Scientific Research Journal of India (SRJI) Vol-2 Issue-2 Year-2013
Scientific Research Journal of India (SRJI) Vol-2 Issue-2 Year-2013
Scientific Research Journal of India (SRJI) Vol-2 Issue-2 Year-2013
=
L
M M M M
L
L
M
L
In which,
m
A A A ,...,
2
,
1
represent alternatives,
n
C C C ,...,
2
,
1
represent indices, and
ij
x
~
denotes Fuzzy value of the option
i
in terms
of the index j . Verbal variables and Fuzzy
numbers equivalent to each verbal variable
used in this study are presented in table (1).
Table(1)
Step 2: Make normalize matrix decision making
matrix as relation (2) which takes place by means
of relations (3) and (4). Relation (3) is used for
scale less making of indices with positive aspect
and relation (4) for scale less making indices with
negative aspect.
ISSN: 2277-1700 Website: http://www.srji.info.ms URL Forwarded to: http://sites.google.com/site/scientificrji
58
(2) [ ] n j m i r R
n m
ij
,..., 2 , 1 , ,..., 2 , 1 ,
~
~
= = =
(3)
ij j
j
ij
j
ij
j
ij
ij
c c
c
c
c
b
c
a
r max , , ,
~
=
|
|
\
|
=
+
+ + +
(4)
ij j
ij
j
ij
j
ij
j
ij
a a
a
a
b
a
c
a
r min , , ,
~ _
_ _ _
=
|
|
\
|
=
Step 3: calculation and make harmonic normalize
matrix as relation (5) using relation (6).
(5) [ ] n j m i v V
n m
ij
,... 2 , 1 , ,..., 2 , 1 ,
~
~
= = =
(6)
j ij ij
w r v
~ ~ ~
=
At this stage, we need to evaluate indices weights.
To calculate indices weight in this research the
suggested method by Wang and Chang (1995) has
been used. For this purpose, five connoisseurs
have been asked to determine indices importance
with verbal variables. To determine importance of
the constituents and the respective weights, the
respective verbal variables and Fuzzy numbers
suggested by Wang and Chang (1995) have been
used. Table 2 shows verbal variables and Fuzzy
numbers. This method has been used by Wang and
Chang (1995) and Chen (2000), Wang and Elhag
(2007) to determine the indices weights.
Table(2)
Source: (Wang & Chang, 1995; 2007)
Step 4: determining positive and negative ideal for
each index using relations (7) and (8).
(7) ( ) } { m i J j
v v ij j
,...., 1 max
~ ~
= =
+
(8) ( ) } { m i J j
v v ij j
,...., 1 min
~ ~
= =
+
ij
v
~
And
ij
v
~
takes place in three stages and
using the following relations. Obviously, if at both
stages the greatest and smallest Fuzzy numbers are
found, there will be no need for other stages.
Stage 4.1: at this stage, using relation (9) we rank
Fuzzy numbers in order to find its greatest and
smallest quantity.
(9) ( )
4
2
0 ,
~ c b a
A S
+ +
=
Stage 4.2: if at stage one there are numbers which
are placed in one group, or in other words, using
relation (9) we cannot determine their smallness or
greatness relative to each other, we take their tide
into consideration and using Fuzzy numbers tide
we rank them.
(10) ( ) A e
~
mod
Stage 4.3: at third stage, if there are still numbers
which are placed in one group, for their ranking
we consider Fuzzy numbers Domain.
(11) ( ) A
~
Stage 5: distance of each alternative is found
through positive and negative ideal solution. This
is done using relations (12) and (13).
(12)
( )
~ ~
(13)
In which by taking and into account as two
triangular Fuzzy numbers it calculated as relation
(14).
(14)
Step 6: calculation of relative closeness of each
alternative to ideal solution which is done using
Scientific Research Journal of India Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Year: 2013
59
relation (15).
(15) m i
d d
d
cc
i i
i
i
,..., 2 , 1 ,
_
_
=
+
=
+
Step 7: alternatives ranking; at which the existing
alternatives from the hypothetic problem are
ranked in ascending order starting from the most
important.
RESULT:
The questionnaire which had been provided to
the statistical society (32 persons) was analyzed
and 8 indicators were selected for cooling towers
evaluation. Next, 5 connoisseurs were asked to
assign weight to the indices the results of which
are presented in the table below:
Table 1: Weights Indices
Given identification of the identified indices
and weigh of each index, now using Fuzzy
TOPSIS method which has been explained in data
analysis method we prioritize the options. The
following results indicate relative closeness of
each option to the ideal solution.
Table 2: Closeness of Alternative to the Ideal
Solution
RANKING OF ALTERNATIVES:
Table 3: Ranking Based on the Preferred
Alternatives
Check rank the cooling tower can be seen
Tower with a suction fan(A4) rated first and
Tower with a blower fan(A3), Tower with normal
tension(A5), Tower with a Traction stokehole(A6),
Tower with normal tension(A2), Tower with
mechanical tension(A1) were next to the stars.
CONCLUSION:
In this paper, evaluation of level and prioritization
of cooling towers technology based on the
specified indices by experts using ranking method
based on similarity with ideal answer Fuzzy
TOPSIS was investigated. In most of the existing
studies on decision making issue, the issue is
supposed in an environment of definitive data but
in some cases, it is seen that determination of exact
ISSN: 2277-1700 Website: http://www.srji.info.ms URL Forwarded to: http://sites.google.com/site/scientificrji
60
values for the criteria is difficult and the values
should be considered as Fuzzy values. In this
paper, we have investigated the existing options in
Fuzzy environment and based on the Theory of
Fuzzy Sets and then based on TOPSIS method
approach which is a simple method and quickly
specifies the required answer, we calculated the
closest option to the ideal solution.
REFERENCES
Berry, M.M.J., Taggart, J.H., 1994. Managing technology and innovation: a review. R&D
Management 24 (4), 341353.
Bykzkan, G., Feyzioglu, O., & Nebol, E. (2008). Selection of the strategic alliance partner in
logistics value chain. International Journal of Production Economics,113, 148158.
Cantwell, J., 1992. The internalisation of technological activity and itsimplications for
competitiveness, in: Granstrand, O., HakanSon, L.,Sjolander (Eds.), Technology Management and
International Business: Internationalisation of R&D and Technology. Wiley, New York, pp. 7678.
Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using
fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. OMEGA, 35, 417431.
Chang, Y. H., & Yeh, C. H. (2002). A survey analysis of service quality for domestic airlines.
European Journal of Operational Research, 139, 166177.
Chang, Y. H., Chung, H. Y., & Wang, S. Y. (2007). A survey and optimization-based evaluation of
development strategies for the air cargo industry. International Journal of Production Economics,
106, 550562.
Chen, T. Y., & Tsao, C. Y. (2007). The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS methods and experimental
analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems.
Efstathiades, A., Tassou, S.A., Oxinos, G., Antoniou, A., 2000. Advanced manufacturing
technology transfer and implementation in developing countries: the case of the Cypriot
manufacturing industry. Technovation 20 (2), 93102.
F.T.S. Chana,*, M.H. Chana, N.K.H. Tangb .(2000) "Evaluation methodologies for technology
selection" Journal of Materials Processing Technology PII: S 0 9 2 4 - 0 1 3 6 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 6 7 9 8 ,
pp. 330-337
Greenberg, E., Cazoneri, 1995. Change Management: A Survey of Major US Corporations.
American Management Association, USA.
Gregory, M.J., 1995. Technology management: a process approach. Proceedings of the Institution
of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE)209, 347355.
Hackett, P., Gregory, 1990. Investment in technologythe service sector sinkhole?. Sloan
Management Review Winter.
Huang, G.Q., Mak, K.L., 1999. Current practices of engineering change management in UK
manufacturing industries. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 19 (1),
2137.
Scientific Research Journal of India Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Year: 2013
61
Kahraman, C., Beskese, A., & Ruan, D. (2004). Measuring flexibility of computer integrated
manufacturing systems using fuzzy cash flow analysis. Information Sciences, 168, 7794.
Kahraman, C., Bykzkan, G., & Ates, N. Y. (2007). A two phase multi-attribute decision making
approach for new product introduction. Information Sciences, 177, 15671582.
Kulak, O., Durmusoglu, B., & Kahraman, C. (2005). Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection
based on information axiom. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,169, 337345.
Lamb, M., Gregory M.J., 1997. Industrial Concerns in Technology Selection, Proceedings of the
Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET 97),
pp. 206212.
Lei, D.T., 2000. Industry evolution and competence development: the imperatives of technological
convergence. International Journal of Technology Management 19 (7/8), 699735.
McNamara, P., Baden-Fuller, C., 1999. Lessons from the Celltech case:balancing knowledge
exploration and exploitation in organisationalrenewal. British Journal of Management 10, 291307.
Nabseth, L., Ray, G.F., 1974. The Diffusion of New Industrial Processes: An International Study.
Cambridge University Press, UK.
Noordin Shehabuddeen*, David Probert, Robert Phaal(2006)" From theory to practice: challenges
in operationalising a technology selection framework" doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.017 , pp.
324335.
Ont, S., & Soner, S. (2007). Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches
under fuzzy environment. Waste Management, 28(9), 15521559.
Schroder, R., Sohal, A.S., 1999. Organisational characteristics associated with AMT adoption:
towards a contingency framework. International Journal of Operations and Production Management
19 (12), 12701291.
Shyur, H. J., & Shih, H. S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection.
Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 44, 749761.
Steensma, K.H., Fairbank, J.F., 1999. Internalizing external technology: a model of governance
mode choice and an empirical assessment. The Journal of High Technology Management Research
10 (1), 135.
Wang, M. J. J., & Chang, T. C., 1995, Tool steel materials selection under fuzzy environment.
Fuzzy Sets and Systems, No.72, pp.263270.
Wang, Y.M. & Elhag, T.M., 2006, Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an
application to bridge risk assessment, Expert Systems with Applications, No. 31, pp.309319.
Wang,T.C & Chang, T.H., 2007, Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under
a fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications, No. 33,pp.870880.
Xu, Z. S., & Chen, J. (2007). An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attributes group decision
making. Information Sciences, 177, 248263.
ISSN: 2277-1700 Website: http://www.srji.info.ms URL Forwarded to: http://sites.google.com/site/scientificrji
62
Yong, D. (2006). Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of
Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28, 839844.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338353.
Zimmerman, H. J. (1996). Fuzzy sets theory and its applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic
Publisher.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
* Department of Accounting, Zahedshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University (IAU), Zahedshar , Iran.
** Corresponding Author: Research Scholar, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, E mail:
[email protected], Mobile phone: +919623566206
*** Ali Ghani Abadi, Master of Industrial Management
Scientific Research Journal of India Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Year: 2013
63
CORRECTION NOTICE
It is hereby informed to all the readers of Scientific Research Journal of India that the main author of
the article entitled Effect of McConnell Taping on Pain, ROM & Grip Strength in Patients with
Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injury published in the Year: 2013, Vol:2, Issue:1 was Babloo
Sharma. So kindly read the authors as- Babloo Sharma, Dr. Shahid Mohd. Dar and Dr. R Arunmozhi
instead of Dr. Shahid Mohd. Dar, Dr. R Arunmozhi, Babloo Sharma.
Thanks for your kind cooperation.
Editor-in-Chief
64
CALL FOR PAPERS
Scientific Research Journal of India (SRJI) globally welcomes research scholars & scientists from
different fields of science like Botany, Zoology, Medical Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Environmental
Sciences, Natural Sciences, Anthropology etc to contribute their researches in this Open Access
Publication.
::Mail your article/s to::
[email protected]
::For full detail kindly visit::
http://www.srji.info.ms
http://sites.google.com/site/scientificrji