EPA-542-R-94-005 Number 6 September 1994

INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES: ANNUAL STATUS REPORT (Sixth Edition)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Technology Innovation Office Washington, DC 20460

NOTICE This material has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under contract number 68-C0-0047. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. To obtain a copy of this report, fill out the request form on the next page and mail or fax it to: U.S. EPA/NCEPI P.O. Box 42419 Cincinnati, OH 45242 Fax Number: 513-891-6685

ii

September 1994 INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES: ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Request to be on Mailing List This report is distributed once a year to Superfund management in U.S. EPA Headquarters and regional offices, pertinent EPA laboratories, states, EPA libraries, and representatives of other federal agencies. All project contacts listed in the report also receive a copy. If you would like your name added to or deleted from the mailing list for future reports or would like a copy of the 6th edition, please complete the following form and send or fax it to: U.S. EPA/NCEPI P.O. Box 42419 Cincinnati, OH 45242-0419 Fax number: 513-891-6685 Please send me a copy of the 6th Edition, EPA-542-R-94-005. Please add my name and address to the mailing list: Name Company Street or P.O. Box City State Zip I already have a copy of the 6th Edition, EPA-542-R-94-005. Please remove my name and address from the mailing list.

My name is already on the mailing list. Please change the name and address. FROM: TO:

iii

FOREWORD In April 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) established the Technology Innovative Office (TIO) to promote the use of innovative treatment technologies for contaminated site cleanup. TIOs mission is to encourage government and industry to increase the use of innovative treatment technology to mitigate contaminated waste sites, soils and ground water. One of TIOs goals is the removal of regulatory and institutional barriers to the development and use of innovative technologies. Another is the provision of richer technology and market information to target audiences, including federal agencies, states, consulting engineering firms, responsible parties, technology developers, technology vendors and the investment community. This report documents the status of innovative treatment technology use in the Superfund program. To a lesser extent, the report presents information on innovative treatment projects at non-Superfund sites under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy. We have expanded the report to include many new innovative projects selected by EPA in fiscal year 1993 and numerous graphics and tables to assist the reader in understanding the data. We hope that this information will allow better communication between experienced technology users and those who are considering innovative technologies to clean up contaminated sites, as well as enabling technology vendors to evaluate the market for innovative treatment technologies in Superfund for the next several years. The use of innovative treatment technologies in Superfund and other EPA waste programs is addressed by a directive, Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment Technologies in OSWER Programs (OSWER Directive 9380.0-17, June 10, 1991). This directive sets forth seven initiatives to remove impediments from and create incentives for the use of innovative treatment technologies for Superfund, corrective action under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and underground storage tank cleanups. It is hoped that efforts such as the directive and this document will increase the reliance on new, less costly, or more effective technologies to address the problems associated with Superfund and other hazardous waste sites, and petroleum contamination. Walter W. Kovalick, Jr. Ph.D. Director, Technology Innovation Office

iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared under the direction of Ms. Linda Fiedler, work assignment manager for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys Technology Innovation Office. Special acknowledgement is due the Regional and state staff listed as contacts for individual sites. They provided the detailed information in this document. Their cooperation and willingness to share their knowledge and expertise on innovative treatment technologies encourages the application of those technologies at other sites.

ABSTRACT This yearly report (formerly published twice a year) documents and analyzes the selection and use of innovative treatment technologies in the U.S. EPA Superfund Program and at some non-Superfund sites under the jurisdiction of the Departments of Defense (DoD) and Energy (DOE). The status of most projects have been updated, and projects selected in fiscal year 1993 Superfund Records of Decision (ROD) are included. The information will allow better communication between experienced technology users and those who are considering innovative technologies to clean up contaminated sites. In addition, the information will enable technology vendors to evaluate the market for innovative technologies in Superfund for the next several years. It also will be used by EPAs Technology Innovation Office to track progress in the application of innovative treatment technologies. Alternative treatment technologies are alternatives to land disposal. Innovative treatment technologies are alternative treatment technologies the use of which at Superfund and similar sites is inhibited by lack of data on cost and performance. This report documents the use of the following innovative treatment technologies to treat ground water (in situ), soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix wastes: Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Bioremediation (In Situ) Chemical treatment Dechlorination In situ flushing In situ vitrification Soil vapor extraction Soil washing Solvent extraction Thermal desorption Other technologies (air sparging, contained recovery of oil wastes, limestone barriers and fuming gasification)

The document includes information on 290 applications of innovative treatment technologies for remedial actions, 31 applications for removal actions, and 28 applications under other federal programs. Sections 1, 2, and 3 contain summary information for Superfund remedial, removal and other Federal program sites, at which innovative treatment has been selected or used. Appendices A, B, and C contain site-specific information for Superfund remedial, removal and other federal program sites respectively. The information for these sections was collected through analyses of RODs, review of OSWER tracking systems, and interviews with EPA regional, DoD, and DOE staff. Appendix E also contains performance and operating data on the 25 remedial, 20 removal, and 7 non-Superfund innovative projects that have been completed.

vi

CONTENTS Notice Document Request Form Foreword Acknowledgements Abstract List of Figures List of Tables List of Abbreviations OVERVIEW Introduction What are Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies? Sources of Information for this Report Definitions for Specific Innovative Treatment Technologies SECTION 1: INNOVATIVE SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS Frequency of Technology Selection Status of Innovative Technology Implementation Contaminants of Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies Quantity of Soil Addressed Treatment Trains SECTION 2: INNOVATIVE SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS Frequency of Technology Selection Status of Innovative Technology Implementation Contaminants Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies Treatment Trains SECTION 3: INNOVATIVE ACTIONS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix
vii

Page ii iii iv v vi viii ix x OV-1 OV-1 OV-1 OV-2 1 1 6 6 6 7 8 8 9 10 10 11 13

Apendices Appendix A: Table A-1: Table A-2: Appendix B: Table B-1: Appendix C: Table C-1: Appendix D: Appendix E: Table E-1: Table E-2: Table E-3: Table E-4: Table E-5:

Page Innovative Technologies at Superfund Remedial Actions Superfund Remedial Actions: Site-Specific Information by Innovative Treatment Technology Superfund Remedial Actions: Established Treatment Technologies by Fiscal Year Innovative Technologies at Superfund Removal Actions Superfund Removal Actions: Site-Specific Information by Innovative Treatment Technology Innovative Technologies at Actions Under Other Federal Programs Other Federal Programs: Site-Specific Information by Innovative Treatment Technology Summary of Status Report Updates, Changes, and Deletions Completed Innovative Projects and Treatment Trains Superfund Remedial Actions: Performance Data on Completed Projects Superfund Removal Actions: Performance Data on Completed Projects Other Federal Programs: Performance Data on Completed Projects Superfund Remedial Actions: Treatment Trains with Innovative Treatment Technologies Superfund Removal Actions: Treatment Trains with Innovative Treatment Technologies LIST OF FIGURES A-1 A-68 B-1 C-1 D-1 E-1 E-1 E-11 E-19 E-22 E-25

Number 1 Superfund Remedial Actions: 2 Superfund Remedial Actions: 3 Superfund Remedial Actions: 4 Superfund Remedial Actions: 5 Superfund Remedial Actions: Through Fiscal Year 1993 6 Superfund Remedial Actions: 7 Superfund Remedial Actions: Corresponding RODs 8 Superfund Remedial Actions: 9 Superfund Remedial Actions: 10 Superfund Remedial Actions: 11 Superfund Remedial Actions: 12 Superfund Remedial Actions:

RODs Signed by Fiscal Year Source Control RODs by Fiscal Year Overview of Source Control RODs Through Fiscal Year 1993 Treatment and Disposal Decisions for Source Control Summary of Alternative Treatment Technologies Selected Number of Established Versus Innovative Treatment Technologies Number of Innovative Treatment Technologies Versus Innovative Treatment Technologies by Year Trends in the Selection of Four Innovative Treatment Technologies Project Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies as of June 1994 Application of Innovative Treatment Technologies Quantities of Soil to be Treated by Innovative Technologies

Page 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 12

viii

LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) 13 14 15 16 17 E-1 Superfund Removal Actions: Summary of Innovative Technologies Selected/Used as of June 1994 8 Superfund Removal Actions: Project Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies as of June 1994 9 Superfund Removal Actions: Application of Innovative Treatment Technologies 10 Sample of Projects Under Other Federal Programs: Summary of Treatment Technologies as of June 1994 11 Sample of Projects Under Other Federal Programs: Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies 12 as of June 1994 Superfund Remedial Actions: Treatment Trains with Innovative Treatment Technologies E-23

ix

LIST OF ABREVIATIONS AM APC APEG ARCS ATTIC Action Memorandum Air pollution control Alkaline metal hydroxide/polyethylene glycol Alternative remedial contracts strategy Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center BCD Base catalyzed dechlorination BTEX Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene BTX Benzene, toluene, and xylene cy Cubic yards DCA Dichloroethane DCE Dichloroethylene DEHP Di(2-ethylhexyl phthalate) DLA Defense Logistics Agency DNT Dinitrotoluene EECA Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis ESD Explanation of significant differences FAA Federal Aviation Administration ft Feet FUDS Formerly used defense sites FY Fiscal year gw Ground water IRP Installation Restoration Program KPEG Potassium hydroxide/polyethylene glycol MEK Methyl ethyl ketone MBOCA 4,4' -Methylenebis(2-chloroaniline) NAPL Nonaqueous phase liquids NFEC Navy Facilities Engineering Command
x

NPL OERR OSC OSWER OU PAH PCB PCE PCP PRP RA RCRA RD ROD RPM RSKERL SARA SACM SVOC S/S TCA TCE TIO USACE USDA VOC

National Priorities List Office of Emergency and Remedial Response On-scene coordinator Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Operable unit Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon Polychlorinated biphenyl Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene) Pentachlorophenol Potentially responsible party Remedial action Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Remedial design Record of Decision Remedial project manager Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, Oklahoma (EPA) Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model Semivolatile organic compound Solidification and stabilization Trichloroethane Trichloroethylene Technology Innovation Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Agriculture Volatile organic compound

OVERVIEW Introduction The Technology Innovation Office (TIO) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) has prepared this Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report to document the use of innovative treatment technologies to remediate both Superfund and non-Superfund sites. The report contains site-specific information on Superfund sites (both remedial and removal actions) and non-Superfund sites (sites addressed under other federal programs) at which innovative treatment technologies are being used. Site managers can use this report in evaluating cleanup alternatives. Innovative technology vendors can use it in identifying potential markets. TIO also uses the information to track progress in the application of innovative treatment technologies. The report is updated annually. This September 1994 issue of the report updates and expands information provided in the September 1993 report. Information added to this update includes 60 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in fiscal year (FY) 1993 Superfund records of decision (ROD)a ROD is the decision document used to specify the way a site, or part of a site, will be remediatedand information on 11 additional completed projects. What Are Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies? Alternative treatment technologies are alternatives to land disposal. The most frequently used alternative technologies are incineration and solidification/stabilization. Innovative treatment technologies are alternative treatment technologies for which applications at Superfund and similar sites are inhibited by lack of data on performance and cost. In general, a treatment technology is considered innovative if it has had limited full-scale application. Often, it is the application of a technology or process to soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix waste (such as mining slag) that is innovative. Groundwater treatment after the water has been pumped to the surface often resembles traditional water treatment technologies; thus, in general, pump-and-treat or ex situ groundwater remedies are considered established. In situ bioremediation and other in situ treatment of groundwater, however, are considered innovative technologies. This report documents the use of the following innovative treatment technologies to treat soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix waste: Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Bioremediation (In Situ) Chemical treatment Dechlorination In situ flushing In situ vitrification Soil vapor extraction Soil washing Solvent extraction Thermal desorption Other technologies (e.g., air sparging, contained recovery of oily wastes, limestone barriers, and fuming gasification)

In addition, the remedial sites that are using in-situ bioremediation for groundwater remediation are included with the in situ bioremediation projects. Sources of Information for This Report EPA initially used RODs from individual sites to compile information on remedial actions and pollution reports, on-scene coordinators reports, and the OSWER Removal Tracking System to compile data on emergency response actions. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hazardous, Toxic, Radioactive Waste (HTRW) Mandatory Center of Expertise (Omaha, Nebraska) and the Synopses of Federal

OV-1

Demonstrations of Innovative Site Remediation Technologies, Third Edition (EPA/542/B-93/009) were consulted to compile information on projects under other federal programs. EPA then verified and updated the draft information through interviews with remedial project managers (RPM) and on-scene coordinators (OSC) and other contacts for each site. The data concerning project status do not duplicate data in CERCLIS, EPAs Superfund tracking system. This report provides more detailed information specifically on the portion of the remedy pertaining to an innovative technology. In addition, information about technologies and sites identified here might differ from information found in the ROD annual reports and the RODs database. These differences are the result of design changes in the treatment trains used at sites that may or may not require official documentation (that is, a ROD amendment or an explanation of significant differences (ESD)). Definitions of Specific Innovative Treatment Technologies The innovative treatment technologies reported in the following chapters treat hazardous wastes in very different ways. The following paragraphs define the technologies as they are represented in this document and provide summary statistics on some of the technologies. EX SITU BIOREMEDIATION uses microorganisms to degrade organic contaminants on excavated soil, sludge, and solids. The microorganisms break down the contaminants by using them as a food source. The end products are typically CO2 and H2O. Ex situ bioremediation includes slurry-phase bioremediation, in which the soils are mixed in water to form a slurry, and solid phase bioremediation, in which the soils are placed in a tank or building and tilled with water, and nutrients. Variations of the latter process are called land farming or composting. In applications of IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION, nutrients and an oxygen source are pumped under pressure into the soil or aquifer

through wells, or they are spread on the surface for infiltration to the contaminated material. In CHEMICAL TREATMENT the contaminants are converted to less hazardous compounds through chemical reactions. The technology is most often used to reduce a contaminant (hexavalent chromium to the trivalent form) or oxidize a contaminant (cyanide, for example). Neutralization is considered an available technology and is not included in this report. DECHLORINATION (another type of chemical treatment) results in the removal or replacement of chlorine atoms bonded to hazardous compounds. For IN SITU FLUSHING, large volumes of water, at times supplemented with treatment compounds, are introduced to soil, waste, or groundwater to flush hazardous contaminants from a site. This technology is predicated on the assumption that the injected water can be isolated effectively within the aquifer and recovered. IN SITU VITRIFICATION treats contaminated soil in place at temperatures of approximately 3000F (1600C). Metals are encapsulated in the glass-like structure of the melted silicate compounds. Organics may be treated by combustion. SOIL WASHING is used for two purposes. First, the mechanical action and water (sometimes with additives) physically remove the contaminants from the soil particles. Second, agitation of the soil particles allows the smaller diameter, more highly contaminated fines to separate from the larger soil particles, thus reducing the volume of material requiring further treatment. SOLVENT EXTRACTION operates on the principle that organic contaminants can be solubilized preferentially and removed from the

OV-2

waste in the correct solvent. The solvent used will vary, depending on the waste to be treated. For THERMAL DESORPTION, the waste is heated in a controlled environment to cause organic compounds to volatilize from the waste. The operating temperature for thermal desorption is usually less than 1000F (550C). The volatilized contaminants usually require further control or treatment. SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION removes volatile organic constituents from the soil in place through the use of vapor extraction wells, sometimes combined with air injection wells, to strip and flush the contaminants into the air stream for further treatment. OTHER TECHNOLOGIES include air sparging and the contained recovery of oily wastes (CROW), limestone barriers, and fuming gasification technologies. Air sparging involves injecting air into the aquifer to strip or flush volatile contaminants as the air percolates up through the groundwater and is captured by a vapor extraction system. The CROW process displaces oil wastes with steam and hot water.

The contaminated oils and groundwater are swept into a more permeable area and are pumped out of the aquifer. Limestone barriers act like chemical slurry walls. Contaminated groundwater comes into contact with the barrier and pH increases. The increase in pH effectively immobilizes dissolved metals and neutralizes the soil. Fuming gasification is a thermal treatment process that purges contaminants from solids and soils as metal fumes and organic vapors. The organic vapors can be burned as fuel and the metal fumes can be recovered and recycled. The following sections contain summary information and analysis on sites at which innovative treatment technologies are being or have been applied. Section 1 covers all Superfund sites implementing an innovative treatment technology under a remedial action. These actions are usually documented in a ROD. Section 2 provides information on Superfund removal action sites. Removals are conducted in response to an immediate threat caused by a release of hazardous substances.* Section 3 covers non-Superfund sites or sites being addressed under other federal programs.

* Historically, remedial and removal actions operate under different procedural guidelines. The EPA currently is revising the Superfund process under the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM). Under SACM, EPA will adopt a continuous process for assessing site specific conditions and the need for action. Risks will be reduced quickly through early remedial or removal action. OV-3

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

SECTION 1: SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS Frequency of Technology Selection ROD Statistics As of April, 1994, there are 1,287 sites on the National Priorities List (NPL), excluding 58 sites deleted from the NPL. 1,207 RODs (including ROD Amendments) had been signed. Most RODs for remedial actions address the source of contamination, such as soil, sludge, sediments, solid-type wastes, and nonaqueous phase liquids (NAPL). These RODs are referred to as source control RODs. Other RODs address ground water only or specify that no action is necessary. Figure 1 shows the number of source control RODs compared with the total number of RODs for each fiscal year. FIGURE 1 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: RODS SIGNED BY FISCAL YEAR
(Total Number of RODs = 1,117)
196

An analysis of source control RODs allows a comparison of the frequency of selection of treatment with that of selection of containment or disposal to remedy contamination at sites. Source control RODs are classified by the general type of technology selected: (1) RODs specifying some alternative treatment, (2) RODs specifying containment or disposal only, and (3) RODs specifying other action (such as land use restrictions, monitoring, or relocation). Figure 1 shows the number of source control RODs that fall under each category. RODs in which some treatment is selected may include containment of treatment residuals or of waste from another part of the site. FIGURE 2 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SOURCE CONTROL RODS BY FISCAL YEAR

200 180 160 140

168 172

190

180 160 Treatment

2 2 106 100 3 29 28 57 60 53 105 37 33 26 77 69 87 86 84 36 26 125 119 34 31 141 7 4

Total RODs
153

Source Control RODs

143 125 106

141 119 119

140 120

Containment, Disposal Only Other (Institutional Controls, Monitoring, Relocation)

119

Number of 100 RODs

80 60
38 69 57

120
100 84 77 60 53

Number 100 of 80 RODs

60 40
23

40 20 0
4 4 13 7

23

20 0

3 4

17 6

19

27

27

82

83

84

85

86

87 88 Fiscal Year

89

90

91

92

93

82

83

84

85

86

87 88 89 Fiscal Year

90

91

92

93

The difference between the total number of RODs and the number of source control RODs is the number of "groundwater remedy only" or "no action needed" RODs. Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.

Overall, 64 percent of source control RODs have selected at least one treatment technology for source control (Figure 3). The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) required that EPA favor permanent remedies (that is, alternative treatment) over containment or disposal to remediate Superfund sites. In each of the past six years at least 70 percent of source control RODs contained provisions for the treatment of wastes. The increase is most dramatic FIGURE 3 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: OVERVIEW OF SOURCE CONTROL RODS THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1993
Other* (19) 2%

FIGURE 4 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL DECISIONS FOR SOURCE CONTROL
100
100%

80
75%

74% 65% 55% 45% 50%

Containment or Disposal Only Some Treatment Some Innovative Treatment

69% 73% 50% 74% 70% 72% 70%

Percent of 60 Source Control Records of Decision 40

25% 26% 33%

37% 34% 28% 30% 24% 22% 27% 24% 22% 33%

36%

Containment or Disposal Only (307) 34% Some Treatment (588) 64%

20
0% 4% 7% 8% 9%

22%

0%

82

83

84

85

86

87 88 89 Fiscal Year

90

91

92

93

Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response

Note: Data for innovative technologies are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for fiscal years 1982 1993 and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1994. More than one technology per site may be used.

* Includes institutional controls, monitoring, and relocation. ( ) Number of RODs Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.

in FY1988. Fifty percent of RODs in FY 1987 selected some treatment for source control, whereas 69 percent of RODs in FY 1988 selected some treatment (Figure 4). The percentage was 72 percent in FY 1993. Figure 4 also illustrates the percentage of RODs selecting at least one innovative technology, as updated by current project status information. Out of a total of 914 source control RODs signed through FY 1993, innovative technologies were selected and are still being considered or used for approximately 29 percent of source control RODs. Overall, 22 percent of all RODs have included innovative technologies.
2

Technology Statistics Another way of illustrating the greater use of treatment is by quantifying the number and kinds of treatment technologies selected and used. Most of the remainder of the information contained in this chapter focuses on technologies, rather than RODs. In each ROD in which treatment was specified, several alternative treatment technologies may have been selected. Through FY 1993, 642 treatment technologies have been selected in 588 source control RODs specifying some treatment. In addition, EPA has selected in situ treatment of ground water for 24 remedial sites for a total 666 treatment technologies. EPA selected in situ

treatment of groundwater for three remedial sites in FY 1993. The selection of multiple technologies results from the use of treatment trains or from the treatment of different wastes or areas of the site. For the 588 RODs specifying treatment for source control, Figure 5 lists each type of treatment technology selected and how often it has been selected or used for source control. Figure 5 illustrates that, through FY 1993, 44 percent of the 666 treatment technologies selected were

innovative and 56 percent were established. Table A-1, appearing in Appendix A, contains summary information on the innovative treatment technology projects at remedial sites. Table A-2 lists sites using established technologies. Information on the established treatment technologies is based on a review by the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR) rather than interviews of Regional or State staff.

FIGURE 5 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES SELECTED THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1993
(Total Number of Technologies = 666)
Innovative Technologies # (290) 44% Established Technologies (376) 56% Soil Washing (15) 2% Solvent Extraction (4) < 1% Ex Situ Bioremediation (38) 6% In Situ Bioremediation (30) 5% In Situ Flushing (18) 3% On-Site Incineration (73) 11%

Off-Site Incineration (102) 15%

Soil Vapor Extraction (121) 18%

Solidification/Stabilization (190) 29% Other Established (11) 2%

N t D t d i df 1982 1993 R d fD i i (ROD ) f fi l

Dechlorination (5) < 1% In Situ Vitrification (2) < 1% Chemical Treatment (1) < 1% Thermal Desorption (41) 6% Other Innovative (15) 2%
d ti i t dd i d t ti ti iti f

Note: Data are derived from 1982 1993 Records of Decision (RODs) for fiscal years and anticipated design and construction activities as of July 1994. More than one technology per site may be used. () * # Number of times this technology was selected or used. "Other" established technologies are soil aeration, in situ flaming, and chemical neutralization. "Other" innovative technologies are air sparging, contained recovery of oily wastes, limestone barriers, and fuming gasification. Includes 24 in situ groundwater treatment remedies.

Figure 6 compares the numbers of established and innovative technologies by fiscal year. The figure indicates that more innovative technologies than established technologies have been selected in RODs in fiscal years 1991 and 1993. Figure 7 compares the number of innovative technologies selected with the number of sites. This graph illustrates that some sites are using more than one innovative technology, often together in treatment trains. The figure also

indicates that the ratio of innovative technologies to sites has increased every year since FY 1986. Figure 8 gives the frequency of selection for each innovative technology by fiscal year. Figure 9 shows the frequency of selection for the four most frequently selected innovative treatment technologies, including soil vapor extraction by fiscal year.

FIGURE 6 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: NUMBER OF ESTABLISHED VERSUS INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
70 60 50 Number of 40 Treatment Technologies 30 Selected 20
12 18 67

FIGURE 7 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: NUMBER OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES VERSUS CORRESPONDING RODS
Total Technologies = 290 Total RODs = 231
70
63

Established Technologies Innovative Technologies

58 53 53

63 52

53

60 50

RODs Technologies
50 42 52 40

53

42

50 40 41

26

24

Number of Treatment 40 Technologies or 30 RODs 20

40 37 24 32 37

21

10 0
0 1 4 0 0 1

10
1 1

6 5

82

83

84

85

86

87 88 Fiscal Year

89

90

91

92

93

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

Fiscal Year

Note:

Data for innovative technologies are derived from Records of Decision (RODs) for fiscal years 1982 1993 and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1994. More than one technology per site may be used.

Note:

Data derived from 1982 1993 Records of Decision (ROD) and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1994. Number of RODs in a fiscal year usually equals the number of sites.

FIGURE 8 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY YEAR

Fiscal Year Technology Soil Vapor Extraction Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Thermal Desorption Bioremediation (In Situ) Soil Washing In Situ Flushing Other Dechlorination Solvent Extraction Chemical Treatment Vitrification TOTAL 1984 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1985 1986 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 6 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1987 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1988 8 4 4 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 24 1989 19 8 2 3 2 3 1 0 3 0 1 42 1990 18 4 7 3 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 40 1991 1992 32 4 10 4 1 4 4 2 1 0 1 63 20 9 4 6 2 4 4 0 0 1 0 50 1993 19 7 9 9 0 2 6 1 0 0 0 53 TOTAL 121 38 41 30 15 18 15 5 4 1 2 290

NOTE: Data derived from Fiscal Year 1982 1993 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1994

FIGURE 9 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TRENDS IN THE SELECTION OF FOUR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES 35
30
Soil Vapor Extraction

25 Number of 20 Times Selected 15 10 5 0 84 85

Bioremediation* Thermal Desorption Soil Washing

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

Fiscal Year

* Also includes in situ groundwater treatment. NOTE: Data derived from Fiscal Year 1982 1993 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1994

Status of Innovative Technology Implementation Many of the innovative technologies documented in this report have been selected in the last several years. The design of such projects typically takes one to three years; therefore, relatively few innovative technologies have been contracted for and installed, and even fewer have been completed (Figure 10). In the next several years, though, many projects now in design should become operational. The summary matrix presents remedial action sites using innovative treatment technologies by status and specific technology. Table E-1 in Appendix E presents detailed information on remedial projects that have been completed. FIGURE 10 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PROJECT STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 1994
Technology
Soil Vapor Extraction Thermal Desorption Ex Situ Bioremediation In Situ Bioremediation Soil Washing In Situ Flushing Dechlorination Solvent Extraction In Situ Vitrification Chemical Treatment Other Innovative Treatment Total

Contaminants Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies The data collected for this report form the basis for an analysis of the classes of contaminants treated by each technology type at remedial action sites. Figure 1-11 provides this information, by technology, for three major contaminant groups: volatile organic compounds (VOC), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC), and metals. For this report, compounds are categorized as VOCs or SVOCs, according to the lists provided in EPAs SW-846 Test Methods 8240 and 8270, respectively. FIGURE 11 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: APPLICATION OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
130 120 110 100

121
VOCs SVOCs Metals

Predesign/ Design Complete/ Project Total In Design Being Installed/ Completed Operational
69 26 24 14 11 14 3 3 1 1 12 178 (61%) 42 7 12 14 3 3 1 1 1 0 3 87 (30%) 10 8 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 25 (9%) 121 41 38 30 15 18 5 4 2 1 15 290

90

Number 80 of Applications 70
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Soil Vapor Extraction Thermal Desorption Bioremediation In Situ Flushing Solvent Extraction Soil Washing

54

28

27 30

25 10 12 9 8 0 4 0 2 13

Innovative Technology

Quantity of Soil Addressed EPA analyzed the quantity of soil treated at 209 sites using innovative treatment technologies, and for which quantity data were available (Figure 12). This analysis provides an indication of the scale of the projects involved.
6

Note: Data are derived from 1982 1993 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities as of June 1994.

Treatment Trains Innovative treatment technologies in this report may be used with established or other innovative treatment technologies in treatment trains. Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material requiring further treatment, to prevent the emission of volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants in a single medium. Appendix E presents the data on treatment trains contained within this report. Tables E-4 and E-5 lists the sites at which treatment trains are being used.

FIGURE 12 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: QUANTITIES OF SOIL TO BE TREATED BY INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES

Technology In Situ Flushing Soil vapor extraction Bioremediation (in situ) Soil washing Sovent extraction Bioremediation (ex situ) Thermal desorption Dechlorination Vitrification Chemical treatment Other TOTAL Number Of Sites With Data (Total Number Of Sites) 11 (18) 86 (121) 12 (30) 15 (15) 4 (4) 32 (38) 38 (41) 3 (5) 2 (2) 1 (1) 5 (15) 209 (290) Quantity (Cubic Yards) Range 5,200 - 650,000 60 - 2,000,000 5,000 - 250,000 1,800 - 200,000 9,000 - 85,000 1,000 - 208,000 1,800 - 130,000 700 - 48,000 1,500 - 5,000 3,000 1,000 - 45,000 Average 90,000 85,000 54,000 35,100 42,000 42,000 21,000 22,000 3,250 3,000 200 Total 990,100 7,346,745 653,450 526,500 167,500 1,304,195 808,200 66,500 6,500 3,000 87,259 11,960,049

SECTION 2: SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS Superfund removal actions are conducted in response to an immediate threat caused by a release of hazardous substances. Removal action decisions are documented in an action memorandum. To date, innovative treatment technologies have been used in relatively few removal actions. The innovative technologies addressed in this report have been used 31 times in 26 removal actions (Figure 13). In addition, infrared incineration, no longer considered innovative, was first used at two removal actions. Many removals involve small quantities of waste or immediate threats requiring quick action to alleviate the hazard. Often, such activities do not lend themselves to on-site treatment approaches. In addition, SARA does not prescribe the same preference for innovative treatment for removals that it does for remedial actions. EPA would like to increase the use of innovative treatment methods to address removal problems. One of the seven initiatives set forth in the EPA directive described in the foreword concerns removal actions. It is expected that innovative treatment technologies will be used more often in the future, for larger, and less time-critical removal actions. Table B-1 in Appendix B provides detailed information for each application of an innovative technology at a removal site. The summary matrix presents summaries by EPA Region and status for all applications of innovative technologies at removal sites. Frequency of Technology Selection Figure 13 lists each type of innovative treatment technology and indicates how often that technology has been selected as a remedy for removal actions. Figure 13 illustrates that chemical treatment was selected most often and represented 23 percent of all applications of innovative treatment technologies at removal sites. Bioremediation (ex situ) was chosen six times and represented 19 percent of all applications of innovative treatment technologies at removal sites.

FIGURE 13 SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS: SUMMARY OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES SELECTED/USED AS OF JUNE 1994
( Total = 31)
Dechlorination (Liquids) (2) 6% In Situ Vitrification (1) 3% Thermal Desorption (2) 6% Soil Vapor Extraction (4) 13% Solvent Extraction (2) 6%

Soil Washing (2) 6% Chemical Treatment (7) 23%

Ex Situ Bioremediation (6) 19% Other (1) 3% In Situ Bioremediation (4) 13%

Note: Data from a survey of EPA Regional Removal Branch chiefs and On-Scene Coordinators. * Includes one in situ groundwater treatment.

( )

Number of times this technology was selected or used.

Status of Innovative Technology Implementation Figure 14 indicates the status of innovative treatment technologies that are being applied at removal action sites. Since removals are responses to an immediate threat and often involve smaller quantities of hazardous wastes than remedials, the implementation of the technology may progress faster at a removal site than at a remedial site. The figure indicates that a large percentage, 58 percent, of removal projects involving innovative treatment technologies have been completed. The Summary Matrix provides information on removal action sites using innovative treatment technologies by status and specific technology. Table E-2 in Appendix E provides detailed information on removal projects that have been completed.

FIGURE 14 SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS: PROJECT STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 1994*
Technology Soil Vapor Extraction Thermal Desorption Ex Situ Bioremediation In Situ Bioremediation # Soil Washing In Situ Flushing Dechlorination Solvent Extraction In Situ Vitrification Other Innovative Treatment Chemical Treatment TOTAL Predesign/ In Design 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (3%) Design Complete/ Being Installed/Operational 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 9 (29%) Project Completed 3 1 3 3 1 0 2 2 0 0 6 21 (68%) Total 4 2 6 4 2 0 2 2 1 1 7 31

Data derived from a survey of EPA Superfund Removal Branch Chiefs and On-Scene Coordinators for each Region.

# Includes one in situ groundwater treatment.

Contaminants Addressed by Innovative Treatment Technologies Figure 15 provides information, by technology, for three major contaminant groups treated at removal action sites: volatile organic compounds (VOC), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC), and metals. For this report, compounds are categorized as VOCs or SVOCs, using the lists provided in EPAs SW-846 Test Methods 8240 and 8270, respectively.

Treatment Trains Innovative treatment technologies in this report may be used together with established or other innovative treatment technologies in treatment trains. Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material requiring further treatment, to prevent the emission of volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants in a single medium. Table E-5 in Appendix E lists the sites at which such treatment trains are being used.

FIGURE 15 SUPERFUND REMOVAL ACTIONS: APPLICATION OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Soil Vapor Extraction Thermal Desorption Bioremediation Solvent Extraction Soil Washing Chemical Treatment 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 3 2 2 2 3 VOCs SVOCs Metals

Innovative Technology
10

SECTION 3: ACTIONS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS This chapter contains available information on projects conducted under other federal programs that are not part of the Superfund program (non-Superfund sites). Many of these projects take place at DoD and DOE facilities. Many of the DoD projects are funded by the Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP), which includes the installation restoration program (IRP) and the formerly used defense sites (FUDS) program in DoD. These sites were identified through various sources of information, including discussions with DoD and DOE personnel. However, this list of sites should not be considered comprehensive. This chapter contains information on the application of innovative technologies at 28 non-Superfund sites. Figure 16 lists each type of innovative treatment technology and the number of times it has been selected as a remedy at a non-Superfund site. Figure 17 indicates the status of innovative technologies being applied at non-Superfund sites. The Summary Matrix provides information on each application by status and EPA Region. Table C-1 in Appendix C provides detailed information on each application. Table E-3 in Appendix E lists details on completed applications.

FIGURE 16 SAMPLE OF PROJECTS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: SUMMARY OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES AS OF JUNE 1994* (Total Number of Technologies = 28)
Other Innovative (1) 4% Dechlorination (1) 4% Soil Washing (2) 7%

Ex Situ Bioremediation (5) 18%

Soil Vapor Extraction (11) 39%

In Situ Bioremediation (8) 28%

Note: () * # Data are derived from a survey of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers sites and projects listed in the Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Innovative Site Remediation Technologies, Second Edition EPA/542/B-92/003. More than one technology per site may be used. Number of times this technology was selected or used. "Other" innovative technologies are air sparging and contained recovery of oily wastes. Inclusion in situ groundwater treatment remedies.

11

FIGURE 17 SAMPLE OF PROJECTS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 1994*

Technology Soil Vapor Extraction Thermal Desorption Ex Situ Bioremediation In Situ Bioremediation # Soil Washing In Situ Flushing Dechlorination Solvent Extraction In Situ Vitrification Other Innovative Treatment Chemical Treatment TOTAL

Predesign/ In Design 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 (18%)

Design Complete/ Being Installed/Operational 5 0 2 6 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 16 (57%)

Project Completed 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 (25%)

Total 11 0 5 8 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 28

* Data derived from a survey of EPA Superfund Removal Branch Chiefs and On-Scene Coordinators for each Region.

Also includes in situ groundwater treatment.

12

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type
ed ia Bi tio or n( em in ed si ia tu Ch tio ) n( em ex ic al sit Tr D u) ec ea hl tm or en in t at In i on Si tu Fl us In hi Si ng tu V itr So ifi il ca V tio ap n or So Ex il tra W ct as io h n So in g lv en tE xt Th ra er ct io m n al D O es th or er pt io n

Region 1

Region 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Site Name, State Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT Linemaster Switch Corporation, CT Silresim, M A Iron Hor se Park, MA Re-Solve, MA Norwood PCBs, MA Cannon Engineering/Bridgewater, MA Groveland Wells, MA Wells G&H OU 1, M A Hocomonco Pond, ESD, MA Union Chemical Co., OU 1, ME O'Connor, ME McKin, ME Mottolo Pig Farm, NH South Municipal Water Supply Well, NH Tinkham Garage ( OU 1), NH Ottati & Goss, NH Tibbetts Road, NH Stamina Mills, RI Picillo Farm Site, RI Peterson/Puritan Inc. (OU 1) , RI

Status D PD I O O D C O O I D D C O I D C PD PD PD PD

Action Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial q

Bi

or e

q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q e qa

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = I nstalled or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; O ther = Action under other f ederal pr ogr ams Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained r ecovery of oily wastes; d = Fuming gasification e = insitu oxidation

13

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type

si tu)

itu )

en t

ct io

Region 2
ia tio n ed m Bi or em or e

(i ns

tio n

re at m

hi n

ic a

ct io n

tra

at io

at io

Fl us

itr if

lT

xt ra

ng

lo rin

as hi

ed i

or

ic a

tE

itu

ap

il W

So lv en

Si tu

er m

em

lV

al

ec h

In S

So i

Ch

Bi

So

In

Th

Region 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Site Name, State A O Polymer, Soil treatment phase, NJ Swope Oil & Chem Co., OU 2, NJ FAA Technical Center, NJ Myers Property, NJ Lipari Landfill ( OU 2), NJ Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2, NJ King of Prussia, NJ Metaltec/Aerosystems, OU 1 - Soil Treatment, NJ Reich Farms, NJ Waldick Aerospace Devices ( OU 1), NJ South Jersey Clothing, NJ Garden State Cleaners, NJ Lipari Landfill Marsh Sediment, NJ Industrial Latex, OU 1, NJ Vineland Chemical, NJ Zschiegner Refining Company, NJ Universal Oil Products, NJ Naval Air Engineering Center, O U 23, NJ Circuitron Corporation, OU 1, NY Mattiace Petrochemicals Company, O U 1, N Y Applied Environmental Services, OU 1, NY

Status D D I D O D C O D C D O I PD C C D D D PD D/I

Action Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Removal Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial q

q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qa q q

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = D esigned but not installed; I = I nstalled or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other f ederal programs Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

14

th e

es o

Ex

rp tio

(e x

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type

si tu)

itu )

en t

ct io

Region 2
tio n ed ia Bi or em or em

(i ns

tio n

re at m

io n

hi n

ic a

ct io

tra

at io

ed ia t

Fl us

itr if

lT

xt ra

ng

lo rin

as hi

or

ic a

tE

itu

ap

il W

So lv en

Si tu

er m

em

lV

al O th e r

ec h

In S

So i

Ch

Region 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Site Name, State Genzale Plating Company, OU 1, NY Signo Trading/Mt. Vernon, NY Wide Beach D evelopment, NY Byron Barrel & Drum, NY American Thermostat, NY Fulton Terminals, Soil Treatment, NY Sarney Farm, NY SMS I nstruments (Deer Park), NY Vestal Water Supply 1- 1, NY Claremont Polychemical - Soil Remedy, NY Solvent Savers, N Y Applied Environmental Services (Groundwater), NY General Motors/Central Foundry Div., OU 2, NY General Motors/Central Foundry Div., OU 1, NY Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, I nc., NY GCL Tie and Treating, NY Reynolds Metals Co. Study Area Site, (RMC), NY GE Wiring Devices, PR Upjohn Manufacturing Co., PR Janssen Inc., PR

Status D C C PD O D D C D D PD I D D D D D D C I

Action Remedial Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial q

Bi

q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = I nstalled or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

15

So

In

Th

es o

Ex

rp tio

(e x

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type

si tu)

itu )

en t

ct io

Region 3
ia tio n ed Bi or em m or e

(i ns

tio n

re at m

hi n

ic a

ct io n

tra

at io

at io

Fl us

itr if

lT

xt ra

ng

lo rin

as hi

ed i

or

ic a

tE

itu

ap

il W

So lv en

Si tu

er m

em

lV

al

ec h

In S

So i

Ch

Bi

So

In

Th

Region 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Site Name, State Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE Cryochem, OU 3, PA Whitmoyer Labor atories, OU 3, PA U.S.A. Letterkenny SE Area, OU1, PA Bendix, PA Lord-Shope Landfill, PA Tyson's Dump, PA Brodhead Creek, OU 1, PA Tonolli Corporation, PA Raymark, PA Brown's Battery Breaking Site, OU 2, PA Saegertown Industrial Area Site, PA William D ick Lagoons, OU 3, PA Arrowhead Associates/Scovill, OU 1, VA Saunders Supply Co, OU 1, VA Avtex Fibers, VA Defense General Supply Center, OU 5, VA Langley AFB, I RP Site 28, VA Rentokil, VA Ordnance Wor ks Disposal Areas, WV

Status PD D D O PD D/I O I PD O PD D PD PD D C C I D D

Action Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Removal Remedial Other Remedial Remedial

q q

q q q q q q qc qb q q q q q q q q q q q q b,d qa

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = D esigned but not installed; I = I nstalled or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other f ederal programs Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

16

th e

es o

Ex

rp tio

(e x

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type

Bi or em

Region 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Site Name, State Ciba-Geigy ( MacIntosh Plant) OU 2, AL Ciba-Geigy ( MacIntosh Plant) OU 4, AL Brown Wood Preserving, FL Dubose Oil Products, FL Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits (amended ROD), FL Hollingsworth Solderless, FL Peak Oil/Bay D rums OU 1, FL Robins AFB, Landf ill / Sludge Lagoon, OU 1, GA General Refining, GA Basket Creek Surface I mpoundment, GA Mathis Brothers - S. Marble Top Road Landfill, GA Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1, KY Southeastern Wood Preserving, M S Charles Macon Lagoon, Lagoon #7, OU 1, NC Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps, (OU 1 & OU 4), NC JADCO-Hughes, NC Carolina Transformer, NC Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC Benf ield Industries, NC Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits, NC JFD Electronics/Channel M aster, NC

Status PD PD C O D D C PD PD C C D O C D PD D D D/I D D D

Action Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Removal Removal Remedial Remedial Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial q

Bi

q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q

Stat us: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = O perational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = A ction under other f ederal programs Other t echnologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained r ecovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

17

in ed si ia tu tio ) n( em ex ic al si tu) Tr D ec ea hl tm or en in t at In i on Si tu Fl us In hi Si ng tu V itr So ifi il ca V tio ap n or So Ex il t ra W ct as io h n in So g lv en tE xt Th ra er ct io m n al D O es th or er pt io n Ch

Region 4
ed

or em

ia tio n(

q q

q q

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type

Bi or em

Region 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Site N ame, State FCX-Washington Site, NC USMC Camp Lejeune M ilitary Base, OU 2, NC Hinson Chemical, SC SCRDI Bluff Road, SC Medley Farm, O U 1, SC Wamchem, SC Sangamo/Twelve-Mile/Hartwell PCB, OU 1, SC Savannah River D OE, M Area Settling Basin, SC CSX McCormick Derailment Site, SC Rochester Property, SC Helena Chemical, SC Para-Chem Southern, Inc., SC Arlington Blending & Packaging Co., OU 1, TN Carrier Air Conditioning, TN

Status I D C D D/I C D O C PD D PD D D/I

Action Removal Remedial Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Other Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial q q

Bi

q q

q q q

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs Other t echnologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained r ecovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

18

si tu) re at m lo en rin t at In i on Si tu Fl us In hi Si ng tu V itr So ifi il ca V tio ap n or So Ex il tra W ct as io h n in So g lv en tE xt Th ra er ct io m n al D O es th or er pt io n D ec h lT

(i ns tio n ed ia ed ia t or em

itu ) io n Ch em

Region 4

ic a

(e x

q q q q q q q q q q a q a

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type

si tu)

itu )

en t

ct io

Region 5
tio n ed ia Bi or em or em

(i ns

tio n

re at m

io n

hi n

ic a

ct io

tra

at io

ed ia t

Fl us

itr if

lT

xt ra

ng

lo rin

as hi

or

ic a

tE

itu

ap

il W

So lv en

Si tu

er m

em

lV

al O th e r

ec h

In S

So i

Ch

Region 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Site N ame, State Galesburg/Koppers, I L Outboard Marine/Waukegan H arbor, OU 3, I L Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. OU 3 & OU 6, I L Enviro. Cons. and Chem. (ROD Amend), I N Main Street Well Field, IN Seymour Recycling, IN Fisher Calo Chem, IN MIDCO I , IN Wayne Waste Reclamation, IN Seymour Recycling ( Ground water), I N MIDCO I I, I N American Chemical Services, I N Indiana Wood Treating, IN Reilly Tar and Chemical, I N Ninth Avenue Dump, I N Carter I ndustries, MI Sturgis Municipal Well Field, M I Chem Central, MI ThermoChem, I nc. OU 1, MI Verona Well Field, OU 2, MI Anderson Development (ROD Amendment), M I

Status D C D D D C D PD D/I O PD PD O PD C D PD D D O C

Action Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial

q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = D esigned but not installed; I = I nstalled or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other f ederal programs Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

19

Bi

So

In

Th

es o

Ex

rp tio

(e x

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type
ed ia Bi tio or n em (in ed sit ia u) Ch tio n( em ex ic al si tu Tr D ) ec ea hl tm or en in t at In i o Si n tu Fl us In hi Si ng tu V itr So ifi il ca V tio ap n or So Ex il t ra W ct as io hi n So ng lv en tE xt Th ra er ct io m n al D O es th or er pt io n

Region 5
Bi or

Region 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Site Name, State Cliffs/Dow Dump, MI PBM Enterprises (Van Dusen Airport Service), MI Ionia City Landfill, MI Parsons Chemical ( ETM Enterprise), M I Kysor of Cadillac I ndustrial, M I Springfield Township Dump, MI Verona Well Field (T. Solv/Raymond Rd), MI Rasmussen Dump, MI Saginaw Bay Confined Disposal Facility, M I Electro- Voice, OU 1, MI Clare Water Supply, MI Peerless Plating, M I Duell-Gardner Landfill, MI Ott/Stor y/Cordova Chemical, MI Burlington Northern RR Tie Treating Plant, MN Joslyn M anufacturing and Supply Co., MN Twin Cities A rmy Ammunition Plant, M N Long Prairie Groundw ater Contamination, MN Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2, OH Zanesville Well Field, OH Zanesville Well Field, OH

Status D C D C D D C D C PD PD D PD D O O O D/I D PD D

Action Remedial Removal Remedial Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Other Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial q

em

q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q f

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = I nstalled or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial A ction; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs Other technologies: a = A ir sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

20

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type

si tu)

itu

en t

ra ct io

Region 5
ia tio n ed Bi or em m or e

(i ns

at io n

ex

ct io n Ex t ra en t er m al Th

in at io

itr ifi c

rE xt

at io

Fl us

hi ng

lT

ed i

ic a

ap o

lo r

itu

il W

Si tu

em

lV

as

So i

Region 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Bi

So

In

So lv

Ch

In S

Site Name, State Pristine (ROD Ammendment), OH Pristine (ROD Ammendment), OH Miami County Incinerator, OH Skinner Landfill, ( 002), OH Muskago Sanitary Landf ill, WI Wausau Groundwater Contamination Moss American, WI Moss American, WI Hagen Farm Site, Ground water, WI Hagen Farm Source Control OU, WI Onalaska M unicipal Landfill, WI City Disposal Corporation Landfill, WI

Status I C D PD D/I O PD PD D O O PD

Action Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial q q

q q q q q q q q q q

Stat us: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = O perational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = A ction under other f ederal programs Other t echnologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained r ecovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

21

th er

ec h

es or pt

hi ng

n(

re at

io n

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type
m ed ia Bi tio or n em (in ed si ia tu Ch tio ) n( em e ic x al sit Tr D u) ec ea hl tm or en in t at In i on Si tu Fl us In hi Si ng tu V itr So ifi il ca V tio ap n or So Ex il tra W ct as io h n So in g lv en tE xt Th ra er ct io m n al D O es th or er pt io n

Region 6

Region 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

Site Name, State Arkwood, AR MacMillan Ring Free Oil Company, AR Popile, AR Old I nger Oil Refinery, LA Pab Oil & Chemical Services, LA American Creosote Works, I nc. (Winnfield) , LA Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis, NM Prewitt Abandoned Refinery, NM Holloman AFB, Main POL A rea, NM Holloman AFB, BX Service Station, NM Traband Warehouse, O K Oklahoma Refining Co., OK Petro-Chemical Systems, I nc., OU 2, TX North Cavalcade Street, TX Sheridan Disposal Services, TX French Limited, TX South Cavalcade Street, TX Koppers/Texarkana, TX United Creosoting, TX Kelly A FB, Site 1100, TX Matagor da Island AF Range, TX Baldwin Waste Oil, TX

Status D I PD O PD D/I O PD D D C D PD D PD C PD D D/I O C C

Action Remedial Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Other Other Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Other Other Removal q q q q q q q

Bi

or e

q q q q q

q q q q

q q q q q q q q q q q qa

Stat us: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = O perational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = A ction under other f ederal programs Other t echnologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained r ecovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

22

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type

Region 7
Bi or em si tu) re at m lo en rin t at In i on Si tu Fl us In hi Si ng tu V itr So ifi il ca V tio ap n or So Ex il tra W ct as io h n in So g lv en tE xt Th ra er ct io m n al D O es th or er pt io n D ec h lT (i ns tio n ed ia ed ia t Ch or em itu ) io n em ic a (e x

Region 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

Site N ame, State Vogel Paint & Wax, IA People's Natural Gas, IA Chemplex (OU 2) , IA McGraw Edison, IA Coleman Operable Unit 29th and M ead, KS Pester Refinery Co., KS Scott Lumber, MO Crown Plating, MO Lee Chemical, MO Hastings GW Contamination (Colorado Ave), NE Hastings GW Contamination (Far-Mar Co.), NE Hastings GW Contamination, Well No. 3, N E Lindsay M anufacturing, NE Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE Sherwood M edical, NE

Status O D/I PD PD PD PD C C O D D C D O PD

Action Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Removal Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial q

q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = D esigned but not installed; I = I nstalled or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other f ederal programs Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

23

Bi

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type
ed ia Bi tio or n em (in ed sit ia u) Ch tio n( em e ic x al sit Tr D u) ec ea hl tm or en in t at In i on Si tu Fl us In hi Si ng tu V itr So ifi il ca V tio ap n or So Ex il tra W ct as io h n So in g lv en tE xt Th ra er ct io m n al D O es th or er pt io n

Region 8

Region 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Site Name, State Sand Creek Industrial, O U 5, CO Sand Creek Industrial OU 1, CO Chemical Sales Company, OU 1, CO Martin M arietta (Denver Aerospace), CO Rocky Mtn Arsenal OU 18, interim r esp., CO Ft. Carson, CO Rocky Flats OU 2, I nterim Remedial Action, CO Broderick Wood Products OU 2, CO Burlington Nor thern ( Somers Plant), MT Libby Ground Water Contamination, M T For mer G lasgow AFB, MT Idaho Pole Company, MT Mouat I ndustries, MT Montana Pole and Treating Plant, M T Montana Pole/Treating (Ground water), MT Wasatch Chemical, UT Utah Power and Light/American Barrel, UT Mystery Bridge Road/Highway 20, OU 2, WY

Status O O D D C O O O O O I D O PD PD C PD O

Action Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Other Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Other Remedial Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Removal q q q q q q q

Bi

or em

q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q a q q

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs Other t echnologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

24

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type
ed ia Bi tio or n em (in ed sit ia u) Ch tio n( em e ic x al sit Tr D u) ec ea hl tm or en in t at In i on Si tu Fl us In hi Si ng tu V itr So ifi il ca V tio ap n or So Ex il tra W ct as io h n So in g lv en tE xt Th ra er ct io m n al D O es th or er pt io n

Region 9

Region 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

Site Name, State Aua Fuel Farm, Aua Village, American Samoa, Indian Bend Wash, South Area, OU 1, AZ Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ Stanford Pesticide #1, A Z Motor ola 52nd Street, A Z Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Area (N. & S. Fac), AZ Luke AFB, AZ Davis Monthan AFB, Site 35, AZ Davis Monthan AFB, AZ Hassayampa Landfill, AZ Indian Bend Wash, AZ Williams AFB, (OU2), AZ National Semiconductor (Monolith M emories), CA Spectra Physics, OU 1, CA J.H. Baxter, CA Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville Plant), CA Roseville Drums, CA Solvent Service, CA Fairchild Semiconductor ( San Jose), CA Fairchild Semiconductor /MTV-I, CA Fairchild Semiconductor /MTV-II, CA IBM ( San Jose), CA

Status O D C C D O C I C D D O O O D D/I C O C D/I D/I O

Action Other Remedial Removal Removal Remedial Remedial Other Other Other Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial q q

Bi

or em

q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs Other t echnologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

25

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type
ed ia Bi tio or n em (in ed sit ia u) Ch tio n em ( e ic x al sit Tr D u) ec ea hl tm or en in t at In i on Si tu Fl us In hi Si ng tu V itr So ifi il ca V tio ap n or So Ex il t ra W ct as io h n So in g lv en tE xt Th ra er ct io m n al D O es th or er pt io n

Region 9

Region 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

Site Name, State Intel, Mountain View, CA Intersil/Siemens, CA Raytheon, Mountain View, CA Watkins-Johnson, CA Monolithic Memories/AMD - Arques, SU 2, CA Van Waters and Rogers, CA Pacific Coast Pipeline, CA Sacramento A rmy Depot, Tank 2 OU, CA USMC, Mtn. Warfare Center, Bridgeport, CA Seal Beach Navy Weapons Station I R Site 14, CA McClellan AFB OUD, CA Ft. Ord Marina, Fritzche AAF Fire Drill Area, CA Purity Oil Sales OU 2, CA Jasco Chemical Co., CA Signetics (AMD 901) ( TRW), Signetics OU, CA Lawrence Livermor e National Labor atory, CA Sacramento A rmy Depot ( Burn Pits OU), CA Lorentz Barrel and Drum ( OU 1), CA Hexcel, CA Intersil, CA U. S. Public Works Center, Guam, GU Poly-Carb, NV

Status D O D I O O D C C D O C PD D O D O PD PD C O C

Action Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Other Other Other Other Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Other Removal

Bi

or em

q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qa q q

Status: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = Installed or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other federal programs Other t echnologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained recovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

26

Site Status and Technology Summary Matrix

Technology Type

Region 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

Site Name, State Ft. Wainwright, AK Eielson Air For ce Base, AK Union Pacific Railroad Sludge Pit, ID United Chrome Products, OR Gould, I nc., OR Umatilla Army Depot Activity, Soil Op Unit, OR Commencement Bay/S. Tacoma Well 12A, WA Naval Submarine Base, Bangor Site A, OU 1, WA Drexler - RAMCOR, WA Harbor I sland, WA Fairchild A FB OU 1 Craig Rd LF., WA Fairchild A FB, Priority 1 OU's ( OU 2) FT-1, WA For t Lewis Mil Res. Lf 4 & Sol. Refined Coal, WA Bonneville Power Administration, OU A, WA Naval Communication Station, Scottland

Status O O PD O O D/I O I C PD D D D I C

Action Other Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Removal Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial Remedial

q q q

Bi or

q q

q q q q q q q q q q qa q a

Stat us: PD = Predesign; D = Design; D/I = Designed but not installed; I = I nstalled or being installed; O = Operational; C = Complete Action: Remedial = Superfund Remedial Action; Removal = Superfund Removal Action; Other = Action under other f ederal pr ogr ams Other technologies: a = Air sparging; b = Limestone barriers; c = Contained r ecovery of oily wastes; and d = Fuming gasification

* Naval Communication Station is located in Scottland, not in Region 10.

27

ed ia Bi tio or n em (in ed sit ia u) tio Ch n( em ex ic al si tu Tr D ) ec ea hl tm or en in t at In i o Si n tu Fl us In hi Si ng tu V i tri So fic il at V io ap n or So Ex il t ra W ct as io hi n So ng lv en tE xt Th ra er ct io m n al D O es th or er pt io n

Region 10

em

Appendix A Updates/Changes/Deletions

Summary of Updates/Changes/Deletions Each edition of this report has added new information on the applications of innovative technologies at Superfund sites and has updated the status of existing innovative projects. The information added from ROD's from previous fiscal years that was deleted, or changed in each edition (from the first edition of the report published in January 1991 through this 5th edition) is described below to allow tracking of specific projects from edition to edition. Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 1st edition report (January 1991) to the 2nd edition report (September 1991).
2nd Edition Region 3 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Leetown Pesticides, WV (03/31/86) Technology (Listed in 1st Edition) Bioremediation Added Deleted Yes Changed to No further action. Risk reevaluated and was determined that risk was not sufficient for remedial action. During remedial design, sampling indicated VOCs were no longer present in the soils. Heavy metals remained at the surface. An ESD was issued on 12/92. Remedy will consist of capping the site. Misinterpretation of ROD during ROD analysis Comments Contacts/Phone Andy Palestini 215-597-1286 Philip Rotstein 215-597-9023 Kate Lose 215-597-0910

Harvey-Knott Drum, DE (09/30/85)

In Situ Soil Flushing

Yes

SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY (09/29/89)

Thermal Desorption

Yes (changed to soil vapor extraction in 3rd edition)

Miko Fayon 212-264-4706

1 2 6 10

Re-Solve, MA (09/24/87) GE Wiring Services, PR (09/30/88)

Chemical Treatment Chemical Extraction

Dechlorination Reclassified technology Soil Washing Reclassified technology

Lorenzo Thantu 617-223-5500 Caroline Kwan 212-264-0151 John Meyer 214-655-6735 Christine Psyk 206-553-6519

Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers, TX Chemical Treatment (03/25/88) Northwest Transformer, WA (09/15/89) In Situ Vitrification Yes

Dechlorination Reclassified technology Technology dropped because commercial availability was delayed

Note:

The 2nd edition report also added information on 45 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1990 RODs and 18 innovative treatment technologies used in removal actions. A-1

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 2nd edition report (September 1991) to the 3rd edition report (April 1992).
3rd Edition Region 2 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Marathon Battery, NY (09/30/88) Technology (Listed in 2nd Edition) Thermal Desorption Added Deleted Yes Changed to During design soil gas concentration at hot spots was below NY state standards. GW monitoring will continue. Incorrectly classified. Actually conducting pump and treat with treated water being reinjected Thermal Desorption Yes Yes Incineration Possible pre-wash of debris with surfactants Problems due to the presence of furans. Incineration likely Comments Contacts/Phone Pam Tames 212-264-1036

Goose Farm, NJ (09/27/85)

In Situ Soil Flushing

Yes

Laura Lombardo 212-264-6989 Caroline Kwan 212-264-0151 Tony Best 404-347-2643

2 4 5

GE Wiring Services, PR (09/30/88)

Soil Washing

Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving, FL Soil Washing (09/26/90) Sangamo/Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge, IL (08/01/90) Anderson Development, MI (09/28/90) In Situ Vitrification

ROD specified the remedy as in situ Nan Gowda vitrification or incineration. 312-353-9236 Incineration was chosen Because of concern by the community the remedy was changed. ROD amendment signed 9/30/91, and ESD was signed 10/2/92 Cleanup levels reached by natural attenuation Jim Hahnenberg 312-353-4213

In Situ Vitrification

Thermal Desorption

5 6 6

U.S. Aviex, MI (09/07/88) Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis, NM (09/23/88) Crystal Chemical, TX (09/27/90)

In Situ Flushing Bioremediation (ex situ) In Situ Vitrification

Yes Yes Yes

Robert Whippo 312-886-4759 Ky Nichols 214-655-6783

Remedy reconsidered after delay in commercial availability of technology. Vitrification considered for hot spots only. Revised remedy will consist of capping and off-site disposal/consolidation of soils. ROD was misinterpreted during ROD analysis

Lisa Price 214-655-6735

Solvent Service, CA (09/27/90)

Bioremediation (in situ)

Yes

Kevin Graves 510-286-0435 Steve Morse (CA) 570-286-0304

Note:

The 3rd edition report also added information on 70 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1991 RODs. A-2

3rd Edition Region 9 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Poly Carb, NV (Removal) Technology (Listed in 2nd Edition) Bioremediation (ex situ) Added Deleted Changed to Bioremediation (in situ)

Comments Contacts/Phone Reclassified technology Bob Mandel 415-744-2290

A-3

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 3rd edition report (April 1992) to the 4th edition report (October 1992).
4th Edition Region 2 2 5 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Lipari Landfill Marsh Sediment, NJ (07/11/88) GE Wiring Services PR (09/30/88) University of Minnesota, MN (06/11/90) Technology (Listed in 3rd Edition) None Thermal Desorption Thermal Desorption Yes Added Thermal Desorption Soil Washing Incineration in 5th edition Issued an ESD in August 1991 to change remedy to Thermal Desorption or Incineration. Incineration was chosen because it was less expensive Deleted Changed to Missed during original ROD analysis Comments Contacts/Phone Tom Graff 816-426-2296 Caroline Kwan 212-264-0151 Darrel Owens 312-886-7089

6 6 9 9 10

Sol Lynn/Industrial Dechlorination Transformers, TX (03/25/88) Koppers/Texarkana, TX (09/23/88) Poly Carb, NV (Removal) Teledyne Semiconductors, CA (03/22/91) Gould Battery (03/31/88)

Dechlorination Soil Washing Bioremediation (in situ) Soil Vapor Extraction Soil Washing Soil Washing In Situ Flushing

Yes

Discontinued due to implementation John Meyer difficulties 214-655-6735 Remedy added by ROD amendment Ursula Lennox 214-655-6735 Bioremediation (ex situ) Reclassified technology Mistakenly deleted from report Missed during original ROD analysis Bob Mandel 415-744-2290 Sean Hogan 415-744-2233 Chip Humphries 503-326-2678

Yes

Note:

The 4th edition report also added information on 10 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial action in FY 1992 RODs, and 21 innovative treatment technologies at non-Superfund sites.

A-4

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993).
5th Edition Region 1 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Re-Solve, MA (09/24/87) Technology Listed in 4th Edition Dechlorination Added Deleted Yes Changed to Comments Contacts/Phone Pilot study showed that Joe Lemay dechlorination increased the volume 617-573-9622 and that the waste still needed to be incinerated. An ESD to incinerate residuals off-site is in peer review. Will incinerate off-site Remedy involves pump and treat with on-site discharge. Soil is not being targeted. Remedy involves pump and treat with on-site discharge. Soil is not being targeted. Remedy involves pump and treat with on-site discharge. Soil is not being targeted. Thermal desorption not needed because highly contaminated soil will be incinerated off-site instead. Remainder will be stabilized. ESD issued. Will conduct ex situ passive volatilization Ross Gilleland 617-573-5766 Jeff Gratz 212-264-6667 Jeff Gratz 212-264-6667 Jeff Gratz 212-264-6667 Ed Finnerty 212-264-3555

1 2

Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (05/30/89) Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 1, NJ (02/04/91) Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 2, NJ (02/04/91) Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 4, NJ (02/04/91) Caldwell Trucking, NJ (09/25/86)

Solvent Extraction In Situ Flushing

Yes Yes

In Situ Flushing

Yes

In Situ Flushing

Yes

Thermal Desorption

Yes

Tobylanna Army Depot, PA (Non-Superfund project)

Bioremediation (in situ)

Yes

Drew Lausch 215-597-3161 Ross Mantione (Tobyhanna) 717-894-6494 Tony DeAngelo 404-347-7791

Smith's Farm Brooks (09/30/91)

Dechlorination

Thermal Desorption

Will alter chemistry to achieve dechlorination during thermal desorption.

Note:

The 5th edition report also adds information on 49 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1992 RODs, and 15 innovative treatment technologies used in removal actions. A-5

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993). (continued)
5th Edition Region 4 Site Name, State (ROD Date) American Creosote Works, FL (09/28/89) Technology Listed in 4th Edition Soil Washing Added Deleted Yes Changed to Bench-scale study of soil washing showed that the concentrations of carcinogenic PAHs were not adequately reduced. Also discovered dioxins at much higher concentrations Bench-scale study of bioremediation (ex situ) showed that the concentrations of carcinogenic PAHs were not adequately reduced. Also discovered dioxins at much higher concentrations Comments Contacts/Phone Mark Fite 404-347-2643

American Creosote Works, FL (09/28/89)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Yes

Mark Fite 404-347-2643

4 5

Hollingsworth Solderless, FL (04/10/86) Cliffs/Dow Dump, MI (09/27/89)

None Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil Vapor Extraction Yes

Listed as soil aeration in 3rd edition John Zimmerman 404-347-2643 Bioremediation (in situ) was a Ken Glatz misinterpretation of the ROD. All 312-886-1434 soil will be excavated and treated by bioremediation (ex situ). Remedy has been suspended Mike Overbay because of implementation 214-655-8512 difficulties and escalating cost. Cost doubled from cost projected in ROD. Issuing ROD amendment to cap in place. Pilot study showed in situ bioremediation was too costly. It appears that the present pump and treat system will be able to achieve cleanup levels. Thermal Desorption Soil washing did not meet performance standards and was expensive. ROD amendment issued early September 1993. Bruce Morrison 913-551-7755

Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (09/27/90)

Dechlorination

Yes

Fairfield Coal & Gas, IA (09/21/90)

Bioremediation (in situ)

Yes

Sand Creek Industrial OU 5, CO (09/28/90)

Soil Washing

Erna Acheson 303-294-1971

A-6

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993). (continued)
5th Edition Region 9 9 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Koppers Company (Oroville), CA (04/04/90) Signetics (AMD 901) TRW OU, CA (09/11/91) Technology Listed in 4th Edition Bioremediation (Ex Situ) None Soil Vapor Extraction Added Deleted Yes Changed to Misinterpretation of ROD during ROD analysis Remedy added Comments Contacts/Phone Fred Schlauffler 415-744-2365 Joe Healy 415-744-2331 Kevin Graves (CA) 510-286-0435 Sean Hogan 415-744-2233 Linda Meyer 206-553-6636 Nolan Jenson (DOE) 208-526-0436 Linda Meyer 206-553-6636 Nolan Jenson (DOE) 208-526-0436

9 10

Teledyne Semiconductors, CA (09/30/91) IDEL Warm Waste Pond, ID (12/05/91)

None Acid Extraction

Soil Vapor Extraction Yes

Dropped by mistake from 4th edition Treatability study of acid extraction did not achieve good extraction rates. Did not reduce the volume of waste. Will excavate, consolidate and cap. Treatability study of soil washing did not achieve results. Did not reduce the volume of waste. Will excavate, consolidate and cap.

10

IDEL Warm Waste Pond, ID (12/05/93)

Soil Washing

Yes

A-7

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994).
6th Edition Region 1 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Union Chemical Co., OU 1, ME (12/27/90) Technology Listed in 5th Edition Thermal Desorption Added Deleted Changed to Soil Vapor Extraction Determined that SVE would be more cost effective. ESD signed March/April 1994. Comments Contacts/Phone Terry Connelly 617-573-9638 Christopher Rushton (ME DEP) 207-287-2651 Darryl Luce 617-573-5767 Mike Robinette (NH) 603-271-2014 Kim O'Connell 212-264-8127 (temporary)

Tibbetts Road, NH (09/29/92)

In Situ Soil Flushing

Yes

Misinterpretation of ROD during ROD analysis. Soil was not targeted for treatment. Re-evaluation of site found significantly less contaminated soil than original estimates. Soil will be disposed off site. ESD signed July 1994. Misinterpretation of the ROD during ROD analysis.

Ewan Property, OU2, NJ (09/29/89)

Soil Washing, Solvent Extraction

Yes

Naval Air Engineering Center, OU 7, Interim Action, NJ (03/16/92)

In Situ Flushing

Yes

Jeff Gratz 212-264-6667 Robert Wing 212-264-8670

Solvent Savers, NY (09/30/90)

Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

SVE is a secondary remedy which Lisa Wong may be used instead of thermal 212-264-9348 desorption, the primary remedy, if treatability studies show to be effective. Neutralization with lime (Ex Situ) Treatability studies indicated that the technology was not feasible. ESD under preparation. Facility no longer in operation. Can now excavate. Remedies being considered include thermal desorption. Vance Evans 215-597-8485 Jeff Howard (VA) 804-762-4203 Andy Palestini 215-597-1286

U.S. Titanium, VA (11/21/89)

In Situ Flushing

L.A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soils), VA (03/31/88)

Bioremediation (In Situ)

Yes

Note:

The 6th edition report also adds information on xx innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs. A-8

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
6th Edition Region 3 Site Name, State (ROD Date) L.A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soils), VA (03/31/88) Technology Listed in 5th Edition In Situ Flushing Added Deleted Yes Changed to Facility no longer in operation. Can now excavate. Remedies being considered include thermal desorption. Re-use as fuel off-site Technology changed because of uncertainty about the ability of bioremediation to reach treatment goals. ESD signed 3/94. Only conducted air injection to facilitate pump and treat. Vapors were not extracted. Further investigation revealed that the Vadose Zone was not an area of concern. Groundwater not being treated. Only soil is being treated. Land Treatment Land treatment determined to be more cost effective. Yes Treatability study indicated that the technology could not treat the contaminants of concern because of materials problems. Will excavate and dispose off-site. ROD Amendment signed 3/94. Waste will be disposed off-site more cost effectively Another disposal method likely to be used. Comments Contacts/Phone Andy Palestini 215-597-1286

L.A. Clarke & Sons, Lagoon Sludge OU, VA (03/31/88)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Andy Palestini 215-597-1286

Henderson Road, PA (06/30/88)

Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Joe McDowell 215-597-8240

Cabot Carbon/Koppers (Groundwater), FL (09/27/90) Benfield Industries, NC (07/31/92)

Bioremediation (In Situ Groundwater) Soil Washing Bioremediation Slurry phase Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Yes

Patsy Goldberg 404-347-6265 Jon Bornholm 404-347-7791 Geizelle Bennett 404-347-7791 David Lown (NC) 919-733-2801

Charles Macon Lagoon, Lagoon #10, NC (09/31/91)

Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (09/30/87)

Chemical Treatment

Yes

Al Cherry (404) 342-7791 Derek Matory 404-347-7791

Arlington Blending & Packaging Co., Dechlorination OU1, TN (06/28/91)

Yes

Note:

The 6th edition report also adds information on xx innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs. A-9

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
6th Edition Region 5 Site Name, State (ROD Date) South Andover Salvage Yard, OU 2, MN (12/24/91) Technology Listed in 5th Edition Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Added Deleted Yes Changed to Thermal Treatment Technology changed to off-site thermal treatment (either thermal desorption or incineration) because of reduced volume of contamination found during RD investigations. ROD amendment signed 5/31/94. Adding technology to treat more highly contaminated soil. Adding technology to treat more highly contaminated soil. Comments Contacts/Phone Bruce Sypniewski 312-886-6189

Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2, OH (12/28/90) Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2, OH (12/28/90)

Bioremediation (In Situ) Bioremediation (In Situ)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ) (Land Farming) Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Magnetically Enhanced Land Farming Yes

Tom Alcamo 312-886-7278 Tom Alcamo 312-886-7278

United Scrap Lead/SIA, OH (09/30/88)

Soil Washing

Determined to be too expensive. Anita Boseman Other alternatives being evaluated. 312-886-6941 ROD Amendment planned. Timothy Hull (OH) 513-285-6357 Incineration on-site Incineration was contingency Daryl Owens remedy in ROD. State had 312-886-7089 concerns about effective means of soil washing and cost of incineration has decreased; ESD will be signed Fall 1994. Dechlorination not being pursued because of cost considerations. Groundwater remediation not planned for this area. Gregory Fife 214-655-6773 Ron Stirling (USACE) 402-221-7664

MacGillis and Gibbs Co./Bell Soil Washing and Lumber and Pole Co., MN (12/31/92) Bioremediation (ex situ) of fines

Yes

6 6

Fruitland Drum, NM (09/08/90)

Dechlorination Yes

Incineration (Off-site)

Holloman AFB, Main POL Area, NM Bioremediation (In Situ) (Groundwater)

Note:

The 6th edition report also adds information on xx innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs. A-10

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
6th Edition Region 6 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Technology Listed in 5th Edition Added Deleted Yes Changed to Groundwater remediation not planned for this area. Determined there was insignificant concentration to warrant remediation. No further action. Determined that SVE was not viable. No alternative selected at this point. Comments Contacts/Phone Ron Stirling (USACE) 402-221-7664 Bert Gorrod 214-655-6779

Holloman AFB, Main POL Area, NM Air Sparging

South Valley, NM (09/30/88)

Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek Bldg. 3001), OK (08/16/90)

Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Susan Webster 214-655-6784 Major Richard Ashworth (USAF) 405-734-3058

Rocky Mountain Arsenal, M-1 Basins In Situ (OU 16), CO (02/26/90) Vitrification Portland Cement Co. (Kiln Dust No. 2 Chemical Treatment and No. 3) OU2, UT (03/31/92) Mesa Area Ground Water Contamination, AZ (09/27/91) Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Remedy cancelled due to problems Connally Mears with contractor. New ROD being 303-293-1528 negotiated. Not considered innovative Removed from NPL, deferred to the State Mike McCeney 303 293-1526 Maurice Chait 602-962-2187 Richard Oln 602-207-4176

8 9

Yes Yes

Castle Air Force Base, OU 1, CA (09/30/91)

Bioremediation (In Situ Groundwater) Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Pump and Treat Bench-scale test indicated that the David Roberts with Air technology did not work. No ESD 415-744-1487 Stripping or ROD amendment being issued. Brad Hicks (USAF) 209-726-4841 Misintrepretation of the ROD. SVE intended only for Spectra Physics, the adjacent site. Sean Hogan 415-744-2233 Carla Dube 510-286-1041

Teledyne Semi Conductors, CA (03/22/91)

Yes

Note:

The 6th edition report also adds information on xx innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs. A-11

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
6th Edition Region 9 Site Name, State (ROD Date) FMC (Fresno), CA (06/28/91) Technology Listed in 5th Edition Soil Washing Added Deleted Yes Changed to Soil washing did not work because the soil had too many fines. Looking at thermal desorption and solidification/ stabilization as possible remedies. Combined ROD for Signetics, AMD 901/902 and TRW Microwave site. SVE is not being done at the TRW OU. Misinterpretation of ROD. Technology canceled due to cost. Looking at solidification as an alternative. Comments Contacts/Phone Tom Dunkelman 415-744-2287 Mike Pfister (CA) 209-297-3934 Darrin Swartz-Larson 415-744-2233 Kevin Graves (CA) 510-286-0435 Marlin Mezquita 415-744-2393 George Siller (USACE) 916-557-7418 Dan Oburn (Sacramento Army Depot) 916-388-4344 Marie Jennings 206-553-1173

Signetics (Advanced Micro Devices 901), CA (09/11/91)

Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Sacramento Army Depot, Oxidation Lagoons OU, CA (09/30/92)

Soil Washing

Yes

10

McChord AFB Washrack Treatment Area, AK (09/28/92)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Yes

Additional studies showed treatment not needed.

Note:

The 6th edition report also adds information on xx innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs. A-12

TABLE A-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY Table A-1 is the principal part of this chapter. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for remedial sites for which an innovative treatment has been selected. The columns of Table A-1 present the following information: Region This column indicates the EPA Region in which the site is located. Site Name, State, ROD Date This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which an innovative treatment technology was selected. A Record of Decision (ROD) documents the selection of remedy in the remedial program. The date shown in this column is the date on which a ROD was signed by an EPA official. An asterisk (*) in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at the particular site. Specific Technology The second column describes the specific technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment. For example, within the general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase bioremediation may be chosen. Site Description This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the selection of innovative technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may determine the most frequently selected innovative technology for wood preserving sites. Media (quantity) This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ, an effort has been made to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another parameter significant to the application.

9 A-1

TABLE A-1 (Continued) Key Contaminants Treated The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. Other contaminants may also be listed that may be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but that are not to be addressed by the listed technology, are not included. Status This column indicates the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the ROD has been signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially responsible parties, procuring the services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as conducting a treatability study) needed in the design stage. If a project is in design, the engineering documents needed to contract for and build the remedy are being prepared. If a remedy is being installed, the lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed to set up the remedy. The remedy is operational if it is completely installed and it is now being operated as a treatment system; the remedy is completed if the goals of the ROD or decision document for that treatment technology have been met and treatment has ceased. One purpose of this column is to identify opportunities for vendors to become involved in the next phase of the project. Whenever possible, the season and year in which the current phase will end is given. The information is identified as the completion planned date. Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor The lead indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially responsible parties will conduct the remedy with oversight by EPA or the State (PRP lead). If a remedy is Fund lead, EPA may manage the design/construction through its contractors, the state may manage the project with Superfund dollars, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) may act for EPA to manage the design or construction. No matter what agency or organization is responsible for managing the remedy, the contractor responsible for the actual installation and operation of the innovative technology also is identified, if the lead organization has selected a contractor. Contacts/Phone This final column provides the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name listed is usually the EPA remedial project manager (RPM) responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the state, the name and phone number of the state RPM also is provided. Information on other useful contacts may also be provided.

A-2 10

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Iron Horse Park*, MA (09/15/88)

Land treatment

Industrial and railyard waste

Sludge (25,000 cy)

PAHs

Operational; Completion planned Summer 1995 In design; Design completion planned Summer 1995; Remedy being reconsidered; thermal desorption and solvent extraction also being evaluated In design; Design completion planned Summer 1995; Remedy being reconsidered; thermal desorption and solvent extraction also being evaluated

PRP lead/Federal oversight; ENSR Consulting PRP lead/Federal oversight

Don McElroy 617-223-5571

General Motors/Central Foundry Division, OU 1, NY (12/17/90)

Slurry phase

Machine shops, Engine casting facility

Soil (100,000 cy), Sludge (91,000 cy) from lagoon, Sediments (62,000 cy)

PCBs

Lisa Carson 212-264-6857

General Motors/Central Foundry Division, OU 2, NY (03/31/92)

Slurry phase

Aluminum casting plant

Soil (59,000 cy)

PCBs

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Lisa Carson 212-264-6857

A-3

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Whitmoyer Laboratories, OU 3, PA (12/31/90)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Other organic chemical manufacturing

Soil and sediment combined (5,600 cy)

VOCs (TCE), SVOCs (Aniline)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1995 In design; Design completion planned Summer 1998; Treatability study underway Completed; Operational from 1/89 to 7/90

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Environ

Chris Corbett 215-597-8186

Ordnance Works Disposal Areas, WV (09/29/89)

Land treatment

Other organic chemical manufacturing, Other inorganic chemical manufacturing

Soil (13,500 cy)

PAHs (Carcinogenic PAHs)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; ABB Environmental (Design)

Melissa Whittington 215-597-1286

Brown Wood Preserving*, FL (04/08/88)

Land treatment

Wood preserving, Drum storage/ disposal

Soil (8,100 cy)

PAHs (Creosote)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Remediation Technology, Inc. PRP lead/Federal oversight

Ann Marie Gallespie 404-347-6255

Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL (09/27/90) See also Bioremediation (In Situ), Soil Washing

Slurry phase (preceded by soil washing)

Wood preserving, Pine tar and turpentine manufacturing

Soil fines from approximately 6,400 cy

SVOCs (PCP), PAHs

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 Operational; Completion planned December 1994; Operation began 11/93

Patsy Goldberg 404-347-6265

Dubose Oil Products*, FL (03/29/90)

Solid phase Windrowing with aeration and irrigation in a barn

Petroleum refining and reuse

Soil (30,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, DCE, Benzenes, Xylenes), SVOCs (PCP), PAHs

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Wastech

Mark Fite 404-347-6263 George Linder (FL) 904-488-0190

A-4

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

4 Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits (amended ROD)*, FL (06/16/92) See also Soil Washing Slurry phase preceeded by soil washing Waste oil recycler Soil (quantity unknown) Residuals from soil washing VOCs, PCBs, PAHs In design; Remedy being reconsidered; further site characterizatio n underway In design; Operation planned to start Spring 1995 In design; Design completion planned early 1995 Design completed but not installed; will be installed no earlier than Summer 1995 In design; Design completion planned Winter 1994 Federal lead/Fund Financed Tony Best 404-347-6259

Mathis Brothers - South Marble Top Road Landfill, GA (03/24/93)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Landfill operation

Soil (97,700 cy)

VOCs, SVOCs, Biocides

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Engineering Science Federal lead/Fund Financed

Charles King 404-347-6262

Benfield Industries, NC (07/31/92)

Land treatment

Bulk chemical mixing and repackaging plant.

Soil (4,300 cy) fines from soil washing

SVOCs (Creosote)

Jon Bornholm 404-347-7791

Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (06/30/89) See also Soil Washing

Slurry phase; may be followed by s/s

Wood preserving

Soil (2,400 cy); Also fines from soil washing

VOCs, PAHs

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Jon Bornholm 404-347-7791

Helena Chemical, SC (09/08/93) See also Dechlorination

Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Anaerobic and aerobic

Retail sales outlet for agricultural chemicals

Soil quantity unknown

VOCs (Diesel fuel), Biocides (DDT, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Chlordane, Toxaphene)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Ensafe

Bernie Hayes 404-347-7791 Adrian Felder (SC) 803-734-5390

A-5

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

4 Para-Chem Southern, Inc., SC (09/27/93) Slurry phase Manufacturing Plant - products include polymers, latex, coatings, adhesives Sludge(200 cy) VOCs (1,1,1-TCA, DCA, PCE), SVOCs Predesign; Currently conducting a treatability study State lead/Fund Financed; The Fletcher Group (prime), RMT (subcontractor) Terry Tanner 404-347-7791 ext (4117) Mike Klender (SC) 803-734-5471

Galesburg/Koppers, IL (06/30/89)

Land treatment

Wood preserving

Soil (15,200 cy)

SVOCs (PCP, Phenols), PAHs (Creosote)

In design; Design completion planned Spring 1997 In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994; Reconsidering which material will be treated Operational; Completion planned Fall 1994

PRP lead/State oversight; Remediation Technologies, Inc. PRP lead/Federal oversight; ENSR (Design)

Brad Bradley 312-886-4742 Fred Nika (IL) 217-782-6760

Cliffs/Dow Dump*, MI (09/27/89)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Waste disposal for charcoal manufacturing plant

Soil (9,500 cy)

VOCs (TCE, BTEX), SVOCs (Phenol), PAHs (Naphthalene)

Ken Glatz 312-886-1434

Burlington Northern Railroad Tie Treating Plant*, MN (06/04/86)

Land treatment

Wood preserving

Soil (9,500 cy), Sludge(9,500 cy)

SVOCs (Phenols, Creosote), PAHs

PRP lead/State-Fede ral oversight; Remediation Technologies, Inc.

Tony Rutter 312-886-8961 Fred Jenness (MN) 612-297-8470 Richard Truax (RETEC) 303-493-3700

A-6

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

5 Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Co., MN Land treatment Unlined treatment unit with irrigation and tilling Wood preserving Soil (75,000 cy) SVOCs (PCP, PAHs) Operational; Completion planned Fall 1994 PRP lead/State oversight; BARR Engineering/GL Contracting, Inc. Kevin Turner 312-886-4444 Ann Bidwell (MN) 612-296-7827

Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2*, OH (12/28/90) See also Bioremediation (In Situ), Other Technologies

Land treatment

Coke manufacturing

Soil (30,000 cy)

PAHs

In design; Design completion planned early 1995

PRP lead/Federal oversight; IT Corporation (prime contractor, design) PRP lead/Federal oversight; Weston, Inc.(prime contractor)/IT Corporation(sub contractor) Federal lead/Fund Financed

Tom Alcamo 312-886-7278

Moss-American*, WI (09/27/90) See also Soil Washing

Slurry phase preceded by soil washing

Wood preserving

Soil (quantity unknown); fines from soil washing

PAHs

Predesign; PD completion planned 1995; Bench-scale study is underway

Russ Hart 312-886-4844

Popile, AR (02/01/93) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Land treatment

Inactive wood preserving operation

Soil and Sludge combined (156,000 cy)

SVOCs (PAHs, Phenols)

Predesign; RFP for design to be issued Fall 1994

Paul Sieminski 214-655-8503

A-7

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

6 Old Inger Oil Refinery*, LA (09/25/84) Land treatment Petroleum refining and reuse Soil and Sludge combined (120,000 cy) VOCs (Benzene, Ethylbenzene), PAHs (Petroleum hydrocarbons) Operational; Completion planned Fall 2001 State lead/Fund Financed; Westinghouse Haztech (installation), Operation to start Fall 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight Paul Sieminski 214-655-8503 Tom Stafford (LA) 504-765-0487

Pab Oil & Chemical Services, LA (09/22/93)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ) followed by s/s for inorganics

Disposal site for oily drilling mud

Soil (10,900 cy), Sludge (15,500 cy), Sediments (520 cy)

PAHs (Carcinogenic and Non-carcinogenic)

Predesign; Design to begin October 1994; A treatability study will determine the type of bioremediation Predesign

James Van Buskirk 214-665-6767

Prewitt Abandoned Refinery, NM (09/30/92) See also Soil vapor extraction, Other Technologies Oklahoma Refining Co., OK (06/09/92) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Crude oil refinery

Soil (1,500 cy), Sludge (1,200 cy)

VOCs (BTEX), PAHs

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Monica Chapa-Smith 214-655-6780

Bioremediation (Ex Situ) followed by s/s

Petroleum refining and reuse

Soil and sludge combined (56,000 cy), Sediments (quantity unknown)

VOCs, Organics (LNAPLs)

In design; Phase 1 to be completed 4/95; Phase 2 to be completed 5/96

State lead/Fund Financed

Philip Allen 214-665-8516

A-8

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

6 North Cavalcade Street*, TX (06/28/88) Land treatment Wood preserving Soil (5,500 cy) PAHs (Creosote) In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994 State lead/Fund Financed Glenn Celerier 214-655-8523 Stephen Chong (TX) 512-239-2441

Sheridan Disposal Services*, TX (12/29/88)

Slurry phase

Industrial landfill

Soil (13,000 cy) effected soils, Sludge (30,000 cy) of oils and sludge

VOCs (Benzene, Toluene), SVOCs (Phenols), PCBs

Predesign; Pilot study conducted in 1991; Awaiting entry of consent decrees by court to begin design Operational; Completion planned 1997

PRP lead/State oversight

Gary Baumgarten 214-655-6749

Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (09/20/89)

Land treatment using four cells

Paint/ink formation

Soil (40,000 cy)

VOCs (Methyl Ethyl Ketone, BTX)

PRP lead/State oversight; Vogel

Jack Generaux 913-551-7690 Bob Drustrup (IA) 515-281-8900

Broderick Wood Products OU 2, CO (03/24/92) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Land treatment

Wood preserving

Soil (85,000 cy), Sediments (120 cy)

SVOCs (PCP), PAHs

Operational; Operation started August 1994; Completion planned 2001

Federal lead/Fund Financed; CH2M Hill

Armando Saenz 303-293-1532

A-9

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Burlington Northern (Somers Plant)*, MT (09/27/89) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Land treatment; using 12-acre unit

Wood preserving

Soil (54,000 cy) excavated soil

PAHs (Creosote)

Operational; Operation began 9/93; Completion planned 1999 2002 In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 Operational; Completion planned 1999

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Remediation Technologies, Inc. PRP lead/Federal oversight

Jim Harris 406-449-5414 (ext. 260)

Idaho Pole Company*, MT (09/28/92) See also Bioremediation (In Situ), In situ Flushing

Land treatment

Wood preserving

Soil (19,000 cy), Sediments (2,683 cy)

SVOCs (PCP, PAHs)

Jim Harris 406-449-5414 (ext. 260)

Libby Ground Water Contamination*, MT (12/30/88) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Land treatment using two 1-acre cells, soil is excavated & mixed

Wood preserving

Soil (45,000 cy)

VOCs (Benzene), SVOCs (PCP), PAHs (Creosote)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Woodward-Clyd e

Jim Harris 406-449-5414 (ext. 260) Bert Bledsoe (RSKERL) 405-332-2313

Montana Pole and Treating Plant, MT (09/21/93) See also Bioremediation (In Situ), In situ Flushing Wasatch Chemical*, UT (03/29/91) See also In situ Vitrification

Land treatment

Wood preserving

Soil (208,000 cy)

SVOCs (PCP, Dioxins, PAHs)

Predesign; In negotiation

In negotiation

Sara Weinstock 406-782-7415

Land treatment on an asphalt pad

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage, Other organic chemical manufacturing, Other inorganic chemical manufacturing

Soil (1,100 cy)

VOCs (Toluene, Xylene)

Completed; Operational from 10/92 to 12/93

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Harding/Lawson

Bert Garcia 303-293-1537

A-10

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

9 J.H. Baxter*, CA (09/27/90) Land treatment followed by fixation for metals Wood preserving Soil (30,000 cy) SVOCs (PCP, Dioxins, PAHs) In design; Design completion planned Winter 1994 In design; Pilot-scale treatability study planned Spring 1994 Design completed but not installed; Contract awarded; Operation scheduled for mid-Fall 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight Kathy Setian 415-744-2254

Jasco Chemical Co., CA (09/30/92)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ) may combine aerobic and anaerobic

Chemical blending and repacking

Soil (1,095 cy)

VOCs (DCA, Methylene chloride, Acetone, Xylene)

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Rosemarie Carroway 415-744-2235

10

Umatilla Army Depot Activity, Soil Operable Unit*, OR (09/30/92)

Composting

Explosives washout

Soil (7,000 cy)

Explosives (TNT, RDX)

Army lead/EPA and State oversight; Bioremediation Services, Inc.

Harry Craig 503-326-3689 Mark Daugherty (US Army) 503-564-5294 Mike Nelson (USACE Seattle) 206-764-3458

10

Bonneville Power Administration, OU A, WA (05/06/93)

Solid phase

Research and Testing Facility

Soil (500 cy)

PAHs (PCP)

Being installed; Installation completion planned Fall 1994; Operation to be completed by Winter 1994

Federal facility/EPA and State oversight

Nancy Harney 206-553-6635

A-11

Table A-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY TECHNOLOGY THROUGH FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Hocomonco Pond, ESD, MA (09/30/85)

In situ groundwater

Wood preserving

Groundwater

PAHs (Creosote), Organics (DNAPLs)

Being installed; Installation completion planned Fall 1995 Being installed

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Bob Leger 617-573-5734

FAA Technical Center*, NJ (09/26/89) See also Soil vapor extraction

In situ groundwater Pump & treat followed by H2O2 addition and reinjection through infiltration galleries In situ groundwater, in conjunction w/air sparging & nutrient addition In situ soil; Bioventing

Jet fuel tank farm

Groundwater

VOCs (JP-4)

Federal Facility, FAA lead; R.E. Wright

Carla Struble 212-264-4595 Keith Buch (FAA) 609-485-6644

Applied Environmental Services (Groundwater), NY (06/24/91)

Bulk petroleum and hazardous waste storage facility

Groundwater

VOCs (BTEX)

Being installed; Remedial action to start in Fall 1994

PRP lead/State oversight; Remediation Technologies, Inc. PRP lead/State oversight; Remediation Technologies, Inc. (Design)

Mel Haupton 212-264-7681 John Grathwol 518-457-9280

Applied Environmental Services, OU 1, NY (06/24/91) See also Soil vapor extraction, Other Technologies Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (09/30/93) See also Soil vapor extraction

Bulk petroleum and hazardous waste storage facility, fuel blending

Soil (quantity unknown), Groundwater depth to gw avg. 8 feet

VOCs (BTEX), SVOCs (Naphthalene, Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate)

Being installed; Operation to start September 1994

Mel Hauptman 212-264-7681 John Grathwol (NY) 518-457-9280

In situ soil

Landfill site drum disposal area

Soil (14,050 cy)

VOCs (Benzene, TCE, PCE, Methylene Chloride)

Predesign; In negotiation

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Eric Newman 215-597-0910

A-12

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

4 Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL (09/27/90) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ), Soil Washing In situ soil; Treating above/below gw table by nutrient addition Wood preserving, Pine tar and turpentine manufacturing Soil (5,000 cy) SVOCs (PCP), PAHs In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight; McLaren-Hart (Design contractor) Federal lead/Fund Financed Patsy Goldberg 404-347-6265

Peak Oil/Bay Drums OU 1, FL (06/21/93) See also In situ Flushing

In situ soil

Waste oil re-refinery

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (PCE, Ethylbenzene), SVOCs (PAHs), PCBs VOCs (TCA, Carbon Tetrachloride, TCE)

Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994 Completed; Operational from 1/87 to 6/90

David Abbot 404-257-2643

Seymour Recycling, IN (09/30/87) See also Soil vapor extraction

In situ soil Nutrients plowed into soil

Chemical waste management and incineration

Soil (190,000 cy) 12 acres to a depth of 10 feet

PRP lead/Federal oversight; ABB Environmental Services PRP lead/Federal oversight; Geraghty Miller

Jeff Gore 312-886-6552

Seymour Recycling (Groundwater), IN (09/30/87)

In situ groundwater; Gw treatment incidental to soil treatment

Chemical waste management and incineration

Groundwater under 12 acres

VOCs, SVOCs, PAHs

Operational; Gw treatment was not designed but appears to be occuring as a result of in situ soil treatment

Jeff Gore 312-886-6552

A-13

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

5 Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2*, OH (12/28/90) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ), Other Technologies Bioremediation (In Situ) of lagoon sediments Coke manufacturing Sediments (457,000 cy) from a lagoon PAHs In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994; Operation planned to begin Spring 1995 In design; Design completion planned Spring 1995 Operational; Completion sometime between 1996 and 2000. PRP lead/Federal oversight; IT Corporation (prime contractor), Black & Veetch (subcontractor) Tom Alcamo 312-886-7278

Hagen Farm Site, Groundwater Control OU, WI (09/30/92)

In situ groundwater

Industrial landfill, Municipal landfill

Groundwater

VOCs (Vinyl Chloride, MEK, Xylene)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Warzyn (prime contractor) Federal lead/Fund Financed; CH2M Hill (prime contractor) Federal lead/Fund Financed

Steve Padovani 312-353-6755

Onalaska Municipal Landfill*, WI (08/14/90)

In situ soil; air injection but no nutrient or microbe addition

Municipal landfill

Soil (16,000 cy) to a depth 11 -15 feet

PAHs (Naphthalene)

Kevin Adler 312-886-7078

Popile, AR (02/01/93) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

In situ groundwater

Inactive wood preserving operation

Groundwater

NAPLS

Predesign; RFP for design to be issued Fall 1994 Design completed but not installed; Completion planned Fall 1994

Paul Sieminski 214-655-8503

American Creosote Works, Inc. (Winnfield Plant), LA (04/28/93)

In situ soil

Wood preserving

Soil (250,000 cy)

SVOCs (PCP, Creosote), PAHs

Federal lead/Fund Financed; CDM Federal Programs (design contractor)

Bert Griswold 214-655-8502

A-14

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

6 Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis, NM (09/23/88) In situ soil Railyard wastes (diesel spills) Soil (28,600 cy), Sludge combined, 6 feet deep PAHs (petroleum hydrocarbons, diesel fuel) Operational; Completion planned end of 1996; Operation began 6/92 In design; Phase 1 to be completed 4/95; Phase 2 to be completed 5/96 Completed; Operational 1/92 - 12/93 Design completed but not installed; pilot study underway; decision to expand the system will be made in Fall 1994 Predesign PRP lead/Federal oversight; Radian Corporation Ky Nichols 214-665-6783

Oklahoma Refining Co., OK (06/09/92) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

In situ soil

Petroleum refining and reuse

Soil (43,300 cy)

VOCs, Organics (LNAPLs)

State lead/Fund Financed

Phillip Allen 214-665-8516

French Limited, TX (03/24/88)

Bioremediation (In Situ) In Situ Lagoon In situ soil; injection of nutrients and oxygenated water to treat both saturated and unsaturated soil

Petrochemical

Soil and Sludge combined (300,000 cy) Soil (18,500 cy)

VOCs, PAHs

PRP lead/Federal oversight PRP lead/Federal oversight; BARR Engineering

Judith Black 214-655-6735

People's Natural Gas, IA (09/16/91)

Coal gasification

VOCs (BTEX), PAHs

Bill Bunn 913-551-7792

Pester Refinery Co., KS (09/30/92) See also In situ Flushing

In situ soil preceeded by in situ soil flushing

Refinery operation

Soil (70,000 cy)

PAHs (Benzo(a)anthrace ne, Chrysene)

PRP lead/State oversight

Cathy Barret 913-551-7704 Rachel Miller 913-296-1676

A-15

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

8 Broderick Wood Products OU 2, CO (03/24/92) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ) In situ soil and in situ gw bioventing of soil & aquifer; solids following free product recovery and dewatering In situ groundwater Carbon treatment aboveground; treatment followed by nutrient and pure oxygen addition prior to reinjection In situ groundwater; injection of oxygen and nutrients In situ groundwater; Injection of H2O2 and Potassium tripolyphosphate Wood preserving Soil 20 acres; 10 feet to rock SVOCs (PCP), PAHs In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 Federal lead/Fund Financed; CH2M (prime contractor) Armando Saenz 303-293-1532

Burlington Northern (Somers Plant)*, MT (09/27/89) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Wood preserving

Groundwater 2 areas, 20 ft deep and 30 ft deep

SVOCs (Phenols), PAHs (Creosote)

Operational; Operational since May 1994; completion date unknown

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Remediation Technologies, Inc.

Jim Harris 406-449-5414 (ext. 260)

Idaho Pole Company*, MT (09/28/92) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ), In situ Flushing Libby Groundwater Contamination*, MT (12/30/88) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Wood preserving

Groundwater down to 30 feet deep

SVOCs (PCP, PAHs)

Predesign

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Jim Harris 406-449-5414 (ext. 260)

Wood preserving

Groundwater (40 80 ft deep)

VOCs (Benzene), SVOCs (PCP), PAHs (Creosote)

Operational; Completion planned 2001; Operation began in Spetember 1991

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Woodward-Clyd e

Jim Harris 406-449-5414 (ext. 260) Bert Bledsoe (RSKERL) 405-332-2313

A-16

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

8 Montana Pole and Treating Plant, MT (09/21/93) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ), In situ Flushing 8 Montana Pole and Treating Plant (Groundwater), MT (09/21/93) Williams AFB, (OU2), AZ (12/30/92) See also Soil vapor extraction In situ soil Wood preserving Soil (44,000 cy) SVOCs (PCP, Dioxins, PAHs) Predesign; In negotiation In negotiation Sara Weinstock 406-782-7415

In situ groundwater

Wood preserving

Groundwater

SVOCs (PCP, Dioxins, PAHs)

Predesign; In negotiation

In negotiation

Sara Weinstock 406-782-7415

Bioremediation In Situ; Bioventing

AFB, Flight Training Base

Soil (54,000 cy) down to 25 feet deep

VOCs (Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-DCA, Methylene Chloride), PAHs (TPH) VOCs (PCE, Acetone, MEK, Benzene)

Being installed; Full-scale operation to start 1/95

USAF - IRP/ EPA and State Oversight; Earth Technologies

R. Mendoza 415-744-2407 William Harris (USAF) 602-988-6486

Hexcel, CA (09/21/93) See also Soil vapor extraction, Other Technologies Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville Plant), CA (04/04/90) See also Soil Washing

In situ soil

Manufacturing

Soil (quantity unknown), Groundwater

Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994 Design completed but not installed; installation postponed until completion of removal action

PRP lead/State oversight

Mark Johnson 510-286-0305

In situ soil

Wood preserving

Soil (110,000 cy) to a depth of 10 ft

SVOCs (PCPs), PAHs

PRP lead/Federal oversight; SBP Technologies

Fred Schauffler 415-744-2359

A-17

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

10 Eielson Air Force Base*, AK (09/29/92) See also Soil vapor extraction In situ soil; Bioventing Tactical air support installation Airplane fueling and maintenance Soil (quantity unknown) down to 10 ft deep VOCs (JP-4), SVOCs, PAHs (Petroleum Hydrocarbons, Diesel) Operational Federal Facility/EPA and State oversight; DERA; EA Engineering (Design) Mary Jane Nearman 206-553-6642 Rielle Markey (AK) 907-451-2117 Capt. Max Gandy (Eielson AFB) 907-377-4361

10

Fairchild AFB, Priority 1 OU's (OU 2) FT-1, WA (07/14/93) See also Other Technologies

Bioremediation; In Situ Bioventing

Fire training area

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (Benzene)

In design; Pilot test starting 5/94

USAF/Federal oversight; E.S. Inc.

Cami Grandinetti 206-553-8696

A-18

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Chemical Treatment
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

JFD Electronics/Channel Master, NC (09/10/92)

Oxidation of cyanides followed by on-site s/s for metals

Solvent recovery

Soil and Sludge combined, (3,000 cy)

Inorganic cyanides

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1995

PRP lead/Federal oversight

McKenzie Mallary 404-347-7791

A-19

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Dechlorination
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Myers Property, NJ (09/28/90) See also Soil Washing

Dechlorination

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage

Soil (48,000 cy), Sediments (500 cy)

SVOCs (Chlorobenzene), Biocides (DDT, DDE, DDD), Dioxins

In design; Design completion planned Spring 1996; Design concurrent with treatability studies Completed; Operational from 9/90 to 9/91

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Metcalf & Eddy

John Prince 212-264-1213

Wide Beach Development, NY (09/30/85)

Dechlorination with APEG using an anaerobic thermal process unit

Contaminated road dust, driveways, ditches

Soil (40,000 cy)

PCBs

Federal lead/Fund Financed; SoilTech Inc. (subonctractor to Kimmins) Federal lead/Fund Financed

Herb King 212-264-1129

Saunders Supply Co, OU 1, VA (09/30/91) See also Thermal Desorption

Dechlorination

Wood preserving

Sludge (700 cy) KOO1 RCRA waste from a lagoon

SVOCs (PCP), Dioxins

In design; Design completion planned Spring 1995 Operational; Operation began in April 1994; completion planned October 1994

Andy Palestini 215-597-1286

Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1*, KY (09/30/91) See also Thermal Desorption

Dechlorination (part of anaerobic thermal treatment)

Drum storage/ disposal

Soil (18,500 cy)

PCBs

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie (prime contractor), SoilTech (subcontractor)

Tony DeAngelo 404-347-7791

A-20

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

4 Helena Chemical, SC (09/08/93) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Dechlorination Retail sales outlet for agricultural chemicals Soil (quantity unknown) VOCs (Diesel fuel), Biocides (DDT, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Chlordane, Toxaphene) In design; Design completion planned Winter 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Ensafe Bernie Hayes 404-347-7791 Adrian Felder (SC) 803-734-5390

A-21

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 In situ Flushing
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Lipari Landfill (OU 2)*, NJ (09/30/85)

Soil flushing Flushing of area within the slurry wall, including soil and wastes.

Industrial landfill, Municipal landfill

Soil (650,000 cy) 16 acres to a depth of 15 feet

VOCs (Bis-2-chloroethyl ether, DCA, Dichloromethane), SVOCs (Phenol), Metals (Chromium, Lead, Nickel, Mercury) Metals (Arsenic)

Operational; Completion planned 1999

Federal lead/Fund Financed; AWD, Inc.

Fred Cataneo 212-264-9542

Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2, NJ (09/29/89) See also Soil Washing

Soil flushing Flushing lagoons using treated gw

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage

Soil (126,000 cy) to a depth of 15 feet in sandy soil

In design; Design completion planned Winter 1995

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Malcolm Pirnie (Design)

Matthew Westgate 212-264-3406 Steve Hadel (USACE-Kansa s City) 816-426-5221

Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (09/29/89)

Soil flushing

Drum storage/ disposal

Soil (5,200 cy), Groundwater

VOCs (TCE, DCE, TCA, Methyl Ethyl Ketone), Metals (Chromium, Lead) SVOCs (Naphthalene)

Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994 In design; Negotiation with PRP is going on for new design.

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Eduardo Gonzales 212-264-5714

Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc., NY (02/24/92) See also Soil vapor extraction

Soil flushing

Tank farm and chemical distribution facility

Soil (13,000 cy) down to 30 feet deep

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Ebasco (design)

Sherrel Henry 212-264-8675

A-22

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 In situ Flushing (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

4 Ciba-Geigy (MacIntosh Plant) OU 2, AL (09/30/91) See also Thermal Desorption Soil flushing Agriculture applications, Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage, Other organic chemical manufacturing Soil (quantity unknown) VOCs (Benzene, Chloroform, Toluene), Biocides (DDD, DDT, DDE, BHCs, Diazinon, Chlorobenzilate), Metals (Lead) Predesign; PD completion planned Winter 1995; Treatability studies ongoing; final decision on technology will be made late 1994 Predesign; Treatability studies ongoing; final decision on technologies will be made late 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight; CDM/FPC (Demolition/Desi gn contractors) Charles King 404-347-6262

Ciba-Geigy (MacIntosh Plant) OU 4, AL (07/14/92) See also Thermal Desorption

Soil flushing

Agriculture applications, Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage, Other organic chemical manufacturing

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (Chloroform, Toluene, Xylenes), Biocides (Atrazine, Diazinon, Prometryn, Simazine), Metals (Copper, Lead, Arsenic, Chromium, Iron slurry) VOCs (PCE, Ethylbenzene), SVOCs (PAHs), Metals (Lead, Zinc, Chromium)

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Charles King 404-347-6262

Peak Oil/Bay Drums OU 1, FL (06/21/93) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil flushing

Waste oil re-refinery

Soil (quantity unknown)

Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994

Federal lead/Fund Financed

David Abbot 404-347-2643

A-23

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 In situ Flushing (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

4 JADCO-Hughes, NC (09/27/90) See also Soil vapor extraction Soil flushing Preceded by vacuum extraction using the same horizontal wells Plastics manufacturing, Other organic chemical manufacturing, Other inorganic chemical manufacturing, Drum storage/ disposal, Municipal water supply Industrial landfill Soil (6,000 cy) VOCs (TCE, Vinyl Chloride,Carbon Tetrachloride,Chlo rofor, BTX), SVOCs (Dichlorobenzene, Trichlorobenzene) In design; Design completion planned December 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Conestoga-Rov ers & Associates (prime contractor) Michael Townsend 404-347-7791 Bruce Nicholson (NC) 919-733-2801

Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (06/30/89)

In situ Flushing of area inside slurry wall

Soil (64,000 cy), Groundwater

VOCs (TCE, BTEX)

Completed

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Fluor-Daniel PRP lead/Federal oversight; Woodward Clyde (prime contractor) PRP lead/Federal oversight; ENSR (RD/RA contractor)

Bernard Schorle 312-886-4746

Rasmussen Dump, MI (03/28/91)

Soil flushing (flushing part of recycle of treated gw)

Industrial landfill, Paint/ink formation

Soil seepage (basin size unknown)

VOCs (Vinyl Chloride, Benzene)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994

Ken Glatz 312-886-1434

Koppers/Texarkana*, TX (09/23/88) See also Soil Washing

Soil flushing with reinjection of treated water to 1 ft below surface

Wood preserving

Soil (19,400 cy) below 1 ft, treated by reinjected water

PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Creosote), Metals (Arsenic)

In design

Ursula Lennox 214-655-6743

A-24

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 In situ Flushing (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

South Cavalcade Street*, TX (09/26/88) See also Soil Washing

Soil flushing with the same surfactants used for the soils treated with soil washing Soil flushing followed by in situ bioremediation

Wood preserving

Soil (20,000 cy)

PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(a)anthrace ne, Chrysene)

Predesign; Technology on hold pending remediation of groundwater

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Glenn Celerier 214-655-8523

Pester Refinery Co., KS (09/30/92) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Refinery operation

Soil (70,000 cy), Sludge (30,000 cy)

PAHs (Benzo(a)anthrace ne, Chrysene)

Predesign

PRP lead/State oversight

Cathy Barrett 913-551-7704 Marvin Glotzbach (KS) 913-296-2783

Lee Chemical, MO (03/21/91)

Soil flushing with 3 infiltration galleries; 10 ft x 50 ft each

Solvent recovery

Soil (30,000 cy) 20 ft to gw

VOCs (TCE)

Operational; Completion planned 1999; Operation began 5/94

PRP lead/State oversight; (no treatment contractor)

Steven Kinser 913-551-7728 Ron Redden (MO) 314-751-8393

Idaho Pole Company*, MT (09/28/92) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ), Bioremediation (In Situ) Montana Pole and Treating Plant, MT (09/21/93) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ), Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil flushing

Wood preserving

Soil (6,500 cy)

SVOCs (PCP, PAHs)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 Predesign; In negotiation

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Jim Harris 406-449-5414 (ext. 260)

Soil flushing

Wood preserving

Soil (44,000 cy)

SVOCs (PCP), Dioxins, PAHs

In negotiation

Sara Weinstock 406-782-7415

A-25

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 In situ Flushing (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

10 Union Pacific Railroad Sludge Pit, ID (09/10/91) Soil flushing Railroad operations, cleaning and fueling Soil (quantity unknown) VOCs (PCE,TCE), PAHs (Petroleum hydrocarbons), Metals (Arsenic,Cadmium ) Metals (Chromium VI) Predesign; Remedy being reconsidered PRP lead/Federal oversight Ann Williamson 206-553-2739 Clyde Cody (ID) 208-334-0556

10

United Chrome Products*, OR (09/12/86)

Soil flushing

Chrome plating facility

Soil (quantity unknown)

Operational; Operations began during Summer 1988 and will continue until GW standard is met.

PRP lead/Federal oversight; CH2MHill & subcontractors

Alan Goodman 503-326-3685

A-26

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 In situ Vitrification
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Ionia City Landfill*, MI (09/29/89)

In situ Vitrification

Municipal landfill

Soil (5,000 cy) with debris, to a depth of 15 feet

VOCs (Methylene Chloride, TCA, Styrene, Toluene), Metals (Lead)

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1995 Design completed but not installed; Installation planned Fall 1994: Project completion planned Spring 1995; awaiting vendor availability

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Geosafe

Michael Gifford 312-886-7257

Wasatch Chemical*, UT (03/29/91) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

In situ Vitrification consolidation of soil & waste in pond prior to treatment

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage, Other organic chemical manufacturing, Other inorganic chemical manufacturing

Soil, sludge, and solids combined to 5 feet deep (1,500 cy)

VOCs, SVOCs (Hexachlorobenzene, PCP), Biocides, Dioxins

PRP lead/Federal oversight; GeoSafe

Bert Garcia 303-293-1537

A-27

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (09/29/89)

Soil vapor extraction

Solvent recovery, Industrial complex, illegal dumping of solvent was

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (TCE, PCE, DCE, TCA, DCA, Vinyl Chloride)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 Predesign

PRP lead/Federal oversight; GZA Geoenvironmental (Design) Federal lead/Fund Financed PRP lead/Federal oversight; Terra Vac

Leslie McVickar 617-573-9689

Linemaster Switch Corporation, CT (07/21/93) Groveland Wells*, MA (09/30/88)

Soil vapor extraction

Electrical power switches manu. facility Manufacturing

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (TCE)

Elise Jakabhazy 617-573-5760

Soil vapor extraction (carbon absorption for air emissions) Soil vapor extraction

Soil (19,000 cy) to a depth of 25-30 feet

VOCs (TCE, Methylene Chloride, DCE)

Operational

Bob Leger 617-573-5734

Silresim, MA (09/19/91)

Chemical waste reclamation

Soil (137,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, TCA, Carbon Tetrachloride, Chloroform, Styrene) VOCs (PCE, TCE)

Being installed; Installation completion planned Winter 1994 Operational; OU 1 consists of 5 properties, the technolgy has become operational on some of the properties.

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Mark Otis 617-573-5797

Wells G&H OU 1, MA (09/14/89)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

Drum storage/ disposal, Leaking UST and midnight dumping

Soil (7,400 cy) to a depth of 3 feet

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Several contractors working on the site

Mary Garren 617-573-9613 Paula Fitzsimmons (MA) 617-223-5572

A-28

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

1 Union Chemical Co., OU 1, ME (12/27/90) Soil vapor extraction Solvent recovery, Paint stripping Soil (10,000 cy) VOCs (TCE,DCE,PCE,X ylene) In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Balsam Environmental/ VAPEX Terrance Connelly 617-573-9638 Christopher Rushton (ME) 207-287-2651

Mottolo Pig Farm, NH (03/29/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Uncontrolled waste site

Soil (3,400 cy)

VOCs (TCE, TCA, Vinyl Chloride, DCA, DCE, Toluene, Ethylbenzene)

Operational; Completion planned Spring 1995; Operation started October 1993

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Metcalf & Eddy (prime contractor) OH Materials (subcontractor) PRP lead/Federal oversight

Roger Duwart 617-573-9628 Joe Donovan (NH) 603-271-2911

South Municipal Water Supply Well*, NH (09/27/89) See also Other Technologies

Soil vapor extraction ; Air sparging of gw

Ball bearing manufacturing

Soil (7,500 cy), Groundwater

VOCs (PCE, TCA, TCE)

Installed but not operational; Operation begins October 1994: Completion planned 2011 Predesign

Roger Duwart 617-573-9628 Tom Andrews (NH) 603-271-2910

Tibbetts Road*, NH (09/29/92)

Soil vapor extraction

Illegal dumping site, primarily painting wastes and solvents

Soil (50,000 cy) down to 20 feet

VOCs (PCE, TCE)

In negotiation

Darryl Luce 617-573-5767 Tom Andrew (NH) 603-271-2010

A-29

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

1 Tinkham Garage (OU 1)*, NH (09/30/86) Soil vapor extraction (carbon absorption for air emissions) Soil vapor extraction Illegal dumping site Soil (9,000 cy) VOCs (TCE, Chloroform, DCE, Vinyl chloride, Benzene) In design; Operation scheduled to begin summer 1994 Predesign; EPA negotiating with PRP PRP lead/Federal oversight; Terra Vac Jim DiLorenzo 617-223-5510

Peterson/Puritan Inc. (OU 1), RI (09/30/93) See also Other Technologies

Custom manufacturing facility Industrial and commercial area

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (1,1,1 TCA, PCE, TCE)

State lead/Fund Financed

Dave Newton 617-573-9612 Leo Hellested (RI) 401-277-2797

Picillo Farm Site, RI (09/27/93)

Soil vapor extraction

Disposal area

Soil (131,000 cy)

VOCs, SVOCs, Biocides, PCBs

Predesign; EPA negotiating with PRP Predesign; PD completion planned January 1995

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Anna Krasko 617-573-5749

Stamina Mills, RI (09/28/90)

Soil vapor extraction

Textile manufacturing

Soil (6,000 cy) to a depth of 12 feet

VOCs (DCE, TCE)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Environmental & Safety Design Inc. PRP lead/Federal oversight; Harding-Lawson

Neil Handler 617-573-9636 Mark Dennen (RI) 401-277-2797

A O Polymer, Soil treatment phase, NJ (06/28/91)

Soil vapor extraction (carbon adsorption for air emissions)

Polymer manufacturing

Soil (7,500 cy) to a depth of 30 feet

VOCs (TCE, TCA, Trichlorofluoromet hane, Toluene, Ethylbenzene), SVOCs (Naphthalene, 4-methylphenol)

In design; Remedial construction will be completed Fall 1994

Rich Puvogel 212-264-9836

A-30

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

2 FAA Technical Center*, NJ (09/26/89) See also Bioremediation (In Situ) Soil vapor extraction Jet fuel tank farm Soil (33,000 cy) VOCs (BTEX), SVOCs (Chlorophenol, Phenol) Being installed; Operation scheduled 1/95; completion scheduled for 2000 or later Operational; Operation began in June 1994 In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 In design; Design completion planned Winter 1995 In design; Design completion planned Spring 1995 Federal Facility, FAA lead; R.E. Wright (prime contractor) Carla Struble 212-264-4595 Keith Buch (FAA) 609-485-6644

Garden State Cleaners, NJ (09/26/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Dry cleaners

Soil (300 cy) 25 ft deep; 3 feet by 10 feet

VOCs (PCE)

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Sharon Atkinson 212-264-1217

Naval Air Engineering Center, OU 23, NJ (09/27/93)

Soil vapor extraction

Fuel storage farm

Soil (3,500 cy)

VOCs, PAHs (TPH, Naphthalene)

Federal Facility/ Federal Oversight

Jeff Gratz 212-264-6667

South Jersey Clothing, NJ (09/26/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Dry cleaners, Clothing manufacturer

Soil (1,400 cy) to a depth of 25 feet

VOCs (TCE)

Federal lead/Fund Financed; USACE (design)

Sharon Atkinson 212-264-1217

Swope Oil & Chem Co., OU 2, NJ (09/27/91)

Soil vapor extraction Vacuum extraction.Bioven ting (Not planned yet)

Chemical reclamation

Soil (253,000 cy) 2 acres, to a depth of 80 feet

VOCs (TCE, PCE, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Geraghty & Miller (design)

Joseph Gowers 212-264-5386

A-31

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

2 Applied Environmental Services, OU 1, NY (06/24/91) See also Bioremediation (In Situ), Other Technologies Soil vapor extraction with air flushing with air sparging; area will be covered Bulk petroleum and hazardous waste storage facility, fuel blending Soil depth to gw averages 8 ft VOCs (BTEX) Design completed but not installed; Design completed in 3/94; construction to start in Summer of 1994 In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 PRP lead/State oversight; Remediation Technologies, Inc. Mel Hauptman 212-264-7681 John Grathwol (NY) 518-457-9280

Circuitron Corporation, OU 1, NY (03/29/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Electroplating

Soil (900 cy) to a depth of 30 ft

VOCs (TCA, PCE, TCE, DCA)

Federal lead/Fund Financed; ICF (design contractor) Federal lead/Fund Financed; Ebasco

Miko Fayon 212-264-4706

Genzale Plating Company, OU 1, NY (03/29/91)

Soil vapor extraction precedes excavation for off-site solidification Soil vapor extraction

Electroplating

Soil (275 cy) to a depth of 30 ft

VOCs (TCE, TCA)

Miko Fayon 212-264-4706

Mattiace Petrochemicals Company, OU 1, NY (06/27/91)

Organic chemicals blending

Soil (17,000 cy) to a depth of 40 feet

VOCs (PCE, TCE,, Benzene, Xylene)

Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994 In design; Negotiation with PRP is going on for new design.

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Edward Als 212-264-0522

Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc., NY (02/24/92) See also In situ Flushing

Soil vapor extraction

Tank farm and chemical distribution facility

Soil (13,000 cy) down to 30 feet deep

VOCs (TCE, PCE, Benzene)

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Ebasco (design contractor)

Sherrel Henry 212-264-8675 Jim Bologna (NY) 518-459-3976

A-32

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

2 SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY (09/29/89) Soil vapor extraction with catalytic combustor for vapors Soil vapor extraction Military aircraft component overhauler Soil (1,250 cy) to a depth of 25 feet VOCs (TCE, Dichlorobenzene) Completed; Operational from 4/92 to 12/93 Federal lead/Fund Financed; Four Seasons Miko Fayon 212-264-4706

Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY (09/27/90)

Industrial park

Soil (25,000 cy) Both areas = 25,000 cy, to 28 ft depth

VOCs (DCA, TCA, TCE, DCE)

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994 Being installed; Installation completion planned Fall 1994 Completed; Operational 1/83 - 3/88

Area 2 - Fund lead; Area 4 PRP lead S.V.E

Ed Als 212-264-0522

Janssen Inc., PR (09/30/93)

Soil vapor extraction

Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (Chloroform)

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Adalberto Bosque 809-729-6951

Upjohn Manufacturing Co., PR (09/30/88)

Soil vapor extraction

Industrial facility, chemical leak

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (Carbon Tetrachloride, Acetonitrile)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Terra Vac PRP lead/Federal oversight

Alison Hess 212-264-6040

Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (09/30/93) See also Bioremediation (In Situ) Bendix, PA (09/30/88)

Soil vapor extraction

Landfill site drum disposal area

Soil (50,000 cy)

VOCs (Benzene, TCE, PCE, Methylene Chloride) VOCs (PCE, TCE, Vinyl Chloride)

Predesign; In negotiaton

Eric Newman 215-597-0910

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

Aircraft instrumentation manufacturing

Soil (33,000 cy) to a depth fo 10 feet

Predesign; Treatability study completed and being reviewed

PRP lead/Federal oversight; ERM, Inc.

Jim Harper 215-597-6906

A-33

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

3 Cryochem, OU 3, PA (09/30/91) Soil vapor extraction Machine shops, Metal fabrication Soil (70 cy) up to 4 ft deep VOCs (TCA, TCE, PCE, DCA, DCE) In design; Design completion planned Summer 1995 Design completed but not installed Federal lead/Fund Financed; CH2M Hill Joe McDowell 215-597-8240

Lord-Shope Landfill*, PA (06/29/90)

Soil vapor extraction (method to be determined in design) Soil vapor extraction

Industrial landfill

Soil (270,000 cy) to a depth of 30 feet

VOCs (PCE, TCE, Vinyl Chloride, Alcohols, n-butanol), SVOCs (Ketones) VOCs (TCE, PCE, 1,2-DCE)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Eckenfelder

Dave Turner 215-597-3218

Raymark*, PA (12/30/91)

Multi-source metal fabrication facility

Soil (quantity unknown), Solids bedrock Soil (quantity unknown)

Operational; since May 1994 In design; Design completion planned Fall 1995 Operational; since 11/88; completion date unknown

Federal lead/Fund Financed PRP lead/Federal oversight

Harry Harbold 215-597-1101

Saegertown Industrial Area Site, PA (01/29/93) See also Other Technologies

Soil vapor extraction

Industrial park (Lord Corp. property)

VOCs (TCE, TCA)

Steve Donohue 215-597-3166 Bob Kimball 814-332-6075

Tyson's Dump*, PA (03/31/88)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing (The system has been modified during operations) Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

Abandoned septic and chemical waste disposal site

Soil (30,000 cy) with some DNAPL,to a depth of 30 feet

VOCs (Benzene, Toluene, Xylene), SVOCs (Trichloropropane)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Terra Vac

Eugene Dennis 215-597-3153

Arrowhead Associates/Scovill, OU 1, VA (09/30/91)

Electroplating

Soil (1,000 cy) depth unknown

VOCs (TCE, PCE)

Predesign; In negotiation with PRP

PRP lead/Federal oversight; ICF Kaiser

Ron Davis 215-597-1727

A-34

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

3 Defense General Supply Center, OU 5*, VA (03/25/92) Soil vapor extraction (one extraction well) Cleaning and repainting of combat helmets and gas cylinders Soil (1,000 cy) VOCs (PCE, TCE) Completed; Consisted of pilot study 12/1/92-12/11/ 92; after which soil samples showed no further contamination Completed; Operational from 1/91 to 7/91 Predesign; PD completion planned Summer 1994 Federal Facility DLA Lead/Federal oversight; Engineering-Sci ence Jack Potosnak 215-597-2317 Bill Sadington (DGSC) 804-279-3781

Hollingsworth Solderless, FL (04/10/86)

Soil vapor extraction

Electroplating

Soil (60 cy)

VOCs (TCE, Vinyl chloride)

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Ebasco Federal Facility, USAF Lead/Federal Oves

John Zimmerman 404-347-2643

Robins AFB, Landfill and Sludge Lagoon, OU 1, GA (06/28/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Federal facility, sludge from an industrial waste water treatment plant Petroleum refining and reuse, Drum storage/disposal, Waste oil recycler

Soil (15,000 cy) combined, to a depth of 8 feet, Sludge (quantity unknown) Soil (1,300 cy) combined

VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl Chloride, Carbon Tetrachloride)

Liz Wilde 404-347-3016

Charles Macon Lagoon, Lagoon #7, OU 1, NC (09/30/91)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

VOCs (PCE)

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994

PRP lead/Federal oversight; RMT

Giezelle Bennett 404-347-7791 David Lown (NC) 919-733-2801

A-35

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

4 JADCO-Hughes, NC (09/27/90) See also In situ Flushing Soil vapor extraction with horizontal wells Followed by in situ flushing with same ports Plastics manufacturing, Other organic chemical manufacturing, Other inorganic chemical manufacturing, Drum storage/ disposal, Municipal water supply Drum storage/ disposal Soil (6,000 cy) VOCs (Carbon tetrachloride, Chloroform, Vinyl chloride, BTX), SVOCs (Dichlorobenzene, Trichlorobenzene) In design; Design completion planned December 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Conestoga-Rov ers & Associates (prime contractors) Micheal Townsend 404-347-7791 Bruce Nicholson (NC) 919-733-2801

USMC Camp Lejeune Military Base, OU 2, NC (09/24/93)

Soil vapor extraction

Soil (16,500 cy)

VOCs (DCE, PCE, TCA, Vinyl Chloride)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 Design completed but not installed; Installation completion planned for January 1995 In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994

USMC Lead/Federal Oversight

Gena Townsend 404-347-3016

Medley Farm, OU 1, SC (05/29/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Other organic chemical manufacturing, Rubber manufacturing, Drum storage/ disposal Drum storage/ disposal, Solvent recovery

Soil (50,000 cy) maximum depth 60ft

VOCs (DCA, DCE, TCA, TCE, PCE, Methylene Chloride), SVOCs (Phthalates)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; RMT, Inc.

Ralph Howard 404-347-7791 Richard Haynes (SC) 803-734-5487

SCRDI Bluff Road, SC (09/12/90)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

Soil (45,000 cy) to a depth of 12 feet

VOCs (TCA, TCE, PCA, PCE, DCA, DCE, MEK, Chlorobenzene, BTEX)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; ERM DeMaximus to organize all PRPs contractors

Steve Sandler 404-347-7791

A-36

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

4 Carrier Air Conditioning*, TN (09/03/92) Soil vapor extraction with air flushing Manufacturer of heating and air conditioning units Soil (76,500 cy) VOCs (TCE) Design completed but not installed; Designcompletion planned Fall 1994 In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994 Predesign; Schedule pending completion of negotiation PRP lead/Federal oversight; Environmental Safety & Designs, Inc. Beth Brown 404-347-7791

Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. OU 3 & OU 6, IL (12/31/90) See also Thermal Desorption American Chemical Services*, IN (09/30/92) See also Thermal Desorption

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing for OU 6

Industrial landfill, Municipal water supply

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (DCA, TCA, DCE, TCE, PCE, Vinyl Chloride, Benzene)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Harding/Lawson

Deborah Orr 312-886-7576

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing bioenhancement for SVOCs;air flushing w/vertica wells Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

Other organic chemical manufacturing, Solvent recovery

Soil (100,000 cy) 15 to 20 ft deep

VOCs, PCBs

In negotiation

Bill Bolen 312-353-6316

Enviro. Conservation and Chemical (ROD Amendment), IN (06/07/91)

Chemical recycler (solvents)

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene), SVOCs (Dichlorobenzene, Phenol), Organics (BNAs) VOCs (PCE, DCA, TCA)

In design; Design completion planned for Fall 1995

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Karen Vendl 312-886-4739

Fisher Calo Chem, IN (08/07/90)

Soil vapor extraction

Municipal water supply

Soil (29,500 cy)

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1995

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Connestoga Rovers - Prime

Jeff Gore 312-886-6552

A-37

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

5 MIDCO I, IN (06/30/89) Soil vapor extraction Industrial landfill Soil (10,000 cy) to a depth of 4 - 8 feet VOCs (TCE, Dichloromethane, Chlorobenzene, 2-Butanone, BTX), SVOCs (Phenols), PAHs Predesign; PD completion planned Winter 1994; Implementatio n planned for 1996 Predesign; PD completion planned Winter 1996; Bench-scale treatability study is underway In design; East site (60% design completion by June 1, 1993)/ West site (95 % design in progress) Operational; Completion planned Spring 1995 PRP lead/Federal oversight; ERM Northcentral-pri me Richard Boice 312-886-4740

MIDCO II, IN (06/30/89)

Soil vapor extraction

Drum storage/ disposal

Soil (12,200 cy)

VOCs (Methylene chloride, TCE, 2-Butanone, Toluene)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; ERM Northwest-prime

Rich Boice 312-886-4740

Main Street Well Field, IN (03/29/91)

Soil vapor extraction with horizontal wells

Solvent recovery, Water supply contamination from many sources

Soil (22,000 cy) to a depth of 10 feet

VOCs (TCE)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Geraghty & Miller

Deborah Orr 312-886-7576

Seymour Recycling, IN (09/30/87) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil vapor extraction (No need for emissions treatment)

Chemical waste management and incineration

Soil (200,000 cy) 12 acres to a depth of 10 feet

VOCs (TCA, Carbon tetrachloride, PCE, TCE, Vinyl chlorie, Benzene)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie Engineering (installation), Geraghty & Miller (operation)

Jeff Gore 312-886-6552

A-38

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

5 Wayne Waste Reclamation, IN (03/30/90) Soil vapor extraction with air flushing Municipal landfill, Oil reclamation Soil (300,000 cy) 10 acres to a depth of 20 feet VOCs (TCE, DCE, Vinyl chloride, BTEX) Design completed but not installed; Design completed Feb 2/94 In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Warzyn, Inc. Duane Heaton 312-886-6399

Chem Central, MI (09/30/91)

Soil vapor extraction (vapor treatment through carbon)

Chemical packaging and distribution

Soil (6,200 cy) to 8 ft deep

VOCs (DCE, TCE, TCA, BTEX), SVOCs (Naphthalene, 2-methyl naphthalene) VOCs (TCE, DCE, Vinyl chloride, BTEX)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; WW Engineering & Science

Colleen Hart 312-353-8752

Clare Water Supply, MI (09/16/92)

Soil vapor extraction with horizontal wells air flushing with vertical wells Soil vapor extraction

Industrial area with above/below ground tanks-- multisource groundwater site

Soil (54,800 cy) vadose zone & dewatered area to 25 ft deep

Predesign; Design planned to begin Spring 1994 Predesign; PD completion planned Spring 1994

Federal Lead/ PRP Funded; Seacore Environmental Engineering PRP lead/Federal oversight; Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr, & Huber PRP lead/Federal oversight; Fishbeck,Thomp son,Carr,& Huber

Jon Peterson 312-353-1264

Electro-Voice, OU 1, MI (06/23/92)

Audio equipment manufacturer

Soil (2,100 cy) down to 50 feet

VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl chloride), PAHs

Eugenia Chow 312-353-3156

Kysor of Cadillac Industrial*, MI (09/29/89)

Soil vapor extraction

Machine shops, Truck parts manufacturing

Soil (13,200 cy)

VOCs (TCE, Xylene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994

Leah Evison 312-886-4696

A-39

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

5 Peerless Plating, MI (09/21/92) Soil vapor extraction with horizontal wells Electroplating Soil (6,500 cy) depth to 7 feet VOCs (1,2-DCE, TCE, Benzene, Ethylbenzene) In design; Design completion planned December 1994 In design; negotiating with PRP Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994 Federal lead/Fund Financed; PRC Environmental Management, Inc. PRP lead/Federal oversight State lead/Fund Financed Tom Pay 312-886-5991

Springfield Township Dump, MI (09/29/90)

Soil vapor extraction

Industrial landfill

Soil (28,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, TCA, Chlorobenzene, Toluene) VOCs (TCE, PCE, TCA)

Mary Lou Martin 312-353-9660

Sturgis Municipal Well Field, MI (09/30/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Solvent recovery

Soil Area and depth unknown, < 200 ft. deep

Terese Van Donsel 312-353-6564 Steve Padovani 312-353-6755

ThermoChem, Inc. OU 1, MI (09/30/91)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing ; May include biological enhancement Soil vapor extraction (with Nitrogen sparging during part of operation)

Recycling facility for organic solvents.

Soil (50,000 cy) to a depth of 17 - 32 feet

VOCs (PCE, TCE, Ethylbenzene, Xylene)

In design

Federal lead/Fund Financed; ACOE (Design)

Jim Hahnenberg 312-353-4213

Verona Well Field (Thomas Solvent/Raymond Road)*, MI (08/12/85)

Municipal water supply

Soil (35,000 cy) one half acre to a depth of 18 feet

VOCs (Dichloromethane, Chloroform, Carbon Tetrachloride, BTEX, Vinyl chloride), SVOCs (Napthalene)

Completed; Operational from 3/88 to 5/92

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Terra Vac (subcontractor to CH2M Hill)

Margaret Guerriero 312-886-0399

A-40

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

5 Verona Well Field, OU 2, MI (06/28/91) Soil vapor extraction Augmentation with air flushing is being considered Machine shops, Municipal water supply Soil (30,000 cy) VOCs (PCE, TCA, Toluene) Operational PRP lead/Federal oversight; Geraghty & Miller (Prime), Maumee Bay (Remedial subcontractor) State lead/Fund Financed Margaret Guerriero 312-886-0399

Long Prairie Groundwater Contamination, MN (06/27/88)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing followed by GAC for off-gas

Dry cleaners

Soil (3,600 cy) to a depth of 15 feet

VOCs (DCE, PCE, TCE, Vinyl chloride)

Design completed but not installed; Installation to begin Spring 1995 In design; Design completion planned Spring 1995

Jan Bartlett 312-886-5438 Maureen Johnson (MN) 612-296-7353

Miami County Incinerator, OH (06/30/89)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing Treatment of off-gas determined in design Soil vapor extraction with horizontal trenches down to 15 feet

Municipal landfill, Surface impoundment

Soil and solids combined (98,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, PCE, Toluene)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Connestogo Roveis-Prime

Anthony Rutter 312-886-8961

Pristine (ROD Amendment)*, OH (03/30/90) See also Thermal Desorption

Industrial waste treatment facility

Soil (19,400 cy) 3 acres and 15 feet deep

VOCs (Chloroform, DCA, PCE, TCE, Benzene), SVOCs (Phenol)

Being installed; installation to be completed late 1994; will operate 7-10 years

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie (installation)

Thomas Alcamo 312-886-7278

A-41

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

5 Skinner Landfill (OU2), OH (06/04/93) Soil vapor extraction Sanitary landfill and buried industrial waste Lagoon Soil (quantity unknown) VOCs (Toluene,Xylene, TCA) Predesign; PD completion planned Summer 1995; evaluating technical feasibility In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight Bruce Sypniewski 312-886-6189

Zanesville Well Field, OH (09/30/91) See also Soil Washing

Soil vapor extraction with horizontal wells followed by excavation and soil washing for metals Soil vapor extraction

Solvent recovery, Auto parts manufacturing

Soil (36,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, DCE)

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Dave Wilson 312-886-1476 FTS-886-1476

City Disposal Corporation Landfill, WI (09/28/92)

Industrial landfill, Municipal landfill

Soil (quantity unknown) quantity

VOCs (Tetrahydrofuran)

Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Rust Environmental (prime contractor) PRP lead/Federal oversight; Warzyn-Prime

Russ Hart 312-886-4844 Mike Schmoller (WI) 608-275-3303

Hagen Farm Source Control OU, WI (09/17/90)

Soil vapor extraction

Industrial and municipal waste disposal

Soil (67,000 cy)

VOCs (Vinyl chloride, 2-Butanone, BTEX), Organics (Tetrahydrofuran) VOCs (Vinyl Chloride, 1,2-DCA, Methylene Chloride, BTEX)

Operational; Completion planned Summer 1996

Steve Padovani 312-353-6755

Muskego Sanitary Landfill, Interim Action OU 1, WI (06/12/92)

Soil vapor extraction

Industrial landfill, Municipal landfill

Soil (300 cy) approximately 1 acre down to 15 ft deep

Design completed but not installed; Installation planned Summer 1994

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Rust (Design)

Bill Haubold 312-353-6261

A-42

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

5 Wausau Groundwater Contamination, WI (09/29/89) Soil vapor extraction Off-Gas Treatment Machine shops, Bulk chemical distribution Soil (1,300 cy) to a depth of 30 feet VOCs (TCE, DCE, PCE) Operational; Completion planned Summer 1995 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Hydrogeo-Chem (sub to Conestoga-Rov ers & Associates) PRP lead/Federal oversight Margaret Guerriero 312-886-0399

Prewitt Abandoned Refinery, NM (09/30/92) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ), Other Technologies Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc., OU 2, TX (09/06/91) See also Other Technologies Chemplex (OU 2), IA (05/12/93)

Soil vapor extraction with Air Sparging

Crude oil refinery

Soil (quantity unknown)

Organics (NAPLs)

Predesign

Monica Chapa-Smith 214-655-6780

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing and air sparging of groundwater Soil vapor extraction

Petroleum refining and reuse

Soil (300,000 cy) to a depth of 30 feet

VOCs (BTEX), SVOCs (Naphthalene)

Predesign; PD completion planned Summer 1995

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Chris Villareal 214-655-6758

Landfill

Soil (350,000 cy)

VOCs (Benzene, TCE)

Predesign; Negotiations with PRPs ongoing Predesign; Unilateral Order for RD/RA is prepared

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Nancy Johnson 913-551-7703

McGraw Edison, IA (09/24/93)

Soil vapor extraction

Former manufacturing unit

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (TCE)

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Pauletta France 913-551-7701

A-43

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

7 Coleman Operable Unit 29th and Mead, KS (09/29/92) Soil vapor extraction Formerly vehicle manufacturing, currently heating, air conditioning equipment manufacturing Soil (2,000,000 cy) VOCs (TCE, 1,1,1-TCA, DCE, Vinyl chloride, Toluene) Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994; Soil vapor system already in place. ROD calls for expansion of the system In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Groundwater Technologies, Inc. Ken Rapplean 913-551-7769

Hastings GW Contamination (Colorado Ave)*, NE (09/28/88)

Soil vapor extraction

Industrial metal finishing/cleaning

Soil (42,700 cy)

VOCs (PCE, TCE, DCE, TCA)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; ENSR (design contractor)

Darrel Sommerhauser 913-551-7711 Richard Schlenker (NE) 402-471-3388

Hastings GW Contamination (Far-Mar Co.)*, NE (09/30/88)

Soil vapor extraction

Former grain storage area (fumigants)

Soil targeting layers at 35 ft and 110 ft

VOCs (Carbon tetrachloride, Ethylene dibromide)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 Completed; Operational from 7/92 to 5/93

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Burns & McDonald

Susan Hoff 913-551-7786

Hastings GW Contamination, Well No. 3*, NE (09/26/89)

Soil vapor extraction

Former grain storage area (fumigants)

Soil 1 acre down to 120 feet deep

VOCs (Carbon tetrachloride)

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Morrison Knudsen

Diane Easley 913-551-7797

A-44

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

7 Lindsay Manufacturing, NE (09/28/90) Soil vapor extraction with air flushing will address hot spots only Soil vapor extraction Electroplating, Galvanized pipes for irrigation systems Soil targeting a depth of 25 - 40 feet VOCs (DCA, DCE, TCE, PCE) In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994 Operational; Completion planned 2001; operational since 2/88 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Dames & Moore Cecelia Tapla 913-551-7733

Waverly Groundwater Contamination, NE (09/26/90)

Grain storage (fumigants)

Soil (160,000 cy) up to 240,000 cy(5 acres, 20-30 ft deep)

VOCs (Carbon tetrachloride, Chloroform)

USDA Lead/Federal Oversight

Jeff Weatherford 913-551-7695 Mary Hansen (Argonne National Lab) 708-972-4938

Chemical Sales Company, OU 1*, CO (06/27/91)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing will recirculate treated emissions Soil vapor extraction

Chemical sales and distribution, spillage at tank farm

Soil (360,000 cy) to 35 ft deep

VOCs (PCE, TCE)

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994

PRP lead/Federal oversight; ENSR

Jim Berkley 303-293-1817

Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace), CO (09/24/90) See also Thermal Desorption

Aerospace equipment manufacturer - bulk storage facility

Soil Less than one acre, depth unknown

VOCs (TCE)

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994

PRP/State oversite under RCRA; Geraghty & Miller

George Dancik 303-293-1506 Charles Johnson 303-692-3348

Rocky Flats OU 2, Interim Remedial Action Plan, CO (08/10/92)

Soil vapor extraction

Former nuclear weapons research and development, production, and plutonium reprocessing complex

Soil (25,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, PCE, Carbon tetrachloride)

Operational; Completion planned Summer 1995

DOE Lead/Federal Oversight DOE ERP; Woodward Clyde, Roy F. Weston, Layne Environmental

Bill Frazier 303-294-1081 Scott Grace (Rocky Flats) 303-966-7199

A-45

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

8 Rocky Mountain Arsenal OU 18, interim response, CO (02/26/90) Soil vapor extraction with air flushing Motor pool area Soil (70,000 cy) 100 feet radius and 60 feet deep VOCs (TCE, Ethylbenzene, Toluene) Completed; Operational from 7/91 to 12/91 U. S. Army lead; Roy F. Weston, Ebasco, Harding Lawson, Woodward Clyde Stacey Eriksen 303-294-1083 James Smith (Rocky Mtn Arsenal) 303-289-0249

Sand Creek Industrial OU 1*, CO (09/29/89)

Soil vapor extraction

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage, Refinery

Soil (38,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, PCE, Methylene chloride, Chloroform)

Operational; Completion planned Fall 1994; Removed 70 tons to date Predesign; PD completion planned Spring 1995 In design; Design completion planned Spring 1995; Pilot-scale study completed

Federal lead/Fund Financed; OHM

Erna Acheson 303-294-1971

Utah Power and Light/American Barrel, UT (07/07/93)

Soil vapor extraction

Coal gasification

Soil (15,000 cy)

VOCs (Styrene), PAHs (Naphthalene)

PRP lead/Federal oversight

David Ostrander 303-293-1530

Hassayampa Landfill*, AZ (08/15/92)

Soil vapor extraction

Industrial landfill

Soil Approximately 10 acres

VOCs (1,1-DCE, 1,1,1-TCA, 1,2-DCE, 1,1-DCA, TCE, 1,2-DCB)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Conestoga-Rov ers, Errol L. Montgomery & Ass., Inc.

Robert Riccio 415-744-2369

A-46

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

9 Indian Bend Wash Area, AZ (09/27/93) Soil vapor extraction Dry cleaners, Eletroplating, Industrial Landfill Soil (quantity unknown) VOCs (TCE, PCE, DCE, 1,1,1-TCA) In design Federal lead/Fund Financed; CH2M HILL Emily Roth 415-744-2367 Jeff Dhont 415-744-2363 Winifred Au (AZ) 510-251-2888 (Ext.2126)

Indian Bend Wash, South Area, OU 1, AZ (09/12/91)

Soil vapor extraction May vary technology at different facilities within

Dry cleaners, Electroplating, Industrial landfill, Municipal landfill

Soil maximum depth - 90 ft

VOCs (PCE, TCE, TCA)

In design; Pilot project under the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model initiative, schedules may vary by unit In design; Design completion planned 1995; Pilot system operational but full scale technology still being evaluated Operational

PRP lead/Federal oversight; mixed funding

Jeff Dhont 415-744-2363

Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (09/30/88)

Soil vapor extraction

Manufacturing facility

Soil 60 ft radius to a depth of 25 feet

VOCs (TCA, TCE, DCE, PCE,, Ethylbenzene)

PRP lead/State oversight; Dames and Moore

Fred Schauffler 415-744-2359 Jeff Kulon (AZ) 602-207-4181 Hotline 602-207-4360

Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Area (North & South Fac), AZ (09/26/89)

Soil vapor extraction

Defense related manufacturing

Soil (271,200 cy) North: 1,200 cy; South: 270,000 cy, 60 ft deep

VOCs (DCE, TCE, MEK, Acetone)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Metcalf & Eddy South Area, Malcome Pirnie - North Area

Craig Cooper 415-744-2370

A-47

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

9 Williams AFB, (OU2), AZ (12/30/92) See also Bioremediation (In Situ) Soil vapor extraction Bioenhancement AFB, Flight Training Base Soil (54,000 cy) VOCs (Benzene 4, Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-DCA Ethyl Benzene), SVOCs Operational; Operation began 3/94 USAF (EPA Oversite); Earth Technologies Raman Mendoza 415-744-2407 Dr.William L. Harris (USAF) 602-988-6486

Fairchild Semiconductor (San Jose)*, CA (03/20/89)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

Semiconductor manufacturing

Soil (42,000 cy)

VOCs (TCA, 1,1-DCE, Freon-113, Isopropyl alcohol, PCE), Xylene) VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl Chloride, DCA, DCE, Freon), SVOCs (Phenol)

Completed; operational from 1/89 to 5/90

PRP lead/State oversight; Canonie Engineering

Helen McKinley 510-744-1889 Steve Hill (CA) 510-286-0433

Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-I*, CA (06/09/89)

Soil vapor extraction

Semiconductor manufacture and metal finisher

Soil (quantity unknown)

Design completed but not installed; Installation planned October 1994

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie Engineering

Elizabeth Adams 415-744-2235 James Boarer (Canonie) 415-744-2231 Thomas Jones (Fairchild) 415-960-0822

Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-II*, CA (06/30/89)

Soil vapor extraction

Semiconductor manufacturing, Metal finishing facility

Soil (50,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl Chloride, DCA, DCE, Freon), SVOCs (Phenol)

Design completed but not installed; Installation planned October 1994

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie Engineering

Elizabeth Adams 415-744-2235 James Boarer (Canonie) 415-960-1640 Thomas Jones (Fairchild) 415-960-0822

A-48

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

9 Hexcel, CA (09/21/93) See also Bioremediation (In Situ), Other Technologies 9 IBM (San Jose)*, CA (12/15/88) Soil vapor extraction with air flushing Manufacturing Soil (quantity unknown) VOCs (PCE, Acetone, MEK, Benzene) Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994 Operational; Completion planned Spring 2001 In design; Operation planned Spring 1995 PRP lead/State oversight Mark Johnson 510-286-0305

Soil vapor extraction

Computer manufacture

Soil (24,000 cy)

VOCs (TCA, Acetone, Freon, Isopropyl Alcohol, Xylenes) VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl chloride, DCA, DCE, Freon), SVOCs (Xylene)

PRP lead/State oversight; Terra Vac

Steve Hill (CA) 510-286-0433

Intel, Mountain View*, CA (06/09/89)

Soil vapor extraction

Semiconductor manufacturing

Soil (3,000 cy)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Weiss Associates

Elizabeth Adams 415-744-2235 Eric Madera 408-522-7048 Michael Maley (CA) 510-450-6159

Intersil, CA (09/27/90)

Soil vapor extraction

Semi conductor manufacturing

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (TCE, 1,1,1-TCA, Xylene)

Completed

State lead/Fund Financed

Marie Lacey 415-744-2234 Roshy Mozafar (CA) 510-286-1041

Intersil/Siemens, CA (09/27/90)

Soil vapor extraction

Semiconductor manufacturing

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (TCE, 1,1,1-TCA, Xylene)

Operational; Ongoing at Siemens, completed at Intersil Fall 1993

State lead/Fund Financed; Levine-Fricke (Siemens)

Marie Lacey 415-744-2234 Steve Morse (CA) 510-286-0304 Roshy Mozafar 510-286-1041

A-49

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

9 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA (07/15/92) 9 Lorentz Barrel and Drum (OU 1), CA (08/26/93) Soil vapor extraction Research and development facility Soil (quantity unknown) VOCs (Fuel hydrocarbons) In design DOE lead/Federal oversight Federal lead/Fund Financed; URS Mike Gill 415-744-2383

Soil vapor extraction

Drum recycling business

Soil (50,000 cy)

VOCs

Predesign; Design to begin Summer 1994 Operational; Completion planned Fall 1996; Started operation in Spring 1993 Operational; Completion planned Fall 1996 In design

Darrin Swartz-Larson 415-744-2233

Monolithic Memories/AMD Arques, Subunit 2, CA (09/11/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Semiconductor manufacturing

Soil (3,400 cy)

VOCs (PCE, TCE, TCA), PAHs

State lead/Fund Financed; Pacific Environmental Group

Cecil Felix (CA) 510-286-1249

National Semiconductor (Monolithic Memories), CA (09/11/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Semiconductor manufacturing

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (PCE, DCE, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene), SVOCs VOCs (Methlyene chloride, DCA, Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene) VOCs (TCE, PCE, Chlorobenzene, BTEX)

State lead/Fund Financed; Harding Lawson & Associates PRP lead/Federal oversight

Cecil Felix (CA) 510-286-1249

Pacific Coast Pipeline, CA (03/31/92)

Soil vapor extraction

Petroleum refining and reuse, ; petroleum pumping station

Soil (quantity unknown)

Cathy Mooremery 415-744-2243

Purity Oil Sales OU 2, CA (09/30/92)

Soil vapor extraction

Petroleum refining and reuse

Soil (64,000 cy)

Predesign; PD completion planned Winter 1994

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie

Joanne Cola 415-744-2238

A-50

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

9 Raytheon, Mountain View*, CA (06/09/89) Soil vapor extraction Semiconductor manufacturing, Metal refinishing and aircraft maintenance Soil (15,000 cy) VOCs (TCE, TCA, DCE), SVOCs (Phenol) In design; Installation planned to start January 1996 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Groundwater Technology Inc. Elizabeth Adams 415-744-2235 Eric Madera (PRP) 415-966-7772

Sacramento Army Depot (Burn Pits OU), CA (03/29/93)

Soil vapor extraction

Electro-Optics equipment repair, metal plating & Treatment painting

Soil (16,900 cy)

VOCs, SVOCs

Operational; Completion planned Fall 1994; operational since Spring 1994 Completed; Operational from 8/92 to 1/93

U.S.Army (IRP)/EPA Oversite; OHM

Marlin Mezquita 415-744-2393 Dan Osburn (SAD) 916-388-4344

Sacramento Army Depot, Tank 2 OU, CA (12/09/91)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

Solvent storage tank at an Army Depot

Soil (150 cy)

VOCs (PCE, Ethylbenzene and Total Xylenes)

Army (USACE)/DoD Financed - IRP Program; Terra Vac

Paul Townsend (USACE Sacramento) 916-557-6947 Dan Oburn (Sacramento Army Depot) 916-388-4344 Marlin Mezquita 415-744-2393

Signetics (AMD 901) (TRW), Signetics OU, CA (09/11/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Semiconductor manufacturing

Soil (32,000 cy) approximately 1/4 acre down to 20 feet

VOCs (TCE, DCE, DCA)

Operational; Although ROD was signed in FY91, PRP has operated the remedy for several years

PRP lead/State oversight; Weiss & Associates

Darrin Swartz-Larson 415-744-2233 Kevin Graves (CA) 510-286-0435

A-51

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

9 Solvent Service, CA (09/27/90) Soil vapor extraction with heat enhancement Solvent recycling facility Soil (quantity unknown) VOCs (TCA, Acetone, Ethylbenzene, Xylene), SVOCs (Dichlorobenzene) Operational RWQCB; David Keith Todd Engineers Marie Lacey 415-744-2234 Steve Morse (CA) 510-286-0304 Kevin Graves (CA) 510-286-0435

Spectra Physics, OU 1, CA (03/22/91)

Soil vapor extraction with horizontal wells

Semiconductor manufacturing, Laser manufacturing

Soil (7,200 cy)

VOCs (TCE)

Operational; Completion planned Winter 1997

PRP lead/State oversight; Levine - Fricke

Sean Hogan 415-744-2236 Steve Hill (CA) 510-286-4833

Van Waters and Rogers, CA (09/30/91)

Soil vapor extraction

Chemical packaging facility

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (PCE, TCE, TCA)

Operational; since Fall 1993

PRP lead/State oversight; Van Waters and Rogers

Marie Lacey 415-744-2234 Susan Gladstone (CA) 510-286-0840

Watkins-Johnson*, CA (06/29/90)

Soil vapor extraction

Semiconductor manufacturing

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (DCE, TCA, TCE)

Being installed; operation planned Fall 1994

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Watkins

Kay Lawrence 415-744-2289

A-52

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

10

Eielson Air Force Base*, AK (09/29/92) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil vapor extraction

Tactical air support installation Airplane fueling and maintenance

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (JP-4), SVOCs (petroleum hydrocarbons, diesel fuel)

Operational

Federal Facility lead/DERA Funded; EA Engineering

Mary Jane Nearman 206-553-6642 Rielle Markey (AK) 907-451-2117 Capt. Max Gandy 907-377-4361

10

Commencement Bay/S. Tacoma Channel/Well 12A*, WA (05/03/85)

Soil vapor extraction

Solvent recycler/ paint manufacturer

Soil (100,000 cy) to 35 ft deep

VOCs (PCE, TCE, TCA)

Operational; Completion planned Fall 1999

Federal lead/Fund Financed; AWD Technologies, Inc. Federal Facility, Air Force Lead/Federal Oversite; Engineering-Sci ence, Inc. Federal Facility, Army lead/Federal Oversight; USACE

Kevin Rochlin 206-553-2106

10

Fairchild AFB Priority 1 OU's (OU 1) Craig Rd LF., WA (02/13/93)

Soil vapor extraction

Landfill

Soil (945,700 cy)

VOCs (TCE)

In design; 60% design completed. Anticipate construction to start by 10/94 In design; Pilot study in design

Cami Grandinetti 206-553-8696

10

Fort Lewis Military Res. Lf 4 & Sol. Refined Coal, WA (09/24/93) See also Soil Washing, Other Technologies

Soil vapor extraction with Air Sparging

Military municipal landfill

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (PCE, TCE, DCE, Vinyl Chloride)

Rob Kiveit 206-753-9014

A-53

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Washing
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

King of Prussia, NJ (09/28/90)

Soil washing using water with washing agents as an additive

Waste processing facility

Soil, Sludge, and Sediments combined (19,200 cy)

Metals (Chromium, Copper, Nickel)

Completed; operational 6/93-10/93

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Alternative Remedial Technologies, Inc. PRP lead/Federal oversight; Metcalf & Eddy (Design) Federal lead/Fund Financed; Ebasco (Design)

Kim O'Connell (temporary contact) 212-264-8127

Myers Property, NJ (09/28/90) See also Dechlorination

Soil washing coupled with dechlorination

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage

Soil (48,000 cy), Sediments (500 cy)

Metals (Cadmium, Lead, Arsenic, Copper)

In design; Design completion planned Spring 1996 In design; Design completion planned January 1995

John Prince 212-264-1213

Vineland Chemical, OU 1 and OU 2, NJ (09/29/89) See also In situ Flushing

Soil Washing

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage

Soil (62,000 cy)

Metals (Arsenic)

Matthew Westgate 212-264-3406 Steve Hadel (USACE Kansas City) 816-426-5221

GE Wiring Devices, PR (09/30/88)

Soil washing using water with KI2 solution as an additive,

Wiring services facility

Soil and sludge combined (5,500 cy)

Metals (Mercury)

In design; Design completion planned Spring 1995

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Morrison Knudsen Corporation (Design)

Caroline Kwan 212-264-0151

A-54

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Washing (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Cabot Carbon/Koppers, FL (09/27/90) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ), Bioremediation (In Situ) Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits (amended ROD)*, FL (06/16/92) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Soil washing followed by bioremediation of fines

Wood preserving, Pine tar and turpentine manufacturing

Soil (6,400 cy)

SVOCs (PCP), PAHs, Metals (Arsenic, Chromium)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 In design; Remedy being reconsidered; further site characterizatio n is underway Design completed but not installed; Construction to begin Summer 1995 Predesign; PD completion planned Spring 1995

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Patsy Goldberg 404-347-6265

Soil washing followed by bioremediation of fines

Waste oil recycler

Soil and Sludge combined (57,000 cy)

VOCs, PCBs, PAHs, Metals (lead)

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Tony Best 404-347-6259

Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (06/30/89) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Soil washing using water only may be followed by s/s

Wood preserving

Soil (24,000 cy) up to 26,000 cy

PAHs (Creosote), Metals (Copper, Chromium, Arsenic)

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Jon Bornholm 404-347-7791

Zanesville Well Field, OH (09/30/91) See also Soil vapor extraction

Soil washing ex situ preceded by vacuum extraction (in situ)

Solvent recovery, Auto parts manufacturing

Soil (1,800 cy)

Metals (Lead, Mercury)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Seacore Science & Engineering (Design)

Dave Wilson 312-886-1476 FTS-886-1476

A-55

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Washing (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

5 Moss-American*, WI (09/27/90) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Soil washing followed by bioremediation of fines Wood preserving Soil (80,000 cy) PAHs Predesign; PD completion planned 1995; Bench-scale study underway PRP lead/Federal oversight; Weston, Inc.(prime contractor), Bergmann USA (subcontractor) PRP lead/Federal oversight; McLaren/Hart (Design) PRP lead/Federal oversight; ENSR (Design) Russ Hart 312-886-4844

Arkwood, AR (09/28/90)

Soil washing followed by incineration of residuals

Wood preserving

Soil (20,400 cy), Sludge (425 cy)

SVOCs (PCP), Dioxins, PAHs

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1995 In design

Cynthia Kaleri 214-655-6772

Koppers/Texarkana*, TX (09/23/88) See also In situ Flushing

Soil washing using water with a surfactant as an additive,

Wood preserving

Soil (19,400 cy)

PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Creosote), Organics (NAPLs), Metals (Arsenic) PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(a)anthrace ne, Chrysene)

Ursula Lennox 214-655-6743

South Cavalcade Street*, TX (09/26/88) See also In situ Flushing

Soil Washing

Wood preserving

Soil (11,000 cy)

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994 In design; Remedy being reconsidered

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Glenn Celerier 214-655-8523

Koppers Company, Inc. (Oroville Plant), CA (04/04/90) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil Washing

Wood preserving

Soil (200,000 cy)

SVOCs (PCPs), Dioxins, PAHs

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Fred Schauffler 415-744-2359

A-56

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Washing (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

10 Gould, Inc.*, OR (03/31/88) Soil washing followed by s/s of solid residuals Battery recycling/ disposal Soil (11,000 cy), Solids (90,000 cy) Battery casings Metals (Lead) Operational; Completion planned Summer 1995; Operation started Fall 1993 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie Environmental Chip Humphries (EPA Oregon operat.) 503-326-2678 Mike Moran (Portland USACE) 503-326-4192

10

Naval Submarine Base, Bangor Site A, OU 1, WA (12/06/91)

Soil Washing

Federal facility, ordnance detonation

Soil (7,100 cy)

Ordnance compounds (TNT, RDX, DNT)

Being installed; operation planned to begin 9/94

Federal Facility, Navy Lead/Federal Oversite; OHM Remediation Services Corp.

Jeff Rodin 206-553-4497 Chris Drury (Navy) 206-396-5984

A-57

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Solvent Extraction
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Norwood PCBs, MA (09/29/89)

Solvent extraction

PCB capacitor manufacturing/ testing

Soil (50,000 cy), Sediments (2,000 cy)

PCBs, PAHs

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994 In design; Design completion planned September 1995 In design; Design completion planned Spring 1995 Design completed but not installed; Installation scheduled for Summer 1995

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Bob Cianciarulo 617-573-5778

O'Connor*, ME (09/27/89)

Solvent extraction (may be followed by s/s for lead)

Salvage and electrical transformer recycling

Soil and Sediments combined (23,500 cy)

PCBs, PAHs

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Ross Gilleland 617-573-5766

Carolina Transformer, NC (08/29/91)

Solvent extraction (may be followed by s/s)

Transformer repair

Soil (9,000 cy)

PCBs

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Luis Flores 404-347-7791

United Creosoting*, TX (09/29/89)

Solvent extraction (Critical fluid extraction followed by incineration of fluids)

Wood preserving

Soil (85,000 cy) with "tar mats" combined

SVOCs (PCP, trace dioxins/furans), PAHs

State lead/Fund Financed; C.F. Systems

Earl Hendrick 214-655-8519 LaReine Pound (TX) 512-239-2437

A-58

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Cannon Engineering/Bridgewater , MA (03/31/88)

Thermal aeration (vapors captured on carbon)

Chemical waste storage and incineration facility

Soil (11,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, Vinyl Chloride, Benzene, Toluene)

Completed; Operational from 5/90 to 10/90

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie Engineering PRP lead/Federal oversight; Chemical Waste Management, Inc. PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie Engineering PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie Engineering Federal lead/Fund Financed

Richard Goehlert 617-573-5742

Re-Solve*, MA (09/24/87)

Low temperature thermal treatment

Chemical reclamation facility

Soil (22,500 cy)

VOCs, PCBs

Operational; Completion planned Fall 1994

Joe Lemay 617-573-9622

McKin*, ME (07/22/85)

Thermal aeration (vapors captured on carbon)

Waste storage/Transfer & recycle facility.

Soil (11,500 cy)

VOCs (TCE, BTX)

Completed; Operational from 7/86 2/87

Sheila Eckman 617-573-5784

Ottati & Goss, NH (01/16/87)

Thermal aeration

Drum storage/ disposal

Soil (16,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, PCE, DCA, Benzene)

Completed; Operational from 6/89 to 9/89

Stephen Calder 617-573-9626

Industrial Latex, OU 1, NJ (09/30/92)

Low temperature thermal treatment

Manufacturing of chemical adhesives and natural and synthetic rubber compounds

Soil and Sediments combined (34,700 cy)

PCBs

Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994

Romona Pezzella 212-264-8216

A-59

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

2 Lipari Landfill Marsh Sediment*, NJ (07/11/88) Low temperature thermal treatment Industrial landfill, Municipal landfill Soil (57,000 cy) marsh soil VOCs (Chlorinated hydrocarbons, BTEX), SVOCs (Bis-2-chloroethyl ether) Being installed; Operation to begin Summer 1994; completion scheduled for late 1994/early 1995 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Sevenson Environmental Services (prime contractor), Williams Environmental (subcontractor) Federal lead/Fund Financed; USACE conducting design Fred Cataneo 212-264-9542

Metaltec/Aerosystems, OU 1 - Soil Treatment*, NJ (06/30/86)

Low temperature thermal treatment (vapors captured on carbon)

Metal manufacturing

Soil (9,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE)

Operational; Completion planned December 1994

Courtney McEnery 212-264-1251 Mark Keast (USACE, Kansas City) 816-426-5832

Reich Farms*, NJ (09/30/88)

Thermal desorption (vapors will be captured on carbon) Thermal Desorption

Drum storage/ disposal

Soil (8,600 cy)

VOCs (TCE, PCE, TCA), SVOCs (Phthalates)

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994 In design; Design completion planned Summer 1995

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Kim O'Connell (temporary contact) 212-264-8127

Universal Oil Products, NJ (09/30/93)

Chemical processing plant

Soil (23,000 cy)

VOCs, PCBs, PAHs

State lead/Fund Financed

Rich Puvogel 212-264-9836 Gwen Barunus (NJ) 609-633-1455

A-60

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

2 Waldick Aerospace Devices (OU 1)*, NJ (09/29/87) Low temperature thermal treatment (followed by offsite s/s and disposal) Manufacture/ electroplating of plane parts Soil (4,000 cy) VOCs (TCE, PCE) Completed; Operational from 5/93 to 10/93 Federal lead/Fund Financed; Rust Remedial Services, Inc. John Prince 212-264-1213 George Buc (USACE-NY District) 908-389-3040

American Thermostat, NY (06/29/90)

Low temperature thermal treatment

Thermostat manufacturing

Soil (20,000 cy)

VOCs (PCE, TCE)

Operational; Completion planned December 1994

Federal lead/Fund Financed; EBASCO (prime contractor), Williams Environmental Services (subcontractor) Federal lead/Fund Financed; USACE conducting design PRP lead/Federal oversight

Christos Tsiamis 212-264-5713

Claremont Polychemical - Soil Remedy, NY (09/28/90)

Low temperature thermal treatment

Paint/ink formation

Soil (3,000 cy)

VOCs (PCE)

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994

Dick Kaplin 212-264-3819

Fulton Terminals, Soil Treatment, NY (09/29/89)

Low temperature thermal treatment

Former hazardous waste storage facility

Soil (8,000 cy) (Depth varies from 12 to 15 feet).

VOCs (TCE, DCE, Benzene, Xylene)

In design; Design completion planned January 1995

Christos Tsiamis 212-264-5713

A-61

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

2 Reynolds Metals Company Study Area Site, (RMC), NY (09/27/93) Thermal Desorption Active aluminum production plant Sediments (14,500 cy) PCBs In design; Design completion planned December 1995 In design; Design completion planned early 1995 Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994 Operational; Completion planned November 1994; Site work began 7/93; full-scale clean up 12/93; start up again in 5/94 PRP lead/Federal oversight Lisa Carson 212-264-6857

Sarney Farm, NY (09/27/90)

Thermal Desorption

Industrial landfill, Municipal landfill

Soil (2,400 cy) 2,000 - 8,000 cy

VOCs (Chloroform, TCE, PCE, Toluene), SVOCs (Phthalates) VOCs (DCE, TCE), PCBs

Federal lead/Fund Financed; CDM (Design)

Kevin Willis 212-264-8777

Solvent Savers, NY (09/30/90)

Low temperature thermal treatment

Solvent recovery, Chemical reclamation

Soil (60,000 cy)

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Lisa Wong 212-264-9348

U.S.A. Letterkenny SE Area, OU1*, PA (06/28/91)

Low temperature thermal treatment (may need s/s for metals after thermal desorption)

Munitions manufacturing/ storage, Drum storage

Soil (15,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, DCE, Ethylbenzene, Xylene)

Federal lead/Fund Financed; McLaren Hart

Dennis Orenshaw 215-597-7858 Brian Hoke (Letterkenny) 717-267-8483

A-62

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

3 William Dick Lagoons, OU 3, PA (03/31/93) Thermal Desorption Wastewater disposal lagoons Soil (24,000 cy) VOCs (TCE, PCE, MEK), SVOCs Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994; Negotiating Consent Decree. PRP conducting a treatability study for SVE on deep soil layer In design; Design completion planned late 1995 In design; Design completion planned Spring 1995; Treatability studies planned PRP lead/Federal oversight Patrick McManus 215-597-8257

Rentokil, VA (06/22/93)

Thermal Desorption

Wood preserving

Soil (13,000 cy)

SVOCs (PCP), Dioxins, PAHs

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Andy Palestini 215-597-1286

Saunders Supply Co, OU 1, VA (09/30/91) See also Dechlorination

Low temperature thermal treatment

Wood preserving

Soil (25,000 cy)

SVOCs (PCP)

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Andy Palestini 215-597-1286

A-63

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

4 Ciba-Geigy (MacIntosh Plant) OU 2, AL (09/30/91) See also In situ Flushing Low temperature thermal treatment Agriculture applications, Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage, Other organic chemical manufacturing Soil and sludge combined (130,000 cy) to 20 ft depth VOCs, Biocides Predesign; PD completion planned summer 1996; Treatability studies ongoing; final decision on technology will be made late 1994 Predesign; Treatability studies ongoing; final decision on technology will be made late 1994 Operational; Completion planned October 1994; Began operation in April 1994 Predesign; PD completion planned Spring 1995 PRP lead/Federal oversight Charles King 404-347-6262

Ciba-Geigy (MacIntosh Plant) OU 4, AL (07/14/92) See also In situ Flushing

Thermal Desorption

Agriculture applications, Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage, Other organic chemical manufacturing

Soil and other waste combined (17,000 cy)

VOCs (Chloroform, Toluene, Xylene), Biocides (Atrazine, Diazinon, Prometryn, Simazine) PCBs, PAHs (Carcinogenic PAHs)

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Charles King 404-347-6262

Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1*, KY (09/30/91) See also Dechlorination

Thermal desorption Anaerobic low temperature thermal treatment

Drum storage/ disposal

Soil (18,500 cy)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Canonie (prime contractor), SoilTech (subcontractor) PRP lead/Federal oversight

Tony DeAngelo 404-347-7791

Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps, (OU 1 & OU 4), NC (09/30/91)

Thermal Desorption

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage

Soil (124,000 cy)

Biocides (DDT, Toxaphene, Benzene Hexachloride)

Kay Crane 404-347-7791 Randy McElveen (NC) 919-733-2801

A-64

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

4 Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits, NC (08/05/92) Low temperature thermal treatment Waste petroleum and septic tank sludge disposal pit Soil (10,100 cy), Sludge (quantity unknown) VOCs (BTEX), PAHs (Carcinogenic PAHs, Naphthalene) PCBs In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994 In design; Design completion planned late 1995 Federal lead/Fund Financed Beverly Hudson 404-347-7791

Sangamo/Twelve-Mile/H artwell PCB, OU 1, SC (12/19/90)

Thermal desorption (vapors captured on carbon)

Capacitor manufacturer

Soil and Sludge combined

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Bernie Hayes 404-347-7791 Richard Haynes (SC) 803-734-5487

Wamchem*, SC (06/30/88)

Thermal desorption using catalytic oxidation of vapor Thermal desorption, residual soil and vapor to be dechlorinated Low temperature thermal treatment followed by s/s for lead

Former dye manufacturing plant

Soil (2,200 cy)

VOCs (BTX)

Completed; operational during 8/93

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Four Seasons

Terry Tanner 404-347-7791

Arlington Blending & Packaging Co., OU 1*, TN (06/28/91)

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage, Other organic chemical manufacturing Industrial landfill, Municipal water supply

Soil (5,000 cy)

VOCs, SVOCs (PCP), Biocides (Chlordane, Heptachlor)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994 In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Derek Matory 404-347-7791

Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. OU 3 & OU 6, IL (12/31/90) See also Soil vapor extraction

Soil (6,000 cy)

VOCs (TCA, DCE, DCA, TCE, PCE, Vinyl chloride, Benzene, 4-methyl 2 pentanone), SVOCs (Naphthalene), PCBs

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Harding Lawson

Deborah Orr 312-886-7576

A-65

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

5 Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor, OU 3*, IL (03/31/89) 5 American Chemical Services*, IN (09/30/92) See also Soil vapor extraction Low temperature thermal treatment Marine products manufacturing Soil and sediments combined (16,000 cy) PCBs Completed; Operational from 1/92 to 7/92 Predesign; Schedule pending completion of negotiation with PRPs Predesign; Scheduled to end Summer 1994 Completed; Operational from 9/92 to 6/93 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Soiltech In negotiation Bill Bolen 312-353-6316

Low temperature thermal treatment

Other organic chemical manufacturing, Solvent recovery

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs, PCBs

Bill Bolen 312-353-6316

Reilly Tar and Chemical, IN (09/30/93)

Thermal Desorption

Wood preserving, Coal tar refinery and synthethic chemical plant Other organic chemical manufacturing

Soil (10,000 cy)

VOCs, SVOCs (PAHs,Pyridine)

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Dion Novak 312-886-4737

Anderson Development (ROD Amendment)*, MI (09/30/91)

Low temperature thermal treatment With off-site disposal of residuals Low temperature thermal treatment (followed by s/s of soils and incin. of PCB oil)

Soil and sludge combined (5,100 cy)

Organics (MBOCAs, 4, 4'Methylene, Bis-2-chloroaniline ) PCBs

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Weston Services, Inc PRP lead/Federal oversight; Connestoga-Ro vers Associates

Jim Hahnenberg 312-353-4213

Carter Industries*, MI (09/18/91)

Scrap metal salvager

Soil (20,000 cy) combined

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1994; Installation planned to begin Fall 1994

Jon Peterson 312-353-1264

A-66

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Duell-Gardner Landfill, MI (09/07/93)

Low temperature thermal treatment

Industrial landfill, Municipal landfill

Soil (1,800 cy)

SVOCs (Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)Phthalate), Biocides, PCBs VOCs, Biocides

Predesign

State lead/Fund Financed

Karla Johnson 312-886-5993

Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (09/27/93)

Thermal Desorption

Other inorganic chemical manufacturing

Soil (7,800 cy), Sediments (quantity unknown)

In design; Design completion planned Summer 1995 Completed; Operational from 9/93 to 3/94

Federal lead/Fund Financed; USACE (design)

Betty Lavis 312-886-4784

Pristine (ROD Amendment)*, OH (03/30/90) See also Soil vapor extraction Sherwood Medical, NE (09/28/93)

Thermal desorption Anaerobic thermal treatment Thermal Desorption

Industrial waste treatment facility

Soil (13,000 cy)

SVOCs (Pesticides, PAHs)

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Thomas Alcama 312-886-7278

Operating industrial facility

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (TCE, TCA, DCA, Vinyl Chloride)

Predesign

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Steve Auchterlonie 913-551-7778

Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace), CO (09/24/90) See also Soil vapor extraction

Low temperature thermal treatment (followed by s/s of soils and incin. of vapors) Low temperature thermal treatment

Aerospace equipment manufacturer - bulk storage facility

Soil (2,300 cy)

VOCs (TCE), PCBs

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1994

PRP lead/State oversight; under RCRA; Geraghty & Miller

George Dancik 303-293-1506 Charles Johnson (CO) 303-692-3348

Sand Creek Industrial, OU 5*, CO (09/28/90)

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage

Soil (9,500 cy)

Organics (Pesticides)

Operational; Completion planned Fall 1994

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Rust Remedial Services

Erna Acheson 303-294-1971

A-67

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

10 Harbor Island, WA (09/30/93) Thermal Desorption General industrial area Soil (91,000 cy) VOCs (TPH) Predesign; Negotiating consent decree agreement with PRP Federal lead/Fund Financed Keith Rose 206-553-7721

A-68

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Other
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

South Municipal Water Supply Well*, NH (09/27/89) See also Soil vapor extraction

Air sparging

Ball bearing manufacturing

Groundwater

VOCs (PCE,TCA,TCE)

Installed but not operational; operation to begin October 1994; completion planned 2011 Predesign; EPA negotiating with PRP

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Roger Duwart 617-573-9628 Tom Andrews (NH) 603-271-2910

Peterson/Puritan Inc. (OU 1), RI (09/30/93) See also Soil vapor extraction

In situ Oxidation

Custom manufacturing facility Industrial and commercial area

Soil (1,000 cy)

Metals (Arsenic)

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Dave Newton 617-573-9612 Leo Hellested (RI) 401-277-2797

Applied Environmental Services, OU 1, NY (06/24/91) See also Bioremediation (In Situ), Soil vapor extraction Brodhead Creek, OU 1, PA (03/29/91)

Air sparging

Bulk petroleum and hazardous waste storage facility, fuel blending

Groundwater

VOCs (BTEX), SVOCs, PAHs

Design completed but not installed

PRP lead/State oversight

Mel Hauptman 212-264-7681 John Grathwol (NY) 518-457-9280

CROW technology using hot water injection to mobilize coal tar

Coal gasification

Soil (9,000 cy) 25-35 ft deep, 100 ft by 80 ft

PAHs

Being installed; planned to be operational August 1994; completion planned January 1995

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Remediation Technologies, Western Research Institute

John Banks 215-597-8555

A-69

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Other (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

3 Brown's Battery Breaking Site, OU 2, PA (07/02/92) See also Other Technolgoies Limestone barrier Battery recycling/ disposal Groundwater Metals (Lead) Predesign; in negotiation PRP lead/Federal oversight Richard Watman 215-597-8996

Brown's Battery Breaking Site, OU 2, PA (07/02/92) See also Chemical Treatment Saegertown Industrial Area Site, PA (01/29/93) See also Soil vapor extraction

Fuming gasification

Battery recycling/ disposal

Soil and solids combined (45,000 cy)

Metals (Lead)

Predesign

PRP lead/Federal oversight; negotiations underway PRP lead/Federal oversight

Richard Watman 215-597-8996

Air sparging

Industrial park (Lord Corp. property)

Groundwater

VOCs (PCE, TCA)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1995

Steve Donohue 215-597-3166 Bob Kimball (PA) 814-332-6075

Tonolli Corporation, PA (09/30/92)

Limestone barrier

Battery recycling/ disposal

Groundwater

Metals (Lead)

Predesign; PD completion planned Summer 1994 Predesign; Design to be completed Winter 1994

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Linda Dietz 215-597-6906

Rochester Property, SC (08/31/93)

Air sparging

Disposal site

Groundwater

VOCs (TCE, bis (2-ethylhexyl phthalate))

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Sheri Panabaker 404-347-7791

A-70

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Other (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2*, OH (12/28/90) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ), Bioremediation (In Situ)

Land farming magnetically enhanced

Coke manufacturing

Soil (23,000 cy)

PAHs

In design; Operations to begin Spring 1995

PRP lead/Federal oversight; IT Corporation (Design), Black & Veetch (subcontractor) PRP lead/Federal oversight

Tom Alcamo 312-886-7278

Prewitt Abandoned Refinery, NM (09/30/92) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ), Soil vapor extraction Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc., OU 2, TX (09/06/91) See also Soil vapor extraction

Air sparging

Crude oil refinery

Groundwater

Organics (NAPLs)

Predesign

Monica Chapa-Smith 214-655-6780

Air sparging

Petroleum refining and reuse

Groundwater to a depth of 30 feet

VOCs (BTEX), SVOCs (Naphthalene)

Predesign; PD completion planned Summer 1995; pilot study planned Fall 1994 Predesign; PD completion planned Fall 1994 In design; Treatability studies/pilot test 5/94

PRP lead/Federal oversight

Chris Villareal 214-655-6758

Hexcel, CA (09/21/93) See also Bioremediation (In Situ), Soil vapor extraction Fairchild AFB, Priority 1 OU's (OU 2) FT-1, WA (07/14/93) See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Air sparging

Manufacturing

Groundwater

VOCs (PCE, Acetone, MEK, Benzene)

PRP lead/State oversight

Mark Johnson 510-286-0305

10

Air sparging

Fire training area

Groundwater

VOCs (Benzene)

Federal Facility, Air Force lead/Federal oversight

Carmela Grandinetti 206-553-8696

A-71

Table A-1 Remedial Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Other (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

10

Fort Lewis Military Res. Lf 4 & Sol. Refined Coal, WA (09/24/93) See also Soil Washing, Soil vapor extraction

Air sparging

Military municipal landfill

Groundwater

VOCs (PCE, TCE, DCE, Vinyl chloride)

In design; Pilot study in design

Federal facility, U.S. Army lead/Federal oversight

Bob Kievit 206-753-9014

A-72

REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR Table A-2 shows NPL sites at which established treatment technologies have been selected as part of the remedy. Established treatment technologies include: incineration, solidification/stabilization, and others. The sites are ordered by fiscal year to give some initial information on the status of implementation: in general, earlier RODs have progressed furthest in design and construction.

A-67 13

TABLE A-2 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR On-Site Incineration FY 85 85 85 85 REGION 2 2 5 6 SITE NAME Bog Creek Farm Bridgeport Rental & Oil ACME Solvent MOTCO STATE NJ NJ IL TX FY 88 88 On-Site Incineration (continued) REGION 7 8 SITE NAME Times Beach Broderick Wood Products

June 1994

STATE MO CO

86 86 86 86 86 86

1 4 5 5 5 6

Baird & McGuire Mowbray Engineering LaSalle Electrical Utilities Arrowhead Refinery Fields Brook Sikes Disposal Pit

MA AL IL MN OH TX

89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89

1 1 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5

87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87

1 1 4 4 5 5 6 6

Ottati & Goss Davis Liquid Waste Tower Chemical Geiger/C&M Oil Rose Township Dump Laskin/Poplar Oil Bayou Bonfouca Cleve Reber

NH RI FL SC MI OH LA LA

Baird and McGuire Wells G&H Bog Creek Farm De Rewal Chemical* Douglasville Disposal Smith's Farm Brooks* Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps/ Fairway Celanese* American Creosote Works Ninth Avenue Dump New Brighton/Arden Hills Big D Campground Laskin/Poplar Oil

MA MA NJ NJ PA KY NC NC TN IN MN OH OH

90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

1 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7

88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88

1 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6

Rose Disposal Pit Lipari Landfill Love Canal Delaware Sand & Gravel Southern Maryland Wood Treating Drake Chemical/Phase III Ordnance Works Disposal Zellwood Groundwater LaSalle Electrical Utilities Fort Wayne Reduction Forest Waste Products Pristine Summit National Liquid Disposal Old Midland Products Brio Refining

MA NJ NY DE MD PA WV FL IL IN MI OH OH AR TX

90

10

New Bedford* Sarney Farm M.W. Manufacturing* Sangamo/Crab Orchard* National Wildlife Refuge Fisher Calo Bofors Nobel Springfield Township Dump* Pristine (Amendment) University of Minnesota Vertac Texarkana Wood Preserving Missouri Electric Works Hastings Groundwater Contamination (East Industrial Park) FMC Yakima Pit

MA NY PA IL IN MI MI OH MN AR TX MO NE

WA

91

Whitmoyer Labs, Inc. OU3

PA

* Residuals to be treated with soldification/stabilization.

A-68

TABLE A-2 (continued) REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR On-Site Incineration (continued) FY 91 91 91 REGION 3 4 5 SITE NAME Eastern Diversified Metals Ciba Geigy Corp. Allied Chem & Ironton Coke STATE PA AL OH FY 86 Off-Site Incineration (continued) REGION 7 SITE NAME Ellisville Area/Bliss

June 1994

STATE MO

92 92 92

4 5 6

Alabama Army Ammunition Plant (Operable Unit 1) Savanna Army Depot Gulf Coast Vacuum Services (Operable Unit 1)

AL IL LA

87 87 87

2 4 6

Williams Property Sodyeco Sand Springs Petrochemical Complex

NJ NC OK

93 93 93 93 93

3 3 5 6 6

Seagertown Industrial Mathis Brothers Landfill (South Marble Top Road) MacGillis&Gibbs Bell Lumber & Pole American Cresote Works (Winnfield Plant) Vertac Off Site Incineration

PA GA MN LA AR

88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88

1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 5 6 7 7

Cannon Engineering/Plymouth Ewan Property Reich Farms Brewster Well Field Wildcat Landfill Berks Sand Pit Douglassville Disposal Fike Chemical Belvidere Municipal Landfill #1 S. Calvacade St. Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek (R&S) Syntex

MA NJ NJ NY DE PA PA WV IL TX MO MO

FY 84 84 84

REGION 5 5 10

SITE NAME Berlin & Farro Liquid Incineration Laskin/Poplar Oil Western Processing Phase I

STATE MI OH WA 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 1 1 1 2 3 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 8 W.R. Grace (Acton Plant) O'Connor Pinette's Salvage Yard Claremont Polychemical M.W. Manufacturing Whitmoyer Laboratories Newsom Brothers Old Reichold Cross Brothers Pail Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor Wedzeb Cliff/Dow Dump Alsco Anaconda United Creosoting Woodbury Chemical MA ME ME NY PA PA MS IL IL IN MI OH TX CO

85 85 85 85 86 86 86 86

2 5 6 8 3 3 5 5

Swope Oil & Chemical Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard Triangle Chemical Woodbury Chemical Drake Chemical/Phase II Westline Metamora Landfill Spiegelberg Landfill

NJ IL TX CO PA PA MI MI

* Residuals to be treated with soldification/stabilization.

A-69

TABLE A-2 (continued) REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR Off-Site Incineration (continued) FY REGION SITE NAME STATE FY 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Off-Site Incineration (continued) REGION 7 7 7 7 8 8 9 10 10 SITE NAME

June 1994

STATE IA MO MO MO CO UT CA WA WA

90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 6 6 6 6 7 7 8 8 8

Beacon Heights Landfill Kearsarge Metallurgical FAA Technical Center Hooker Chemical-Ruco Polymer Sayreville landfill Mattiace Petrochemicals Sealand Restoration Greenwood Chemical* Arkwood Jacksonville Municipal Landfill Rogers Road Municipal Landfill Hardage/Criner (Amendment) Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant Shenandoah Stables Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace) Sand Creek Industrial Ogden Defense Depot

CT NH NJ NJ NJ NY NY VA AR AR AR OK IA MO CO CO UT

Peoples Natural Gas Ellisville Area Site Ellisville Area (Amendment) Kem-Pest Laboratories Broderick Wood Products Hill AFB Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Commencement Bay - Nearshore/ Tideflats Northwest Transformer - Mission Pole

92 92 92 92 92 92

2 3 5 8 9 10 10

91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91

1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6

Union Chemical Curcio Scrap Metal Swope Oil Waldick Aerospace Devices, Inc. Circuitron Mattiace Petrochemical Brodhead Creek Eastern Diversified Metals Dixie Cavern County Landfill Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps (Amendment) Wrigley Charcoal Acme Solvent Reclaiming Inc. Main Street Wellfield Thermo Chem Carter Industries Summit National Liquid Disposal Service (Amendment) Petrochemical (Turtle-Bayou)

ME NJ NJ NJ NY NY PA PA VA NC TN IL IN MI MI OH TX

92

Ellis Property Fike Chemical American Chemical Services Ogden Defense Depot (Operable Unit 3) Westinghouse Electric (Sunnyvale Plant) Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling (Amendment) U.S. DOE Idaho National Engineering Lab (Operable Unit 23)

NJ WV IN UT CA ID ID

93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93

1 1 3 3 4 6 8 8 8 10 10

Davisville Naval Construction Battalion Center Pinettes Salvage Yard Hunterstown Road Pentokil Virginia Wood Preserving Koppers (Morrisville Plant) Vertac Montana Pole and Treating Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU29) Utah Power and Light/American Barrel Hanford 1100-Area (DOE) Harbor Island-Lead

RI ME PA VA NC AR MT CO UT WA WA

* Residuals to be treated with soldification/stabilization.

A-70

TABLE A-2 (continued) REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR Off-Site Incineration (continued) FY REGION SITE NAME STATE FY Off-Site Incineration (continued) REGION SITE NAME

June 1994

STATE

* Residuals to be treated with soldification/stabilization.

A-71

TABLE A-2 (continued) REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR Solidification/Stabilization FY 82 REGION 3 SITE NAME Bruin Lagoon STATE PA FY 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Solidification/Stabilization (continued) REGION 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 9 10 10 10 10 SITE NAME Alladin Plating Fike Chemical Brown Wood Preserving Flowood Chemtronics Velsicol Chemical Mid-State Disposal Landfill Industrial Waste Control Bailey Waste Disposal Brio Refining French Limited Midwest Manufacturing/ North Farm Selma Pressure Treating Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling Gould Commencement Bay/NTF Frontier Hard Chrome

June 1994

STATE PA WV FL MS NC IL WI AR TX TX TX IA CA ID OR WA WA

84

Bioecology Systems

TX

85 85 85

4 4 10

General Refining Davie Landfill Western Processing/Phase II

GA FL WA

86 86 86 86 86 86

2 3 4 4 5 5

Marathon Battery Bruin Lagoon Pepper's Steel & Alloy Sapp Battery Salvage Burrows Sanitation Forest Waste Products

NY PA FL FL MI MI

87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87

1 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 6

Davis Liquid Waste Chemical Control Myers Property Waldick Aerospace Gold Coast Geiger/C&M Oil Independent Nail Palmetto Wood Preserving Liquid Disposal Northern Engraving Gurley Pit Mid-South Wood Cleve Reber Sand Spring Petrochemical Complex

RI NJ NJ NJ FL SC SC SC MI WI AR AR LA OK

88 88 88 88

1 2 2 2

Charles George Land Reclamation Love Canal Marathon Battery York Oil

MA NY NY NY

89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89

1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 7

Sullivan's Ledge W.R. Grace (Acton Plant) O'Connor DeRewal Chemical Marathon Battery Craig Farm Douglassville Disposal Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard Ordnance Works Disposal Kassouf-Kimerling Battery Smith Farm Brooks Cape Fear Wood Preserving Celanese Amnicola Dump MIDCO I MIDCO II Auto Ion Chemicals Pesses Chemical Sheridan Disposal Services Vogel Paint & Wax

MA MA ME NJ NY PA PA PA WV FL KY NC NC TN IN IN MI TX TX IA

A-72

TABLE A-2 (continued) REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR Solidification/Stabilization (continued) FY 89 89 REGION 9 9 SITE NAME Koppers (Oroville Plant) Purity Oil Sales STATE CA CA FY 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Solidification/Stabilization (continued) REGION 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 7 7 7 8 9 9 SITE NAME

June 1994

STATE NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ DE MD PA PA PA PA PA VA VA AL GA KY SC NC NC TN TN TN IL MI NM IA IA IA MT CA CA

90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

1 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 10

New Bedford MA Roebling Steel NJ M.W. Manufacturing PA C&R Battery VA Greenwood Chemical VA 62nd Street Dump FL Cabot/Koppers FL Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving FL (Amendment) Kassourf-Kimerling Battery FL Disposal Schuylkill Metal FL Yellow Wate Road FL Zellwood Groundwater FL Contamination (Amendment) Sangamo/Crab Orchard IL National Wildlife Refuge Wayne Waste Oil IN Springfield Township Dump MI Oconomowoc Electroplating WI Jacksonville Municipal Landfill AR Rogers Road Municipal Landfill AR Shenandoah Stables MO Hastings Groundwater Contamination NE (East Industrial Park) Martin Marietta (Denver CO Aerospace) Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU 17) CO J.H. Baxter CA Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA) OR

Nascolite Corp. NL Industries Roebling Steel Waldick Aerospace Services Inc. White Chemical Corp. Halby Chemical Mid-Atlantic Wood Preservers Eastern Diversified Metals Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard Whitmoyer Lab (OU3) Whitmoyer Lab (OU2) U.S.A. Letterkenny SE First Piedmont Quarry 719 Saunders Supply Interstate Lead Co. USAF Robins Air Force Base Maxey Flats Nuclear Disposal Golden Strip Septic Tank Aberdeen Pesticide Dump (Amendment) Carolina Transformer Arlington Blending and Packaging Co. Oak Ridge OU3 Wrigley Charcoal Acme Solvents Carter Industries Cimarron Mining Corp. IE Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. Mid-America Tanning Shaw Avenue Dump Anaconda Co. Smelter FMC (Fresno Plant) Valley Wood Preserving

91 91 91 91

1 1 1 2

Silresin Chemical Sullivan's Ledge Union Chemical Asbestos Dump

MA MA MA NJ

92 92 92 92

1 2 2 2

PSC Resources Cosden Chemical Coatings Facet Enterprises Preferred Plating

MA NJ NY NY

A-73

TABLE A-2 (continued) REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR Solidification/Stabilization (continued) FY 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 REGION 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 9 10 10 10 SITE NAME STATE VA PA WV PA VA PA FL AL FL NC GA SC FL MI MI MI IL WI MI NM OK OK LA OK CO CO UT CO MT CA ID ID ID FY REGION FY Solidification/Stabilization (continued) REGION SITE NAME

June 1994

STATE

Abex C & D Recycling Fike Chemical Paoli Rail Yard Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump Tonolli Agrico Chemical Ciba-Geigy (McIntosh Plant) Florida Steel JFD Electronics/Channel Masters Marine Corps Logistics Base Savannah River (USDOE) (Operable Unit 1) Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits (Amendment) Electrovoice H. Brown Company Peerless Plating Savanna Army Depot Spickler Landfill Tar Lake Cal West Metals Double Eagle Refinery Fourth Street Abandoned Refinery Gulf Coast Vacuum Services (Operable Unit 1) Oklahoma Refining Broderick Wood Products Denver Radium (Operable Unit 8) Portland Cement (Kiln Dust #2 & #3) Rocky Flats (USDOE) (Operable Unit 4) Silver Bow CreekButte Area Rhone-Poulenc/Zoecon Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling (Amendment) U.S. DOE Idaho National Engineering Lab (Operable Unit 22)

93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93

1 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Salem Acres MA American Cyanamid NJ FMC-Dublin Road NY Hunterstown Road PA Rentokil Virginia Wood Preserving VA Anodyne FL Bypass 601 Groundwater NC Contamination Bypass 601 Groundwater NC Contamination (Amendment) Cedartown Industries GA Geiger (C&M Oil) (Amendment) SC Hercules 009 Landfill GA Kalama Specialty SC Peak Oil/Bay Drum (Operable Unit 1)FL Peak Oil/Bay Drum (Operable Unit 3)FL Reeves Southeastern Galvanizing FL (Operable Unit 1) Reilly Tar & Chemical FL (Indianapolis Plant) Pab Oil & Chemical Services LA Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits MO (USDOE) Rocky Mountain Arsenal (Operable CO Unit 28) Utah Power & Light/American Barrel UT McColl CA Sacramento Army Depot CA American Crossarm & Conduit WA Umatilla Army Depot (Operable Unit 1)OR

93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93

5 6 6 8 8 8 9 10 10

Other SITE NAME STATE TECHNOLOGY

A-74

TABLE A-2 (continued) REMEDIAL ACTIONS: ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY FISCAL YEAR Solidification/Stabilization (continued) FY 85 87 88 88 89 89 90 92 92 92 92 93 6 3 3 7 9 9 4 3 6 6 6 4 REGION SITE NAME TX WV PA KS CA CA KY WV OK OK OK SC STATE Soil Aeration In situ Flamming Soil Aeration Chemical Soil Aeration Soil Aeration Soil Aeration Neutralization Neutralization Neutralization Neutralization Soil Aeration FY Solidification/Stabilization (continued) REGION SITE NAME

June 1994

STATE

Triangle Chemical West Virginia Ordnance Bendix Flight System Arkansas City Dump Intel, Mountain View Raytheon, Mountain View Howe Valley Landfill Fike Chemical Double Eagle Refinery Fourth Street Abandoned Refinery Oklahoma Refining Kalama Specialty

A-75

TABLE B-1 REMOVAL ACTIONS: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY Table B-1 is the principal part of this chapter. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for removal sites for which innovative treatment technology has been selected. The columns of Table B-1 present the following information: Region This column indicates the EPA Region in which the site is located. Site Name, State, Action Memo Date This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which an innovative treatment technology was selected. An action memorandum documents the selection of remedy in the removal program. The date shown in this column is the date on which an action memorandum was signed by an EPA official. An asterisk (*) in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at the particular site. Specific Technology The second column describes the specific technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment. For example, within the general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase bioremediation may be chosen. Site Description This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the selection of innovative technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may determine the most frequently selected innovative technology for wood preserving sites. Media (quantity) This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ, an effort has been made to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another parameter significant to the application.

13 B-1
Table

TABLE B-1 (Continued) Key Contaminants Treated The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. There may be other contaminants as well that will be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but that are not being addressed by the listed technology, are not included. Status This column indicates the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the ROD has been signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially responsible parties, procuring the services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as conducting a treatability study) needed in the design stage. If a project is in design, the engineering documents needed to contract for and build the remedy are being prepared. If a remedy is being installed, the lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed to set up the remedy. The remedy is operational if it is completely installed and it is now being operated as a treatment system; the remedy is completed if the goals of the ROD or decision document for that treatment technology have been met and treatment has ceased. One purpose of this column is to identify opportunities for vendors to become involved in the next phase of the projects. Whenever possible, the season and year that the current phase will end is given. This information is identified as the completion planned date. Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor The lead indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially responsible parties will conduct the remedy with EPA/State oversight (PRP lead). If a remedy is Fund lead, EPA may manage the design/construction through its contractors, the state may manage the project with Superfund dollars, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) may act for EPA to manage the design or construction. Whichever agency or organization is responsible for managing the remedy, the contractor responsible for the actual installation and operation of the innovative technology also is identified, if the lead agency has selected a contractor. Contacts/Phone This final column provides the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name listed is usually the EPA on-scene coordinator (OSC) responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the state, the name and phone number of the state RPM also is provided. Information on any other useful contacts is provided.

B-2 14

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

GCL Tie and Treating, NY Emergency Response

Composting

Wood preserving

Soil (4,800 cy)

PAHs (Creosote)

In design; Pilot study completed in Jan 1994

Federal lead/Fund Financed; ERT/REAC

Joe Cosentino 908-906-6983 Carlos Ramos 212-264-5636

Southeastern Wood Preserving, MS Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 09/30/90) See also Soil Washing Indiana Wood Treating, IN Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 10/11/92)

Slurry phase (preceded by soil washing)

Wood preserving

Soil (12,000 cy)

PAHs (Creosote)

Completed; September 1994

Federal lead/Fund Financed; OHM Remediation Services Corp

Don Rigger 404-347-3931

Composting

Wood preserving

Soil (18,000 cy)

PAHs (Creosote)

Operational; Completion planned Fall 1994; After 6 months 8 of 9 compost piles below treatment target levels. Being installed; project completion date planned Fall 1995

Federal lead/Fund Financed; IT Corporation, CMC, Inc. subcontractor

Steve Faryan 312-353-9351

MacMillan Ring Free Oil Company*, AR Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 11/09/92)

Solid phase

Petroleum refining

Sediments (38,000 cy)

VOCs (BTEX), PAHs (DAF Float)

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Reidel Environmental Services Federal lead/Fund Financed; Remediation Technologies

Charles Fisher 214-655-2224

Scott Lumber, MO Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 07/10/87)

Land treatment

Wood preserving

Soil (16,000 cy)

SVOCs (Phenols, PAHs Benzo(a)pyrene)

Completed; Operational from 1987 to Fall 1991

Bruce Morrison 913-551-5014

B-3

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

9 Poly-Carb, NV Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 05/14/87) See also Soil Washing Land treatment Commercial waste management Soil (1,500 cy) SVOCs (Phenols), PAHs (Cresol) Completed; Operational from 7/87 to 8/88 Federal lead/Fund Financed; Reidel Environmental Services Bob Mandel 415-744-2290

B-4

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

CSX McCormick Derailment Site, SC Emergency Response See also Soil Vapor Extraction Baldwin Waste Oil, TX Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 07/01/92)

In situ groundwater

Derailment (30,000 gallon spill)

Groundwater down to 40 feet deep

VOCs (BETX)

Operational

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Kemron

Steve Spurlin 404-347-3931

In situ soil

Waste oil recycler

Soil (550 cy) down to 1 foot

VOCs (BTEX), PAHs (TPH)

Completed; September 1994

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Ecology & Environment, RSKERL (EPA), Reidel Environmental PRP lead/Federal oversight

Gary Guerra 214-665-6608

Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 07/31/84) See also Chemical Treatment Roseville Drums, CA Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 03/03/88)

In situ soil Preceded by chemical treatment

Drum storage/ disposal

Soil (3,200 cy)

Biocides (Toxaphene, Ethyl and Methyl Parathion)

Completed; Operational from 6/85 to 10/85

Richard Martin 414-744-2288

In situ soil

Midnight dump on dirt road

Soil (14 cy)

SVOCs (Dichlorobenzene, Phenols)

Completed; Fall 1988; Operational from 2/88 to 11/88

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Brad Shipley 415-744-2287

B-5

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Chemical Treatment
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Vineland Chemical, NJ Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 09/28/92)

Chemical Treatment

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage

Solids (100 lb)

Metals (Mercury)

Completed; December 1992; This portion of the site is completed. Remedial action for the whole site will be done by April 1994 Completed; Summer 1993; Operational from 2/93 to 6/93. Removal action completed. Other part going on. Completed; August 1991

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Ensco

Don Graham 908-321-4345 Steve Brawley (Ensco) 706-278-1195

Zschiegner Refining Company, NJ Emergency Response

Chemical Treatment

Precious metal recovery

Solids (100 lb)

Metals (Mercury)

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Ensco

Dilshad Perera 908-321-4356 Steve Brawley (Ensco) 706-278-1195

Avtex Fibers, VA Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 11/14/89)

Chemical Treatment

Rayon manufacturing facility/ wastewater treatment

Sludge (39,000 gl)

Organics (Carbon disulfide)

Federal lead/Fund Financed; OH Materials

Vincent Zenone 215-597-3038 Bonnie Gross 215-597-0491

PBM Enterprises (Van Dusen Airport Service), MI Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 04/10/88)

Oxidation Sodium Hypochlorite

Silver recovery facility

Solids Cyanide tainted X-ray chips

Organic cyanides

Completed; Operational from 5/85 to 10/85

Federal lead/Fund Financed; American Environmental Service, Inc.

Ross Powers 313-692-7661

B-6

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Chemical Treatment (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

8 Mouat Industries*, MT Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 09/20/91) Reduction using sulfuric acid and ferrous sulfate Metal ore mining and smelting Soil (47,000 cy) Metals (Chromium IV) Operational; Completion planned Spring 1994; Operation started June 1993 Completed; Operational from 4/85 to 10/85 PRP lead/Federal oversight; Baker Environmental Ron Bertran 406-449-5720

Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 07/31/84) See also Bioremediation (In Situ) Stanford Pesticide #1, AZ Emergency Response (Action Memo signed (04/20/87)

Reduction using sodium hydroxide

Drum storage/ disposal

Soil (3,200 cy)

Biocides (Toxaphene, Ethyl and Methyl Parathion)

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Richard Martin 414-744-2288

In situ

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage, Farm equipment storage

Soil (200 cy)

Biocides (Methyl Parathion)

Completed; Operational from 7/87 to 9/87

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Crosby and Overton

Dan Shane 415-744-2286

B-7

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Dechlorination
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Signo Trading/Mt. Vernon, NY Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 12/19/86)

Dechlorination

Waste management facility warehouse

Sludge (15 gl)

Dioxins (2,3,7,8 TCDD-laden herbicides)

Completed; Completed in 1987

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Galson Research Corp (subcontractor to OHM) Federal lead/Fund Financed

Charles Fitzsimmons 908-321-6608

Crown Plating, MO Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 08/29/89)

Dechlorination

Electroplating

Liquid (55 gl)

Biocides (silvex; 2,4,5 TP)

Completed; Operational from 10/89 to 12/89

Mark Roberts 913-236-3881

B-8

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 In situ Vitrification
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Parsons Chemical (ETM Enterprise), MI Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 09/21/90)

In situ Vitrification

Agricultural chemical facility

Soil (3,000 cy)

Biocides, Dioxins, Metals (Mercury)

Completed; First full-scale application of in situ vitrification at a hazardous waste site

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Geosafe Corp.

Len Zintak 312-886-4246

B-9

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Basket Creek Surface Impoundment*, GA Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 04/11/91) CSX McCormick Derailment Site, SC Emergency Response See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil vapor extraction ex situ, used on a soil pile

Surface impoundment used for disposal of solvents

Soil (2,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, PCE, MEK, MIBK, Toluene, Xylene, Benzene)

Completed

Federal lead/Fund Financed; OHM

Don Rigger 404-347-3931 Extn-6140

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

Derailment (30,000 gallon spill)

Soil (200,000 cy) down to 8 feet deep

VOCs (BETX)

Completed; Operation completed Winter 1993

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Midwest Research Institute Federal lead/Fund Financed; OH Materials

Steve Spurlin 404-347-3931

Hinson Chemical, SC Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 11/28/88)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

Waste reclaiming facility

Soil (60,000 cy) to a depth of 50 feet

VOCs

Completed; March 1992; Operational from 12/88 to 3/92 Operational

Fred Stroud 404-347-3136

Mystery Bridge Road/Highway 20, OU 2*, WY Emergency Response (Action Memo signed See also Other Technologies

Soil vapor Extraction

Natural gas compressor station

Soil (160,000 cy) approximately 5 acres down to 20 feet

VOCs (Benzene)

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Adrian Brown Consultants

Lisa Reed 303-293-1515

B-10

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Washing
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Southeastern Wood Preserving, MS Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 09/30/90) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Poly-Carb, NV Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 05/14/87) See also Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Soil washing (sand removal, followed by bioremediation of fines

Wood preserving

Sludge (quantity unknown), Solids (1,000 cy)

SVOCs, PAHs (Creosote)

Operational; Completion planned Spring 1994

Federal lead/Fund Financed; OHM Remediation Services Corp.

Don Rigger 404-347-3931

Soil Washing

Commercial waste management

Soil (1,500 cy)

SVOCs (Phenols), PAHs (Cresol)

Completed; Operational 7/87 to 8/88

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Reidel Environmental Services

Bob Mandel 415-744-2290

B-11

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Thermal Desorption
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

FCX-Washington Site, NC Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 12/04/91) Drexler - RAMCOR*, WA Emergency Response (Action Memo signed 09/30/91)

Thermal Desorption

Pesticide manufacturing/use/ storage

Soil (15,000 cy)

Biocides (Chlordane, Methoxyclor, DDT, DDE)

Being installed

Federal lead/Fund Financed

Paul Peronard 404-347-6121

10

Thermal Desorption

Waste oil recycler

Soil (3,000 cy)

VOCs (BTEX), PAHs (Petroleum hydrocarbons)

Completed; Operational from 7/92 to 8/92

Federal lead/Fund Financed; Four Seasons

Chris Field 206-553-1674

B-12

Table B-1 Removal Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Other
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Mystery Bridge Road/Highway 20, OU 2*, WY Emergency Response See also Soil Vapor Extraction

Air sparging

Natural gas compressor station

Soil (160,000 cy)

VOCs (Benzene)

Operational

PRP lead/Federal oversight; Adrian Brown Consultants

Lisa Reed 303-293-1515

B-13

TABLE C-1 OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY Table C-1 is the principal part of this chapter. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for removal sites for which an innovative treatment technology has been selected. The columns of Table C-1 present the following information: Region This column indicates the EPA Region in which the site is located. Site Name, State This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which an innovative treatment technology was selected. An asterisk (*) in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at the particular site. Specific Technology The second column describes the specific technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment. For example, within the general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase bioremediation may be chosen. Site Description This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the selection of innovative technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may determine the most frequently selected innovative technology for wood preserving sites. Media (quantity) This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ, an effort has been made to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another important parameter regarding the application.
12 C-1

TABLE C-1 (Continued) Key Contaminants Treated The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. There may be other contaminants as well that will be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but that are not being addressed by the listed technology, are not included. Status This column gives the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the ROD has been signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially responsible parties, procuring the services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as conducting a treatability study) needed in the design stage. If a project is in design, the engineering documents needed to contract for and build the remedy are being prepared. If a remedy is being installed, the lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed to set up the remedy. The remedy is operational if it is complete and it is now being operated as a treatment system; the remedy is completed if the goals of the ROD or decision document for that treatment technology have been met and treatment has ceased. One purpose of this column is to identify opportunities for vendors to become involved in the next phase of the projects. Whenever possible, the season and year that the current phase will end is given. This information is identified as the completion planned date. Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor The lead indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially responsible parties will conduct the remedy with EPA/State oversight (PRP lead). If a remedy is Fund lead, EPA may manage the design/ construction through its contractors, the state may manage the project with Superfund dollars, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) may act for EPA to manage the design or construction. Whichever agency or organization is responsible for managing the remedy, the contractor responsible for the actual installation and operation of the innovative technology also is identified, if the lead agency has selected a contractor. Contacts/Phone This final column gives the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name listed is usually the project manager or point of contact responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the state, the name and phone number of the state project manager also is provided. Information on any other useful contacts is provided.
C-2 13

Table C-1 Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Matagorda Island AF Range, TX

Solid phase

Federal facility

Soil (500 cy)

VOCs (BTEX), PAHs (TPH, Tar)

Completed; Operational from 10/92 to 3/93

Army (USACE)/DoD Financed - IRP Program; CCC, Inc.

Jack Otis 409-766-3161 Domingo Galindo (USACE) 512-884-3385

Former Glasgow AFB, MT

Land treatment

UST removal site

Soil (2,000 cy)

VOCs, PAHs (Petroleum hydrocarbons)

Being installed; Installation completion planned Fall 1994; Design Completed. Expected construction completion date Fall 1994 Completed; Winter 1991

ARMY (USACE)/DoD Financed FUDS Program

Martin Rasmussen (USACE, Omaha) 402-221-3827 Steve Ott (USACE, Omaha) 402-221-7670

Ft. Ord Marina, Fritzche AAF Fire Drill Area, CA

Land treatment

Fire drill area

Soil (4,000 cy)

VOCs (TCE, MEK), PAHs (Petroleum hydrocarbons) PAHs (Petroleum hydrocarbons, Diesel)

Army (USACE)/DoD Financed - IRP Program State Lead/Western Division of NFEC; ENSR

Gail Youngblood 408-242-8017

Marine Corps., Mountain Warfare Center, Bridgeport, CA

Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Heap pile bioreactor with aeration and irrigation

Federal facility

Soil (7,000 cy)

Completed; 1989; Pilot-scale project

Bill Major 805-982-1808

C-3

Region

Site Name, State, (ROD Date)

Specific Technology

Site Description

Media (Quantity)

Key Contaminants Treated

Status#

Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

Contacts/Phone

10 Ft. Wainwright*, AK Land treatment Biopile Federal facility, fuel pipeline, aboveground storage tank Soil (4,500 cy) PAHs (Diesel) Operational Army (USACE)/DoD Financed - IRP Program; Laidlaw Diane Soderland 907-271-5083 David Williams (USACE) 907-753-5657

C-4

Table C-1 Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Savannah River DOE, M Area Settling Basin, SC See also Soil Vapor Extraction, Other Technologies

In situ groundwater

Leaking solvent line

Groundwater

VOCs (TCE, PCE), PAHs ((DNAPLs))

Operational; Operation began in 1990

DOE Lead/DOE funding; Westinghouse Savannah River Company

Nate Ellis (DOE) 803-952-4846 Brian Lowry (WSRC) 803-725-5181

Kelly AFB, Site 1100*, TX See also Soil Vapor Extraction

In situ soil Bioventing

Federal facility (hazardous waste facility)

Soil (8,900 cy)

VOCs (JP-4)

Operational; Completion planned 1994; full scale since 1993; completion in 2 years Operational; completion date unknown

Kelly AFB/Air Force Funded; SAIC

Steve Escude 210-925-1812

Ft. Carson*, CO See also Soil Vapor Extraction

In situ soil Bioventing

UST remediation

Soil down to 80 feet

VOCs (gasoline)

Army (USACE)/DoD Financed - IRP; Woodward Clyde Army (USACE)/DoD Financed FUDS Program

John Cloonan (USACE) 719-526-8004

Aua Fuel Farm, Aua Village, American Samoa,

Bioremediation (In Situ)

Fuel farm

Soil (quantity unknown)

PAHs (Diesel fuel)

Operational; Completion expected for Spring 1996

Helene Takemoto (USACE, pac div) 808-438-6931/ 1776

Davis Monthan AFB, AZ See also Soil Vapor Extraction

In situ soil

Federal facility JP-4 Pump House

Soil (440 cy) 400 ft by 15 ft down to 2 ft deep

PAHs (Petroleum hydrocarbons)

Completed; Operational from 7/91 to 3/92

USACE/Air Force

Mike Steffansmeyer (USACE, Omaha) 402-221-7163

C-5

Table C-1 Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Bioremediation (In situ) (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

9 Davis Monthan AFB, Site 35, AZ See also Soil Vapor Extraction In situ soil Bioventing JP-4 pump house Soil (63,000 cy) VOCs (JP-4), PAHs Being installed; Pilot test Winter 1994 USACE/ Air Force Funded (State Oversite); Engineering Science Mike Steffanmeyer (USACE, Omaha) 402-221-7163 Karen Odom (USAF) 602-750-5595 Doug Dowrey (ES) 303-831-8100

Seal Beach Navy Weapons Station IR Site 14, CA See also Soil Vapor Extraction

Anaerobic

Federal facility Naval weapons station

Soil (1,700 cy) 100 yd diameter down to 6 feet deep

VOCs (BTEX), PAHs (Petroleum hydrocarbons)

Operational; Operations started in 1989

Navy/DoD Financed - IRP Program; Naval Facility Engineering Center (Stanford Univ.) Naval Civil Engineering Lab/DoD Federal; Polybac

Laura Duchnak (Navy RPM) 619-532-3152 Steve McDonald (Navy) 310-594-7655

11

Naval Communication Station, Scotland,

In situ soil

Diesel fuel storage tanks and piping

Soil apprx.8,608 square feet (800 sq meters)

SVOCs (No.2 Diesel)

Completed; Fall 1985

Deh Bin Chan 805-982-4191

C-6

Table C-1 Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Dechlorination
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

U. S. Public Works Center, Guam, GU

Dechlorination

Federal facility

Soil (5,500 cy) tons

PCBs

Operational; Completion planned Summer 1995

Navy; Guam EPA Oversite; IT Corp

D. B. Chan (Navy) 805-982-4191

C-7

Table C-1 Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Langley AFB, IRP Site 28, VA

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing

Federal facility

Soil 1.5 acres down to 5feet deep

VOCs (Gasoline)

Being installed; Installation completion planned Summer 1994

USACE/Air Force Funded

John Farhat (USACE, Omaha) 402-221-7654 Dan Musel (Langley AFB) 804-764-3987

Savannah River DOE, M Area Settling Basin, SC See also Bioremediation (In Situ), Other Technologies

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing with groundwater sparging

Leaking solvent line

Soil (450,000 lb), Groundwater down to 200 feet

VOCs (TCE, PCE)

Operational; Operation of the SVE system began in 1990

DOE Lead/DOE Funding; Westinghouse Savannah River Company

Nate Ellis (DOE) 803-952-4846 Brian Looney (WSRC) 803-725-5181

Holloman AFB, BX Service Station, NM

Soil vapor extraction may supplement with air injection

Service station (SS 17)

Soil 2 to 3 acres down to 10 feet

VOCs (Benzene), PAHs (Petroleum Hydrocarbons)

In design; Design completion planned Winter 1993; Currently conducting pilot test. In design; Design completed; Installation and remedation to start in Spring 1994.

USACE/Air Force IRP Program; Ensearch Environmental, Walk Haydel & Associates Sub USACE/Air Force IRP Program; IT

Ron Stirling (USACE) 402-221-7664

Holloman AFB, Main POL Area, NM

Soil vapor extraction Using passive vent and extraction wells.

Former above ground fuel storage tank area (JP-4 and AV Gas spill) (SS-02/05)

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (Benzene), PAHs (Petroleum Hydrocarbons)

Ron Stirling (USACE) 402-221-7664

C-8

Table C-1 Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

6 Kelly AFB, Site 1100*, TX See also Bioremediation (In Situ) Soil Vapor Extraction Federal facility (hazardous waste facility) Soil (8,900 cy) VOCs (JP-4) Operational; Vacuum extraction done before with bioventing, information the same. Completion in 2 years. Operational; completion date unknown Kelly AFB/Air Force Funded; SAIC Steve Escude 210-925-1812

Ft. Carson*, CO See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil Vapor Extraction

UST remediation

Soil down to 80 feet

VOCs (gasoline)

Army (USACE)/DoD Financed - IRP; Woodward Clyde USACE/Air Force Funded; Montgomery Watson - Design Contractor

John Cloonan 719-526-8004

Davis Monthan AFB, AZ See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil vapor extraction with bioventing

Federal facility JP-4 Pump House

Soil (63,000 cy)

VOCs (JP-4, Benzene)

In design; Design completion planned Fall 1993; Completion delayed because awaiting funding In design; Design completion planned Fall 1993

Mike Steffansmeier, USACE Omaha 402-221-7163 Karen Odom Air Force 602-750-5595

Davis Monthan AFB, Site 35, AZ See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil vapor extraction with bioventing

JP-4 pump house

Soil (63,000 cy)

VOCs (JP-4, Benzene)

USACE/Air Force Funded; Montgomery Watson - Design Contractor

Mike Steffansmeier (USACE, Omaha) 402-221-7163

C-9

Table C-1 Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Vapor Extraction (continued)
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

9 Luke AFB, AZ Soil vapor extraction with air flushing and thermal oxidation of off gases Air Force fire training pits Soil (35,000 cy) VOCs (2-hexanone, 2-butanone, 4-methyl 2-pentanone, BTEX) Completed; Operational from 11/91 to 5/92. Will conduct long-term monitoring afterward Operational; Completion planned Winter 1994; 5 years to complete. USACE Lead/State Oversight; Envirocon Jerome Stolinsky (USACE) 402-221-7170 Dan McCafferty (Envirocon) 406-523-1150

McClellan AFB OUD, CA

Soil Vapor Extraction

Former fuel and solvent disposal site

Soil (12,000 cy)

VOCs (TCA, TCE, 1-1-DCE)

Air Force; CH2M Hill

Steve Hodge (McClellan AFB) 916-643-0830 Elaine Anderson (McClellan AFB) 916-643-0830 Joseph Danko (CH2M Hill) 503-752-4271

Seal Beach Navy Weapons Station IR Site 14, CA See also Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil vapor extraction with combustion of air emissions

Federal facility Naval weapons station

Soil (quantity unknown)

VOCs (BTEX)

In design; Operation to start in 1994

Navy/DoD Financed - IRP Program; Jacobs Engineering

Jeff Kidwell (Navy) 619-532-2058 Steve McDonald (Navy) 310-594-7655

C-10

Table C-1 Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Soil Washing
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Saginaw Bay Confined Disposal Facility, MI

Soil Washing

Confined disposal island

Sediments (150 cy)

PCBs

Completed; Summer 92

COE lead/Federal Oversite; Bergmann, USA

Jim Galloway (COE) 313-226-6760 Rick Traver (Bergmann) 203-684-6844

Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, MN

Soil Washing

Munitions manufacturing/ storage

Soil (quantity unknown)

Metals (Lead, Mercury)

Operational; Completion planned Summer 1994

Federal Facility/State oversight; Wenck Associates, Inc.

Peter Rissel (US Army Env. Center) 410-671-1504 Martin McCleery (Twin Cities AAP)

C-11

Table C-1 Other Federal Program Actions: Site-specific Information By Technology Through FY 1993 Other
Region Site Name, State, (ROD Date) Specific Technology Site Description Media (Quantity) Key Contaminants Treated Status# Lead Agency and Treatment Contractor (if available)

June 1994

Contacts/Phone

Savannah River DOE, M Area Settling Basin, SC See also Bioremediation (In Situ), Soil Vapor Extraction

air sparging

Leaking solvent line

Groundwater

VOCs (TCE, PCE)

Operational; Operational since 1990

DOE lead/DOE funding; Westinghouse Savannah River Company

Nate Ellis (DOE) 803-952-4846 Brian Lowry (WSRC) 803-725-5181

C-12

Appendix D Updates/Changes/Deletions

Summary of Updates/Changes/Deletions Each edition of this report has added new information on the applications of innovative technologies at Superfund sites and has updated the status of existing innovative projects. The information added from ROD's from previous fiscal years that was deleted, or changed in each edition (from the first edition of the report published in January 1991 through this 5th edition) is described below to allow tracking of specific projects from edition to edition. Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 1st edition report (January 1991) to the 2nd edition report (September 1991).
2nd Edition Region 3 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Leetown Pesticides, WV (03/31/86) Technology (Listed in 1st Edition) Bioremediation Added Deleted Yes Changed to No further action. Risk reevaluated and was determined that risk was not sufficient for remedial action. During remedial design, sampling indicated VOCs were no longer present in the soils. Heavy metals remained at the surface. An ESD was issued on 12/92. Remedy will consist of capping the site. Misinterpretation of ROD during ROD analysis Comments Contacts/Phone Andy Palestini 215-597-1286 Philip Rotstein 215-597-9023 Kate Lose 215-597-0910

Harvey-Knott Drum, DE (09/30/85)

In Situ Soil Flushing

Yes

SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY (09/29/89)

Thermal Desorption

Yes (changed to soil vapor extraction in 3rd edition)

Miko Fayon 212-264-4706

1 2 6 10

Re-Solve, MA (09/24/87) GE Wiring Services, PR (09/30/88)

Chemical Treatment Chemical Extraction

Dechlorination Reclassified technology Soil Washing Reclassified technology

Lorenzo Thantu 617-223-5500 Caroline Kwan 212-264-0151 John Meyer 214-655-6735 Christine Psyk 206-553-6519

Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers, TX Chemical Treatment (03/25/88) Northwest Transformer, WA (09/15/89) In Situ Vitrification Yes

Dechlorination Reclassified technology Technology dropped because commercial availability was delayed

Note:

The 2nd edition report also added information on 45 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1990 RODs and 18 innovative treatment technologies used in removal actions. D-1

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 2nd edition report (September 1991) to the 3rd edition report (April 1992).
3rd Edition Region 2 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Marathon Battery, NY (09/30/88) Technology (Listed in 2nd Edition) Thermal Desorption Added Deleted Yes Changed to During design soil gas concentration at hot spots was below NY state standards. GW monitoring will continue. Incorrectly classified. Actually conducting pump and treat with treated water being reinjected Thermal Desorption Yes Yes Incineration Possible pre-wash of debris with surfactants Problems due to the presence of furans. Incineration likely Comments Contacts/Phone Pam Tames 212-264-1036

Goose Farm, NJ (09/27/85)

In Situ Soil Flushing

Yes

Laura Lombardo 212-264-6989 Caroline Kwan 212-264-0151 Tony Best 404-347-2643

2 4 5

GE Wiring Services, PR (09/30/88)

Soil Washing

Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving, FL Soil Washing (09/26/90) Sangamo/Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge, IL (08/01/90) Anderson Development, MI (09/28/90) In Situ Vitrification

ROD specified the remedy as in situ Nan Gowda vitrification or incineration. 312-353-9236 Incineration was chosen Because of concern by the community the remedy was changed. ROD amendment signed 9/30/91, and ESD was signed 10/2/92 Cleanup levels reached by natural attenuation Jim Hahnenberg 312-353-4213

In Situ Vitrification

Thermal Desorption

5 6 6

U.S. Aviex, MI (09/07/88) Atchison/Santa Fe/Clovis, NM (09/23/88) Crystal Chemical, TX (09/27/90)

In Situ Flushing Bioremediation (ex situ) In Situ Vitrification

Yes Yes Yes

Robert Whippo 312-886-4759 Ky Nichols 214-655-6783

Remedy reconsidered after delay in commercial availability of technology. Vitrification considered for hot spots only. Revised remedy will consist of capping and off-site disposal/consolidation of soils. ROD was misinterpreted during ROD analysis

Lisa Price 214-655-6735

Solvent Service, CA (09/27/90)

Bioremediation (in situ)

Yes

Kevin Graves 510-286-0435 Steve Morse (CA) 570-286-0304

Note:

The 3rd edition report also added information on 70 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1991 RODs. D-2

3rd Edition Region 9 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Poly Carb, NV (Removal) Technology (Listed in 2nd Edition) Bioremediation (ex situ) Added Deleted Changed to Bioremediation (in situ)

Comments Contacts/Phone Reclassified technology Bob Mandel 415-744-2290

D-3

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 3rd edition report (April 1992) to the 4th edition report (October 1992).
4th Edition Region 2 2 5 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Lipari Landfill Marsh Sediment, NJ (07/11/88) GE Wiring Services PR (09/30/88) University of Minnesota, MN (06/11/90) Technology (Listed in 3rd Edition) None Thermal Desorption Thermal Desorption Yes Added Thermal Desorption Soil Washing Incineration in 5th edition Issued an ESD in August 1991 to change remedy to Thermal Desorption or Incineration. Incineration was chosen because it was less expensive Deleted Changed to Missed during original ROD analysis Comments Contacts/Phone Tom Graff 816-426-2296 Caroline Kwan 212-264-0151 Darrel Owens 312-886-7089

6 6 9 9 10

Sol Lynn/Industrial Dechlorination Transformers, TX (03/25/88) Koppers/Texarkana, TX (09/23/88) Poly Carb, NV (Removal) Teledyne Semiconductors, CA (03/22/91) Gould Battery (03/31/88)

Dechlorination Soil Washing Bioremediation (in situ) Soil Vapor Extraction Soil Washing Soil Washing In Situ Flushing

Yes

Discontinued due to implementation John Meyer difficulties 214-655-6735 Remedy added by ROD amendment Ursula Lennox 214-655-6735 Bioremediation (ex situ) Reclassified technology Mistakenly deleted from report Missed during original ROD analysis Bob Mandel 415-744-2290 Sean Hogan 415-744-2233 Chip Humphries 503-326-2678

Yes

Note:

The 4th edition report also added information on 10 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial action in FY 1992 RODs, and 21 innovative treatment technologies at non-Superfund sites.

D-4

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993).
5th Edition Region 1 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Re-Solve, MA (09/24/87) Technology Listed in 4th Edition Dechlorination Added Deleted Yes Changed to Comments Contacts/Phone Pilot study showed that Joe Lemay dechlorination increased the volume 617-573-9622 and that the waste still needed to be incinerated. An ESD to incinerate residuals off-site is in peer review. Will incinerate off-site Remedy involves pump and treat with on-site discharge. Soil is not being targeted. Remedy involves pump and treat with on-site discharge. Soil is not being targeted. Remedy involves pump and treat with on-site discharge. Soil is not being targeted. Thermal desorption not needed because highly contaminated soil will be incinerated off-site instead. Remainder will be stabilized. ESD issued. Will conduct ex situ passive volatilization Ross Gilleland 617-573-5766 Jeff Gratz 212-264-6667 Jeff Gratz 212-264-6667 Jeff Gratz 212-264-6667 Ed Finnerty 212-264-3555

1 2

Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (05/30/89) Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 1, NJ (02/04/91) Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 2, NJ (02/04/91) Naval Air Warfare Center, OU 4, NJ (02/04/91) Caldwell Trucking, NJ (09/25/86)

Solvent Extraction In Situ Flushing

Yes Yes

In Situ Flushing

Yes

In Situ Flushing

Yes

Thermal Desorption

Yes

Tobylanna Army Depot, PA (Non-Superfund project)

Bioremediation (in situ)

Yes

Drew Lausch 215-597-3161 Ross Mantione (Tobyhanna) 717-894-6494 Tony DeAngelo 404-347-7791

Smith's Farm Brooks (09/30/91)

Dechlorination

Thermal Desorption

Will alter chemistry to achieve dechlorination during thermal desorption.

Note:

The 5th edition report also adds information on 49 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1992 RODs, and 15 innovative treatment technologies used in removal actions. D-5

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993). (continued)
5th Edition Region 4 Site Name, State (ROD Date) American Creosote Works, FL (09/28/89) Technology Listed in 4th Edition Soil Washing Added Deleted Yes Changed to Bench-scale study of soil washing showed that the concentrations of carcinogenic PAHs were not adequately reduced. Also discovered dioxins at much higher concentrations Bench-scale study of bioremediation (ex situ) showed that the concentrations of carcinogenic PAHs were not adequately reduced. Also discovered dioxins at much higher concentrations Comments Contacts/Phone Mark Fite 404-347-2643

American Creosote Works, FL (09/28/89)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Yes

Mark Fite 404-347-2643

4 5

Hollingsworth Solderless, FL (04/10/86) Cliffs/Dow Dump, MI (09/27/89)

None Bioremediation (In Situ)

Soil Vapor Extraction Yes

Listed as soil aeration in 3rd edition John Zimmerman 404-347-2643 Bioremediation (in situ) was a Ken Glatz misinterpretation of the ROD. All 312-886-1434 soil will be excavated and treated by bioremediation (ex situ). Remedy has been suspended Mike Overbay because of implementation 214-655-8512 difficulties and escalating cost. Cost doubled from cost projected in ROD. Issuing ROD amendment to cap in place. Pilot study showed in situ bioremediation was too costly. It appears that the present pump and treat system will be able to achieve cleanup levels. Thermal Desorption Soil washing did not meet performance standards and was expensive. ROD amendment issued early September 1993. Bruce Morrison 913-551-7755

Tenth Street Dump/Junkyard, OK (09/27/90)

Dechlorination

Yes

Fairfield Coal & Gas, IA (09/21/90)

Bioremediation (in situ)

Yes

Sand Creek Industrial OU 5, CO (09/28/90)

Soil Washing

Erna Acheson 303-294-1971

D-6

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 4th edition report (October 1992) to the 5th edition report (September 1993). (continued)
5th Edition Region 9 9 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Koppers Company (Oroville), CA (04/04/90) Signetics (AMD 901) TRW OU, CA (09/11/91) Technology Listed in 4th Edition Bioremediation (Ex Situ) None Soil Vapor Extraction Added Deleted Yes Changed to Misinterpretation of ROD during ROD analysis Remedy added Comments Contacts/Phone Fred Schlauffler 415-744-2365 Joe Healy 415-744-2331 Kevin Graves (CA) 510-286-0435 Sean Hogan 415-744-2233 Linda Meyer 206-553-6636 Nolan Jenson (DOE) 208-526-0436 Linda Meyer 206-553-6636 Nolan Jenson (DOE) 208-526-0436

9 10

Teledyne Semiconductors, CA (09/30/91) IDEL Warm Waste Pond, ID (12/05/91)

None Acid Extraction

Soil Vapor Extraction Yes

Dropped by mistake from 4th edition Treatability study of acid extraction did not achieve good extraction rates. Did not reduce the volume of waste. Will excavate, consolidate and cap. Treatability study of soil washing did not achieve results. Did not reduce the volume of waste. Will excavate, consolidate and cap.

10

IDEL Warm Waste Pond, ID (12/05/93)

Soil Washing

Yes

D-7

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994).
6th Edition Region 1 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Union Chemical Co., OU 1, ME (12/27/90) Technology Listed in 5th Edition Thermal Desorption Added Deleted Changed to Soil Vapor Extraction Determined that SVE would be more cost effective. ESD signed March/April 1994. Comments Contacts/Phone Terry Connelly 617-573-9638 Christopher Rushton (ME DEP) 207-287-2651 Darryl Luce 617-573-5767 Mike Robinette (NH) 603-271-2014 Kim O'Connell 212-264-8127 (temporary)

Tibbetts Road, NH (09/29/92)

In Situ Soil Flushing

Yes

Misinterpretation of ROD during ROD analysis. Soil was not targeted for treatment. Re-evaluation of site found significantly less contaminated soil than original estimates. Soil will be disposed off site. ESD signed July 1994. Misinterpretation of the ROD during ROD analysis.

Ewan Property, OU2, NJ (09/29/89)

Soil Washing, Solvent Extraction

Yes

Naval Air Engineering Center, OU 7, Interim Action, NJ (03/16/92)

In Situ Flushing

Yes

Jeff Gratz 212-264-6667 Robert Wing 212-264-8670

Solvent Savers, NY (09/30/90)

Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

SVE is a secondary remedy which Lisa Wong may be used instead of thermal 212-264-9348 desorption, the primary remedy, if treatability studies show to be effective. Neutralization with lime (Ex Situ) Treatability studies indicated that the technology was not feasible. ESD under preparation. Facility no longer in operation. Can now excavate. Remedies being considered include thermal desorption. Vance Evans 215-597-8485 Jeff Howard (VA) 804-762-4203 Andy Palestini 215-597-1286

U.S. Titanium, VA (11/21/89)

In Situ Flushing

L.A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soils), VA (03/31/88)

Bioremediation (In Situ)

Yes

Note:

The 6th edition report also adds information on 53 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs. D-8

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
6th Edition Region 3 Site Name, State (ROD Date) L.A. Clarke & Sons, OU 1 (Soils), VA (03/31/88) Technology Listed in 5th Edition In Situ Flushing Added Deleted Yes Changed to Facility no longer in operation. Can now excavate. Remedies being considered include thermal desorption. Re-use as fuel off-site Technology changed because of uncertainty about the ability of bioremediation to reach treatment goals. ESD signed 3/94. Only conducted air injection to facilitate pump and treat. Vapors were not extracted. Further investigation revealed that the Vadose Zone was not an area of concern. Groundwater not being treated. Only soil is being treated. Land Treatment Land treatment determined to be more cost effective. Yes Treatability study indicated that the technology could not treat the contaminants of concern because of materials problems. Will excavate and dispose off-site. ROD Amendment signed 3/94. Waste will be disposed off-site more cost effectively Another disposal method likely to be used. Comments Contacts/Phone Andy Palestini 215-597-1286

L.A. Clarke & Sons, Lagoon Sludge OU, VA (03/31/88)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Andy Palestini 215-597-1286

Henderson Road, PA (06/30/88)

Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Joe McDowell 215-597-8240

Cabot Carbon/Koppers (Groundwater), FL (09/27/90) Benfield Industries, NC (07/31/92)

Bioremediation (In Situ Groundwater) Soil Washing Bioremediation Slurry phase Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Yes

Patsy Goldberg 404-347-6265 Jon Bornholm 404-347-7791 Geizelle Bennett 404-347-7791 David Lown (NC) 919-733-2801

Charles Macon Lagoon, Lagoon #10, NC (09/31/91)

Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (09/30/87)

Chemical Treatment

Yes

Al Cherry (404) 342-7791 Derek Matory 404-347-7791

Arlington Blending & Packaging Co., Dechlorination OU1, TN (06/28/91)

Yes

Note:

The 6th edition report also adds information on 53 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs. D-9

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
6th Edition Region 5 Site Name, State (ROD Date) South Andover Salvage Yard, OU 2, MN (12/24/91) Technology Listed in 5th Edition Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Added Deleted Yes Changed to Thermal Treatment Technology changed to off-site thermal treatment (either thermal desorption or incineration) because of reduced volume of contamination found during RD investigations. ROD amendment signed 5/31/94. Adding technology to treat more highly contaminated soil. Adding technology to treat more highly contaminated soil. Comments Contacts/Phone Bruce Sypniewski 312-886-6189

Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2, OH (12/28/90) Allied Chem & Ironton Coke, OU 2, OH (12/28/90)

Bioremediation (In Situ) Bioremediation (In Situ)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ) (Land Farming) Bioremediation (Ex Situ) Magnetically Enhanced Land Farming Yes

Tom Alcamo 312-886-7278 Tom Alcamo 312-886-7278

United Scrap Lead/SIA, OH (09/30/88)

Soil Washing

Determined to be too expensive. Anita Boseman Other alternatives being evaluated. 312-886-6941 ROD Amendment planned. Timothy Hull (OH) 513-285-6357 Incineration on-site Incineration was contingency Daryl Owens remedy in ROD. State had 312-886-7089 concerns about effective means of soil washing and cost of incineration has decreased; ESD will be signed Fall 1994. Dechlorination not being pursued because of cost considerations. Groundwater remediation not planned for this area. Gregory Fife 214-655-6773 Ron Stirling (USACE) 402-221-7664

MacGillis and Gibbs Co./Bell Soil Washing and Lumber and Pole Co., MN (12/31/92) Bioremediation (ex situ) of fines

Yes

6 6

Fruitland Drum, NM (09/08/90)

Dechlorination Yes

Incineration (Off-site)

Holloman AFB, Main POL Area, NM Bioremediation (In Situ) (Groundwater)

Note:

The 6th edition report also adds information on 53 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs. D-10

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
6th Edition Region 6 Site Name, State (ROD Date) Technology Listed in 5th Edition Added Deleted Yes Changed to Groundwater remediation not planned for this area. Determined there was insignificant concentration to warrant remediation. No further action. Determined that SVE was not viable. No alternative selected at this point. Comments Contacts/Phone Ron Stirling (USACE) 402-221-7664 Bert Gorrod 214-655-6779

Holloman AFB, Main POL Area, NM Air Sparging

South Valley, NM (09/30/88)

Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Tinker AFB (Soldier Creek Bldg. 3001), OK (08/16/90)

Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Susan Webster 214-655-6784 Major Richard Ashworth (USAF) 405-734-3058

Rocky Mountain Arsenal, M-1 Basins In Situ (OU 16), CO (02/26/90) Vitrification Portland Cement Co. (Kiln Dust No. 2 Chemical Treatment and No. 3) OU2, UT (03/31/92) Mesa Area Ground Water Contamination, AZ (09/27/91) Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Remedy cancelled due to problems Connally Mears with contractor. New ROD being 303-293-1528 negotiated. Not considered innovative Removed from NPL, deferred to the State Mike McCeney 303 293-1526 Maurice Chait 602-962-2187 Richard Oln 602-207-4176

8 9

Yes Yes

Castle Air Force Base, OU 1, CA (09/30/91)

Bioremediation (In Situ Groundwater) Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Pump and Treat Bench-scale test indicated that the David Roberts with Air technology did not work. No ESD 415-744-1487 Stripping or ROD amendment being issued. Brad Hicks (USAF) 209-726-4841 Misintrepretation of the ROD. SVE intended only for Spectra Physics, the adjacent site. Sean Hogan 415-744-2233 Carla Dube 510-286-1041

Teledyne Semi Conductors, CA (03/22/91)

Yes

Note:

The 6th edition report also adds information on 53 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs. D-11

Additions, Changes, and Deletions from the 5th edition report (September 1993) to the 6th edition report (September 1994). (continued)
6th Edition Region 9 Site Name, State (ROD Date) FMC (Fresno), CA (06/28/91) Technology Listed in 5th Edition Soil Washing Added Deleted Yes Changed to Soil washing did not work because the soil had too many fines. Looking at thermal desorption and solidification/ stabilization as possible remedies. Combined ROD for Signetics, AMD 901/902 and TRW Microwave site. SVE is not being done at the TRW OU. Misinterpretation of ROD. Technology canceled due to cost. Looking at solidification as an alternative. Comments Contacts/Phone Tom Dunkelman 415-744-2287 Mike Pfister (CA) 209-297-3934 Darrin Swartz-Larson 415-744-2233 Kevin Graves (CA) 510-286-0435 Marlin Mezquita 415-744-2393 George Siller (USACE) 916-557-7418 Dan Oburn (Sacramento Army Depot) 916-388-4344 Marie Jennings 206-553-1173

Signetics (Advanced Micro Devices 901), CA (09/11/91)

Soil Vapor Extraction

Yes

Sacramento Army Depot, Oxidation Lagoons OU, CA (09/30/92)

Soil Washing

Yes

10

McChord AFB Washrack Treatment Area, AK (09/28/92)

Bioremediation (Ex Situ)

Yes

Additional studies showed treatment not needed.

Note:

The 6th edition report also adds information on 53 innovative treatment technologies selected for remedial actions in FY 1993 RODs. D-12

TABLE E-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS Table E-1 provides summary information on the performance and operating parameters for applications of innovative treatment technologies that have been completed at remedial sites. It is intended to supplement, not replace, the information included in table A1.

E-1 15
Table 1-6

TABLE E-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS

Materials Handling Required Excavation Screening Mixing Dewatering

June 1994

Region 1

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Cannon Engineering/MA 5/90 to 10/90

Technology/ Vendor Thermal desorption/ Canonie Environmental Services Corp., Porter, IN

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (11,300 tons)

Key Contaminants Treated TCE, DCE, PCE, BTEX, vinyl chloride, chlorobenzene, SVOCs Criteria: 0.1 ppm - TCE, DCE, PCE, chlorobenzene 0.2 ppm - Toluene, Total Xylenes 0.05 ppm - Vinyl chloride SVOCs - 3 ppm Benzene - 0.1 ppm Input 500 - 3,000 ppm (Total VOCs) Output - <0.025 ppm (Total VOCs)

Operating Parameters Continuous operation 40 tons/hr 450 - 500 o F Moisture content before treatment 5% - 25% moisture Additives - dry soil (to reduce moisture content)

Residuals Management Exhaust gas treated with baghouse, scrubber, and carbon adsorption Scrubber water was treated with carbon adsorption

Comments The waste feed size limitation for the equipment, 1.875 inches, was an important consideration. More information is available in the RA report available from Region 1.

McKin, ME 7/86 to 4/87

Thermal desorption/ Canonie Env. Services Corp., Porter, IN

Soil (11,500 cy to a depth of 10 ft.)

BTEX, PAHs, TCE Criteria: 0.1 ppm TCE averaged over batch treatment volume 1.0 ppm per individual aromatic organic compound, and PAHs 10.0 ppm for total PAH constituents Input: Up to 3,310 ppm TCE Output: Less than 0.1 ppm TCE

Batch process: 8-9 cy/batch Residence time: 2 minutes/pass, 3 passes per batch 250-400 F soil exit temperature

Excavation Screening Mixing

Exhaust gas treated with baghouse, scrubber, and carbon adsorption Scrubber water was treated with carbon adsorption Residual solids deposited onsite. HEPA filters, baghouse bags, and PPE incinerated offsite

Newly added or completed projects

E-2

TABLE E-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required Excavation Screening

June 1994

Region 1

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Ottati & Goss, NH 6/89 to 9/89

Technology/ Vendor Thermal desorption/ Canonie Environmental Services Corp., Porter, IN

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (5,100 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated TCE, PCE, DCA, BTEX, TCA Criteria: 1 ppm - Total VOCs 0.1 ppm DCA, benzene, TCE, PCE Input: Up to 460 ppm TCE, 1200 ppm PCE Output: Less than 0.025 ppm TCE, PCE

Operating Parameters Batch process 300-400 F soil exit temperature

Residuals Management Exhaust gas treated with baghouse, scrubber, and carbon adsorption Scrubber water treated with carbon adsorption Residual solids stabilized and redeposited onsite

Comments For more information on this project, see the close out report available from Region 1.

2#

King of Prussia, NJ 6/93 - 10/93

Soil Washing using water and proprietary additive Alternative Remedial Technologies, Inc.

Soil, sludge, and sediments (19,200 tons)

Metals (Chromium, Copper, Nickel) Criteria: 11 metal-specific cleanup levels based on risk of exposure

Continuous process Feed rate: 25 tons/hr Addition of polymer and surfactants

Excavation Screening

Residual sludges disposed off-site as nonhazardous waste

X-ray fluorescene (XRF) used on-site for selective excavation

2#

SMS Instruments/ Deer Park, NY 4/92 to 12/93

Soil Vapor Extraction/ Four Seasons Environmental, Inc. Greensboro, NC

Soil (1,250 cy)

VOCs, SVOCs Criteria: Levels specified for nine VOCs and nine SVOCs, ranging from 500 to 4,500 g/kg Input: >1,000 ppm total VOCs Output: All soil samples met criteria

Two horizontal vapor extraction wells Vacuum of 378-406 w.c. inches (absolute) Depth to groundwater: 16- 24 feet

None (in situ)

Exhaust gases were treated with a catalytic incinerator and scubber

2#

Waldick Aerospace Devices (OU 1), NJ 5/93 to 10/93

Low temperature thermal treatment Rust Remedial Services, Inc., SC

Soil (4,000 cy)

Criteria: Total VOCs: 1 ppm Total petroleum hydrocarbons: 100 ppm

20 tons/hr, 450 - 500 F

Screening

Vapors treated in secondary thermal treatment unit; off-site s/s of treated soils

First use of full-scale unit; actual design capacity of unit is approximately 35 tons/hr.

Newly added or completed projects

E-3

TABLE E-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required Excavation Shredding, grinding Magnetic screening

June 1994

Region 2

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Wide Beach Development, NY 9/90 to 9/91

Technology/ Vendor Thermal desorption with APEG dechlorination/ SoilTech ATP Systems, Inc. Porter, IN

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (42,000 tons)

Key Contaminants Treated PCBs Criteria: Soils >10 ppm PCBs to be excavated and chemically treated 2 ppm PCBs established as remedial action contract cleanup level Input: 11-68 ppm PCBs Output: 2 ppm PCBs; one sample contained 21 ppm PCBs

Operating Parameters Continuous process Preheat/retort zone residence time: 3040 minutes Retort zone temperature: 1,160 F Combustion zone temperature: 1,293 F Additives: Alkaline polyethylene glycol (APEG) 19 vacuum extraction wells Depth of primary extraction well: 75 feet Operational inlet vacuum: 12 inches Hg

Residuals Management Exhaust gas treated with cyclone, baghouse, acid gas scrubber, and activated carbon adsorption Treated solids were intended to be redeposited; however, they were determined to be unstable for backfilling

Comments For further information on this dechlorination project, see the Demonstration Test Report produced by EPA, Region 2.

Upjohn Manufacturing Company, PR 1/83 to 3/88

Soil Vapor Extraction Terra Vac, Corp. Costa Mesa, CA

Soil (16,000 sq ft to approximately 100 ft deep) Approximately 17,800 gallons of CCl4 was removed from the soil

Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) Criteria: 50 g/liter CCl 4 (drinking water limit); calculated to correspond to "nondetectable" concentration of CCl 4 in exhaust gas for three consecutive months Input: Up to 2,200 ppm CCl4 (initial concentration) Output: Less than 2 ppb (final concentration)

None

Discharge of soil vapors through 30-ft stack No other off-gas treatment

For further information on this application, see the Applications Analysis Report for the Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System (EPA/540/A589/003).

3#

Defense General Supply Center, OU5, VA December 1-11, 1992

Soil Vapor Extraction EngineeringScience

Soil (1,000 cy)

VOCs (PCE, TCE)

In situ using one extraction well

Pilot study conducted 12/1/92 - 12/11/92 Soil samples revealed the soil showed no further contamination

E-4

TABLE E-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required Site preparation (land clearing) Excavation Screening Tilling

June 1994

Region 4

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Brown Wood Preserving, FL 10/88 to 12/91

Technology/ Vendor Land treatment/ Remediation Technologies, Inc. Seattle, Washington

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil/pond sediment (7,500 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated PAHs, defined in terms of total carcinogenic indicator chemicals (TCICs) Criteria: 100 ppm TCICs sampled on 8 subplots Input: Up to 208 ppm TCICs Output: Less than 92 ppm TCICs

Operating Parameters Soil treated in 3 lifts Retention time: 4 to 15 months Additives: water and nutrients Mixing rate: tilled once every two weeks

Residuals Management Treated material vegetated with grass (no cap) Retention pond constructed for runoff

Comments Further information on this project is available from the Remedial Action Close Out Report.

Hollingsworth Solderless, FL 1/91 to 7/91

Soil vapor extraction EBASCO (ARCS contractor)

Soil 60 cy (down to 7 feet deep)

TCE, vinyl chloride Target: total VOCs 1 ppm

In situ

None required

Air emissions vented to atmosphere

Design specifications were very critical. Need to pay close attention to design specifications

4#

Wamchem, SC During 8/93

Thermal desorption Four Seasons Greensboro, NC

Soil (2,200 cy)

Criteria: Acetone - 97 ppm Benzene - 2.43 ppm 1,2-Dichlorobenzene- 33.43 ppm 1,4-Dichlorobenzene- 38.06 ppm 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 3.62 ppm Naphthalene - 74.6 ppm Toluene - 34.5 ppm 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene - 4.23 ppm Total Xylenes - 67.6 ppm

Continuous feed 5-7 tons/hr

Catalytic oxidation of offgas

E-5

TABLE E-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required

June 1994

Region 5#

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Ninth Avenue Dump, IN 2/92 to 3/94

Technology/ Vendor In situ Flushing Fluor Daniel Chicago, IL

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (64,000 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated VOCs (TCE, BTEX) PAHs Pumped until no more oil recovered Inside slurry wall treated water 90% reduction in COD

Operating Parameters 14 extraction wells, unknown number of trenches 6,300 gallons of oil recovered

Residuals Management Recovered oil sent off-site for incineration, water recovered sent through oil/water separator, iron removal, and biological treatment prior to reinjection

Comments

Seymour Recycling, IN Summer - 1990 August-October, 1986 January-February, 1987

In situ soil bioremediation ABB Environmental Services Thermal Desorption SoilTech ATP Systems, Inc. Porter, IN

Soil (12 acres to 10 ft deep, approximately 43,500 cy)

54 contaminants present, including TCE, TCA, and Carbon Tetrachloride No standards or criteria for this OU in ROD

Additives - nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur as fertilizer (200,000 gallons of nutrients added) Continuous process Residence time: 15 minutes Throughput: 8 tons/hr Preheat zone temperature: 850 F Retort zone temperature: 1200 F Combustion zone temperature: 1300 F

Tilling

Capping in place

The soil became saturated quickly during this project, creating surface pools. The specially- designed tractor got stuck.

Outboard Marine Corp./Waukegan Harbor (OU #3), IL 1/92 to 7/92

Soil/Sediments (12,800 tons)

PCBs Criteria: 97% removal of PCBs Initial: 23,000 ppm PCBs Final: Achieved >97% removal, <9 ppm PCBs in treated soil

Excavation Mixing Dewatering

Exhaust gas treated with cyclone, baghouse, acid gas scrubber, and activated carbon adsorption Condensed water discharged to sanitary sewer after triple filtration, UV oxidation, and carbon adsorption

Reduced PCB levels much more than expected.

E-6

TABLE E-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required Excavation screening dewatering Stockpiling

June 1994

Region 5#

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Anderson Development (ROD Amendment), MI 11/92 to 6/93

Technology/ Vendor Thermal desorption Weston Services, Inc.

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (5,100 tons)

Key Contaminants Treated SVOCs (MBOCA) Input: 660 ppm (maximum) MBOCA Criteria: 1.684 ppm MBOCA Output: <1.684 ppm MBOCA Greater than 99% removal

Operating Parameters Continuous with a retention time of 1 hour and throughput of 50-60 tons per day. Temperature 500 - 600 F. Moisture content 4050% Most of waste was treated twice because 1 hour retention time was not enough. 1,400-1,600 cu ft/ min of air Started >1,000 lbs/day removed Total removed 45,000 lbs of VOCs 23 extraction wells

Residuals Management Wastewater discharged to treatment facility. Treated soils and fly ash sent to Type II Landfill. Carbon sent to RCRA disposal facility

Comments Site reports available.

Verona Well Field (Thomas Solvent/Raymond Road) (OU1), MI 3/88 to 5/92

Soil vapor extraction (attempted nitrogen sparging) Terra Vac, Inc. Costa Mesa, CA

Soil (26,700 cy, 36,000 ft2 to a depth of 20 ft.)

Initial soil concentration TCE 550,000 ppb; PCE 1.8 million ppb; Toluene 730,000 ppb; Xylene 420,000 ppb Criteria in all post remedial soil samples; Total Xylenes 6,000 ppb; Toluene 16,000 ppb; Benzene 20 ppb; Ethylbenzene 14,000 ppb; 1,1- DCE 10 ppb; trans-1,2-DCE 2,000 ppb; 1,1,1-TCA 4,000 ppb; Carbon tet., 10 ppb; 1,2-DCA 10 ppb; 1,1-DCA 20 ppb; Methylene chloride 100 ppb; cis-1,2 DCE 20 ppb; PCE 10 ppb; TCE 60 ppb

No materials handling; required installing extraction wells Vapors initially treated with carbon; then with CATOX; and then returned to carbon

Spent carbon was regenerated (and eventually incinerated)

Initial estimate of product too low. Treatment equipment undersized. Needed better quantification of VOCs in soils to design appropriate size. Plan for enhancing system to deal with saturated soils and free product. Public information available includes performance report, and technical memo.

E-7

TABLE E-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required

June 1994

Region 5#

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Pristine, OH 9/93 to 3/94

Technology/ Vendor Thermal desorption

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (19,400 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated Criteria: aldrin - 15 g/kg benzene - 116 g/kg chloroform - 2,043 g/kg DDT - 487 g/kg 1,2-DCA - 19 g/kg 1,1-DCE - 285 g/kg dieldrin - 6 g/kg PAHs - 14 g/kg dioxin - 0 g/kg PCE - 3,244 g/kg TCE - 175 g/kg Volatile organic compounds; PCBs; phenols, heavy metals Cleanup Goals: Benzo(a)pyrene - 9 ppm PCB - 23 ppm Volatile organic compounds - 43 ppm Arsenic - 7 ppm Benzene - 14 ppm

Operating Parameters

Residuals Management

Comments

6#

French Ltd. Crosby, TX 1/92 to 12/93

Bioremediation (slurry phase) ENSR Houston, TX

Soil/sludge (150,000 cy)

In situ treatment

Air sparging Pumping Dredging

In situ treatment

First use of bioremediation technology at a Superfund site Cleanup of contaminated groundwater to be completed in 1996

7#

Hastings GW Contamination, Well No. 3, NE 6/92 to 7/93

Soil vapor extraction Morrison Knudsen

Soil 1 acre down to 120 feet deep (approximately 194,000 cy)

Carbon tetrachloride Initial: 100 ppm Final: <0.2 ppm Target removal rate achieved was 0.001 lb/hr, removed in excess of 500 lbs TCE Initial extracted gas concentration 60 ppm Final extracted gas concentration 2 to 3 ppm

In situ cyclic operation, operated for a total of 4,325 hours

Vapors treated with granular activated carbon (GAC)

Carbon sent offsite for regeneration

Soil Vapor extraction system exceeded predictions by the model due to sand and gravel present at the site. Cleanup occurred much quicker than predicted by the model. Sampling indicated the presence of TCE mainly in the soil gas samples and not the soil samples

Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU 18) Interim Response, CO 6/91 to 12/91

Soil vapor extraction Vapor phase carbon adsorption to capture vapors Woodward Clyde Denver, CO

Soil (100 ft radius down to 60 ft; approximately 70,000 cy)

145-335 cu. ft./min. of air Total removed 70 lbs. 2 extraction wells

No materials handling; required installing extraction wells

Vapors captured on carbon

E-8

TABLE E-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required

June 1994

Region 8#

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Wastech Chemical, UT 10/92 to 12/92

Technology/ Vendor Bioremediation (Ex situ) Land treatment on an asphalt pad Harding/Lawson Soil vapor extraction, in situ flushing with treated groundwater

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (1,100 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated VOCs (Toluene, Xylene)

Operating Parameters Tilled, addition of nutrients and water

Residuals Management Soil redeposited on site

Comments Air emission standards not exceeded

Fairchild Semiconductor (San Jose), CA 1/89 to 6/90

Soil (42,000 cy)

TCA, DCE, IPA, xylenes, acetone, Freon-113, PCE ROD originally stated cleanup target of 1 ppm Amended cleanup goals required SVE operation until VOC removal rate was 10% of initial rate, or VOC removal rate was <1% per day for 10 consecutive days

39 extraction wells; 28-144 scfm air flow rate; 15 inches of Hg operating vacuum

None

In situ treatment; carbon adsorption of offgases

Groundwater pump and treat was conducted in conjunction with SVE; slurry wall was constructed to limit contaminant migration

9#

Intersil/Siemens, CA Intersil portion of the site completed Fall 93

Soil Vapor Extraction Geo-Matrix, San Francisco, CA

Soil

VOCs (TCE 1,1,1-TCA, XyLene)

E-9

TABLE E-1 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required None

June 1994

Region 9

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Sacramento Army Depot Tank 2 Operable Unit, CA 8/92 to 1/93

Technology/ Vendor In-situ soil vapor extraction, extracted vapor treated with gas phase carbon adsorption, water treatment by the existing on-site UV-hydrogen peroxide treatment plant/Terra Vac, Inc. San Leandro, CA

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (1,000 cy, 25 by 35 ft., 31 ft. depth)

Key Contaminants Treated VOCs (Ethylbenzene, PCE, MEK Total Xylenes) Initial concentration: MEK 0.011 - 150 mg/kg Ethylbenzene 0.006 2,100 mg/kg PCE 0.006 - 390 mg/kg Total Xylene 0.005 11,000 mg/kg Clean up goal 1.2 mg/kg MEK 6 mg/kg Ethylbenzene 23 mg/kg total Xylene 0.2 mg/kg PCE 100 mg/kg total hydrocarbons

Operating Parameters 24 hours/day Air flow rate: 16-365 scfm

Residuals Management Extracted vapor treated with gas phase carbon adsorption water treatment by the existing on-site UV-hydrogen peroxide treatment plant

Comments Freon - 113 unexpectedly extracted by system impacted system operation

E-10

TABLE E-2 REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS Table E-2 provides summary information on the performance and operating parameters for applications of innovative treatment technologies that have been completed at removal sites. It is intended to supplement, not replace, the information included in table B2.

18 E-11

TABLE E-2 REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS

Materials Handling Required None

June 1994

Region 2

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Signo Trading International, Inc., NY 10/20/87 to 10/21/87 (Removal)

Technology/ Vendor KPEG dechlorination/ Galson Remediation, Syracuse, NY Mercury pretreatment precipiated mercury salts into mercury sulfide so that the mercury can be recovered and recycled. ENSCO

Media Treated (Quantity) Sludge (15 gallons)

Key Contaminants Treated Dioxin Input - 135 ppb

Operating Parameters Temperature: 150 C Time: Overnight

Residuals Management Incineration of residuals (without dioxin contamination) at treatment, storage, and disposal facility Residual salts containing less than 260 pm mercury were incinerated offsite

Comments

Output - 1 ppb

Vineland Chemical Company, NJ 12/92 (Removal)

Solid 100 lbs

Mercury initial concentration >10% mercury Final concentration of mercury in recyclable precipitate was greater than 80%. Less than 260 ppm if mercury in thatn nonrecycled salt.

Added salt to precipitate the mercury

None

First known Superfund site where this process has been applied

Zhiegner Refining Company (Removal) 2/93 - 6/93

Mercury pretreatment precipiated mercury salts into mercury sulfide so that the mercury can be recovered and recycled. ENSCO

Solid 100 lbs

Mercury initial concentration >10% mercury Final concentration of mercury in recyclable precipitate was greater than 80%. Less than 260 ppm if mercury in thatn nonrecycled salt.

Added salt to precipitate the mercury

None

Residual salts containing less than 260 pm mercury were incinerated offsite

No comments

Newly added or completed projects

E-12

TABLE E-2 REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required Pumping

June 1994

Region 3

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Avtex Fibers, VA 4/90 to 8/91 (Removal)

Technology/ Vendor Chemical treatment (oxidation using NaClO) OH Materials, Findlay, OH (ERCS Contractor)

Media Treated (Quantity) Sludge/water from storage unit (2 million gallons)

Key Contaminants Treated Carbon disulfide Criteria: <10 ppm Carbon disulfide in the effluent Input: 50-200,000 ppm Carbon disulfide Output: <10 ppm Carbon disulfide

Operating Parameters Batch operation average retention time - 1 hour pH - 10 Additives: Sodium hypochloride. The retention time and reagent feed rates increased with increasing concentration of sludge in the contaminated water. Continuous operation Time: 2 hours pH: 10 Temp: 20oC Rate: 27 tons/day Moisture content 60% Additives: Sodium hydroxide Triethylamine

Residuals Management Salts from the reaction were removed with flocculation and clarifi-cation at existing treatment plant, pH adjustment

Comments Carbon disulfide is unstable and will be found with other contaminants in aqueous waste stream. For additional information on this project, see the Removal Close Out Report available from EPA Region III or OH Materials.

General Refining Company, GA August-October, 1986 January-February, 1987 (Removal)

Solvent extraction Resource Conservation Technology Company, Bellevue, WA

Sludge (3,448 tons)

Input: PCB - 5.0 ppm Lead - 10,000 ppm Output: PCB - insignificant Lead - concentrated in solids

Excavation Screening Neutralization Size Reduction Mixing

Oil - used as fuel for kiln Water - treated, discharged off site Solids solidified and disposed of on site

The oil recovered from the extractions process could not be sold because of an elevated metals content. The solvent could not be recovered due to leaks in system seals. The unit required a relatively uniform material so materials handling of the sludges proved difficult in the beginning of the project. The leadbearing solids produced by the dryer also required special handling. Finally, detergents in the sludge hindered oil/water separation.

Newly added or completed projects

E-13

TABLE E-2 REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required

June 1994

Region 4

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Hinson Chemical, SC 12/88 to 3/92 (Removal)

Technology/ Vendor Soil vapor extraction OH Materials Atlanta, GA

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (60,000 cy, up to 50 ft deep)

Key Contaminants Treated Benzene, TCE, PCE, DCA, MEK At completion: <10 ppm Total VOCs (In all samples); average <1 ppm Total VOCs

Operating Parameters In situ; continuous operation (except for occasional shut downs to allow soil gas to reach equilibrium in the pore spaces) Used a system of extraction and injection wells. 1,000 separate PVC wells. Injection wells 7 to 8 feet deep. Extraction wells 2-3 feet deep. Vapors captured and put through a knock out pot and incinerated.

Residuals Management Air emissions captured on vapor phase carbon No cap needed

Comments

CSX McCormick Derailment Site, S.C. (Removal)

Soil vapor extraction with air flushing MWRI

Soil (200,000 cy)

Benzene-tolueneethylbenzene-xylene (BTEX) 130,000 gallon spill

Brought in clay to cover the area, to prevent air from infiltrating

Residual wastewater sent off-site for treatment

System was successful in decreasing concentration to cleanup goals. Had difficulties due to fluctuation of shallow ground water. Did not anticipate the change in ground water to be as drastic as it was. It decreased the efficiency, less vapors and more water. Now need to address ground water. Could have used the soil vapor extraction in a more limited area.

Newly added or completed projects

E-14

TABLE E-2 REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required Surface impoundment used for disposal of waste solvents. Built an enclosure over the site. Excavated the soil and screened it with a power screen. Stacked on PVC extraction wells. Recovered VOCs with duct work and fan. Vapors incinerated. Excavation Screening

June 1994

Region 4

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Basket Creek Surface Impoundment, GA 11/92 - 2/93 (Removal)

Technology/ Vendor Vacuum extraction of soil pile with horizontal wells (ex-situ) OHM

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (2,000 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated VOCs TCE, PCE, MEK, MIBK, BTEX High 33% VOCs Average 1-5% Criteria: TCE - 0.5 mg/L TCLP PCE - 0.7 mg/L TCLP All VOCs met TCLP limits

Operating Parameters Vacuum pressure monitored. 1,300 CFM/Manifold 3 manifold 6-7 wells/manifold

Residuals Management Residual soils and rejects from screening met TCLP limits and were disposed as nonhazardous as on RCRA Subtitle D landfill. Incinerated 70,000 lbs of VOCs

Comments $2,000,000 total costs. Permeability in-situ soil was not good at first. Excavation and ex-situ treatment improved permeability. Shouldn't rule out if you can't do in situ.

4#

TH Agriculture and Nutrition Albany, GA

Thermal desorption/ Focus and Williams Environmental Services, Inc.

Soil (4,318 tons)

Pesticides Criteria: Reduction of 90% in concentration of alpha and beta BHC; 4,4'DDT; and toxaphene Less than 100 mg/kg total OCL pesticides in treated soil

Continuous operation 7.8 tons/hr 250 - 510 F exit gas temperature 15 minutes residence time

Soils: quenched Off-gasses: baghouse, water quench, reheaters, and carbon adsorption water: carbon adsorption Confirmatory sampling to occur after melt cools (approximately Summer 1995)

5#

Parson Chemical, MI

In situ vitrification

Soil (3,000 cy)

Newly added or completed projects

E-15

TABLE E-2 REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required Agitation

June 1994

Region 5

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation PBM Enterprises, MI 3/25/85 to 10/28/85 (Removal)

Technology/ Vendor Neutralization with hypochlorite process Mid-American Environmental Service, Riverdale, IL

Media Treated (Quantity) Film chips (464 tons or 1,280 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated Cyanide Input: 200 ppm Output: 20 ppm

Operating Parameters Time: 2-3 hours Additives: sodium hydroxide

Residuals Management Rinse water, runoff and waste hypochlorite treated off site Treated chips landfilled (Subtitle D)

Comments

Traband Warehouse PCBs, OK (Removal) 2/90 to 9/90 Crown Plating, MO 10/1/89 to 12/31/89 (Removal)

Solvent Extraction/ Terra Kleen Dechlorination using the KPEG process EPA removal contractor

Solids

PCBs Initial: 7,500 ppm Criteria: Dioxin - <1 ppb Input: Silvex - 10,000 ppm Dioxin equivalents 24.18 ppb Output: Silvex - 32 ppb Dioxin equivalents 0.068 ppb Moisture content 100% Temperature 72 C pH - 13 Batch operation Retention time - 36 hours (including time of equipment breakdown) Built an on-site vacuum for emissions control Contaminated residual oil incinerated offsite

Liquid (5 gallons)

Newly added or completed projects

E-16

TABLE E-2 REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required Tilling Removal of rocks and debris

June 1994

Region 7

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Scott Lumber, MO 12/89 to 9/91 (Removal)

Technology/ Vendor Land Treatment RETEC Billings, MT

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (15,961 tons)

Key Contaminants Treated Input: 1500 - 1000 ppm Total PAH 23 ppm Benzo(a)pyrene Criteria: 500 ppm - Total PAH 14 ppm Benzo(a)pyrene Output: 130 ppm Total PAH 8 ppm Benzo(a)pyrene

Operating Parameters Additives: Water phosphates Soil treated in 2 lifts 1st lift - 9 inches 2nd lift - 7 inches Cultivated approximately 1 to 2 times per week

Residuals Management None

Comments

Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ 3/28/85 to 6/24/85 (Removal)

In situ chemical treatment (followed by anaerobic bioremediation) EPA removal contractor

Soil (3,220 cy)

Input: Toxaphene - 1,470 ppm Ethyl parathion - 86 ppm Methyl parathion - 24 ppm Output: Toxaphene - 470 ppm Ethyl parathion - 56 ppm Methyl parathion - 3 ppm

pH: 10.2 to 11.8 Moisture: wet Additives to soil: Sodium hydroxide, Water

Bioremediation

Newly added or completed projects

E-17

TABLE E-2 REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required Tilling

June 1994

Region 9

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Gila River Indian Reservation, AZ 6/24/85 to 10/23/85 (Removal)

Technology/ Vendor In situ anaerobic biological treatment (preceded by chemical treatment) EPA removal contractor

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (3,220 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated Toxaphene Input: 470 ppm Output: 180 ppm

Operating Parameters pH: 8.3 to 9.8 Additives to soil: Sulfuric acid, manure, sludge

Residuals Management Capped in place

Comments The biological treatment would have been more successful if the neutralization after the chemical treatment had been more complete. The tearing of the plastic sheets covering the soils allowed air in and prevented anaerobic activity.

Roseville Drums, CA 2/12/88 to 11/9/88 (Removal)

In situ Bioremediation EPA removal contractor

Soil (14 cy)

Input: Dichlorobenzene 4,000 ppm Phenol - 12,000 ppm Output: Dichlorobenzene 140 ppm Phenol - 6 ppm

Additives to soil: manure, water

Tilling

Stanford Pesticide Site #1, AZ 3/20/87 to 11/4/87 (Removal)

Chemical treatment alkaline hydrolysis EPA removal contractor

Soil (200 cy)

Methyl parathion Input: 24.2 ppm Output: 0.05 ppm

pH: 9.0 Moisture: wet Additives to soil: soda ash, water, activated carbon

Tilling (in situ, 3 times per week)

Newly added or completed projects

E-18

TABLE E-2 REMOVAL ACTIONS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

Materials Handling Required Excavation Placement in double-lined pit Irrigation m- and p-cresol - 409 ppm Output: Phenol - 1 ppm o-cresol - 1 ppm m- and p-Cresol 0.92 ppm 10 Drexler-RAMCOR, WA 7/92 to 8/92 (removal) Low temperature thermal desorption treatment. Thermally treat 3,000 tons of soil on-site up to 700 F. Four Seasons Soil 3,000 tons (approximately 3,000 cy) Petroleum hydrocarbons Polynuclear Aromatics, BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene 200 ppm TPH was target. Initial TPH was 70,000 ppm (high) 15,000 - 20,000 ppm (average). Treated soil TPH was 100 - 200 ppm 16 hours/day 12 to 15 tons/hr Operating temperature up to 700 F Vapors treated by catalytic oxidation Excavation screening Removed material greater than 2 inches. Rock washing station for particles greater than 2 inches. Steam cleaned large rocks. Added water after treatment for dust suppression Treated soil was backfilled back into the excavated areas on-site. Soil that did not meet the targets was retreated. Wastewater was treated onsite through carbon filters. Tilling

June 1994

Region 9

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Poly-Carb, Inc., NV 7/22/87 to 8/16/88 (Removal)

Technology/ Vendor Land treatment and soil washing EPA removal contractor

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (1,500 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated Input: Phenol 1,020 ppm o-cresol - 100 ppm

Operating Parameters Additives: water

Residuals Management Leachate collection and treatment with granular activated carbon

Comments This treatment used both bioremediation and soil flushing in one step.

Total cost approximately $250,000.

Newly added or completed projects

E-19

TABLE E-3 OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS

Table E-3 provides summary information on the performance and operating parameters for applications of innovative treatment technologies that have been completed at non-Superfund sites. It is intended to supplement, not replace the information included in table C-1.

16 E-19
Table 3-4

TABLE E-3 OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS

Materials Handling Required Dredging Screening Size Reduction

June 1993

Region 5

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Saginaw Bay Confined Disposal Facility, MI October 1991 to June 4, 1992 (Army)

Technology/ Vendor Soil washing; Water with flocculant and surfactant as an additive Bermann USA Stafford Springs, CT

Media Treated (Quantity) Sediment (150 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated PCBs Input Sediment = 1.6 mg/kg Output Sand = 0.20 mg/kg Output Organics = 11 mg/kg Output Fines = 4.4 mg/kg

Operating Parameters 30 cy of sediment treated per day

Residuals Management Residuals were left at the facility Wastewater discharged to confined disposal facility

Comments Forced cold-weather shut down is a limitation

6#

Matagorda Island Af Range, TX 10/92 to 2/28/93

Ex situ bioremdiation; solid phase All constructed on abandoned runway. Bacteria added and mechanically mixed. Four USTs found contamination under one UST. CCC, Inc. San Antonio, TX

Soil (500 cy)

TPH, PAHs benzene-tolueneethylbenzene-xylene (BTEX) TPH - 3,400 ppm BTEX - 41.3 ppm Criteria: Texas water commission standards 100 ppm for TPH 30 ppm for combined BTEX

Batch process Retention time: 3 months 9 inch layers treated. Ambient temperature bacterial added to waste

Excavated approximately 40 by 60 ft area. Constructed on poly barrier and clean sand base. Did some mixing.

Backfilled the soil into the excavation

Island is now a wildlife refuge, has an endangered species.

Ft. Ord Marina, Fritzche AAF Fire Drill Area, CA Winter 1991 (Army)

Land farming

Soil (4,000 cy)

TCE, MEK, TPH, BTEX

Initial concentration > 1,000 ppm End concentration < 200 ppm

None

None

Gail Youngblood 408-242-8017

Marine Corps. Mountain Warfare Center Bridgeport, CA 8/89 to 11/89 (Navy)

Bioremediation (ex situ); heap pile bioreactor

Soil (7,000 cy)

PAHs (petroleum hydrocarbons, diesel), Metals (Lead) After 2 months of operation the TPH levels were 120 ppm

Excavation

Temperature, pressure and moisture content are monitored Bill Major (DoD) 805-982-1808

Newly added or completed projects

E-20

TABLE 3-4 OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS: PERFORMANCE DATA ON COMPLETED PROJECTS (continued)

June 1993

Region 9#

Site Name, State, Dates of Operation Luke AFB, AZ 11/92 to 5/9

Technology/ Vendor Soil vapor extraction with air flushing and thermal oxidation of offgases Jacobs Engineering

Media Treated (Quantity) Soil (35,000 cy)

Key Contaminants Treated VOCs (2-hexanone, 2butanone, 4-methyl 2 pentanone, BTEX) Removed approximately 11,000 lbs of vapors and 4,000 lbs of condensate

Operating Parameters In situ down to 100 feet

Materials Handling Required None

Residuals Management Vaports were thermally oxidized

Comments Total petroleum hydrocarbons were present but were too heavy to volatilize. Would recommend combining SVE with in situ bioremediation to treat contaminants that could not be extracted with the SVE.

Davis Monthan AFB, AZ July 1991 to March 1992 Naval Communication Station, Scotland February to October 1985 (Navy)

Bioremediation (In situ soil) Bioremediation In situ soil, in situ ground water

Soil (440 cy)

PAHs (Petroleum Hydrocarbones) TPH (No. 2 diesel fuel) Microorganisms function best between 20 C and 35 C. Run-off water collected in a trench None The contaminated area had considerable slope, and the contaminated soil was a thin layer over a relatively impermeable rock substrate.

Soil, Groundwater Soil quantity approximately 800 m2 in area, depth unknown

Newly added or completed projects

E-21

TABLE E-4 REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES Table E-4 lists the sites at which innovative treatment technologies are used together with established or other innovative treatment technologies in treatment trains. Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material requiring further treatment, to prevent the emission of volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants in a single medium.

E-22 14

TABLE E-4. REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES

June 1994

Dechlorination Followed by Soil Washing Myers Property NJ

Soil Washing Followed by (continued) Incineration Incineration Solidification/Stabilization Arkwood South Cavalcade Street Gould, Inc AR TX OR

Ex Situ Bioremediation Followed by Solidification/Stabilization Solidification/Stabilization Solidification/Stabilization Solidification/Stabilization Solidification/Stabilization Whitmoyer Laboratories, OU 3 J. H. Baxter Cape Fear Wood Preserving Oklahoma Refining Co. PAB Oil PA CA NC OK LA Solvent Extraction Followed by Incineration Solidification/Stabilization United Cresoting O'Connor TX ME

Thermal Desorption Followed by In Situ Flushing Followed by Dechlorination In Situ Bioremediation In Situ Bioremediation In Situ Bioremediation In Situ Bioremediation Peak Oil/Bay Drums, OU Pester Burn Pond Idaho Pole Company Montana Pole Company FL KS MT MT Dechlorination Incineration of Organic Vapors Incineration of Organic Vapors Incineration of Organic Vapors Incineration of Organic Vapors Solidification/Stabilization Solidification/Stabilization Solidification/Stabilization Solidification/Stabilization Solidification/Stabilization Arlington Blending & Packaging Co., OU 1 Smith's Farm Brooks, OU 1 Sarney Farm Outboard Marine/Waukegan Harbor Carter Industries Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace) Waldick Aerospace Devices USA Letterkenny (SE Area, OU 1) Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc., OU 2 Carter Industries Martin Marietta (Denver Aerospace) TN KY NY IL MI CO NJ PA IL MI CO

Soil Vapor Extraction Followed by In Situ Bioremediation In Situ Flushing In Situ Flushing Solidification/Stabilization Soil Washing Swope Oil & Chemical Co. JADCO - Hughes Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc. Genzale Plating Company, OU 1 Zanesville Well Field NJ NC NY NY OH

Soil Washing Followed by Bioremediation Bioremediation Bioremediation Bioremediation Bioremediation Cabot Carbon/Koppers Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits Cape Fear Wood Preserving Moss-American Koppers (Oroville) FL FL NC WI CA

E-24

FIGURE E-1 SUPERFUND REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES TOTAL TREATMENT TRAINS = 38
Soil Washing

Bioremediation (5 sites)
Followed by
OR

Incineration (2 sites)
OR

Solidification/ Stabilization (1 site)

Thermal Desorption

Incineration (4 sites)
Followed by
OR

S/S (5 sites)

Dechlorination (2 sites)
OR

Soil Vapor Extraction

In Situ Bioremediation (1 site)

Followed by
OR

In Situ Flushing (2 sites)

OR

S/S (1 site)
OR

Soil Washing (1 site)

Dechlorination

Soil Washing (1 site)

Followed by

Solvent Extraction
Followed by

Solidification/ Stabilization (1 site)

OR

Incineration (1 site)

Bioremediation

Solidification/Stabilization (5 sites)
Followed by

In Situ Flushing
Followed by

In Situ Bioremediation (4 sites)

E-23 8

TABLE E-5 REMOVAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES Table E-5 lists the at which innovative treatment technologies are used together with established or other innovative treatment technologies in treatment trains. Technologies may be combined to reduce the volume of material requiring further treatment, to prevent the emission of volatile contaminants during excavation and mixing, or to address multiple contaminants in a single medium.

17 E-25 2-23

TABLE E-5. REMOVAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT TRAINS WITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES

June 1994

Chemical Treatment Followed by In Situ Bioremediation Gila River Indian Reservation AZ

In Situ Flushing Followed by In Situ Bioremediation Polycarb NV

Soil Washing Followed by Bioremediation Southeastern Wood Preserving MS

Solvent Extraction Followed by Solidification/Stabilization General Refining GA

E-26