Emergency-Motion-To-Recuse Judge

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA William M. Windsor, Plaintiff ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ) ) 2011cv20 2!

" #$lton Co$nt%, Offic& of t'& #$lton Co$nt% ) (istrict Attorn&%, Pa$l )o*ard, +r., C%nt'ia ) N*o,oc'a, Naomi #$d-&, .&/&cca 0&&l, ) Wav&rl% 1&ttl&s, Li&$t&nant 2n-lis', (&3$t% 4&tts, ) (&3$t% .o%&, 1t&v& 4road/&nt, and 5n,no*n ) (o&s, ) (&f&ndants ) ) PLAINTIFF WILLIAM M. WINDSORS EMERGENCY MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE JERRY W. BAXTER Com&s No* Plaintiff William M. Windsor 67Windsor8 or 7Plaintiff8), and as,s t'at +&rr% W. 4a9t&r 67+W48) /& r&mov&d:r&c$s&d:dis;$alifi&d from t'& a/ov& &ntitl&d matt&r 3$rs$ant to .$l& 2< of t'& 5niform 1$3&rior Co$rt .$l&s 6751C.8), Canons 1, 2, and " of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct, all ot'&r r&l&vant stat$tor% and cas& la*, as *&ll as t'& #irst, #ift', 2i-'t', and #o$rt&&nt' Am&ndm&nts to t'& 5nit&d 1tat&s Constit$tion, t'& ($& Proc&ss Cla$s& of t'& #ift' Am&ndm&nt to t'& 5.1. Constit$tion, t'& Constit$tion of t'& 1tat& of =&or-ia, and t'& Co$rt>s in'&r&nt 3o*&rs. 4as&d $3on t'is motion, t'& attac'&d Affidavit of Pr&?$dic& 629'i/it A), and &9'i/its '&r&to, Windsor mov&s for r&c$sal of +W4
1

from all f$rt'&r 3roc&&din-s in t'&s& matt&rs. T'& filin- and 3r&s&ntation of t'is Motion is ta,in- 3lac& not lat&r t'an fiv& 6<) da%s aft&r Windsor first l&arn&d of t'& -ro$nds for dis;$alification at t'& )&arin- on Octo/&r @, 2011. 1. As r&;$ir&d /% 51C. .$l& 2<.2, t'& accom3an%in- affidavits

attac'&d '&r&to cl&arl% stat& t'& facts and r&asons for t'& /&li&f t'at /ias or 3r&?$dic& &9ists, /&in- d&finit& and s3&cific as to tim&, 3lac&, 3&rsons and circ$mstanc&s of &9tra ?$dicial cond$ct or stat&m&nts, *'ic' d&monstrat& &it'&r /ias in favor of adv&rs& 3arti&s and 3r&?$dic& to*ard t'& movin- 3art% in 3artic$lar, and a s%st&matic 3att&rn of 3r&?$dicial cond$ct to*ard 3&rsons similarl% sit$at&d to t'& movin- 3art%, *'ic' *o$ld infl$&nc& t'& ?$d-& and im3&d& or 3r&v&nt im3artialit% in t'at action. 2. T'is Motion m&&ts t'& r&;$ir&m&nts of 51C. .$l& 2<. A61)B T'&

motion is tim&l%C A62)B t'& Affidavit is l&-al s$ffici&ntC and A6")B ass$min- an% of t'& facts all&-&d in t'& affidavit to /& tr$&, r&c$sal is *arrant&d. 61&& Morgan v. Propst, "01 =a.A33. !02 6=a.A33. 11:0 :200D)C Christensen v. State, 2!< =a. A33. 1 <, 1@1 610) 6a) 6<"@ 122d !! ) 62000)C Hunnicutt v. Hunnicutt, 2!E =a. <1 62E" 1.2.2d ED1) 61DE1).) ". +W4 is no* o/li-at&d to 'av& anot'&r ?$d-& '&ar t'is motion.

FTo *arrant dis;$alification of a trial +$d-& t'& affidavit s$33ortin- t'& r&c$sal motion Gm$st -iv& fair s$33ort to t'& c'ar-& of a /&nt of mind t'at
2

ma% 3r&v&nt or im3&d& im3artialit% of ?$d-m&nt.G Berger v. United States, 2<< 5.1. 22, ""H"! 6!1 1. Ct. 2"0, < L. 2d. !E1) 61D21).F Jones v. State, 2!@ =a. 2 E, 2@1 6!) 62@< 1.2.2d @) 61DE1), c&rt. d&n. !<! 5.1. E1@ 6102 1. Ct. D!, @0 L. 2d. 2d E ). W'&n a trial +$d-& in a cas& 3&ndin- in t'at co$rt is 3r&s&nt&d *it' a motion to r&c$s& accom3ani&d /% an affidavit, t'& +$d-&Gs d$t% *ill /& limit&d to 3assin- $3on t'& l&-al s$ffici&nc% of t'& affidavit, and if, ass$min- all t'& facts all&-&d in t'& affidavit to /& tr$&, r&c$sal *o$ld /& *arrant&d, t'&n anot'&r +$d-& m$st /& assi-n&d to '&ar t'& motion to r&c$s&.... it is as m$c' t'& d$t% of a +$d-& not to -rant t'& motion to r&c$s& *'&n t'& motion is l&-all% ins$ffici&nt as it is to r&c$s& *'&n t'& motion is m&ritorio$sC nor do&s t'& sim3l& filin- of an affidavit a$tomaticall% dis;$alif% a +$d-&. ACit.BF State v. Fleming, 2!< =a. @00 61), @02 62 @ 1.2.2d 20@) 61DE0). 1&& also Hardman v. Hardman, 1E< =a. A33. <1D, <20 6") 6" ! 1.2.2d !<) 61DEE). FACTUAL BACKGROUND !. T'& fact$al /ac,-ro$nd in t'is cas& is r&cit&d in t'& Affidavit of

Pr&?$dic& 629'i/it A. 1&& 3ara-ra3's 10 to <D.) JWB IS BIASED AGAINST WINDSOR AND PREJUDICED FOR THE DEFENDANTS AND FELLOW JUDGES. <. Pr&?$dic& and /ias ma% /& &it'&r for or a-ainst. In t'& instant action,

t'&r& is /ot'. +W4 'as anta-onistic /ias to*ard Windsor. +W4 'as a 3r&?$dic& in favor of t'& (&f&ndants and f&llo* ?$d-&s. . Plain and sim3l&, +W4 violat&d Windsor>s ri-'ts, '&ld a /o-$s

'&arin- t'at did not 3rovid& Windsor t'& o33ort$nit% to /& '&ard, i-nor&d t'& tr$t' t'at '& *as o/li-at&d to acc&3t, and iss$&d an ord&r /&ca$s& '& *ant&d to dama-& Windsor to sto3 'im from &93osin- corr$3tion in t'& l&-al s%st&m in #$lton
"

Co$nt%. +W4 did not d&monstrat& an o$nc& of im3artialit% or fairn&ss. )is Octo/&r @, 2011 O.(2. is ill&-al and totall% $nfo$nd&d. +W4>s &9tr&m& /ias is a33ar&nt in 'is Ord&r and *'at too, 3lac& at t'& Octo/&r @, 2011 )&arin67)&arin-8). 61&& 29'i/it 1"! to t'& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor and 3ara-ra3's "EH<E to t'& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit.) @. +W4 'ad a 3r&conc&iv&d id&a of t'is civil action from information

t'at 'as com& from o$tsid& t'& cas&. At t'& )&arin-, +W4 mad& stat&m&nts a/o$t Windsor>s f&d&ral co$rt liti-ation t'at *as not an%*'&r& to /& fo$nd in t'& r&cord /&for& t'& co$rt. T'is *as cl&arl% &9traH?$dicial information t'at f&d 'is /ias. E. T'&r& *as no affidavit and no t&stimon% from an%on& /$t Windsor

/&for& +W4 *'&n '& d&fam&d Windsor in 'is co$rt ord&r and mad& 'is void of im3artialit% 3art of t'& 3$/lic r&cord. +W4 3rov&d 'is &9traH?$dicial /ias a-ainst Windsor /% i-norin- t'& facts and inv&ntin- 'is o*n facts. +WM is o/li-at&d to acc&3t Windsor>s $ncontrov&rt&d stat&m&nts as fact, /$t '& i-nor&d t'is most f$ndam&ntal o/li-ation of a ?$d-&. 7Iall *itn&ss&s ar& 3r&s$m&d /% t'& tri&r of fact to s3&a, t'& tr$t' $nl&ss im3&ac'&d /% som& mann&r 3r&scri/&d /% la*. Cupp v. Naughten, !1! 5. 1. 1!1, 1!"H1!@ 6D! 1C "D , "E L22d " E) 61D@")C Noggle v. State, 2< =a. "E", "E<H"E 6"!D 122d 1@<) 61DE ).8 6Bitt Intl. Co., Inc. v. Fletcher, 2<D =a.A33. !0 , <@@ 1.2.2d 2@ 6=a.A33. 02:0":200").)

D.

+W4 committ&d 3&r?$r% in 'is Octo/&r @, 2011 Ord&r 67O.(2.8).

AT*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor, JJ@! and E2.B +W4 'as stat&d t'at Windsor>s cond$ct in t'is Co$rt incl$d&s 7vol$mino$s, m&ritl&ss filin-s.8 T'is is fals& and is &asil% 3rov&n fals& /% t'& r&cord. Ot'&r t'an t'& V&rifi&d Com3laint and #irst Am&nd&d V&rifi&d Com3laint, Windsor fil&d onl% fiv& motions totalin- 1 3a-&s. 61&& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor, K@!.) Windsor fil&d ! doc$m&nts totalin- @2 3a-&s in r&s3ons&s to motions and filin-s of t'& (&f&ndants. 61&& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor, K@<.) 10. 11. EE 3a-&s dot' not vol$mino$s ma,&. +W4 did not o/?&ct to an% of t'&s& filin-s in 'is ord&rs. T'&r& *as

not'in- im3ro3&r *it' an% of t'&s& filin-s. 12. Windsor also fil&d s*orn affidavits *it' &vid&nc&. No ?$d-& can 'av&

a valid o/?&ction to &vid&nc&. Windsor fil&d t'& &vid&nc& so t'at all affidavits 3r&s&nt&d to t'& =rand +$r% *o$ld /& 3art of t'& r&cord and so no on& co$ld sto3 Windsor from -&ttin- si-nificant &vid&nc& into t'& r&cord. 1". No 'on&st ?$d-& co$ld sa% t'is *as vol$mino$s. And t'&r& *as

not'in- at all m&ritl&ss in an%t'in- t'at Windsor fil&d. Not'in- *as controv&rt&d, so Windsor>s facts *&r& t'& onl% facts /&for& t'& Co$rt.
<

1!.

+W4>s O.(2. is on& /i- o/str$ction of ?$stic&. )& cit&d on& and

onl% on& cas& for ?$stification for s$a s3ont& dismissal, and t'& cas& do&s not a33l%. In fact, t'&r& 'as n&v&r /&&n a cas& in t'& =&or-ia a33&llat& co$rts t'at *o$ld ?$stif% s$c' a dismissal. 29'i/it 1" to t'& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor is t'& citation to &v&r% =&or-ia a33&llat& cas& r&t$rn&d /% a s&arc' of 7dismiss8 *it'in < *ords of 7s$a s3ont&.8 Non& of t'&s& cas&s 3rovid& t'at t'is O.(2. is 3&rmissi/l& $nd&r =&or-ia la*. 1<. In t'& O.(2., +W4 claims '& can ta,& 7?$dicial notic&8 of 3r&vio$s

la*s$its, /$t t'& r$l&s and t'& cas& la* on ?$dicial notic& 'av& to /& ,no*n /% +W4, and ?$dicial notic& ma% not /& ta,&n. T'& 3r&vio$s la*s$its do not constit$t& ,no*l&d-& of t'& -&n&ral 3$/lic, ar& not r&f&r&nc& mat&rial, and ar& not matt&rs ,no*n to t'& ?$d-&. In addition, Windsor *as not -iv&n notic& or an o33ort$nit% to /& '&ard on *'&t'&r ?$dicial notic& co$ld /& ta,&n. +W4>s O.(2. indicat&s t'at '& *as ?$stif%in- 'is ord&r /as&d $3on information in ot'&r la*s$its, /$t s$c' iss$&s ar& a matt&r of 3roof t'at cannot /& ?$diciall% notic&d, and Windsor mad& it cl&ar in affidavits and at t'& )&arin- t'at all of t'at *as dis3$t&d. In addition, co$rt doc$m&nts 'av& to /& c&rtifi&d, and non& of t'&s& *&r&. T'& rol& of ?$dicial notic& is to &liminat& formal 3roof as toL 61) Fmatt&rs *'ic' t'& -&n&ral 3$/lic 'as common ,no*l&d-&FC 62)Ffacts *'ic' ar& r&adil% asc&rtaina/l& /% r&f&r&nc& to som& r&lia/l& so$rc&, and ar& /&%ond dis3$t&FC and 6") Fmatt&rs *'ic' ar& *it'in t'& s3&cial 3rovinc& of t'&

?$d-&.F =r&&n, =a. La* of 2vid&nc& 6!t' &d.), J !C s&& also In the Interest o S. M., 1 D =a. A33. " !, " 6"12 1.2.2d E2D) 61DE")C Batson!Coo" Co. v. Shiple#, 1"! =a. A33. 210, 212 621! 1.2.2d 1@ ) 61D@<). In t'is cas&, t'& matt&r t'at 3laintiff *ants ?$diciall% notic&d falls o$tsid& O.C.=.A. J 2!H1H!. T'& iss$& is in dis3$t& and is a matt&r of 3roof. T'$s, it *as 3ro3&r for t'& trial co$rt not to ta,& ?$dicial notic& of t'is iss$&. C&rtifi&d co3i&s of s$c' 3l&adin-s *o$ld 'av& to /& t&nd&r&d into &vid&nc& and r&c&iv&d as 3rimar% &vid&nc& for t'& &9'i/it to /& &vid&nc& /&for& t'& co$rt. O.C.=.A. J 2!H<H"1C Bell v. Cone, 20E =a. ! @ 6 @ 1.2.2d <<E) 61D<1)C Commerce Prop. v. $inthicum, 20D =a. A33. E<" 61) 6!"! 1.2.2d @ D) 61DD")C %utland v. Cit# o &u'lin, <0 =a. A33. 2!2 61@@ 1.2. E1D) 61D"!)C cf. Mason v. State, 1D@ =a. A33. <"! 6"DE 1.2.2d E22) 61DD0)C (enins v. Bo#d, 1 =a. A33. E!", E!! 62) 6"0< 1.2.2d "D1) 61DE")C Mood# v. %oads )c. o *ppling Count#, 2D =a. A33. 21 611" 1.2. 10") 61D22). W'&n a co3% of a trial co$rt r&cord is t&nd&r&d into &vid&nc&, t&stimon% as to *'at is contain&d in s$c' r&cord is s$/?&ct to a 'i-'&st and /&st &vid&nc& o/?&ction, as *&ll as a '&arsa% o/?&ction. $ipscom' v. State, 1D! =a. A33. <@ 6"D1 1.2.2d @@") 61DD0). 6Nations'an" v. +uc"er, 2"1 =a.A33. 22, <00 1.2.2d "@E 6=a.A33. 0":2<:1DDE).) 61&& also Bre,ster v. State, E! 1.2.2d "0D, "00 =a.A33. 1!" 6=a.A33. 0D:22:200D).) It also a33&ars t'at t'& trial co$rt im3ro3&rl% too, ?$dicial notic& of t'& s$mmar% ?$d-m&nt ord&r in t'& Till&% action *it'o$t -ivin- t'& )a%-oods notic& and an o33ort$nit% to /& '&ard r&-ardin- *'&t'&r ?$dicial notic& s'o$ld /& ta,&n. 61&& Fit-patric" v. Harrison, "00 =a. A33. @2, @" n.1 6 E 122d "22) 6200D).) 6Ha#good v. Head, No. A10A0@< 6=a.A33. 0@:0D:2010).) 61&& also Jones v. State, 2@2 =a. D00, D01HD0" 62) 6<"@ 122d E0) 62000)C (raves v. State 2 D =a. @@2 at @@< 6!)6a), 6<0! 122d @D) 61DDE)C Ste,art v. State, 2EE =a. A33. @"<, @"@H@"E 6") 6 << 122d "2E) 6200@)C Cantrell v. State, @" 1.2.2d "2, 2D< =a.A33. "! 6=a.A33. 01:2":200D).) 1 . +W4 claim&d in t'& O.(2. t'at '& consid&r&d t'& &ntir& r&cord, as

*&ll as t'& ar-$m&nt and t&stimon% at t'& '&arin- and d&cid&d t'& cas& *as frivolo$s. T'is is 3&r?$r%. +W4 ,no*s t'& cas& isn>t frivolo$s. )& lcommitt&d
@

3&r?$r%. If '& consid&r&d t'& r&cord, '& co$ld onl% consid&r Windsor>s s*orn &vid&nc& as t'& (&f&ndants 'ad no admissi/l& &vid&nc& and no affidavits or t&stimon% of an% t%3&. Windsor>s s*orn t&stimon% &sta/lis'&d t'at &v&r% fact in t'& #irst Am&nd&d V&rifi&d Com3laint m$st /& ta,&n as tr$&. Windsor>s s*orn t&stimon% &93lain&d t'& crim&s and *ron-doin- in t'& f&d&ral co$rts t'at 3r&c&d&d Windsor>s s$/missions to t'& =rand +$r%. Windsor>s s*orn t&stimon% d&tail&d criminal rac,&t&&rin- /% t'& (&f&ndantsC crim&s a-ainst Windsor of o/str$ction of ?$stic&, ?$r% tam3&rin-, a/$s& of 3roc&ss, and mor& /% (&f&ndantsC t'&ft of mailC crim&s /% t'& Offic& of t'& Cl&r, of t'& Co$rtC and mor&. 1@. T'& )&arin- *as a 0an-aroo Co$rt. Windsor *as s$dd&nl% limit&d to

"0 min$t&s aft&r comm$nicatin- to +W4 da%s /&for& t'at '& antici3at&d t'& '&arin- *o$ld last for s&v&ral da%s. 629'i/it 1<@ to t'& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor is a tr$& and corr&ct co3% of an &mail &9c'an-& /&t*&&n Windsor and +W4>s staff on Octo/&r 2 and ", 2011.) At t'& )&arin-, Windsor *as d&ni&d t'& ri-'t to /& s*orn in to t&stif%. T'& tim& limit mad& it im3ossi/l& for Windsor to 3r&s&nt t'& &vid&nc& '& s3&nt da%s ass&m/lin- and co3%in-. +W4 r&f$s&d to r&;$ir& s$/3o&na&d *itn&ss&s to 'onor t'&ir validl%Hs&rv&d s$/3o&nas. +W4 i-nor&d t'& facts and t'& la* and imm&diat&l% r$l&d a-ainst Windsor and

dismiss&d t'& cas& *it' no *arnin- *'atso&v&r. 53on information and /&li&f, t'& O.(2. *as *ritt&n /&for& t'& )&arin- *as '&ld. 1E. +W4>s O.(2. 'as clos&d t'& co$rt'o$s& doors to Windsor. +W4

*as a*ar& from Windsor>s s*orn affidavits t'at '& co$ld not 3ossi/l% 3ost a M<0,000 /ond, and +W4 ord&r&d s$c' a /ond as a 3r&r&;$isit& to an% f$t$r& civil action. T'is m&ans Windsor can n&v&r fil& anot'&r civil action. 1D. +W4 'as d&monstrat&d to Windsor t'at '& 'as a d&&3Hs&at&d /ias and

anta-onism a-ainst an%on& *'o *o$ld 'av& t'& a$dacit% to s$& ?$d-&s. 53on information and /&li&d, attorn&% +W4 'as a /ias a-ainst all nonHattorn&% 3ro s& 3laintiffs. 20. +W4 'as an $nfavora/l& o3inion a/o$t Windsor t'at is *ron-f$l and

ina33ro3riat&. It is $nd&s&rv&d, and it r&sts $3on ,no*l&d-& t'at +W4 o$-'t not to 3oss&ss. It is &9c&ssiv& in d&-r&&. 21. Windsor 'as not /&&n tr&at&d fairl% /% +W4. +W4 'as not

d&monstrat&d t'& im3artialit% r&;$ir&d of a ?$d-&. T'& O.(2. iss$&d /% +W4 s'o*s t'is. 22. Canon " 62) of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct s'o$ld /& consid&r&d in

d&t&rminin- *'&t'&r an affidavit s$33ortin- a motion to r&c$s& is l&-all% s$ffici&nt and s&ts fort' facts t'at, if tr$&, *arrant r&c$sal. Canon " 62) 6a) 3rovid&s, in
D

3&rtin&nt 3artL F+$d-&s s'all dis;$alif% t'&ms&lv&s in an% 3roc&&din- in *'ic' t'&ir im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d, incl$din- /$t not limit&d to instanc&s *'&r& . . . t'& ?$d-& 'as a 3&rsonal /ias or 3r&?$dic& conc&rnin- . . . a 3art%Gs la*%&r.F 6Morgan v. Propst, "01 =a.A33. !02 6=a.A33. 11:0 :200D).) 2". +W4 &nt&r&d t'is civil action *it' a clos&d mind and com3l&t& and

total /ias a-ainst Windsor. 2!. T'is motion as,s for r&c$sal:r&moval:dis;$alification of +W4 /as&d

on a n$m/&r of -ro$ndsL 61) O/vio$s /ias a-ainst Windsor and, at t'& v&r% l&ast, t'& a33&aranc& of im3artialit%C 62) violation of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ctC 6") violation of Windsor>s ri-'ts to d$& 3roc&ss and Constit$tional and civil ri-'tsC 6!) t'& fact t'at +W4 *ill no* /& a *itn&ss and s'o$ld also /&com& a (&f&ndantC and mor&. JWB HAS DEMONSTRATED BIAS AGAINST WINDSOR AND THE APPEARANCE OF A LACK OF IMPARTIALITY 2<. T'& /ias of +W4 is int&ns&.

T'& all&-&d /ias of t'& ?$d-& m$st /&AB Fof s$c' a nat$r& and int&nsit% to 3r&v&nt t'& d&f&ndant from o/tainin- a trial $ninfl$&nc&d /% t'& co$rtGs 3r&?$d-m&nt. To *arrant dis;$alification of a trial ?$d-& t'& affidavit s$33ortin- t'& r&c$sal motion m$st -iv& fair s$33ort to t'& c'ar-& of a /&nt of mind t'at ma% 3r&v&nt or im3&d& im3artialit% of ?$d-m&nt.F 6(illis v. Cit# o .a#cross, 2!@ =a. A33. 11D, 122 6<!" 122d !2") 62000) =illis, s$3ra at 120 6;$otin- Birt v. State, 2< =a. !E", !E 6!) 6"<0 122d 2!1) 61DE )).)
10

2 .

An o/?&ctiv& o/s&rv&r, la% o/s&rv&r, and:or disint&r&st&d o/s&rv&r

m$st &nt&rtain si-nificant do$/t of t'& im3artialit% of +W4. 7A ?$d-& s'all dis;$alif% 'ims&lf or '&rs&lf in a 3roc&&din- in *'ic' t'& ?$d-&>s im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d.8 6$ite"# v. U.S., 11! 1.Ct. 11!@, 11 2 61DD!)C Par"er v. Connors Steel Co., E<< #.2d 1<10 611t' Cir.) 61DEE) citin- Potashnic" v. Port Cit# Const. Co., 0D #.2d 1101, 1111 6<t' Cir.), c&rt. d&ni&d, !!D 5.1. E20, 101 1.Ct. @E, L.2d. 2d 22 61DE0).)1 FW'&n a trial ?$d-& in a cas& 3&ndin- in t'at co$rt is 3r&s&nt&d *it' a motion to r&c$s& accom3ani&d /% an affidavit, t'& ?$d-&Gs d$t% *ill /& limit&d to 3assin- $3on t'& l&-al s$ffici&nc% of t'& affidavit, and if, ass$min- all t'& facts all&-&d in t'& affidavit to /& tr$&, r&c$sal *o$ld /& *arrant&d, t'&n anot'&r ?$d-& m$st /& assi-n&d to '&ar t'& motion to r&c$s&.F 6Citation and 3$nct$ation omitt&d.) State v. &avis, 159 Ga. App. 537, <"D 6") 6284 SE2d 51) 61DE1). Canon " C. 61) 6a) of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct stat&sL F+$d-&s s'o$ld dis;$alif% t'&ms&lv&s in 3roc&&din-s in *'ic' t'&ir im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d, incl$din- /$t not limit&d to instanc& *'&r&L . . . t'& ?$d-& 'as a 3&rsonal /ias or 3r&?$dic& conc&rnin- a 3art% or a 3art%Gs la*%&r . . . .F FW& int&r3r&t t'& *ord Gs'o$ldG to m&an Gs'allG in t'& cont&9t of t'is r&;$ir&m&nt.F Savage v. Savage, 234 Ga. 853, E< 6218 SE2d 568) 61D@<). Houston v. Cavanagh et al., 6199 Ga. App. 387), 6405 SE2d 105), 61DD1). 2@. If *& a33l% t'& r&asona/l& 3&rson anal%sis to t'is sit$ation, an%

r&asona/l& 3&rson *o$ld ;$&stion t'& im3artialit% of +W4.


2E.

T'& actions of +W4 dis3la%&d d&&3Hs&at&d and $n&;$ivocal

anta-onism t'at *o$ld r&nd&r fair ?$d-m&nt im3ossi/l&. $ite"# v. United States, <10 5.1. <!0, << , 11! 1. Ct. 11!@, 11<E, 12@ L. 2d. 2d !@! 61DD!).
1

T'& =&or-ia 1$3r&m& Co$rt 'ad ado3t&d t'& f&d&ral r$l& on motions to r&c$s& in State v. Fleming, 2!< =a. @00, @02 61) 62 @ 1.2.2d 20@) 61DE0).

11

2D.

T'& av&ra-& r&asona/l& 3&rson, ,no*in- all t'& facts, *o$ld &asil%

concl$d& t'at +W4>s im3artialit% co$ld /& ;$&stion&d, t'at +W4 cannot 3ossi/l% -iv& Windsor a fair and im3artial '&arin-, and t'at '& s'o$ld /& r&mov&d and r&3lac&d /% an im3artial ?$d-&. 67T'& 3ro/a/ilit% of act$al /ias on t'& 3art of t'& ?$d-& . . . is too 'i-' to /& constit$tionall% tol&ra/l&8)C Berger v. United States, 2<< 5.1. 22, ""H"! 61D21)C Potashnic" v. Port Cit# Constr. Co., 0D #.2d 1101, 1111 6<t' Cir. 1DE0) 67An% ;$&stion of a ?$d-&>s im3artialit% t'r&at&ns t'& 3$rit% of t'& ?$dicial 3roc&ss and its instit$tions8)C /ing v. State, 2! =a. "E , "EDHD0, 2@1 1.2.2d "0 61DE0)C Hall v. Small Bus. *dmin., D< #.2d 1@<, 1@D 6<t' Cir. 1DE")C United States v. Colum'ia Broad. S#s., Inc., !D@ #.2d 10@, 10D 6<t' Cir. 1D@!)C Stephens v. Stephens, 2!D =a. @00, @02, 2D2 1.2.2d ED, D1 61DE2)C Isaacs v. State, 2<@ =a. 12 , 12@, "<< 1.2.2d !! 61DE@). Im3artialit% of t'& +$d-& is t'& /&droc, of fairn&ss in o$r ?$dicial s%st&m. W'&r& it mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d, t'& +$d-& s'o$ld dis;$alif% or /& r&c$s&d. Houston v. Cavanagh, 1DD =a. A33. "E@, "EE 6!0< 1.2.2d 10<) 61DD1). 2v&n t'& a33&aranc& of t'& lac, of im3artialit%, if /as&d on a r&asona/l& /&li&f s$33ort&d /% fact, mandat&s t'at anot'&r +$d-& tr% t'& cas&. 51C. 2< im3l&m&nts t'& 'i-' standard of Canon " of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct and m$st /& scr$3$lo$sl% ad'&r&d to. 6BU+$0% v. BI10N S2F+.*%0, !@" 1.2.2d 1 E, 222 =a. A33. EE 60 :0@:D ).) T'& n&c&ssit% for r&c$sal is not limit&d to circ$mstanc&s *'&r& act$al /ias 'as /&&n d&monstrat&d. Inst&ad, r&c$sal is also r&;$ir&d, $nd&r ?$dicial &t'ics standards, *'&n&v&r a trial ?$d-&Gs Fim3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d.F 6Birt v. State, 2< =a. !E" 6!) 6"<0 122d 2!1) 61DE ).) "0. T'& Affidavit of Pr&?$dic& stat&s v&r% cl&arl% t'& facts and r&asons for

t'& /&li&f t'at /ias and 3r&?$dic& &9ists. (at&s, tim&s, 3lac&s, circ$mstanc&s, and stat&m&nts ar& it&miN&d. T'is is P2.1ONAL /ias /% +W4, not ?$dicial /ias. )&
12

'as a /ias a-ainst Windsor t'at is not ca$s&d /% an%t'in- t'at 'a33&n&d /&t*&&n t'& tim& t'& Civil Action *as fil&d on 1&3t&m/&r 2@, 2011 and t'& )&arin- on Octo/&r @, 2011. Windsor 'ad n&v&r '&ard of +W4 /&for& 1&3t&m/&r 2@, and t'&% n&v&r s3o,& /&for& t'& Octo/&r @ )&arin-. "1. +W4 &sta/lis'&d a cl&arl% fi9&d vi&* a/o$t s$/stantiv& 3&ndin- trial

matt&rs, so t'is m$st rais& conc&rns a/o$t t'& 7a33&aranc& of im3ro3ri&t%,8 a standard t'at m$st /& saf&-$ard&d $nd&r a33lica/l& r&c$sal la*. 53on information and /&li&d, +W4 'ad &9H3art& conv&rsations *it' 3&o3l& a/o$t Windsor. "2. +W4 'as &sta/lis'&d a 3osition in t'is 3roc&&din- t'at Windsor m$st

not /& allo*&d to accom3lis' an%t'in- as +W4 m$st s'i&ld t'& &vilHdo&rs. FT'& n&$tralit% r&;$ir&m&nt '&l3s to -$arant&& t'at lif&, li/&rt%, or 3ro3&rt% *ill not /& ta,&n on t'& /asis of an &rron&o$s or distort&d conc&3tion of t'& facts or t'& la*.F T'is is a33lica/l& to +W4 /% a33lication of Articl& VI of t'& 5nit&d 1tat&s Constit$tion and Stone v Po,ell, !2E 51 ! <, !E" n. "<, D 1. Ct. "0"@, !D L. 2d. 2d 10 @ 61D@ ). "". +W4 $s&d a ton& of Fdisdain and cont&m3tF at t'& )&arin-. )&

&93r&ss&d in 'is /&'avior t'at '& /asicall% *as not list&nin- to t'& ar-$m&nt and t'at Windsor co$ld 'av& sto33&d ar-$in- /&for& '& /&-an. W'&n +W4 concl$d&d t'& '&arin- /% t&llin- Windsor to 7-&t a lif&,8 '& 3rov&d t'at 'is /ias a-ainst Windsor *as &9tr&m&, &9traH?$dicial, and *as foc$s&d on *'at Windsor 'as /&&n att&m3tin- to do 3rior to t'is Civil Action. +W4 mad& it cr%stal cl&ar t'at '&
1"

disa33rov&d of Windsor 'ims&lf. +W4>s foc$s on &9traH?$dicial matt&rs s'o*&d no foc$s *'atso&v&r on t'& r&l&vant iss$&s /&for& t'& Co$rt. JWB HAS VIOLATED THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT. "!. Canon 2 of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct 67C+C8) 3rovid&sL 7A ?$d-&

s'o$ld r&s3&ct and com3l% *it' t'& la* and s'o$ld act at all tim&s in a mann&r t'at 3romot&s 3$/lic confid&nc& in t'& int&-rit% and im3artialit% of t'& ?$diciar%.8 2v&r% 3&rson 7'as a constit$tional and stat$tor% ri-'t to an im3artial and fair ?$d-& at all sta-&s of t'& 3roc&&din-.8 $ite"# v U.S., <10 51 <!0 61DD!). "<. +W4 is an &m/arrassm&nt. )& 'as i-nor&d &v&r%t'in- t'at '& is

s*orn to 3rot&ct. )& 'as d&monstrat&d a com3l&t&, total void of im3artialit%. " . FCanon 2 of t'& Cod& of Cond$ct for 5nit&d 1tat&s +$d-&s t&lls ?$d-&s

to Gavoid im3ro3ri&t% and t'& a33&aranc& of im3ro3ri&t% in all activiti&s,G on t'& /&nc' and off.F United States v. Microso t Corp., "! 5.1. A33. (.C. ""0, 2<" #."d "!, 10@ 6(.C. Cir. 2001). "@. +W4 'as i-nor&d &v&r%t'in- t'at '& is s*orn to 3rot&ct. )& 'as

d&monstrat&d a com3l&t&, total void of im3artialit%. "E. Canon "2 r&;$ir&s t'at F+$d-&s s'all dis;$alif% t'&ms&lv&s in an%

3roc&&din- in *'ic' t'&ir im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d. . . .F +W4 fail&d to dis;$alif% 'ims&lf as '& *as r&;$ir&d to do.

1!

"D.

+W4 3r&?$d-&d Windsor as a 3&rson. )& d&cid&d Windsor n&&d&d to

/& &liminat&d /&ca$s& '& 'as /&&n fi-'tin- for ?$stic& a-ainst f&d&ral ?$d-&s. Windsor>s Affidavit of Pr&?$dic& 3rovid&s s$33ort for +W4>s 3r&?$dicial /&nt of mind. A33lica/l& '&r& is Canon "2 *'ic' stat&sL F+$d-&s s'all dis;$alif% t'&ms&lv&s in an% 3roc&&din- in *'ic' t'&ir im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d. . . .F T'& all&-&d /ias of t'& ?$d-& m$st /&L of s$c' a nat$r& and int&nsit% to 3r&v&nt t'& d&f&ndant from o/tainin- a trial $ninfl$&nc&d /% t'& co$rtGs 3r&?$d-m&nt. To *arrant dis;$alification of a trial ?$d-& t'& affidavit s$33ortin- t'& r&c$sal motion m$st -iv& fair s$33ort to t'& c'ar-& of a /&nt of mind t'at ma% 3r&v&nt or im3&d& im3artialit% of ?$d-m&nt. 6Citations and 3$nct$ation omitt&d.) Birt v. State, 2< =a. !E", !E 6!) 6"<0 122d 2!1) 61DE ). 6(illis v. Cit# o .a#cross, 2!@ =a.A33. 11D, <!" 1.2.2d !2" 6=a.A33. 12:01:2000).) !0. +W4>s /ias is &9traH?$dicial. T'& O.(2. 3rov&s t'at +W4 'as /&&n

fi9at&d on information from t'& f&d&ral co$rts t'at is not r&l&vant to t'& iss$&s /&for& t'& Co$rt in t'is matt&r. FATB'& all&-&d /ias m$st st&m from an &9traH?$dicial so$rc& and r&s$lt in an o3inion on t'& m&rits on som& /asis ot'&r t'an *'at t'& ?$d-& l&arn&d from 'is 3artici3ation in t'& cas&.F Birt v. State, 2< =a. !E" at !E< 6!). T'& movant n&&d not s'o* an% act$al im3ro3ri&t% on t'& 3art of t'& trial co$rt ?$d-&. FT'& fact t'at 'is im3artialit% Gmi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&dG s$ffic&s for 'is dis;$alification.F /ing v. State, 2! =a. "E , "D0 6@) 62@1 122d "0) 61DE0). 6(illis v. Cit# o .a#cross, 2!@ =a.A33. 11D, <!" 1.2.2d !2" 6=a.A33. 12:01:2000).) 61&& also Henderson v. Mc1a#, 2 D =a. @, D 62) 6!D! 122d <") 61DDE).) !1. +W4 d&cid&d 'o* '& *o$ld r$l& from information ot'&r t'an *'at '&

l&arn&d in t'is cas&. T'& /ias is so int&ns& t'at Windsor n&v&r 'ad a c'anc& d$& to
1<

t'& 3&rsonal 3r&?$d-m&nt of Windsor t'& 3&rson. +W4 d&cid&d Windsor *as a l&-al t'r&at to 'is ?$dicial and l&-al fri&nds and associat&s, so '& d&vis&d a sc'&m& to sto3 Windsor. Onc& +W4 d&cid&d '& 'ad to sto3 Windsor, t'& facts, t'& la*, and t'& cas& did not matt&r. FIn ord&r to /& dis;$alif%in- t'& all&-&d /ias m$st st&m from an &9traH ?$dicial so$rc& and r&s$lt in an o3inion on t'& m&rits on som& /asis ot'&r t'an *'at t'& ?$d-& l&arn&d from 'is 3artici3ation in t'& cas&. T'& all&-&d /ias of t'& ?$d-& m$st /& of s$c' a nat$r& and int&nsit% to 3r&v&nt t'& 3art% from o/tainin- a trial $ninfl$&nc&d /% t'& co$rtGs 3r&?$d-m&nt.F 6Citations and 3$nct$ation omitt&d.) McBride v. State, 21" =a. A33. E<@, E<D 6!) 6!! 1.2.2d 1D") 61DD!)C Stevens v. M#ers, 1D0 =a. A33. 1 6"@E 1.2.2d ""!) 61DED)C Uni orm Superior Court %ule 2<.2. 6(i'son v. &ecatur Federal, 2"< =a.A33. 1 0, <0E 1.2.2d @EE 6=a.A33. 11:0 :1DDE).) 61&& also Henderson v. Mc1a#, 2 D =a. @, D 62) 6!D! 122d <") 61DDE).) !2. T'& fact t'at 'is im3artialit% 7mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d8

r&;$ir&s dis;$alification. 7Iit is not n&c&ssar% t'at t'&r& /& s'o*n an% act$al im3ro3ri&t% on t'& 3art of t'& trial co$rt +$d-&. T'& fact t'at 'is im3artialit% Omi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d> s$ffic&s for 'is dis;$alification.8 6/ing v. State, 2! =a. "E , "D0 6@) 62@1 1.2.2d "0) 61DE0).F Birt v. State, 2< =a. !E", !E , s$3ra. 1&& also Isaacs v. State, 2<@ =a. 12 6"<< 1.2.2d !!) 61DE@).) 61&& also Jones Count# v. * Mining (roup, $$C, 2E< =a. ! <, ! 6 @E 122d !@!) 6200D).) !". T'& mann&r in *'ic' +W4 'andl&d t'& Octo/&r @, 2011 )&arin-,

stat&m&nts '& mad& as to facts, and 'is r$lin- *arrant r&c$sal. )is cond$ct, stat&m&nts, and r$lin- cam& from &9traH?$dicial so$rc&s. JWB HAS NOW BECOME A WITNESS IN THIS CIVIL ACTION,
1

AND CANON 3 OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT REQUIRES RECUSAL. !!. +W4 'as 'ad &9traH?$dicial comm$nications *it' a 3&rson or 3&rsons

*'o Windsor /&li&v&s ar& 3art of t'& criminal rac,&t&&rin- &nt&r3ris& t'at is on& of t'& iss$&s in t'is Civil Action. Windsor n&&ds to call +W4 as a *itn&ss to d&t&rmin& *'o said *'at, *'&n, *'&r&, and *'%. T'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct, Canon " 62) s3&cifi&sL 61) +$d-&s s'all dis;$alif% t'&ms&lv&s in an% 3roc&&din- in *'ic' t'&ir im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d, incl$din- /$t not limit&d to instanc&s *'&r&L 6/) . . . t'& ?$d-& 'as /&&n a mat&rial *itn&ss conc&rnin- At'& matt&r in controv&rs%C orB 6c) t'& ?$d-&L 6iv) is, to t'& ?$d-&Gs ,no*l&d-&, li,&l% to /& a mat&rial *itn&ss in t'& 3roc&&din-. FAIBt is &l&m&ntar% t'at on& ma% not /& a *itn&ss and a ?$d-& in t'& sam& 3roc&&din-.F 6%ussell v. State, 2" =a. A33. !< 6") 6<12 122d D1") 61DDD).) 1&& also Shoc"le# ) Co. v. Morgan, 10" =a. 1< 6") 62D 12 D!) 61ED@)C Collins v. State, 1!1 =a. A33. 121 62) 62"2 122d "<) 61D@@).) Alt'o$-' t'& ?$d-& in t'is cas& tri&d to 3artition t'& iss$&s on *'ic' s'& *as dis;$alifi&d from t'& iss$&s on *'ic' s'& did not t&stif%, all t'&s& iss$&s aros& in t'& sam& motion for n&* trial 3roc&&din-. T'& a33&aranc& of im3ro3ri&t% cannot /& &liminat&d m&r&l% /% addr&ssin- t'&s& iss$&s in a 3i&c&m&al fas'ion. 1im3l% stat&d, if a ?$d-& t&stifi&s as a mat&rial *itn&ss *it' r&-ard to an iss$& in a cas&, t'& r&maind&r of t'& cas& m$st /& '&ard /% anot'&r ?$d-&. 61&& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct, Canon " 62) 61) 6/). Accordin-l%, t'& trial co$rt in t'is cas& &rr&d /% d&n%in- L&*isG motions for
1@

r&c$sal and dis;$alification. 6$e,is v. State, 2@< =a. 1D!, < < 1.2.2d !"@ 6=a. 0<:1":2002).) !<. +W4 m$st dis;$alif% 'ims&lf.

JWB HAS VIOLATED WINDSORS RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AND CIVIL RIGHTS. ! . of la*. 7AtBrial /&for& an O$n/ias&d ?$d-&> is &ss&ntial to d$& 3roc&ss.8 Johnson v. Mississippi, !0" 5.1. 212, 21 61D@1)C accord Concrete Pipe ) Prods. 1. Constr. $a'orers Pension +rust, <0E 5.1. 02, 1@ 61DD") 6citation omitt&d). 61&& also $evine v. United States, " 2 5.1. 10, E0 1.Ct. 10"E 61D 0), citin- 2 utt v. United States, "!E 5.1. 11, 1!, @< 1. Ct. 11, 1" 61D<!)C Mathe,s v. 0ldridge, !2! 5.1. "1D, "!! 61D@ )C Peters v. /i , !0@, 5.1. !D", <02 61D@2) !@. Windsor cannot /&&n -iv&n a fair trial. +W4 d&ni&d Windsor a fair +W4 'as violat&d Windsor>s civil and constit$tional ri-'ts $nd&r color

trial in t'& Octo/&r @, 2011 )&arin- and 'is O.(2.. !E. T'& d$& 3roc&ss cla$s&s of /ot' t'& =&or-ia and t'& 5nit&d 1tat&s

Constit$tions -$arant&& a 3art% an im3artial and disint&r&st&d tri/$nal in civil cas&s. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc., !! 5.1. 2"E, 2!2, 100 1.Ct. 1 10, 1 1" 61DE0). Partialit% in favor of t'& -ov&rnm&nt ma% rais& a d&f&ndant>s d$& 3roc&ss conc&rns.8 In re United States o *merica, !!1 #."d at 6citin- In re Murchison, "!D 5.1. 1"" 61D<<). !D. +W4 'as &ff&ctiv&l% d&ni&d Windsor>s ri-'ts of t'& &;$al 3rot&ction

$nd&r t'& la* $nd&r Articl& VI of t'& Constit$tion.


1E

<0.

+W4>s actions 3rov& t'at '& 'as &9&rcis&d 'is 3o*&r in t'is civil

action for 'is o*n 3&rsonal 3$r3os&s rat'&r t'an t'& *ill of t'& la*. FCo$rts ar& t'& m&r& instr$m&nts of t'& la*, and can *ill not'in-. W'&n t'&% ar& said to &9&rcis& a discr&tion, it is a m&r& l&-al discr&tion, a discr&tion to /& &9&rcis&d in disc&rnin- t'& co$rs& 3r&scri/&d /% la*, and, *'&n t'at is disc&rn&d, it is t'& d !" of t'& co$rt to follo* it. +$dicial 3o*&r is n&v&r &9&rcis&d for t'& 3$r3os& of -ivin- &ff&ct to t'& *ill of t'& ?$d-&C al*a%s for t'& 3$r3os& of -ivin- &ff&ct to t'& *ill of t'& l&-islat$r&C or, in ot'&r *ords, to t'& *ill of t'& la*.F G$ittleton v. Ber'ling, ! E #.2d "ED, !12 6@t' Cir. 1D@2), citin- 2s'orn v. Ban" o the United States, D W'&at 622 5.1.) @"E, E , L.2d 20! 61E2!)C U.S. v. Simpson, D2@ #.2d 10EE 6Dt' Cir. 1DD0). <1. T'& Octo/&r @, 2011 Ord&r iss$&d /% +W4 d&3riv&s Windsor of ri-'ts

to *'ic' '& is &ntitl&d $nd&r t'& .$l&s of Civil Proc&d$r&, =&or-ia la*, t'& =&or-ia Constit$tion, and t'& 5nit&d 1tat&s Constit$tion. T'& Octo/&r @, 2011 O.(2. d&3riv&s Windsor of fr&&dom of s3&&c', d$& 3roc&ss, and t'& ri-'t to 3&tition -ov&rnm&nt for a r&dr&ss of -ri&vanc&s. <2. <". +W4 'as violat&d Windsor>s Constit$tional ri-'ts. #or d$& 3roc&ss and to s&c$r& t'& Constit$tional ri-'ts of Windsor,

?$d-&s ma% not ta,& t'& la* into t'&ir o*n 'ands. 4$t t'is is 3r&cis&l% *'at +W4 'as don&. +W4 'as i-nor&d t'& la*, i-nor&d t'& facts, ta,&n a/sol$t&l% &rron&o$s l&-al 3ositions, $s&d ina33lica/l& la*, and a/$s&d and disadvanta-&d Windsor.
<!.

#or d$& 3roc&ss to /& s&c$r&d, t'& la*s m$st o3&rat& ali,& $3on all

and not s$/?&ct t'& individ$al to t'& ar/itrar% &9&rcis& of -ov&rnm&ntal 3o*&r.
1D

6Marchant v. Penns#lvania %.%., 1<" 5.1. "E0, "E 61ED!).) +W4 'as violat&d Windsor>s ri-'ts /% $sin- 'is 3o*&r to inflict 'is /ias. <<. #or d$& 3roc&ss, Windsor 'as t'& ri-'t to 3rot&ctions &93r&ssl%

cr&at&d in stat$t& and cas& la*. +W4 'as violat&d Windsor>s ri-'ts /% $sin- 'is 3o*&r to i-nor& facts and t'& la*. < . ($& 3roc&ss all&-&dl% &ns$r&s t'at t'& -ov&rnm&nt *ill r&s3&ct all of a

3&rsonGs l&-al ri-'ts and -$arant&& f$ndam&ntal fairn&ss and ?$stic&. +W4>s actions 'av& violat&d Windsor>s ri-'ts and d&ni&d ?$stic&. <@. ($& 3roc&ss 'olds t'& -ov&rnm&nt s$/s&rvi&nt to t'& la* of t'& land,

3rot&ctin- individ$al 3&rsons from t'& stat&. +W4 'as violat&d t'is tr$st. <E. ($& 3roc&ss r&;$ir&s an &sta/lis'&d co$rs& for ?$dicial 3roc&&din-s

d&si-n&d to saf&-$ard t'& l&-al ri-'ts of t'& individ$al. Action d&n%in- t'& 3roc&ss t'at is 7d$&8 is $nconstit$tional. In'&r&nt in t'& &93&ctation of d$& 3roc&ss is t'at t'& ?$d-& *ill a/id& /% t'& r$l&s. +W4 'as int&rf&r&d *it' t'& 3roc&ss and violat&d r$l&s for t'& 3$r3os& of dama-in- Windsor. <D. An in'&r&nt Constit$tional ri-'t is t'& 'on&st% of t'& ?$d-&. +W4 'as

not /&&n 'on&st. 6U.S. v. Balistrieri, @@D #.2d 11D1, 1201 6@t' Cir. 1DE<), cert. denied, !@@ 5.1. D0E 61DE ).)

20

0.

T'& Constit$tion -$arant&&s Windsor a fair and im3artial ?$d-&. +W4

d&ni&d Windsor>s -$arant&& to inflict 'is &9traH?$dicial /ias. 2v&r% 3&rson 7'as a constit$tional and stat$tor% ri-'t to an im3artial and fair ?$d-& at all sta-&s of t'& 3roc&&din-.8 6$ite"# v U.S., <10 51 <!0 61DD!). 61&& Stone v Po,ell, !2E 51 ! <, !E" n. "<, D 1. Ct. "0"@, !D L. 2d. 2d 10 @ 61D@ ).) 7AtBrial /&for& an O$n/ias&d ?$d-&> is &ss&ntial to d$& 3roc&ss.8 Johnson v. Mississippi, !0" 5.1. 212, 21 61D@1)C accord Concrete Pipe ) Prods. 1. Constr. $a'orers Pension +rust, <0E 5.1. 02, 1@ 61DD") 6citation omitt&d).) 1. ($& 3roc&ss -$arant&&s /asic fairn&ss and to ma,& 3&o3l& f&&l t'at

t'&% 'av& /&&n tr&at&d fairl%. Windsor 'as not /&&n tr&at&d fairl%. 7?$stic& m$st -iv& t'& a33&aranc& of ?$stic&8 $evine v. United States, " 2 5.1. 10, E0 1.Ct. 10"E 61D 0), citin- 2 utt v. United States, "!E 5.1. 11, 1!, @< 1. Ct. 11, 1" 61D<!). Peters v. /i , !0@, 5.1. !D", <02 61D@2). THIS MOTION IS PROCEDURALLY ADEQUATE, AND JWB MUST ACCEPT THAT THE AFFIDAVIT IS TRUE. 2. T'is 2m&r-&nc% Motion to .&c$s& +W4 is 3roc&d$rall% ad&;$at&.

T'is is a 3ro3&r a33lication for a c'an-& of ?$d-&. T'& 1$3r&m& Co$rt '&ld t'at t'& c'all&n-&d ?$d-& m$st d&t&rmin& onl% t'& s$ffici&nc% of t'& affidavit, not t'& tr$t' of t'& all&-ations. 6@t' Cir. 1DD2) 6o3inion of Posn&r, +., in c'am/&rs)C United States v. Balistrieri, @@D #.2d 11D1, 1202P0" 6@t' Cir. 1DE<). Berger v. United States, 2<< 5.1. 22 61D21). FATB'& trial ?$d-& 'as t'& d$t% to d&t&rmin& *'&t'&r, ass$min- t'& tr$t' of t'& facts all&-&d, a r&asona/l& 3&rson mi-'t concl$d& t'at t'& ?$d-& 'ar/ors /ias, st&mmin- from an &9traH?$dicial so$rc&, *'ic' is of a nat$r& and int&nsit% as *o$ld int&rf&r& *it' t'& &9&rcis& of im3artial ?$d-m&nt.F 6P$nct$ation omitt&d.) Scott v. State, 2"2 =a. A33. ""@, "!0 62) 6<01 122d
21

2<<) 61DDE). 6In re J. 0. +., 0! 1.2.2d 2", 2 D =a.A33. < @ 6=a.A33. 0D:1":200!).) THE OBJECTIVE TEST OF WHETHER IMPARTIALITY MIGHT REASONABLY BE QUESTIONED ". T'& Co$rt m$st t'&n consid&r 7*'&t'&r im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l%

/& ;$&stion&d.8 !. T'& t&st is cl&arl% *'&t'&r t'& im3artialit% of t'& co$rt mi-'t

r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d /% 3&o3l& ot'&r t'an t'& ?$d-& in ;$&stion, or &v&n ot'&r ?$d-&s. <. T'is motion c'all&n-&s actions and comm&nts /% +W4 t'at ar& /ot'

o$t of t'is civil action and in t'is civil action. . T'& 1$3r&m& Co$rt 'as mad& it a/sol$t&l% cl&ar t'at t'& so$rc& of t'&

im3artialit% of t'& co$rt n&&d not n&c&ssaril% st&m from an &9traH?$dicial so$rc&L It is *ron- in t'&or%, t'o$-' it ma% not /& too far off t'& mar, as a 3ractical matt&r, to s$--&st, as man% o3inions 'av&, t'at F&9tra?$dicial so$rc&F is t'& onl% /asis for &sta/lis'in- dis;$alif%in- /ias or 3r&?$dic&. It is t'& onl% common /asis, /$t not t'& &9cl$siv& on&, sinc& it is not t'& &9cl$siv& r&ason a 3r&dis3osition can /& *ron-f$l or ina33ro3riat&. A favora/l& or $nfavora/l& 3r&dis3osition can also d&s&rv& to /& c'aract&riN&d as F/iasF or F3r&?$dic&F /&ca$s&, &v&n t'o$-' it s3rin-s from t'& facts add$c&d or t'& &v&nts occ$rrin- at trial, it is so &9tr&m& as to dis3la% cl&ar ina/ilit% to r&nd&r fair ?$d-m&nt. $ite"#, s$3ra, at <<1. T'& fact t'at an o3inion '&ld /% a ?$d-& d&riv&s from a so$rc& o$tsid& ?$dicial 3roc&&din-s is not a n&c&ssar% condition for F/ias or 3r&?$dic&F
22

r&c$sal, sinc& 3r&dis3ositions d&v&lo3&d d$rin- t'& co$rs& of a trial *ill som&tim&s 6al/&it rar&l%) s$ffic&. $ite"#, at <<!. @. As man% co$rts 'av& not&d, t'& a33&aranc& of im3artialit% /% ?$d-&s

do&s not 'arm onl% t'os& 3arti&s a33&arin- /&for& t'& co$rt in t'at instanc&, /$t $nd&rc$ts t'& 3$/lic 3&rc&3tion of all ?$d-&s. FT'& v&r% 3$r3os& I is to 3romot& confid&nc& in t'& ?$diciar% /% avoidin&v&n t'& a33&aranc& of im3ro3ri&t% *'&n&v&r 3ossi/l&.F $il3e'erg v. Health Servs. *c4uisition Corp., !E 5.1. E!@, E <, 10E 1.Ct. 21D!, 100 L.2d.2d E<< 61DEE). William =. .oss, 05tra3udicial Speech6 Charting the Boundaries o Propriet#, 2 =2O. +. L2=AL 2T)IC1 <ED, <DE 61DED). United States v. Microso t Corp., "! 5.1. A33. (.C. ""0, 2<" #."d "!, 10@ 6(.C. Cir. 2001), at 11!. E. A /ri&f r&vi&* of t'& r&mar,s and actions /% +W4 3rovid&s &vid&nc&

t'at +W4 cannot &v&n m$st&r t'& a33&aranc& of im3artialit%. T'&% 7r&v&al a 'i-' d&-r&& of favoritism or anta-onism8 s$c' t'at r&moval is a33ro3riat&. D. As a matt&r of la*, as t'& 1$3r&m& Co$rt said in $ite"#, s$3ra at <<<,

t'& ;$&stion is *'&t'&r t'& r&mar,s of t'& co$rt 7r&v&al s$c' a 'i-' d&-r&& of favoritism or anta-onism as to ma,& fair ?$d-m&nt im3ossi/l&.8

THIS IS AN EMERGENCY MOTION @0. Windsor as,s t'at t'is Co$rt 'andl& t'is motion on an &m&r-&nc%

/asis /&ca$s& Windsor>s ri-'ts 'av& /&&n s&rio$sl% infrin-&d, and tim& is of t'& &ss&nc&.
2"

@1.

1$33ort for t'is Motion is 3rovid&d in t'& Affidavit of Pr&?$dic& 6t'&

T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor) attac'&d '&r&to as 29'i/it A and incor3orat&d '&r&in, as *&ll as all motions, doc$m&nts, and affidavits fil&d /% Windsor in t'& instant Civil Action and all ord&rs of t'is co$rt. @2. Windsor 'as fil&d a tim&l% and s$ffici&nt affidavit t'at +W4 'as a

3&rsonal /ias and 3r&?$dic& a-ainst Windsor and a 3&rsonal /ias in favor of t'& (&f&ndants and f&llo* ?$d-&s. T'& affidavit stat&s t'& facts and t'& r&asons for t'& /&li&f t'at /ias or 3r&?$dic& &9ists, and t'is motion and affidavit ar& /&in- fil&d fo$r da%s aft&r t'& O.(2. in *'ic' t'& /ias of +W4 *as cl&arl% d&monstrat&d. T'& facts ar& s$c' t'at a r&asona/l& 3&rson *o$ld f&&l t'at /ias &9ists. @". P$rs$ant to 51C. .$l& 2<, +W4 s'all 3roc&&d no f$rt'&r '&r&in, and

anot'&r ?$d-& s'all /& assi-n&d to '&ar t'is 3roc&&din-. W)2.2#O.2, 'avin- no* fil&d t'is Motion and s*orn affidavits, Windsor r&s3&ctf$ll% r&;$&sts as follo*sL 61) t'at t'is Motion /& r&f&rr&d to anot'&r ?$d-& for a '&arin-C 62) t'at t'& Co$rt -rant PLAINTI## WILLIAM M. WIN(1O.>1 2M2.=2NCQ MOTION TO .2C512 +W4C 6") t'at t'& Co$rt iss$& an ord&r r&c$sin- +W4C 6!) t'at t'& Co$rt stri,& all ord&rs /% +W4 and r&;$ir& t'& (&f&ndants to fil& tim&l% ans*&rs to t'& #irst Am&nd&d V&rifi&d Com3laintC
2!

6<) t'at t'& Co$rt cond$ct a '&arin- to r&consid&r t'& .&;$&st for T&m3orar% .&strainin- Ord&r and Pr&liminar% In?$nction, and t'& ot'&r iss$&sC 6 ) t'at t'& Co$rt -rant a conf&r&nc& *it' all 3arti&sC and 6@) t'at t'& Co$rt -rant s$c' ot'&r and f$rt'&r r&li&f as ?$stic& r&;$ir&s in association *it' t'is Motion. 1$/mitt&d t'is 11t' da% of Octo/&r, 2011.

############################### W$%%$&' M. W$(d)*+ P+* S, PO 4o9 E12" Mari&tta, =A "00 E T&l&3'on&L @@0H<@EH10D! #acsimil&L @@0H2"!H!10 2mailL *illiam*indsorR/&llso$t'.n&t

2<

VERIFICATION OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR I, William M. Windsor, s*&ar t'at I am a$t'oriN&d to ma,& t'is v&rification and t'at t'& facts all&-&d in t'& for&-oin- MOTION ar& tr$& and corr&ct /as&d $3on m% 3&rsonal ,no*l&d-&, &9c&3t as to t'& matt&rs '&r&in stat&d to /& all&-&d on information and /&li&f, and t'at as to t'os& matt&rs I /&li&v& t'&m to /& tr$&. In accordanc& *it' 2E 5.1.C. J 1@! , I d&clar& $nd&r 3&nalt% of 3&r?$r% t'at t'& for&-oin- is tr$& and corr&ct /as&d $3on m% 3&rsonal ,no*l&d-&. T'is 11t' da% of Octo/&r, 2011.

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS William M. Windsor 1*orn to /&for& m&, t'is 11t' da% of Octo/&r, 2011. SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS Notar% P$/lic

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I '&r&/% c&rtif% t'at I 'av& s&rv&d t'& for&-oin- /% &l&ctronic mail and /% d&3ositin- a tr$& and corr&ct co3% of t'& sam& in t'& 5nit&d 1tat&s mail, 3ro3&r 3osta-& affi9&d t'&r&to, addr&ss&d as follo*sL Lanna .&n&& )ill .. (avid War& 0a%& Wood*ard 4$rr&ll +&rol%n W&// #&rrari Offic& of t'& #$lton Co$nt% Attorn&% 1!1 Pr%or 1tr&&t, 1$it& !0"E HH Atlanta, =A "0"0" !0!H 12H02! HH #a9L !0!H@"0H "2! Lanna.'illRf$ltonco$nt%-a.-ov T'is 11t' da% of Octo/&r, 2011.

############################### W$%%$&' M. W$(d)*+ P+* S, PO 4o9 E12" Mari&tta, =A "00 E T&l&3'on&L @@0H<@EH10D! #acsimil&L @@0H2"!H!10 2mailL *illiam*indsorR/&llso$t'.n&t

2@

You might also like