Oil 2.0: The Rise of India's Middle Class
Oil 2.0: The Rise of India's Middle Class
Oil 2.0: The Rise of India's Middle Class
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
To Our Potential Investors _______________________________________________________________________________ 1 Macroeconomic Market Overview ______________________________________________________________________ 2 Crude Oil around the World _____________________________________________________________________________ 7 Indias Current Oil Situation _____________________________________________________________________________ 9 Energy Subsidy and Price Control within India ______________________________________________________ 12 Indian Fiscal Budget 2013 2014_____________________________________________________________________ 15 Investment Thesis ______________________________________________________________________________________ 16
Overview: Alpha Generation _____________________________________________________________________________________ 16 Cairn India_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 18 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation _________________________________________________________________________________ 21 Essar Oil ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 23 Oil E&P Company Comparisons _________________________________________________________________________________ 26 Essar Shipping ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 27 Great Eastern Shipping ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 30
Page 1
Page 2
This rise in the overall income of Indian citizens has changed their consumption baskets. A research paper titled What is middle class about the middle class by Ester Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee, two professors from the Economics Department at MIT, shows that people who start earning more also start spending more on luxury products that they could not afford before. The main fact that makes the middle class what they are is that they have steady, well-paying jobs. This provides the opportunity to obtain high energy consuming products such as televisions and personal motor vehicles. India is a free market economy, with barriers of entry within the consumables sector being very low. This particular characteristic drives prices lower and makes luxury products more affordable. The preferred vehicle of choice for the middle class Indian is a two wheeler (economically feasible and easy to ride in dense traffic). Figure 3 shows the increase in motor vehicle sales between 2002 and 2012. It can be seen that two wheeler (motorcycle) sales have grown much faster than any other vehicle; this is attributed to a large increase in the number of people who can afford these products.
Page 3
From Ester Duflo and Abhijit Banerjees research paper, middle class Indians tend to purchase products that consume high amounts of energy (petrol, diesel, electricity, etc.) With a large number of people entering the middle class population, Indias current energy profile will need to change.
The graph above clearly shows that Oil and Coal are the two largest sources for energy within the country. We chose to look at the Oil market in particular since the Coal Industry in India is on a serious decline due to environmental regulation and government pressure to reduce the countries dependence on the commodity. However, in terms of Oil, the country is as dependent as every on the commodity, and this dependence is steadily rising.
Page 4
As Figure 5 shows, India has a large deficit in domestic oil production. For the last decade, the rate of production has remained constant, while consumption has been increasing rapidly. Currently, domestic oil is primarily extracted from the Mumbai High (west coast of India). Recent oil discoveries on-shore has moved some of the domestic production towards the mainland. India is the 4th largest consumer of oil products, but it is the 24th largest producer. The task of reducing this large gap falls into the hands of the Indian government. The government has two options in regards to filling in this gap between oil consumption and production: increased domestic production or increased oil imports. The two cases are discussed below. Increased Domestic Production India currently has 5.62 billion barrels of oil reserves as per EIA (U.S Energy Information Administration) estimates for 2009. The oil reserves in the Mumbai High meet 25% of the countrys demand. There are considerable underdeveloped resources located in the offshore Bay of Bengal and in the state of Rajasthan. In 2010, India produced an average of about 33.69 million metric tons of crude oil as on April 2010 or 877 thousand barrels per day as per EIA estimate of 2009. Indias oil sector is dominated by state-owned enterprises, although the government has taken steps in past recent years to deregulate the hydrocarbons industry and support greater foreign involvement. Indias state-owned Oil and Natural Gas Corporation is the largest oil company. ONGC is the leading player in Indias upstream sector, accounting for roughly 75% of the countrys oil output during 2006, as per Indian government estimates. As a net importer of all oil, the Indian government has introduced policies aimed at growing domestic oil production and oil exploration activities. As part of the effort, the Ministry of
Page 5
Page 6
Light Crude Low Density Flows freely at room temperature Low viscosity Low specific gravity High API* gravity due to presence of a high proportion of light hydrocarbon fractions Low wax content Higher price Used to produce gasoline
Heavy crude Higher density than light crude Does not flow as easy as light crude at room temperature High viscosity Higher specific gravity than light crude Any liquid petroleum with an API gravity less than 20 Extra heavy oil is defined with an API gravity below 10 Higher wax content Lower price Used to produce diesel
*API gravity American Petroleum Institute gravity (standard measure) it is a measure of how heavy or light a petroleum liquid is compared to water. If its API gravity is greater than 10, it is lighter and floats of water; if less than 10, it is heavier and sinks) Sweet oil is considered sweet if it contains less than 0.50% sulfur. In comparison, Sour oil contains small amounts of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide and it is commonly used for processing into gasoline, kerosene and high-quality diesel. Before sour crude can be refined into gasoline, impurities need to be removed, therefore increasing the cost of processing. This results in a higher-priced gasoline than that made from sweet crude oil. Therefore, sour crude is usually processed into heavy oil such as diesel and fuel oil rather than gasoline to reduce processing costs. The three major oil baskets are as follows: West Texas Intermediate (WTI): o Extremely high quality crude oil which is greatly valued for the fact that it is of such premium quality, more and better gasoline can be refined from a single barrel than from most other types of oil available on the market o With an API gravity of 39.6 and only 0.25% sulfur makes it a light, sweet crude oil
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
117
Price in USD
97
77
57
37
17 May-99 Oct-00 Feb-02 Jun-03 Nov-04 Mar-06 Aug-07 Dec-08 May-10 Sep-11 Jan-13
Figure 7: Indian Crude Basket compared to WTI, Brent and OPEC prices
Page 10
Price in USD
95 85 75 65
55
45 35 Sep-08 Mar-09 Oct-09 May-10 Nov-10 Jun-11 Dec-11 Jul-12 Jan-13
Figure 8: Indian Crude Basket Price compared to WTI, Brent and OPEC prices (2009-2012)
India currently produces a higher grade oil than what it imports. Domestic oil produced within India is not exported. However, the basket of Indian Crude Oil trades at a premium compared to WTI and at a very slight discount compared to Brent. Diesel and petrol prices in India are linked to international gas oil and gasoline prices respectively, but with a ride: the ex-refinery price is to be calculated on a trade parity bases. The weights given are 80% to import parity (including customs duty, freight, insurance) and 20% to export parity (ex: Singapore free-on-board basis). This was introduced as an incentive to private refiners who helped the country gain self-sufficiency in refining and stopping petrol and diesel imports from Singapore The other two controlled products, LPG and kerosene, do not attract customs duty and are priced solely on export parity, which is calculated at the first of each month. The other oil products are freely priced.
Page 11
Petrol was deregulated in 2010. However, the prices of diesel, kerosene and LPG continue to be regulated. In the case of petrol, Oil Manufacturing Companies (OMCs) can only change the prices every fortnight, and only after taking permission from the government. Diesel, LPG and Kerosene are sold at a lower price than the world price. Diesel is priced at around $0.88 per liter; this puts India within the cheapest 20% of countries for Diesel. The Diesel price in the US is currently $1.03 per liter. The subsidies provided cover only part of the difference between the cost price (including marketing cost) and the selling price, there by resulting in underrecoveries for the OMCs. Under-recoveries are calculated as the difference between the cost price and the regulated price at which petroleum products are finally sold by the OMCs to the retailers after accounting for the subsidy paid by the government.
A large part of these under-recoveries are compensated for by additional cash assistance from the government (over and above the fiscal subsidy), while another portion is covered by financial assistance from upstream NOCs (National Oil Companies). The remaining portion remains uncompensated for OMCs. The Table below shows these values for the year 20102011.
Page 12
Figure 10: Fiscal Subsidy and Under-recoveries for Kerosene and LPG
The cash assistance to OMCs are made on an ad hoc basis, i.e., after the under-recoveries have been incurred. The payments are made at the end of each quarter. Therefore, OMCs often face a shortage of investible funds in the short term. In case of these shortages, companies have to take additional loans to finance their investments.
Figure 11: Compensation for under-recoveries by government and upstream companies from 2008 - 2011
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Considering all the above points, our portfolio will be comprised of the following companies.
Page 17
We see that there is strong divergence in the graph in the year 2010: the year the company ramped up production in the Rajasthan oil fields. This upward trend is bound to escalate before stabilizing since the oil fields have potential for more exploration. The demand will increase in absolute numbers and the Government will prefer domestic exploration given the impact it has on savings, leading us to believe that company is on the crossroads of increased profits.
Page 18
In the year 2013, the company expects to invest close to $1 billion in capital in the Rajasthan oil fields, in addition to the $2.4 billion it has already spent. We feel that a strong cash position (Net $1.54 billion) and a clean balance sheet put the company in a great position to pursue development strategies.
The company has been aggressively expanding its footprint, holding minor stakes in other large oil projects summarized in Table 3 (next page).
Page 19
Oil Block
Rajasthan Oil Block Ravva CB/OS-2 Sri Lanka Oil Field South Africa Gas Block
This data shows that the companys most significant asset is the Rajasthan oil block but it has been aggressively expanding its portfolio while steadily increasing the output from all oil blocks. Another prominent asset the company is developing is the Mangala pipeline that has a domestic refinery penetration of 75% giving the countrys infrastructure a much needed boost. Correlation to oil and currency movement
Table 4: Correlations
Page 20
There is a steady increase in revenue expected in the year 2013. However, the net income is expected to decline since the company received a one-time royalty fee (amounting to approximately $300M) from Cairn India in 2012 that was added to the books. Removing exceptional items, there are strong and growing top and bottom lines. The company added 242.5 million tons oil equivalent (MTOE) in oil and gas reserves during the 2012 financial year. This includes 84.13 (MTOE) in in-place reserves. This gives the company a reserve replacement ratio of 1.79, making 2012 the 7th consecutive year with the ratio being above 1. The organizational structure of the company is shown in the following figure.
Page 21
ONGCs International Subsidiary, ONGC Videsh Limited owns assets of approximately $12 billion, with E&P activities in Sudan, South Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Brazil, Nigeria -Sao Tome, Columbia, West Siberia and Myanmar. Its domestic refinery operations are mainly joint ventures with different domestic and foreign companies. It also owns a 30% stake in the Cairn operated Rajasthan Oil Block. Therefore, this oil monolith has been aggressively expanding its global and domestic oil footprint. It has a stake in most domestic production projects and has played a part in the development of many international projects as well.The company has able management, good political backing and a good executable strategy for the future that will play a large role in the satisfying the countrys demand. Correlation to oil and currency movement
Table 6: Correlations
Page 22
Essar Oil
Exploration
Refining
Marketing
Stakes in three refineries: Vadinar (India), Stanlow (UK) and KPR (Kenya)
The company has a refining capacity of 750,000 barrels per day, which it has been expanding aggressively over the last three years. This aligns well with the Government of Indias vision to make India a global refining hub, filtering crude oil for other resource constrained countries. The companys oil marketing operations have created a large land bank for it. It expects a relaxation of retail gasoline price regulation and a more level playing field for private
Page 23
Figure 18: Financial Highlights Table 7: Summary of Income Statement (in million $)
The figures above show the operation of the company from the 2010 financial year to the first half of the 2013 financial year. We can see that the top line has been steadily increasing. The reduction in EBITDA is due to planned downtime for expansion of refinery operations and increase in oil prices. The average margin per barrel (CP GRM) fell from $4.53 to in 2011 to $4.23 in 2012. The company has stated that this margin will increase as the cost efficiency of the refinery increases. This increase can already be seen from the CP GRM graph. This goes to
Page 24
Page 25
The above graph shows that our companies are fairly valued in comparison to their major international counterparts. Cairn India, ONGC and Essar Oil have trailing P/Es that are lower than the industry average. Reliance, one of Indias biggest companies trades at the industry average. Chevron and Exxon, two large international oil E&P companies, trade at valuations similar to their Indian counterparts. This analysis give provides confidence into the current valuation of our portfolio picks.
Page 26
Essar Shipping is a subsidiary of a stable and diversified conglomerate: Essar Group. Key Operational Highlights Awarded the first runner-up at Gujarat Star Awards in the category Shipping Line of the Year Coastal Operator Successful induction of four STX mini-capes for Essar Group Cargo Successful execution of SAIL (Steel Authority of India Ltd.) & Baosteel CoA (Contract of Affreightment) under current difficult market conditions
Page 27
Risks
Spot markets continue to be volatile, VLCC day rates have started picking up. Essar Shipping is hedged against spot markets volatility through time charters and CoAs (Contract of Affreightment). Financial Performance
Page 28
Risk Correlation (12 month) Oil Price 0.143 USD/INR Exchange Rate -0.023 Due to long term contracts, there only slight correlation between the stock price performance and market movements.
Page 29
Key Operational Highlights GE Shipping has a committed Capital Expenditure (Offshore Business) of around $210M. In 2013, GE Shipping will acquire 1 ROV Support Vessel and 1 Jackup Rig. The shipping fleet has grown 12.5% from 2012 till date
Page 30
Risks Slowdown of demand for Oil Tankers in the United States: GE Ship plans on mitigating this risk by securing long term contracts in India and China as those markets continue to grow. Similar to Essar Shipping, GE Shipping partakes in long term contracts to mitigate the risk of spot market volatility. The company maintains low levels of leverage and adequate liquidity at all points in time. The company also actively hedges the net open FX exposure along with interest rate liability. Financial Performance Q3 FY'13
880.95 773.06 836.44 736.6
Q2 FY'13
Q3 FY'12
Q2 FY'12
441.51 292.65
Revenue
EBITDA
Net Profit
Page 31
Q3 FY'13
14407.43
Q2 FY'13
Q3 FY'12
Q2 FY'12
Q3 FY'13
598.08 263.4 188.36 320.97 63.53
Q2 FY'13
Q3 FY'12
Q2 FY'12
-41.79 -62.23 -192.8 -318.41 From operating activities From investing activities -137.08 -251.25
-29.64 -8.91
Page 32
Q3 FY'13
12.1
Q2 FY'13
Q3 FY'12
Q2 FY'12
5.21
5.81
1.77
1.03
1.01
1.11
1.04
Trailing P/E of 11.23 compared to Industry P/E of 11.77. Earnings per share increased from 5.33 INR in Q2 FY13 to 12.6 in Q3 FY13. Correlation to oil and currency movement
Table 10: Correlations
Risk Correlation (12 month) Oil Price -0.535 USD/INR Exchange Rate -0.361 Due to long term contracts, there only slight correlation between the stock price performance and market movements.
Page 33
Figure 27 shows the implied volatility of front month oil contracts. Given the high volatility associated with oil, we want to ensure that our portfolio is hedged and robust to short and long term oil price movements. We estimate that oil prices will drop between 2% and 5% per year. Our portfolio is hedged against changes in oil prices by shorting USO, an ETF that tracks WTI oil prices in the United States, by 18.75% of the portfolio value. We chose this amount to minimize correlation of our portfolio over the past six months to oil price movements.
Page 34
Figure 28
Figure 29
Historical back test Figure 28 and Figure 29 show portfolio performance against the last six and twelve month oil prices.
Figure 30
Figure 31
Lagged back test Figure 30 and Figure 31 show portfolio performance using oil prices for the period from Feb 24th 2011 to Feb 23rd 2012, with all other prices remaining at their 2012-2013 levels.
Page 35
Figure 32
Figure 33
Lagged back test Figure 32 and Figure 33 show portfolio performance using oil prices for the period from Feb 2010 to Feb 2011, with all other prices remaining at their 2012-2013 levels. RISK SIMULATION As mentioned above, our portfolio allocations and oil hedge were chosen to minimize exposure to the oil price movements. Our current portfolio has a negative 2.6% correlation to USO over the last six months and a negative 15.7% correlation over the last twelve months.
Figure 34
Figure 35
Page 36
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 36 and Figure 37 show the reciprocal case where oil prices drop by 35% in a single day. As above, prices for our companies were recalculated and forecasted based on their individual correlations to oil price movements over the last twelve months. In summary, our portfolio is hedged well against oil prices in order to be robust against the high volatility present in the spot market for oil.
Page 37
Page 38
Figure 38
Figure 39
Historic back test Figure 38 and Figure 39 show portfolio performance against the last 6 and 12 months Rupee exchange rate.
Figure 40
Figure 41
Lagged back test Figure 40 and Figure 41 show portfolio performance using the Rupee exchange rate for the period from Feb 2011 to Feb 2012, with all other prices remaining at their 2012-2013 levels.
Page 39
Figure 42
Figure 43
Lagged back test Figure 42 and Figure 43 show portfolio performance using the Rupee exchange rate for the period from Feb 2010 to Feb 2011, with all other prices remaining at their 2012-2013 levels. RISK SIMULATION As mentioned above, our portfolio allocations and Rupee hedge were chosen to minimize exposure to the Rupee. Our current portfolio has a negative 1.6% correlation to the USD/INR over the last six months and a negative 8.8% correlation over the last twelve months.
Figure 44
Figure 45
Page 40
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 46 and Figure 47 show the reciprocal case where the Rupee gains 35% relative to the Dollar in a single day. As above, prices for our companies were recalculated and forecasted based on their individual correlations to Rupee movements over the last twelve months. In summary, our portfolio is hedged well against the Rupee in order to be robust against currency movements that may erode other gains in the portfolio.
Page 41
Asset
Essar Shipping Great Eastern Shipping Essar Oil Cairn India ONGC Rupee Futures USO Margin Requirements Total
Allocation
16.25 % 22.5 % 40 % 40 % 25 % - 22.5 % - 18.75 % 2.5 % 100 %
Table 11 Notes: A negative allocation indicates our plan to short an asset. USO is the United States Oil Fund, an ETF that tracks US oil prices. Margin Requirements are based on a 5.750 % margin requirement.
Table 12: Portfolio statistics
Long Exposure Short Exposure Gross Exposure Average historic monthly volatility (portfolio) Average historic monthly volatility (SPY) Largest drawdown (last 12 months)
Page 42
Daily Average Trading Amount 925M INR ($1.68M) 954M INR ($1.74M) 55M INR ($1M) 7M INR ($127,000) 1.18M INR ($21,500)
35%
25%
15%
Page 43
Return
5%
-5%
-15%
-25%
-35%
Figure 48: Portfolio return over last 12 months (*NSEI National Stock Exchange of India Index)
Page 44
MANAV BHATIA
TANVEER CHANDOK
RAYMOND DECUIR
Page 45