A Nimzowitsch Story

Edward Winter

Woodcut of Aron Nimzowitsch by Erwin Voellmy (Schweizerische Schachzeitung , September 1929, page 138)

Page 138 of Schach 2000 Jahre Spiel-Geschichte by R. Finkenzeller, W. Ziehr and E. Bhrer (Stuttgart, 1989) ascribed to Tartakower a remark quoted as Eine Drohung ist strker als eine Ausfhrung . In the English-language edition (London, 1990) that came out lumberingly as A threat is more effective than the actual implementation, whereas the usual rendering is The threat is stronger than the execution. Moreover, Nimzowitsch, rather than Tartakower, is customarily named as the coiner of the phrase, with everything tied into the famous smoking threat anecdote. On page 191 of the July 1953 CHESS M. Lipton pointed out two contradictory versions of the story of Nimzowitsch complaining that his opponent was threatening to smoke. On pages 31-32 of Chess for Fun & Chess for Blood (Philadelphia, 1942) Edward Lasker asserted that the incident, involving a cigar, had occurred in an offhand game between Nimzowitsch and Emanuel Lasker in Berlin (although there was still, according to Edward Laskers account, an umpire to whom Nimzowitsch could protest). On page 128 of The World s Great Chess Games (New York, 1951) Reuben Fine stated that the scene had been New York, 1927, and that Nimzowitsch complained to the

tournament director, Marczy, when Vidmar absent-mindedly took out his cigarette case. New York, 1927 was also given as the venue by Irving Chernev (This is the way I heard it back in 1927, when it occurred) on pages 15-16 of The Bright Side of Chess (Philadelphia, 1948). Nimzowitsch, we are told, complained to the tournament committee that Vidmar looked as if he wanted to smoke a cigar, but Chernev mentioned no remark about the threat being stronger than the execution. It is not possible to say when the story first appeared in print. After Alfred Brinckmann had related it in Deutsche Schachbltter in 1932, the BCM (page 307 of the July 1932 issue) accorded it 16 lines, stating that Nimzowitschs objection to tobacco smoke was well known but that A. Brinckmann tells what is to us a new story in this connection. According to the Brinckmann version (New York, 1927, Vidmar, cigars), the Nimzowitsch punchline to the unnamed tournament director was No, but he is threatening to smoke, and as an old player you must know that the threat is stronger than the execution. On page 158 of the May 1954 BCM D.J. Morgan stated regarding the Nimzowitsch story:

The original version in the Evening Standard was contributed by its then chess editor, H. Meek, and we have our friend Mr Meeks authority for saying that he received the story by word of mouth from Marczy, the controller of the tournament in question (New York, 1927). None of this explains why Tartakowers name has been seen or, indeed, when the epigram first evolved. All we can say for now is that in 1932 Tartakower contributed a two-part article on the subject of threats to Les Cahiers de l Echiquier Franais and that in the second part (issue 28, page 373) he wrote:

Pour conclure, invitons le lecteur rflchir sur les considrations suivantes: 1. Puisque est plus forte que l excution pas paradoxal de prtendre qu plus fort de ne pas user de la menace. Qu on appelle cette stratgie louvoiement positionnel stratgie d c est une faon de jouer qui est trs pratique dans les la menace il est est

, il n

, ou attente

jeu ,

grands tournois et qui donne souvent de bons rsultats, car il peut en rsulter chez l adversaire une moindre vigilance. Elle peut, en outre, lui faire perdre patience et le pousser s lancer dans une attaque prmature.

How far back is it possible to trace the threat/execution remark, in the writings of Tartakower, Nimzowitsch or anybody else? And did Marczy ever pen an account of any such Nimzowitsch incident at New York, 1927?

(3197)

From Per Skjoldager (Fredericia, Denmark):

The only example I can find of Nimzowitsch using the phrase about the threat being stronger than the execution is on page 137 of the 9/1933 issue of the Danish magazine annotated his game against I.E.W. Gemze (who was Black) from that year training tournament in Copenhagen:

Skakbladet, where he

s Politiken

Black played 20 and Nimzowitsch wrote:

Qe7,

This retreat by the strongly-posted queen is an excellent move. The pawn at e5 is now heading for its sad fate. It should be noted that Black has continually operated with the threat of Qxa2 without executing it (the modern doctrine, which says that the threat is stronger than the execution).

For reference, his original Danish text reads:

(3200)

Despite Nimzowitschs well-known dislike of tobacco, page 87 of Visiting Mrs Nabokov by Martin Amis (London, 1993) affirmed that Nimzowitsch used to smoke an especially noxious cigar. We have now found a much older and more extensive version of the alleged Nimzowitsch observation discussed in C.N.s 3197 and 3200. From pages xiv-xv of Chess Openings by James Mason (London, 1897): A threat or menace of exchange, or of occupation of some important point, is often far more effective than its actual execution. For example, in the Ruy Lpez impending BxKt causes the

defender much uneasiness. He is, to some extent, obliged to confound the possible with the probable; while yet at the same time in serious doubt as to what may really happen. Consequently, when you are attacking a piece or pawn that will keep; when you cannot be prevented from occupying some point of vantage, from which your adversary may be anxious to dislodge you; when you can check now or later, with at least equal effect; in these and all such circumstances be cautious. Do not play a good move too soon . For when you do play it, the worst of it becomes known to your antagonist, who, then free from all doubt or apprehension as to its future happening, is enabled to order his attack or defence accordingly. Therefore reserve it reasonably, thus stretching him on the rack of expectation, while you calmly proceed in development, or otherwise advance the general interests of your position.

(3257)

Relating the Nimzowitsch anti-smoking anecdote on pages 104-105 of their book Chess Panorama (Radnor, 1975), W. Lombardy and D. Daniels presented the punch-line as follows: I know, Nimzowitsch replied, but he threatens to smoke, and you know as well as I that in chess the threat is often stronger than the execution. (This was one of the basic principles elaborated in Nimzowitschs brilliant work My System .) In fact, the only instance found so far of Nimzowitsch putting forward this principle was in a 1933 magazine article (see C.N. 3200). C.N. 3257 referred to an 1897 book by James Mason which contained the concept (A threat or menace of exchange, or of occupation of some important point, is often far more effective than its actual execution), but now Peter Anderberg (Harmstorf, Germany) points out to us that according to Georg Marco (on page 111 of the March-April 1908 Wiener Schachzeitung ) the principle had long been followed by instinct but was first formulated by Karl Eisenbach (1836-1894). This claim came at the end of the annotated game Lasker v Napier, Cambridge Springs, 1904:

Lasker folgte dabei dem lngst instinktiv befolgten, aber erst von Karl Eisenbach formulirten Prinzip: Die Drohung ist strker als die Ausfhrung
A footnote described Eisenbach as one of the deepest chess thinkers: Sekretr der Wiener

Schachgesellschaft, einer der grndlichsten Schachdenker,

1894

(3360)

In a list of maxims and advice on page 229 of A Breviary of Chess (London, 1937) Tartakower included A threat is more powerful than its execution, and attributed it to Tarrasch.

(4328)

From Bernd Graefrath (Mlheim/Ruhr, Germany):

[C.N. 3360 above] gives a quotation from page 111 of the MarchApril 1908 which claimed that Eisenbach] had formulated the principle about the threat being stronger than the execution. I would add that the point was made again on page 151 of the May-June 1908 issue:

Wiener Schachzeitung

[Karl

Wichtiger als die vorgefhrten Details ist aber die Tatsache, da auch hier das Eisenbachsche Prinzip sich bewhrt: Die Drohung ist oft strker als die Ausfhrung.

(4366)

Now we note that in CHESS Flohr brought in a different name:

, 30 September 1963 (page 400, but in fact page 12) Salo

I remember an incident involving Grandmaster Nimzowitsch. He couldnt bear tobacco smoke, and in one tournament he set as a condition that his opponent should not smoke.

His rivals agreed. When Bogoljubow put a full box of cigars on the table before sitting down to play against him, he hurried to the chief umpire in great excitement. The umpire checked up and said, But Bogoljubow isnt smoking. I know he isnt, Nimzowitsch fumed, but he threatens to do so, and the threat in chess is more powerful than the execution. Flohr was not necessarily claiming to have been an eye-witness, but it may be recalled that the incident is usually placed at New York, 1927, where neither Bogoljubow nor Lasker participated.

(4496)

From Joost van Winsen (Silvolde, the Netherlands):

The story was also told by Gerard Oskam on page 41 of February 1951. He wrote that Aron Nimzowitsch set the condition that there should be no smoking by his opponents, who included H. Weenink (1892-1931). Oskam stated that the incident occurred before the game between Nimzowitsch and Tartakower, and he reproduced dialogue allegedly exchanged between the two masters. There are, though, problems with Oskam story. He said that it happened in Lige in 1923, but no such tournament took place. Nimzowitsch, Tartakower and Weenink did participate in Lige, 1930, but Oskam

Schaakmat,

stated that it took Nimzowitsch 35 minutes to make his first move, 1 e4; at Lige, 1930 Nimzowitsch was Black against Tartakower, in a Caro-Kann Defence which was drawn after 20 moves. In fact, Oskam s article indicated that Tartakower was not a smoker, which is corroborated by Kmoch and Reinfeld quoted on page 235 of A Chess Omnibus. Vidmar discussed his own cigar-smoking habits (including a story involving Tartakower at London, 1922) on page 114 of his memoirs (Berlin, 1961).

s list

Goldene Schachzeiten

The smoking anecdote was also related by G. Koltanowski on pages 441-442 of CHESS , 14 August 1936. He called it an old but very good story which had occurred years ago in a double round tournament and he spread out the action, involving Nimzowitsch and Vidmar (plus pipe), over the two rounds in which they faced each other. Nimzowitsch was stated to have complained to Marczy, the tournament director. That suggests New York, 1927, except that it was not a double round tournament. As so often, Koltanowski purported to present the actual words spoken by the protagonists, but when he related the story again on page 13 of his 1968 book TV Chess , the actual words were altogether different.

(4505)

To the Chess Notes main page. To the Archives for other feature articles.

Copyright 2007 Edward Winter. All rights reserved.