Emergency-Motion-To-Recuse Judge
Emergency-Motion-To-Recuse Judge
Emergency-Motion-To-Recuse Judge
" #$lton Co$nt%, Offic& of t'& #$lton Co$nt% ) (istrict Attorn&%, Pa$l )o*ard, +r., C%nt'ia ) N*o,oc'a, Naomi #$d-&, .&/&cca 0&&l, ) Wav&rl% 1&ttl&s, Li&$t&nant 2n-lis', (&3$t% 4&tts, ) (&3$t% .o%&, 1t&v& 4road/&nt, and 5n,no*n ) (o&s, ) (&f&ndants ) ) PLAINTIFF WILLIAM M. WINDSORS EMERGENCY MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE JERRY W. BAXTER Com&s No* Plaintiff William M. Windsor 67Windsor8 or 7Plaintiff8), and as,s t'at +&rr% W. 4a9t&r 67+W48) /& r&mov&d:r&c$s&d:dis;$alifi&d from t'& a/ov& &ntitl&d matt&r 3$rs$ant to .$l& 2< of t'& 5niform 1$3&rior Co$rt .$l&s 6751C.8), Canons 1, 2, and " of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct, all ot'&r r&l&vant stat$tor% and cas& la*, as *&ll as t'& #irst, #ift', 2i-'t', and #o$rt&&nt' Am&ndm&nts to t'& 5nit&d 1tat&s Constit$tion, t'& ($& Proc&ss Cla$s& of t'& #ift' Am&ndm&nt to t'& 5.1. Constit$tion, t'& Constit$tion of t'& 1tat& of =&or-ia, and t'& Co$rt>s in'&r&nt 3o*&rs. 4as&d $3on t'is motion, t'& attac'&d Affidavit of Pr&?$dic& 629'i/it A), and &9'i/its '&r&to, Windsor mov&s for r&c$sal of +W4
1
from all f$rt'&r 3roc&&din-s in t'&s& matt&rs. T'& filin- and 3r&s&ntation of t'is Motion is ta,in- 3lac& not lat&r t'an fiv& 6<) da%s aft&r Windsor first l&arn&d of t'& -ro$nds for dis;$alification at t'& )&arin- on Octo/&r @, 2011. 1. As r&;$ir&d /% 51C. .$l& 2<.2, t'& accom3an%in- affidavits
attac'&d '&r&to cl&arl% stat& t'& facts and r&asons for t'& /&li&f t'at /ias or 3r&?$dic& &9ists, /&in- d&finit& and s3&cific as to tim&, 3lac&, 3&rsons and circ$mstanc&s of &9tra ?$dicial cond$ct or stat&m&nts, *'ic' d&monstrat& &it'&r /ias in favor of adv&rs& 3arti&s and 3r&?$dic& to*ard t'& movin- 3art% in 3artic$lar, and a s%st&matic 3att&rn of 3r&?$dicial cond$ct to*ard 3&rsons similarl% sit$at&d to t'& movin- 3art%, *'ic' *o$ld infl$&nc& t'& ?$d-& and im3&d& or 3r&v&nt im3artialit% in t'at action. 2. T'is Motion m&&ts t'& r&;$ir&m&nts of 51C. .$l& 2<. A61)B T'&
motion is tim&l%C A62)B t'& Affidavit is l&-al s$ffici&ntC and A6")B ass$min- an% of t'& facts all&-&d in t'& affidavit to /& tr$&, r&c$sal is *arrant&d. 61&& Morgan v. Propst, "01 =a.A33. !02 6=a.A33. 11:0 :200D)C Christensen v. State, 2!< =a. A33. 1 <, 1@1 610) 6a) 6<"@ 122d !! ) 62000)C Hunnicutt v. Hunnicutt, 2!E =a. <1 62E" 1.2.2d ED1) 61DE1).) ". +W4 is no* o/li-at&d to 'av& anot'&r ?$d-& '&ar t'is motion.
FTo *arrant dis;$alification of a trial +$d-& t'& affidavit s$33ortin- t'& r&c$sal motion Gm$st -iv& fair s$33ort to t'& c'ar-& of a /&nt of mind t'at
2
ma% 3r&v&nt or im3&d& im3artialit% of ?$d-m&nt.G Berger v. United States, 2<< 5.1. 22, ""H"! 6!1 1. Ct. 2"0, < L. 2d. !E1) 61D21).F Jones v. State, 2!@ =a. 2 E, 2@1 6!) 62@< 1.2.2d @) 61DE1), c&rt. d&n. !<! 5.1. E1@ 6102 1. Ct. D!, @0 L. 2d. 2d E ). W'&n a trial +$d-& in a cas& 3&ndin- in t'at co$rt is 3r&s&nt&d *it' a motion to r&c$s& accom3ani&d /% an affidavit, t'& +$d-&Gs d$t% *ill /& limit&d to 3assin- $3on t'& l&-al s$ffici&nc% of t'& affidavit, and if, ass$min- all t'& facts all&-&d in t'& affidavit to /& tr$&, r&c$sal *o$ld /& *arrant&d, t'&n anot'&r +$d-& m$st /& assi-n&d to '&ar t'& motion to r&c$s&.... it is as m$c' t'& d$t% of a +$d-& not to -rant t'& motion to r&c$s& *'&n t'& motion is l&-all% ins$ffici&nt as it is to r&c$s& *'&n t'& motion is m&ritorio$sC nor do&s t'& sim3l& filin- of an affidavit a$tomaticall% dis;$alif% a +$d-&. ACit.BF State v. Fleming, 2!< =a. @00 61), @02 62 @ 1.2.2d 20@) 61DE0). 1&& also Hardman v. Hardman, 1E< =a. A33. <1D, <20 6") 6" ! 1.2.2d !<) 61DEE). FACTUAL BACKGROUND !. T'& fact$al /ac,-ro$nd in t'is cas& is r&cit&d in t'& Affidavit of
Pr&?$dic& 629'i/it A. 1&& 3ara-ra3's 10 to <D.) JWB IS BIASED AGAINST WINDSOR AND PREJUDICED FOR THE DEFENDANTS AND FELLOW JUDGES. <. Pr&?$dic& and /ias ma% /& &it'&r for or a-ainst. In t'& instant action,
t'&r& is /ot'. +W4 'as anta-onistic /ias to*ard Windsor. +W4 'as a 3r&?$dic& in favor of t'& (&f&ndants and f&llo* ?$d-&s. . Plain and sim3l&, +W4 violat&d Windsor>s ri-'ts, '&ld a /o-$s
'&arin- t'at did not 3rovid& Windsor t'& o33ort$nit% to /& '&ard, i-nor&d t'& tr$t' t'at '& *as o/li-at&d to acc&3t, and iss$&d an ord&r /&ca$s& '& *ant&d to dama-& Windsor to sto3 'im from &93osin- corr$3tion in t'& l&-al s%st&m in #$lton
"
Co$nt%. +W4 did not d&monstrat& an o$nc& of im3artialit% or fairn&ss. )is Octo/&r @, 2011 O.(2. is ill&-al and totall% $nfo$nd&d. +W4>s &9tr&m& /ias is a33ar&nt in 'is Ord&r and *'at too, 3lac& at t'& Octo/&r @, 2011 )&arin67)&arin-8). 61&& 29'i/it 1"! to t'& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor and 3ara-ra3's "EH<E to t'& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit.) @. +W4 'ad a 3r&conc&iv&d id&a of t'is civil action from information
t'at 'as com& from o$tsid& t'& cas&. At t'& )&arin-, +W4 mad& stat&m&nts a/o$t Windsor>s f&d&ral co$rt liti-ation t'at *as not an%*'&r& to /& fo$nd in t'& r&cord /&for& t'& co$rt. T'is *as cl&arl% &9traH?$dicial information t'at f&d 'is /ias. E. T'&r& *as no affidavit and no t&stimon% from an%on& /$t Windsor
/&for& +W4 *'&n '& d&fam&d Windsor in 'is co$rt ord&r and mad& 'is void of im3artialit% 3art of t'& 3$/lic r&cord. +W4 3rov&d 'is &9traH?$dicial /ias a-ainst Windsor /% i-norin- t'& facts and inv&ntin- 'is o*n facts. +WM is o/li-at&d to acc&3t Windsor>s $ncontrov&rt&d stat&m&nts as fact, /$t '& i-nor&d t'is most f$ndam&ntal o/li-ation of a ?$d-&. 7Iall *itn&ss&s ar& 3r&s$m&d /% t'& tri&r of fact to s3&a, t'& tr$t' $nl&ss im3&ac'&d /% som& mann&r 3r&scri/&d /% la*. Cupp v. Naughten, !1! 5. 1. 1!1, 1!"H1!@ 6D! 1C "D , "E L22d " E) 61D@")C Noggle v. State, 2< =a. "E", "E<H"E 6"!D 122d 1@<) 61DE ).8 6Bitt Intl. Co., Inc. v. Fletcher, 2<D =a.A33. !0 , <@@ 1.2.2d 2@ 6=a.A33. 02:0":200").)
D.
AT*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor, JJ@! and E2.B +W4 'as stat&d t'at Windsor>s cond$ct in t'is Co$rt incl$d&s 7vol$mino$s, m&ritl&ss filin-s.8 T'is is fals& and is &asil% 3rov&n fals& /% t'& r&cord. Ot'&r t'an t'& V&rifi&d Com3laint and #irst Am&nd&d V&rifi&d Com3laint, Windsor fil&d onl% fiv& motions totalin- 1 3a-&s. 61&& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor, K@!.) Windsor fil&d ! doc$m&nts totalin- @2 3a-&s in r&s3ons&s to motions and filin-s of t'& (&f&ndants. 61&& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor, K@<.) 10. 11. EE 3a-&s dot' not vol$mino$s ma,&. +W4 did not o/?&ct to an% of t'&s& filin-s in 'is ord&rs. T'&r& *as
not'in- im3ro3&r *it' an% of t'&s& filin-s. 12. Windsor also fil&d s*orn affidavits *it' &vid&nc&. No ?$d-& can 'av&
a valid o/?&ction to &vid&nc&. Windsor fil&d t'& &vid&nc& so t'at all affidavits 3r&s&nt&d to t'& =rand +$r% *o$ld /& 3art of t'& r&cord and so no on& co$ld sto3 Windsor from -&ttin- si-nificant &vid&nc& into t'& r&cord. 1". No 'on&st ?$d-& co$ld sa% t'is *as vol$mino$s. And t'&r& *as
not'in- at all m&ritl&ss in an%t'in- t'at Windsor fil&d. Not'in- *as controv&rt&d, so Windsor>s facts *&r& t'& onl% facts /&for& t'& Co$rt.
<
1!.
+W4>s O.(2. is on& /i- o/str$ction of ?$stic&. )& cit&d on& and
onl% on& cas& for ?$stification for s$a s3ont& dismissal, and t'& cas& do&s not a33l%. In fact, t'&r& 'as n&v&r /&&n a cas& in t'& =&or-ia a33&llat& co$rts t'at *o$ld ?$stif% s$c' a dismissal. 29'i/it 1" to t'& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor is t'& citation to &v&r% =&or-ia a33&llat& cas& r&t$rn&d /% a s&arc' of 7dismiss8 *it'in < *ords of 7s$a s3ont&.8 Non& of t'&s& cas&s 3rovid& t'at t'is O.(2. is 3&rmissi/l& $nd&r =&or-ia la*. 1<. In t'& O.(2., +W4 claims '& can ta,& 7?$dicial notic&8 of 3r&vio$s
la*s$its, /$t t'& r$l&s and t'& cas& la* on ?$dicial notic& 'av& to /& ,no*n /% +W4, and ?$dicial notic& ma% not /& ta,&n. T'& 3r&vio$s la*s$its do not constit$t& ,no*l&d-& of t'& -&n&ral 3$/lic, ar& not r&f&r&nc& mat&rial, and ar& not matt&rs ,no*n to t'& ?$d-&. In addition, Windsor *as not -iv&n notic& or an o33ort$nit% to /& '&ard on *'&t'&r ?$dicial notic& co$ld /& ta,&n. +W4>s O.(2. indicat&s t'at '& *as ?$stif%in- 'is ord&r /as&d $3on information in ot'&r la*s$its, /$t s$c' iss$&s ar& a matt&r of 3roof t'at cannot /& ?$diciall% notic&d, and Windsor mad& it cl&ar in affidavits and at t'& )&arin- t'at all of t'at *as dis3$t&d. In addition, co$rt doc$m&nts 'av& to /& c&rtifi&d, and non& of t'&s& *&r&. T'& rol& of ?$dicial notic& is to &liminat& formal 3roof as toL 61) Fmatt&rs *'ic' t'& -&n&ral 3$/lic 'as common ,no*l&d-&FC 62)Ffacts *'ic' ar& r&adil% asc&rtaina/l& /% r&f&r&nc& to som& r&lia/l& so$rc&, and ar& /&%ond dis3$t&FC and 6") Fmatt&rs *'ic' ar& *it'in t'& s3&cial 3rovinc& of t'&
?$d-&.F =r&&n, =a. La* of 2vid&nc& 6!t' &d.), J !C s&& also In the Interest o S. M., 1 D =a. A33. " !, " 6"12 1.2.2d E2D) 61DE")C Batson!Coo" Co. v. Shiple#, 1"! =a. A33. 210, 212 621! 1.2.2d 1@ ) 61D@<). In t'is cas&, t'& matt&r t'at 3laintiff *ants ?$diciall% notic&d falls o$tsid& O.C.=.A. J 2!H1H!. T'& iss$& is in dis3$t& and is a matt&r of 3roof. T'$s, it *as 3ro3&r for t'& trial co$rt not to ta,& ?$dicial notic& of t'is iss$&. C&rtifi&d co3i&s of s$c' 3l&adin-s *o$ld 'av& to /& t&nd&r&d into &vid&nc& and r&c&iv&d as 3rimar% &vid&nc& for t'& &9'i/it to /& &vid&nc& /&for& t'& co$rt. O.C.=.A. J 2!H<H"1C Bell v. Cone, 20E =a. ! @ 6 @ 1.2.2d <<E) 61D<1)C Commerce Prop. v. $inthicum, 20D =a. A33. E<" 61) 6!"! 1.2.2d @ D) 61DD")C %utland v. Cit# o &u'lin, <0 =a. A33. 2!2 61@@ 1.2. E1D) 61D"!)C cf. Mason v. State, 1D@ =a. A33. <"! 6"DE 1.2.2d E22) 61DD0)C (enins v. Bo#d, 1 =a. A33. E!", E!! 62) 6"0< 1.2.2d "D1) 61DE")C Mood# v. %oads )c. o *ppling Count#, 2D =a. A33. 21 611" 1.2. 10") 61D22). W'&n a co3% of a trial co$rt r&cord is t&nd&r&d into &vid&nc&, t&stimon% as to *'at is contain&d in s$c' r&cord is s$/?&ct to a 'i-'&st and /&st &vid&nc& o/?&ction, as *&ll as a '&arsa% o/?&ction. $ipscom' v. State, 1D! =a. A33. <@ 6"D1 1.2.2d @@") 61DD0). 6Nations'an" v. +uc"er, 2"1 =a.A33. 22, <00 1.2.2d "@E 6=a.A33. 0":2<:1DDE).) 61&& also Bre,ster v. State, E! 1.2.2d "0D, "00 =a.A33. 1!" 6=a.A33. 0D:22:200D).) It also a33&ars t'at t'& trial co$rt im3ro3&rl% too, ?$dicial notic& of t'& s$mmar% ?$d-m&nt ord&r in t'& Till&% action *it'o$t -ivin- t'& )a%-oods notic& and an o33ort$nit% to /& '&ard r&-ardin- *'&t'&r ?$dicial notic& s'o$ld /& ta,&n. 61&& Fit-patric" v. Harrison, "00 =a. A33. @2, @" n.1 6 E 122d "22) 6200D).) 6Ha#good v. Head, No. A10A0@< 6=a.A33. 0@:0D:2010).) 61&& also Jones v. State, 2@2 =a. D00, D01HD0" 62) 6<"@ 122d E0) 62000)C (raves v. State 2 D =a. @@2 at @@< 6!)6a), 6<0! 122d @D) 61DDE)C Ste,art v. State, 2EE =a. A33. @"<, @"@H@"E 6") 6 << 122d "2E) 6200@)C Cantrell v. State, @" 1.2.2d "2, 2D< =a.A33. "! 6=a.A33. 01:2":200D).) 1 . +W4 claim&d in t'& O.(2. t'at '& consid&r&d t'& &ntir& r&cord, as
*&ll as t'& ar-$m&nt and t&stimon% at t'& '&arin- and d&cid&d t'& cas& *as frivolo$s. T'is is 3&r?$r%. +W4 ,no*s t'& cas& isn>t frivolo$s. )& lcommitt&d
@
3&r?$r%. If '& consid&r&d t'& r&cord, '& co$ld onl% consid&r Windsor>s s*orn &vid&nc& as t'& (&f&ndants 'ad no admissi/l& &vid&nc& and no affidavits or t&stimon% of an% t%3&. Windsor>s s*orn t&stimon% &sta/lis'&d t'at &v&r% fact in t'& #irst Am&nd&d V&rifi&d Com3laint m$st /& ta,&n as tr$&. Windsor>s s*orn t&stimon% &93lain&d t'& crim&s and *ron-doin- in t'& f&d&ral co$rts t'at 3r&c&d&d Windsor>s s$/missions to t'& =rand +$r%. Windsor>s s*orn t&stimon% d&tail&d criminal rac,&t&&rin- /% t'& (&f&ndantsC crim&s a-ainst Windsor of o/str$ction of ?$stic&, ?$r% tam3&rin-, a/$s& of 3roc&ss, and mor& /% (&f&ndantsC t'&ft of mailC crim&s /% t'& Offic& of t'& Cl&r, of t'& Co$rtC and mor&. 1@. T'& )&arin- *as a 0an-aroo Co$rt. Windsor *as s$dd&nl% limit&d to
"0 min$t&s aft&r comm$nicatin- to +W4 da%s /&for& t'at '& antici3at&d t'& '&arin- *o$ld last for s&v&ral da%s. 629'i/it 1<@ to t'& T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor is a tr$& and corr&ct co3% of an &mail &9c'an-& /&t*&&n Windsor and +W4>s staff on Octo/&r 2 and ", 2011.) At t'& )&arin-, Windsor *as d&ni&d t'& ri-'t to /& s*orn in to t&stif%. T'& tim& limit mad& it im3ossi/l& for Windsor to 3r&s&nt t'& &vid&nc& '& s3&nt da%s ass&m/lin- and co3%in-. +W4 r&f$s&d to r&;$ir& s$/3o&na&d *itn&ss&s to 'onor t'&ir validl%Hs&rv&d s$/3o&nas. +W4 i-nor&d t'& facts and t'& la* and imm&diat&l% r$l&d a-ainst Windsor and
dismiss&d t'& cas& *it' no *arnin- *'atso&v&r. 53on information and /&li&f, t'& O.(2. *as *ritt&n /&for& t'& )&arin- *as '&ld. 1E. +W4>s O.(2. 'as clos&d t'& co$rt'o$s& doors to Windsor. +W4
*as a*ar& from Windsor>s s*orn affidavits t'at '& co$ld not 3ossi/l% 3ost a M<0,000 /ond, and +W4 ord&r&d s$c' a /ond as a 3r&r&;$isit& to an% f$t$r& civil action. T'is m&ans Windsor can n&v&r fil& anot'&r civil action. 1D. +W4 'as d&monstrat&d to Windsor t'at '& 'as a d&&3Hs&at&d /ias and
anta-onism a-ainst an%on& *'o *o$ld 'av& t'& a$dacit% to s$& ?$d-&s. 53on information and /&li&d, attorn&% +W4 'as a /ias a-ainst all nonHattorn&% 3ro s& 3laintiffs. 20. +W4 'as an $nfavora/l& o3inion a/o$t Windsor t'at is *ron-f$l and
ina33ro3riat&. It is $nd&s&rv&d, and it r&sts $3on ,no*l&d-& t'at +W4 o$-'t not to 3oss&ss. It is &9c&ssiv& in d&-r&&. 21. Windsor 'as not /&&n tr&at&d fairl% /% +W4. +W4 'as not
d&monstrat&d t'& im3artialit% r&;$ir&d of a ?$d-&. T'& O.(2. iss$&d /% +W4 s'o*s t'is. 22. Canon " 62) of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct s'o$ld /& consid&r&d in
d&t&rminin- *'&t'&r an affidavit s$33ortin- a motion to r&c$s& is l&-all% s$ffici&nt and s&ts fort' facts t'at, if tr$&, *arrant r&c$sal. Canon " 62) 6a) 3rovid&s, in
D
3&rtin&nt 3artL F+$d-&s s'all dis;$alif% t'&ms&lv&s in an% 3roc&&din- in *'ic' t'&ir im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d, incl$din- /$t not limit&d to instanc&s *'&r& . . . t'& ?$d-& 'as a 3&rsonal /ias or 3r&?$dic& conc&rnin- . . . a 3art%Gs la*%&r.F 6Morgan v. Propst, "01 =a.A33. !02 6=a.A33. 11:0 :200D).) 2". +W4 &nt&r&d t'is civil action *it' a clos&d mind and com3l&t& and
total /ias a-ainst Windsor. 2!. T'is motion as,s for r&c$sal:r&moval:dis;$alification of +W4 /as&d
on a n$m/&r of -ro$ndsL 61) O/vio$s /ias a-ainst Windsor and, at t'& v&r% l&ast, t'& a33&aranc& of im3artialit%C 62) violation of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ctC 6") violation of Windsor>s ri-'ts to d$& 3roc&ss and Constit$tional and civil ri-'tsC 6!) t'& fact t'at +W4 *ill no* /& a *itn&ss and s'o$ld also /&com& a (&f&ndantC and mor&. JWB HAS DEMONSTRATED BIAS AGAINST WINDSOR AND THE APPEARANCE OF A LACK OF IMPARTIALITY 2<. T'& /ias of +W4 is int&ns&.
T'& all&-&d /ias of t'& ?$d-& m$st /&AB Fof s$c' a nat$r& and int&nsit% to 3r&v&nt t'& d&f&ndant from o/tainin- a trial $ninfl$&nc&d /% t'& co$rtGs 3r&?$d-m&nt. To *arrant dis;$alification of a trial ?$d-& t'& affidavit s$33ortin- t'& r&c$sal motion m$st -iv& fair s$33ort to t'& c'ar-& of a /&nt of mind t'at ma% 3r&v&nt or im3&d& im3artialit% of ?$d-m&nt.F 6(illis v. Cit# o .a#cross, 2!@ =a. A33. 11D, 122 6<!" 122d !2") 62000) =illis, s$3ra at 120 6;$otin- Birt v. State, 2< =a. !E", !E 6!) 6"<0 122d 2!1) 61DE )).)
10
2 .
m$st &nt&rtain si-nificant do$/t of t'& im3artialit% of +W4. 7A ?$d-& s'all dis;$alif% 'ims&lf or '&rs&lf in a 3roc&&din- in *'ic' t'& ?$d-&>s im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d.8 6$ite"# v. U.S., 11! 1.Ct. 11!@, 11 2 61DD!)C Par"er v. Connors Steel Co., E<< #.2d 1<10 611t' Cir.) 61DEE) citin- Potashnic" v. Port Cit# Const. Co., 0D #.2d 1101, 1111 6<t' Cir.), c&rt. d&ni&d, !!D 5.1. E20, 101 1.Ct. @E, L.2d. 2d 22 61DE0).)1 FW'&n a trial ?$d-& in a cas& 3&ndin- in t'at co$rt is 3r&s&nt&d *it' a motion to r&c$s& accom3ani&d /% an affidavit, t'& ?$d-&Gs d$t% *ill /& limit&d to 3assin- $3on t'& l&-al s$ffici&nc% of t'& affidavit, and if, ass$min- all t'& facts all&-&d in t'& affidavit to /& tr$&, r&c$sal *o$ld /& *arrant&d, t'&n anot'&r ?$d-& m$st /& assi-n&d to '&ar t'& motion to r&c$s&.F 6Citation and 3$nct$ation omitt&d.) State v. &avis, 159 Ga. App. 537, <"D 6") 6284 SE2d 51) 61DE1). Canon " C. 61) 6a) of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct stat&sL F+$d-&s s'o$ld dis;$alif% t'&ms&lv&s in 3roc&&din-s in *'ic' t'&ir im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d, incl$din- /$t not limit&d to instanc& *'&r&L . . . t'& ?$d-& 'as a 3&rsonal /ias or 3r&?$dic& conc&rnin- a 3art% or a 3art%Gs la*%&r . . . .F FW& int&r3r&t t'& *ord Gs'o$ldG to m&an Gs'allG in t'& cont&9t of t'is r&;$ir&m&nt.F Savage v. Savage, 234 Ga. 853, E< 6218 SE2d 568) 61D@<). Houston v. Cavanagh et al., 6199 Ga. App. 387), 6405 SE2d 105), 61DD1). 2@. If *& a33l% t'& r&asona/l& 3&rson anal%sis to t'is sit$ation, an%
anta-onism t'at *o$ld r&nd&r fair ?$d-m&nt im3ossi/l&. $ite"# v. United States, <10 5.1. <!0, << , 11! 1. Ct. 11!@, 11<E, 12@ L. 2d. 2d !@! 61DD!).
1
T'& =&or-ia 1$3r&m& Co$rt 'ad ado3t&d t'& f&d&ral r$l& on motions to r&c$s& in State v. Fleming, 2!< =a. @00, @02 61) 62 @ 1.2.2d 20@) 61DE0).
11
2D.
T'& av&ra-& r&asona/l& 3&rson, ,no*in- all t'& facts, *o$ld &asil%
concl$d& t'at +W4>s im3artialit% co$ld /& ;$&stion&d, t'at +W4 cannot 3ossi/l% -iv& Windsor a fair and im3artial '&arin-, and t'at '& s'o$ld /& r&mov&d and r&3lac&d /% an im3artial ?$d-&. 67T'& 3ro/a/ilit% of act$al /ias on t'& 3art of t'& ?$d-& . . . is too 'i-' to /& constit$tionall% tol&ra/l&8)C Berger v. United States, 2<< 5.1. 22, ""H"! 61D21)C Potashnic" v. Port Cit# Constr. Co., 0D #.2d 1101, 1111 6<t' Cir. 1DE0) 67An% ;$&stion of a ?$d-&>s im3artialit% t'r&at&ns t'& 3$rit% of t'& ?$dicial 3roc&ss and its instit$tions8)C /ing v. State, 2! =a. "E , "EDHD0, 2@1 1.2.2d "0 61DE0)C Hall v. Small Bus. *dmin., D< #.2d 1@<, 1@D 6<t' Cir. 1DE")C United States v. Colum'ia Broad. S#s., Inc., !D@ #.2d 10@, 10D 6<t' Cir. 1D@!)C Stephens v. Stephens, 2!D =a. @00, @02, 2D2 1.2.2d ED, D1 61DE2)C Isaacs v. State, 2<@ =a. 12 , 12@, "<< 1.2.2d !! 61DE@). Im3artialit% of t'& +$d-& is t'& /&droc, of fairn&ss in o$r ?$dicial s%st&m. W'&r& it mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d, t'& +$d-& s'o$ld dis;$alif% or /& r&c$s&d. Houston v. Cavanagh, 1DD =a. A33. "E@, "EE 6!0< 1.2.2d 10<) 61DD1). 2v&n t'& a33&aranc& of t'& lac, of im3artialit%, if /as&d on a r&asona/l& /&li&f s$33ort&d /% fact, mandat&s t'at anot'&r +$d-& tr% t'& cas&. 51C. 2< im3l&m&nts t'& 'i-' standard of Canon " of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct and m$st /& scr$3$lo$sl% ad'&r&d to. 6BU+$0% v. BI10N S2F+.*%0, !@" 1.2.2d 1 E, 222 =a. A33. EE 60 :0@:D ).) T'& n&c&ssit% for r&c$sal is not limit&d to circ$mstanc&s *'&r& act$al /ias 'as /&&n d&monstrat&d. Inst&ad, r&c$sal is also r&;$ir&d, $nd&r ?$dicial &t'ics standards, *'&n&v&r a trial ?$d-&Gs Fim3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d.F 6Birt v. State, 2< =a. !E" 6!) 6"<0 122d 2!1) 61DE ).) "0. T'& Affidavit of Pr&?$dic& stat&s v&r% cl&arl% t'& facts and r&asons for
t'& /&li&f t'at /ias and 3r&?$dic& &9ists. (at&s, tim&s, 3lac&s, circ$mstanc&s, and stat&m&nts ar& it&miN&d. T'is is P2.1ONAL /ias /% +W4, not ?$dicial /ias. )&
12
'as a /ias a-ainst Windsor t'at is not ca$s&d /% an%t'in- t'at 'a33&n&d /&t*&&n t'& tim& t'& Civil Action *as fil&d on 1&3t&m/&r 2@, 2011 and t'& )&arin- on Octo/&r @, 2011. Windsor 'ad n&v&r '&ard of +W4 /&for& 1&3t&m/&r 2@, and t'&% n&v&r s3o,& /&for& t'& Octo/&r @ )&arin-. "1. +W4 &sta/lis'&d a cl&arl% fi9&d vi&* a/o$t s$/stantiv& 3&ndin- trial
matt&rs, so t'is m$st rais& conc&rns a/o$t t'& 7a33&aranc& of im3ro3ri&t%,8 a standard t'at m$st /& saf&-$ard&d $nd&r a33lica/l& r&c$sal la*. 53on information and /&li&d, +W4 'ad &9H3art& conv&rsations *it' 3&o3l& a/o$t Windsor. "2. +W4 'as &sta/lis'&d a 3osition in t'is 3roc&&din- t'at Windsor m$st
not /& allo*&d to accom3lis' an%t'in- as +W4 m$st s'i&ld t'& &vilHdo&rs. FT'& n&$tralit% r&;$ir&m&nt '&l3s to -$arant&& t'at lif&, li/&rt%, or 3ro3&rt% *ill not /& ta,&n on t'& /asis of an &rron&o$s or distort&d conc&3tion of t'& facts or t'& la*.F T'is is a33lica/l& to +W4 /% a33lication of Articl& VI of t'& 5nit&d 1tat&s Constit$tion and Stone v Po,ell, !2E 51 ! <, !E" n. "<, D 1. Ct. "0"@, !D L. 2d. 2d 10 @ 61D@ ). "". +W4 $s&d a ton& of Fdisdain and cont&m3tF at t'& )&arin-. )&
&93r&ss&d in 'is /&'avior t'at '& /asicall% *as not list&nin- to t'& ar-$m&nt and t'at Windsor co$ld 'av& sto33&d ar-$in- /&for& '& /&-an. W'&n +W4 concl$d&d t'& '&arin- /% t&llin- Windsor to 7-&t a lif&,8 '& 3rov&d t'at 'is /ias a-ainst Windsor *as &9tr&m&, &9traH?$dicial, and *as foc$s&d on *'at Windsor 'as /&&n att&m3tin- to do 3rior to t'is Civil Action. +W4 mad& it cr%stal cl&ar t'at '&
1"
disa33rov&d of Windsor 'ims&lf. +W4>s foc$s on &9traH?$dicial matt&rs s'o*&d no foc$s *'atso&v&r on t'& r&l&vant iss$&s /&for& t'& Co$rt. JWB HAS VIOLATED THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT. "!. Canon 2 of t'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct 67C+C8) 3rovid&sL 7A ?$d-&
s'o$ld r&s3&ct and com3l% *it' t'& la* and s'o$ld act at all tim&s in a mann&r t'at 3romot&s 3$/lic confid&nc& in t'& int&-rit% and im3artialit% of t'& ?$diciar%.8 2v&r% 3&rson 7'as a constit$tional and stat$tor% ri-'t to an im3artial and fair ?$d-& at all sta-&s of t'& 3roc&&din-.8 $ite"# v U.S., <10 51 <!0 61DD!). "<. +W4 is an &m/arrassm&nt. )& 'as i-nor&d &v&r%t'in- t'at '& is
s*orn to 3rot&ct. )& 'as d&monstrat&d a com3l&t&, total void of im3artialit%. " . FCanon 2 of t'& Cod& of Cond$ct for 5nit&d 1tat&s +$d-&s t&lls ?$d-&s
to Gavoid im3ro3ri&t% and t'& a33&aranc& of im3ro3ri&t% in all activiti&s,G on t'& /&nc' and off.F United States v. Microso t Corp., "! 5.1. A33. (.C. ""0, 2<" #."d "!, 10@ 6(.C. Cir. 2001). "@. +W4 'as i-nor&d &v&r%t'in- t'at '& is s*orn to 3rot&ct. )& 'as
d&monstrat&d a com3l&t&, total void of im3artialit%. "E. Canon "2 r&;$ir&s t'at F+$d-&s s'all dis;$alif% t'&ms&lv&s in an%
3roc&&din- in *'ic' t'&ir im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d. . . .F +W4 fail&d to dis;$alif% 'ims&lf as '& *as r&;$ir&d to do.
1!
"D.
/& &liminat&d /&ca$s& '& 'as /&&n fi-'tin- for ?$stic& a-ainst f&d&ral ?$d-&s. Windsor>s Affidavit of Pr&?$dic& 3rovid&s s$33ort for +W4>s 3r&?$dicial /&nt of mind. A33lica/l& '&r& is Canon "2 *'ic' stat&sL F+$d-&s s'all dis;$alif% t'&ms&lv&s in an% 3roc&&din- in *'ic' t'&ir im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d. . . .F T'& all&-&d /ias of t'& ?$d-& m$st /&L of s$c' a nat$r& and int&nsit% to 3r&v&nt t'& d&f&ndant from o/tainin- a trial $ninfl$&nc&d /% t'& co$rtGs 3r&?$d-m&nt. To *arrant dis;$alification of a trial ?$d-& t'& affidavit s$33ortin- t'& r&c$sal motion m$st -iv& fair s$33ort to t'& c'ar-& of a /&nt of mind t'at ma% 3r&v&nt or im3&d& im3artialit% of ?$d-m&nt. 6Citations and 3$nct$ation omitt&d.) Birt v. State, 2< =a. !E", !E 6!) 6"<0 122d 2!1) 61DE ). 6(illis v. Cit# o .a#cross, 2!@ =a.A33. 11D, <!" 1.2.2d !2" 6=a.A33. 12:01:2000).) !0. +W4>s /ias is &9traH?$dicial. T'& O.(2. 3rov&s t'at +W4 'as /&&n
fi9at&d on information from t'& f&d&ral co$rts t'at is not r&l&vant to t'& iss$&s /&for& t'& Co$rt in t'is matt&r. FATB'& all&-&d /ias m$st st&m from an &9traH?$dicial so$rc& and r&s$lt in an o3inion on t'& m&rits on som& /asis ot'&r t'an *'at t'& ?$d-& l&arn&d from 'is 3artici3ation in t'& cas&.F Birt v. State, 2< =a. !E" at !E< 6!). T'& movant n&&d not s'o* an% act$al im3ro3ri&t% on t'& 3art of t'& trial co$rt ?$d-&. FT'& fact t'at 'is im3artialit% Gmi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&dG s$ffic&s for 'is dis;$alification.F /ing v. State, 2! =a. "E , "D0 6@) 62@1 122d "0) 61DE0). 6(illis v. Cit# o .a#cross, 2!@ =a.A33. 11D, <!" 1.2.2d !2" 6=a.A33. 12:01:2000).) 61&& also Henderson v. Mc1a#, 2 D =a. @, D 62) 6!D! 122d <") 61DDE).) !1. +W4 d&cid&d 'o* '& *o$ld r$l& from information ot'&r t'an *'at '&
l&arn&d in t'is cas&. T'& /ias is so int&ns& t'at Windsor n&v&r 'ad a c'anc& d$& to
1<
t'& 3&rsonal 3r&?$d-m&nt of Windsor t'& 3&rson. +W4 d&cid&d Windsor *as a l&-al t'r&at to 'is ?$dicial and l&-al fri&nds and associat&s, so '& d&vis&d a sc'&m& to sto3 Windsor. Onc& +W4 d&cid&d '& 'ad to sto3 Windsor, t'& facts, t'& la*, and t'& cas& did not matt&r. FIn ord&r to /& dis;$alif%in- t'& all&-&d /ias m$st st&m from an &9traH ?$dicial so$rc& and r&s$lt in an o3inion on t'& m&rits on som& /asis ot'&r t'an *'at t'& ?$d-& l&arn&d from 'is 3artici3ation in t'& cas&. T'& all&-&d /ias of t'& ?$d-& m$st /& of s$c' a nat$r& and int&nsit% to 3r&v&nt t'& 3art% from o/tainin- a trial $ninfl$&nc&d /% t'& co$rtGs 3r&?$d-m&nt.F 6Citations and 3$nct$ation omitt&d.) McBride v. State, 21" =a. A33. E<@, E<D 6!) 6!! 1.2.2d 1D") 61DD!)C Stevens v. M#ers, 1D0 =a. A33. 1 6"@E 1.2.2d ""!) 61DED)C Uni orm Superior Court %ule 2<.2. 6(i'son v. &ecatur Federal, 2"< =a.A33. 1 0, <0E 1.2.2d @EE 6=a.A33. 11:0 :1DDE).) 61&& also Henderson v. Mc1a#, 2 D =a. @, D 62) 6!D! 122d <") 61DDE).) !2. T'& fact t'at 'is im3artialit% 7mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d8
r&;$ir&s dis;$alification. 7Iit is not n&c&ssar% t'at t'&r& /& s'o*n an% act$al im3ro3ri&t% on t'& 3art of t'& trial co$rt +$d-&. T'& fact t'at 'is im3artialit% Omi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d> s$ffic&s for 'is dis;$alification.8 6/ing v. State, 2! =a. "E , "D0 6@) 62@1 1.2.2d "0) 61DE0).F Birt v. State, 2< =a. !E", !E , s$3ra. 1&& also Isaacs v. State, 2<@ =a. 12 6"<< 1.2.2d !!) 61DE@).) 61&& also Jones Count# v. * Mining (roup, $$C, 2E< =a. ! <, ! 6 @E 122d !@!) 6200D).) !". T'& mann&r in *'ic' +W4 'andl&d t'& Octo/&r @, 2011 )&arin-,
stat&m&nts '& mad& as to facts, and 'is r$lin- *arrant r&c$sal. )is cond$ct, stat&m&nts, and r$lin- cam& from &9traH?$dicial so$rc&s. JWB HAS NOW BECOME A WITNESS IN THIS CIVIL ACTION,
1
AND CANON 3 OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT REQUIRES RECUSAL. !!. +W4 'as 'ad &9traH?$dicial comm$nications *it' a 3&rson or 3&rsons
*'o Windsor /&li&v&s ar& 3art of t'& criminal rac,&t&&rin- &nt&r3ris& t'at is on& of t'& iss$&s in t'is Civil Action. Windsor n&&ds to call +W4 as a *itn&ss to d&t&rmin& *'o said *'at, *'&n, *'&r&, and *'%. T'& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct, Canon " 62) s3&cifi&sL 61) +$d-&s s'all dis;$alif% t'&ms&lv&s in an% 3roc&&din- in *'ic' t'&ir im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d, incl$din- /$t not limit&d to instanc&s *'&r&L 6/) . . . t'& ?$d-& 'as /&&n a mat&rial *itn&ss conc&rnin- At'& matt&r in controv&rs%C orB 6c) t'& ?$d-&L 6iv) is, to t'& ?$d-&Gs ,no*l&d-&, li,&l% to /& a mat&rial *itn&ss in t'& 3roc&&din-. FAIBt is &l&m&ntar% t'at on& ma% not /& a *itn&ss and a ?$d-& in t'& sam& 3roc&&din-.F 6%ussell v. State, 2" =a. A33. !< 6") 6<12 122d D1") 61DDD).) 1&& also Shoc"le# ) Co. v. Morgan, 10" =a. 1< 6") 62D 12 D!) 61ED@)C Collins v. State, 1!1 =a. A33. 121 62) 62"2 122d "<) 61D@@).) Alt'o$-' t'& ?$d-& in t'is cas& tri&d to 3artition t'& iss$&s on *'ic' s'& *as dis;$alifi&d from t'& iss$&s on *'ic' s'& did not t&stif%, all t'&s& iss$&s aros& in t'& sam& motion for n&* trial 3roc&&din-. T'& a33&aranc& of im3ro3ri&t% cannot /& &liminat&d m&r&l% /% addr&ssin- t'&s& iss$&s in a 3i&c&m&al fas'ion. 1im3l% stat&d, if a ?$d-& t&stifi&s as a mat&rial *itn&ss *it' r&-ard to an iss$& in a cas&, t'& r&maind&r of t'& cas& m$st /& '&ard /% anot'&r ?$d-&. 61&& Cod& of +$dicial Cond$ct, Canon " 62) 61) 6/). Accordin-l%, t'& trial co$rt in t'is cas& &rr&d /% d&n%in- L&*isG motions for
1@
r&c$sal and dis;$alification. 6$e,is v. State, 2@< =a. 1D!, < < 1.2.2d !"@ 6=a. 0<:1":2002).) !<. +W4 m$st dis;$alif% 'ims&lf.
JWB HAS VIOLATED WINDSORS RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AND CIVIL RIGHTS. ! . of la*. 7AtBrial /&for& an O$n/ias&d ?$d-&> is &ss&ntial to d$& 3roc&ss.8 Johnson v. Mississippi, !0" 5.1. 212, 21 61D@1)C accord Concrete Pipe ) Prods. 1. Constr. $a'orers Pension +rust, <0E 5.1. 02, 1@ 61DD") 6citation omitt&d). 61&& also $evine v. United States, " 2 5.1. 10, E0 1.Ct. 10"E 61D 0), citin- 2 utt v. United States, "!E 5.1. 11, 1!, @< 1. Ct. 11, 1" 61D<!)C Mathe,s v. 0ldridge, !2! 5.1. "1D, "!! 61D@ )C Peters v. /i , !0@, 5.1. !D", <02 61D@2) !@. Windsor cannot /&&n -iv&n a fair trial. +W4 d&ni&d Windsor a fair +W4 'as violat&d Windsor>s civil and constit$tional ri-'ts $nd&r color
trial in t'& Octo/&r @, 2011 )&arin- and 'is O.(2.. !E. T'& d$& 3roc&ss cla$s&s of /ot' t'& =&or-ia and t'& 5nit&d 1tat&s
Constit$tions -$arant&& a 3art% an im3artial and disint&r&st&d tri/$nal in civil cas&s. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc., !! 5.1. 2"E, 2!2, 100 1.Ct. 1 10, 1 1" 61DE0). Partialit% in favor of t'& -ov&rnm&nt ma% rais& a d&f&ndant>s d$& 3roc&ss conc&rns.8 In re United States o *merica, !!1 #."d at 6citin- In re Murchison, "!D 5.1. 1"" 61D<<). !D. +W4 'as &ff&ctiv&l% d&ni&d Windsor>s ri-'ts of t'& &;$al 3rot&ction
<0.
+W4>s actions 3rov& t'at '& 'as &9&rcis&d 'is 3o*&r in t'is civil
action for 'is o*n 3&rsonal 3$r3os&s rat'&r t'an t'& *ill of t'& la*. FCo$rts ar& t'& m&r& instr$m&nts of t'& la*, and can *ill not'in-. W'&n t'&% ar& said to &9&rcis& a discr&tion, it is a m&r& l&-al discr&tion, a discr&tion to /& &9&rcis&d in disc&rnin- t'& co$rs& 3r&scri/&d /% la*, and, *'&n t'at is disc&rn&d, it is t'& d !" of t'& co$rt to follo* it. +$dicial 3o*&r is n&v&r &9&rcis&d for t'& 3$r3os& of -ivin- &ff&ct to t'& *ill of t'& ?$d-&C al*a%s for t'& 3$r3os& of -ivin- &ff&ct to t'& *ill of t'& l&-islat$r&C or, in ot'&r *ords, to t'& *ill of t'& la*.F G$ittleton v. Ber'ling, ! E #.2d "ED, !12 6@t' Cir. 1D@2), citin- 2s'orn v. Ban" o the United States, D W'&at 622 5.1.) @"E, E , L.2d 20! 61E2!)C U.S. v. Simpson, D2@ #.2d 10EE 6Dt' Cir. 1DD0). <1. T'& Octo/&r @, 2011 Ord&r iss$&d /% +W4 d&3riv&s Windsor of ri-'ts
to *'ic' '& is &ntitl&d $nd&r t'& .$l&s of Civil Proc&d$r&, =&or-ia la*, t'& =&or-ia Constit$tion, and t'& 5nit&d 1tat&s Constit$tion. T'& Octo/&r @, 2011 O.(2. d&3riv&s Windsor of fr&&dom of s3&&c', d$& 3roc&ss, and t'& ri-'t to 3&tition -ov&rnm&nt for a r&dr&ss of -ri&vanc&s. <2. <". +W4 'as violat&d Windsor>s Constit$tional ri-'ts. #or d$& 3roc&ss and to s&c$r& t'& Constit$tional ri-'ts of Windsor,
?$d-&s ma% not ta,& t'& la* into t'&ir o*n 'ands. 4$t t'is is 3r&cis&l% *'at +W4 'as don&. +W4 'as i-nor&d t'& la*, i-nor&d t'& facts, ta,&n a/sol$t&l% &rron&o$s l&-al 3ositions, $s&d ina33lica/l& la*, and a/$s&d and disadvanta-&d Windsor.
<!.
#or d$& 3roc&ss to /& s&c$r&d, t'& la*s m$st o3&rat& ali,& $3on all
and not s$/?&ct t'& individ$al to t'& ar/itrar% &9&rcis& of -ov&rnm&ntal 3o*&r.
1D
6Marchant v. Penns#lvania %.%., 1<" 5.1. "E0, "E 61ED!).) +W4 'as violat&d Windsor>s ri-'ts /% $sin- 'is 3o*&r to inflict 'is /ias. <<. #or d$& 3roc&ss, Windsor 'as t'& ri-'t to 3rot&ctions &93r&ssl%
cr&at&d in stat$t& and cas& la*. +W4 'as violat&d Windsor>s ri-'ts /% $sin- 'is 3o*&r to i-nor& facts and t'& la*. < . ($& 3roc&ss all&-&dl% &ns$r&s t'at t'& -ov&rnm&nt *ill r&s3&ct all of a
3&rsonGs l&-al ri-'ts and -$arant&& f$ndam&ntal fairn&ss and ?$stic&. +W4>s actions 'av& violat&d Windsor>s ri-'ts and d&ni&d ?$stic&. <@. ($& 3roc&ss 'olds t'& -ov&rnm&nt s$/s&rvi&nt to t'& la* of t'& land,
3rot&ctin- individ$al 3&rsons from t'& stat&. +W4 'as violat&d t'is tr$st. <E. ($& 3roc&ss r&;$ir&s an &sta/lis'&d co$rs& for ?$dicial 3roc&&din-s
d&si-n&d to saf&-$ard t'& l&-al ri-'ts of t'& individ$al. Action d&n%in- t'& 3roc&ss t'at is 7d$&8 is $nconstit$tional. In'&r&nt in t'& &93&ctation of d$& 3roc&ss is t'at t'& ?$d-& *ill a/id& /% t'& r$l&s. +W4 'as int&rf&r&d *it' t'& 3roc&ss and violat&d r$l&s for t'& 3$r3os& of dama-in- Windsor. <D. An in'&r&nt Constit$tional ri-'t is t'& 'on&st% of t'& ?$d-&. +W4 'as
not /&&n 'on&st. 6U.S. v. Balistrieri, @@D #.2d 11D1, 1201 6@t' Cir. 1DE<), cert. denied, !@@ 5.1. D0E 61DE ).)
20
0.
d&ni&d Windsor>s -$arant&& to inflict 'is &9traH?$dicial /ias. 2v&r% 3&rson 7'as a constit$tional and stat$tor% ri-'t to an im3artial and fair ?$d-& at all sta-&s of t'& 3roc&&din-.8 6$ite"# v U.S., <10 51 <!0 61DD!). 61&& Stone v Po,ell, !2E 51 ! <, !E" n. "<, D 1. Ct. "0"@, !D L. 2d. 2d 10 @ 61D@ ).) 7AtBrial /&for& an O$n/ias&d ?$d-&> is &ss&ntial to d$& 3roc&ss.8 Johnson v. Mississippi, !0" 5.1. 212, 21 61D@1)C accord Concrete Pipe ) Prods. 1. Constr. $a'orers Pension +rust, <0E 5.1. 02, 1@ 61DD") 6citation omitt&d).) 1. ($& 3roc&ss -$arant&&s /asic fairn&ss and to ma,& 3&o3l& f&&l t'at
t'&% 'av& /&&n tr&at&d fairl%. Windsor 'as not /&&n tr&at&d fairl%. 7?$stic& m$st -iv& t'& a33&aranc& of ?$stic&8 $evine v. United States, " 2 5.1. 10, E0 1.Ct. 10"E 61D 0), citin- 2 utt v. United States, "!E 5.1. 11, 1!, @< 1. Ct. 11, 1" 61D<!). Peters v. /i , !0@, 5.1. !D", <02 61D@2). THIS MOTION IS PROCEDURALLY ADEQUATE, AND JWB MUST ACCEPT THAT THE AFFIDAVIT IS TRUE. 2. T'is 2m&r-&nc% Motion to .&c$s& +W4 is 3roc&d$rall% ad&;$at&.
T'is is a 3ro3&r a33lication for a c'an-& of ?$d-&. T'& 1$3r&m& Co$rt '&ld t'at t'& c'all&n-&d ?$d-& m$st d&t&rmin& onl% t'& s$ffici&nc% of t'& affidavit, not t'& tr$t' of t'& all&-ations. 6@t' Cir. 1DD2) 6o3inion of Posn&r, +., in c'am/&rs)C United States v. Balistrieri, @@D #.2d 11D1, 1202P0" 6@t' Cir. 1DE<). Berger v. United States, 2<< 5.1. 22 61D21). FATB'& trial ?$d-& 'as t'& d$t% to d&t&rmin& *'&t'&r, ass$min- t'& tr$t' of t'& facts all&-&d, a r&asona/l& 3&rson mi-'t concl$d& t'at t'& ?$d-& 'ar/ors /ias, st&mmin- from an &9traH?$dicial so$rc&, *'ic' is of a nat$r& and int&nsit% as *o$ld int&rf&r& *it' t'& &9&rcis& of im3artial ?$d-m&nt.F 6P$nct$ation omitt&d.) Scott v. State, 2"2 =a. A33. ""@, "!0 62) 6<01 122d
21
2<<) 61DDE). 6In re J. 0. +., 0! 1.2.2d 2", 2 D =a.A33. < @ 6=a.A33. 0D:1":200!).) THE OBJECTIVE TEST OF WHETHER IMPARTIALITY MIGHT REASONABLY BE QUESTIONED ". T'& Co$rt m$st t'&n consid&r 7*'&t'&r im3artialit% mi-'t r&asona/l%
/& ;$&stion&d.8 !. T'& t&st is cl&arl% *'&t'&r t'& im3artialit% of t'& co$rt mi-'t
r&asona/l% /& ;$&stion&d /% 3&o3l& ot'&r t'an t'& ?$d-& in ;$&stion, or &v&n ot'&r ?$d-&s. <. T'is motion c'all&n-&s actions and comm&nts /% +W4 t'at ar& /ot'
o$t of t'is civil action and in t'is civil action. . T'& 1$3r&m& Co$rt 'as mad& it a/sol$t&l% cl&ar t'at t'& so$rc& of t'&
im3artialit% of t'& co$rt n&&d not n&c&ssaril% st&m from an &9traH?$dicial so$rc&L It is *ron- in t'&or%, t'o$-' it ma% not /& too far off t'& mar, as a 3ractical matt&r, to s$--&st, as man% o3inions 'av&, t'at F&9tra?$dicial so$rc&F is t'& onl% /asis for &sta/lis'in- dis;$alif%in- /ias or 3r&?$dic&. It is t'& onl% common /asis, /$t not t'& &9cl$siv& on&, sinc& it is not t'& &9cl$siv& r&ason a 3r&dis3osition can /& *ron-f$l or ina33ro3riat&. A favora/l& or $nfavora/l& 3r&dis3osition can also d&s&rv& to /& c'aract&riN&d as F/iasF or F3r&?$dic&F /&ca$s&, &v&n t'o$-' it s3rin-s from t'& facts add$c&d or t'& &v&nts occ$rrin- at trial, it is so &9tr&m& as to dis3la% cl&ar ina/ilit% to r&nd&r fair ?$d-m&nt. $ite"#, s$3ra, at <<1. T'& fact t'at an o3inion '&ld /% a ?$d-& d&riv&s from a so$rc& o$tsid& ?$dicial 3roc&&din-s is not a n&c&ssar% condition for F/ias or 3r&?$dic&F
22
r&c$sal, sinc& 3r&dis3ositions d&v&lo3&d d$rin- t'& co$rs& of a trial *ill som&tim&s 6al/&it rar&l%) s$ffic&. $ite"#, at <<!. @. As man% co$rts 'av& not&d, t'& a33&aranc& of im3artialit% /% ?$d-&s
do&s not 'arm onl% t'os& 3arti&s a33&arin- /&for& t'& co$rt in t'at instanc&, /$t $nd&rc$ts t'& 3$/lic 3&rc&3tion of all ?$d-&s. FT'& v&r% 3$r3os& I is to 3romot& confid&nc& in t'& ?$diciar% /% avoidin&v&n t'& a33&aranc& of im3ro3ri&t% *'&n&v&r 3ossi/l&.F $il3e'erg v. Health Servs. *c4uisition Corp., !E 5.1. E!@, E <, 10E 1.Ct. 21D!, 100 L.2d.2d E<< 61DEE). William =. .oss, 05tra3udicial Speech6 Charting the Boundaries o Propriet#, 2 =2O. +. L2=AL 2T)IC1 <ED, <DE 61DED). United States v. Microso t Corp., "! 5.1. A33. (.C. ""0, 2<" #."d "!, 10@ 6(.C. Cir. 2001), at 11!. E. A /ri&f r&vi&* of t'& r&mar,s and actions /% +W4 3rovid&s &vid&nc&
t'at +W4 cannot &v&n m$st&r t'& a33&aranc& of im3artialit%. T'&% 7r&v&al a 'i-' d&-r&& of favoritism or anta-onism8 s$c' t'at r&moval is a33ro3riat&. D. As a matt&r of la*, as t'& 1$3r&m& Co$rt said in $ite"#, s$3ra at <<<,
t'& ;$&stion is *'&t'&r t'& r&mar,s of t'& co$rt 7r&v&al s$c' a 'i-' d&-r&& of favoritism or anta-onism as to ma,& fair ?$d-m&nt im3ossi/l&.8
THIS IS AN EMERGENCY MOTION @0. Windsor as,s t'at t'is Co$rt 'andl& t'is motion on an &m&r-&nc%
/asis /&ca$s& Windsor>s ri-'ts 'av& /&&n s&rio$sl% infrin-&d, and tim& is of t'& &ss&nc&.
2"
@1.
T*&nt%HT'ird Affidavit of William M. Windsor) attac'&d '&r&to as 29'i/it A and incor3orat&d '&r&in, as *&ll as all motions, doc$m&nts, and affidavits fil&d /% Windsor in t'& instant Civil Action and all ord&rs of t'is co$rt. @2. Windsor 'as fil&d a tim&l% and s$ffici&nt affidavit t'at +W4 'as a
3&rsonal /ias and 3r&?$dic& a-ainst Windsor and a 3&rsonal /ias in favor of t'& (&f&ndants and f&llo* ?$d-&s. T'& affidavit stat&s t'& facts and t'& r&asons for t'& /&li&f t'at /ias or 3r&?$dic& &9ists, and t'is motion and affidavit ar& /&in- fil&d fo$r da%s aft&r t'& O.(2. in *'ic' t'& /ias of +W4 *as cl&arl% d&monstrat&d. T'& facts ar& s$c' t'at a r&asona/l& 3&rson *o$ld f&&l t'at /ias &9ists. @". P$rs$ant to 51C. .$l& 2<, +W4 s'all 3roc&&d no f$rt'&r '&r&in, and
anot'&r ?$d-& s'all /& assi-n&d to '&ar t'is 3roc&&din-. W)2.2#O.2, 'avin- no* fil&d t'is Motion and s*orn affidavits, Windsor r&s3&ctf$ll% r&;$&sts as follo*sL 61) t'at t'is Motion /& r&f&rr&d to anot'&r ?$d-& for a '&arin-C 62) t'at t'& Co$rt -rant PLAINTI## WILLIAM M. WIN(1O.>1 2M2.=2NCQ MOTION TO .2C512 +W4C 6") t'at t'& Co$rt iss$& an ord&r r&c$sin- +W4C 6!) t'at t'& Co$rt stri,& all ord&rs /% +W4 and r&;$ir& t'& (&f&ndants to fil& tim&l% ans*&rs to t'& #irst Am&nd&d V&rifi&d Com3laintC
2!
6<) t'at t'& Co$rt cond$ct a '&arin- to r&consid&r t'& .&;$&st for T&m3orar% .&strainin- Ord&r and Pr&liminar% In?$nction, and t'& ot'&r iss$&sC 6 ) t'at t'& Co$rt -rant a conf&r&nc& *it' all 3arti&sC and 6@) t'at t'& Co$rt -rant s$c' ot'&r and f$rt'&r r&li&f as ?$stic& r&;$ir&s in association *it' t'is Motion. 1$/mitt&d t'is 11t' da% of Octo/&r, 2011.
############################### W$%%$&' M. W$(d)*+ P+* S, PO 4o9 E12" Mari&tta, =A "00 E T&l&3'on&L @@0H<@EH10D! #acsimil&L @@0H2"!H!10 2mailL *illiam*indsorR/&llso$t'.n&t
2<
VERIFICATION OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR I, William M. Windsor, s*&ar t'at I am a$t'oriN&d to ma,& t'is v&rification and t'at t'& facts all&-&d in t'& for&-oin- MOTION ar& tr$& and corr&ct /as&d $3on m% 3&rsonal ,no*l&d-&, &9c&3t as to t'& matt&rs '&r&in stat&d to /& all&-&d on information and /&li&f, and t'at as to t'os& matt&rs I /&li&v& t'&m to /& tr$&. In accordanc& *it' 2E 5.1.C. J 1@! , I d&clar& $nd&r 3&nalt% of 3&r?$r% t'at t'& for&-oin- is tr$& and corr&ct /as&d $3on m% 3&rsonal ,no*l&d-&. T'is 11t' da% of Octo/&r, 2011.
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS William M. Windsor 1*orn to /&for& m&, t'is 11t' da% of Octo/&r, 2011. SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS Notar% P$/lic
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I '&r&/% c&rtif% t'at I 'av& s&rv&d t'& for&-oin- /% &l&ctronic mail and /% d&3ositin- a tr$& and corr&ct co3% of t'& sam& in t'& 5nit&d 1tat&s mail, 3ro3&r 3osta-& affi9&d t'&r&to, addr&ss&d as follo*sL Lanna .&n&& )ill .. (avid War& 0a%& Wood*ard 4$rr&ll +&rol%n W&// #&rrari Offic& of t'& #$lton Co$nt% Attorn&% 1!1 Pr%or 1tr&&t, 1$it& !0"E HH Atlanta, =A "0"0" !0!H 12H02! HH #a9L !0!H@"0H "2! Lanna.'illRf$ltonco$nt%-a.-ov T'is 11t' da% of Octo/&r, 2011.
############################### W$%%$&' M. W$(d)*+ P+* S, PO 4o9 E12" Mari&tta, =A "00 E T&l&3'on&L @@0H<@EH10D! #acsimil&L @@0H2"!H!10 2mailL *illiam*indsorR/&llso$t'.n&t
2@