Father Ferreira's Public Letter Regarding The Apparitions of Fatima

Father Ferreiras Public Letter Regarding
the Fatima Apparitions

Father Ferreira, the parish priest of St. Anthonys church
in Fatima, was suspected of helping the Administrator of
Ourem to kidnap Lucia, Francisco, and Jacinta on August 13,
1917. This was a plausible theory, given that Father Ferreira
was skeptical of and relatively negative towards the events at
the Cova da Iria. Moreover, the Administrator, Arturo
Santos, had taken the children to Father Ferreira, and
kidnapped them as they left the rectory after talking to the
priest.
After a short appearance by Our Lady on August 13, a
large, angry crowd confronted Father Ferreira with their
suspicions. In hindsight, it does not appear that Father
Ferreira was involved in the kidnapping. He was merely
used as a foil by the Administrator to seize the children.
But tempers remained hot, and Father Ferreira was
threatened numerous times. This prompted his public letter,
in which he sought to exonerate himself from complicity in
the kidnapping. In doing so, he inadvertently affirmed the
apparitions, something he had never done, publicly or
privately. The letter was published in the Ordem, of Lisbon,
and the Ouriense, of Ourem.
TO BELIEVERS AND NON-BELIEVERS:
Reluctantly, as a Catholic priest, I beg to make known and to
declare the following before all those who may know or hear
rumors infamous and damaging to my reputation as parish
priest that I was an accomplice in the imprisonment of three
children in my parish who assert that they have seen Our Lady.
I make this statement on the authority of the parents and for
the satisfaction of the 5,000 to 6,000 persons who came many
miles and with great sacrifice to see and speak with them. I deny
this infamous and insidious calumny, and declare before the
whole world that I had nothing whatever to do, directly or
indirectly, with this impious and sacrilegious action.
The Mayor (Arturo Santos, also known as the
Administrator, and the Tinsmith) did not confide his
intentions to me. And if it was providential which it was
that he acted secretly and without any resistance on the part of
253
the children, it was no less than providential that the excitement
to which this diabolical rumor gave rise was calmed, or the
parish would certainly have had to mourn the death of its priest
as an accomplice in the crime. That the Devil did not succeed in
this, was due certainly to the Virgin Mother. The Mayor, after a
protracted interrogation in their own houses, had the children
brought to mine under the pretext of collecting more accurate
information about the secret which they had refused to reveal to
anyone. Then, at the time when he judged it opportune, he
ordered them into the carriage, and telling the parents that he
was taking them to the Cova da Iria, in fact took them to Vila
Nova de Ourem. Why did he choose my house from which to
act? In order to escape the consequences of his action? In order
that the people should riot, as they did, and accuse me of
complicity? Or for some other reason?
I do not know. I only know that I deny all responsibility in
the matter, and leave judgment to God. No one can prevent a
work of God.
Thousands of eyewitnesses can attest that the presence of
the children was not necessary for the Queen of Heaven to
manifest Her power. They themselves will attest to the
extraordinary phenomena which occurred to confirm their
faith. But now, it is not a trio of children, but thousands of
people of all ages, classes and conditions who have seen for
themselves. If my absence from the Cova, as parish priest, gave
offense to believers, my presence as a witness would have been
no less objectionable to unbelievers. The Blessed Virgin has no
need of the parish priest, in order to manifest Her goodness and
the enemies of religion need not tarnish their benevolence by
attributing the faith of the people to the presence or otherwise of
the parish priest. Faith is a gift of God and not of the priests. This
is the true motive of my absence and apparent indifference to
such a sublime and marvelous event. This is why I have not
replied to the thousand questions and letters, which have been
directed to me. The enemy is not asleep, but like a roaring lion.
The Apostles were not the first to announce the Resurrection. I
abstain from any narration of the above-mentioned facts on
account of the length of this letter, and because the Press will
most certainly have given its own accounts.
I am, yours faithfully,
Fr. Manuel Marques Ferreira
Sister Lucia
254
Note: Father Joseph Pelletier remarks: Notwithstanding the
tone of this letter, all authors agree that the pastor did not
believe in the apparitions. If the letter is read carefully it will
be found that it does not contain one single explicit
affirmation of belief in the reality of the apparitions. It was
carefully worded because of the explosive nature of the
situation, so as not to indicate his disbelief (Pelletier, op. cit.,
p. 152, fn 5).
Apostle of Marys Immaculate Heart
255

Father Ferreira's Public Letter Regarding The Apparitions of Fatima

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Father Ferreira's Public Letter Regarding The Apparitions of Fatima

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Father Ferreira's Public Letter Regarding The Apparitions of Fatima

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What was Father Ferreira's role in the kidnapping of the children?

Why did the Administrator take the children to Father Ferreira's house?

Father Ferreiras Public Letter Regarding

the Fatima Apparitions

You might also like