Typhoon Haiyan Weather Data From Icyclone

ICYCLONE CHASE REPORT PRELIMINARY
storm location date chasers Super Typhoon HAIYAN (YOLANDA) Tacloban City, Leyte, Philippines 08 November 2013 Josh Morgerman, James Reynolds, Mark Thomas author Josh Morgerman
Location
We observed the passage of Super Typhoon HAIYAN in Tacloban City, Leyte, Philippines, at 11.2414N 125.0036E. We rode out the storm in Hotel Alejandro, in the heart of the Downtown district. As per radar (see Radar shots, below), the center of the cyclone crossed the Leyte coast between Tolosa and Dulag, very near the village of San Jose, at ~7 am PHT. This landfall point is ~15 n mi S of downtown Tacloban City. The city was in the N eyewall and just a couple of miles from the edge of the eye. The Chase Map shows our location (green marker) in relation to Haiyans center at landfall (red marker), as per radar. (Chase Map Detail is a closer view.)
Figure 1: Chase Map
__
2013 iCyclone iCyclone Chase Report PRELIMINARY: HAIYAN 2013 11.08.13 page 1 / 7

Figure 2: Chase Map Detail
Overview
Haiyan was a small, fast-moving, extremely violent cyclone that made a direct hit on Tacloban City. Key observations (all times in this document PHT): Very destructive winds didnt start until about 6:30 amonly 45 minutes before the centers closest approach (~7:15 am). Highest winds occurred near or after the centers closest approach. The storm surge rose very suddenly and rapidly, and it peaked near or after the centers closest approach. The hotel flooded to a depth of ~4 ft. If the elevation at this location is truly 26 ftas indicated by USGSthat suggests a storm surge of up to ~30 ft. Its possible the elevation may have been as low as 15 ft, in which case, the surge was ~20 ft. (See more about this below, under Calibration.) Very destructive winds and storm-surge inundation lasted only a few hoursa short-duration event compared with a typical tropical-cyclone passage.
We deployed two devices for measuring air pressure. Lowest pressures and times are as follows: Device 1: 960.8 mb at 7:12 am Device 2: 960.3 mb at 7:20 am
Please note that all observations, aside from air-pressure data, are preliminary and are subject to change upon review of the time-stamped video footage. See more below Re: the air-pressure readings.
__
Air Pressure Discussion

Devices
We deployed two devices in our hotelboth Kestrel 4500s. The sampling rate was one reading per 30 seconds.
Calibration
USGS data indicate the ground elevation at the hotel is ~26 ft. Before the storm, we attempted to verify this with a three-block walk to the waterfrontto eyeball itbut it was difficult to assess with confidence. Given this, we used 26 ft as our value. Device 1 was deployed in a small drawer in the hotel lobby, on the ground floor. Since it was several feet off the ground, the device was calibrated (for sea-level readings) using an altitude of 30 ft. Device 2 was deployed in our fourth-floor room. To calibrate this device, we used the air pressure from Device 1 as a reference, setting the altitude in Device 2 so the air pressure matched Device 1 (~60 ft).
Disruption of Device 1
Sometime after 7:30 am, storm surge flooded the hotel lobby, knocking over the piece of furniture holding Device 1. The drawer holding Device 1 was submerged for a timeuntil the storm died down and we were able to retrieve it. Its unclear what effect this may have had on the air-pressure data and there are no obvious irregularities in the trace that can help identify when the disruption occurred. However, this disruption happened after the lowest pressure was reached and the center was moving away from the city.
Lowest Pressure & Intensity

Both instruments had low pressures around 960 mb in the cyclones N eyewall, just a couple of miles outside of the eye. At the time, the typhoon was estimated to have a central pressure possibly under 900 mb. The center was only ~15 n mi away at the time, suggesting an incredible gradient of ~4 mb/n mi. If this seems implausible, then either the central-pressure estimates were too low or our equipment wasnt accurate. The healthy corroboration between our two instruments, spaced four stories apart, gives some confidence to those readingsbut not 100%. The cyclone was extremely severe, with very high winds that completely defoliatedand in some instances debarkedtrees across the city and region, suggesting the intensity was not overestimated. But perhaps the central pressure didnt need to be so exceptionally low to cause these winds. The cyclones relatively small RMW, as well as very strong high pressure to the N, are two factors which may have contributed to augmenting the cyclones winds.
__

BarogramsClean
Following are clean barograms for both devicesplotted for the same time period (for easy comparison), and excluding some non-representative pressure spikes:
Figure 3: BarogramDevice 1 (CLEAN)
Figure 4: BarogramDevice 2 (CLEAN)
__

BarogramsRaw
Following are barograms of the raw data. Notice that the two devices ran for different periodsand also Device 2 had some odd pressure spikes which are not considered representative:
Figure 5: BarogramDevice 1 (RAW)
Figure 6: BarogramDevice 2 (RAW)
__
More Imagery
Figure 7: RadarFar
Cebu radar at 07:00:59 am PHT, showing Haiyans center making landfall on the Leyte coast. At this time, Tacloban City (black square) was in the N eyewall. The lowest pressure in the city occurred ~15 minutes later.
__

Figure 8: RadarClose
Close-up of Cebu radar, showing Haiyans center making landfall and Tacloban City in the N eyewall.
Questions or Feedback?
Get in touch: Josh Morgerman iCyclone [email protected]
__

Typhoon Haiyan Weather Data From Icyclone

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Typhoon Haiyan Weather Data From Icyclone

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Typhoon Haiyan Weather Data From Icyclone

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ICYCLONE CHASE REPORT PRELIMINARY

Figure 1: Chase Map

ICYCLONE CHASE REPORT PRELIMINARY

ICYCLONE CHASE REPORT PRELIMINARY

Air Pressure Discussion

Lowest Pressure & Intensity

ICYCLONE CHASE REPORT PRELIMINARY

Figure 3: BarogramDevice 1 (CLEAN)

Figure 4: BarogramDevice 2 (CLEAN)

ICYCLONE CHASE REPORT PRELIMINARY

Figure 5: BarogramDevice 1 (RAW)

Figure 6: BarogramDevice 2 (RAW)

ICYCLONE CHASE REPORT PRELIMINARY

ICYCLONE CHASE REPORT PRELIMINARY

You might also like