plate. They are often only valid up to a certain thickness or for a certain thickness range, which may be different for different tempers of a material. The reason for this lies in the production conditions. The general question is what can be done if thicker material is needed, but technological values are not specified. This can be answered as following: materials with low thickness limits are typically used and developed for thin-walled sheeting and usually there is no need for thicker material. Materials, which are used for heavier structures, usually have normally standardised thickness range limits, which are sufficient for the most applications. If a manufacturer has to produce thicker material there should be no problem for the use in accordance with EN 1090-3, if the manufacturer confirms the technological values of the adjacent standardized thickness range. If this is not possible, it will be a question of the legal locally existing situation, e.g. if building authorities have to give their approval. The value for A (= minimum elongation of the tensile specimen) is here in table 3.2a mostly given as the A50-value. This means that the gauge length is constant and independent of the cross section area of the tensile test specimen. The resulting figures may cause some irritation for the design engineer, even if A is not a characteristic value for the design. But sometimes the engineer looks for a ductile material. The measuring of the fracture elongation with constant gauge length results in the fact, that, depending on the thickness relations, the fracture elongation of thin material may be much lower than those of thicker material. This is due to the definition. Therefore EN 485 defines, for different material thicknesses, different elongation values. EN has taken over the lowest, for not overloading the tables. If the engineer is interested in knowing the real plastic behaviour he should examine the original EN 485-2 and take the Avalue, i.e. the value for a measurement with proportional gauge length. With this value he can make a comparison with other materials and tempers. With table A.1 and table A.2 the situation may be explained for example with EN AW-5454 (AlMg3Mn). Up to a thickness value of 12,5 mm the A50-value is given and increases with increasing thickness. For a thickness greater 12,5 mm the A-value (=A5,65A0 = A5-value) is given, which is now smaller than an A50-value for 12,5 mm thickness. But this is the actual elongation value for the standardized proportional gauge length A5. The reason, why it is smaller comes from the fact, that the width of the 50 mm gage specimen is always 12,5 mm. A50 and A5 become identical with a thickness of 8,84 mm (=50/5,65). Above this value the A5-value has to be measured according the provisions of EN 485. In the range from 6,0 to 12,5 mm consequently the requirement for the A50 value is valid. In case of weldments the values for fo,haz and fu,haz are characteristic values for the resistance of the heat affected Zone HAZ. For precipitation hardening alloys the values are based on measurements, where a gauge length of 100 mm had been used. For work hardening alloys the ultimate strength values correspond with the value of the temper O (fully annealed). For the partially annealed tempers the yield strength fo,haz is based on a convention. It is 1,25-times the value of temper O. Due to the fact that the yield strength of partially hardened material is always considerably higher than the yield strength of annealed material, only the limited material in the

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

18
heat affected zone deforms, the rest of the material remains unaffected. Therefore this yield strength value becomes independent of the temper of the partially annealed material. For strain hardening material in Temper O no HAZ can exist and the HAZ-values are identical with that of Temper O. The column for the HAZ-factor is only a help for the designer, since the values are directly calculated from the values in the columns on the left of the table by dividing fu,haz by fu etc.. If the thickness of welded materials exceeds the limits defined in the footnote 2) the reduction values o,haz and u,haz have to be calculated for each individual case. The buckling class characterizes "B" materials/tempers with a low proportional strength limit and "A" materials with a high proportional strength limit. The distinction has to be made for lateral flexural buckling, for the calculation of the effective thickness (width) for Class 4 parts according to clause 6.1.5 of EN 1999-1-1. All materials with a standardised fo-value of 230 N/mm and less were classified as "B", with exception of precipitation hardening materials in tempers 6x. These were classified as A-materials such as the other materials with fo >230 N/mm. np is a value needed for calculations in the plastic range of the material taking in account a certain strain hardening due to plastic deformation. The values are (as is required in design standards) conservative but due to the great scatter they cannot regarded as typical values, especially not for calculations of hardening for other purposes. This explains also the text of the footnote 5), that np may only be used with the given values of the yield strength.
np 1), 5

Alloy ENAW
3004

Temper

1)

Thickness mm 1)

fo 1) N/mm
2

fu

A501) 6) fo,haz2) fu,haz2) % N/mm


2

HAZ-factor2)

BC
4)

o,haz

1)

u,haz

H14 | 24/H34 180 | 170 220 1|3 0,42 | 0,44 0,70 B 23 | 18 6|3 75 155 B 25 | 20 H16 | 26/H36 200 | 190 240 1|3 0,38 | 0,39 0,65 4|3 O/H111 35 100 15 35 100 1 1 B 5 50 5005/ H12 | 22/H32 95 | 80 125 2|4 0,46 | 0,55 0,80 B 18 | 11 12,5 5005A 44 100 H14 | 24/H34 120 | 110 145 2|3 0,37 | 0,40 0,69 B 25 | 17 12,5 O/H111 85 215 12 85 215 1 1 B 5 80 5454 B 22 | 15 H14|H24/H34 220 | 200 270 2|4 105 215 0,48 | 0,53 0,80 25 T4 / T451 110 205 12 100 160 0,91 0,78 B 8 12,5 T61/T6151 205 280 10 0,61 0,66 A 15 12,5 T6151 200 275 12 3) 0,63 0,67 A 14 12,5<t100 6082 125 185 260 310 6 0,48 0,60 A 25 6 T6/T651 255 300 9 0,49 0,62 A 27 6<t12,5 T651 240 295 7 3) 0,52 0,63 A 21 12,5<t100 1) If two (three) tempers are specified in one line, tempers separated by | have different technological values but separated by / have same values. (The tempers show differences for fo , A and np.). 2) The HAZ-values are valid for MIG welding and thickness up to 15mm. For TIG welding strain hardening alloys (3xxx, 5xxx and 8011A) up to 6 mm the same values apply, but for TIG welding precipitation hardening alloys (6xxx and 7xxx) and thickness up to 6 mm the HAZ values have to be multiplied by a factor 0,8 and so the -factors. For higher thickness unless other data are available the HAZ values and -factors have to be further reduced by a factor 0,8 for the precipitation hardening alloys (6xxx and 7xxx) and by a factor 0,9 for the strain hardening alloys (3xxx, 5xxx and 8011A). These reductions do not apply in temper O. 3) Based on A ( = A ) , not A50. 5,65 Ao 4) BC = buckling class, see 6.1.4.4, 6.1.5 and 6.3.1. 5) n-value in Ramberg-Osgood expression for plastic analysis. It applies only in connection with the listed fo-value. 6) The minimum elongation values indicated do not apply across the whole range of thickness given, but mostly to the thinner materials. In detail see EN 485-2. Table A.1: Excerpt from table 3.2a of EN 1999-1-1:Characteristic values of 0,2% proof strength fo, ultimate tensile strength fu (unwelded and for HAZ), min elongation A, reduction factors o,haz and u,haz in HAZ, buckling class and exponent np for wrought aluminium alloys Sheet. Strip and plate

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

19
Temper Specified thickness over O/H111 0,2 0,5 1,5 3,0 6,0 12,5 0,2 0,5 1,5 3,0 6,0 12,5 0,2 0,5 1,5 3,0 6,0 12,5 up to 0,5 1,5 3,0 6,0 12,5 80,0 0,5 1,5 3,0 6,0 12,5 25 0,5 1,5 3,0 6,0 12,5 25,0 Rm min 215 215 215 215 215 215 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 Rp0,2 min 85 85 85 85 85 85 220 220 220 220 220 220 200 200 200 200 200 200 A50 12 13 15 17 18 -2 3 3 4 5 -4 5 6 7 8 -Elongation min A -----16

H14

H24/H34

Table A.2 : Excerpt from table 35 EN 485-2: EN AW-5454 [AlMg3Mn] (the columns for bending radii, Hardness HBW and max values for Rm and Rp0,2 are not shown).

A1.3 Tabled values for extrusion materials: table 3.2.b of EC 9 The most of the annotations to table 3.2a are also valid, but some differences exist between the two tables, i.e. the two kinds of semi products (profiles and sheet, two different committees!). fu and fo the values are directly taken from EN 755-2 , where they are defined as Rm and Rp0,2, the lower limit of ultimate strength and 0,2%-yield strength, to be kept and confirmed by the manufacturer of the extrusions. The differentiation of the values with respect to thickness, product form (round and rectangular tube, bar, open or hollow section) is much more characteristic for extrusions than for sheet and plate. To copy directly all the figures of EN 755-2 would have given unreadable tables. The solution was to insert bold figures. A bold figure as a thickness limit means that this range is in fiction the smallest range. This is valid for all forms of extrusions (bar, tube, open or hollow sections) but there may be special extrusion forms for which the defined technological properties are valid for greater thicknesses. A bold figure for a strength value means, that there may be other forms of extrusions for which higher strength values are valid for the same or greater thickness ranges. If the design engineer wants to use the whole field he finds the actual limits in EN 755-2. These facts can be studied for example for EN AW-6060 by comparing the figures in table A.3 with those of table A.4 In this connection it is important to know that under "tube" not only round tubes are understood. Therefore the definition for the term "tube" according to EN 755-1 referring to EN 12258-1 may be repeated: "Hollow wrought product of uniform cross section with only one enclosed void along its whole length, and with a uniform wall thickness Cross sections are in the shape of circles, ovals, squares, rectangles, equilateral triangles or regular polygons and can have corners rounded .". EN 755-2 has a further provision, which may be a trap for the design engineer: For the alloys listed in EC 9 EN AW-6005A, -6060, -6061, -6063 and -6082 the following applies (footnote 3): "If a profile cross section is comprised of different thicknesses which fall in more than one set of specified mechanical property values, the lowest specified value shall be considered as valid for the whole profile cross section." The problem is now that the engineer in the drafting stage is unsure about the strength value he should assume for the design, since in this stage he does not know which shape (i.e. thickness

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

20
of a detail) the section will ultimately have. If the draft is practically complete and he adds a tiny element for his individually drafted section, then this could also change the technological values to be confirmed by the manufacturer and have an influence on his static calculations. To avoid these problems the footnote has been completed with the following text: "Exception is possible and the highest value given may be used, provided the manufacturer can support the value by an appropriate quality assurance certificate." In practice to confirm such a statement is no problem for the most manufacturers. As it can be seen, for sheet and extrusions, strength values normally drop with increasing thickness. This is related to the quality of quenching and/or the degree of working. For EN AW- 6082 we see the opposite. This is not a printing error. It has to do with an extrusion effect, that thinner parts of an extrusion may easily develop a coarser grain structure and this may be combined with slightly lower strength and elongation values.
Thickfo 1) fu 1) ness t mm 1) 3) N/mm2
t 200 t 10 t5 t5 5 < t 25 t 15 t 20 t 15 t3 3 < t 25 t 25 t5 t5 5 < t 15 t 20 20< t 150 t5 5 < t 20

Product Alloy EN-AW form


ET, EP,ER/B 5083 DT EP,ET,ER/B EP ET,EP,ER/B DT EP,ET,ER/B EP,ET,ER/B EP EP,ET,ER/B EP/O, EP/H EP/O,EP/H ET ER/B DT Key:

Temper
O / H111, F, H112 H12/22/32 H14/24/34 T5 T6 T64 T66 T4 T5 T6 T6 T6

A 5) 2) fo,haz4), %
12 6 4 8 8 8 12 12 8 8 14 8 8 10 8 8 8 10

fu,haz4)

HAZ-factor4) BC np 6) 7)

N/mm2
110 135 50 60 60 65 100 125 270 270 80 100 100 110 160 185

o,haz
1 0,68 0,57 0,42 0,50 0,43 0,38 0,50 0,41 0,43 0,91 0,54 0,50 0,48 0,50 0,48 0,49 0,52

u,haz
1 0,96 0,90 0,50 0,57 0,59 0,47 0,56 0,51 0,56 0,78 0,69 0,64 0,60 0,63 0,60 0,60 0,60 B B A B B A A A A A B B A A A A A A 5 14 18 17 14 24 16 12 16 18 8 28 32 25 27 25 22 17

110 270
200 235 120 100 160 120 160 150 110 230 250 260 250 260 255 240 280 300 160 140 215 180 215 195 205 270 290 310 295 310 310 310

140 170

6060

6082

125

185

EP - Extruded profiles EP/O - Extruded open profiles EP/H - Extruded hollow profiles ET - Extruded tube ER/B - Extruded rod and bar DT - Drawn tube 1): Where values are quoted in bold greater thicknesses and/or higher mechanical properties may be permitted in some forms see ENs and prENs listed in 1.2.1.3. In this case the Rp0,2 and Rm values can be taken as fo and fu. If using such higher values the corresponding HAZ-factors have to be calculated acc. to expression (6.13) and (6.14) with the same values for fo,haz and 'fu,haz . 2): Where min. elongation values are given in bold, higher minimum values may be given for some forms or thicknesses. 3): According to EN 755-2: following rule applies: "If a profile cross-section is comprised of different thicknesses which fall in more than one set of specified mechanically property values, the lowest specified value should be considered as valid for the whole profile cross-section." Exception is possible and the highest value given may be used provided the manufacturer can support the value by an appropriate quality assurance certificate. Table A.3 : Excerpt from table 3.2b EN 1999-1-1: Characteristic values of 0,2% proof strength fo, ultimate tensile strength fu (unwelded and for HAZ), min elongation A, reduction factors 0,haz and u,haz in HAZ, buckling class and exponent np for wrought aluminium alloys Extruded profiles, extruded tube, extruded rod/bar and drawn tube. . (the footnotes 4) to 7) are omitted- but see table A.1)

In the table 3.2b we find also a temper T66. This is a speciality in the European standard (it does not exist in the US standard). According to EN 515 T66 is a temper with "mechanical properties higher than T6 achieved through special control of the process 6000 series alloys". In

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

21
fact another route has to be followed. The T66 values can only be reached compared to an alloy composition fit for T6, by a slightly higher content of magnesium and/or silicon. And this is the (hidden) reason, why for EN AW-6060 and EN AW-6063 the HAZ-strength values are slightly higher than for T6. This is important for aluminium design and therefore this fact has also found its expression in the standard.
Temper Extruded tube T4 T5 T6 T64 T66 Extruded profile T4 T5 T6 T64 T66 Dimensions mm 15 15 15 15 15 25 5 5<d25 3 3<d25 15 3 3<e25 Rm MPa 120 160 190 180 215 120 160 140 190 170 180 215 195 Rp0,2 MPa 60 120 150 120 160 60 120 100 150 140 120 160 150 A % 16 8 8 12 8 16 8 8 8 8 12 8 8 A50mm % 14 6 6 10 6 14 6 6 6 6 10 6 6

Table A.4 : Excerpt from table 37 EN 755-2: EN AW-6060 [AlMgSi] (the column for hardness HBW is not shown).

The grey background in some boxes is only to explain the "bold value system". Concerning the elongation values, EN 755-2 (developed by the extruders) has another view than EN 485 (developed by roll product manufacturers). Indeed EN 755-2 prefers in the issue from 1997 the A50-value for thicknesses below 12,5 mm, but also gives, parallel for these thicknesses, the A'-value (=A5,65A0). This latter value has been listed in EC 9, since it means more to the design engineer than the A50-value. In the revised issue of EN 755-2 (issued in 2008) the elongation value A5 is the preferred value and it shall be applied unless there is a prior agreement between purchaser and manufacturer which allows A50 to be used. 1.4 Tabled values for forging materials: table 3.2.c
Alloy EN-AW
5754

Temp er
H112

Thickness up to mm
150

Direction

fo

fu

fo,haz

1)

fu,haz

1)

3)

N/mm

Buckling class
B B B A A

Longitudinal (L) 80 180 80 180 15 Longitudinal (L) 120 270 120 270 12 5083 H112 150 Transverse (T) 110 260 110 260 10 Longitudinal (L) 260 310 6 2) 2) 6082 T6 100 125 185 Transverse (T) 250 290 5 1) o,haz, u,haz to be calculated according to expression (6.13) and (6.14) 2) For thicknesses over 15 mm (MIG-welding) or 6 mm (TIG-welding) see table 3.2.b, footnote 4). 3) A=A5,65A0

Table A.5 : Copy of table 3.2c EN 1999-1-1: Characteristic values of 0,2% proof strength fo, ultimate tensile strength fu (unwelded and for HAZ), min elongation A, buckling class for wrought aluminium alloys Forgings

Compared to the comments for table 3.2a (sheet) and 3.2b (extrusion) no further comment is necessary. The characteristic values correspond to the minimum values of EN 586-2 (issued in 1994). The values for the HAZ are identical with the base alloy in the case of EN AW-5754 and -

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

22
5083. For EN AW-6082 are they identical with those of wrought semi products see table 3.2.a EN 1999-1-1. A1.5 Other provisions In table 3.2.a we find in the line for EN AW-5005 (AlMg1(B)) also the alloy EN AW 5005A (AlMg1(C)). These two alloys have a very close chemical composition and have the same defined values for strength. The latter is not a must for all alloys differentiated only by another suffix A or B or C resp.. The reason for listing both in the standard is the lower values allowed for the impurity elements Fe and Cu, where the limits for EN AW-5005A are lower. For this reason the quality of anodic coatings is much improved. This is often required for decorative faade applications. A.2 Casting alloys A2.1 General According to clause 3.2.3.1 EN 1999-1-1 the applicability of EC 9 to castings is very limited. In fact it does only exist if the design rules in the informative Annex C of EC 9 are applied or are allowed to be applied respectively. This means that the National Annex has to make them binding. In the prestandard ENV not any design rules were given. The provisions were that castings should only be used if their suitability and resistance could be determined and the quality control procedures were to the satisfaction of the engineer. In table 5 casting alloys with different tempers were listed, i.e. more or less recommended and therefore more or less recommended. It was soon clear that such a wide provision could not satisfy the stringent requirements of an European design standard with respect to safety and clear application rules. Therefore the relevant paragraphs were basically changed in "EN 1999-1-1 is not generally applicable to castings." To give now the design engineer a simple possibility of applying castings as load bearing elements in Annex C of EN 1999-1-1 design rules and rules for quality control were formulated, for details see A.2.3. Since the casting process is decisive in determinating the qualities of a cast part, table 3.3 EN 1999-1-1 distinguishes between castings produced from permanent moulds and those which are sand cast. Other processes are not seen as generally applicable for structural parts. A2.2 Tabled values for casting materials, table 3.3 of EC 9 Table 3.3 is very easy to survey compared with the tables 3.2a and 3.2b. No data concerning heat affected zones are inserted, since welding of cast parts is not foreseen due to the lack of data. Also no data are given for buckling, it is assumed that cast parts are compact and lateral buckling does not occur. No data are given for np, since plastic bending of cast parts could not generally be allowed with respect to the relative poor ductility. The values for fo and fu are only 70% of the values listed in EN 1706, since the listed values are those determined by a separately cast test specimen, but the casting itself may have only 70% of this value. A similar situation applies to the elongation values. A test specimen taken out of the casting needs to have only 50% of the elongation value of the separately cast specimen. It is therefore clear that only these reduced values can be taken as characteristic values for design. Concerning the elongation an additional provision has been defined in EN 1999-1-1. Test specimen taken out of the casting shall have an elongation of min 2% with a gauge length of 5,65A0 (=A5).

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

23
fo (foc) N/mm
147 126 168 147 63 147 133 126 56 49 70 63
2

Alloy
EN AC-42100 EN AC-42200 EN AC-43000 EN AC-43300

Casting process
Permanent mould Permanent mould Permanent mould Permanent mould Permanent mould Permanent mould Sand cast Permanent mould Permanent mould Sand cast Permanent mould Sand cast

Temper
T6 T64 T6 T64 F T6 T6 T64 F F F F

fu (fuc) N/mm
203 175 224 203 126 203 161 175 119 105 126 112
2

A50 % 1)
2,0 4 1,5 3 1,25 2,0 1,0 3 3 2,5 2,0 1,5

EN AC-44200 EN AC-51300

1) For elongation requirements for the design of cast components, see C.3.4.2 (1). Table A.6 : Copy of table 3.3 EN 1999-1-1: Characteristic values of 0,2% proof strength fo, and ultimate tensile strength fu for cast aluminium alloys Gravity castings

A2.3 Design and quality provisions The special design rules defined in Annex C are based on the following provisions:
The design has to be based on the linear stress analysis, no plastic flow shall be taken in account. The proof of sufficient resistance of the base material comprises two criteria: Sufficient security against yield strength and sufficient security against ultimate strength. The partial factors may be defined in the National Annex. Proposed is Mo,c = 1,1 (as for wrought material) and Mu,c=2,0, a much higher value, to minimize the possibility of an unintentional plastic deformation. The specification for a cast part shall include information about the zones of the casting concerning the degree of utilization U defined as: design stress/design resistance.

U = more than 70% in tension (areas H) U = between 70 and 30 % in tension (areas M) U = between 100% and 30% in compression (areas M) U = less than 30 % (areas N). For quality control the following rules are to be followed
The location of the maximum stress shall be indicated and also the direction in which the test sample has to be cut. The quality requirements depend on the degree of utilization, i.e. the marked zone designation. Required is a 100% test of each cast part. This requirement seems to be very hard, but is in line with respect to the practice for automotive parts, where 100% tests are normal and do not lead to excessive costs.

The reason for all these special provisions is to the fact, that the ductility of castings is very limited, and the quality e.g. porosity can vary in wide ranges also inside a production lot, depending on the performance of the casting, the casting method and the casting equipment in the foundry.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

24

Annex B Drafting extrusion profiles and choice of alloy B.1 General rules for the design of sections
In principle, extruding functions like squeezing a paste out of a tube (Fig. B.1), a process we are accustomed to do daily. With aluminium only the temperature and the forces must be much higher, and you need a relatively complicated machine to do it: an extrusion press.

Figure B.1: Extruding tooth paste

Figure B.2: Extruding an aluminium bar

An important device in this process is the die. In its simplest form it is a disc with an opening corresponding to the outer contour of the shape of the section (Fig. B.2). This disc has not only the function to give the section its form, its other main task is to withstand the tremendous forces from the stem which produces pressures in the container and so act on the die with several 1000 bar load. The process itself is easy to explain. A preheated billet of aluminium (400 to 550 depending on the alloy) is positioned in a preheated container. Under the forces of the C, stem the material begins to flow through the die and so acquires the form which is defined by the die. Here is not the right place to explain how dies are structured to produce hollow sections since this is relatively complicated, especially for multi-hollow sections Extrusion dies do not only have the function to form the contour of a section. Beyond this requirement they are the bearing structure, to withstand the whole extrusion force and transmit the forces into the supporting elements of the die and the press. These loads, depending on the extrusion press, may be up to 10 000 tons and with pressures up to 8000 bar. The extrusion dies therefore are, made from high-strength, heat-resistant tool steel. The stresses in the die increase with the size (diameter) of the die and its complexity. When large dies are used in combination with high-strength alloys, i.e. hard extrudable alloys, we are often confronted with creep effects in the die steel and fracturing in the low-cycle-fatigue range (one billet is one cycle). Modern dies for complex multi-hollow sections are a confusing mixture of mandrels forming the inner contours, and feeding channels by means of which the material is transported under high pressure. Between all these elements it is necessary to have enough space for the bearing structure with sufficient bearing capacity and stiffness. A lack of bearing strength induces an early breaking of the die; a lack of stiffness has effects on the tolerances of the cross section (elastic deformation of the die). This explains why these items have consequences on the design of a cross section. Therefore it seems impossible to give the layman in extrusion technique complete rules for the section design. However, with Fig. B.3 the attempt is made using examples to transfer a feeling for a good design under the aspect of the requirement of the die-maker. Furthermore the examples in Fig. B.3 are suitable to give a certain overview of the general possibilities of the extrusion technology.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

25

to prefer

to avoid 1 * 2 3 4 5 * 6 * 7 * 8 * 9 *

to prefer

to avoid 10 11 12 * 13 * 14 15 16 17 18 *

to prefer

to avoid 19 * 20 * 21 22 23

24 25

Figure B.3: Examples for basic empiric design rules for extruded sections[1] *) A remark regarding the asterisked examples: The later on mentioned disadvantages or problems are dominating only in connection with large extrusions.

Following explanatory remarks are given to Fig. B.3: 1) Arrange hollows (mandrels) symmetrically, if possible. 2) Open screw channels show a better geometrical accuracy in relation to each other and give a longer life to the die. 3) Peaks should be rounded (avoid filling problems; higher extrusion speed). 4) Rounded corners are of general advantage (longer life of the die). 5) Narrow slits only if unavoidable, otherwise add spacers whereby the tolerances of the opening distance are considerably improved. 6) Alternating long and short cooling ribs improve the life of the die. 7) Contours which are connected with an unfavourable flow of material reduce extrusion speed and induce tolerance problems (for the cross section as well as for straightness and torsion). 8) See 7) 9) The tolerances for polygonal formed open cross sections can be improved considerably by adding stiffeners or by designing a hollow section (disadvantage: higher die costs). 10) In hollow strut plate sections chambers with trapezoidal form (instead of exact triangular form) have the advantage of considerable longer die life. 11) At borings the material should flow around in equal thickness. 12) Small appendices in connection with thick parts of a section are hard to fill with metal and sometimes cannot be extruded. 13) Local concentrations of masses should be avoided (influence on form and tolerances). 14) Chambers should be of the same size and arranged in equal distances over the whole section width.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

26
15) Normal tolerances are hard to keep for wide and curved contours (problems with respect to straightening), fixation of corner points improves the situation considerably. 16) Sections with parts like a squeeze-box are hard to keep within the tolerances. 17) Semi-hollow sections with asymmetric chambers have a shorter die life time and are problematic with respect to tolerances. 18) Too narrow or too deep slits in massive sections should be avoided (the cantilever part in the die may break). 19) The distribution of mass (wall thicknesses) in direction of the general contour should be balanced. 20) Cantilever parts of a die may break when the inner areas of semi-hollow sections are too small or too wide. 21) Protruding elements which weaken the bearing capacity of cantilever parts of the dies are to be avoided. 22) Equal flow resistance along the contour of the section is desirable (with small peaks we have filling problems, massive parts may advance and produce tolerance problems). 23) The combination of thick and thin parts in one section should be avoided. 24) Avoid too thin or too wide walls in hollow sections (denting of such elements, especially when made from alloys to be quenched with water; problems with tolerances, increased waste since defect not repairable). Arrange supporting spacers. 25) Avoid squeeze-box effect with hollow sections, walls running straight forward guarantee better tolerances and also a straightening is possible.

B.2 Rules for round tubes and tube like sections Round tubes (and similar simple sections) may be produced also as seamless sections (production with mandrel). This is done either due to the requirements of the customer or if for technological reasons this method is the only applicable one. An overview of the production possibilities is given in table B.1.
In this table you will also find data which are valid for the production of tubes with special dies with seams (porthole dies). This method is the preferred one, since the geometric varieties are much greater and it is more economic.

Wall thicknesses in case Quenching of extrusion with manmedium drel Designation acc. to EN 573 as example for: num. chem. symb. a = 200 a = 400 EN AWEN AWmin max min max Medium strength, 7020 AlZn4,5Mg1 air 5 8 heat-treatable 6082 AlSi1MgMn water 5 75 8 160 6060/6063 AlMgSi/ air 5 7 AlMg0,7Si High alloyed; 5083 AlMg4,5Mn 5 8 no non-heat5754 AlMg3 5 75 10 160 quenching treatable 5454 AlMg3Mn 5 10 ) ) Low alloyed, 5051A * AlMg2(B) * no 5 8 non-heat-treatable 3103 AlMn1 quenching 5 75 10 160 ) ) 12 1050A * Al99,5 * 5 Type of alloy Alloys

Wall thicknesses in case of extrusion with special dies as example for: a = 200 a = 400 min max min max 5 20 8 20 5 28 8 28 3 30 7 30

-5 5 5

-20 22 30

-8 10 12

-20 22 30

Table: B.1: Feasibility of tubes depending on alloy and extrusion technology [2]. For informative reasons ) data for alloys are given which are not listed in EN 1999-1-1 (* and grey background)

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

27

Tubes are not only means for the transport of gases and liquids or an ideal element for structures (Fig. B.4). Often they are the basis for applications in machinery: tubes are machined or parts are welded to tubes. Here the aluminium section is able to be a real competitor to steel, because a lot of work can be saved and the accuracy of the elements is much higher, due to the complete lack of welding distortion.

Figure B.4: Tubes with integrated additive elements [1]

B.3 Materials
Following on from the explanations in the previous sections of this paper this section deals with the choice of the best alloy for the engineer. It covers strength and thermal treatment, the accuracy of form (cross section and the profile itself in the sense of straightness, etc.). It covers requirements in terms of low residual stresses, but also considers economy, i.e. the cost and consequently the price of the extruded section. Table B.2 gives an overview of the wide range of alloys, but only typical alloys are listed. Besides strength values we find a series of other characteristics of these alloys, such as formability and how easy to perform any quenching process. These properties and characteristics are mainly decisive for the choice of an alloy. Generally, the formability resistance increases with increasing strength. As a consequence, the minimum wall thicknesses of the section are also increasing and the possible complexity of the shape is decreasing. This is why the small thicknesses that would be allowed for static reasons are often not feasible, and when the engineer is forced to define greater wall thicknesses due to other reasons, it makes no sense to remain with a higher strength alloy. Comparing the extrusion speed is most interesting since this has an important impact on costs. Here, the low alloyed AlMgSi types (EN AW-6060, EN AW-6063, EN AW-6106) are generally better than other alloys. Looking further to the feasibility of hollow sections and the formability (this means very thin wall thicknesses), then it is not surprising that this type of alloy dominates in many fields. Furthermore, these alloys have a good corrosion resistance and mostly are excellent for anodisation. The fact that these alloys have only mean strength values is not so critical in practice. Often it is only necessary to choose a higher height of a beam to compensate for the lower strength.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

28
Designation acc. to EN 573 Numerical Chem. Symbolic designation designation. EN AWEN AW6060 6063 6005A 6082 7020 2017A 7075 5051(A) 5754 5083 1050A AlMgSi AlMg0,7Si AlSiMg(A) AlSi1MgMn AlZn4,5Mg1 AlCu4Mg1 AZn5,5MgCu AlMg2(B) AlMg3 AlMg4,5Mn0,7 Al99,5

Temper Rm/Rp0,2 A5 acc. to EN 755 acc. to EN 755-2 N/mm %


T6 T6 T6 T6 T6 T4 T6 H112 H112 H112 H112 170/140 215/160 270/225 310/260 350/290 380/260 530/460 150/60 180/80 270/125 60/20 8 10 8 10 10 10 7 15 14 12 38

Average extrusion Temp. C


480 480 510 520 480 420 420 480 460 440 420

Rel. Extru- Hollow Quenchforma- sion sections ing bility speed with spe- with air resist 1) cial dies
0,9 "1" 1,3 1,6 2,3 3,3 3,8 2,0 2,9 3,5 0,6 (a) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (e) (c) (d) (e) (a) (a) (a) (b) (c) (e) No No (e) No No (b) (a) (a) (b) No(c) (a) No No n. a.

na

1)

kf-value in relation to kf of EN AW-6063 ( = 1 s-1); Remarks: a: heat treatable alloys; na: not heat treatable alloys; Typ. extrusion speed: (a): very high; (b): high; (c) medium; (d): slow; (e): very slow Hollow sections with special dies: (a): almost unlimited shape variableness ; (b): hardly limited shape variableness; larger wall thicknesses; (c):limited shape variableness; larger wall thicknesses; (d): like (c) but higher weight per m; (e): clearly limited shape variableness; larger wall thicknesses, higher weight per m; No: special dies not applicable; depending on shape, hollow sections with 1 chamber with mandrel technology Quenching by air: (a): practically always possible, water only necessary for very thick wall thicknesses (b): in most cases possible, water only necessary for medium wall thicknesses No(c): air seldom applicable, only in special cases No: for full heat treatment water quenching is always necessary n.a.: not applicable; non age hardening alloys are not heat treated; water only due to processing reasons (quick cooling down)

Table B.2 Technological properties of some aluminium alloys.[1] For informative reasons data for alloys are given which are not listed in EN 1999-1-1 (grey background).

So the engineer has always to make a compromise between strength, wall thickness and cost. In cases where the requirement for light weight is absolutely predominant, it may make sense to extrude high-strength alloys with higher wall thickness and then machine down parts of the section to the required shape and wall thickness. Besides the above mentioned restrictions from strength and formability resistance, we also have to look on the consequences which may result from the heat treatment. In the last column of the table we find details of the quenching conditions. When quenching with water (often unavoidable due to metallurgical reasons), we have to accept a higher distortion of the cross section and of the profile itself, and we have to accept higher residual stresses and consequently a higher distortion after machining in cases where utmost accuracy of shape is required. All these are things are aspects which can not often be ignored in practice. Acknowledgment: I should like to thank Robert Dean, deanlightmetals, for help and corrections to my English text of this paper.

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

29 References Standards:
EN 1999-1-1: Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures, Part 1-1 General structural rules EN 1999-1-4: Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures, Part 1-4 Cold-formed structural sheeting ENV 1999-1-1: Eurocode 9 issued 1998: Design of aluminium structures Part 1-1 General rules - General rules and rules for buildings EN 485-2 Aluminium and aluminium alloys Sheet, strip and plate Part 2: Mechanical properties EN 515 Aluminium and aluminium alloys Wrought products Temper designations EN 755-2 Aluminium and aluminium alloys Extruded rod/bar, tube and profiles Part 2: Mechanical properties EN 755-9 Aluminium and aluminium alloys - Extruded rod/bar, tube and profiles Part 9: Profiles, tolerances on dimension and form EN 573-1 Aluminium and aluminium alloys Chemical composition and form of wrought products - Part 1: Numerical designation system EN 573-2 Aluminium and aluminium alloys - Chemical composition and form of wrought products - Part 2: Chemical symbol based designation system EN 586-2 Aluminium and aluminium alloys Forgings Part 2: Mechanical properties and additional property requirements EN 1090-3 Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures Part 3: Technical requirements for aluminium structures EN 1706 Aluminium and aluminium alloys Castings Chemical composition and mechanical properties EN 12020-2 Aluminium and aluminium alloys Extruded precision profiles in alloys EN AW-6060 and EN AW-6063 Part 2: Tolerances on dimensions and form. EN 12258 -1 Aluminium and aluminium alloys Terms and definitions Part 1: General terms Literature: [1] Contributions of the author in Aluminium-Taschenbuch; Vol.3; Dsseldorf 2003 [2] Gitter, R., A. Ames, A. Fellhauer; Stranggeprete Aluminiumgrorohre und ihre spanende Bearbeitung; wt Werkstattstechnik 90 (2000) H. 9 und H.10

R. Gitter; Selection of structural alloys; Brussels 2008; zul. gesp. 29.01.08; zul. gedr.29/01/08

You might also like