Four Paths of Influence Kenneth Leithwood
Four Paths of Influence Kenneth Leithwood
Four Paths of Influence Kenneth Leithwood
An Evidence-based Perspective
Kenneth Leithwood
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) University of Toronto
What We Know About the Size of Leadership Effects The Qualitative Evidence
Qualitative case studies of exceptional or
turnaround schools (e.g., Reitzug & Patterson, 1998) Leadership succession studies (e.g., Hargreaves & Moore, 2004)
What pathways does leadership influence travel when it has an impact on student learning?
How Leadership Influences Student Learning Ken Leithwood
Rational Path
School-wide Experience
Leadership Practices
Family Path
Consequential Variables
In the classroom
instructional time content coverage instructional quality diagnostic adaptation
In the school
academic press disciplinary climate
Calls for leaders knowledge of the technical core and expert problem-solving processes
Consequential Variables
Consequential Variables
In class Instructional time Complexity of teachers workload In school Calls for leaders Professional networks to engage in Structures to support holistic systems
collaboration
thinking
This pathway also influences staffs understanding of students social capital useful for their learning
How Leadership Influences Student Learning Ken Leithwood
Consequential Variables
Calls for leaders understanding of student learning as co-produced by families and schools
Group Goals
Vision
Setting Directions
Expectations
Communication
Intellectual Stimulation
Modeling
Developing People
Individualized Support
Culture
Structures
Connections
Resource Allocation
Staffing
Buffering
Monitoring
Leadership Practices
School
Q1 Q2 Q3
4.5
4 Q4 3.5 Q5
Other S A
Sch Team
Principal
Leadership Sources
Tea Role
Student
Ind Par
Par Adv
District
Ind Tea
Planful Alignment
Spontaneous Misalignment
Spontaneous Alignment
Academic Optimism as the Dependent Variable Hoy, Tarter & Woolfolk Hoy (2006)
Faculty trust in parents and students Teachers collective efficacy Academic emphasis
Strong effects on student achievement in reading, writing, social studies, science and math
Spontaneous Misalignment
4.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
0.00 1 2 3 4
Optimism Pessimism
0.00
4
Optimism Pessimism