Teaching Project Management: A Student Perspective: R. Clark
Teaching Project Management: A Student Perspective: R. Clark
Teaching Project Management: A Student Perspective: R. Clark
R. Clark Centre for Learning Innovation and Professional Practice Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK [email protected]
Abstract Employability is a key concern of most students as they embark on a course of university study. For engineering students today a more diverse course of learning that brings together technical, managerial and life skills is becoming increasingly common. Previous work has explored the inclusion of project management in the engineering curriculum and identified innovative yet practical approaches to the teaching of the subject [1]. This study builds on this earlier work by exploring the student view of project management and its study. An on-line survey has been administered to two groups of students to ascertain their understanding of project management, its alignment with their future careers and their perceptions of the learning and teaching environment required for effective study. With projects such a fundamental component of business today and with anecdotally around 25% of Engineering Management masters students becoming project managers on graduation, a deeper understanding of the role project management can play in the development of tomorrows engineers is of significant value. This study will be presented against the backdrop of a move towards a more project management focused engineering teaching group structure and the establishment of a Centre for Project Management Practice to promote business engagement and research. Keywords: project management, student perspective, employability
1. INTRODUCTION
Against a backdrop of global economic crisis, the need for qualified engineers is still apparent. The challenges faced by our world related to sustainability demand talent that can demonstrate skills not simply in technical disciplines but in the context of the wider business and social environment. The term multi-skilled engineer is starting to be voiced more openly, as governments and businesses search for the workforce of the future. This paper explores a part of this issue. Project management is often identified as a discipline that multi-skilled engineers should be conversant with. The question posed here and investigated by way of a small exploratory study is whether or not current university students view project management as an important part of their education and future career.
In terms of project management, the literature is limited when it comes to exploring perceptions of project management, whether by students or other potential stakeholders. A common view of project management across an organisation is often not reality, neither is the notion that working to standards ensures good project performance [4]. This variability suggests that a broader view of project management education is an important step to take. Focusing on project success, influence has been identified as an important characteristic of the project manager / team member relationship [5]. By effectively employing influence, project success becomes more likely. This argument is typical of many in the literature that suggest it is the so-called softer skills that need emphasis in developing the project management skill base. Relying on the tried and tested Iron Triangle of cost, quality and time, with the underlying techniques for planning and control is no longer acceptable [6]. A survey of practice in project management reported in 2002 demonstrates the breadth of skills required to deliver successful projects [7]. It is the development of these characteristics in tertiary level engineering students that is the aim of project management teaching. It is one thing to recognise this need [8], what is not clear is how effective this work is, consequently study in this area would appear worthwhile. The teaching of transferable skills is discussed widely in the literature. Although acknowledged as important for an adaptable workforce, there is often an incoherent approach to the development and assessment of the skills [9]. They are often perceived by students as add-ons or gap fillers and consequently dont receive the required level of student attention. On graduation though, research suggests that students value transferable skills more highly, yet believe their ability is below that needed [10]. This can be viewed as a missed opportunity. The context of the transferable skills needs to be clearly explained for student mastery to be achieved. An approach to achieving this is through group work [11]. A critical feature of the group work, along with a robust and aligned design, is the need to provide feedback opportunities throughout the work such that the participants can capitalise on them and improve their transferable skills. As engineering faculty work towards more project and problem based curricula, the scope for developing transferable skills, especially in areas such as project management [12], is greatly increased. The problem provides the context and the justification, the faculty and the learning environment the support. With these in place, there is a sound foundation on which to build.
The results discussed in this paper are the initial findings from the exploratory study. Further work is planned to develop understanding in this area.
4.2 Important Features of Project Management With the importance of project management within engineering seen as high by the majority of the respondents, the survey asked students to rank, in order of importance, 10 key features of the project management discipline. The results are presented in Table 1. The results indicate a strong awareness of the importance of the softer skills with 3 of the top 4 rankings featuring people focused attributes rather than the more mechanistic side of project management. Although there is strictly no correct order, it was also encouraging to see the front end features that provide the foundation for successful project execution, namely planning and budget preparation, ranked 2 and 4 respectively. The reflective task of learning from previous projects was considered the least important. In reality, this is perhaps one of the most overlooked features of good project management practice as it can promote a learning culture throughout an organisation, helping to keep the organisation aware and effective. Ranking 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 Feature of Project Management Communication Leadership Planning Teamwork Budget Preparation Project Control Risk Management Developing an Agreed Specification Strategic Alignment Learning from Previous Projects TABLE 1. Ranking of Project Management Features As may be expected in the light of the previous discussion, the key skills the students felt they had developed included leadership, communication and teamwork along with being able to plan, control and assess risk in projects. This blend provides a sound grounding that has the potential to be effective in a job in industry. The skills identified as still being needed were generally related to finance, leadership and getting more practical experience. More understanding about the routes to accreditation reinforced the interest expressed in project management as a potential career. An interesting observation was that several of the comments made were self-reflective indicating that students were thinking about their own personal situations. 4.3 Project Management Learning Experience Addressing the issue of transferable skills, 69% of the respondents agreed that studying project management helped the development of these skills. Communication, group work and leadership skills were all identified under this heading. A problem-based learning assignment was identified by many as one of the most valuable experiences in the project management class. Students liked that it attempted to provide a realistic scenario in which they could use their new found knowledge and develop the appropriate skills to match. Two student comments captured the general feeling: We put the theory and practice together the group work was REAL project management practice There were people in the group where I could help them as well as they could help me. When looking at the least valuable features of the project management teaching and learning, the consensus was generally that the course was hard work and that there were too many assignments. This is a common complaint, yet assignments are necessary to achieve competence. It certainly gives the teaching staff something to think about, although students often reflect that the hard work was worth it when they reach graduation. The group work mentioned so favourably earlier, can also be a source of trouble. Group work was identified as one of the least valuable features as group tensions resulted in what students perceived to be a poorer quality learning experience. This issue is always a challenge, particularly when the students are so culturally diverse. The dysfunctional nature of some groups
suggests that students need some form of induction that will help them relate group work to transferable skill development at an earlier stage. When asked what could have supported the students study more effectively, the primary suggestion was greater use of, and reference to, case studies and real project stories. This is an area that needs to be addressed globally as there is currently no real database of project management case studies that is easily accessible to both staff and students. A resource of this nature could be very valuable. Courses in project management software were also identified, but they should be considered as separate workshops outside the core curriculum.
[10] G. Nabi and D. Bagley, Graduates Perceptions of Transferable Personal Skills and Future Career Preparation in the UK, Career Development International, 3, 1, 31 (1998) [11] P Humphreys et al, Developing Transferable Groupwork Skills for Engineering Students, International Journal of Engineering Education, 17, 1, 59-66, (2001) [12] K. Abernethy et al, Teaching Project Management: An Experiential Approach, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22, 3, 198-205, (2007)