Epoxidation & Opening PDF
Epoxidation & Opening PDF
Epoxidation & Opening PDF
R1 R2 R3 R4 [O] R1 R3
R2 O R4
Mechanism: In the case of an allylic alcohol, an additional hydrogen bond is present (directing effect):
O O H O O H O Cl
Cl
Cl
Electrophilic reagent
Nucleophilic substrate
O H
R3 R4 R1 R3
R2 O R4
X = H or F
CX3
Potentially explosive!
Always be careful when exposing acetone to strong oxidant
t-BuOOH
O M-OR
+
O O M
R = H, alkyl, etc.
R O O M
N R N M
HO HOO O or ROO
O O O O
O Me O
m-CPBA favoured reactions with the most electron donating double bond.
O
H O 71% O
1.00
H m-CPBA
DCM O 73% O H
HO
VO(acac)2 TBHP, 80 C
OH
OH MCPBA
OH O
but...
OAc MCPBA
OAc O
4:1
10 : 1
% syn
HO
HO O
n n
n 0 1 2 3 4
MCPBA
84 95 61 0.2 0.2
Me MCPBA HO OH HO
1 isomer
Me
OH
O HN HO HO Me MCPBA HO HN
O Me Me MCPBA O HO
1 isomer
Me
OH
O
1 isomer
OH
O OH
anti syn Vo(acac)2
OH
OH
Entry
Substrate
Me
1 4:1
~50 R4
OH Me
2
Me OH
19 : 1
1:1
R3
Me
Me OH
4:1
1 : 1.5
Me Me OH Me Me OH
1 : 2.4
1 : 19
Rgem Rtrans(H) H R OH
A(1,2) strain
Rgem Rtrans(H) H O R OH
Me
1:5
1 : 19
H Rtrans(H) Rcis R OH
H
A(1,3) strain
Rtrans(H)
R O Rcis OH
10
Cl MeO
Me NH
OH Me Me OTBS
Ti(Oi-Pr)4, TBHP Synthesis of maysine
Cl MeO
Me NH
OH O Me
Me OTBS
Me
Me
Diastereoselection: >20:1
11
OH Me Me
OH
O Me
OH Me Me
OH
O
4.6 : 1
2:1
Me
OH Me
Me Me
OH
Me Me
OH Me Me Me
8:1
OH Me O Me
Me
Me
O Me Me
8:1
Me H
Me Me H
H O VL2OOt-Bu H Me
12
R3 R1 R2
1.0 eq
OH
Ti(OiPr)4 (0.05 eq) (+)-DET or DIPT (0.06 eq) t-BuOOH (2 eq) 4A mol sieves -20 C, CH2Cl2
R1
O R2
R3 OH OR RO O O Ti
RO2C O O CO2R O
R3 R2 O Ti CO2R O O R1
t-Bu RO
R2 R3
R1 OH R3
R2 R H
R1 OH R3
R2 H R
R1 OH
(+)-(R,R)-L-tartrate
Pr
OH
C7H15
O
96% ee
OH
C8H17
O
94% ee
OH
Ar
O
>98% ee
OH
Me
O
91% ee
OH
O R
R = C7H15
OH
R = C8H17 R = PhCH2OCH2
Ph
Me OH O
93% ee
O OH
95% ee
OH
>98% ee
O OH
Ph OH Ph
Me OH
94% ee
95% ee 90% ee
R OH
R = C3H7 R = C14H29
95% ee 96% ee
14
OH O Me
+
OH O
2
Me
OH OH Me
(+)-DIPT
OH Me Bu
>98% ee 53% conversion
OH O
slow 62
OH Me
+
O
38
Me Me
OH n-C6H13
OH
Me
n-C5H11 O OH
Ti(Oi-Pr)4, (+)-DIPT TBHP (0.6 equiv), -21 C >98% ee, 53% conversion
O Me n-C5H11 O OH
+
HO
O n-C5H11 Me H
O Me O
n-C5H11
OH
15
Synthesis of (+)-Trehazolin
Ledford, B. E.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11811-11812.
OH OH HO HO O HO HO HO OH HO HO OH N NH O OH HO
+
HO HO
NH2 OH
H OH
H2N
O OH OH
OH O
OH
HO H NH O CCl3
I(sym-collidine)2ClO4 NaHCO3, aq. CH3CN
Cl
O N CCl3
16
Synthesis of (+)-Trehazolin
HO O N
1. TIPSOTf 2,6-lutidine 2. Li2NiBr4, THF 80%
CCl3
TIPSO HO O N CH2Cl
TIPSO
Br O
O O
TIPSO
Br O N H CCl3
N H
CCl3
O Ph
1. h 2. OsO4, NMO
TIPSO AcO
OH OH
OAc CH2Cl
NH CH2Cl
17
Synthesis of (+)-Trehazolin
OH O OH O
1. BnCl 2. Bu4NNCS, BF3OEt2
OH
OH OH
OBn
1. 4N HCl
O HO O OH OBn HO HO OH OH H N NH S
OBn OBn
BnO BnO
OH
DMAP, MeOH
OH O HO HO OH HO
18
OH OH
OH H N
NH O
NUC O
OH O
a,b d
NUC HO OH
OH NUC OH
OH HO NUC
19
OR O
H O O
R O
OH
Disparlure
TBDPSO
Me O O Me OH
OLi
TBDPSO Ot-Bu
Me O O Me
CO2t-Bu
20
Me Me
Me O OH
Me Me
Me O
OH
DIBAL-H
OTs
CH2Cl2, 0 C
R
98%
Me OH
21
Me
Chem. Comm. 1990, 843.
OH
O O O OH OPMB
Cp2TiCl
OH O O OPMB
22
BnO OH
OH
BnO
3. DIBAL 4. (-)-DET, TBHP
OH O OTBDPS
1. Swern 2. Ph3P=CHCO2Me
OH
BnO
O OTBDPS
COOMe
BnO OH OH OH
OH
23
O R
O
Pd(0), CO2
R OMe O O O
O OMe
OH R
O OMe
Pd(0) HCO2H
O R
O OMe SmI2
DIBAL-H
OH R OH
OH R
O OMe
Me O R OH
LiCuMe2 R
Me OH
OH Me
24
R OH O
R'
O O
OH
R OH
CO2Et
O BnO Me OH
LiCuMe2 BnO
OH OH Me Me
Me O R OH
LiCuMe2 R
Me OH
OH Me
25
Me O
H OH
OH
endo-brevicomin
OTs
Me O
OH O O OH O
OH OPG TsO
OH
exo-brevicomin
OPG
26
O R
Nuc
1. PhS 2. Me2C(OMe)2, H+
OPG O R OPG H
With K2CO3, MeOH: epimerization
27
Chemoselective Ring-Opening
Nuc O R OPG
Nuc
OH OPG
+
R OH
R Nuc
OPG
O R
O O
Nuc O
Nuc
R OH
OH O R OH
Nuc
NEt2 OH
+
R NEt2
R OH
OH
3.7 : 1 < 1 : 10
O R OH R
O O R2HN O
NaH R
OH O HN O
28
Chemoselective Ring-Opening
R OH
OH
DIBAL-H
O R OH
Red-Al THF
OH R
90%
OH
29
Chemoselective Ring-Opening
HO X
5,6-endo-tet are disfavored
OH
HO X
HO X H
OH Ph O O BnO OH O OH
Ph
O O BnO
OH O
OH
Vinyl-directing group:
OH X X
O X
OH
Applications: Brevetoxin's synthesis Nicolaou J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10227.
H BnO BnO
Me O OH Me CO2Et
PPTS, CH2Cl2 97%
H BnO BnO
Me
OH Me H CO2Et
30
Me
C6H4Me
Me
C6H4Me O
93% ee (90%)
OH Ph N
OH N + Ph
OH N O
31
Catalyst:
H N Mn t-Bu O Cl t-Bu O N
t-Bu
t-Bu
Reaction:
R1 H
R2
+
R1
R2
+
R1
NaOCl H O H
H O R2
32
D Ph Ph N Mn B O t-Bu C
(b)
Ph
A
(favored)
N O t-Bu
Me
Ph H
Me H
90% ee
84% ee
D (favored)
H A t-Bu N Mn O t-Bu Ph N Mn O Cl O Ph N O N
B t-Bu
t-Bu C
<10% ee
Jacobsen, E. N.; Zhang, W.; Muci, A. R.; Ecker, J. R.; Deng, L.! J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7063-7064.
33
B (favored)
C (disfavored)
D (disfavored)
Proposed transition structures for the epoxidation of cis--mehtylstyrene. (A) epoxidation with catalyst 13 and (B-D) epoxidation with catalyst 14. [Structures created with the program Chem 3D based on the coordinates - 6 salt). frm the X-ray crystal structure of 13 (PF
Jacobsen, E. N.; Wei, Z.; Loebach, J. L.; Wilson, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2801-2803.
34
NaOCl + R N O t-Bu
H N Mn O Cl t-Bu O N
(4 mol%) t-Bu Ar R O X
>95% ee n
90-98% ee
t-Bu
Ph
CO2i-Pr
O
NaOCl (S,S)-catalyst
96% ee 87-94% ee
R1 R2
90-98% ee (trans epoxide)
O O R
Higher ee if:! -R is bulky! -Allylic oxygen
94% ee
O
NaOCl (R,R)-catalyst 93% ee
Ph
86% ee
R R R
88-95% ee
Ph
80-86% ee
Ar
<40% ee
Ar
35
(4 mol%) t-Bu R2 O
t-Bu R1
Cl / PhCl
Ph
Ph O
Ar
CO2i-Pr O
t-Bu
Et O
27 : 1, trans:cis 90% ee
8 : 1, trans:cis 86% ee
2 : 1, trans:cis 84% ee
Chang, S. B.; Galvin, J. M.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6937-6938.
36
C2F5 O
O C2F5
O OH
Bell, D.; Davies, M. R.; Finney, F. J. L.; Geen, G. R.; Kincey, P. M.; Mann, I. S. Tetrahedron Letters 1996, 37, 3895-3898. ! ! Buckle, D. R.; Eggleston, D. S.; Pinto, I. L.; Smith, D. G.; Tedder, J. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1992, 2, 1161-1164.
O
BRL 55834
N OH
>99% ee after NH2 recrystallisation
OH N
Ph H N O
OH
O
~85% ee
Hexanes
N O
NHt-Bu
Indinavir
Jacobsen, E. N.; wLarrow, J. F.; Jacobsen, E. N. Org. Synth., 1998, 75, 1-11.! Vacca, J. P.; Dorsey, B. D.; Schleif, W. A.; Levin, R. B.; Mcdaniel, S. L.; Darke, P. L.; Zugay, J.; Quintero, J. C.; Blahy, O. M.; Roth, E.; Sardana, V. V.; Schlabach, A. J.; Graham, P. I.; Condra, J. H.; Gotlib, L.; Holloway, M. K.; Lin, J.; Chen, I. W.; Vastag, K.; Ostovic, D.; Anderson, P. S.; Emini, E. A.; Huff, J. R. Proc. Nat.l Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 4096-4100.
37
OMe O N
O Ph
89% ee, 58% y.
O NBoc
MeO2C HN O N O N H
Duocarmycin SA
38
OH
NuH Chiral catalyst
Desymmetrization
R R
R Nu
Kinetic Resolution
R
O R
O R
OH
+
Nu
Nielsen, L. P. C.; Jacobsen, E. N. in Aziridines and Epoxides in Organic Synthesis, Yudin Ed, 2006, Chap. 7, p. 229.
39
H N Cr t-Bu O Cl O t-Bu N
t-Bu 2 mol% X N3 OH
t-Bu
OH N3
80% y., 88% ee
OH FmocN N3
85% y., 92% ee (-10 C)
OH O N3
80% y., 95% ee
OH O N3
80% y., 98% ee
OH N3
80% y., 94% ee
OH N3
80% y., 94% ee
Seminal work: Nugent, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 2768-2769.! Martinez, L. E.; Leighton, J. L.; Carsten, D. H.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5897-5898.! Hansen, K. B.; Leighton, J. L.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10924-10925.! Thiol as nucleophile: Wu, M. H.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5252-5254.
40
H O t-Bu
1-2 mol%
OH
HO HO
96% y. 98% ee
t-Bu
OH O OH
Wu, M. H.; Hansen, K. B.; Jacobsen, E. N.! Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2012-2014.
HO
86% y. 95% ee
OH O OH
OH HO 45% y. 99% ee O
OMe O HO HO OH
81% 96% ee
OH Me O
TsOH 60% (2 steps)
O O O
41
H N
O O
Meng, Z. Y.; Danishefsky, S. J.! Angew. Chem., Int. Edit. 2005, 44, 1511-1513.! Yun, H. D.; Meng, Z. Y.; Danishefsky, S. J.! Heterocycles 2005, 66, 711-725.
HO O O
Merrilactone A
CO2H CO2Me
42
H R t-Bu
1-2 mol%
O R
H2O
Chiral catalyst (0.2-2.0 mol%)
O R
OH
+
OH
t-Bu
Aliphatic Epoxides
R
CH3 (CH2)3CH3 (CH2)11CH3 (CH2)2CH=CH2 CH2Ph c-C6H11 t-C4H9
epox % yield 46 43 42 43 46 44 41
diol % yield 45 44 40 44 40 41 40
diol % ee 99 99 99 99 95 99 95
epox % yield 48 47 47 38 42 36 46 44 36 43 40 41
epox % ee >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99
diol % yield 40 42 41 42 42 36 45 41 36 37 40 33
diol % ee 95 98 95 97 95 96 43 95 78 97 97 96
Halogenated Epoxides
epox % yield 43 41 42 42
diol % yield 40 90 38 42
diol % ee 95 96 97 >99
CH2OBn CH2OTBS CH2OPh CH2O(1-naphtyl) CH2CH2OBn oxiranyl CH2OCOn-Pr CH2CO2Et CH2NHBoc CO2CH3 COCH3 COCH2CH3
43
H R t-Bu
1-2 mol%
O R
H2O
Chiral catalyst (0.2-2.0 mol%)
O R
OH
+
OH
t-Bu
Jacobsen, E. N.; Tokunaga, M.; Larrow, J. F.; Kakiuchi, F. Science 1997, 277, 936-938.! ! Jacobsen, E. N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 421-431.! ! Schaus, S. E.; Brandes, B. D.; Larrow, J. F.; Tokunaga, M.; Hansen, K. B.; Gould, A. E.; Furrow, M. E.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1307-1315.
R
Ph 4-ClC6H4 3-ClC6H4 3-MeOC6H4 3-NO2C6H4 2-ClC6H4 CH=CH2 CCTBS
epox % yield 44 38 40 41 38 38 36 41
diol % yield 42 37 44 41 44 42 38 41
diol % ee 98 94 91 95 99 94 97 99
44
HSO5[Oxone] 1 equiv
R R
R1 R2
O O
HSO4O
180
R R
O O
R R
O
180
O
180
O L(S) S(L)
O S(L)
L(S)
45
O O O O O R1 O
Spiro (A) Favored
O O
O O R2
O R3 SO42Epoxidation Cycle O O
OHO OO O SO3
O O
Competing pathway
46
O O
O O O ----
CH2OAc O O
O O O
CMe2OH O O
C6H13
51% (42%ee)
O Ph
-----
Ph
--
95% (92%ee)
---
--
93% (21%ee)
O O O R1 R2 SiMe3
O O R1 TBAF R2 R1 O
Oxone H2O-Solvent
R2
SiMe3 O
84-94% ee
48
R1
Entry 1 2 3
Yield (%) 77 41 68
ee (%) 97 96 96
Ph
CO2Et OTBS
O O
OMe CO2Et O
OMe CO2Et O Ph
100
65
89
88 SiMe3
82
95
Ph
SiMe3 SiMe3 Ph
O Ph O Ph
SiMe3 SiMe3
92
14:1
77
94
100
81
95
49
Entry
Enynes
Yield (%)
ee (%)
Entry
Enynes SiMe3
Yield (%) 71
ee (%) 89
R 1 2 3 4 5 Ph SiMe3 6 Ph 64 94 78 88 86 71 59 93 90 94 93
SiMe3 8 84 95
R 96
9 10
R=H R = SiMe3
60 83
93 97
50
R3
Nu R1
O R2
R3 R4Cu SN2' R1
R2
R3 R4
OH Ag+ R2
Mo(CO)6 R3=H
O R1 Nu R2
R1
R4 R3
51
O O
O O
Entry
Olens
Yield (%) OH OH OH 85 43 68
ee (%) 94 92 91
Entry
Olens
Yield (%) OH 85 75 82 90
ee (%) 92 74 90 91
1 2 3
Ph Ph
6 7 8 9 Ph
OH OH OH
Ph 4 Ph 5 OH OH 93 94 87 94
Ph
10 11 OH
OH Ph
83 87
91 91
52
Entry Substrate
OTBS 1 Ph
3 4
R = Ac R = Bz
59 82
74 93
OAc 9 Ph Ph
OAc O
66
91
53
OBz O R
1 R2
O R1
p-TsOH AlMe3
94 94
94 (R) 90 (R)
72 71
(R)
99 99 99 99
79 45 87 81
54
O OCOR R2
AL
55
Not efcient for styrene oxides and acyclic epoxides O OBz O 97%ee
56
Synthesis of Polyepoxides
Vilotijevic, I.; Jamison, T.F. Science 2007, 317, 1189-1192
57
Synthesis of Polyepoxides
Vilotijevic, I.; Jamison, T.F. Science 2007, 317, 1189-1192
58
Synthesis of Polyepoxides
Synthesis of Polyepoxides
Vilotijevic, I.; Jamison, T.F. Science 2007, 317, 1189-1192
60
OsO4
O Os O
2 K2CO3 2 H2O
3 K3Fe(CN)6 2 K2CO3
2 K4Fe(CN)6 2 KHCO3
61
O Os O O L
O O Os O O Ligand R
O O O Os L O
Ste Mepwis ch e [2 an +2 ism ]
O O
O Os L
62
OsO4 OH OH NMO
HO
Exceptions:
O S OH Me Me Me Ph NMe OsO4 NMO Me Me O S OH Me OH OH OH Me OH Me OH OH cat. OsO4, NMO : OsO4, TMEDA: 91%, 88%, dr = 1 : 4 dr = >25 : 1
63
Ph NMe OH + Me OH OH
O Me
OsO4
OH Me OH
3.7 : 1
OBn BnO Me
OsO4 BnO
OBn OH Me OH
7:1
Me
OsO4
OH Me OH
7.6 : 1
OBn BnO
Me
OsO4 BnO
OBn OH Me OH
9:1
Me Me OH CO2Et
OsO4 NMO Me
Me OH CO2Et OH OH
HO Me Et
OH
O O only isomer
Me Me OH CO2Et
OsO4 NMO Me
Me OH CO2Et OH OH
HO Me Et O
OH O
only isomer
64
H C6H4OMe C O O HO HO Me Me
61 : 1
OH
OH OBn
OBn Me Me
35 : 1
OBn Me Me
17 : 1
OBn Me Me
5.1 : 1
Me
65
H H R2 R1
Vedejs Model Based on the steric hindrance of the osmium reagent
OX C R1 C H R2 R2
R1 C XO
Kishi Model Based on ground-state conformational effects and an implied stereoelectronic pfacial bias imposed by the allylic oxygen.
C OX
H R2
R2
H C
H R2
References: Houk, K. N. Science 1986, 231, 1108. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2754. Vedejs, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1094. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6861.
Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 3943. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 2247.
66
R O O Os O R R HO
ORGANIC LAYER AQUEOUS LAYER 22-
OsO4 R OH
O L
2 K2CO3 4 H2O
O HO HO Os O OH OH
O O O Os O OH OH
2 K2CO3 2 H2O
3 K3Fe(CN)6 2 K2CO3
2 K4Fe(CN)6 2 KHCO3
67
Monodentate Ligands: + L*
Bidentate Ligands: L
OsO4
16 e-
OsO4 L 18 e-
O O Os O OL 16 e-
OsO4
16 e-
OsO4 L 18 eL
L L
O Os O
O O
18 e-
OK
hydrolysis / reoxidation
X
hydrolysis / reoxidation
68
Cl
Et N O O N
DHQD-CLB
Et N O O N DHQD-IND H OMe
Et N H MeO N O N Ph Ph
Et N O N N H OMe MeO H
Et N O
Et N N O N H OMe
(DHQD)2-PYR
Reviews:
Sharpless, K. B. et al. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2483-2547. Sharpless, K. B. In Catalytic asymmetric synthesis, Ojima Ed. p. 227.
69
Et N H O O N DHQ-IND N
Et N H MeO N O
70
Bu
Bu
n-C5H11
COOEt
RM H
RL
Bu
n-C5H11 OMe
71
n-C5H11
COOEt
Ph
COOEt
Ph
Ph Ph
Me Ph (DHQD)2-PHAL 97% ee
(DHQD)2-PHAL 99% ee
(DHQD)2-PHAL 97% ee
(DHQD)2-PHAL >99.5% ee
(DHQD)2-PHAL 94% ee
Me n-C5H11 (DHQD)2-PHAL 78% ee n-C8H17 (DHQD)2-PHAL 84% ee (DHQD)2-PYR 89% ee COOBn (DHQD)2-PHAL 77% ee Ph Me
Bu
n-C5H11
DHQD-IND 72% ee
DHQD-IND 80% ee
72
(DHQD)2-PHAL
Structure of the Bis OsO4 complex of (DHQD)2PHAL based on molecular mechanics calculations and NOE experiments.
74
Its presence has a small effect on the rates; however, it increases the binding The nature of R has a very large effect on the rates, but only a small influence on the binding Oxygenation is essential to allow binding to OsO4 - a carbon substituent is too bulky
Dihydroquinine Derivatives
N R O
9
The configuration is important: only erythro allows high rates and binding
"HO
OH" -face
NW OMe
Increases binding to OsO4 as well as rates
NE
N
The presence of a flat, aromatic ring system increases binding and rates; the nitrogen has no influence Relationship between ligand structure and Keq and ceiling rate constants. The alkaloid core is ideally set up to ensure high rates, binding, and solubility. The rates are influenced considerably by the nature of the O9 substituent, while the binding to OsO4 is almost independent of that substituent.
attractive area
SE
Dihydroquinine Derivatives
Mechanistic Discussion:
Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11038-11053.
Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 319-329.
Corey, E. J.; Guzmanperez, A.; Noe, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10805-10816.
Delmonte, A. J.; Haller, J.; Houk, K. N.; Sharpless, K. B.; Singleton, D. A.; Strassner, T.; Thomas, A. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9907-9908.
75
Reading: Kolb, H. C.; Vannieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2483-2547.
OH R1 OH
Primary vs secondary: unsually not a problem
R2
O O
OH OH
O O O
OH R1
O OR2
O R1 COOR2
OH
48-91%
76
OH R1 OH R2 1. SOCl2 R1
R2 O O SO2
CO2Me Me Me OH
Me
S O2
N3
OH
R2 R1 OAc
NaOEt EtOH
R1
O 5-endo tet O S O O
NaH, DME
MeO2C CO2Me
77
OH R1 OH R2
R1 O
R2
Taxol side-chain: (JOC 94, 5014) OH Ph OH O 1. MeC(OMe)3, PPTS (cat.) 2. CH3COBr or TMSX OMe 3.NaN 3 4. H2, Pd Ph OH NHAc O OMe
78
Ph
Ph
Ph
Higher yields and enantioselectivities with sterically less demanding nitrogen nucleophiles Products are solid, ee can be increased by recrystallisation Drawback: Removing the sulfonyl group.
79
R HO
R NHX
O
CbzNClNa (3 equiv) BOCNClNa (3 equiv.)
TMS
NHCBz Ph CO2Me OH
(DHQ)2-PHAL 65% y. 94% ee
NHCBz Me CO2t-Bu OH
(DHQ)2-PHAL 52% y. 74% ee
TeoCNClNa (3 equiv.)
NClNa
NHBOC MeO OH
(DHQ)2-PHAL 60% y. 97% ee 3:1 regioselectivity
NHTeoC Ph CO2i-Pr OH
(DHQ)2-PHAL 70% y. 99% ee
MeO
BzCHN
OH
(DHQ)2-PHAL 65% y. 99% ee 3:1 regioselectivity
MeO
80
R R
R HO
R NHAc
O AcNBrLi Cl NHBr
NHAc Ph CO2i-Pr OH
(DHQ)2-PHAL 81% y. 99% ee
NHAc Ph Ph OH
(DHQ)2-PHAL 50% y. 94% ee
NHC(O)CH2Cl Ph CO2i-Pr OH
(DHQ)2-PHAL 75% y. 95% ee
NHC(O)CH2Cl Ph OH
(DHQ)2-PHAL 77% y. 97% ee 1.3:1 regioselectivity
AcHN
CO2Me OH Ph
NHC(O)CH2Cl OH
(DHQD)2-PHAL 46 y. 90 ee
81
OH OH O Me O OH OH Me EtOOC
OH OH OH
OH OH OH HO OH OH OH HO EtOOC
OH OH OH
OH OH OH HO OH OH
82
O O 1. AD-mix- (2 equiv) 2. (CH3O)2CMe2, H+ O O 1. AD-mix- 2. TBDMSCl (1 equiv) 3. MEMCl (1 equiv) 4. TBAF 5. DMS/NCS 6. Horner-Emmons 1. AcOH, H2O (cleave 1 acetonide) 2. (EtO)3CMe, TMSBr (bromoester) 3. AIBN, Bu3SnH (reduction C-Br) 4. LiOH (saponication) 5. Yamaguchi 6. HSCH2CH2SH, BF3 O O O O EtO2C OMEM
OH OH O Me O OH
83
Me
(Ph3P)3RhCl
84