Chapter 1 Chem
Chapter 1 Chem
Chapter 1 Chem
Many of these questions revolve around understanding the nature of a reaction, i.e.
which could be
c Vijay S. Pande
October 8, 2004
or etc.
What is the nal result of the reaction (do we get products or reactants and in what concentrations)? How can we drive the reaction in the direction we want? How do these reactions depend on external conditions, such as temperature, pressure, pH, ionic concentrations, etc? How can we quantitatively understand these systems and potentially improve upon them? These are some of the questions that thermodynamics answers. However, thermodynamics does not say anything about time. Thermodynamics will tell us what the eventual result will be, but cannot say how long the reaction will take. However, for the question above, we care more about the nal state than how we get there. In this case, thermodyanmics can yield some very powerful tools to answer these questions.
c Vijay S. Pande
10
October 8, 2004
(a) mg
(Vi,Ti)
T
(Vf,Tf)
(b)
HEAT
V
space. In Figure 1.2: Different paths in both cases, the energy is the same, i.e. independent of path. Path independence is a hallmark property of state functions.
2. state at which the system has minimized its potential energy 3. small changes require the maximum amount of work 4. state at which the system will remain if we wait for a long time To illustrate this, consider a pendulum which has some friction at the pivot point. It will swing for a while, but eventually it will stop swinging and simply rest at the bottom. This is the equilibrium state, since it agrees with the denition above. 1.2.2 Reversibility Reversibility is a very important another concept in thermodynamics which has analogies in mechanical systems. Most processes in life are irreversible, i.e. once changed, the system does not return back to the initial condition. For example When a drop of dye is placed in a bucket of water, it spreads throughout the bucket: it rarely spontaneously comes together to form the initial droplet
If you start out with a deck of cards which is ordered (say by suite and card value) and then shufe the deck, it never (on time scales we live in) comes back to the original order
An example of a reversible system is a pendulum with no friction. In this case, the pendulum will swing back and forth forever. At the top of its swing, the pendulum has the maximum potential
c Vijay S. Pande
11
October 8, 2004
energy and no kinetic energy. At the bottom, it has the reverse: all of its potential energy has been turned into kinetic energy. The reason why this process is reversible is that there is no wasted energy: all the potential energy is turned into kinetic energy and thats precisely the amount of energy needed to bring it back to the top level. A more mathematical way to think about it is the following. One can imagine an irreversible process as follows. Lets say we have two masses and on a pulley. If the masses are equal , then the system is in equilibrium. If one mass is larger by some signicant amount, eg , then the system would quickly change (mass 1 would fall). As the mass falls a distance , this work will be (note that while mass 1 is going down, mass 2 is being pulled up!). However, we could make only a small change in , i.e. , where , then only an innitesimal quantity of work would be required to restore the system. Also, at every point during the reversible process, which is virtually indistinguishable from the equilibrium (since is so small). Thus, to summarize, reversible systems occur in situations when the system is essentially in equilibrium during the transition and at each step, only an innitesimal amount of work would be necessary to truly restore equilibrium. 1.2.3 A mystery unfolds: watching energy isnt enough! Our analogy of a sled sliding down a hill is a good one in many ways, but does seem to break down in certain situations. It is an example of an exothermic reaction, i.e. heat is given off. This occurs in the sled case since the potential energy of the sled is turned into heat by friction. This heat raises the temperature of the surroundings. However, there are endothermic reactions too. In these cases, heat is absorbed (and the temperature goes down) and the total energy goes up. In the sled example, this would be like the sled spontaneously going up hill! Clearly there is something shy here. In mechanical systems, looking for the energy minimum is enough to tell the equilibrium state of the system. Thats not the case in thermodynamic systems. Theres clearly something missing here some concept we need to add in order to explain thermodynamic systems. Thermodynamics has new ways to look at energies which clear up this seeming contradiction. However, the intuition of mechanical systems will still be with us in many ways. In particular, our rst goal is to nd some quantity analogous to the energy whose minimum, in thermodynamic systems, will be the equilibrium state.
c Vijay S. Pande
12
October 8, 2004
6