Common Carriers Civil Code
Common Carriers Civil Code
Common Carriers Civil Code
COMMON CARRIERS
ARTICLE 1733. Common carriers, from the nature of their business and for
reasons of public policy, are bound to observe extraordinary diligence in
the vigilance over the goods and for the safety of the passengers
transported by them, according to all the circumstances of each case.
Paitdo
Such extraordinary diligence in the vigilance over the goods is further
expressed in articles 1734, 1735, and 1745, Nos. 5, 6, and 7, while the
extraordinary diligence for the safety of the passengers is further set forth
in articles 1755 and 1756.
ARTICLE 1734. Common carriers are responsible for the loss, destruction,
or deterioration of the goods, unless the same is due to any of the following
causes only:
ARTICLE 1739. In order that the common carrier may be exempted from
responsibility, the natural disaster must have been the proximate and only
cause of the loss. However, the common carrier must exercise due
diligence to prevent or minimize loss before, during and after the
occurrence of flood, storm or other natural disaster in order that the
common carrier may be exempted from liability for the loss, destruction, or
deterioration of the goods. The same duty is incumbent upon the common
carrier in case of an act of the public enemy referred to in article 1734, No.
2.
ARTICLE 1743. If through the order of public authority the goods are
seized or destroyed, the common carrier is not responsible, provided said
public authority had power to issue the order.
ARTICLE 1744. A stipulation between the common carrier and the shipper
or owner limiting the liability of the former for the loss, destruction, or
deterioration of the goods to a degree less than extraordinary diligence
shall be valid, provided it be: mimows
(1) That the goods are transported at the risk of the owner or shipper;
(2) That the common carrier will not be liable for any loss, destruction, or
deterioration of the goods;
(3) That the common carrier need not observe any diligence in the custody
of the goods;
(4) That the common carrier shall exercise a degree of diligence less than
that of a good father of a family, or of a man of ordinary prudence in the
vigilance over the movables transported;
(5) That the common carrier shall not be responsible for the acts or
omission of his or its employees;
(6) That the common carriers liability for acts committed by thieves, or of
robbers who do not act with grave or irresistible threat, violence or force, is
dispensed with or diminished;
(7) That the common carrier is not responsible for the loss, destruction, or
deterioration of goods on account of the defective condition of the car,
vehicle, ship, airplane or other equipment used in the contract of carriage.
ARTICLE 1747. If the common carrier, without just cause, delays the
transportation of the goods or changes the stipulated or usual route, the
contract limiting the common carriers liability cannot be availed of in case
of the loss, destruction, or deterioration of the goods.
ARTICLE 1750. A contract fixing the sum that may be recovered by the
owner or shipper for the loss, destruction, or deterioration of the goods is
valid, if it is reasonable and just under the circumstances, and has been
fairly and freely agreed upon.
ARTICLE 1751. The fact that the common carrier has no competitor along
the line or route, or a part thereof, to which the contract refers shall be
taken into consideration on the question of whether or not a stipulation
limiting the common carriers liability is reasonable, just and in consonance
with public policy.
ARTICLE 1752. Even when there is an agreement limiting the liability of the
common carrier in the vigilance over the goods, the common carrier is
disputably presumed to have been negligent in case of their loss,
destruction or deterioration.
ARTICLE 1753. The law of the country to which the goods are to be
transported shall govern the liability of the common carrier for their loss,
destruction or deterioration.
ARTICLE 1754. The provisions of articles 1733 to 1753 shall apply to the
passengers baggage which is not in his personal custody or in that of his
employee. As to other baggage, the rules in articles 1998 and 2000 to 2003
concerning the responsibility of hotel-keepers shall be applicable.
Safety of Passengers
ARTICLE 1759. Common carriers are liable for the death of or injuries to
passengers through the negligence or wilful acts of the formers
employees, although such employees may have acted beyond the scope of
their authority or in violation of the orders of the common carriers. orIsit
This liability of the common carriers does not cease upon proof that they
exercised all the diligence of a good father of a family in the selection and
supervision of their employees.
ARTICLE 1760. The common carriers responsibility prescribed in the
preceding article cannot be eliminated or limited by stipulation, by the
posting of notices, by statements on the tickets or otherwise.
ARTICLE 1761. The passenger must observe the diligence of a good father
of a family to avoid injury to himself.
ARTICLE 1762. The contributory negligence of the passenger does not bar
recovery of damages for his death or injuries, if the proximate cause
thereof is the negligence of the common carrier, but the amount of
damages shall be equitably reduced.
Common Provisions
ARTICLE 1765. The Public Service Commission may, on its own motion or
on petition of any interested party, after due hearing, cancel the certificate
of public convenience granted to any common carrier that repeatedly fails
to comply with his or its duty to observe extraordinary diligence as
prescribed in this Section.
ARTICLE 1766. In all matters not regulated by this Code, the rights and
obligations of common carriers shall be governed by the Code of
Commerce and by special laws.