Harry Marcopolis Red Flags
Harry Marcopolis Red Flags
Harry Marcopolis Red Flags
Issue 2
Fahad Memnon
Tim Robinson
Financial Reform
Joao Marinho
Sammy Sung
David Osborne
The Monetarists
Tim Robinson
Aime Sindelar
David Osborne
Much like any team sport, areas of investment climate. With performances accumulating assets to
factor in many key elements that help skew the the value of $2.68 trillion by the end of 2007, as
game in one side’s favour. Among these are field reported by the 2008 Hedge Fund Asset Flows and
conditions, weather conditions, team Trends Report, the industry appeared set to eclipse
cohesiveness and a matter of luck (though for its inauspicious past.
investments, these aptly apply both literally as Unfortunately, with the world, and more
well as metaphorically). specifically the financial sector, at the mercy of a
The field conditions favoured an array of global crisis: hedge funds were no doubt likely to
hedge funds: lack of industrial regulation and meet their share of problems. As banks entrapped
disclosure requirements coupled with an themselves in a sub-prime lending fiasco, hedge
enormous sum of financial-backing, spells prime funds became sitting targets; namely by Porsche
prospects for any profit-centric organization. and Bernard Madoff.
Moreover, with a growing financial sector and an In late October 2008; to the horror of an
ever-present effort to reduce potential losses in abundance of hedge funds, whom assumed short
market operations, the sun shone ripe with positions on Volkswagen shares (expecting future
opportunity. prices to go down; they in effect opted to sell their
Though provided with a great business shares at higher prices and reacquire them at
environment, hedge funds have been plagued cheaper values), Porsche revealed a 74% stake in
with poor form and horrible fortunes, which for the German motor company. With another 20%
the most part of their 60-year history have denied held by the German state of Lower Saxony, hedge
them consistent top honours. Though ascending funds anticipated a short squeeze scenario given
to great heights is no easy task, ensuring that the only 6% of shares were unassigned. Volkswagen
pressure does not deter you from achieving and share prices skyrocketed as numerous hedge funds
maintaining presidential status is equally vital. sought after covering their short positions and
The hedge fund industry’s history is minimizing their losses. The car manufacturer
highlighted by inclinations to reach high, but subsequently became the world’s most valuable
cursed with near-death experiences; achieving business (through market capitalization),
prominence in the early 1960s by outclassing regardless of peoples’ demand for Volkswagen
mutual funds by double-digit figures yet vehicles as the share price exceeded €1,000. Hedge
incurring huge losses going into the 1970s. funds bawled as they hopelessly watched their
Emerging yet again during the 1980s-90s with industrial infrastructure break down before them.
promising hedge funds, the likes of John
Meriwether’s Long-Term Capital Management
(two years of 40% absolute returns), Julian
Robertson’s Tiger Fund (31.7% absolute returns,
as reported in August 1998), Renaissance
Technologies’ Medallion Fund (averaging 35%
annual returns after fees since 1989) and George
Soros’ Quantum Group of Funds (41% annual
returns after fees for the better part of the 1990s).
Nevertheless, while QGF stirred controversy
within the confines of the Bank of England in
1992 by devaluing the strong pound; the
aforementioned former two (LTCM and Tiger)
collapsed horrendously in 1998 and 2000
respectively.
Today, with the likes of Renaissance
Technologies, Man Group PLC and Soros Fund
Management LLC, hedge funds have acquired a Bernie Madoff, mugshot (US Department of Justice)
fair degree of stability with regard to its business
Nonetheless, with the manslaughter of to protect investors.
Porsche-Volkswagen still in effect, another The hedge fund industry has crumbled yet
calamity arrived in the form of arguably the again, and despite the fact that history illustrates
greatest con in the history of finance. The inevitable resurgence, the question to ask: is this
announcement, in December 2008, revealing Mr. round of trials and tribulations over yet? Or will
Madoff’s business affair, which captivated the mess left behind by Porsche, Madoff and the
countless hedge funds with its low volatility financial sector as a whole result in, as The
appeal, was fundamentally a Ponzi scheme. Also Economist predicts: “perhaps half of all hedge
known as a pyramid scheme; it rewards investors funds [going out] out of business”?
with guaranteed high returns from their own
investment capital. There is essentially no formal Fahad Memon is a Financial Economics
business activity attached to the generation of Student at The City University London.
these proceedings as promised gains fuel
successive reinvestments, allowing for antics to
be carried on for a prolonged period. The list of 1. The Economist, issue 51 of 2008, p.20,
Madoff’s investors, representing a who’s who of “The Madoff affair; Dumb money and dull
hedge funds, as well as other members of the diligence,” paragraph 5, lines 4-6
economy; who adamantly flocked into the trap,
sought little reason to suspect the falsified
verisimilitude. Considering that a former
NASDAQ chairperson was running the ship,
who would question the undertakings? Certainly
not the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), whom felt no sense of
unconventionality as pertained to Bernard
Madoff’s money-making procedures despite
countless ‘red flags.’
Among the hedging victims was AIA
(Access International Advisors), which suffered
an incredible $1.5 billion, including money
personally invested by fund manager René
Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet. Denoting
feelings of grief and responsibility for losing
such sizeable sums from his highly-esteemed
European clients, de la Villehuchet committed
suicide and was found dead in his office on
December 23rd, 2008.
Counting all other individuals and
entities; ranging from celebrity figures like
Steven Spielberg to financial intermediaries,
such as HSBC, and foundations, like New York
Law School (via Ascot Partners), Madoff’s asset
management operations have caused $50 billion
worth of damages. At present Bernard Madoff
faces a lengthy 150-year prison term and $170
billion forfeiture of wealth.
A conspicuous scar has been left on the
reputation of many high-profile hedge funds the
like of Man Group and Tremont Capital
Management whom “charge whooping fees…
largely on the basis of their ability to pick out
clever people to manage their clients’ money.”1
With recent overwhelming debacles, their
unregulated freedom may also be under threat
with the SEC seeking to continue to its aim for
implementing further laws for disclosure in order
Route 66: The Problem of American Infrastructure
- By Timothy Robinson
Stability in the financial services industry is of paramount importance and essential to the recovery
of the real economy. We are currently going through a painful process and although the flaws and
limitations of our system were exposed, the system’s ability to adapt and change is in itself its
greatest strength. Changes in the coming months are expected. The financial services landscape is
very different from 2 years ago and new reform will re-shape it further.
The Web 2.0 has caused business to quietly revolutionize organisations from
within, but it has started to catch the attention of business leaders. According to David
Bailey, of PA Consulting, Web 2.0 has already evolved into a tool that is has proven to be
powerful in product development areas (2008). The concept has received positive
feedback from customers as waiting time has been reduced with the use of wikis. Many
organisations use social-networking sites as a tool for marketing to reach a wider
audience. Record labels use YouTube to evaluate how successful a song is and how
attractive an artist is to a new market. For many artists coming from East Asia, it is
considered a massive challenge to enter the US market. Therefore having a powerful and
attractive marketing strategy could make a difference. Utilizing websites like Youtube
could then prove to be a worthy instrument on testing popularity.
Executives may find that Web 2.0 is already being implemented into their
organisations without them knowing it. It has proven itself to be potential, effective and
powerful to the corporate world. Soon it will be necessary for businesses to implement
web 2.0 as it will become impossible to work without. At the current rate, technology will
begin their next step towards Web 3.0 which Jonathan Richards of The Times describes as
“giving the internet itself a brain”. Intelligent exploiting will soon become crucial for
organisations to keep up with customer demand and it is up to the executives utilize that
and maintain their position on the market.
Sammy Sung is a Business Studies Student of Cass Business School, and the current
President of the Economics Society.
Why, Unlike the Rest of the Civilised World, has the United
Kingdom not Adopted Metric Road Signs?
2.0 F C W - By David Osborne
An implicit cost of not going metric is the waste of the metric education, which has
been taught in British schools since 1974 (Paice 2004). According to the British
Weights & Measures Association, “By the time most young people reach their 20s,
metric education has been replaced by the practical experience of British units”.
(British Weights and Measures Association 2001). This statement is reality. Education
is a benefit in kind and therefore is a burden of the taxpayer. The fact that a metric
education is all but useless on British roads means that the taxpayer’s money is being
wasted. A less subtle cost of using imperial signage is the fact that they have the
potential to result in, especially among the European drivers. There have been
countless news reports of Heavy Goods Vehicles from the Continent striking low
bridges where signs are exclusively imperial, because lorry drivers from the continent
do not understand imperial measures. This costs millions in repairs to bridges, railway
lines, roads and Lorries each year and in extreme cases has resulted in injuries. (UK
Metric Association 2008).
There is no good reason why Britain has not adopted metric road signage. There is
poor excuse that the British population incorrectly view the metric system as a
European Union imposition on British culture. The cost of conversion is also
perceived to be a deterrent to adopting metric signage, but the longer it is left, the
more expensive it will become. The fact that the metric system is the official system of
measurements in the every country in the world (excluding Burma, Liberia and the
United States,) means that it is inevitable that Britain will have to convert road signs to
metric at some point in time (As will Burma, Liberia and the US). Furthermore, the
fact that the Republic of Ireland, Australia, New Zealand and Canada have recently
converted their road signs to metric must infer that there are economic benefits from
the switchover. By clinging on to imperial signage, the UK is doing nothing but
hindering the benefits of being a metric nation. In conclusion, the UK still uses
imperial road signs because there has been no thorough up-to-date research into the
matter, in addition to general political ignorance.
“Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary unemployment rate. Worse, to maintain a rate of
phenomenon. To control inflation, you need to control unemployment below that the of natural rate would
the money supply” require ever accelerating rates of inflation. This theory
- Milton Friedman had pre-empted the occurrence of data supporting it.
“At last, I have discovered the cause of Christmas!” Both this narrative of the power of monetary policy from
- Nicholas Kaldor (Noting that money supply increases in December and Friedman and Schwatz and the existence of a natural
declines in January) rate of unemployment allowed a reassessment of the use
of fiscal and monetary policy. However, this all
T o cover the entire history of the development of occurred against a backdrop of high fiscal expenditure,
Monetarism would be too grand a scope for this article, and the rejection in practice of the monetarist precept to
so it the really should be titled Friedman's Monetarism, have stable, predictable monetary policy (the k percent
or a short history of Modern Monetarism from 1956. rule: money supply should be increased by a constant
Why 1956? That year Chicago Economist Milton percent, irrespective of business cycles).
Friedman published a series of essays, one of which he
wrote titled "The Quantity Theory of Money: A The US had a series of arguably Keynesian Presidents,
Restatement." Friedman set out a version of the QTM, JFK, Johnson and the "Great Society" programmes
which in essence meant that an increase in money (Medicare, Medicaid, the War on Poverty), even to
supply would increase spending, people would not hold Nixon's famous, oft misquoted, statement: "I am a
the additional money in idle balances. Friedman saw Keynesian now in economics". (Less memorable
the relation between money and prices as a uniformity perhaps than Friedman's "In one sense, we are all
on the order of that found in the physical sciences. He Keynesians now; in another, nobody is any longer a
aimed to save the QTM from the "atrophied and rigid Keynesian".) The US Government operating an
caricature" of it; to restore the version that had been expansionist policy, in 1968 Federal spending reached a
maintained in Chicago. then record high of about $180 billion. (With a $25 Bn
deficit). Meanwhile the UK saw the publication in 1959
Money Matters of the Radcliffe Report, rejecting the prescription of a
Two reasons for the growth of Monetarism: one stated steady growth in money supply it set the tone for
by Friedman in his 1967 Presidential Inaugural Address monetary policy in the UK through the 1960s.
to the American Economic Association (AEA): the "re-
evaluation of the role money played from 1929 to 1933". Political Monetarism
What Brad Delong called the emergence " from the old I will end on a short description of the political influence
oral Chicago monetarist tradition of the Great of Monetarism throughout the 70s and 80s. Delong has
Depression era". Not stated in the AEA address is the argued this branch of monetarism differed from its
role Friedman himself played in this. His work with Classical Monetarist cousin: The political form of
Anna Schwartz A Monetary History of the United States Monetarism, Delong argued, believed velocity of money
from 1867 - 1960 was an ambitious project to detail the was stable; that the Central Bank could and should
role of money in the US over that period. This piece, so control money stock, and that fiscal stimulus would not
wrote the journalist David Smith, had the sense of boost demand, unless financed by printing money.
reading a 'whodunnit'.
Finally, in 1976 Jim Callaghan told the Labour Party
The second was the content of the address itself: what conference that Keynesian demand management was
monetary policy can and cannot do. Friedman examined finished, and then the late 70s and early 80s saw the
the negative relation between unemployment and elections of Thatcher and Reagan and the concept of
inflation, famously known as the Phillips Curve. This Keynesian fiscal policy lost its lustre amongst the
relation, which held in the research of Phillips, political class. Thatcher, who said at the Conference in
Samuelson and Solow, began to disappear in the 1970s. 1968 that the essential role of government was
Friedman outlined the theory of a long-run Phillips managing money supply, was able to put this into
curve where the trade-off no longer existed; where there practice.
existed a natural rate for unemployment, as such See Also:
monetary policy had only a short term impact on the 'The Rise and Fall of Monetarism', David Smith.
'The Monetarist Counterrevolution', Brad Delong
Does Monetary Policy Need an Upgrade?
- By Aime Sindayigaya
The current economic crisis is being discussed who can start spending, as a result businesses
over various types of media. However, most of activities increase and the demand for labour and
the time it is difficult to understand what capital rises. One problem with the increase in
solutions have been applied to solve what and money supply is that when it is not well controlled
why. In particular, it is hard to understand why it may lead to inflation. It would be fine if and
the governments decided to bail out only the only if our government could apply the same
banking industry and no other. Why has the strategy and increase the money supply such that
interest been cut to 1.5%? The current spending increases, without rising the rate of
economics crisis is complicated until you listen inflation. What does it take to increase the money
to what experts say about it and read the supply then?
textbooks to get detailed explanations of
economic elements playing a key role in
determining our fate during this uncertain time.
I attended a conference that discussed the
subprime turmoil and the speaker pointed out
that the current economic crisis will never be
resolved wholly by fiscal policy but by monetary
policy. The conference was held at the time the
UK government had just promised to reduce the
VAT to 15%. I did not want to believe that the
speaker was just against the government’s
decision but I left puzzled. The reason I was
confused was that the monetary policy already The Bank of England in Threadneedle Street, London
applied to solving the current economic crisis, England
had not yet given any positive result. The first
banking bail out had already been granted and One of the techniques to increase the supply of
the UK base interest rate reduced from 3% to money suggested in the economics book, is the
1.5% and nothing had changed. More often, we central bank to inject the money in the banks. By
are told it will take time for the effect of the bail October 2008 the UK government had injected
out to show but as I write this, a second cash bail approximately £37 billion into the banking
out is to be issued to the banks! industry in the form of a bailout. Part of the reason
I find out that the monetary policy’s functions such a large amount of money is only granted to
are to control money supply, set the interest rate the banking sector and not to any other sector, is
and ration the amount of credit. Rationing the because the banks have the capacity to expand the
amount of credit involves a central bank money supply. In fact, when banks receive extra
restricting banks' total lending to a certain cash from the Central Bank, they use the fund as a
amount, or reduce lending to riskier customers or basis of credit creation. While this sounds simple,
for non essential purchase and control the level what are the implications of the second element of
of hire purchase credit. This function was the monetary policy: interest rates?
abandoned by the UK government since it
prevented free competition in financial markets. Textbooks suggest that banks’ willingness to take
Consequently, it can be concluded that the only the extra money offered by the central bank
elements of the monetary policy to determine our depends on the interest rate the central bank
fate in this crisis are the money supply and the charges. The lower the base interest rate, the more
interest rate. banks are willing to accept the fund. Each time
An increase in the money supply reduces the money is injected into an economy, the supply of
base interest rate in the money market and as a money is increased whilst the demand for money
result investments are increased. Furthermore, is reduced; and a new equilibrium in the money
the increase in money supply increases real market is formed.
balances, providing surplus cash to consumers
So you can understand the reason for reducing view, banks are concerned with the health of their
the base interest rate when the bail out was balance sheet; that is why banks are very cautious
granted in October 2008. The reduction of the of who they lend to. Even lending between banks
base interest rate by the central bank is not profit themselves is difficult as the LIBOR is above the
oriented; it is a matter of economic mechanism. normal estimated market level. In fact one of the
Sometimes the base interest can be reduced by solutions being studied at the moment by
the monetary policy committee with the governments worldwide is to buying all toxic
objective of increasing borrowing within an assets from banks. There is a hope that this action
economy. In this situation the interest rate is cut will adjust the banks’ balance sheet and prompt
and then the central bank carries out the them to resume lending.
necessary operations to adjust the money supply In conclusion, it is hard to convince people that
so that the equilibrium on the money market normal monetary policy will sort out the current
reflects the newly set base interest rate. This economic crisis. There is a need for the banks,
situation happened in the UK, in November, governments and economists to cooperate on a
December 2008 and January 2009, the interest global basis and design a strong monetary policy
rate was cut to 3%, 2% and 1.5%. The reduction framework which can handle extreme situations,
in the base interest rate also means that the and is still suitable for our modern, innovative
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) used financial sector.
for banks when lending to each other, is
presumably reduced. In normal economic times Aime Sindayigaya is a Postgraduate Student at
the LIBOR is set 0.1 or 0.2 above the base The City University, London.
interest; meaning that at the moment the LIBOR
should be 1.6% or 1.7%, but instead it is 2.17%.
(At the time of writing)
The action taken by the government to bailout
the banks is justified as a way to stimulate
spending in the economy through injecting
money into the banking industry, with a hope
that banks will pass on the fund to consumers as
credit. There has not been any hesitation in the
banks taking the money offered and the Bank of
England cutting the base interest rate to stimulate
borrowing and investment, but yet the banks are
not lending. The question we may ask ourselves
is why the banks are not willing to lend?
One reason might be that banks want to operate
on higher liquidity ratio particularly if they
believe people will want to withdraw cash. This
could be the situation we are in at the moment as
banks fear that what happened to Northern Rock
may happen to them. As a result banks have
probably chosen to hold a bigger portion of
liquid assets in the event of a bank run. Another
possible reason is that banks do not want to be
declared insolvent and end up like Lehman
Brothers; as a result banks must ensure an
adequate and guaranteed level of assets is
maintained against their liabilities by increasing
their deposits and not lending. Many British
banks have written off credit generated from the
subprime lending, hence their balance sheets
have been heavily affected. Therefore, the extra
fund received from the Bank of England may not
be used for credit creation but to fill in the gap in
the banks’ balance sheet created by the losses
generated from the subprime business. In my
St. Thomas Aquinas: was he an economist of our time?
- By David Osborne
Patrick Minford speaks at the University " If the issue was to stabilize the financial
The former adviser to the Treasury Sir Patrick system and prevent a collapse, and get by the
Minford, Professor of Economics at Cardiff point where the market is rattled wondering
University, spoke on the Causes or and the which big institution will go down next, I think
Response to the Credit Crisis in a talk titled on a scale of one to 10 we are very close to 10."
"Looking up while going down: The Causes and
Consequences of the Current Economic Crisis" - Henry Paulson, Former US Treasury
Secretary.
The Schumpeter Online (In a comment to the WSJ CEO Council on
the 17th of November 2008. On the 23rd of
The Schumpeter is now online at November Citigroup was given a $20 billion
theschumpeter.blogspot.com direct investment and the government backed
The Economics Society has also launched a $306 billion in loans and securities.)
Facebook group to provide immediate updates on
events to members. Join us at: "[T]he objective ought to be increased protection
www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=31445513286 against systemic risk, and increased protection
for consumers...So it seems to me that you have
to find the optimum balance between increasing
Hearsay and Anecdotes protections against risk and maintaining the
benefits of market-based systems, as opposed to
the objective of minimizing or even eliminating
risk"
Thinking Inside the Box
The Bentham Project launches a blog.
- Robert Rubin, Former US Treasury
Secretary, at the same event.
The famous 18th Century economist Jeremy
Bentham has been reborn courtesy of a new blog
"Beneath the surface of overall stability in the
from the Bentham Project. Jeremy Bentham will
UK economy lies a remarkable imbalance
offer his thoughts through the website hosted by
between a buoyant consumer and housing sector,
the Nature Network London. Look for an
on the one hand, and weak external demand, on
introduction to the new fortnightly blog at:
the other... a large negative demand shock might
www.ucl.ac.uk/Bentham-Project/info/blog.htm
result in an undershoot of the inflation target for
some considerable time."
"Pay what you want"
London Restaurant runs Freakonomics scheme - Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of
England, in a speech given to the London
The Little Bay restaurant in London ran a scheme School of Economics in November 2002.
offering patrons the chance to decide how much
the meal is worth. The owner, Peter Ilic, provided "The SEC continues to roar like a mouse, and
customers with no cheque giving them the bite like a flea...I gift wrapped and delivered
opportunity to decide whether to pay between a the largest Ponzi scheme in history to [the SEC],
"penny and 50 pounds". and somehow they couldn't be bothered to
conduct a thorough and proper
investigation...[The SEC is] both a captive
Pictures of the Recession regulator and a failed regulator"
Slate Magazine looks for the iconic images of this - Harry Marcopolis, a Private Fraud
recession to go alongside the breadlines and wagons of
Investigator who wrote a report to the SEC
the Great Depression.
www.slate.com/id/2211959/ titled: "The World's Largest Hedge Fund is a
Fraud", in his testimony to Congress in the
Madoff Hearing.