Counselling: The Relationship Between Counselling and Psychotherapy
Counselling: The Relationship Between Counselling and Psychotherapy
Counselling is a wonderful twentieth-century invention. We live in a complex, busy, changing world. In this world, there are many different types of experience that are difficult for people to cope with. Most of the time, we get on with life, but sometimes we are stopped in our tracks by an event or situation that we do not, at that moment, have the resources to sort out. Most of the time, we find ways of dealing with such problems in living by talking to family, friends, neighbours, priests or our family doctor. Counselling is not just something that happens between two people. It is also a social institution that is embedded in the culture of modern industrialized societies. The term counselling includes work with individuals and with relationships which may be developmental, crisis support, psychotherapeutic, guiding or problem solving . . . The task of counselling is to give the client an opportunity to explore, discover and clarify ways of living more satisfyingly and resourcefully. Counselling denotes a professional relationship between a trained counselor and a client. This relationship is usually person-to-person, although it may sometimes involve more than two people. It is designed to help clients to understand and clarify their views of their lifespace, and to learn to reach their self-determined goals through meaningful, wellinformed choices and through resolution of problems of an emotional or interpersonal nature. A principled relationship characterised by the application of one or more psychological theories and a recognised set of communication skills, modified by experience, intuition and other interpersonal factors, to clients intimate concerns, problems or aspirations. It may be of very brief or long duration, take place in an organisational or private practice setting and may or may not overlap with practical, medical and other matters of personal welfare. It is both a distinctive activity undertaken by people agreeing to occupy the roles of counsellor and client . . . and an emerging profession . . . It is a service sought by people in distress or in some degree of confusion who wish to discuss and resolve these in a relationship which is more disciplined and confidential than friendship, and perhaps less stigmatising than helping relationships offered in traditional medical or psychiatric settings.
To summarize, it can be seen that it is no easy matter to define counselling. In some respects this can be frustrating for people seeking counselling, because it means that there are many situations in which it can be hard for them to know exactly what is on offer when they consult someone who labels himself or herself as a counsellor. On the other hand, the fact that counselling has been, and continues to be, influenced and shaped by so many different traditions and helping approaches gives it a great deal of its vitality and energy. The whole question of what is counselling? is discussed very fully by Feltham (1995).
Self-acceptance. The development of a positive attitude towards self, marked by an ability to acknowledge areas of experience that had been the subject of self-criticism and rejection. Self-actualization or individuation. Moving in the direction of fulfilling potential or achieving an integration of previously conflicting parts of self. Enlightenment. Assisting the client to arrive at a higher state of spiritual awakening. Problem-solving. Finding a solution to a specific problem that the client had not been able to resolve alone. Acquiring a general competence in problem-solving. Psychological education. Enabling the client to acquire ideas and techniques with which to understand and control behaviour. Acquisition of social skills. Learning and mastering social and interpersonal skills such as maintenance of eye contact, turn-taking in conversations, assertiveness or anger control. Cognitive change. The modification or replacement of irrational beliefs or maladaptive thought patterns associated with self-destructive behaviour. Behaviour change. The modification or replacement of maladaptive or selfdestructive patterns of behaviour. Systemic change. Introducing change into the way in that social systems (e.g. families) operate. Empowerment. Working on skills, awareness and knowledge that will enable the client to take control of his or her own life. Restitution. Helping the client to make amends for previous destructive behaviour. Generativity and social action. Inspiring in the person a desire and capacity to care for others and pass on knowledge (generativity) and to contribute to the collective good through political engagement and community work. It is unlikely that any one counsellor or counselling agency would attempt to achieve the objectives underlying all the aims in this list. On the whole, psychodynamic counsellors have focused primarily on insight, humanistic practitioners have aimed to promote self-acceptance and personal freedom, and cognitive behavioural therapists have been mainly concerned with the management and control of behaviour. However, any valid counselling approach should be flexible enough to make it possible for the client to use the therapeutic relationship as an arena for exploring whatever dimension of life is most relevant to their well-being at that point in time.
Counselling is in many respects an unusual area of practice in that it encompasses a set of strongly competing theoretical perspectives, a wide range of practical applications and meaningful inputs from a number of contributing disciplines. Thorne and Dryden (1993) have edited a collection of biographical essays written by counsellors on the ways in which they have used early training in disciplines such as ecology, theology and social anthropology to inform their counseling practice. The field of counselling and psychotherapy represents a synthesis of ideas from science, philosophy, religion and the arts. It is an interdisciplinary area that cannot appropriately be incorporated or subsumed into any one of its constituent disciplines. An approach to counselling that was, for example, purely scientific or purely religious in nature would soon be seen not to be counselling at all, in its denial of key areas of client and practitioner experience.
There exist many definitions of counselling, each of which emphasizes different aspects of the counselling role and process. Counselling is similar to, and also different from, other forms of helping, such as psychotherapy, social work and psychiatric nursing. There are many competing theories of counselling, and a variety of settings for counselling practice. The diversity of counselling is also reflected in its roots in disciplines such as philosophy, religion and the arts, as well as psychology and psychiatry. The diversity and heterogeneity of counselling can be seen as a strength, reflecting the sensitivity of counselling to the enormous variations in human experience. The common elements within the great diversity of counselling provision can best be understood by defining counselling from a socially oriented, user focused perspective.
Psychoanalysis remained a marginal activity until it was enthusiastically espoused by many sectors of American society in the 1920s and 1930s. The client-centred theory of Carl Rogers represented a more popular, accessible approach, that did much to bring counselling to the masses. The rapid expansion and popularity of counselling in the USA can be attributed to high levels of social mobility and consumerism, which produced a lack of meaning, or empty self, that therapy helped to fill. Other important strands in the evolution of counselling include vocational guidance in educational settings, and the voluntary sector.
It is important to recognize that counselling plays a role in society of promoting an image of the person as an intrinsically autonomous and separate being, and in supporting strategies for dealing with social problems at an individual level. Counselling is an activity that is inextricably bound up with the culture of Western industrial societies, and is therefore not necessarily relevant to the problems experienced by members of other cultural groups.
Counselling Theories
During the twentieth century, the development of counselling and psychotherapy came to be organized around a number of distinct theoretical models orapproaches. Historically, the most important of these approaches or schools of therapy have been psychodynamic, cognitivebehavioural and humanistic. However, these are merely the most popular of a wide range of theoretical orientations presently in use. The current situation in counselling and psychotherapy is one of great theoretical diversity and creativity. Just as quickly as new theories are spawned, new attempts are enjoined to unify, combine or integrate them. The proliferation of theories and approaches is often confusing for people learning about counselling, whether clients or students. The aim of this chapter is to make sense of theoretical diversity, and the role of theory in counselling. The topic is tackled by first establishing just what is meant by theory, then looking at the uses of theorizing in counselling (Why do we need theory? How is theory used in practice?). The discussion moves on to consider the factors that have contributed to the apparent diversity among counselling theories, and then shifts to an analysis of the underlying similarities between all counseling approaches. Theories of counselling and psychotherapy do not represent immutable truths, but are perhaps better regarded as providing tools for understanding. It is essential for each counsellor to develop his or her own personal approach,
consistent with his or her own life experience, cultural values and work setting. There are some key ideas that run through this chapter, and inform the book as a whole, in relation to the role of theory and the difference between competing schools or approaches within the field of counselling and psychotherapy: from the point of view of the client, the experience of counselling is much the same, no matter which theoretical orientation is being used by the counsellor; there is little evidence that any one theory of counselling is more valid, effective or true than any other; being able to offer a secure, confidential relationship, hopefulness and some kind of structure for exploring and resolving problems in living, and becoming more connected with other people, is more important than theory; it is essential for effective counselling that the practitioner has a coherent framework for understanding what he or she is trying to achieve; in multicultural, pluralist democratic societies, it is inevitable that competing value systems and cultural traditions will generate different ideas about human personality and the proper aims of counselling some degree of theoretical diversity and debate is healthy and necessary; the current fragmentation and proliferation of counselling and psychotherapy theories is a result of (a) the current state of development of the profession, and (b) social and economic factors; the prevailing movement within counselling is in the direction of increased theoretical convergence and consensus. It is essential, also, to appreciate that theories of counselling and psychotherapy reflect the ideas and concerns that are most pressing for individuals at any particular point in history. Theories of counselling and psychotherapy are continually undergoing reconstruction to reflect prevailing social issues and developments Theory as a structured set of ideas The obvious way of looking at a theory is to think about it as a set of ideas or concepts that are used to make sense of some dimension of reality: for example, Einsteins theory of relativity is a set of ideas that explain the relationship between time and space. A theory is different from everyday, common-sense ideas in that it is stated formally, with clearly defined terms, has been tested or critically evaluated in some way and is consistent with other scientific ideas. In relation to theories of counselling, it is essential to acknowledge that the set of ideas that makes up a theory is not only all of these things (useful, clearly defined, critically tested etc.), but is also structured. In other words, a counseling theory operates at different levels of abstraction, and the implications for a counsellor of using any particular theory depend a great deal on which level of abstraction he or she is employing. Three levels to any theoretical model used in counselling and therapy. First, there are statements about observational data. Second, there are theoretical propositions, which make connections between different observations. Third, there are statements of philosophical assumptions, or metapsychology. Rapaport and Gill (1959) looked at the theoretical structure of psychoanalysis, and came to the conclusion that statements about, for example, defence mechanisms such as projection or denial were fundamentally simple observations of behavioural events. Psychoanalytic concepts such as anal personality, on the other hand, went beyond mere observation, and made inferences about the connectedness of events separated by time and space. For example, the idea of anal personality implies a link between childhood events (potty training) and adult behaviour (obsessionality), and this association is inferred rather than directly observed. It can be seen, therefore, that learning and using a theory of counseling involves different kinds of tasks and challenges. On the one hand, to become familiar with a theory it is necessary to learn how to detect or label observational phenomena such as defences, transference, empathy, irrational beliefs and so on. On the other hand, it is also necessary to become immersed enough in the underlying image of the person or philosophy of a theory to appreciate what is meant by the unconscious, self-actualization or reinforcement. Finally, there is the task of understanding how observational and philosophical concepts are brought together in the form of specific theoretical propositions. All this is made even more difficult because few theories of counselling and psychotherapy are ever formulated in a manner that allows their structure to be clearly identified. For example, writers such as Rogers or Freud conveyed their ideas through case studies, through essays on specific topics and (in Rogers case) in research papers. The structures of therapy theories are often more clearly explained not in therapy and counselling books, but in personality textbooks such as those by Monte (1998) and Pervin and Johns (2000). There are several implications of a social perspective that are significant for understanding how theory is created and used in counselling. First, the oral tradition is always broader than what is written about it. Writers such as Freud and
Rogers were influential because they were able to put into words, better than anyone else at the time, the ways of understanding and working with clients that were being generated in their oral communities. But, even in their cases, there was always more that could be said. Both Freud and Rogers struggled, throughout their careers, to find the best ways to articulate in words what they knew at an implicit level. Some of the apparent theoretical debates and differences in counseling and psychotherapy can therefore be viewed not so much as arguments over the substance of what is happening in therapy, but as disputes around the best language to use in talking about these happenings. Another key implication is that, much of the time, it is more accurate to talk about counselling approaches rather than theories. The idea of an approach is a reminder that there is more to way of doing counselling than merely applying a set of ideas: an approach embraces philosophical assumptions, style, tradition and tacit knowing. The third, and in some way most important, implication of a social perspective is to suggest that in many ways a theory is like a language: psychodynamic theory is the language used by one group of practitioners, cognitivebehavioural theory is a language used by another group and so on. The idea of theory as language is a fertile metaphor. It does not imply that one theory is right and another one is wrong. However, it does admit the possibility that it is easier to talk about some things in certain languages rather than others. Learning a language involves knowing about formal rules, acquiring everyday idioms and practising with other speakers. And it also introduces the issue of translating between different languages, in order to communicate with colleagues in other communities: to be able to translate, practitioners need to know about different theories, rather than remaining monolingual. There is also the question as to whether it might ever be possible, or desirable, to develop a common language for all therapies (a kind of counsellors Esperanto?), as suggested by Ryle (1978, 1987). Finally, by regarding a theory as a language-system, it becomes easier to appreciate how processes of power and oppression can occur in counselling. If, for example, a theory does not contain language for talking about homosexuality in positive terms, then gay and lesbian counsellors and clients are silenced and excluded. If a theory does not include words to describe spiritual experience, then it becomes much harder to talk about that dimension of life in counselling or supervision. In fact, both homosexuality and religion/spirituality were largely suppressed in the language of mid-twentieth-century therapy, and it has been a long and hard struggle to allow these voices to be heard.