Catherine Wang, Michelle Wang, Helen Yang NHD Annotated Bibliography Primary Sources Coke, Sir Edward.

The Institutes of the Laws of England. Sir Edward Cokes viewpoint on the legality of crimes against an unborn child solidified the Born Alive Rule, which was established in the 16th century. This gave us an idea of the legal position of abortions in England, which was integrated into early colonial society. In contrast with beliefs that abortion has been only recently legalized, abortion restrictions only began to be enacted in the 19th century. Comstock, Anthony. Traps for the Young. 1883. We quoted Anthony Comstock, the anti-obscenity crusader of the late 19th century, to illustrate an example of Comstocks views and his rejection of what he regarded as obscene, such as information regarding abortion and contraceptives. Comstocks views serve as a representation of the extremely anti-abortion perspective that prevailed in late 19th century policy, and studying them allowed us to better our understanding of the . "Choice at Risk: Mini Docs & Clips." Choice at Risk. Ed. Dorothy Fadiman. N.p., n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://choiceatrisk.org/videos.shtml>. This website was extremely helpful by providing numerous multimedia resources. Its videos documented personal experiences from women who had been impacted by abortion restrictions before the Roe v. Wade decision. We used excerpts of videos from this website throughout our project to illustrate the pro-choice viewpoint and to give a

deeper perspective of abortion prior to the its legalization. Delaney, John. Interview by Catherine Wang. 26 Mar. 2014. John Delaney is a Democratic Congressman for the 6th District of Maryland. We contacted him to get a modern day politicians stance on the abortion issue 40 years after the case took place. He informed us that he support a woman's right to choose, consistent with the settled law of our country as established in the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, and does not wish for the case to be repealed. We used this quote in our longterm reception page. Evantanto, Azevedo. Interview by Helen Yang. 17 Feb. 2014. Azevedo Evantanto was a participant of the Youth Rally and Mass for Life. We used this interview as an example of the pro-choice viewpoint that exists throughout America in the aftermath of the Roe v. Wade case. Evantanto states that every human has a right to live, similar to how we have been guaranteed fundamental rights in the Constitution. He also states that economic and emotional reasons are the basis for many abortion decisions, and that relieving these burdens can lessen the need for an abortion. Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007). Gonzales v. Carhart permitted the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, which limited secondtrimester abortions. The ruling contrasted with the ruling in Stenberg v. Carhart seven years prior, and was interpreted by many as a more conservative shift in the courts and as a gain for the pro-life side of the abortion issue. Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).

Harris v. McRae, which upheld the Hyde Amendment of 1976 prohibiting the use of Medicaid funds to support abortions, worked slightly against the pro-abortion standpoint fostered by Roe v. Wade. Although it did not limit abortions directly, its upholding of the Hyde Amendment made abortions less available to low income women. We referenced and quoted this case to display the conservative shift in court rulings regarding abortion. Kokoski, Paul. Ronald Reagan: Everybody that is for abortion has already been born. New York Times. September 22nd, 1980. Print. This newspaper article displays Ronald Reagans opinion on abortion as well as the new Republican stance on abortion overall, a change that took place in 1980. Prior to this time period, neither party had taken a definitive stance on abortion. We found Reagans quote to be extremely powerful and representative of the central beliefs of those who associate themselves with being pro-life. March for Womens Lives Photographs. N.d. NOWs 1992 March for Womens Lives. NOW. NOW. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.now.org/history/slideshows/marches/index.php?image=George.jpg>. We used these photos from the March For Womens Lives directly from the original archive to show the strength of the pro-choice movement that existed even in the longer-term aftermath of the case. These photos appear on the Long-Term Reception slideshow. McCorvey, Norma, and Andy Meisler. I Am Roe: My Life, Roe v. Wade, and Freedom of Choice. New York: HarperCollins, 1994. Print.

We used this to show the first person opinion of the plaintiff, Norma McCorvey, or Jane Roe, on the case prior to her decision to become pro-life. This shows her participation in the case as well as her opinion on the right to abortion, and is a great primary source for quotes on Norma McCorveys beliefs about the case and its effects on her and the society she lived in. We used multiple quotes from McCorveys autobiography throughout the website to illustrate her personal views and the impact of the case. NARAL Pro-Choice America. President Obamas Message to NARAL Pro-Choice America Supporters. Youtube. youtube.com, 6 February 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf9njSsFmEg>. We used this primary source video to get a quote showing President Obamas prochoice support of Roe v. Wade 40 years after the decision of the case was made. This is a strong indicator of the Democratic pro-abortion stance that the party has typically taken since the 1980s. It can be found in our long-term reception page. Ney, Philip, Dr. Interview with Dr. Philip Ney. Priests for Life. Priests for Life, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.priestsforlife.org/media/interviewney.htm>. We used this to see the pro-life standpoint on the right to abortions effect on womens health, and the psychological toll that abortion takes on women. Ney speaks about the aftermath of an abortion, stating that many women extreme guilt after receiving an abortion. Ney had also spoken to children of mothers who had received abortions, and states that these children experienced psychological trauma and mistrust after learning of their mothers previous abortions.

"Penal Code of the State of Texas." 1911. PDF file. 28 Feb. 2014. We used this for photos and additional text for reference on the Texas state abortion law called into question during the Roe v. Wade trial. The source is a primary source, as it is the actual Texas State Penal code in PDF format. Planned Parenthood Executive Office, Adrian. Personal interview. 24 Feb. 2014. We used this personal interview with a representative of Planned Parenthood to show the opinion of an abortion and womens health care provider regarding the right to abortion and the open opportunity to provide abortions. Adrians responses to our questions demonstrated the efforts of abortion providers to keep their personal views separate from their occupations, displaying their desires to give a woman the full choice over her body. We also were able to gain information regarding Planned Parenthoods official view on the Planned Parenthood v. Casey case. Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Planned Parenthood v. Casey recognized a womans right to have an abortion, but upheld certain restrictions and regulations of a Pennsylvania abortion law against abortions. The case thus reflected an acceptance of the legality of most abortions, but a refusal to provide abortions under a wide range of circumstances. We included a direct quote from the majority opinion of this case to highlight its effect on the abortion issue. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Studying the court transcripts and court opinions of Roe v. Wade provided us essential knowledge regarding the case and allowed us to gain a far more comprehensive

understanding of the abortion issue. We used quotes and excerpts from Sarah Weddingtons arguments in support of Roes right to have an abortion, Flower and Floyds arguments against the legalization of abortion, and both the majority opinion and dissenting opinions of the court. We also included in our website excerpts of the court opinions using a document reader, which serves as an interactive element of our project. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, (1973). (White, J., dissenting). We used direct quotes from Justice Byron Whites dissenting opinion for Roe v. Wade. Using information directly taken from the dissenting opinion as well as a large excerpt (seen on the Decision: Opposition page), we were able to outline the reasons for the 2 Supreme Court justices who voted against Roe. Roe v. Wade Oral Argument. Rec. 1971. 1973. Oyez. Web. 9 Apr. 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_18>. We took audio clips from this full length recording of the oral argument of Roe v. Wade, recorded at the case itself (and is therefore a primary source). Using these audio clips, we were able to show crucial parts of the support and oppositions argument in our pages for During the Case. Roe v. Wade Oral Reargument. Rec. 1972. 1973. Oyez. Web. 9 Apr. 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_18>. We took audio clips from this full length recording of the oral argument of Roe v. Wade, recorded at the case itself (and is therefore a primary source). Using these audio clips, we were able to show crucial parts of the support and oppositions argument in our pages for

During the Case. Unlike the initial argument, Sarah Weddington made specifically stronger arguments for the constitutionality of abortion and the rights of women which she had faltered on in her original argument. Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Stenberg v. Carhart struck down Nebraskas ban on partial-birth abortion, asserting that such a ban placed an undue burden on a womans right to have an abortion. However, allthough the case followed the precedents of Roe and Planned Parenthood, the court was sharply divided over the case in a 5-4 decision, showing the complicated nature of the abortion issue. Weddington, Sarah. Winning Roe v. Wade: Q&A with Sarah Weddington Read more: Winning Roe v. Wade: Q&A with Sarah Weddington. Interview by Valerie Lapinski. TIME 22 Jan. 2013: n. pag. Print. We used this as interview to see how Sarah Weddington, the plaintiffs lawyer, viewed the case and its development throughout the years. She developed her opinion on how the womens movement for abortion rights and personal freedoms has progressed, and what she thinks the future will be like for those who support abortions continuation. These quotes can be seen on the After-Effects page. Whose Choice: How the Hyde Amendment Harms Poor Women. Center for Reproductive Rights. Center for Reproductive Rights, 31 Sept. 2010. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://reproductiverights.org/en/feature/whose-choice-how-the-hyde-amendment-harmspoor-women>.

We used this video on our post-Roe cases page to show the effect of the Hyde Amendment on low-income women. It shows the changes to abortion rights, especially regarding financial support for abortions (since according to the Hyde Amendment, Medicaid typically does not provide financial aid to fund abortions), that have occurred since the Roe v. Wade decision.

Secondary Sources AP Photo. The 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade. 18 Jan. 2013. Photograph. US News. We used these photos for our Title page presentation, and on select pages in the website. They depict the battle for womens right to abortion from the time of the case to the present, 40 years after the case was decided. Boonstra, Heather D. The Heart of the Matter: Public Funding of Abortion for Poor Women in the United States. Guttmacher Institute. Ed. Guttmacher Institute. Guttmacher Institute, 2007. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/10/1/gpr100112.html>. We used this to research the problems with funding abortion clinics that have existed since Roe v. Wade was decided. The problem has grown more and more severe in recent years, and it can be seen in our long-term reception page as well as our aftereffects page. Balkin, Jack M., ed. What Roe v. Wade should have said. New York and London: New York UP, 2005. Print. We used this book simply as a reference for opinions on the case in the aftermath of the case especially. It also enlightens us on some of the finer details of the case that the general overviews would miss, such as the personal opinions before, during, and after the case of multiple Supreme Court Justices, as well as the opinions of several experts in the field of law regarding the decision of the Roe v. Wade case. CBN News. March for life pushes the Adoption Option. Youtube. youtube.com, 6

February 2013. Web. 22 Jan. 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnMnw95NyeA>. We used this video in our pages to show the pro-life movement against Roe v. Wade that has continued to grow 40 years after the decision of the case was made. The shouts and chants of the people are common arguments that are made during marches that support the pro-life movement and hope to repeal the decision made in 1973. It can be found in our long-term reception page. Center for Reproductive Rights. Roe v. Wade - Then and Now. Center for Reproductive Rights. Ed. Center for Reproductive Rights. reproductiverights.org, 1 July 2007. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://reproductiverights.org/en/document/roe-v-wade-thenand-now>. We used this to research the problems that Roe v. Wade faces in todays world, especially regarding changes that have taken place in legislation for abortion and availability of abortion clinics in the United States. This website provides in depth information on not only the decision of the case, but also the apparent dismantling of Roes policies, the four pillars of Roe, and Roe in the 21st century. We have used these ideas to structure our webpages, especially regarding pages for during the case and after the case. Chicago Tribune Company, LLC. Timeline of Abortion Laws and Events. Chicago Tribune. Ed. Chicago Tribune Company, LLC. Chicago Tribune Company, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.chicagotribune.com/sns-abortion-timeline,0,7911413.story>. We used this to create timelines of the before and after effects of Roe v. Wade, as

it provides detailed historical information on public reception and legislative efforts by the US House of Representatives and Senate. It also outlines some major social events that took place which influenced the Roe decision. This information can be found in the before Roe and after Roe pages. Chung, Jamie. 40 years after Roe v. Wade: Inside North Dakotas only abortion clinic. Time U.S. Time, 22 Jan. 2013. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <http://nation.time.com/2013/01/22/40-years-after-roe-inside-north-dakotas-onlyabortion-clinic/photo/01120924_time_clinic_day-1-0239b-crop/>. We used these photos to take a look at the conditions that exist inside North Dakotas abortion clinics in the present day, as it is an example of one of the few states which only have one abortion clinic in the entire area. The conditions although clean and acceptable, are undermined by the name of the abortion clinic itself Red River, and we used this idea to bring up the pro-life movements push to shame women into avoiding abortions. "Connecticut and the Comstock Law." Connecticut History. Connecticut Humanities, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://connecticuthistory.org/connecticut-and-the-comstock-law/>. This website gave an overview of the Comstock laws, particularly the Comstock law passed in Connecticut. This law was the strictest anti-abortion law during its time period. This website also provided a satirical cartoon of Comstock, which we used in our website to describe America's views on abortion during the 19th century, and a photograph of Comstock, which we also used in our website. Culp-Ressler, Tara. "How Some States Are Rolling Back The Clock To A Time Before

Roe v. Wade." ThinkProgress 22 Jan. 2013: n. pag. ThinkProgress. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/01/22/1480281/life-before-roe/>. This article focused on the socio-economic demographic of women who received abortions, and also spoke about how states have been recently repealing abortion rights, bringing us back to a state similar to that before the Roe v. Wade decision. We used this in our discussion of America's stance on abortion before and after Roe v. Wade. Cushman, Robert F., ed. Leading Constitutional Decisions. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1992. Print. We used this book as a reference for the court case documents of Roe v. Wade. It gave us specific details from the court cases decision, including quotes from both lawyers, questions from the Supreme Court justices, and a brief synopsis of the majority/dissenting opinions of the 7-2 decision. The information can be found in the pages for during the case. "Dissent from Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton and their Progeny." EndRoe. NCHLA, n.d. Web. 3 Mar. 2014. <http://endroe.org/dissentswhite.aspx>. We used this page to provide information on the dissents of the Supreme Court justices and also for the pictures of the Justices who dissented. Faux, Marian. Roe v. Wade: The Untold Story of the Landmark Supreme Court Decision That Made Abortion Legal. N.p.: Cooper Square, 2000. Print. Fauxs book on the story behind Roe v. Wade gave us a comprehensive review of the story behind Norma McCorvey (Jane Roe) as well as her interactions with lawyers Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee. She gives insight about the abortion issue prior to

the case, and also provides extensive information regarding the debate and decision of the case, which we incorporated into our website. We used quotes of Fauxs analysis to highlight the main arguments of the two sides of the case. Feminism101.com. Timeline: Abortion Rights. Feminism 101. Ed. Feminism101.com. Feminism101.com, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.feminism101.com/timelineabortion.html>. We were able to use this website to display the course of events that have taken place from the beginnings of abortions existence in history to the current day events. This site uses a distinct feminist tone so we were careful to consider this when using the site. Still, we used some information in our pages (especially the timeline pages) for before the case and after the case. Fragile Promise of Choice: Abortion in the US Today. Dir. Dorothy Fadiman. Choice At Risk. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://choiceatrisk.org/videos.shtml>. We used these video clips to show the effects in the aftermath of the case, particularly regarding further court cases and effect on womens lives. Gold, Rachel Benson. "Lessons from Before Roe: Will Past be Prologue?" Guttmacher Institute. Alan Guttmacher Institute, Mar. 2003. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/06/1/gr060108.html>. This website (from the Guttmacher Institute, which is focused on advancing women's rights regarding sexual and reproductive health) provides a brief overview of abortion prior to Roe v. Wade. It gave me insight about the illegal abortions that were prevalent

prior to the landmark decision. The author illustrates her support of the Roe v. Wade decision with graphs illustrating abortion trends and abortion laws over the past few decades. Gold, Rachel Benson. Abortion and Women's Health: A Turning Point for America?, The Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York, 1990. This book contained a relevant image that showed which states had legalized abortion by 1972, right before the Roe v. Wade decision. This image proved to be extremely useful in illustrating the effect of the Model Penal Code, which reformed abortion laws in the years leading up to Roe v. Wade. Greenhouse, Linda, and Reva Siegel. Before Roe v. Wade. 2nd ed. N.p.: n.p., 2012. Print. We found this source to be extremely helpful in researching the historical background of Roe v. Wade, particularly during the years directly before the court decision. It gave a thorough of the perspective women had toward abortion before it was legalized, as well as viewpoints from both pro-abortion and anti-abortion figures. "History of Abortion." National Abortion Federation. National Abortion Federation, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.prochoice.org/>. This website was extremely helpful in giving an overview of abortion both before and after Roe v. Wade. Along with the timeline of the history of abortion, the website also provided some statistics. However, much of the information presented is under proabortion stance, so I was mindful in evaluating the website's content and attempted to lessen the bias as much as possible.

Huffington Post Politics. Ill Not Yield - Wendy Davis Takes A Stand In Texas. Youtube. youtube.com, 1 July 2011. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je3lRGs-_AA>. We used this site for the video of Wendy Daviss filibuster in the summer of 2013, in the Long-Term reception page of our website. It was important, as it showed the distinct pressure that has been put on pro-choice activists to maintain their ground against legislation that has been distinctly anti-abortion in recent years. Joffe, Carol. Roe v. Wade and Beyond: Forty Years of Legal Abortion in the United States. Dissent. Ed. Dissent Magazine. Dissent Magazine, 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/roe-v-wade-and-beyond-forty-years-of-legalabortion-in-the-united-states>. We used this website as a reference for the effects that Roe v. Wade had on America, economically, socially, and politically. It was especially important in our AfterEffects page of the website, and we based a lot of our organization of that page (including effects on income, education, and the feminist movement) specifically off of the article itself. Kliff, Sarah. "Thirteen charts that explain how Roe v. Wade changed abortion rights." Washington Post 22 Jan. 2014: n. pag. Washington Post. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/01/22/thirteen-charts-thatexplain-how-roe-v-wade-changed-abortion-rights/>. This article provided a multitude of graphs that illustrated abortion statistics, along with a brief analysis of each graph. These graphs proved especially relevant as we documented

the effect of Roe v. Wade on both the mindsets of the American public (regarding the ethicality of abortion) and on the legal position that the nation and states have taken on abortion. Knappman, Edward W., et al. Great American Trials. Detroit: Visible Ink, 1994. Print. We used this book as a reference for general information regarding Roe v. Wade. We were also able to find dissenting opinions and the long-term reception of the American public and the American political system towards this case in this book. Levitt, Steven D., and Stephen J. Dubner. Freakonomics. New York: HarperCollins, 2005. Print. We used this book to display the interesting opinion that Roe v. Wade may have enabled the crime rate in America to go down. We used a quote from this book to demonstrate the effect of the case on crime in the After-Effects page of the after Roe section of the website. Levy, Ariel. Lift and Separate. New Yorker. N.p., 16 Nov. 2009. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2009/11/16/091116crbo_books_levy?curr entPage=all>. We used a photo from this article to display the feminist movement while Roe v. Wade was taking place. It can be seen in the Effect on the Feminist Movement section of the After-Effects webpage. Lewis, J., and O. Shimabukuro. "Abortion Law Development: A Brief Overview." Almanac of Policy Issues. N.p., 8 Jan. 2001. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.

<http://www.policyalmanac.org/culture/archive/crs_abortion_overview.shtml>. This website gave a detailed overview of abortion legislation throughout the years, which was extremely relevant in our research of the historical background behind Roe v. Wade. The authors utilize a professional and relatively neutral tone throughout, and much of the website's content lies on concrete description of legislation and court cases instead of opinionated commentary. The page also includes various citations toward court decisions, indicating in-depth research and supported evidence NRLC. Abortion History Timeline. National Right to Live. Ed. NRLC and PicoSearch. NRLC, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/history/>. This source was used in a similar way to the Feminist101 and Chicago Tribune source, to display the changing opinions and laws regarding abortion that have taken place since Roe v. Wade. NWLC. Roe v. Wade and the Right to Abortion. National Womens Law Center. Ed. National Womens Law Center. National Womens Law Center, 18 Jan. 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.nwlc.org/resource/roe-v-wade-and-right-abortion>. We used this website for general knowledge on the case, as well as for pictures for the Silent No More campaign. The Silent No More campaign was used to show the negative psychological effects that abortions may have on women. It can be found on the After Effects page. Oz8drive, and WarThemedRevolution. Norma McCorvey (Jane Roe from Roe v. Wade) Becomes Prolife. Youtube. Youtube.com, 4 May 2011. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc_TgP3QLE4>. We used this to show Jane Roe aka Norma McCorveys switch to become prolife, showing the effect that the pro-life movement has created in the modern day. The video can be found on the Long-Term Reception page of the after Roe section. "People & Events: Anthony Comstock's 'Chastity' Laws." American Experience: The Pill. PBS, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevents/e_comstock.html>. This website described the Comstock laws, which were anti-obscenity laws that severely limited a woman's access to materials regarding contraceptives or abortion. This website gave us an idea of the limited nature of abortions in the 19th and early 20th century. Pichler, Susanne. Roe v. Wade: Its History and Impact. Ed. Deborah Golub, MPH. Planned Parenthood. Ed. Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc. Katharine Dexter McCormick Library, 29 Dec. 2006. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.plannedparenthood.org/resources/research-papers/roe-v-wade-6578.htm>. We used this to research the history and impact of Roe v. Wade particularly in the viewpoint of reproductive care clinics such as Planned Parenthood, and also called into the Planned Parenthood executive office (see primary sources) for more information about the official standpoint that Planned Parenthood takes on the Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade, since it has such a large impact on their business.. Pickert, Kate. What Choice? Time Magazine. Time, 14 Jan. 2013. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2132761,00.html>.

We used this article to show the anti-choice, anti-abortion sentiment that has grown in the past 40 years since the original court case was decided. Not only has the social backlash grown, but the Supreme Court has also rescinded some of the rights that they permitted in the original case in further court cases, as the Justices change. Rovner, Julie. Roe v. Wade Turns 40, But Abortion Debate Is Even Older. NPR. Ed. NPR. NPR, 22 Jan. 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2013/01/22/169637288/roe-v-wade-turns-40-butabortion-debate-is-even-older>. We used this for information on the extent and history of the abortion debate, and as a source for photos. Roe v. Wade and the Right to Abortion. National Womens Law Center. National Womens Law Center, 18 Jan. 2013. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <http://www.nwlc.org/resource/roe-v-wade-and-right-abortion#factsheet>. We used this website for factual information on Roe v. Wade and the statistics for abortions that have taken place in the United States since Roe was decided. Roe v. Wade - Case Brief Summary. Lawnix. Lawnix, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.lawnix.com/cases/roe-wade.html>. We used this website for general information on Roe v. Wade. Much of it was used to structure the site into before during, and after the case. Roe v. Wade. Cornell Law. Cornell University, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113>.

We used this source for general information on Roe v. Wade and for specific insight into the case (using the papers from the case and the transcribed arguments). "Roe v. Wade: Its History and Impact." Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.plannedparenthood.org/resources/research-papers/roe-v-wade-6578.htm>. This website helped us develop our understanding of the history behind Roe v. Wade. It includes some cases that lead to the development of the Roe v. Wade decision, as well as the legality of abortion prior to the decision. The website also gives statistics that describe abortion conditions prior to legalization and afterward, which helped give us an idea of the effect of the legalization of abortion. RSF Review. The Rise of Women: Seven Charts Showing Womens Rapid Gains in Educational Achievement. Russel Sage Foundation. Ed. RSF. Russel Sage Foundation, 21 Feb. 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.russellsage.org/blog/rise-women-sevencharts-showing-womens-rapid-gains-educational-achievement>. We used this to show the gains in achievement that women have made since Roe v. Wade was decided in the aftermath portion. Scheidell, Dora. "Pioneers of women's rights movement reflect on Roe v. Wade anniversary." CNY Central 22 Jan. 2013: n. pag. CNY Central. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.cnycentral.com/news/story.aspx?id=851055#.UxZdVfldWSo>. The reporter of this article interviewed women who had experienced the effect of abortion legalization speaking about the importance of a woman having the right to

abortion. We used a clip of this video in our website to illustrate the pro-abortion viewpoint prior to the Roe v. Wade decision. We felt as though these video clips gave a more emotional argument to the pro-abortion vi Silent No More Campaign. SPUC. SPUC, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <https://www.spuc.org.uk/about/snm/>. We used this website for photos on the Silent No More campaign, which displays the psychological toll that abortion takes on women. "Slide Show: Roe v. Wade and the Struggle for Legalized Abortion." New Yorker [New York]: n. pag. New Yorker. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/01/slide-show-roe-v-wadeand-the-struggle-for-legalized-abortion.html>. This article provided ten photographs, along with captions and sources, that illustrated the pro-abortion versus anti-abortion debate, from as far as 70 years ago to the present. We used these photographs throughout our website, such as in our homepage. Supreme Court Cases. Oyez. Chicago-Kent College of Law, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_18>. We used this website for information on the Supreme Court cases for quotes and images for our pages for During and After the case. It provided not only secondary sources, but primary sources, including audios (see primary sources). Thomson Reuters. STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA, et al. v. CARHART. FindLaw. Ed. FindLaw. Thomson Reuters, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.

<http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=530&invol=914>. We used this for information on a later Supreme Court case that was affected by Roe, Stenberg v. Carhart. TIME. 40 Years After Roe: Inside North Dakotas Only Abortion Clinic. Time U.S. Ed. TIME. TIME, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://nation.time.com/2013/01/22/40-years-afterroe-inside-north-dakotas-only-abortion-clinic/photo/01120924_time_clinic_day-1-0239bcrop/>. We used this for information on the limitations that exist on Roe v. Wade 40 years after the case took place. Ushistory.org. Roe v. Wade and Its Impact. U.S. History Online Textbook. Ed. Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.ushistory.org/us/57d.asp>. We used this for general information on the impact of Roe v. Wade in the United States in the aftermath of the decision. Its information can be seen in the After-Effects page and to structure some of the other after Roe pages. Whose Choice: How the Hyde Amendment Harms Poor Women. Center for Reproductive Rights. Ed. Center for Reproductive Rights. reproductiverights.org, 13 Sept. 2010. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://reproductiverights.org/en/feature/whose-choicehow-the-hyde-amendment-harms- poor-women>. This site provided us with a video on how the Hyde Amendment, which took place after Roe v. Wade, hurt low-income women. Unable to get abortions, low-income

women seeking abortions were hurt financially. Youth Rally & Mass for Life Company. 2014 Event Recap. Youth Rally & Mass for Life. Ed. Youth Rally & Mass for Life Company. Archdiocese of Washington, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. We used this for information on the pro-life movement and the arguments that they make regarding restrictions on abortion from a religious standpoint. We also talked to several students about these restrictions.